You are on page 1of 5

Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011) 742746

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Personality and Individual Differences


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid

The relationship between adult romantic attachment anxiety,


negative life events, and compliance
Kim E. Drake , David Shefeld, Deborah Shingler
Department of Psychology, University of Derby, UK

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: This study investigates the role of attachment anxiety and the experience of intense life adversity in the
Received 5 October 2010 development of compliance. It also seeks to specify which types of negative life events may be especially
Received in revised form 16 December 2010 relevant in encouraging compliant behaviour, and whether gender may moderate this effect. Participants
Accepted 24 December 2010
(N = 125) completed the Gudjonsson Compliance Scale, the Life Events Questionnaire and the Relation-
ship Scale Questionnaire. Contrary to previous research, attachment anxiety and the reported experience
of intense negative life events appear to be associated with signicantly lower compliance scores. Gender
Keywords:
appears not to moderate this relationship. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses show that inter-per-
Psychological vulnerability
Psychological resilience
sonal negative life events and attachment anxiety together predict lower compliance scores. This is the
Compliance rst study to show that adult romantic attachment anxiety and the experience of intense negative life
Attachment anxiety events can also lead to psychological resilience, reducing the probability of false confessions and state-
Life adversity ments during police interview.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction Judith Ward, and Alfred Allen among others), yet are the least
well understood in terms of how such individuals have come
The Memorandum of Good Practice (1992) and the Home Ofce to be malleable and less able to cope with the pressure of ques-
guidelines on Achieving Best Evidence (2002, 2008) have lead to a tioning (Gudjonsson, 2010).
gradual shift in interviewing practice within England and Wales. The aim of this paper is to investigate the background factors of
Despite this change for the better though, psychological vulnera- interviewees that may increase the risk of developing compliant
bility during police interview may still be an issue (Kebbell & tendencies. It specically focuses on investigating the relationship
Gilchrist, 2004). Concern has also been expressed regarding the between attachment anxiety, the reported experience of intense
use of external pressure during police questioning in countries be- negative life events and compliance, and examines which types
yond the United Kingdom (e.g. the interviewer indicating that of negative life events may be especially relevant (e.g. indepen-
some responses are wrong; Milne & Bull, 1999). While some of dent, dependent and/or personal negative life events). This will
the police forces are now trying to reduce the use of inappropriate add to previous research into compliance (see Gudjonsson et al.,
tactics, robust questioning/interviewing linked to compliant 2008) and allow environmental factors, important in the develop-
behaviour and false statements and confessions may still be com- ment of compliant tendencies, to become more specied (Jaffee &
monplace in many countries (Bull & Milne, 2004; Kassin et al., Price, 2007).
2010a, 2010b). Research shows that psychologically vulnerable individuals
Compliance can be a serious psychological vulnerability dur- (including those scoring high on interrogative suggestibility and
ing interview (Gudjonsson, 2003; Gudjonsson, Sigurdsson, Lyds- compliance) seem to have an endogenous tendency towards
dottir, & Olafsdottir, 2008). Research into understanding the heightened distress and to score high on attachment anxiety (see
pathways to and specic indicators of compliance is required, Donnellan et al., 2007; Drake, 2010b; Gudjonsson et al., 2008).
as such work will open up avenues for the development of im- Attachment behaviour is mainly concerned with the maintenance
proved interventions and psychological assessment methods for of emotional, psychological and physical closeness with a signi-
the police and courts. Suspects scoring high on compliance, cant other person (Bowlby, 1988). Attachment anxiety (manifest
who ended up being wrongfully convicted, have presented them- in high preoccupied-anxious attachment and fearful-avoidant
selves throughout history (e.g. Birmingham Six, Guildford Four, attachment scores; see Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991; Grifn &
Bartholomew, 1994) is related to low self-esteem, a negative
Corresponding author. Address: University of Derby, Department of Psychology, self-perception and high levels of inter-personal difculties
Kedleston Road, Derby DE22 1GB, UK. (Cyranowski et al., 2002; Feldman Barrett, 1997; Simpson, Rholes,
E-mail address: k.drake@derby.ac.uk (K.E. Drake). & Phillips, 1996).

