NAME: DIYAH TRI SASMITA

CLASS: XII SOCIAL 4

DEATH PENALTY FOR CORRUPTORS

OUTLINE
A. ISSUE :
1) DEFINITION OF DEATH PENALTY
2) BACKGROUND
B. ARGUMENT:
a) PRO:
1) PSHYCOLOGY SIDE
2) ECONOMIC SIDE
3) CULTURE SIDE
b) CONTRA:
1) HUMAN RIGHT
2) ECONOMIC SIDE
3) SOCIAL SIDE
C. CONCLUSION :
1) PRO
2) CONTRA
A. ISSUE

Before I have start this discussion, let me describe about death penalty. A death penalty is
the sentence of execution for murder and some other capital crimes (serious crimes,
especially murder, which are punishable by death). The death penalty, or capital
punishment, may be prescribed by Congress or any state legislature for murder and other
capital crimes. The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty is not a per se
violation of the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Furthermore,
the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury trial in capital crime cases.

Though the death penalty existed as a punishment from the inception of the Republic of
Indonesia, the first judicial execution did not take place until 1973.

The Indonesian government does not issue detailed statistics about every person facing
the death penalty in the country. In fact, "the search for precise gures is hampered by
prevailing state secrecy over the death penalty." It is believed, however, that there are
around 130 people, Indonesians and foreign nationals, currently (as of 2013) sentenced to
die in Indonesia. About ten new death sentences are handed down annually, though
executions are infrequent. Many of the prisoners awaiting execution have been waiting
for ten years or more. Four executions took place in 2013, the first since 2008. In 2014,
no executions took place.normally, death penalty is used for murder and drugs kingpin.
recently, there discourses from the people to give the corruptors death penalty. its
because the people are already tired of irregularities that have been a culture of
indonesian goverment. during this day, the punishment that given for corruptors isn't
make them scared enough. every year, there's some case that uncovered by KPK. they're
steal a lot of people's money. the court just gave them a little imprisonment.

B. ARGUMENT
a) PRO (AFFIRMATIVE)
i'am in the pro side that support death penalty for corruptors . there a some
reason why i should agree for this policy.
firstly, from the phsicology side. we're all know that death penalty's mean the
suspect will die soon. or, certainly they have a short time to be a good person
dan gather with their family. everyone in this world certainly want a long life.
but, how if they have a short life just because their fault?
the person that want to do corrupt will think twice. how about their family if
he/her died. it's mean, the corrupt goverment population will go down. there
are more people's money will be saved from the white coat criminals. it's can
make our economic being better. the fund will use as it should be. the people's
prosperous will up to the highest. there's nothing fund going to the corruptors
pocket. and, last. if the goverment applied the death penalty for the corruptors
the people's belive the goverment can make them feel safe. as their duty
generally. this bad culture will vanished if the goverment assertively apply this
policy without indiscriminately
 b) CONTRA
all human have something called human rights. including the corruptors. they
are still humen. they're have family. we can't kill anyone. just god can do it.
everyone must have a chance to be better. every sinner have a past. but, they're
still have future. why don't we give them that chance? death penalty is not a
best way to reduce corruptos population. there are so many way to do it. a
saying said that a bilion way go to roma. we can commandeer their treasures
till them being poor. so they can feel how difficult to being a poor. then, death
penalty is not just killing someone and bury the bodies any where. it take a lot
money. one death excecution can take 100.000.000 rupiahs for once killing.
you know, how many corruptor suspect in indonesia? . i thought it can
detrimental to the country. the money can being used to the people's in need
rather than killing a person.

C. CONCLUSION
a) PRO:
if we dare to do a thing, we must agree with the risk. for the corruptors, death
penalty might be a bigest scare. and they will defend themselves with much
argument. the one is human right. but, we must know that human right can be
aplied with the people which is do their duty. they're human. that's right. but,
inside they're evil.
they harm millions people's that their RIGHT has stolen by not responsible
man.
i thought, it's okay if we're take too much money to eradicate corrupt. it's a
good investation. isn't it?

b) CONTRA
everyone that was born is a human. no matter who they are. we can't take out
the rights. we can judge badly. but, we dont know what actually happening. as
a human, our duty is reminding if a person do a fault . there are so many way
to do something. we must pick the better one that honoring the humanity