Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTACT INFORMATION
Professor(s) TA(s)
Name: Howard P. Forman Name: Emily Trask-Young
Office Location: Evans 2200 E-mail Address: emily.trask-young@yale.edu
Telephone Number: 203-376-9793
E-mail Address: howard.forman@yale.edu Name: Avi Tutman
Office Hours: by appointment E-mail Address: albert.tutman@yale.edu
Review Sessions:
Final Project Review Session: TBD
Exam Review Session: April 17 (in class)
SOFTWARE USED
None
Course Description: Survey course that looks at demand-side and supply-side factors that influence the
delivery of healthcare and health in the US. The course, inherently, challenges the student to consider
the appropriate role of government in the US healthcare delivery system.
Course Outline: see below
Course Objectives:
To provide students with a functional understanding of the financing of healthcare delivery in
America
To understand the basic economic principles, and their effects, with regard to healthcare delivery
To identify the opportunities for private and public sector involvement in improving healthcare
To enable understanding and discussion of health and healthcare reform and its effects on the various
industries in the healthcare sector
To develop skills in industry and company analysis, as a primer for financial valuation of example
companies
Prerequisites: There are no prerequisites for SOM or YSPH-HCM students. Other students must receive
direct permission from the course director.
Course Requirements
Short Paper Monday, February 27, 2017 15%
Final Exam Wednesday, April 19, 2017 25%
Final Project (group) Due at the time of final presentation 45%
Attendance and Participation Ongoing 15%
Grades
Once grades are officially recorded, they may not be changed except in cases in which a mathematical
error has been made in computing the grade or a clerical error has been made in recording it. Students
seeking correction to a grading error must contact the instructor within two weeks (ten working days)
from the receipt of the grade.
DESCRIPTIONS OF REQUIREMENTS/ASSIGNMENTS/PROJECTS
Participation: The course is taught in a small lecture format and thus interchange and discussion are
expected. Each student should bring their name-card to every class to facilitate discussion. Each lecture will
have both assigned and optional reading, primarily from recent literature in the field. Please look to the
Canvas website for the most up-to-date information on reading assignments.
Project Team: Each student will be assigned to a team of 6 members according to the criteria below.
Assignments will be made to maximize the diversity of the teams experience and satisfy submitted industry
preferences as best possible.
Team requirements:
Minimums: 2 SOM students; 3 YSPH students; 1 student with clinical healthcare experience; one
student with finance background/talent.
Maximums: 2 physician and/or medical students; 1 undergraduate student; 3 SOM students;
6 students total
Once assigned (teams will be formed during the third week of class), teams will choose a company in their
assigned industry for their final project. Professor Forman needs to approve the company before the group
proceeds.
Individual Competitive Strategy Paper: Each team member will evaluate the assigned industry from the
perspective of one of Michael Porters five forces. For those unfamiliar with the Porter Forces, the reference
text is available at most bookstores and on-line retailers. The reference textbook is not required but reading
it will facilitate work on this portion of the project. There are also many websites with fairly good coverage of
Page 2
this theme. For groups with six members, Government & Regulation can be considered the sixth force in the
industry.
The paper should be roughly 1000 words. The paper need not be heavily referenced, but references should
be made when appropriate. Prior to handing in the paper, the group must meet and make certain that there
is no inappropriate duplication of material. While each paper is an individual assignment, the cohesiveness of
the sum must be apparent and will become more relevant during completion of the final project. Each paper,
however, will be graded on an individual basis. This paper will be due on Monday, February 27nd.
Final Project: Each group will submit a final presentation on their chosen company within their assigned
industry. The company must be approved by Professor Forman. The project will consist of:
The written portion of the final project will be due at the time of the groups presentation. Groups will also
be asked to submit records of group meetings with attendance over the course of the project. At the time
of the final presentation, groups will submit a statement of contribution and evaluation, which will detail
each students contributions to the whole and attest to each individuals ownership of the full product.
Final Presentation: The final project will be presented during the last two sessions of the class, with all
members of the team participating. The talk should be treated as a professional business presentation, and
professional attire is appropriate. Groups will have 20 minutes to present, with 5 minutes for discussion and
questions. Timing is important, and the cohesiveness of the presentation is considered highly in grading.
Note: Professor Forman reserves the right to extend class on May 1nd, May 3th, and May 8th for an extra
30 minutes as needed. Please hold those times on your calendar.
