Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1995
Copyright 1995 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0009 2509/95 $9.50 + 0.00
0009-2509(94)00241-X
Abstract--A five-fibreoptical particle velocity measuring system was used to determine vertical velocities
and the fractions of rising and falling particles in a circulating fluidized bed riser of 146 mm x 146 mm
square cross-section.The superficialgas velocity and solids circulation rate are shown to affect lateral and
axial profiles of particle velocity and the fraction of particles moving upwards. The thickness of the outer
annulus downflow region first decreased with height until a minimum was reached and then became thicker
towards the top of the riser. Because of the exit effect, lateral profilesof particle velocitywere asymmetricat
the top of the riser and the wall downflowlayer was thicker on the side opposite to the exit than on the exit
side. The corners were also found to be regions of greater downflow.
geometry of the riser has considerable influence on the in the standpipe enter the riser through an L-valve,
hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized beds. Al- which is also used to control the solids circulation
though risers of square cross-section are widely used rate. A more detailed description of the experimental
in industry, especially for CFB combustion, very little apparatus is given elsewhere (Zhou et al., 1994).
research has been carried out in risers of non-circular Ottawa sand of mean diameter 213/~m, particle
cross-section. In this papers, results of our experi- density 2640 kg/m 3 and loosely packed bed voidage
mental study on both lateral and axial particle veto- 0.43 was used as the bed material. This sand has
city profiles are presented. This extends earlier work a minimum ftuidization velocity of 0.048 m/s and
(Zhou et al., 1994) in which we have determined void- a terminal velocity of 1.41 m/s.
age profiles in the same riser. The time-of-descent technique (Burkell et al., 1988)
was employed to measure the solids circulation rate,
EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP defined here in terms of the amount of solids returned
A schematic of the cold model circulating fluidized to the riser. This method involves measuring the time
bed riser in which experiments were carried out is for identifiable particles to descend through a known
shown in Fig. 1. (The coordinates shown here are distance in a transparent section of a smooth-walled
employed in all other figures.) It is made of steel standpipe through which the solids return in moving
sections of inside cross-section 146 mm x 146 mm. packed bed flow.
The system consists of a riser, two cyclones, a stand-
pipe for storing recirculating solids and an L-valve to INSTRUMENTATION
return solids to the base of the riser. The total height Particle velocity profiles were determined by means
of the riser is 9.14 m. Plexiglass windows are mounted of an optical fibre probe as shown in Fig. 2. Each of
on two facing surfaces for visual observation. These the five fibres is a silicon optical fibre of diameter
were specially designed to ensure a smooth inside 200 pm. The similarity between the fibre size and the
surface. Pressure taps and measurement ports were particle diameter allows measurements from single
provided on the two facing steel walls of each section. particles and optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio. The
Air can be supplied at the bottom of the riser through probe consists of a horizontal cylindrical portion of
a multi-orifice distributor. The superficial gas velocity diameter 2 mm and length 0.3 m leading to a l0 mm
is measured by an orifice meter. long head of cross-section 0.5 mm wide by 1.8 mm
A primary cyclone is installed to separate entrained high. Light is delivered via fibres B and D, and then
solids from gas. Most fine particles not captured by reflected through fibres A, C and E to three separate
the primary cyclone are removed by a secondary photo-multipliers by particles which pass the end of
cyclone and returned to the standpipe. Solid particles the probe. Signals from the photo-mulitipliers are
carried to peak detectors. Separate measurements of
particle velocity are available from the A and C fibre
Z signals and from the C and E signals. A velocity is
only accepted if these two measured velocities are
within a certain tolerance, taken here to be 1% of each
Y Exit Vent other, i.e.
Secondary
JSeparator VAc
Vp ~ - m + VcE f o r 2 VAc -- VcE ~ 0.01 (1)
2 VAc + Vc~
Primary where
Separator
VAC = ),ac/tac and VCE = 2cE/tcE, (2)
I
6.08 m
Secondary
9.14m Air to photomultiplier
../Storage
Bed
[A om light source
rl:l to photomultiplier
tL,,J
j L-Valve r~
~ f r o m light source
2.7411
r~
L-valve t~
~ to photomultiplier
~JJAeration
Primary
E
Primav , Air Distributor
Fig. 2. Schematic of the five-fibre optical particle velocity
Fig. 1. Schematic of the circulating fluidized bed system. probe.