0191-8869/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.034
K.E. Drake et al. / Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011) 742746 743

Attachment anxious behaviour can draw out negativity from negative life events. This gender effect needs therefore to be
the environment and increase the likelihood of individuals experi- investigated.
encing negative life events (Jaffee & Price, 2007; Scarr & McCartney,
1983). Genetic studies have shown that these adverse experiences 1.1. Predictions
can subsequently reafrm such characteristics culminating in the
anticipation of (and sensitivity to) adverse environments (see Re- Attachment anxiety (manifest in preoccupied-anxious attach-
iss, 2010 for a review of the literature). Compliance may be a ment and fearful-avoidant attachment scores) and the experience
coping mechanism, employed by such individuals, during tasks of intense negative life events will correlate with and predict com-
or dyadic interactions perceived as stressful (Costa & McCrae, pliance in both males and females.
1992). The reported experience of dependent and inter-personal nega-
Attachment anxiety and the experience of negative life events tive life events will be more strongly related to attachment anxiety
have already been implicated in the development of a suggestible and compliance (compared with independent negative life events).
character. Signicant correlations have been reported between
attachment anxiety, the reporting of intense negative life events,
2. Method
and interrogative suggestibility (Drake, 2010b) and between the
report of intense negative life events and interrogative suggestibil-
2.1. Participants
ity (Drake, 2010a; Drake, Bull, & Boon, 2008). Studies in this area so
far suggest that attachment anxiety and the experience of intense
The sample consisted of 125 participants, 61 females and 64
negative life events may contribute to a lesser ability to cope with
males (mean age = 40.27, standard deviation = 11.61, range = 18
the pressure of police questioning. Therefore attachment anxiety
64 years). Participants are an opportunity sample, consisting of
and the experience of intense negative life events may also relate
staff and students within a UK university.
to compliant behaviour. To date no research has investigated the
relationship between attachment anxiety, the experience of in-
tense negative life events and compliance. 2.2. Instruments
The specic types of negative life events most associated with
attachment anxiety and conducive to bringing about compliant 2.2.1. The Gudjonsson Compliance Scale (GCS) (Gudjonsson, 1989)
behaviour will also be investigated. Negative life events can be This 20-item, true/false, instrument measures the extent to
split into categories: independent, dependent, and inter-personal which individuals tend to comply with others requests. Scores
negative events (see Jaffee & Price, 2007). Independent negative range from 0 to 20. The scale was originally developed for two rea-
events include the death of a loved one, losing ones home in a nat- sons: (i) to identify those individuals who may be more likely to
ural disaster; whilst dependent negative events are heritable, con- make false confessions under pressure during interview; and (ii)
trollable, and dependent upon a persons behaviour (e.g. losing to identify individuals who are more likely to be coerced into crime
your job, getting divorced). Inter-personal negative life events are by peers and others. Scale validity is well documented (see
specic type of dependent negative events and refer solely to in- Gudjonsson, 2003), with Cronbachs alpha coefcient in past stud-
ter-personal difculties (i.e. relationship issues, conicts with ies ranging from 0.71 to 0.75.
friends, co-workers, and family).
Dependent and inter-personal negative events (compared with 2.2.2. Life Events Questionnaire (LEQ) (Norbeck, 1984)
independent negative events) are associated with a range of psy- The LEQ contains 82-items in total and is a modication of the
chological vulnerabilities such as depression, anxiety, and a lesser instrument developed by Sarason, Johnson, and Siegel (1978), in
ability to cope with social challenge (Eley et al., 2004; Jaffee & that it has nine items of particular relevance to women. These in-
Price, 2007). Individuals who score high on attachment anxiety clude items such as Major difculties with birth control pills or
(neuroticism and negative emotionality being a feature of this) devices. The nine additional items in the LEQ were introduced
may be prone to the experience of dependent and inter-personal to reduce the gender bias in the Sarason et al. (1978) version.
stressful life events (e.g. conict within romantic relationships, The 82 different life events can be categorised into the follow-
with colleagues and with friends). ing: independent life events, dependent life events, and inter-per-
Characteristics (such as attachment anxiety) can have a lasting sonal life events. Independent negative events include the death of
effect on the social environment, evoking hostile and critical re- a loved one, losing ones home in a natural disaster; whilst depen-
sponses and [negatively] inuencing life choices. Inter-personal dent negative events are heritable, controllable, and dependent
negative experiences can amplify those attachment anxious char- upon a persons behaviour (e.g. losing your job, getting divorced).
acteristics, conrm negative self-perceptions, and encourage a fear Inter-personal negative life events are a particular type of depen-
of abandonment (Brennan & Shaver, 2002; Brown, Harris, & Biful- dent negative events, and include adverse events that occur during
co, 1986; Reiss, 2010). This fear of abandonment and emotional dyadic interaction (e.g. inter-personal conicts, relationship break-
rejection, encouraged through the experience of negative inter- ups) (Jaffee & Price, 2007).
personal events, may lead to an increased risk of compliance Participants were required to go through all the events listed,
(Gudjonsson et al., 2008). No research exists investigating this par- and if they had experienced them at any point of their life, to circle
ticular issue. whether it had been a good experience or bad experience. They
The study by Gudjonsson et al. (2008) suggests however that were then instructed to rate the extent to which those events had
the relationship between adult romantic attachment anxiety and an effect on their lives at the time. The ratings went from 0 (no
avoidance and compliance may be specic to females (by virtue effect) to 3 (large effect). The LEQ has good testretest reliabil-
of recruiting a female sample). Males scoring high on attachment ity, with testretest reliabilities of 0.780.83 and is a signicant
anxiety also experience problematic relationships, negative events, predictor of measures of (unfavourable) psychological and psychi-
and are stress-sensitive (Kirkpatrick & Davis, 1994). Studies show atric symptoms.
that men are more sensitive to the effects of divorce or separation The questionnaire was originally designed to examine life
and work problems (Kendler, Thornton, & Prescott, 2001). There- events experienced over the past year. However, research has
fore research suggests that men can also become psychologically shown the importance of studying life events during adolescence,
vulnerable as a result of the experience of [dependent] personal as this period is characterized by many physical, social and
744 K.E. Drake et al. / Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011) 742746

