From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Water hammer (or, more generally, fluid hammer) is a pressure surge

or wave caused when a fluid (usually a liquid but sometimes also a gas)
in motion is forced to stop or change direction suddenly (momentum
change). A water hammer commonly occurs when a valve closes
suddenly at an end of a pipeline system, and a pressure wave
propagates in the pipe. It is also called hydraulic shock.

This pressure wave can cause major problems, from noise and
vibration to pipe collapse. It is possible to reduce the effects of the
water hammer pulses with accumulators, expansion tanks, surge tanks,
and other features.

Rough calculations can be made either using the Zhukovsky

(romanised as Joukovsky or Joukowsky) equation,[1] or more accurate Effect of a pressure surge to a float gauge
ones using the method of characteristics.[2]

1 Cause and effect

1.1 Related phenomena
2 Water hammer during an explosion
3 Mitigating measures
4 The magnitude of the pulse
4.1 Instant valve closure; compressible fluid
4.1.1 Equation for wave speed
4.2 Slow valve closure; incompressible fluid
5 Expression for the excess pressure due to water hammer
6 Dynamic equations
7 Column separation
8 Simulation software
9 Applications
10 History
11 See also
12 References
13 External links

When a pipe is suddenly closed at the outlet (downstream), the mass of water before the closure is still moving, thereby
building up high pressure and a resulting shock wave. In domestic plumbing this is experienced as a loud banging,
resembling a hammering noise. Water hammer can cause pipelines to break if the pressure is high enough. Air traps or
stand pipes (open at the top) are sometimes added as dampers to water systems to absorb the potentially damaging forces
caused by the moving water.

In hydroelectric generating stations, the water travelling along the tunnel or pipeline may be prevented from entering a
turbine by closing a valve. However, if, for example, there is 14 km of tunnel of 7.7 m diameter, full of water travelling at
3.75 m/s,[3] that represents approximately 8000 megajoules of kinetic energy that must be arrested. This arresting is
frequently achieved by a surge shaft[4] open at the top, into which the water flows; as the water rises up the shaft, its
kinetic energy is converted into potential energy, which decelerates the water in the tunnel. At some HEP stations, what
looks like a water tower is actually one of these devices, known in these cases as a surge drum.
In the home, water hammer may occur when a dishwasher, washing machine, or toilet shuts off water flow. The result may
be heard as a loud bang, repetitive banging (as the shock wave travels back and forth in the plumbing system), or as some
shuddering.

On the other hand, when an upstream valve in a pipe closes, water downstream of the valve attempts to continue flowing,
creating a vacuum that may cause the pipe to collapse or implode. This problem can be particularly acute if the pipe is on a
downhill slope. To prevent this, air and vacuum relief valves, or air vents, are installed just downstream of the valve to
allow air to enter the line for preventing this vacuum from occurring.

Other causes of water hammer are pump failure, and check valve slam (due to sudden deceleration, a check valve may
slam shut rapidly, depending on the dynamic characteristic of the check valve and the mass of the water between a check
valve and tank).

Related phenomena

Steam distribution systems may also be vulnerable to a situation similar

to water hammer, known as steam hammer. In a steam system, water
hammer most often occurs when some of the steam condenses into
water in a horizontal section of the steam piping. Subsequently, steam
picks up the water, forms a "slug" and hurls it at high velocity into a
pipe fitting, creating a loud hammering noise and greatly stressing the
pipe. This condition is usually caused by a poor condensate drainage
strategy.

Where air filled traps are used, these eventually become depleted of
their trapped air over a long period of time through absorption into the
water. This can be cured by shutting off the supply, opening taps at the
highest and lowest locations to drain the system (thereby restoring air
to the traps), and then closing the taps and re-opening the supply. Expansion joints on a steam line that have been
destroyed by steam hammer

When an explosion happens in an enclosed space, water hammer can cause the walls of the container to deform. However,
it can also impart momentum to the enclosure if it is free to move. An underwater explosion in the SL-1 nuclear reactor
vessel caused the water to accelerate upwards through 0.76 m (2.5 ft) of air before it struck the vessel head at 49 m/s
(160 ft/s) with a pressure of 680 atm (69,000 kPa). This pressure wave caused the 12,000 kg (26,000 lb) steel vessel to
jump 2.77 m (9.1 ft) into the air before it dropped into its prior location.[5]

Water hammer has caused accidents and fatalities, but usually damage is limited to breakage of pipes or appendages. An
engineer should always assess the risk of a pipeline burst. Pipelines transporting hazardous liquids or gases warrant special
care in design, construction, and operation. Hydroelectric power plants especially must be carefully designed and
maintained because the water hammer can cause water pipes to fail catastrophically.

