PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE TEEP and OEE

100% base for TEEP max available time 24hrs * 7 working days
LACK OF ORDERS
PLANNED
MAINTENANCE run time =
100% base for OEE

ENVIRONMENTAL
SET UP TIMES

INFLUENCES
LACK of energy,
personnel, tools,
material ...
DOWNTIMES OF
MACHINERY AND
~ 90% EQUIPMENT INFLUENCES
TECHNICAL

PERFORMANCE LEVEL
of production unit -5%
PRODUCTION
LEVEL OF OF SCRAP -1% earned hours
EXCELLENCE
TEEP = 85%

< 85%

PRODUCTION
OF
GOOD PARTS

appendix 1 revision 01 07/06/2017

Equipment ID:____________________ Dept:____________ Shift:______________
Product:________________________ Line:_____________Date:______________
_________________________________________________________________________
AVAILABILITY (breakdowns, downtime, set up's & adjustments)*
a)Total Available Time: (# of total hours per shift x 60 minutes) ________min min

b)Planned Downtime: (scheduled events-meetings, cleaning, PM etc________min min

c)Run Time: (net available time) a-b #VALUE! min

d)Unplanned Downtime: #breakdowns______ x min lost =_____ ________min min

1+2+3+4 2 #changeover______ x min lost =_____ ________min min
3 #su & adj ______ x min lost =_____ ________min min
4 #minor stop ______ x min lost =_____ ________min min

e)Operating Time:(run time - downtime) c-d #VALUE! min

f)Equipment Availability:(operating time / run time x 100e/c x 100 #VALUE!

_________________________________________________________________________
PERFORMANCE (idling & minor stoppages, reduced speed)*
g)Total Parts Processed:(units per shift, good and bad) total # unit # #

h)Ideal Design Cycle Time:(minutes per unit) ____min/unit min/unit

i)Performance Efficiency:(ideal cycle time x total parts hxg/e x 10 #VALUE!

operating time x 100)
______________________________________________________________________
QUALITY (process defects, yield losses)*
j)Total Defects:(rejects and scrap) total # unit # #

k)Quality Rate:((total parts processed - total defects)/ (g-k)/g x 1 #VALUE!

total parts processed x 100)
______________________________________________________________________
OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS
m)Availability x Performance x Quality fxjxlx1 #VALUE!

Note: * examples of "big losses" in relation to OEE category

TPM Team/Leader:______________________________________________________

appendix 2 revision 01 07/06/2017

n/unit

appendix 2 revision 01 07/06/2017

 Machine downtimes

Machine: Nbr : Week:

Morning shift Afternoon shift Night shift
Time 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6
Item No
Index

Monday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Item No
Index

Tuesday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Item No
Index

Wednesday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Item No
Index

Thursday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Item No
Index

Friday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Item No
Index

Saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Item No
Index

Sunday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Causes of down-times: 1 lack of orders 4 warm up cycle, shut down 7 lack of material or energy 10 downtime of equipmnt
(Index) 2 planned maintenance 5 setup, matl change, optimizatio 8 break 11 downtime of machine
3 trial runs, debugging 6 lack of tools, personnel 9 defective tooling, maintenance

appendix 3 revision 01, 04.01.2001

 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
1orders 2mainten 3debug 4startup 5setup 6resources 7material 8break 9tooling 10equipmnt 11machine 12scrap TOTAL <== color codes need to be
MACHINE DOWNTIMES 0 2 0 1.25 0.75 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 5 identical to app1 and app2
0% 40% 0% 25% 15% 10% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
GROUP MACHINE SHIFT ITEM Nbr DAY WEEK 1orders 2mainten 3debug 4startup 5setup 6resources 7material 8break 9tooling 10equipmnt 11machine 12scrap TOTAL ENVIRONMENT TECHNICAL outage
1 01-001 3 8 001 24 27 2-Jan-01 01-01 0.5 0.5 1 1 0 0
1 01-001 1 3 020 04 01 3-Jan-01 01-01 1 1 0 0
1 01-001 1 8 001 16 29 5-Jan-01 01-01 1 0.75 1.75 0.75 0
1 01-001 2 8 001 16 29 5-Jan-01 01-01 1.25 1.25 1.25 0

appendix 4 Revision 01 07/06/2017

PROCESSBEHAVIORofTEEPperformance
avg... averageTEEPbasedonbudgetedTEEPvalues
LNPL... lowernaturalprocesslimit(avg3*sigma)
UNPL... uppernaturalprocesslimit(avg+3*sigma)

# TEEP avg LNPL UNPL "BUDGET"

========================================================
INPUT 63% 55% 72%
========================================================
JAN 61% 63% 55% 72% 65%
FEB 58% 63% 55% 72% 65%
MAR 68% 63% 55% 72% 65%
APR 70% 63% 55% 72% 70%
MAY 68% 63% 55% 72% 65%
JUN 69% 63% 55% 72% 70%
JUL 70% 63% 55% 72% 50%
AUG 56% 63% 55% 72% 70%
SEP 63% 55% 72% 50%
OCT 63% 55% 72% 70%
NOV 63% 55% 72% 50%
DEC 63% 55% 72% 70%

TEEP - total effective equipment productivity

90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
N B Y L P T V
JA FE A R A P R MA J U N JU
G
SE C O EC
M AU O N D
Site OH : total grinding operations

TEEP 2002 avg budget

lower level upper level

appendix 5 revision 01 07/06/2017