You are on page 1of 94

The Death of money and Inflation although inflation

is required, proving massive fraud in the "market".

Written By Edward Ameri

Copyright June 2017

Inflation is required in the market, but it is not possible. the market cannot be
sustained off of inflation, because savings is the rule for all businesses,
ostensibly, and thus kills the price. To operate a business, through input cost
disbursements, savings are required. These are inflationary dollars that kill
the price in a mechanism called Savings Price. Price is multiplied by twice the
amount + infinite. The formula is Savings = P (market price) + infinite.

That is the amount of savings required relative to price, in ADDITION to price


actually, for the whole market to ostensibly operate. This mechanism proves
that savings cannot even sustain businesses, because it requires an infinite
vat of savings that ends up killing price. When a business owner uses savings
from past profits or bank loans to operate a business, that is only a facade.
Those savings are used as injected inflationary dollars to kill the price. You
are in fact adding money that is not achieved through current profits to cover
future expenditures of business (input costs). That is a savings bubble. The
truth is that the money you are making currently is designed to fully cover
your input costs for a future price tag or service, which is a backwards
process. Profit is designed to recoup a past expenditure in total. Past
expenditures, or A priori Expenditures of input cost, require inflationary
dollars extraneous to the transactions that are in the commercial process.
This means that this money has to come from savings outside of business,
savings that are unrepayable inflationary dollars - dollars that are greed
based and have nothing to do with business. The business should be retired,
and there is no other excuse. Transactions are the rule in business. Each
transactions and each price tag are what bring the business money and
profits, for both living expenses and business operations.

Market price is always a differential of input costs and profit gradient. The
total purchase of input costs of labor, materials, equipments, space, and
energy has to be recouped to cover the market price, which in return should
be double the input cost for profits. A business should get minimum 12
dollars for the 6 dollars it disburses input cost. Otherwise they would be
making too low relative to what they spend. Nobody wants a business that is
worth $500,000 vs. a house that is worth $100,000. That would be as if the
secretary relativistically owns a business worth 1 million dollars.
Input costs aggregate vs. profit gradients, to the point where input costs are
always exponentially higher. A priori disbursements are recouped in the
future, meaning money must be virally injected that is NOT made through
inflationary transactions of dollars and cents. This means that the money a
business make currently is bringing in new money for a future cost. That is
the illusion of business. That is the only way a business ever works, and in
the end that future cost turns out to be SAVINGS totaling the whole INPUT
COST of operating a business, for every single transaction a business makes.
What this implies is that every price tag brings in money that is a repayment
for a past bill that was already DISBURSED. Past bills are constantly repaid,
multiplying past bills to infinite, while profit gradients recede to zilch. Profits
are an illusion, and input costs (loss of purchases by business) compound to
the point of oblivion. The price tag is destroyed because a business is never
recouping the full amount of disbursements. The business instead is using
savings for disbursements from past "profits", but that does not work.

The formula for input costs is: Input cost (in currency denominations) X
infinite = total loss and no profit gradient.

All businesses require space, land, rents, equipments, materials, etc. in order
to operate and function as a company. Those are costs that occur FIRST in
time, not a posteriori after sales. That is a time immutability to the economic
system. This means that sales occur AFTER business disbursements that are
coming from inflationary savings (money that a business ALREADY has in a
bank account ALL the time for every transaction). This means the business is
retired, and has money that too much for even working in the market.

The fact is that market prices that are too high cannot obfuscate this fact.
Market prices will always be variable, as long as they are higher than input
costs. But even with a high demand product or service, the same result will
ensue despite some mathematics that might suggest otherwise on a
microscopic level. I will discuss how market price is always a subject of supply
and demand. Prices can change in the inflationary spectrum, but they do not
have to. As money is injected into the economy through the money supply by
the central bank and member banks as well as the treasury department,
prices only change as a result of a supply and demand of goods, although
prices can theoretically change as a result of a higher supply of currency.
Higher supply of currency suggests lower demand for each unit of currency,
meaning that prices can change based on a higher supply of money. That
does not have to happen. Transactionally prices can stay the same, and
profits can aggregate through volume sales. Either way, inflation is required.
Inflation is required because every transaction requires NEW money. Novel
money is required otherwise savings money is used to kill price. We can
prove that novel transactional money is required because without that
money, businesses fall in a domino effect instantaneously. Savings is what
supplants the money required to operate a company, and also is what
provides checks for workers, if NEW money that is inflationary does not
aggregate throughout the economy geographically and in total.

Either way, that money is inflationary, whether it is savings or new money


dispensed by a bank or some corrupted loan sharks. The fact is, that money
is not repayable. It is consumer money that constantly adds up and is
external to any commercial process of producing goods and services to sell.
CONSUMPTION, CONSTANT, INFINITE, NOVEL transactional inflationary dollars
are required to operate a finite business spectrum in a geographical market.

Input costs can seemingly be used from prior sales to fund new price tags
through operation of input cost of business, through a formula that is input
cost must be multiplied by 3 times for every MARKET PRICE total. This allows
for savings to be used in the form of one apportioned market price for every
subsequent price tag and operation of business. This provides for a
mechanism by which one single sliver of the input cost amount, doubled, will
suffice for profit. All input costs are savings amounts for the future operation
of business, that is, all input cost disbursements are originating from previous
sales to be used for the future disbursement.

But in fact, four times the amount of input cost should be the actual market
price. This will allow for twice the amount of input cost to be obtained as
Profit. That basis will provide for a calculation wherein it seems that prior
sales can fund future operations of business, constantly, per EACH and every
single transaction.

However, the very concept is a contradiction. Savings must buttress and in


fact ELIMINATE every price tag. Every single price tag is killed by savings
being imputed to cover the whole input cost of a business, every single time!
The constancy of that process defeats the purpose of business, no matter
HOW high the market price is to imaginarily, facetiously, fallaciously, and
speciously obfuscate that process through some mechanical process. The fact
of the matter is that input costs aggregating in the future in infinite time will
always only ever equal the market price which is infinite as well, in dollars
and cents. That means that recoupments (total market price, not even just
profit gradient) can only ever be the same exact amount as disbursements
(input cost). This means that a business can only ever achieve in return what
they spend, and that means business is maximum futile. It is actually an
implied loss, how about that? That very concept requires Market Price from
the first instance to be the sum total of all input costs in the aggregation of
transactions in the market for one business. MP = Total Input costs (t1 + t2 +
t3...infinitely). This mechanism defeats the purpose of business. It also
reveals a hidden truth in the market wherein transactions can seemingly
occur with inflationary dollars and savings infinitely to operate a business,
but in reality those transactions can never occur, because that money would
be inflationary savings extraneous to the market, and the business would be
operating despite having all the money already. Price is destroyed, meaning
all the businesses in the market must have the same profit. Dollars and cents
do not make a difference, and cannot have differential gradients in terms of
profit margins or price tags. The whole market cannot function using medium
of exchange in aggregate or severably, or 1 by 1's, or 2 by 2's, or 3 by 3's,
etc. That is a contradiction hidden, as an oroborus cyclical process that never
amounts to anything - achieves nothing, in terms of gain and destroys
business.