Final Exam: This will be a test of the course material with free-text answers. Only material discussed in the
lectures will be on the exam and it will cover material through the class on Wednesday, April 12th. There will
be a review session on Monday, April 17th, and the final exam will be held on Wednesday, April 19 , 2017.
th
Page 3
YALE SOM HONOR CODE
Guiding Principles
Honesty is fundamental to the profession and practice of management. It is therefore the bedrock
premise of management education at Yale. To the community of students, faculty, and staff of the Yale
School of Management, honesty and integrity build the trust essential to a free and lively exchange of
ideas.
The Yale SOM Honor Code is intended to foster the Schools exceptional learning environment and to
support conduct that will distinguish the faculty, staff, and students in their lives as managers, at
school, at school-related functions, and in the larger management community. The Honor Code will
be referred to as the Code hereafter.
The Honor Committee has jurisdiction over all Code violations including matters of academic
dishonesty and egregious violations of the social and professional norms of behavior.
Academic Integrity
The Yale SOM community, including faculty, staff, and students, supports the highest standards of
academic integrity. All academic work affords an unparalleled opportunity to put forward new and
innovative ideas; at SOM, we aspire to always acknowledge the ideas upon which new solutions are
based.
When working on any assignment with a team, students must clarify the expectations for each
member of the team.
Faculty will provide clear guidelines for students on the parameters of any group work, as well as
guidelines for proper citation.
A student will contact the professor for clarification if there is a question about the way in which the
group work is to be completed.
Students are encouraged to consult print resources as well as online resources, available on the SOM
portal, concerning proper citation.
Community Standards
A hallmark of the Yale SOM community is its inclusive nature, which respects the diverse backgrounds
and views of its members. SOM faculty, students, and alumni aspire to standards of conduct while at
Yale, and as they function in the larger management community, that will further distinguish SOM as a
center of integrity and fair dealing.
Students must uphold, among themselves, the highest standards of professional behavior.
Students must strictly adhere to ethical guidelines during the job searchwith interviewers,
prospective employers, and their student colleagues.
Students must remember that they represent the School as they take part in activities in the
University, New Haven, and the larger management community.
Standards of individual responsibility in the job search, and in the use of School and University
information technology resources, are detailed under Policies and Guidelines of the Career
Development Office and Policies on the Use of Information Technology Facilities in this chapter.
Page 4
problem sets and all other forms of assessment; falsification and/or fabrication of data; plagiarism, that is,
the failure in a dissertation, essay or other written exercise to acknowledge ideas, research, or language
taken from others; and multiple submission of the same work without obtaining explicit written permission
from both instructors before the material is submitted. Students found guilty of violations of academic
integrity are subject to one or more of the following penalties: written reprimand, probation, suspension
(noted on a students transcript) or dismissal (noted on a students transcript).
GENERAL STATEMENTS
Attendance
Requiredparticipation cannot occur in ones absence!
Laptop/Device Policy
Laptop usage is permitted in lieu of printing the notes. However, it is STRONGLY preferred that you limit non-
class related usage. Participation and respect for the lecturer will be expected.
Page 5
Session Topics Readings Assignments Due
MHS, Yale School of Medicine
The instructor reserves the right to modify and/or change the course syllabus as needed during the course.
Page 6
Session 1: January 23, 2017
*NONE*
Page 7
William M. Sage. Getting The Product Right: How Competition Policy Can Improve Health Care
Markets. Health Aff June 2014 33:1076-1082.
Optional:
Folland, Goodman and Stano: Chapters 5 & 18
Akerlof GA. The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly
Journal of Economics. 82 (1970): 488 500.
Tim Xu, Albert Wu, and Martin Malary. The Potential Hazards of Hospital Consolidation Implications for
Quality, Access, and Price. Octoer 6, 2015. JAMA 314(13): 1337-1338.
Session 6: February 8, 2017
Healthcare Microeconomics (cont.)
Required:
Martin Gaynor. Competition Policy In Health Care Markets: Navigating The Enforcement And Policy
Maze. Health Aff June 2014 33:1088-1093
Drew Altman. "Health-Care Deductibles Climbing Out of Reach". The Wall Street Journal. 2015 Mar
11.
