Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Students Name
University/College
How conceptual blending construct meaning 2
Introduction
memory in regards to a broad range of meanings. It plays an integral role in the development of
meaning in everyday activities such as advertising and language acquisition. The basis of the
operation is the establishment of a minimal link between binary inputs, and to establish from
these inputs to a contemporary mental space that is blended[ CITATION Eva06 \l 1033 ]. It is
elaborate conceptual blending is the initial capacity required for language and thought. This
essay will provide an analysis of cognitive linguistics, and will illustrate the mechanisms of
conceptual blending and how they lead to the establishment of meaning. The example used will
The methods in cognitive research include an analysis to look at how people tick so that
we gain an understanding of the internal processes of the mind. Cognitive research tries to look
at the human mental processes in regards to language, and their role in feeling, behaving and
thinking. The methodologies in the research involve looking at language development, and how
an individual processes information. Furthermore, it looks at how a person treats information and
response to stimuli. Many scholars have looked a cognitive linguistics such as Evans (2007) and
Geeraerts (2010). Their work will be part of the core literature of this essay.
blending where the elements from a central domain frame are blended. At a linguistic level, two
free morphemes are combined to form a compound. Compounds can be in the form of nouns
(kitchen-chair) or adjective compounds (dark-blue). The boat race desribes a complex example
of blending. In this context, a modern catamaran was sailing in a race from Boston to San
Francisco. The boat is trying to go faster and win the challenge than another kind of boat that has
sailed on the same course. A newspaper reported the story as, As we went to press, Rich Wilson
and Bill Biewenga were barely maintaining a 4.5 day lead over the ghost of the Clipper
Northern Light, whose record run from San Francisco to Boston they're trying to beat. In 1853,
the clipper made the passage in 76 days, 8 hours. The story is characterized by two different
events that occurred at differing periods. The first is the race by the catamaran in 1993 and the
second context was a race by the clipper in 1853. In the quote above, the two boat races are
described as a single event. The two different events are categorized as two input mental places,
and they show salient aspects of the various events. These are the departure, voyage, and the
arrival of the boats. Further information includes the boats themselves, the time and period of
travel, and the positions of the boats during various periods of the race. The two races have a
similar schematic frame in regards to sailing from Boston from San Francisco[ CITATION Joy09
\l 1033 ]. It is also known as the generic space, and it connects the two activities. Blending
involves the partial match between the two events or inputs, and this projects selectively
emerging from the two input spaces, and ends up with another blended space.
How conceptual blending construct meaning 4
Within the blended space, the two boats follow a similar goal and are moving on the same
course. They also leave the initial point, in this case, San Francisco, on a similar day. In this
race. It is done through importation of a simple background frame of the activities during the
race. The blend characterizes a construal[ CITATION Gee06 \l 1033 ]. The mapping structurally
constrains the movement of the boats. The argument used signals the combination in an explicit
manner such as the utilization of the expression ghost ship. By analyzing the race in time, we
can have the general location of the racing boats and their attributes. The blended spaces are
linked through the inputs by the mapping in that the factual inferences are then determined by the
inputs arising from the hypothetical event within the blended space. For instance, we can realize
that the second boat is moving at a higher speed in comparison to the clipper based on the year of
performances, in this case, four and half days. It is also possible to interpret the feelings and
thoughts of the crews in regards to the familiar feelings linked to the domain of racing.
Essentially, the race is an example of blending. The inputs have a single structure. They are
How conceptual blending construct meaning 5
connected to a mapping that is cross-space, and are detailed to a blended domain[ CITATION
Metaphor
The study of metaphor compression has been of importance to cognitive linguistics. The
metaphorical and initial meaning can often take a similar amount of time to comprehend.
However, metaphors will require more processing resources and effort. Furthermore, the
comprehension strategies for metaphorical versus literal utterances could require a similar
amount of time to complete, yet they entail varying computations. The mapping stimuli used for
accurate analysis shows that words are used that thought to include some of the conceptual
sentences that detail cases where an object was submitted for another and in a case where a
subject is mistaken for another. Essentially, a single object is used to represent another. In all the
contexts, the comprehender is required to establish a mapping between the two objects, and the
In the context that the metaphor relies on the variations among the relevant concepts, then
it means that there is a degree of metaphorical inference. Even though some utterances are
prototypically metaphoric, while others are prototypically not metaphoric. They do not have any
hard distinction between these two categories[ CITATION Lak80 \l 1033 ]. A sentence that
begins with If I were a cloud can be considered as less metaphoric than one that starts with I
am a cloud.' It arises from the fact that the counterfactual invalidates the proposition that the two
objects can be categorized in one sentence. It means that both sentences can be detailed based on
a similar domain of conceptual projects and links. The profiling can also differ in both cases in
How conceptual blending construct meaning 6
that one is more common without prototypes of metaphors[ CITATION Joy09 \l 1033 ].
Metaphors usually mean counterpart connections that lack any explicit attention to incongruities
Metonymy
A metonymy is an indexical ratio that occurs between a source and a target. The meaning
is treated and presented with metaphor. It is viewed as a particular kind of iconic relation. It
supports the belief that domains, single domains, subdomains, and separate domains that have
been used as criteria for distinguishing metonymy for metaphor are unreliable[ CITATION
Eva07 \l 1033 ]. Cognitive linguistics considers both metonymy and metaphor as mechanisms
that aid in structuring the human conceptual system. They are closely related, as both are a non-
literal application in language. However, the differences arise from the number of domains
reported. The function of the metonymy is to provide generic prompts, and they act as inputs for
additional pragmatic inferences that detail the specifics of the intended statements meaning.