A posteriori disbursements in this fashion, are not possible, because they


always imply something in the future which cannot occur. They imply a future
transaction when the business is not making any money, it is only a concept.
In reality mathematically it is proven that it also cannot occur. Inflation is
profit, and a price tag over 0 dollars, yet it is only an imagination. Any profit
or price requires inflation. Any exchange of currency causes an accretion of 1
dollar over 0 dollars, meaning inflation. Inflation = Profit = Price. In supply
and demand terms, the monetary system is always 0 currency units. It can
only ever achieve 1 as an imagination, and 1 is in higher demand, yet in
lower supply of units. 1 is in higher demand because it contains one extra
unit than 0. 0 is in low supply relative to the high demand of 1, so 0 demands
the 1, yet the achievement of 1 is only an illusion. Market transactions do not
allow for 1 to be achieved. The extra unit of 1 is in low supply relative to the 0
which does not have that unit. Therefore 1 is in higher demand as a whole
unit, relative to 0. This relativism is an imagination, since inflation though
required for tansactions as discussed, is never achieved and the market ends
up being 0.

The market is based on a cascade of prices. Within all prices there is a


gradient wherein a cascade is formed. Prices go higher and higher up the
ladder, as a result of transactions meaning that a purchase is responded in
kind by a business by raising the price tag relative to that disbursement of
input cost. No matter what, a cascade is formed. In a gradient of prices and
profit margins, the cascade always forms a situation wherein there are half
Seller businesses and half buyer businesses, weaker on the cascade. This is
typical of the domino effect destruction of the market, in an instant. A
cascade of prices is naturally formed, no matter what. The finite set of
businesses is half seller businesses and half weaker buyer businesses. That is
a domino effect destruction of the market, which precludes transactions.

The market is based on switching of positions and reliance. A business cannot


just make money through sales and purchases in volume based transactions
in order to subsist when half of the market dies off and cannot buy from that
businesses subsequently. Commerce in a money market is a reliance based
mechanism, that precludes even volume sales, which require other
businesses to WAIT through geographical and time space, preventing them
from transacting in a penumbra of time of the work wee. In other words,
those other businesses must go bankrupt waiting to transact, and in the end
the same result occurs.

In every cascade of prices through transactions, there is a weaker buyer.


Weaker buyers die off, killing the whole cascade in an instant. The market is
only as good as the weakest link. But transactions always lead to failure.

The fact of the matter is that input costs aggregate relative to buyer
businesses, meaning that any one business never makes more than a
business it is buying from. That truth is axiomatic, because input costs are a
certainty and profit is a gamble. Profit requires WORK, input costs require
guarantees by the business who is disbursing those costs to the other
business. That chance gradient, that probability gradient, forces input costs
to infinitely compound mechanistically, making them ALWAYS higher than
profit margins. It is not possible - At best profit margins can equate to input
cost dibusrements, which defeats the purpose of business.

Profit differentials are thus not possible. Non profit is also not possible
because any currency amount above 0 dollars is technically profit. It actually
is, any amount of accumulation of money, is profit, no matter if there is a
differential higher of input costs to market price, for recoupments of those
input costs and net incomes. Anything above 0 implies and imputes profit
mechanism.

Businesses in the finite spectrum switch off positions. The initial position is of
a business buyer higher and a seller lower, going down the cascade. This
implies that the weakest business is a seller. Going down the cascade that is
what the market achieves. When those 1 by 1 transactions occur in the
market through a unitary transaction, The switch off position is Seller higher
and buyer weaker, with a weakest buyer in the market. The weakest buyer
kills the whole market in a domino effect instantaneously.

If we look at the next transaction from there, we can see that the based on
the spectrum of the market, 2 single businesses do a transaction of a higher
buyer business purchasing input cost materials, or ANY materials from
another business as a DESIGNATED BUSINESS OWNER, which causes a
miraculous and destructive system wherein there are half Higher seller
businesses and half weaker buyer businesses.

So the sellers have no one to sell to, because the buyers are weaker in this
natural cascade that is formed in the market, with weaker buyers.

Cascades form as a result of buyer businesses buying from a seller business,


then the price must be raised to recoup that input cost dibursement. The
seller business now cannot afford from the buyer business because the price
was raised, meaning it will lose all the money that it earned in prior
transaction, and it will have to use savings on top of losing it's total market
price profit. That is a total loss!!!!! That is the basis of all cascades.

That process of the cascade dying off with obstruction of the market of half
sellers and half buyers weaker who cannot afford those other sellers is an
instantaneous bankrutpcy of the market. Because seller companies have no
one to sell to based on dollar tag and profit margins withiin that unitary
framework in the geographic span of the market. That is the basis of the
transactional approach, and that is how all businesses make their money,
through transactions accumulating through time.

The system splits into two, wherein buyers are broken apart on one side, and
sellers are broken apart higher priced on the other side of the finite spectrum.
This means That new buyers and sellers must arrive for profit to commence,
and they must arrive at infinite speed, instantaneously in real time. In a
profiteering mechanism this is necessitated, and also as a probability choice
mechanism between two businesses. One business cannot simply sit there
and do transactions with another business all the time, playing hot potato
hop scotch. That would mean that finite business systems simply cannot
work, they die off. New companies are needed quick and in real time, to the
point where 1 or 2 transactions destroy the possibility of commerce with
medium of exchange. Medium of exchange can be fiat currency as it is in
central banking mechanisms of the Bank for International Settlements, IMF,
World Bank, and of course, the Federal Reserve and ECB. It can also be gold,
silver, bitcoin, and any other type of species. None of these work, when given
a numerical value. Those types of exchanges are simply not possible. So new
businesses have to accrue all the time, due to the system breaking down
using numerical price tags that occlude possibilities of business, without NEW
BUSINESSES forming instantaneously, which is humanly and physically
impossible. This prevents commerce for any group of transactions, in 1 by 1,
and 2 by 2 aggregates throughout the market, making monetary commerce
infinitely impossible. Profit is not possible.

The finite market must split into new businesses. The only other possible
solution to aggregate money, is to reduce prices infinitely to make up for that
difference in cost, to allow those weaker nodes of buyer businesses stuck in
that alternator switch position of buyers, to afford the higher seller
businesses. That sort of supply and demand based deflation, is actually
reverse inflation. Prices are infinitely reduced in that process, but what that
leads to is the same obstructed pathway. Each price line leads to a death
even when reducing prices in this concerted fashion, which is logistically
impossible. The demand for the products is weakened due to higher prices,
forcing sellers to reduce prices to match buyers. But the result is that if that
process were to occur, the finite spectrum macroeconomically would result in
the absurd conclusion that businesess are constantly doing business with the
same 2 businesses, in an infinite gridlock. This gridlocked system forces loss
into the mechanism of economy, of constant use of savings and reduction of
price, to KILL and ELIMIINATE the price tag completely on a transactional
basis, using novel inflationary dollars in reverse. Reduction of price is the
rule, yet probability choice for humans as BUSINESS OWNERS, forces the
market to make no sense (cents, pun intended). It is simply absurd to assume
that businesses are constantly doing business only with one other company,
back and forth, back and forth. That is not ever going to be plausible, and will
never work. The only solution is infinite real time accretions and additions of
new businesses, which cannot ever happen in the real world. Price reduction
is not what you see in the media or in the society, or in the stores; you only
see price increases through inflation and bank loans such the QE4 +
mechanisms and stock picks going higher through NASDAQ and SP500, etc. It
is simply not possible for prices to constantly reduce, and that is enough
information to indict all the companies that are pretending in the united
states and other nations, to do business. Yet I believe that united states is the
only commercial market implicated in this fraud. Even the local mom and pop
store, is implicated in this fraud, as well as the liquor store, or the wong tong
soup joint. All of them are liable for crimes against humanity for pretending to
work.

