Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.jee.ro
AbstractDue to the continuous decrease of the solar cells cost, In this paper, we present a PV pumping water which
photovoltaic energy is used in different applications. The most includes photovoltaic array generator, DC/DC converter,
important one is the water pumping system powered by DC/AC converter and induction motor coupled to a centrifugal
photovoltaic generators. These systems can work with or without pump. The FLC controller is applied to ensure a a maximum
storage battery. With the increased use of this application, more operating of the photovoltaic array. And to improve the FLC
attention has been paid to their optimum utilization. Many
controller, we make a comparison with the classical MPPT,
methods have been developed to determine the maximum power
point (MPP). In this paper, to control the DC bus voltage, we the Perturb and Observ (P&O). Obtained results are presented.
apply field oriented control (FOC) strategy to induction motor
(IM) supply by a photovoltaic (PV) system. And to maximize the II. PROPOSED SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
efficiency of the proposed PV pumping system, we use the fuzzy
logic controller (FLC) and the classical Perturb and Observ
The proposed studied system is shown in Fig.1.It consists of a
(P&O). Different tests have been carried to prove the photovoltaic-pumped system, composed of a PV generator,
effectiveness of the proposed control system. DC-AC converter, a field oriented controlled induction motor
and centrifugal pump.
Keywords- Pumping Photovoltaic system, Fiel oriented
contorl, MPPT, Fuzzy logic controlle, Perturb and Observ .
A. Photovoltaic generator model
This model is characterized by a very simple resolution. It
I. INTRODUCTION requires only four parameters namely Isc, Voc, Vmp and Imp. The
Ipv-Vpv characteristic of this model is illustrated as follows:
The photovoltaic array has a unique operating point (MPP)
V pv
that can supply maximum power to the load. The locus of this I pv I sc 1 C 1 exp 1 (1)
point has a non-linear variation with solar irradiation and C 2 .V oc
temperature. Therefore, to maximize the efficiency of the With:
photovoltaic energy system, it is necessary to track the Vm
maximum power point of the PV array. Many methods and 1
V
controllers have been widely developed and implemented to C2 oc
Im
track the maximum power point (MPP) [2-6]. Most control ln( 1 )
I sc
schemes use the Perturb and Observ (P&O) method which is
Im Vm
based on iterative algorithms to track continuously the MPP, C 1 (1 ) exp( )
I sc C 2 .V oc
because it is easy to implement [2,3] but the oscillation
problem is unavoidable. In many references the effectiveness We make validation through the following experimental bench
of a fuzzy logic controller is shown [2-5] compared to the (Fig.3.)
(P&O) method. It improves control robustness and this control
gives robust performance under parameters and load variation.
Several authors present much attention to the study of the
dynamic performance of the photovoltaic pumping systems.
A. Terki and al [7] presented an analysis of the dynamic
performance of a permanent magnet brushless DC motor
controlled through a hysteresis current loop. Betka [8]
presented the performance optimization of an asynchronous
motor associated at a PV generator. Recently, vectorial
command of induction motor pumping system supplied by
photovoltaic generator was studied by Makhlouf and al [9]. In
H. Hadi [10], the photovoltaic pumping system with battery is
proposed to reduce the overheating of the motor temperature
and increase the efficiency. The battery is installed as the
storage of the surplus energy and backup energy. Fig.3. Experimental PV bench,
1
Journal of Electrical Engineering
www.jee.ro
PV
Vdc I pv
PI Vdref Varef Inverter
P pv +
Ppv Vbref
-
G1
2--3 Vcref
G3
Vpv,ref +
V pv,ref PI
V pv +
Vpv
G2
Fuzzy logic controller
+ Vqref
-
Vdcref
ia
Ib
Pref 3--2 Ic
ref
Teref Lr Iqsref
IM
PI
p.M. ref
Iqs
Pump
ref
1 Idsref Ids
M
M I qsref r s s
Tr ref
p
r
2
Journal of Electrical Engineering
www.jee.ro
Specifically, if the power panel is increased due to the Where P is the electrical power input of the motor-pump, h is
disturbance, the following disturbance will be made in the the total head and a(h), b(h), c(h), d(h) are the coefficients
same direction. And if the power decreases, the new corresponding to the working total head.