First language acquisition is often studied in the context of child language acquisition. It
acquisition (L1A) often consider the adult-like grammar and syntactic categories, there has been
little concern about whether they are mentally the case for children. The cognitive function
framework has shown that children do not act within linguistic entities that are abstracts in
nature, but rather operate based on form-meaning-item based constructions. It is only gradual
based on linguistic experience. The childrens ability to deal with more abstract and general
categories, for example, the inflection and argument structure, changes between the ages of two
How conceptual blending construct meaning 7
token and type frequency, the complexity of form and consistency of form-function mapping.
They are significant aspects of language acquisition among children. It also plays a role in the
often easier than useful generalizations. A critical description of first language acquisition is
detailed by a usage-based strategy in which young individuals process the language they
encounter in the context of interactions with other people. Furthermore, they rely exclusively and
explicitly on the cognitive and social skills that children at this age tend to have[ CITATION
Gee10 \l 1033 ].
An essential idea in cognitive linguistics is that sentences, words, and other linguistic
structures, are not inherently meaningful. However, speakers convey a particular meaning using
them. For instance, when an individual hears the word tools,' they will utilize certain areas of
their knowledge base. Moreover, unique areas are activated based on varying degrees, and it
depends on the context in use[ CITATION Joy09 \l 1033 ]. Understanding the meaning of
particular words will mean that the individual has knowledge of the conventions and concepts
that surround the use of specific words. For instance, the term weekend means that the person
real meaning of the term weekend. It entails the knowledge of culture in many societies.
In cognitive linguistics, the frame semantics occurs in a context where the words schematic
characteristics are detailed in regards to the way they highlight variables of an associated
structure. It can also depend on how they are structured based on a set of pre-established
assumptions. For instance, sell and buy both encourage what is known as the commercial
transaction domain. Furthermore, the sale means the seller and money, while purchase means the
buyer and the goods[ CITATION Lak80 \l 1033 ]. The tenet in cognitive linguistic suggests that
meaning. The language acts as a backdrop of the conceptual structure. Even though the
information supports the notion that background knowledge represented in frames affects
language compression.
Cognitive linguistics provides a way out of the dilemma that exists between generative,
helpful linguistics and unproductive linguistics in second language pedagogy. Second Language
Acquisition (SLA) entails the study of the cognitive mechanisms and representations of second
language processing. It also looks at their time course of acquisition and the relevance of
language entails the determination of the structure of their usage. In this context, just like
learning all other details of the world, it implies full cognition. Learning a language requires the
application of cognitive processes, images, analogies, and metaphors in thinking. It also focuses
the listeners view to the world. Essentially, attention influences the acquisition of language
itself. The cognitive linguistics principles are influential in understanding the construction of
semantic structures in the first language (L1) and the second language (L2) in regards to human
How conceptual blending construct meaning 9
cognition capacity. It also considers the cultural behavior of both L1 and L2 users.
Cognitive Grammar
promising and natural basis of language instruction. It supports a conceptually grounded account
of linguistic meaning. It shows how alternate expressions construe the same situation faintly, but
this is in different ways. Essentially, it renders comprehensible the varying means of expression a
language provides. The conceptual semantics are also not confined to a lexicon. Instead, it also
imposes a specific construal of the situation being described, grammar can be presented as an
array of meaningful options whose ranges of application are in often predictable. The usage-
based nature of cognitive grammar also provides a better understanding of word formations. The
language structure emerges through abstraction from expressions that are based on usage events,
embracing all dimensions of how interlocutors in the cultural, social understand them and
discourse context[ CITATION Eva06 \l 1033 ]. Essentially, this interactive basis has several
implications for language learning. It arises from the needs to produce and understand the
There is a simplification of the broad issue of the interaction between cognitive and
linguistic categorization is terms of pure, strong, and weak statements. A critical issue is whether
thought influences language or language influences thought. Both positions have been
advocated. Linguistic relativism tries to look at how language influences thought. The language
structures of a language shape the worldview of its speakers. The linguistic relativity principle
details that the differences are arising from how languages encode cognitive and cultural
How conceptual blending construct meaning 10
categories that affect how people think. Mostly, speakers of varying languages behave and think
differently[ CITATION Bel08 \l 1033 ]. The language determines thoughts that are limited by
The impact of linguistic relativity is common in the domain of spatial cognition. It also
arises in the context of social use of the language. Research has shown that linguistic relativity
effects also affect color perception when it is processed in the left hemisphere of the brain. It
means that this half of the brain deals relies on language to a larger extent in comparison to the
right one. Language tends to affect certain kinds of cognitive processes in non-trivial ways even
though other methods have been categorized as universal in nature[ CITATION Gee10 \l 1033 ].
The principle of linguistic relativity and the link between thought and language is an important
Conclusion
the basis for the formation of meaning in everyday life. The construction of meaning is seen
within the context of cognitive linguistics. It is essential in the word formation process such as
compounding. The essay has shown the link between cognitive linguistics and other variables
such as language acquisition, mental spaces, image schemas, and cognitive grammar. Conceptual
meaning.
References
How conceptual blending construct meaning 11
Bell, M., 2008. English Language and Linguistics. 12(3), pp. 549-552.
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A., 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Evans, V., 2007. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press.
Evans, V. & Green, M., 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. An introduction. 1st ed. Edinburgh:
Geeraerts, D., 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. Basic Readings. 1st ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H., 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive -Linguistics. 1st ed.
Joy, A., Sherry, J. F. & Deschenes, J., 2009. Conceptual blending in advertising. Journal of
Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. 1st ed. Chicago: Chicago University
Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. 1st ed. Chicago: Chicago University
Press.
Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H. J., 2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. 1st ed. London:
Pearson.
How conceptual blending construct meaning 12