Companies cannot stock and operate simply based on this blink light, on and
off switch, in the market that occurs constantly, through transactions, from
the FOUNDATION of companies transacting in order to make money. The only
people who can produce goods and services, products --- are companies, and
even black market local stands and companies are implicated in this fraud.
They must constantly buy and sell, and have to mitigate understanding of
producing profit through recoupments of market price. So the fact is from the
business infinitium initium, companies can never produce a market that can
withstand the pressures of society and simply cannot function.

Resultantly, consumers are purchasing from government operated


businesses. These businesses are fully stocked and operated without regard
for profit, and they are controlled in all respects by the government.

Deflation leads to a situation where infinite price reduction is the rule,


through reverse inflation. This is reverse inflation because dollars and cents
are broken into tiny pieces and fractions to create an ostensible market,
meaning that all money is equal in a 1:1 ratio as between companies. A
differential infinitely lower, can never meat a differential infinitely higher.
There is a schism wherein lower prices cannot reach higher prices, since the
direction of COST value numerically is infinitely approaching 0 through
fractions of pennies and denominations. That means you can never have
profit - you can never have a proper market price. Infinity kills the market and
prevents deflation from ever occurring. Probability choice coalesces to
achieve same, wherein businesses transacting as between each other in 2 by
2's, 1 on 1 forever, cannot subsist in that fashion. It is an all or nothing
system within a finite spectrum. If companies want to break from doing
business simply in 1 by 1 fashion, the market would break into more
businesses then there are in real time. That means there can never be any
finite market system. Finite markets are impossible, and they always break
out to more than there really are physically, through amount of businesses.
Deflation is furthermore, impossible.

The basis of the deflation that is discussed, is REMOVAL of money, but we


must realize that this is a farcical concept. Removal of money means removal
of transactional possibilities to accrue money for individual companies.
Removal of money will only lead to relativized inflation. Inflation is the rule,
because NEW money must be injected throughout the economy
geographically, in order to nourish paychecks and other salaries and profits.
That new money prevents the use of savings. In the end, that new money
ends up being SAVINGS at best, external to the market process. Prices are
destroyed by A priori use of savings even on a conceptual level, but in reality
the price line prevents even the conceptual use of this savings because price
and profit differentials are in aggregate destroyed, bit by bit, holistically
throughout the market, with every transaction as between companies.

Consumer money has to be external to the transactional market money in the


system. The reason why is because salaries can never cover costs of the
market. Input costs of business have a differential which can never be
covered, wherein costs external to labor salaries meted out, are not
recoverable by employees. The market subsists off of employees, any one
else is making money from some other source entirely, even with the
consideration of 401ks, pension plans and funds, investment funds, hedge
funds, stock market afficionados, tourists, students etc. Employees cannot
cover business costs on a transactional, 1 by 1, regular basis for the market
for each unit price tag. That means that endemically, NATURALLY,
ORGANICALLY, the market cannot subsist on its own without external
unrepayable dollars. Cash money that is not repayable to a central bank or
otherwise federal credit union, etc.

This is what I dub the black hole of the economics market. There is a gaping
black hole which cannot be filled in without external money, weakening the
whole market and FETTERING the market to external loans for consumers.
This creates a weakest link principle wherein the whole market severably
requires loans and funding by these excess dollars, otherwise the market will
fail in a cascade simply based on a PRICE LINE. The price line balance beam is
shattered, regardless, even with that money consideration. That is a
secondary reasonining, this black hole, for the domino effect instantaneous
shattering of the market. That price line is killed simply by business owners
doing business. Consequently, there is no possibility for consumers to give
life support to the market.

The competition of two businesses, in a price gradient higher vis a vis the
other business in the two set, is the basis by which sales lead to USURPATION
on all sides in the market, top to bottom, bottom to top, left to right, right to
left. This destroyer schematic kills the market because competition is not
allowed in the market. Businesses can only exist as sellers, and they simply
can't have buyers that are other businesses, or any one else for that matter,
to continue as a healthy business that provides for a family or provides
wealth for a tycoon. The government based on GOD's power, promotes a
scenario wherein companies are controlled in all matters, singularly and
comprehensively by the nation state. Federal Income Tax and department of
labor filings will be to no avail to prove that random dudes and dudettes are
owning businesses; this is not some CONCEPT, this is reality. They don't own
a business with a bank account or otherwise, they are LYING. This is not some
effervescent transient philosophical bull shit wherein a bank controls the
whole world, a so called rothschild central bank - no, this is about an average
joe owning a business lying about it. Sounds too stupid to be true, but it is
actually really pathetic, and scientifically 100 percent provable in a so called
newtonian world - TRUE.

There is an illusion in the market wherein transactions can occur in some


fashion, perhaps more than one, but that simply hides the fact that within
every Cascade of prices there is always a weaker buyer, not just a weaker
seller or weaker buyer ONLY, as mutually exclusive entities. So this means the
market simply dies off through the buyer and seller switch, EVEN without
regard to price. Just having a buyer and seller transact, you are stuck in a
scenario that forces those business to span out, to go infinitely ownard to
golgotha - to the passion, to the cross and crucifixion of the market. But in
fact the system fails in just a buyer seller scenario, with a buyer business
higher, and seller business weaker, which means all you really have in the
end are buyers. Sellers fail. From that perspective, the market is completely
killed off in the cascade in a domino effect. Thereby, the concept of there
being multiple transactions is only thought that is never achieved.

In the market sellers are really the only life forms that can exist, that can
make it, a company can only ever sell. Buying is something that implies LOSS
- Selling implies GAIN. That is why companies are there, to GAIN money. This
is why that dichotomy and schism between buying and selling, never works
on a severable, or even AGGREGATE level. Companies simply die off as a
whole, in a domino effect. Pricelines, and price tags, are reified constructs,
that do not even allow for savings to buttress them through time on a
transactional level, with constancy and regularity. That simple price tag
occludes the process of commerce, with banks and all that.

So market process has to occur instantaneously with everyone, all companies


and corporations, SELLING at the same instant in time. That is not
mechanically how the market should ever be. Input costs are the rule for the
commercial milieu, because all companies have to buy a priori before they
sell a posteriori. Disbursements on a primary basis are the foundation for the
market. Secondarily, sales can occur. All businesses have cost requirements
before sale, whether retail or wholesale. Even service industries require
space, equipment, and materials/labor before they can even sell one service
or item. That being said, all costs are input costs. Sales never occur through
profits. This implies not even a 1:1 recoupment for a business purchase (input
cost as defined: costs that a business must provide in order to sell their goods
and services). This actually indicates a loss based market, wherein items that
are sold, lead to at best a salary for employees; this means that businesses
only lose money because sales are not possible, so there is an apparent
market equilibrium where input costs and salaries match with 1 employee per
business. This is an absurd conclusion, that also itemizes the product of each
company to one product, and prevents sales. That in fact disproves keynesian
market equilibrium, meaning that each product sold is equal to a person,
through supply and demand, achieving status equilibrium by having 6 people
buying 6 products. That kind of keynesian equilibrium is disproved as an
internal market disequilibrium, due to loss of price by providing input costs of
salaries. That is a system of entire loss, and in fact no one buys anything and
the business never gains anything at all. There is no possibility of achieving a
recoupment HIGHER than the input cost that was provided.