Particle velocity profiles in a circulating fluidized bed riser 239
with 2Ac and 2cE being the effective separation dis- 8 . , . i , .
100 . , . . . . . , . . , . , . , . , .
80
Q)
80 ~ 2 70
g
.
60 ~
V Descending Pamcles r-
Fig. 7. Lateral profiles of fractions of particles travelling Fig. 8. Vertical profiles of particle velocities and fraction of
upwards for different superficial gas velocities: particles descending along wall of column: Ug = 5.5 m/s,
Gs = 40 kg/m 2s, z = 6.2 m, x / X = O. Gs = 20 kg/m2 s, x / X = O, y / Y = - 1.
Particle velocity profiles in a circulating fluidized bed riser 241
6 20
100
5 E
E 16 o~
~4 80 d
>=3 60~_ ~ \ /
Descending Particles .9 i
~o 2 zx Ascending Paticles
r-
F-
o 40~= ~ 8
m
>
1
"6 0 ........ 2o~'~ -J
= 4.
Q. 0
-2 L i i i 0 i
4I
i
Fig. 9. Vertical profiles of particle velocities and fraction of Fig. 10. Axial profile of annular wall layer thickness:
particles ascending along axis of column: Ug = 5.5 m/s, Ua = 5.5 m/s, G~= 40 kg/m 2s, x / X = O.
G, = 20 kg/m2 s, x / X = O, y / Y = O.
2 , . , . . . . . 1100
height at the bottom of the riser, then decreased, and 80
finally increased again at the top of the riser. These
trends are consistent with the profiles of particle con-
centration reported by Zhou et al. (1994). ~o . . . . . . . . . . / "~
The velocities of particles descending at the wall are
seen to be in the range of - 0.8 to - 1.5 m/s. This mag- v DescendingParticles
nitude is similar to the magnitude of downward wall -1 i Ascending Particles ~20 ~ a
velocities summarized by Wu et al. (1991) and by
Senior and Brereton (1992) for previous work by
other authors with columns of circular cross-section -2o'.o' o.2' o.4' o.6 0'.8' 1.8
and is influenced very little by the operating condi- Lateral Position, y/Y
tions such as solids circulation rate and superficial gas
Fig. 1 l. Lateral profiles of particle velocities and fraction of
velocity. However, at a small distance, e.g. 3 mm, from particles descending near the wall of column: Ug = 5.5 m/s,
the wall of the riser, it was found that the magnitude G~= 40 kg/m2 s, z = 5.13 m, x / X = 1.
of the descending particle velocity could be signifi-
cantly greater, as high as 2.5 m/s.
Figure 9 indicates that along the axis of the riser, Figure 11 shows that the mean ascending particle
the fraction of particles travelling upwards hardly velocity near the corner was somewhat lower, while
changed with height. This is consistent with particle the magnitude of the descending particle velocity in
concentration measurements in the same column the corner was higher than mid-way between opposite
(Zhou et al., 1994) which indicated that the particle walls. The same trend was obtained at a height of
concentration is relatively uniform in the core of the 6.20 m. The magnitudes of the velocities of the de-
riser. scending particles in the corners at z = 5.13 and
The particle velocity data, coupled with the data for 6.20 m were around 1.8 m/s. Wang et al. (1993) found
the fractions of particles ascending and descending, that instantaneous particle velocities in the corners of
allows the relative upward and downward fluxes and a riser did not exhibit any systematic trend, while our
the thickness of the downflowing annulus layer to be results in this work are time-average values. As noted
determined. The axial profile of the annulus thickness by Zhou et al. (1994) and consistent with the relative
for Ug = 5.5 m/s and Gs = 40kg/m2s is shown in numbers of ascending and descending particles, the
Fig. 10. The core/annulus boundary has again been particle concentration in the corner was higher than
taken as the location where the time-mean particle elsewhere along the wall. This is because descending
velocity is zero. This thickness first decreased with particles were well protected by the corner where the
height from the bottom until a minimum was reached gas velocity is lower.