Optional:
Folland, Goodman and Stano: Chapters 8 & 9
Volpp K, Das A. Comparative Effectiveness: Thinking beyond Medication A versus Medication B. N
Engl J Med. 2009; 361(4):3313.
Page 8
FDA Regulation:
Required:
Sharfstein, JM. The FDA - A Misunderstood Agency. JAMA. 2011; 306(11): 1250-51.
Edney, Anna. Shkrelis Strategy to Jack Up Drug Prices May Be Curbed by FDA. Bloomberg. March
14, 2016. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/shkreli-s-strategy-to-jack-up-drug-
prices-may-be-curbed-by-fda
Caponnetto, Pasquale, Daniela Saitta, David Sweanor, and Riccardo Polosa. What to consider when
regulating electronic cigarettes: Pros, cons, and unintended consequences. International Journal of
Drug Policy. June 2015; 26(6): 554-559.
Optional:
Grabowski HG, Kyle M. Evolving Brand-Name And Generic Drug Competition May Warrant A Revision
Of The Hatch-Waxman Act, Health Affairs. 2011 2157-2166.
Nathalie Tadena. "Doctors Proposed Ban of Drug Ads Goes After Top Magazine Ad Category". The
Wall Street Journal. 2015 Nov 18.
Optional
Kevin Outterson. Clinical Trial Transparency Antidote to Weaker Off-Label-Promotion Rules? N Engl
J Med 2014; 371:1-3July 3, 2014.
Optional:
Glen Schumock. National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2015. Am J
Health-Syst PharmVol 71, 2014.
Bach PB. New Math on Drug Cost-Effectiveness. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1797-1799
Health Policy Brief. Biosimilars. Health Affairs. Oct 10, 2013
Nicole Fisher. "The Sunshine Act is Finally Final." Forbes.com. 2/11/2013.
Page 9
Health Disparities:
Required:
Harris, Drew. When Adequate Food Is What the Doctor Prescribes. WSJ. Oct 21, 2016.
http://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2016/10/21/when-adequate-food-is-what-the-doctor-prescribes/
Optional:
Neugebauer, Richard. Randomized Clinical Trials to Evaluate Mental Health Interventions in
Resource-Poor Societies. JAMA: 316 (24). Dec 27, 2016.
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2594699?resultClick=1
Page 10
Ian Morrison. "Health Care Costs and the Choices in the Last Years of Life". Hospitals & Health
Networks. 2015 Mar 03.
Elizabeth Weeks Leonard. "CMS Proposed Changes To The Two-Midnight Rule: Partial Restoration Of
Medical Judgment". Health Affairs Blog. 2015 Sep 01.
Optional
Folland, Goodman and Stano: Chapters 21
Baicker K, Chernew ME. The economics of financing Medicare. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4): e7.
Christopher Hogan, Direct Research LLC. "Spending in the Last Year of Life and the Impact of Hospice
on Medicare Outlays". MedPac. 2015 Jun.
Session 14: March 27, 2017
Medicare Part B and D:
Required:
Julie M. Donohue. The Impact and Evolution of Medicare Part D. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:693-
695August 21, 2014
Hackman, Michelle. U.S. Spending More on Specialty Drugs Under Medicare. WSJ. Jan 5, 2017.
Optional:
Okma KG, Marmor TR, Oberlander J. Managed competition for Medicare? Sobering lessons from The
Netherlands. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4):287-9.
Wilensky GR. Improving value in Medicare with an SGR fix. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):1-3.
Page 11
Aaron HJ. How not to reform Medicare. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1588-9.
Holahan J, Yemane A. Enrollment is driving Medicaid costs--but two targets can yield savings. Health
Affairs. 2009 SepOct;28(5):1453-65.
Health Policy Brief. Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Health Affairs. Nov 12, 2013.
Page 12
Berenson RA, Kaye DR. Grading a physician's value--the misapplication of performance measurement.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2079-81
Check out Medicare payments to specific providers through this interactive tool:
http://graphics.wsj.com/medicare-billing/
Tricia Brooks. Open Enrollment Take Two. Health Aff June 2014 33:927-930;
What Can Massachusetts Teach Us About National Health Insurance Reform? Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management, 30(1): 177-195 (2011). Jon Gruber and Doug Holtz-Eakin.
S.T. Edwards and B.E. Landon. Medicare's Chronic Care Management Payment Payment Reform for
Primary Care. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:2049-2051.
Page 13