The fact of the matter is that input costs are provably a compounding
numerical amount relative to profit margins. Profit margins are a game of
chance, but input cost disbursements aggregate, and add up price by price
due to the time lapse. This time lapse proves that concurrent sales recoup
input costs that are already provided by the business before the concurrent
sale, which implies and necessitates inflationary money to buttress prices, to
operate companies. So this doubles, trebles, and quadruples, etc. the prior
costs that a company has. This means that input costs in the market are
always greater than any possible achievement of a sale. This prevents the
market from ever having a profit margin through medium of exchange.

Profit margin differentials are not possible. Price differentials are not possible.
Money and medium of exchange are not possible. Prices are not possible. All
costs will be equilibrated to a 1:1 ratio on the basis of no profit, costs will
mean nothing, and prices will mean nothing.
We must now consider that banks would have to dispense money to
consumers without repayment to even satisfy the infinite inflationary
requirements of this market. That is consumption money that is not used by
investers to establish business. Investers and start ups are not the basis of
this inflationary money that is virally injected into the economic system. The
reason why is because the transactional approach is predicated on sales by
purchasers outside of the market, presumably consumers in the populace at
large. Those people must have money in their hands to purchase
transactionally the materials that businesses provide as products and
services, that money cannot be repayable because it is designed for
consumers, not businesses. Yet that money is to no avail as we realized by
the market being destroyed internally by businesses transacting as amongst
each other.

The fact is that loans are not repayable to begin with to the bank. Each and
every loan is a singular liability. Through transactions repaying your bank loan
cannot be done by someone who already has a bank loan liability, but is only
usurping other loans through sales. Those loans are other people's liabilities.
So what this suggests is that as businesses transact through the domino
effect cascade, loans are unrepayable on principal to the central bank. Loans
are not repayable on principal, much less interest. Each individual business is
liable for their own loan, and other loans cannot be a liability contractually for
that business. That business only has to pay for its own loan, not other
businesses loans, and those other businesses have no means to pay for their
own loans due to transactions and loss of money through purchases. So loans
in aggregate for the market are not repayable based on principal loan
amount, and neither are they repayable based on interest too. Principal is not
repayable. Neither is interest, because that only compounds the amount that
is due on those loans. So bank loans are not repayable, which is a major
break through discussed in this paper. It is not only that bank loans are
infinitely unrepayable due to the interest on the loans which necessitates
getting more loans with interest for the initial loan which is unrepayable, as a
differential higher for each subsequent loan (so in fact all the interest
compounds naturally) - it is that principal by itself is unrepayable.

You must realize that from the production sector, it is impossible to begin with
for natural resources and manufacturing industries to provide for the market.
Those industries must split infinitely, through what I call Economic nuclear
fission. Those companies cannot infinitely sustain themseles each and every
one. These are the companies that are involved with mining, drilling, or
producing materials and equipments that must be yolked together by other
companies in the industry. But even these companies such as Big Oil, Food
companies like Lays, Pepsi, Coca Cola, etc., have to yolk together materials.
We can also include airplane companies or airplane part makers like
American Airlines. These companies have to always fetch materials and
equipments, amenities from other companies in order to produce their
products for sale to RETAILERS, other Manufcaturers, and wholesale stores, as
well as restaurants and service industries such as law offices, medical doctor
officers and hospitals, and mechanic shops.

These companies cannot sustain themseles on their own, otherwise they


would each have infinite resources. So they must split out to find other
businesses, who themselves must also split out. That causes an impossibility
and occlusion of the market, that prevents transactions for these suppliers to
provide to companies within the span of the market. These are the Producers
who cannot provide for themselves, and therefore must span out. So the
market is not possible on this basis of constantly requiring another business
to provide for materials that you need. All materials and equipments that are
sold require a yolking of several goods and materials. That means that each
and every business must fetch multiple businesses and companies, and the
search never stops. Otherwise, each company would stand on its own. Even
in a system with finite natural resources, and a finite amount of industry
sectors and companies - there would be an impossible requirement of infinite
businesses. Every business as a singular Entity must fetch another company,
and even conglomeritzation will not explain this since so many companies
and manufacturers are involved. In the regular market strata, the same
problem occurs. Every business owner must buy materials from a store that is
being sold, such as coffee. If a company buys their coffee and lunch from
another store, then their must be more businesses then there really are in the
finite market, no matter what the census or surveys report.

Infinite loans:

So the market has a blue screen, or black screen of death wherein no


transactions are possible in the finite spectrum. The market requires infinite
loans going up the cascade, to cover the market system. Each loan
represents a market input cost, with the next loan going higher representing
the market price purchase amount for recoupment of the initial input cost
loan. This is an infinite flux, producing infinite loans and infinite market
participants, adding up the ladder. But in any finite context, transactions are
not possible. New businesses are constantly required in real time, at infinite
speed, which is impossible due to low birth rates, finite populations, and finite
resources. This infinite speed creates a problem wherein the market can
never occur, and can only ever imagine to occur through one single
transaction for every business at infinite speed with infinite toilet paper fiat
currency.

Profit is the presumption, but it is always required. Profit insures that a


company is able to cover costs of living expenses and business costs. Both
costs have to be handled. That means in a dynamic process of buying and
selling, a business must cover to some accretion above 0 (the ground zero
being input costs), profit margin. That profit marginal recoupment relative to
the disbursement a business must make to operate business, will allow for
the business owner to actually make money for him or herself. This means
that profit margins ABOVE purchases by a business, for
labor/materials/equipments (this form of shopping) are required. Otherwise a
company will either lose money all the time based on their shopping required
for SELLING (operation of business), or will only obtain through time
constancy only what they sell in a 1 to 1 relationship, which is pointless. A
pointless effort that will only lead to bankrutpcy and homelessness for the
company owner. Therefore a differential and accretion higher than input
costs; a recoupment is required for companies to sustain themselves. So
really what determines profit is the constancy of not having profit. The
constancy otherwise is loss based on reified and also dynamic price changes
through supply and demand. Those processes through time REQUIRE a
constancy of achieving higher prices than when a business disburses costs to
operate business. It is constancy through time that forces profit to be
required, because constancy of loss of profit or achieving sales less than
input costs, will lead to bankrutpcy. That relativization of man power force
effect to achieve HIGHER is perhaps even an unexplainable requirement of
the market for money to even exist.