perturbation is made in the opposite direction. The advantages With: ai, bi, and di constants which depend on the type of sub-
of this method can be summarized as follows: knowledge of solar pumping system.
the characteristics of the photovoltaic generator is not The calculation of the instantaneous flow in terms of power is
required, it is relatively simple. Nevertheless, in steady state, calculated using Newton-Raphson method. Thus at the kth
the operating point oscillates around the MPP, which causes iteration, the flow Q is given by the following equation:
energy losses. The MPPT is necessary to draw the maximum For d Pa (Q)> 0:
amount of power from the PV module [8-11]. F(Q k 1 ) (4)
Q Q
k
k 1
F ' (Q k 1 )
B.2. Fuzzy logic controller
Fuzzy logic controller is introducing to determine the With:
3 2
operating point corresponding to maximum power for F(Qk 1 ) a Q k 1 b Q k 1 c Qk 1
d Pa (Qk 1 ) (12)
different insolation levels and temperature. In this case, inputs F(Qk-1) is the derivative of the function F(Qk-1)
of the fuzzy logic controller are power variation (Ppv) and We use an induction motor which is modeled using voltage
voltage variation (Vpv). The output is reference voltage and flux equations referred in a general frame:
variation (Vpv,ref). In order to converge towards the optimal d Sd
point, rules are relatively simple to establish. These rules V Sd R S I Sd
dt (5
depend on the variations of power Ppv and voltage Vpv. In d Sq
accordance with Table.3, if the power (Ppv) increased, the V Sq R I
S Sq
dt
operating point should be increased as well. However, if the Where: (Isd Isq), (Vsd, Vsq) and sd, sq) are the (d,q)
power (Ppv) decreased, the voltage (Vpv,ref ) should do the components of the stator current, voltage and flux, Rs is the
same. stator resistance.
Table.2 d Rd d
Fuzzy rule table [27]. 0 V Rd R R I Rd dt dt Rq (14)
d Rq d
Ppv BN MN SN Z SP MP BP 0 VRq R R I Rq Rd
Vpv dt dt
BN BP BP MP Z MN BN BN Where: IRd, IRq are (d,q) rotor current, Rd, Rq are (d,q) rotor
MN BP MP SP Z SN MN BN flux, Rr is the rotor resistance.
SN MP SP SP Z SN SN MN We obtain the follow mathematical model:
di ds
R P r L 2m L m .R r P r Lm
Z BN MN SN Z SP MP BP s
dt Ls Ls Lr Ls L r Ls
SP MN SN SN Z SP SP MP di qs
P L2 R P r Lm
i
L m .R r ds
r m
s i (6)
MP BN MN SN Z SP MP BP dt 1 Ls L r Ls Ls L s L r qs
L m .R s
di dr P r Lm Rr i
BP BN BN MN Z MP BP BP P. r dr
dt Ls L r Lr Lr i qr
di qr
P r Lm L m .R s R
P. r r
From these linguistic rules, the MPPT algorithm contain dt Lr Ls Lr Lr
measurement of variation of photovoltaic power Ppv and
1
0
variation of photovoltaic voltage Vpv proposes a variation of Ls
1
0
the voltage reference Vpv,ref according to eq.2. 1
Ls v ds
L m 0 v qs
Ppv Ppv ( k ) Ppv ( k 1) L s .L r
(2) L
Vpv Vpv (k ) Vpv ( k 1) 0 m
V L s .L r
pv ref ( k ) Vpv (k 1) Vpv ref ( k ) With: is the leakage coefficient
Where:Ppv(k) and Vpv(k) are the power and voltage of the -The mechanical equation is given as:
photovoltaic generator at sampled times (k), and Vpv,ref (k) the
d r (7)
instant of reference voltage Tem TLoad J .
dt
C. Modeling subsystem pumping With: r is the AC motor velocity angular, J the inertia of the
Many different varieties of pumps are used with PV-pumping AC motor.