cognitive changes (Cohen, Burt, & Bjorck, 1987). In view of this and 4. Results
past research (Drake, Bull, & Boon, 2008; Drake, 2010a, 2010b), it
was deemed more appropriate to examine events spanning the en- 4.1. Descriptive statistics
tire life of the individual. Participants were instructed to read
through the events listed, and mark the ones that have occurred Tables 1 and 2 presents the means and standard deviations for
throughout your whole life, not just the past year. the observed variables. The normality of the data was checked,
revealing univariate normality for the GCS, LEQ and RSQ scores.

2.2.3. The Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ) (Grifn &


Bartholomew, 1994) 4.2. Pearsons correlations
The RSQ contains 30-items. For each item on the RSQ, partici-
pants have to rate on a ve point scale the extent to which each Table 1 shows the zero order correlations between the mea-
statement best describes their behaviour in close relationships. sured variables. Results indicate signicant negative relationships
Out of the 30-items, ve contribute to secure attachment, ve to between compliance scores and the reported experience of more
dismissing attachment patterns (high scores denoting attachment intense negative life events (total), the reported experience of more
avoidance), four to fearful-avoidant attachment patterns (indicat- intense dependent negative life events, and the reported experi-
ing high levels of both attachment anxiety and avoidance), and ence of more intense inter-personal negative life events. The re-
four to preoccupied-anxious attachment patterns (high attach- sults show that compliance scores are most strongly correlated
ment anxiety). with the reported experience of intense inter-personal negative life
Attachment avoidance is shown by the degree of discomfort events. Compliance scores also relate negatively to preoccupied-
with inter-personal closeness and relationships and a propensity anxious attachment scores (high attachment anxiety) and fearful-
towards self-reliance. Attachment anxiety is characterised by a avoidant attachment scores (both high attachment anxiety and
preoccupation with relationships. Attachment anxious individuals avoidance scores).
are prone to jealously, clinging behaviour with partners, and a fear Considering the Gudjonsson et al. (2008) study suggesting a
of abandonment. In view of past research showing the role of gender difference (through testing only female participants) and
attachment anxiety in particular in predicting interrogative sug- in view of the evidence provided in the current introduction that
gestibility (Drake, 2010b) and compliance (Gudjonsson et al., males may also be susceptible to the [adverse] effects of the expe-
2008), this study focuses on the preoccupied-anxious (high attach- rience of inter-personal negative life events (Kendler et al., 2001;
ment anxiety) and fearful-avoidant (high attachment anxiety and Kirkpatrick & Davis, 1994), the issue of gender difference was
avoidance) subscales of the RSQ. Table 1 shows good internal reli- investigated. A formal test of difference between independent cor-
ability scores for both subscales. relations was conducted. Table 2 shows the resultant chi-square
values, demonstrating that the differences in correlation magni-
tude across gender are not statistically signicant. There is no evi-
3. Procedure dence of a gender difference in these relationships.