Profit is the same thing as inflation. Inflation as I discussed in this


groundbreaking assertion and provable fact, is required in the market for
money to be achieved and profits to be achieved at a higher amount than 0
dollars. That means that inflation = profit. Prices = inflation as well. Market
price total is another concept I introduced in my works Market Disequilibrium
and Premeditated Inflation. Market price means the total achievement of a
sale through transactions, through the unit item of a price, which recoups
input costs and achieves a higher amount for living expenses. Living expense
and conditions are costs that a business must guarantee to have an actual
fruitful commercial enterprise that achieves something for the owner instead
of just money to operate a business as a hobby. That would be a waste of
time and effort. Effort is implied as well in the profiteering mechanism. Yet as
we know due to the occlusion of competition between just 2 businesses, or
even more in the market, the whole premise of competition causes a dollar
and cents amount domino effect that prevents business from ever occurring.
In conclusion, a company must always consider profit due to the bifurcation
of living costs (housing costs, bills, food shopping, gas, gym membership,
vacations, coffee, car bills, electricity, rent, mortgages), and business
operation costs - (labor, equipment, materials, electricity, water, rent,
mortgage, heating, gasoline, food) - it must not only consider it, it must have
profit.
The fact is that without profit, the same mechanism occurs. Achieving any
amount above 0 dollars in a currency based system, will achieve profit. The
ground zero must be broken in, and in that process you will find the absurdity
of a system without profit. A system without profit means prices are random,
constantly reducing, constantly achieving nothing for a business besides the
fiction of having a piece of paper as an IOU or promissory note, to achieve
things much higher in actual worth in terms of market demand. People could
afford an airplane for 15 pennies. Even the relativization of price decrease in
that spectrum, though seemingly might work, will still only achieve a proper
profit mechanism. And that is not possible mathematically and PRACTICALLY,
because approaching infinitely reduced dollars and cents, or near 0 values of
money prevents differentials higher that mean profit. For one business to go
lower in their dollar and cent amount in terms of profit margins, relative to
another company going higher, prevents an impossibility mathematically that
is not tenable, and is the reason for the domino effect that kills possibilities of
transactions in the market in any instance, severable or in aggregate for all
companies. 2 by 2, or 1 by 1 companies transacting between each other,
requires infinite businesses to grow and expand in real time in the
subsequent transaction despite any illusion of 2, which breaks the finite
market to no longer be finite, but to be infinite (not finite). The market can't
stay put it is an oroborus with no physical practical location and coagulation.
There is no manifestation for markets using medium of exchange such as
currency.

Consumers have no value in this market. The transactions between


businesses kill and estop any possibility of market transactions based on
healthy business, which means consumers are extraneous. In fact, labor costs
are separate to input cost disbursements between business for goods. No one
buys an employee from another business to operate their own business.
Employees are extraneous and external to this processs - describing, an
external cost for each and every single business as an inflationary input cost
of money external to healthy organic transactions.

The whole system presumes, as discussed, a system wherein business


owners are the key players transacting among other businesses (other
business owners seeking gain in money). That process is what prevents
commercial transactions from occurring on an hourly, daily, weekly, monthly,
quarterly, or yearly basis. Even minute by minute. Domino effect spark plugs
that destroy the market through ticking time bombs of transactions Eliminate
prices and Eliminate the market totally. Savings have no value at all in this
market, yet when applied is the only hypothetical to prevent the market from
failing. These savings kill and Eliminate price, as is.

The stock market applies in the same way. Stock market implies a scenario
wherein commercial transactions provide the MONEY for consumers at large
to provide money to purchase stocks, yet this will be to no avail to provide
profit margins to maintain and nourish the whole commercial market. So
stock market cannot explain how consumers have the money to provide for
those gaps in input costs, as we discussed, with the black hole. Stock market
money must be fraudulent consumer money extraneous to profit margins.
Those profit margins that go toe to toe with stock picks, are completely a
scam and are exemplar proof of accounting fraud such as with Enron, but on
a massive scale implicated every corporation in the SEC.

That money that is used to fuel consumer and business owner (which are
essentially the same thing as purchasers in the market, both employees and
producers are consumers, because as the saying goes America is a consumer
society; well America is really a fraudulent and totally consumer based
society where businesses do not even operate) - stock purchases is money
that is provided as an unrepayable factor. Unrepayable viral money that is
used to create inflationary numerical values of money in the market that are
higher than the amount of dollars in the aggregate for profit margins as a
whole. Dollar for dollar, the businesses are making less than the stock picks
and stocks as a TOTAL. That makes absolutely no sense, and requires
inflationary dollars. Each unit of stock represents a good. If stocks were to
represent something external to unit prices, meaning simply shares, that are
analogous to profits, still the money would have to be unrepayable and
inflationary. That means that money must be external to the market process
as a total. That money has to be unrepayable, greed and cupidity based
money, that is designed to provide for consumers to purchase stocks in the
primary and secondary markets.

Now when we calculate that banks do not lend simply to consumers based on
research, to purchase stocks, but only lend to businesses for investments -
then we can surmise that the process of domino effect that occurs as
between businesses also occurs as for stocks. Stock units are bought and sold
in the same way as business products are bought and sold as between 2
companies back and forth, back and forth in aggregate totalling the whole
stock purchasing community. Stocks in america are said to be bought by less
than 50 percent of the market (insert link). That being said, this money is
fraudulent, to the point that we can comfortably say that the stock market is
a total aggregate macroeconomic and microeconomic fraud. The stock
market dies in any instant of transactions in a unitary price line, in a domino
effect reverse oroborus that achieves no profit or price. Bilateral occlusion
due to price and human choice which requires more and more people then
there are to purchase and sell stocks, than the finite spectrum actually
engaging in that process, is required instantaneously. Otherwise, 2 parties are
constantly playing hot potato in a loss spectrum with the same stocks, and
achieving no profit. Only loss relative to prior purchases, ALL the time on a
constant basis. In this mechanism, constancy is the rule. If you want
something you have to do it constantly. If you want profit you need to
constantly have profit, otherwise it will be constant loss. And percentage of
half loss and half profit will be futile because it will only get you where you
already were. It is a system where you have to achieve majority gains in
dollars and cents with prices, which implies total gains.

The fact is that the system through the domino effect causes a no exit
system through aggregate sales in the geographic span of the market. That
means the only way out is deflation of prices infinitely, or otherwise new
businesses forming in real time, achieving the same result. Infinite
businesses, as in total infinite would be the only way that business could
work, which essentially implies a situation where you have a contradiction of
two infinites: one infinite that is greater than another. The infinite that is
greater is the market price, versus the infinite dollar and cent amount of
input costs. That is a contradicition, which will preclude the market from ever
occurring. A log jam obstruction. If it jams it jams, therefore the market never
works with mediums of exchange of any type. Infinite time and infinite dollars
in a pseudo inflationary system, wherein inflationary dollars and inputs of
money are required, means the system will never work in a practical real
world. The monetary system is a 0 sum game. Infinitely zilch.

So now you must understand, that with higher market prices so high,
businesses can imaginarily subsist of prior savings to operate all concurrent
business operations. But the fact is that without a question, the constancy of
these requirements, means that past sales constantly fund current input
costs of business, which defeats the purpose of the sale for recoupment of
input costs. Even if you were to have 4 times the input cost formula to allow
for that to occur, you are essentially traveling faster than time, through a
presupposed chicanery of using past sales to fund business. But the reality in
practical terms is that concurrency of bills for LIVING EXPENSES of the
business owner, mean that savings also have to be used for the HOUSE and
other costs on a durational basis. It is not only costs of business that matter,
it is also living costs. So this essentially means that the four times theorem is
an illusion. The time future spectrum wherein current prices don't mean
anything except for winning some big lotto of savings to use for future costs,
instead of RECOUPING past disbursements properly with prices and sales -
destroys the market price concept for any single business. It is completely an
illusion. Input cost disbursements can only be recouped in kind with the same
amount mathematically, and in real time can never work. Only God can make
a business work.

