Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Judson B. Estes
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
2. Contrast
A Measurable difference in performance.
How do you measure the performance?
How Big is the difference?
3. Converge
Use Logical Strategies to isolate the candidate cause.
What split are you making?
How does that narrow the possible causes?
4. Confirm
Test the candidate cause to prove it is the true root cause.
What is your Statistical Confidence?
When can we implement the fix?
March 2014 Confidential and Proprietary to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 2
Collect Phase
Describe Problem
Identify Possible Causes
Evaluate Possible Measurements
2. Defect LOP 085032 Needs Other potential lab conclusions could have
replacement Some examined been but were not "cold shock", "high
from Field, Hot shock is the voltage" & "wear out"
main conclusion from the
Sylvania lab report
-Lord Kelvin
March 2014 Confidential and Proprietary to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 7
Contrast Phase
Required
Current
Frequency
0 1 Length (mm) 4
Required
Frequency
Current
-3 -1.5 0 1.5 3
Flushness (mm)
Driver side Passenger side 71% of returns are driver side seats
Seat back Seat cushion 92% of returns and narratives are seat cushions
Examination of returned product shows
Seam A Seam B
seam B accounts for 42 out of 54 claims
BOB/WOW seam Other
WOW cushion strategies See Strategy Diagram
Frequency
Required
Current Find and eliminate the Red X
causing open seams on the DR
front driver side leather seats
0 1 Width (mm) 4
March 2014 Confidential and Proprietary to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 9
Contrast Phase
TRIZ and
Systemology
Increased
Pure Statistics
More Variables Variation and
and Interactions Environment
Six Sigma Changes
Shainin
Critical Thinking
Ishikawa Fishbone Diagrams
Most Widely 5 Whys to the Root Cause Easiest to
Used Grasp
March 2014 Confidential and Proprietary to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 14
Concentration Diagram example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
xx
xx
B x
x
C xxx
xx
D xxx
xx
xxx
xxxx
E
x
F
Paint Craters on B pillar
.
Plotting Stage 1 Stage 2
30
WOW
* + *
Green Y = lbs.
* *
20
+
10
+ + +
* +
BOB
0
B B B C C C
Prediction of Verification of
Performance Performance
Improvement of Prediction
The best Improvement eliminates all discrepancy between prediction and reality.
Noise
Parameters XN1 . . XNn
X2 Y=f(X1,X2...) X2 Y=f(X1,X2...)
Y Defects Y
Xn Xn
Input Realistic
Selected variability Range of distribution
prototype not captured, possible of product
inputs defects masked inputs Y (CTQ)
.040
Mean = 9,726
Results:
Probability
.030
Margin mean 9,726 kg/m2
.020
Margin std dev 5,466 kg/m2 Defects
Defect probability 3.8% .010
Probability
Beam width, w 0.25 0.30 0.35 .030
Vo = 5 Vdc, +/-5%
Vin = 85 - 275 Vac
Input Filter Isolated Switching
Converter
Performance Requirements
Output voltage, Vo: 5 V, +/-5% Feedback
Input voltage, Vin: 85 - 275 V
6 quality
Low cost
V
Baseline Design o
Isolated switching converter/ OPTO R2
feedback section
Baseline design combines Vref
PWM IC
power MOSFET & control circuit R1
CTRL
R1 I
in a 3-pin package
March 2014
b 33
Confidential and Proprietary to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Statistical Design
Deterministic Design of Power Supply
Vref
Analysis: Transfer function Vo = Vref + R2 ( ____ + Ib )
R1
Results:
.019
Vo mean 5.00 volts
.009
Vo std dev 0.058 volts
Defects/million 20 (5.61) .000
4.75 4.875 5.00 5.125 5.25
March 2014 Confidential and Proprietary to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 36
Volts
Statistical Design
Reaching 6 (contd)
Design Mod 2: Mod 1 plus 0.1% Design Mod 3: Mod 2 plus LM 431AI
resistors to reduce resistor variance MOSFET to reduce Vref variance
Centered 0.1% Resistors Base 0.1% Resistors
MOSFET Upgrade
.038 .050
Probability
Probability
.028 .037
.019 .025
.009 .012
.000 .000
4.75 4.875 5.00 5.125 5.25 4.75 4.875 5.00 5.125 5.25
Volts Volts