Participants completed an online questionnaire survey consist-


ing of the GCS, LEQ and RSQ. The hyperlink to the questionnaire 4.3. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis
study was distributed via email and through online forums within
the University. Participants had to click on the hyperlink which To investigate the extent to which the reported experience of
took them to the consent page. Once consent had been given, par- IPNLE and attachment anxiety contributed to the variance in com-
ticipants gained access to the questionnaires. Only those who com- pliance scores, a hierarchical multiple regression analysis was con-
pleted the consent form were taken to the questionnaires. This ducted using forced entry methods. Preliminary analyses were
method has been used successfully by other studies collecting data conducted to ensure no violation of the assumptions of normality,
online (such as those reviewed in the study by Meyerson & Tryon, linearity, and homoscedasticity. The collinearity diagnostics were
2003). adequate (minimum tolerance = .36) in all of the regression analy-
Meyerson and Tryon (2003) demonstrated in a study into the ses. Age was entered into the rst block, PAA into the second and
psychometric equivalency of web-based research that computer IPNLE into the third. Table 3 shows that both models 2 and 3 are
and uncontrollable administration of questionnaires does not seem statistically signicant. Preoccupied-anxious attachment, fearful-
to adversely affect the quality of results. Data collection via the avoidant attachment and the experience of intense inter-personal
web is benecial for a number of reasons: (1) it is reliable, (2) valid, negative life event scores together contribute to the variance in
(4) cost effective, and (5) efcient. compliance scores. This effect is in the negative direction.

Table 1
Means, standard deviations, Cronbach Alpha, and zero order correlation coefcients among observed variables.

M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
GCS 10.5 4.07 0.19 0.11 0.19 0.21 0.24 0.19
NLE 25.6 17.9 0.82 0.97 0.93 0.32 0.25
INLE 11.9 8.69 0.76 0.63 0.21 0.20
DNLE 32.9 22.3 0.95 0.29 0.21
IPNLE 21.1 15.5 0.31 0.22
PAA 10.8 3.16 0.32
FAA 9.94 3.73
Cronbach alpha 0.80 0.79 0.78 0.79 0.79 0.83 0.81

Note: N = 125. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; NLE = negative life events (in general); three specic negative life event variables: INLE = independent negative Life events;
DNLE = dependent negative life events; IPNLE = inter-personal negative life events. PAA = preoccupied-anxious attachment; FAA = fearful-avoidant attachment. p < .05,

p < .01, and p < .001.


K.E. Drake et al. / Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011) 742746 745

Table 2 ture (see Beasley, Thompson, & Davidson, 2003; Reiss, 2010):
Zero order correlation coefcients across gender with corresponding chi-square Cognitive hardiness within a proportion of participants scoring
values.
high on attachment anxiety and negative life events may explain
M SD GCS NLE INLE DNLE PNLE PAA FAA this resilience. Resilience to adversity is also seen in individuals
Females scoring high on trait anxiety (Kashdan & Kane, 2011). A polymor-
GCS 10.1 3.99 .263 .142 .306 .323 .267 .348 phism in the serotonin transporter gene has been found to moder-
Males ate the effect of life stress on subsequent psychological
GCS 10.9 4.12 .089 .030 .063 .095 .219 .049
{2 .973 .390 1.92 1.72 .093 2.94
vulnerability (Caspi et al., 2003). There is therefore theoretical evi-
dence supporting these contradictory ndings and a [genetic] het-
Note: For females: N = 61; for males N = 64. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; erogeneous response to adversity. This could account for the lower
GCS = Gudjonsson compliance scale [scores]; NLE = negative life events (in general);
compliance levels in a proportion of individuals.
three specic negative life event variables; INLE = independent negative life events;
DNLE = dependent negative life events; IPNLE = inter-personal negative life events. The second nding to emerge is that the experience of intense
PAA = preoccupied-anxious attachment; FAA = fearful-avoidant attachment. inter-personal negative life events (e.g. family dynamics, bullying,