There is some concept wherein a fraudulent pool can exist on a


macroeconomic level, with businesses actually operated by the government
and CGI technology creating the appearance of people working. But this
concept is flawed. The whole market can never work, so this concept works
on a microeconomical level not just a macro-level. Some healthy businesses
working within the aggregate pool, surrounding the perimeter of the business
or periphery, or in some minority sense not transacting as amongst each
other, is not possible. Individual businesses do not function with such high
prices relative to input costs, a priori disbursements are always inflationary
dollars regardless, so that is not even a subject of debate. Minority business
warts are not possible within a government operated individual business pool.
People pretending to work is the rule, in a word, yuppie wannabe sinecures,
who have no skills, and are getting government grants. A priori input costs,
that is, a business needs money before any one sale, means that a business
should be retired and is using money all the time before any particular single
sale. Price tags are nullified by savings, and if savings, to prevent from using
rainy day savings in order not to go bankrupt, yet in the end a business is
forced to go bankrupt. Price tags Kill savings.

The formula for the death of price is 2 X Market Price + Infinite. The result of
this process is 0 dollars. In terms of savings it is Price + infinite (in dollars and
cents) as transactions occur through time. Savings have to be the exact same
price doubled. Yet savings is never used. The price line cascade precludes
any use of savings in real time, businesses are split as between sellers and
buyers that cannot conduct business with eachother based on profit
gradients going higher in terms of market price. There is a schism, a
presumed differential that prevents commercial transactions; prices being
reduced might be a route out of that declivity and concerted price changes
which are logistically impossible as a whole market and even as between
severable cascades of businesses. However, that will be to no avail because
every business will have the same amount when transacting between each
other. At the same time, companies are stuck doing business between each
other, playing hot potato, achieving nothing but loss. The only other solution
is increasing business to split the finite into more and more companies, yet
that is not possible, in real time. So the market has no possibility of ever
occurring.

Market prices singularly achieve an Explosion required to mitigate all future


input costs, already meted out in ONE SHOT with one single item or service
sold - to prevent the market from ever occurring. The gambling gradient of
achieving profit is thus never a possibility, because business is futile. IT is just
one big lump sum salary of infinite dollars achieved by this price. What that
implies however is that the infinites of costs and sales, the equivalency and
concurrency of those amounts - means that what you are achieving is not 12
dollars back for a 6 dollar disbursement. In other words, a business is not
selling an item for 12 dollars for spending 6 dollars on some equipments. A
business is in fact spending 6 dollars and obtaining back 6 dollars - which is a
1 to 1 ratio that implies companies achieve nothing. All that effort of business
will never, through time, mean anything --- that means on a quantum level,
something I call haghighat instead, a Persian word; there is only an illusion of
transactions that is easily debunked when considering practicality of
existence. Under a microscope this unexplainable force is easily destroyed, in
the same way that differntial calculus of the price line cascade is destroyed in
the market as a whole, preventing transactions and price.

Price is destroyed by 2 times meaning any market tag must be increased by


twice the amount, but the infinite wheels of the market mean that any price
tag will once again be doubled, requiring infinite amounts of savings. Price
reduction or REVERSE inflation, is simply not possible, because that would
create an equivalency of dollar tags and profit margins in the market, thus
destroying the purpose of money. Currency being equal at a constant rate for
all market participants all the time (profit margins), means that money has no
value. Without differentials, you are always at 0, at ground zero. In order for
money to have value there must be some people that have more than others.
And for that reason, prices are destroyed in commerce, requiring more and
more dollars to pretend to make it work, and creating a unity in the market.
Infinite savings vats for all businesses, from fortune 500 companies to
convenience stores and antique stores in the hinterlands of New Jersey? That
is simply not possible, and therefore the market as a whole never works.

The buyer and seller switch of positions throughout the cascade during the
cascade commercial transactions, means that some businesses cannot
transact with other businesses because they are at that time stuck as buyers
versus a seller, and yet they cannot afford down or up the cascade the other
businesses goods. This alternator switch of positions, is immutable and
blockades transactions. As a whole the market works on a micro level, in that
2 businesses working together, leads to an outward push, while other
businesses must through a penumbra of time during the work week also
transact. If they are not transacting at that time they are out of business and
will go bankrupt. So businesses transact at around the same time, yet it
makes no difference as to what happens down the cascade. Buyers and
sellers switch in a declivity that will automatically break into half sellers
higher and half buyers weaker down the cascade steps preventing market
transactions. This is what I dub the price line. ( See chart). The seller higher
and buyer weaker cascade automatically splits into that spectrum from one
unitary transaction within that penumbra of time, or otherwise not within that
penumbra of time.

Volume sales achieve the same result, only requiring more business weaker
buyers to arrive for every transaction. The amount of businesses stays the
same, but the requirement of amounts of businesses will increase relative to
the finite business amount.
Volume sales are in fact an illusion, competition is the basis of the market,
Business works on the basis of 2 companies competing. The whole market
dies off in an instant based on this premise. New businesses are required in
the cascade of prices in the price line. The fact is that volume sales require
constant new businesses, finite businesses in the cascade of loans cannot
function through exchanges and transactions. Volume sales beget new
businesses. The finite cascade of loans will lead to the same result of half
weaker buyers and half stronger sellers, meaning that no transactions can
occur. Any finite severable cascade throughout the geographic span of the
market will achieve the same result. Volume sales are an illusion that will not
produce anything more than the requirement of adding in real time new
businesses that are not there. Any finite set simply dies in an instant, it is a
futile effort for business entities to transact. New corporations being added
on in real time is the basis of volume sales, and that will not achieve
anything. Volume sales always imply that new companies are added on to the
cascade, meaning other businesses that are in the finite set are not
transacting in that moment. Cascades add on in real time when volume sales
are implicated. Businesses that are not transacting simply are not doing
business, they are just wasting time and losing money. The businesses that
do transact, will require new businesses appearing in real time, at infinite
speed.

All set cascades of prices are stuck in seller and buyers blocks. This is a
terminology I created to demonstrate how the market always ends up with a
situation wherein there are half Higher priced sellers and half weaker buyers.
So volume sales imagine additional businesses added in real time that are
not there, or otherwise a waiting game for a few businesses to do multiple
purchase and sale transactions, that are to no avail. The market is totally
occluded. Markets that are stuck in one spot are left to the same scenario due
to transactions. You see, in every cascade of prices there is a weaker buyer.
Weakest buyers die off because they have no one to buy from, since there are
no weak sellers. So what this implies is that the Cascade price line, which is a
profit gradient salad and forms naturally due to transactions, and even same
priced businesses end up creating differentials where in one business is
higher than the other (after a buy and sale transaction), will always be in the
formation of Higher Buyer and lower Seller, ad infinitum. That means the
system is Bsbs. Bs stands for bullshit; thus the market is bullshit, and never
works. What this means is that the cascade will always, embedded in any
severable cascade, or as a total, end with half the market being a sellers
block, and half the market being a buyers block (half higher sellers, and half
weaker buyers). Consumers cannot affect this process as businesses transact
between each other. That is a wholly separate system, with a very thin black
line that separates those two aspects of the market. What happens between
companies, is wholly separate between what happens with consumers.
So volume sales imply constant flux of businesses, that when controlled in
the finite set, end up not being able to transact. Once every single business
actually puts money into use to purchase or sell products (in grouping
couplets of 2's), the end result will always be Sssbbb, etc. Down the price
line cascade, preventing profit gradients and prices above ground 0.