about 4 m above the distributor, then it increased To check the accuracy of our experimental data, net
towards the top. Near the bottom, the net lateral solids fluxes were estimated by integration using data
solids flux must have been outwards towards the wall from voidage profiles from previous work (Zhou et al.,
of the riser, causing the annulus thickness to decrease 1994) together with particle velocity profiles and frac-
with height. However, in the upper portion of the tions of particles rising and falling from this work, all
riser, many particles reaching the top are reflected for Ug = 5.5 m/s. The integrated values of net solids
downwards along the wall. Net solids fluxes were then fluxes are 37.2 and 38.0 kg/m 2 s for heights of 5.13 and
inwards towards the axis of the column as wall layers 6.2 m with Gs = 40 kg/m 2 s, and 19.1 kg/m 2 s for
are stripped of particles as they descend. z = 6.2 m with Gs = 20kg/mZs. These calculated
242 J. ZHOU et al.
fluxes are sufficiently close to the preset values of G, settling velocity. The wall layer thickness is assumed
that they add to the confidence in the data. to be uniform at any height. The gas velocity is as-
Lateral profiles of mean vertical particle velocity sumed to increase linearly from the wall and to be
appear in Fig. 12. Particles near the wall are seen to a constant in the core. The predicted average particle
travel mostly downwards, while most particles are velocity in the core of the developed region for
conveyed upwards in the core. In the corner, particles Uo = 5 . 5 m / s and G ~ = 4 0 k g / m 2 s is around 4 to
moved downwards faster and the thickness of the 4.2 m/s for conditions corresponding to the riser em-
downflow wall layer was greater than mid-way be- ployed in the present study, except near the top. The
tween facing walls. The values of y / Y where v~, = 0 corresponding experimental average particle velocity
have been used to obtain profiles of wall layer thick- in the core was in the range of 3.5-4.2 m/s, in good
ness. These are shown in Fig. 13 for U o = 5.5 m/s and agreement with the predictions. On the other hand,
G~ = 40 kg/m 2 s. The shape of the outer wall layer is the thickness of the annular wall layer for the de-
indicated in the inset. Note the increased thickness of veloped region calculated from the model was much
the wall layer in the corners. smaller than the experimental value.
The magnitudes of the average particle velocity in Lateral profiles of particle velocities and fraction of
the core for the developed region have been compared sampled particles ascending near the top of the riser
with results of a semi-empirical hydrodynamic CFB are presented in Fig. 14. Because of the presence of the
model developed by Senior and Brereton (1992). The exit, these profiles are not symmetrical around
model assumes a constant voidage and a constant y / Y = 0. Instead, the location of the maximum as-
downward particle velocity in an outer annular layer, cending particle velocity is shifted somewhat to the
and uniform dilute suspension in the core where par- exit side. Also, the thickness of the a n n u l a r wall layer
ticles travel upwards at a constant velocity equal to was thinner on the exit side than on the opposite side.
the core gas superficial velocity minus the terminal In the annular zone, the magnitude of the average
velocity of descending particles was smaller for the
exit side than for the opposite side. These results are
consistent with the gas flow pattern for an abrupt exit
8 region proposed by Brereton (1987).
--;-~=o . . . . . . .
g6 - - - - x/X=0 375
A_ x/X=0.780~
~ ' 8I ' .ix;...... ix. , ..~_=__,_,ix,___,,~. , . 100
_
o 2
,,: _aJ
0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,~ 2 ~ .~ / . DesccndingParticles~A ~: ~ .-
~-2
ft.
e-
0 4-:' iX & AscendingParticles "~40
................... /,,
~m
60 I~C o r e ~ Core-annulus
Annulus
E , boundary