system. In our case, we use the model expresses the water The electromagnetic torque can be written as:
flow output (Q) directly as a function of the electrical power Tem P.(sd .is q sq .isd ) (8)
input (P) to the motor-pump, for different total heads. A
polynomial fit of the third order expresses the relationship III. FIELD ORIENTED CONTROL
between the flow rate and power input, as described by the
In our work, we choose the orientation of rotor flux such as:
following equation [6, 7]:
P(Q, h) a(h)Q 3 b(h)Q 2 c(h)Q d (h) (3) rd = r and rq = 0. This means that the flux r is
3
Journal of Electrical Engineering
www.jee.ro
state for the two MPPT methods (Table 3.). We use the Ec E c d .Pd 5.16kWh / day
following expressions: Pg Pg
Ec
1.94 kW
p 1
pertes
Ppvmax . madele .lectrique Ppvmax N pv Ppv max N pv 18pannels
p % 100 Ns
N pv
Pmax t
Ppvmax .madele .lectrique I Ns 6pannels
N paralel m
(17) N paralel I opt N paralel 3
4
Journal of Electrical Engineering
www.jee.ro
80
expressions: 20
qv ( dsir ) Qmppt 0
0 0 .2 0 .4 0.6 0 .8 1
t (s)
1 .2 1.4 1 .6 1 .8 2
0 .7
P 0 .5
% h 100
flux (Web)
0 .4 r f r e nc e
Pmec 0 .3
es ti m
(21)
We can remark, that MPPT strategies improve the pumping 0 .2
to track the Maximum Power Point (MPP). Fig.8 Rotor flux rd for(1000W/m and 500W/m2) 2
1200
10
1100
8
1000
6
900 4
Eclairement (W/m 2)
800 2
700 0
h=6m -2
600
h=12m
h=9m
-4
500
-6
400
-8
300
1 1.5 2 2. 5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Dbit (m3 /s)
-3 -10
x 10 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
t (s)
Fig.6 Water Flow for different heads Fig.9 Stator currents for (1000W/m2 and 500W/m2)
5
Journal of Electrical Engineering
www.jee.ro
10
8
The FLC measures instantaneously PV voltage and current
Is d
7
Is q
variations and determines quickly the optimal increment
6
required to have the operating voltage for tracking the MPP
courant (A)
5
even when the operating environmental conditions change
4
3
rapidly. Fig. 10 shows the DC voltage waveform in the output
2
of the DC converter. We note that the DC bus voltage kept
1 constant and follows its reference Vdcref whatever insolation
0
0 0.2 0.4 0 .6 0.8 1
t (s)
1.2 1 .4 1.6 1 .8 2 variations.
Fig.10 Currents waveforms Id,iq
18
16
VI. CONCLUSION
14
In this paper, we have applied two MPPT methods (P&O, and
12
10
FLC) to a photovoltaic pumping system with field oriented
control (FOC). An application is made to satisfy water needs
couple (N.m)
0
and speed to reach the maximum power point
-2
0 0.2 0 .4 0 .6 0.8 1 1 .2 1.4 1.6 1 .8 2
t (s)
250
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39 (3) , pp. 1604-1611.
dc
100
With FLC Y, Maximum power point tracking using adaptive fuzzy logic
50
Without MPPT control for grid connected photovoltaic system. Renewable
0
Energy, vol. 30, no.11, 2005, pp.1771-1788
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
460
t (s)
[7] Terki A., Moussi A., Betka A., Terki N., An improved
efficiency of fuzzy logic control of PMBLDC for PV pumping
450
system, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol.36, no.3, pp.
934944, 2012.
440 [8] Betka A. and Moussi A., Performance Optimization of a
Photovoltaic Induction Motor Pumping System, Renewable
430 Energy, vol. 29, pp. 2167 2181, 2004.
[9] Makhlouf M., Messai F., Benalla H., vectorial command of
induction motor pumping system supplied by a photovoltaic
Fig.13. DC bus voltage generator, journal of electrical engineering, vol. 62, no.1, pp:
310, 2011.
[10] Rekioua D, Matagne E., Optimisation of Photovoltaic Power
Systems: Modelization, Simulation and Control, Springer 2012.
[11] Rekioua D., Achour A.Y., Rekiouaa T., Tracking power
photovoltaic system with sliding mode control strategy, (2013)
Energy Procedia, 36 , pp. 219-230.