There is also implications of a geographic time wasting, time element, if


companies want to do multiple transactions down the cascade. It means that
some businesses have to wait for others to transact...but in the mean time
they are not doing anything during the working hours. Once they do, they are
stuck invariably, unequivocally, unmitigatingly, with no vicissitude, in a
domino effect where in there is one Higher Buyer, and one lower priced seller,
causing the death knell for the whole market in a complete Elimination of
price.

In the market there are 2 competitive aspects in a schism, that competition


proves that the market never works, and volume sales will always lead to the
same conclusion. Geographically cascades build up, separated by states and
valleys/rivers/highways --- this means every geographic location of
businesses does transactions within their own zone or sphere. Once those
transactions are complete in that limited region, new companeis are required
for the VERY NEXT transaction based on the BS schematic of price line. Those
companies cannot form in real time at infinite instantaneous speed, it is not
physically possible using bank loans etc. Volume sales are completely
farcical, and unitary transactions between two companies are the rule. Any
how, the market works as a totality within a penumbra of time. Companies in
California are working WHILE companies in New Jersey are working. They all
require new businesses within their RESPECTIVE spheres, that force new
companies in. Volume transactions cause the New Jersey company to be tied
to the Cali company (which doesn't even exist and is not owned by certain
sinecure moguls of whatever ethnic group they say rules america) - which
would mean that business would have to be hold in abeyance. Yet when it
actually occurs, the same thing happens and the whole thing goes down in a
domino effect due to the Seller and Buyers block cascade. This is a domino
effect and that is all it will ever be, with no gain. Companies do not seek out
new businesses outside their sphere to tie the whole market into one big
chain, there are tiny chains all around doing business and circling into no
where. A stupid place with no gain in money - all loss, no gain in currency.
Connecting all the nodes either way would lead to the same result. New
businesses are required constantly to total infinite, any other consideration is
an illusion, and the foundation of the market, that is businesses - JUST BASED
on transacting between each other in blinks of 0 achievement, prevent the
market from existing on profit, money, or price.

The government controls all the goods and services.


The fact is that cascades build on this premise. Based on a seller and buyer
commercial transaction, the Buyer's price becomes higher and the buyer
ALTERNATOR switches to a Higher price seller relative to the weaker buyer,
who was once a seller. That then begets a Higher Buyer for the Higher Seller,
creating a trio of businesses. A trilateral confectionary stand which gets
Eliminated. Now when the Higher buyer (with higher loan or monetary
amount) purchases the Higher buyer becomes the highest Seller relative to a
price line cascade going down of 2 weaker buyer businesses in terms of
profits and price. That produces three companies, with only One seller, and 2
weakest link buyers that die off. If you were to continue you can add a
weaker seller for the third buyer company, but each company has to transact
ONE AT A TIME with each other company, otherwise there would be a jam in
the system. That is axiomatic. It is a one by one transactional system, the
monetary market. As you can see after this transaction occurs now you have
a weaker seller and a weaker buyer, who was once a weaker seller. That
means you have 2 Sellers, and 2 weaker buyers when the transactions end
with all businesses in the end. These businesses are being added on in real
time, which is impossible. They are appearing out of thin air to supply the
original 2 that were transacting, or 3. And in the end when transactions occur
through the alternate switch of buyer and sellers, you get a buyer and sellers
block, just as in the original cascade.

The cascade is a complete illusion in which The Bs rules the transaction. BS


smells that the buyer and seller cascade always leads to a half higher seller
and half weaker buyer blockade, no matter what. If businesses are added in
real time, which impossible, that Basis of 1 by 1 and 2 by 2 transactions
cannot be obfuscated in the market. Weaket buyers are extraneous in the
cascade and always die off so that Higher buyer vs. weaker seller is the rule
throughout the commercial system. Higher Sellers cannot achieve a market
satisfaction by consumers to adjust this process, since this whole system is
fettered and theatered and chained to the business model price line. That
means the domino effect kills business from beginning to end. Any severable
cascades or POSSIBILITIES of tying up cascades through buyer and seller
businesses in the switch off, will make no difference to the outcome in
regards to those particular cascades. Seller and Buyer blockades kill the
market severably, and in the AGGREGATE holistically and comprehensively.
The market dies in one fell swoop, and requires new businesses to make the
market work that are not there. That means infinite businesses, due not just
because of bilateral choice occlusion, but a God ordained coalescence of
probability choice to not do business just between two businesses (total
monetary loss and stupidity that will NEVER happen because all business go
to new businesses at a constant rate, and even a semi constant rate will
preclude the bilateral lock down) - but also because of the profit gradient
between two businesses due to input cost recoupment with a higher market
price differential upward for the business that originally was a buyer and then
becomes a seller business.

In bits and pieces throughout the market, in little groupings or big groupings,
weakest buyers die off and the domino effect cascade kills the price, meaning
that higher buyers and lower sellers are the rule in the market, killing off
transactions into a Half seller and Half weaker buyer market, with no place to
go. Not even downward with concerted supply and demand based lowered
prices for finite sellers to match weaker buyers. This means that finite
markets are not possible. Only INFINITE markets are possible, but can never
work because they don't stay put in terms of man power, business, people,
market participants, producers, consumers - and in terms of monetary
amounts of loans and prices.

The three by 1 mechanism of volume sales where higher buyers and weaker
sellers add on, typifies an illusory halllucinational mechanism of obfuscating
that the market is really a system of just 2 businesses, severably that work
together to realize that the market must work INSTANTANEOUSLY, in one flat
line of 0 dollar price - aka total loss when dollars and currency is meted out.
That means that every business dies together, and a concept of a buyer and
seller as two different things split out throughout the market simply cannot
work. Businesses must always sell, which means business owners can never
use money to buy, which means money can never exist and is always at 0.
The implication in the opposite direction is that every one has the same
amount of wealth, which kills the basis of currency.

The switch discussed where in Buyers and sellers infinitely trade places,
allowing for the market to subsist in a finite sense without falling prey to the
domino effect, implies a system wherein new companies are added on in real
time instantaneously and infinitely due to probability choice and a futile profit
gradient = that means the constancy of bilateral occlusion requiring NEW
businesses as an anodyne leads to total infinite black screen of death for the
market. New businesses are required infinitely, and the market cannot
physically stay finite, and even if it did, would NEVER work. Duh. so that is
not a possibility.

The volume sale system where in unitary transactions do not kill the market
in an instant - that phony system, implies a mechanism of Higher Seller and
weaker buyer, down the price line. BS BS BS. SBSBSB. Then finally ending in
SSBSBB. The final conclusion is Half sellers higher and half buyers weaker
down the cascade of prices. So that is essentially three transactions
throughout cascades in the market. Severable or in aggregate. But that is, as
discussed, an illusion wherein Buyers higher and sellers weaker kill the
market down the price line cascade, leading to the same Seller and Buyers
Blockade, that occludes the market. The one buyer and seller switch in the
middle proves that there is only One seller and One buyer. Essentially, One
higher seller, and one weaker buyer. The supplantation of buyers is the basis
of the market, ad infinitum, because it seems as if sellers can achieve buyers
from consumers, but they are a non entity. Either way, new businesses at the
rate of 1/2 are required to be added on to the market. That is final.