The following characteristics may reduce or eliminate water hammer:

Reduce the pressure of the water supply to the building by fitting a regulator.
Lower fluid velocities. To keep water hammer low, pipe-sizing charts for some applications recommend flow velocity
at or below 1.5 m/s (4.9 ft/s)
Fit slowly closing valves. Toilet fill valves are available in a quiet fill type that closes quietly.
High pipeline pressure rating (expensive).
Good pipeline control (start-up and shut-down procedures).
Water towers (used in many drinking water systems) help maintain steady flow rates and trap large pressure
fluctuations.
Air vessels work in much the same way as water towers, but are pressurized. They typically have an air cushion
above the fluid level in the vessel, which may be regulated or separated by a bladder. Sizes of air vessels may be up
to hundreds of cubic meters on large pipelines. They come in many shapes, sizes and configurations. Such vessels
 often are called accumulators or expansion tanks.
A hydropneumatic device similar in principle to a shock absorber called a 'Water Hammer Arrestor' can be installed
between the water pipe and the machine, to absorb the shock and stop the banging.
Air valves often remediate low pressures at high points in the pipeline. Though effective, sometimes large numbers of
air valves need be installed. These valves also allow air into the system, which is often unwanted.
Shorter branch pipe lengths.
Shorter lengths of straight pipe, i.e. add elbows, expansion loops. Water hammer is related to the speed of sound in
the fluid, and elbows reduce the influences of pressure waves.
Arranging the larger piping in loops that supply shorter smaller run-out pipe branches. With looped piping, lower
velocity flows from both sides of a loop can serve a branch.
Flywheel on pump.
Pumping station bypass.

One of the first to successfully investigate the water hammer problem

was the Italian engineer Lorenzo Allievi.

Water hammer can be analyzed by two different approachesrigid

column theory, which ignores compressibility of the fluid and elasticity
of the walls of the pipe, or by a full analysis that includes elasticity.
When the time it takes a valve to close is long compared to the
propagation time for a pressure wave to travel the length of the pipe,
then rigid column theory is appropriate; otherwise considering
elasticity may be necessary.[6] Below are two approximations for the
Typical pressure wave caused by closing a valve in a
peak pressure, one that considers elasticity, but assumes the valve
pipeline
closes instantaneously, and a second that neglects elasticity but
includes a finite time for the valve to close.

Instant valve closure; compressible fluid

The pressure profile of the water hammer pulse can be calculated from the Joukowsky equation [7]

So for a valve closing instantaneously, the maximum magnitude of the water hammer pulse is:

where P is the magnitude of the pressure wave (Pa), is the density of the fluid (kg m3), a0 is the speed of sound in the
fluid (ms1), and v is the change in the fluid's velocity (ms1). The pulse comes about due to Newton's laws of motion and
the continuity equation applied to the deceleration of a fluid element.[8]

Equation for wave speed

As the speed of sound in a fluid is , the peak pressure depends on the fluid compressibility if the valve is closed

abruptly.

where

a = wave speed
B = equivalent bulk modulus of elasticity of the system fluid-pipe
 = density of the fluid
K = bulk modulus of elasticity of the fluid
E = elastic modulus of the pipe
D = internal pipe diameter
t = pipe wall thickness
c = dimensionless parameter due to system pipe-constraint condition on wave speed[8]

Slow valve closure; incompressible fluid

When the valve is closed slowly compared to the transit time for a pressure wave to travel the length of the pipe, the
elasticity can be neglected, and the phenomenon can be described in terms of inertance or rigid column theory:

Assuming constant deceleration of the water column (dv/dt = v/t), gives:

where:

