Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. SOIL NAILING
Project lebuh raya usaha sama Berhad (PLUS Berhad) is widening the existing dual-3-lane
carriageway into dual 4-lane carriageway from Shah Alam interchange to Jalan Duta Toll
Plaza, Bukit Lanjan to Rawang interchange and Nilai Utara interchange to Seremban
interchange (including south bound toward Port Dickson interchange). The total length of the
widening project is 63.3 km. the project is scheduled to be completed in December 2014
Methods
Step 3. Install and grout nail Step 4. Place temporary pacing (include
(includes strip drain shotcrete, reinforcement, bearing plate,
installation hex nut and washers installation
Initial excavation is carried out to a depth for which the face of the excavation has the
ability to remain unsupported for a short period of time, typically on the order of 24 to
48 hours. The depth of the excavation lift is usually between 1 and 2m (3 and 6 ft) and
reaches slightly below the elevation where nails will be installed. The width of the
excavated platform or bench must be sufficient to provide access to the installation
equipment.
Drill holes are drilled to a specified length, diameter, inclination, and horizontal
spacing from this excavated platform.
Nail bars are placed in the pre-drilled hole. The bars are most commonly solid,
although hollow steel nails can be also used have seen increased usage. Centralizers
are placed around the nails prior to insertion to help maintain alignment within the
hole and allow sufficient protective grout coverage over the nail bar. A grout pipe
(tremie) is also inserted in the drill hole at this time. When corrosion protection
requirements are high, corrugated plastic sheathing can also be used to provide an
additional level of corrosion protection. The drill hole is then filled with cement grout
through the tremie pipe. The grout is commonly placed under gravity or low pressure.
If hollow self-drilling bars are used (only as temporary structures), the drilling and
grouting take place in one operation. Prior to Step 4 (facing placement), geocomposite
drainage strips are installed on the excavation face approximately midway between
each set of adjacent nails. The drainage strips are the nunrolled to the next wall lift.
The drainage strips extend to the bottom of the excavation where collected water is
conveyed via a toe drain away from the soil nail wall.
A temporary facing system is then constructed to support the open-cut soil section
before the next lift of soil is excavated.The most typical temporary facing consists of a
lightly reinforced shotcrete layer commonly 100 mm (4 in.) thick. The reinforcement
typically consists of welded wiremesh (WWM), which is placed at approximately the
middle of the facing thickness (see lower part of Figure 2.1). The length of the WWM
must be such that it allows at least one full mesh cell to overlap with subsequent
WWM panels. Following appropriate curing time for the temporary facing, a steel
bearing plate is placed over the nail head protruding from the drill hole. The bar is
then lightly pressed into the first layer of fresh shotcrete. A hex nut and washers are
subsequently installed to secure the nail head against the bearing plate. The hex nut is
tightened to a required minimum torque after the temporary facing has sufficiently
cured. This usually requires a minimum of 24hours. If required, testing of the installed
nails to measure deflections (for comparisonto a pre-specified criterion) and proof load
capacities may be performed prior to proceeding with the next excavation lift. Before
proceeding with subsequentexcavation lifts, the shotcrete must have cured for at least
72 hours or have attained atleast the specified 3-day compressive strength [typically
10.5 MPa (1,500 psi).
Steps 1 through 4 are repeated for the remaining excavation lifts. At each excavation
lift, the vertical drainage strip is unrolled downward to the subsequent lift. A new
panel of WWM is then placed overlapping at least one full mesh cell. The temporary
shotcrete is continued with a cold joint with the previous shotcrete lift. At the bottom
of the excavation, the drainage strip is tied to a collecting toe drain.
After the bottom of the excavation is reached and nails are installed and load tested, a
final facing may be constructed. Final facing may consist of cast-in-place (CIP)
reinforced concrete, reinforced shotcrete, or prefabricated panels. The reinforcement
of permanent facing is conventional concrete bars or WWM. When CIP concrete and
shotcrete are used for the permanent facing, horizontal joints between excavation lifts
are avoided to the maximum extent possible
Advantages of Soil Nail Walls
Soil nail walls exhibit numerous advantages when compared to ground anchors and
alternative top-down construction techniques. Some of these advantages are described below:
Construction
requires smaller ROW than ground anchors as soil nails are typically shorter;
less disruptive to traffic and causes less environmental impact compared to other
construction techniques;
there is no need to embed any structural element below the bottom of excavation as with
soldier beams used in ground anchor walls;
installation of soil nail walls is relatively rapid and uses typically less construction materials
than ground anchor walls;
easy adjustments of nail inclination and location can be made when obstructions (e.g.,
cobbles or boulders, piles or underground utilities) are encountered; on the other hand, the
horizontal position of ground anchors is more difficult to modify almost making adjustments
in the field costly;
because significantly more soil nails are used than ground anchors, adjustments to the design
layout of the soil nails are more easily accomplished in the field without compromising the
level of safety;
overhead construction requirements are smaller than those for ground anchor walls because
soil nail walls do not require the installation of soldier beams; this is particularly important
when construction occurs under a bridge;
soil nailing is advantageous at sites with remote access because smaller equipment is
generally needed; and
the number of contractors with qualifications and experience in soil nail wall construction is
increasing each year.
