Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Even if you do have a "Birth Certificate" it is impossible to prove that you are a citizen.
It's not even in the realm of possibility.
This is not a religious thing where people believe something without evidence, by
overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
No such thing as "STATES". "QUOTING" from Black's Law dictionary, is not evidence.
That's like saying the evidence that the 'constitution' and "CODE" apply to men and
women, is section 1 of the internal revenue CODE. It is a fallacy that the CODE applied
because the CODE said so.
So lets get to this nonsense that somebody with a "Birth Certificate can be proven to be a
"citizen".
It is absolute falsehood.
Citizen: member of the body politic owing a duty of allegiance, in return for a duty of
protection...these are reciprocal obligations, one a consideration for the other.
Luria v. 231 US 9,22.
Duty of protection
+
Duty of allegiance
=
Citizenship
So let us prove how we go about proving that there is not a "citizen" whether you have a
birth certificate or not.
To have a "citizen" like pointed out above, in court has been laid out many many times,
you have to be a member of the body politic only a duty of "allegiance", in return for
"Duty" of "Protection"?
From what?
From whom?
Yourself?
And it is that duty of protection where it all COLLAPSES!
I, will demonstrate two ways that nobody is a citizen.
Whether they have a "Birth Certificate" or not.
If you look at cases like this, and there are literally thousands of them, Canada, Australia,
and England.
I'm sure every jurisdiction has it.
If you look at BOWERS v. DeVITO, 686 F,2nd, 618 (7thCir. 1982) Cir. 1961).
But there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by
criminals or madmen.
It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does
not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or, we suppose, any
other provision of the Constitution.
The Constitution is a negative charter of negative liberties; it tells the state to let people
alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so
elementary a service as maintaining law and order.
Discrimination in providing protection.
That's all they are. Or, like Lysander wrote, just a gang of killers, thieves and liars.
So lets look at just the facts. Not what the 'courts' have said.
I think they are telling the truth, there is no duty to protect.
Remember. If I did things like the government types and I forced you to give me money,
would you consider me a criminal?
So stop buying the myth, the lie, that you are a citizen.
You are not.
All people are sovereign, and have all of their rights.