F = force, N
m = mass of the fluid column, kg
a = acceleration, m/s2
P = pressure, Pa
A = pipe cross section, m2
= fluid density, kg/m3
L = pipe length, m
v = flow velocity, m/s
t = valve closure time, s

The above formula becomes, for water and with imperial unit: P = 0.0135 V L/t. For practical application, a safety factor
of about 5 is recommended:

where P1 is the inlet pressure in psi, V is the flow velocity in ft/sec, t is the valve closing time in seconds and L is the
upstream pipe length in feet.[9]

When a valve with a volumetric flow rate Q is closed, an excess pressure P is created upstream of the valve, whose value
is given by the Joukowsky equation:

In this expression:[10]

overpressurization P is expressed in Pa;

Q is the volumetric flow in m3/s;
Z is the hydraulic impedance, expressed in kg/m4/s.

The hydraulic impedance Z of the pipeline determines the magnitude of the water hammer pulse. It is itself defined by:

with:
 the density of the liquid, expressed in kg/m3;
A cross sectional area of the pipe, m2;
B equivalent modulus of compressibility of the liquid in the pipe, expressed in Pa.

The latter follows from a series of hydraulic concepts:

compressibility of the liquid, defined by its adiabatic compressibility modulus Bl, resulting from the equation of state
of the liquid generally available from thermodynamic tables;
the elasticity of the walls of the pipe, which defines an equivalent bulk modulus of compressibility for the solid Bs. In
the case of a pipe of circular cross section whose thickness t is small compared to the diameter D, the equivalent
modulus of compressibility is given by the following formula: ; in which E is the Young's modulus (in Pa)
of the material of the pipe;
possibly compressibility Bg of gas dissolved in the liquid, defined by:
being the specific heat ratio of the gas
the rate of ventilation (the volume fraction of undissolved gas)
and P the pressure (in Pa).

Thus, the equivalent elasticity is the sum of the original elasticities:

As a result, we see that we can reduce the water hammer by:

increasing the pipe diameter at constant flow, which reduces the flow velocity and hence the deceleration of the
liquid column;
employing the solid material as tight as possible with respect to the internal fluid bulk (solid Young modulus low with
respect to fluid bulk modulus);
introducing a device that increases the flexibility of the entire hydraulic system, such as a hydraulic accumulator;
where possible, increasing the percentage of undissolved gases in the liquid.

The water hammer effect can be simulated by solving the following partial differential equations.

where V is the fluid velocity inside pipe, is the fluid density and B is the equivalent bulk modulus, f is the friction factor.

Column separation is a phenomenon that can occur during a water-hammer event. If the pressure in a pipeline drops below
the vapor pressure of the liquid, cavitation will occur (some of the liquid vaporizes, forming a bubble in the pipeline,
keeping the pressure close to the vapor pressure). This is most likely to occur at specific locations such as closed ends, high
points or knees (changes in pipe slope). When subcooled liquid flows into the space previously occupied by vapor the area
of contact between the vapor and the liquid increases. This causes the vapor to condense into the liquid reducing the
pressure in the vapor space. The liquid on either side of the vapor space is then accelerated into this space by the pressure
difference. The collision of the two columns of liquid (or of one liquid column if at a closed end) causes a large and nearly
instantaneous rise in pressure. This pressure rise can damage hydraulic machinery, individual pipes and supporting
structures. Many repetitions of cavity formation and collapse may occur in a single water-hammer event.[11]
Most water hammer software packages use the method of characteristics[8] to solve the differential equations involved.
This method works well if the wave speed does not vary in time due to either air or gas entrainment in a pipeline. The
Wave Method (WM) is also used in various software packages. WM lets operators analyze large networks efficiently.
Many commercial and non commercial packages are available.

Software packages vary in complexity, dependent on the processes modeled. The more sophisticated packages may have
any of the following features:

Multiphase flow capabilities

An algorithm for cavitation growth and collapse
Unsteady friction - the pressure waves dampens as turbulence is generated and due to variations in the flow
velocity distribution
Varying bulk modulus for higher pressures (water becomes less compressible)
Fluid structure interaction - the pipeline reacts on the varying pressures and causes pressure waves itself

The water hammer principle can be used to create a simple water pump called a hydraulic ram.
Leaks can sometimes be detected using water hammer.
Enclosed air pockets can be detected in pipelines.