p < .05, p < .01, and p < .001. romantic relationship and friendship breakdown; see Jaffee &
Price, 2007), preoccupied-anxious attachment and fearful-avoidant
Table 3 attachment scores together contribute signicantly to the variance
Hierarchical multiple regression analysis for psychological variables predicting in psychological resilience. This notion is consistent with evidence
compliance. from the clinical psychological and developmental psychopatho-
Predictor variable Beta t-value Adjusted R2 logical literature (for examples see Eley et al., 2004; Kim &
Cicchetti, 2006). High attachment anxiety correlates with the expe-
Block 1
Age .017 .190 .008
rience of stressful inter-personal events (which reinforces the
F(1, 122) = .036 attachment anxious behaviour) leading to, in a proportion of indi-
Block 2 viduals, a greater resilience and a lesser tendency to become com-
Age .009 .104 .049 pliant during dyadic interactions (i.e. a police interview).
PAA .197 2.13 F(3, 120) = 3.12
It seems therefore that the reported experience of inter-per-
FAA .131 1.41
sonal negative life events is also important in the development of
Block 3 psychological resilience (see Table 3). This effect occurs in both
Age .006 .073 .059 males and females. The current ndings provide no evidence of
PAA .160 1.67 F(4, 119) = 2.92 gender moderating the relationship between attachment anxiety,
FAA .111 1.18
IPNLE .139 1.49
the experience of inter-personal negative life events and
compliance.
Note: N = 125. IPNLE = inter-personal negative life events. PAA = preoccupied-anx-
ious attachment; FAA = fearful-avoidant attachment. p < .05, p < .01, and

p < .001. 5.1. Limitations and tentative conclusion

In model 2 PAA scores make a signicant contribution to the There are some limitations to this study. First, the online nature
variance in compliance scores; this is not the case in model 3. In of the data collection may raise questions as to the quality of the
model 3 none of the variables make a statistically signicant un- data; studies show though that web-based research is as reliable
ique contribution to the regression model. as in person research (Meyerson & Tryon, 2003). Despite the con-
trary ndings, this study managed to replicate the positive correla-
tion between attachment anxiety and the reported experience of
5. Discussion more intense negative life events (this relationship was found in
a previous study where participants completed the questionnaires
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship be- within a controlled environment and in person; Drake, 2010b).
tween the experience of intense life adversity, attachment anxiety This corroborative nding suggests that the online data collection
and compliance. It also sought insight into which types of negative method may not have had a detrimental impact on the quality of
life events may especially be relevant to encouraging compliant the data. An additional source of limitation may be the use of staff
behaviour. Some interesting albeit unexpected ndings emerged: and students within the University, which Caspi (1998) remarked
First, results demonstrate that attachment anxiety, the experi- is potentially the Achilles heel in psychology.
ence of intense negative life events and compliance are signicantly Although the effect sizes are small to medium, the ndings
correlated. This seems to resonate with the Gudjonsson et al. (2008) within this study are important. They suggest that attachment anx-
study showing a signicant relationship between romantic attach- iety and the experience of intense negative life events (those of the
ment anxiety and avoidance and compliance. What was interesting inter-personal nature in particular) may also lead to psychological
though is that the signicant relationship emerged in the opposite resilience during police interview. These current ndings resonate
direction. Attachment anxiety and the reported experience of in- with studies within the social psychological and behaviour genetic
tense negative life events appear to have signicantly increased eld (Beasley et al., 2003; Caspi et al., 2003; Kashdan & Kane, 2011;
the risk of psychological resilience (i.e. lower compliance scores). Reiss, 2010). Genetically informed studies should now be con-
Research up until now has shown that individuals scoring high ducted to investigate the theories that have emerged from these
on attachment anxiety who then experience intense negative contrary results, in order to further inform our understanding of
events become psychologically vulnerable (e.g. Drake, 2010a,b; what drives the heterogeneous reaction to negative life events, to
Drake, Bull, & Boon, 2008; Gudjonsson et al., 2008). This study is uncover the valid indicators of compliant behaviour.
the rst to now provide contrary ndings. Web-based research
has been shown to yield reliable ndings (Meyerson & Tryon,
2003). The instruments used also demonstrate good internal reli- References
ability coefcients.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults:
Although these ndings are unexpected, there is evidential sup- A test of a four category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61,
port from the social psychological and behavioural genetics litera- 226244.
746 K.E. Drake et al. / Personality and Individual Differences 50 (2011) 742746