Performance
soil nail walls are relatively flexible and can accommodate relatively large total and
differential settlements;
measured total deflections of soil nail walls are usually within tolerable limits; and
soil nail walls have performed well during seismic events owing to overall system flexibility.
Cost
soil nail walls are more economical than conventional concrete gravity walls when
conventional soil nailing construction procedures are used;
soil nail walls are typically equivalent in cost or more cost-effective than ground anchor
walls when conventional soil nailing construction procedures are used; and
shotcrete facing is typically less costly than the structural facing required for other wall
systems.
Some of the potential disadvantages of soil nail walls are listed below:
soil nail walls may not be appropriate for applications where very strict deformation control
is required for structures and utilities located behind the proposed wall, as the system requires
some soil deformation to mobilize resistance; post tensioning of soil nails can overcome this
shortcoming in most cases, but this step increases the project cost
the occurrence of utilities may place restrictions on the location, inclination, and length of
soil nails in the upper rows;
soil nail walls are not well-suited where large amounts of groundwater seeps into the
excavation because of the requirement to maintain a temporary unsupported excavation face;
methods
Gabion consists rectangular steel wire mesh basket, which when filled with small
rocks, forms a section that can be placed into a man-made wall. Dozens of gabions can
be locked together and stacked upon each other. Their function provides a barrier to
retard and slow erosion processes caused by water or excessive seepage on steep or
mild slopes. Gabions have several beneficial advantages to the environment, while
they also produce some obvious drawbacks
2. Endurance
Gabion walls resist breakage and separation, due to the flexibility of their wire mesh
construction. They can endure repeated wave pounding and stream flow without
disintegration. The gravel and rocks used in gabion construction are natural to the
environment and can endure years of wear through water erosion. The galvanized wire
used in the mesh resists corrosion and rust.
3. Application
Gabion walls can be used in the formation of pond and damn walls, as well as
cladding for building structures. Cement caps can be placed on top of gabion walls,
similar to the way sidewalks cap the top of wall structures. Gabions can be used to
fashion interconnected beds for slope stabilization, riverbanks and drainage channels.
They provide protection against hill and mud slides, where the topsoil is loose and has
no root foundation.
4. Drainage
Due to the pebble and gravel construction of gabion walls, the permeability remains
good, allowing sufficient natural drainage of runoff, while decreasing the water
velocity by breaking it up and dispersing the pressure over a wide are
1. Aesthetics
Gabion structures have suffered a reputation for being unsightly and unnatural in river,
pond and beach settings. The front-facing walls appear bland and mechanical in
design, rather than form natural-looking rock barriers. Large gabion walls constructed
on tourist beaches serve as a distraction, where very thick and long walls must be used
to protect large beach areas.
2. Maintenance
If the rocks shift or become worn down inside the metal baskets as a result of heavy
water and wave activity, the entire wall must be disassembled to reached the damaged
area. For very tall gabion stacks, any damage to the lower areas requires the removal
of the upper wall elevations, which can be costly and time-consuming.
4. Endurance
In instances of high velocity streams and wave interaction, gabion wall wire mesh
baskets can abrade and tear open, spilling the rock fill.
5. Inspection
Gabion walls must be inspected on a regular basis to insure their integrity. They must
also be immediately inspected and evaluated after any storm, which has caused
heavier than normal water flow.
1. GRAVITY RETAINING WALL
Gravity walls are earliest known retaining structures. They are built from solid concrete or
rock rubble mortared together. The lateral forces from backfill is resisted by the weight of
wall itself, and due to their massive, they develop little or no tension. Therefore, they are
usually not reinforced with steel. Gravity walls are economical for heights up to 3m (10feet)
Methods
Install base material, level, and compact level blocks, adjust where needed
Install AB fieldstone facing units, level and adjust install AB fieldstone anchoring units
Install and compact wall rock and backfill soils sweep to remove excess materials for
proper placement of the next course
Compact wall rock and backfill soils install filter fabric and string line to
starting on the blocks place AB Caps
Step 1: Site Preparation and Excavation
Per the approved plans, place a minimum of 6 in. (150 mm) of wall rock in the base
trench and rake smooth.*
Compact and level base material.
Site Soils Engineer should verify that a proper base is established.
Disadvantages
1. Limited height.
2. Space needed behind wall for construction and backfilling.
3. Not suitable for soft soils due bearing failure.
4. The gravity wall is prone to sliding failure often requires key and propping.