Water hammer was exploited before there was even a word for it: Marcus Vitruvius Pollio describes in the 1st century B.C.
the effect of water hammer in lead pipes and stone tubes of the Roman public water supply.[12] In 1772, Englishman John
Whitehurst built a hydraulic ram for a home in Cheshire, England.[13] In 1796, French inventor Joseph Michel Montgolfier
(17401810) built a hydraulic ram for his paper mill in Voiron.[14] In French and Italian, the terms for "water hammer"
come from the hydraulic ram: coup de blier (French) and colpo dariete (Italian) both mean "blow of the ram".[15] As the
19th century witnessed the installation of municipal water supplies, water hammer became a concern to civil engineers.
[16][17] Water hammer also interested physiologists who were studying the circulatory system.[18]

Although it was prefigured in work by Thomas Young,[18] the theory of water hammer is generally considered to have
begun in 1883 with the work of German physiologist Johannes von Kries (18531928), who was investigating the pulse in
blood vessels.[19][20] However, his findings went unnoticed by civil engineers.[21][22] Kries's findings were subsequently
derived independently in 1898 by the Russian fluid dynamicist Nikolay Yegorovich Zhukovsky (18471921),[23][24] in
1898 by the American civil engineer Joseph Palmer Frizell (18321910),[25][26] and in 1902 by the Italian engineer Lorenzo
Allievi (18561941).[27]

Blood hammer
Cavitation
Fluid dynamics
Hydraulic ram makes constructive use of the water hammer effect
Hydraulophone musical instruments employing water and other fluids
Impact force
Watson's water hammer pulse