Beasley, M., Thompson, T., & Davidson, J. (2003). Resilience in response to life stress: Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A
The effects of coping style and cognitive hardiness. Personality and Individual handbook. Chichester: Wiley.
Differences, 34, 7795. Gudjonsson, G. H. (2010). Invited article: Psychological vulnerabilities during police
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: interviews. Why are they important? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15,
Routledge. 116.
Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2002). Attachment styles and personality disorders: Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Lydsdottir, L. B., & Olafsdottir, H. (2008). The
Their connections to each other and to parental divorce, parental death, and relationship between adult romantic attachment and compliance. Personality
perceptions of parental care-giving. Journal of Personality, 66, 835878. and Individual Differences, 45, 276280.
Brown, G. W., Harris, T., & Bifulco, A. (1986). Long term effects of early loss of parent. Home Ofce, 2002. (2002). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance
In M. Rutter, C. Izard, & P. Read (Eds.), Depression in childhood. New York: for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses including children. London: Author.
Guilford Press. Home ofce, 2008. (2008). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance
Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2004). Attempts to improve police interviewing of suspects. In for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses. London: Author including children
G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions and entrapment. New York: (updated).
Plenum. Jaffee, S. R., & Price, T. S. (2007). Gene-environment correlations: A review of the
Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In W. Damon (Ed.), evidence and implications for the prevention of mental illness. Molecular
Handbook of child psychology, vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality Psychiatry, 12, 432442.
development (5th ed., pp. 311388). New York: Wiley. Kashdan, T. B., & Kane, J. Q. (2011). Post-traumatic distress and the presence of post-
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moftt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., et al. (2003). traumatic growth and the meaning of life: Experiential avoidance as a
Inuence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5- moderator. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 8489.
HTT gene. Science, 301, 386389. Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. P.
Cohen, L. H., Burt, C. E., & Bjorck, J. P. (1987). Life stress and adjustment: Effects of (2010a). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law
life events experienced by young adolescents and their parents. Developmental and Human Behavior., 34, 338.
Psychology, 23, 583592. Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. P.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO -PIR) (2010b). Police induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations:
and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Looking ahead. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 4952.
Psychological Assessment Resources. Kebbell, M. R., & Gilchrist, E. L. (2004). The psychology of cross-examination. In J.
Cyranowski, J. M., Bookwala, J., Houck, P., Pilkonis, P., Kostelnik, B., & Ellen, F. (2002). Adler (Ed.), Forensic psychology (pp. 8195). Cullompton: Willan.
Adult attachment proles, interpersonal difculties, and response to Kendler, K. S., Thornton, L. M., & Prescott, C. A. (2001). Gender differences in the
interpersonal psychotherapy in women with recurrent major depression. rates of exposure to stressful life events and sensitivity to their depressogenic
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 191217. effects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 587593.
Donnellan, M. B., Assad, K. K., Robins, R. W., & Conger, R. D. (2007). Do negative Kim, J., & Cicchetti, D. (2006). Longitudinal trajectories of self-system processes and
interactions mediate the effects of negative emotionality, communal positive depressive symptoms among maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Child
emotionality, and constraint on relationship satisfaction? Journal of Social and Development, 77, 624639.
Personal Relationships, 24, 557573. Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship
Drake, K. E. (2010a). Interrogative suggestibility: Life adversity, neuroticism and stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,
compliance. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 493498. 502512.
Drake, K. E. (2010b). The psychology of interrogative suggestibility: A vulnerability Meyerson, P., & Tryon, W. W. (2003). Validating internet research: A test of
during interview. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 683688. psychometric equivalence of internet and in-person samples. Behavior Research
Drake, K. E., Bull, R., & Boon, J. C. W. (2008). Interrogative suggestibility, self-esteem, Methods, Instruments and Computers, 35, 614620.
and the inuence of negative life events. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice.
299310. Chichester: Wiley.
Eley, T. C., Liang, H., Plomin, R., Sham, P., Sterne, A., Williamson, R., et al. (2004). Norbeck, J. S. (1984). Modication of life event questionnaires for use with female
Parental familial vulnerability, family environment, and their interactions as respondents. Research in Nursing Health, 7, 6171.
predictors of depressive symptoms in adolescents. Journal of the American Reiss, D. (2010). Genetic thinking in the study of social relationships: Five points of
Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 298306. entry. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 502515.
Feldman Barrett, L. (1997). The relationships among momentary emotion Sarason, I., Johnson, J., & Siegel, J. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes:
experiences, personality descriptions, and retrospective ratings of emotions. Development of the life experiences survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 11001110. Psychology, 46, 932946.
Grifn, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A
dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and story of genotypeenvironment effects. Child Development, 54, 424435.
Social Psychology, 67(3), 430445. Simpson, J. S., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conict in close relationships: An
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71,
Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 535540. 899914.

You might also like