Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The use of superplastically formed Al alloy components could save cost and reduce weight in aerospace structures. However, problems
related with non-uniform thickness and cavitation occur during superplastic deformation. In the case of hemisphere forming part, the
thickness becomes much thinner and the cavitation increased exponentially as closed to the pole. In order to unify the thickness and to
decrease the cavity, the thickness distribution of sheet was controlled by using the rotary forging. The sheet is preformed into the cone type
and become the thickest in the center. The hemisphere formed part using the preformed sheet has uniform thickness and also lower cavity
than that of original sheet. It is found that cavity is increased rapidly when the strain reaches the critical value. Also discussed are that the
critical strain is closely related to shapes and positions in the vicinity of particles and at triple point of grain boundary. # 2001 Elsevier
Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Superplastic blow forming; Rotary forming; Thickness distribution; Cavity; AlCuZr alloy
0924-0136/01/$ see front matter # 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 4 - 0 1 3 6 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 5 6 4 - 7
Y.-S. Lee et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 112 (2001) 114120 115
Table 1 Table 2
Chemical compositions of Supral 100 Mechanical properties of Supral 100
Supral 100 6.02 0.34 0.17 0.16 0.09 0.03 Balance UTS (MPa) 316 450.9
Elongation (%) 6.25 21.6
gas pressure was programmed to operate to yield the strain thickness for hemisphere forming under a strain rate of
rate of 10 310 4 s 1 when sheet temperature reaches to 10 310 4 s 1 [10,11]. Thickness distribution and the
4508C. Previous results showed that maximum pressure of degree of cavity formation in the superplastically formed
0.2 MPa was required to form the sheets with 2 mm in parts were analyzed quantitatively in minimum ve
Fig. 2. Diagram of rotary forming and the thickness change of sheet after rotary forming.
116 Y.-S. Lee et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 112 (2001) 114120
specimens. Optical microscopy as well as scanning electron 3.2. Thickness distribution and cavitation in
microscopy were used for the microstructural analysis. superplastically formed part using the as-received sheet
Elongation data on various locations of the superplastically and the rotary formed sheet
formed parts were measured using grid marking methods
and the thickness distribution was measured directly using 3.2.1. Thickness distribution
point micrometer after the specimens were cutoff. The The cross-section and thickness distribution of super-
volume fraction of the cavities after the SPF was measured plastically formed hemispherical parts were summarized
from the SEM photographs using an image analyzer. in Fig. 5. From the result of LVDT (linear velocity displace-
Rotary forming as a preforming was done on the as- ment transducer) measurement, it is found that forming
received sheets of 200 mm in diameter and the photographs velocity at the center was 0.02 mm/s. It showed that the
and the dimensions of the rotary formed sheets are shown in thickness at the center was minimum and became increased
Fig. 2. as it goes to the outside. Also the thickness became reduced
further as the forming time increased. The thickness strain
(et) at the center of the formed part (DH 30 mm, dome
3. Results and discussions height) was measured to be approximately 0.4 in 20 min and
1.6 in 40 min.
3.1. Analysis on as-received sheet and the rotary formed Also increased the thickness deviation at various locations
sheet of the formed part as the amount of the deformation.
In this study, rotary forming of the as-received sheets was
Based upon the results from the TEM study, the grain size employed as a preforming process of the SPF in order to
of the Supral 100 did not change much during the SPF improve the uniformity of the thickness variation. The
process, showing approximately 2.5 mm in diameter both thickness at the center and the outside of the sheet formed
before and after the forming as shown in Fig. 3. by rotary forming were determined from the preliminary
Materials showing superplastic characteristics generally results using machined materials at various thickness. The
have grain size of less than 10 mm in diameter. If the results indicated that the cracking near the clamping areas
microstructure and the grain size of sheet are varied during occur if the thickness difference between the center and the
the rotary forming process, it could possibly lose super- outside is over 4 mm. Based upon the preliminary results
plastic characteristics. Therefore the sheets were subject to obtained from machined materials, the thickness difference
the XRD analysis before and after the rotary forming, the of the rotary formed materials at the center and the outside
results indicated that there were little variation in the micro- was set to be approximately 0.10.2 mm.
structure during the forming process, as shown in Fig. 4. The The thickness distribution of formed part of the as-
XRD peak from (1 1 1) and (2 0 0) of the sheets got inten- received sheet and rotary formed sheet under the identical
sied in a small degree while the intensities of the peaks forming conditions were summarized in Fig. 6. The super-
from (2 2 0) and (3 1 1) decreased. plastic formed part of rotary formed sheet showed much
The FWHM (full width of half maximum intensity) of improved thickness distribution, showing the thickness at
rotary formed sheet was increased due to dislocation density the center of 1.31 and 1.6 mm at the clamping area. On the
grown by the cold working, as shown in Table 3. However, contrary, the formed part which use the as-received sheet
this did not affect the characteristics of superplasticity of the showed the thickness of 0.4 mm at the center and 1.55 mm at
materials. the outside.
Table 3
The change of FWHM by rotary forging
(1 1 1) (2 0 0) (2 2 0) (3 1 1)
Before rotary forging 0.12 0.23 0.42 0.52 Fig. 5. Thickness distribution prole according to the forming amount: (a)
After rotary forging 0.22 0.48 0.47 0.69 appearances of hemispheres at different forming amount; (b) thickness
distribution according to the distance from the center.
118 Y.-S. Lee et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 112 (2001) 114120
Fig. 6. The comparison of thickness distribution of formed part using the as-received sheet and the rotary formed sheet.
Fig. 7. The comparison of cavity volume fraction of formed part using as-received and rotary formed sheet with respect to thickness strain.
Fig. 8. Change of cavity with respect to thickness strain (et) after SPF of the as-received sheet: (a) et 0:5; (b) et 1:9.
Y.-S. Lee et al. / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 112 (2001) 114120 119
4. Conclusions
[6] A.J. Barnes, Forming of metal articles, European Patent No. 0172732 [9] R. Grimes, R.G. Butler, Superplasticity in Aerospace, 1988,
Al. pp. 9711.
[7] B.M. Watt, M.J. Stowell, B.L. Baikie, D.G.E. Owen, Metal Science, [10] J.H. Lee, H.C. Kim, Y.S. Lee, S.Y. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Technol.
June 1976, pp. 189197. Plasticity 7 (6) (1998) 610619.
[8] V.V. Astanin, K.A. Padmanbhan, S.S. Bhattacharya, Materials [11] S.S. Hong, M.H. Kim, Y.H. Kim, J. Korea Inst. Mech. Eng. 19 (6)
Science and Technology, Vol. 12, July 1996, pp. 545550. (1995) 14111421.