1. Kay, Melvyn (2008). Practical Hydraulics (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-415-35115-4.
2. Shu, Jian-Jun (2003). "Modelling vaporous cavitation on fluid transients". International Journal of Pressure Vessels and
Piping 80 (3): 187195. doi:10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00025-5.
 3. http://communities.bentley.com/products/hydraulics___hydrology/f/5925/p/60896/147250.aspx#147250
4. http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/73646
5. Flight Propulsion Laboratory Department, General Electric Company, Idaho Falls, Idaho (November 21, 1962), Additional
Analysis of the SL-1 Excursion: Final Report of Progress July through October 1962 (PDF), U.S. Atomic Energy Commission,
Division of Technical Information, IDO-19313 ; also TM-62-11-707
6. Bruce, S.; Larock, E.; Jeppson, R. W.; Watters, G. Z. (2000), Hydraulics of Pipeline Systems, CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-1806-8
7. Thorley, A. R. D. (2004), Fluid Transients in Pipelines (2nd ed.), Professional Engineering Publishing, ISBN 0-79180210-8
8. Streeter, V. L.; Wylie, E. B. (1998), Fluid Mechanics (International 9th Revised ed.), McGraw-Hill Higher Education
9. "Water Hammer & Pulsation" (http://www.plastomatic.com/water-hammer.html)
10. Faisandier, J., Hydraulic and Pneumatic Mechanisms, 8th edition, Dunod, Paris, 1999 (ISBN 2100499483)
11. Bergeron, L., 1950. Du Coup de Blier en Hydraulique - Au Coup de Foudre en Electricit. (Waterhammer in hydraulics and
wave surges in electricity.) Paris: Dunod (in French). (English translation by ASME Committee, New York: John Wiley & Sons,
1961.)
12. Ismaier, Andreas (2011), Untersuchung der fluiddynamischen Wechselwirkung zwischen Drucksten und
Anlagenkomponenten in Kreiselpumpensystemen [Investigation of the fluid dynamic interaction between system components
and pressure surges in centrifugal pumping systems], Schriftenreihe des Lehrstuhls fr Prozessmaschinen und Anlagentechnik,
Universitt Erlangen; Nrnberg Lehrstuhl fr Prozessmaschinen und Anlagentechnik (in German) 11, Shaker,
ISBN 978-3-8322-9779-4
13. Whitehurst, John (1775), "Account of a machine for raising water, executed at Oulton, in Cheshire, in 1772", Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London 65: 277279, doi:10.1098/rstl.1775.0026 See also plate preceding page 277.
14. Montgolfier, J. M. de (1803), "Note sur le blier hydraulique, et sur la manire den calculer les effets" [Note on the hydraulic
ram, and on the method of calculating its effects] (PDF), Journal des Mines (in French) 13 (73): 4251
15. Tijsseling, A. S.; Anderson, A. (2008), "Thomas Young's research on fluid transients: 200 years on" (PDF), Proceedings of the
10th International Conference on Pressure Surges (Edinburgh, UK): 2133 see page 22.
16. Mnabra, L. F. (1858), "Note sur les effects de choc de leau dans les conduites" [Note on the effects of water shocks in
pipes], Comptes rendus (in French) 47: 221224
17. Michaud, J. (1878), "Coups de blier dans les conduites. tude des moyens employs pour en attneur les effects" [Water
hammer in pipes. Study of means used to mitigate its effects], Bulletin de la Socit Vaudoise des Ingnieurs et des Architects
(in French) 4 (3,4): 5664, 6577
18. Tijsseling, A. S.; Anderson, A. (2008). Hunt, S., ed. "Thomas Young's research on fluid transients: 200 years on". Proc. of the
10th Int. Conf. on Pressure Surges (Edinburgh, United Kingdom: BHR Group): 2133. ISBN 978-1-85598-095-2.
19. von Kries, J. (1883), "Ueber die Beziehungen zwischen Druck und Geschwindigkeit, welche bei der Wellenbewegung in
elastischen Schluchen bestehen" [On the relationships between pressure and velocity, which exist in connection with wave
motion in elastic tubing], Festschrift der 56. Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und rzte (Festschrift of the 56th
Convention of German Scientists and Physicians) (in German) (Tbingen, Germany: Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung):
6788
20. von Kries, J. (1892), Studien zur Pulslehre [Studies in Pulse Science] (in German), Tbingen, Germany: Akademische
Verlagsbuchhandlung
21. Tijsseling, Arris S.; Anderson, Alexander (2004), "A precursor in waterhammer analysis rediscovering Johannes von Kries"
(PDF), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pressure Surges (Chester, UK): 739751
22. Tijsseling, Arris S.; Anderson, Alexander (2007), "Johannes von Kries and the history of water hammer", Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering 133 (1): 18
23. Joukowsky, N. (1898), "ber den hydraulischen Stoss in Wasserleitungsrhren" [On the hydraulic hammer in water supply
pipes], Mmoires de l'Acadmie Impriale des Sciences de St.-Ptersbourg (1900), series 8 (in German) 9 (5): 171
24. Tijsseling, Arris S.; Anderson, Alexander (2006), The Joukowsky equation for fluids and solids (PDF)
25. Frizell, J. P. (1898), "Pressures resulting from changes of velocity of water in pipes", Transactions of the American Society of
Civil Engineers 39: 118
26. Hale, R. A. (September 1911), "Obituary: Joseph Palmer Frizell, M. Am. Soc. C. E.", Transactions of the American Society of
Civil Engineers 73: 501503
27. Allievi, L. (1902), "Teoria generale del moto perturbato dell'acqua nei tubi in pressione (colpo dariete)" [General theory of the
perturbed motion of water in pipes under pressure (water hammer], Annali della Societ degli Ingegneri ed Architetti Italiani
(Annals of the Society of Italian Engineers and Architects) (in Italian) 17 (5): 285325

What is Water Hammer and Why is it Important That You Prevent it? (http://www.canarsee.com/what-is-water-
hammer)
What is Water Hammer/Steam Hammer? (http://www.tlv.com/global/TI/steam-theory/what-is-waterhammer.html)
See a youtube-animation of water hammer. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfyinDi3v-I)
YouTube- Water Hammer Theory Explained with examples (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OioX9NNHpYo)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_hammer&oldid=717185232"

Categories: Hydraulics Plumbing Irrigation

This page was last modified on 26 April 2016, at 06:41.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.