Now it's time to discuss the constancy of a system wherein bills and input
costs are dealt with as a result of accruing past sales and profits. That means
that no current sale by a business will ever cover bills, and that only past
sales will cover those bills. The reason why is because there is a concurrency
with living expenses and business expenses. It is not only business expenses
that will have to be covered by past sales, in order to cover future market
price tags. Living expenses and bills will also occur at the same time. So the
only way to run a minority business is if you live with your parents and get
stipends. You will not be able to cover those expenses strictly on the price tag
on a constant basis. It is regularity that determines this process. Any other
regularity, will require inputs of money that a business would have to steal,
an inflationary process wherein money would have to be stolen to cover
business costs prior to any sale. This is an all or nothing mechanism. If you
are regularly using money you don't have, that means you don't have the
money and are a thief and should be bankrupt. If you are regularly using
money that you made from a previous sale to cover COSTS of living and
business, then you don't need to sell anything. The latter is not possible, you
would already be retired and it simply will not work. Price tags would be too
high relative to input costs, which would be pennies on the dollar. Even if that
were the case, it still would not work and would defeat the purpose of
business, because of the mechanism in which input costs and living costs
coalesce into one. All purchases are input costs. There is a force that on a
haghigat level (replacement for stupid phrase quantum), proves that a
business can never make profit, relative to disbursements. Bills have
concurrency and that prevents accrual of currency, in terms of the bifurcation
for a business owners living costs and business costs. This nullifies the price
tag, because it implies that savings on a constant CURRENT basis promotes
all costs of living. No current sale will ever COVER what is previously
expended. The self sufficiency factor disproves business, and it is also not
mathematically possible in real time, due to the fact that input costs are
infinite units of currency and POSSIBLE returns can only ever be infinite units
of currency.

Money that you don't have is the rule for business, meaning businesses can
NEVER make business. Otherwise a business will go bankrupt, which is
tautological. This means the goverment controls every business. Sales and
price tags accrue on an individual level for one business vis a vis a fraudulent
pool that is aggregate for the whole market presumably, yet the same result
will be achieved that no current sale ever covers your bills. That is a
contradiction that makes no sense. That means you already made a killing -
YOU ALREADY HIT THE JACK POT and the differential of profit on a UNITARY
level for one business or a small minority, will still not work next to a majority
that never works based on a connected DOMINO EFFECT. The domino effect is
the loss mechanism, and on a unitary level there is a God ordained force that
pevents conducting business.

Four time the input cost as a total market price is only a CONCEPT. IT implies
retirement and the occlusion for the possibility or need for more market
transactions, past this one SALE. Minority "wart" businesses in the periphery
of a government operated pool that is ruled by fraud is not possible. It is
easily disproven on this premise. There is a SABOTAGE, an explosion of price,
that goes infinitely outward and upward to prevent transaction. This sabotage
and dilation of price proves that transactions are not possible and require
going future in time, and the chicanery of using previous sales to cover future
costs of future price tags ALL the time, is only an illusion that never works in
the real world.

The major premise of this paper is that Inflation is required in the market, in
order for prices and costs to occur due to providing money to workers and
business owners, without the use of savings. That is, novel money is required
on a per transaction basis to PREVENT the use of savings, aka, bankruptcy.
Inflation is required for the PRICE tag of every business, on a PER unit level,
which means that if that inflationary money is not used for any one single
company, savings has to supplant that money. The opposite result would be
the business would have to use rainy day savings which means bankrutpcy.
Yet at the same time, this DESTRUCTION and elimination of price with savings
still is not possible because prices are not possible to begin with just BASED
on the price tag, irregardless of inflation and savings. Inflation is a panacea
for the system that simply never works, but HYPOTHETICALLY it is the only
tool that can make the market work.

Deflation as a product of removal of money of the system, is simply not


possible. it implies that transactions are not occurring at all either for a small
group of businesses or more. Still that money would have to arrive from some
form of RELATIVIZED INFLATION, or accretion above 0 dollars to maintain
business. This means that deflation as a product of removal of the money
supply by central banks selling treasury bonds of the state, or banks calling
back loans, simply does not work. That is a fiction and never occurs. Deflation
has to be an aggregate deflation, in other words, removal of the money
supply has to be more than what is INPUTTED in terms of inflationary dollars.
So $600,000,000 has to be removed relative to $300,000,000 for there to be
actual deflation. The $300,000,000 can be removed before or after the
$600,000,000, and yet it will still be deflation. Yet if the banks add money to
the system after massive aggregate deflation, or any aggregate deflation,
that will be a RELATIVIZED inflation. Money always has to be added in order
for the system to work. Prices breaking down into infintisemal levels will only
lead to the result wherein automatically that system will equate to EQUAL
salaries for all, which means money is nullified. Yet transactions will not ever
occur on this basis, because price reduction means nothing.

The one thing you must realize is that this is an all or nothing system that
works in severable, as above so below, also in aggregates. Both work on the
same principle. If the whole thing doesn't operate and falls, so does the unit
level of that whole thing. The fact is that there has to be a differential of
conducting business with inflation on a constant basis for the whole MARKET,
meaning for each INDIVIDUAL business, for it to possibly function. But it
never will. Price reductional deflation is actually reverse inflation, because it
has to be concerted and has to consider LOSS transactions that occured just
before the sale in which prices are reduced. That implies SAVINGS, and yet
this system will never work because the whole market requires infinite
businesses, and profit gradients of any kind are destroyed based on the
domino effect macroeconimically, and microeconomically.

The system operates on a premise of a weak business that always exists,


forcing EVERY OTHER BUSINESS to be covered on a reliance mechanism. All
the companies are tied to gether on the basis of price tag in the aggregate
and in severable, and need to be buttressed by consumer purchases, yet still
as between each other they fall in an instant infinite speed domino effect
based on price line slope. Consumer purchases can allow for sales to be
meted out, but the geographical span of the market would imply that this
inflationary money, with the faucet always on, would reach ridiculous high
numbers for money supply (M1, M2, M3) and would require consumers to be
richer than business owners. These consumers would have to congregate in
every business, every town, constantly supplying transactional money - novel
current money, otherwise the domino effect will take hold for those
businesses not fraudulently covered this way. Meanwhile the domino effect
will occur anyway as a result of the priceline as between businesses
transacting with other businesses. This means that the system is doomed to
fail even without consumers, who are external to the market. Price requires a
doubling by savings due to this weak business, who inevitably is a buyer
business in the blink lights on and off of transactions on a unitary flat line.
This business is doomed to fail and it is a sliding gradient. This buyer
business exists everywhere in the market in the alternate switch framework -
in fact, the market necessitates it. Every market has a Seller Company, and a
subsequent CORRESPONDING buyer company, that it transacts with, this
means the system is based on loss.

The fact is even reducing prices as a whole to mitigate the loss factor due to
the weakest buyer business who must use savings it does not have and is
going bankrupt due to competition with other busienss, will lead to the same
result. In every price line there is a weakest link that will kill the whole
market. Even if the weakest link is covered monetarily, that would mean all
the other companies are covered monetarily as well, external to purchases
and sales with inflationry money. The price line forces competition no matter
what, as between companies because companies must always transact with
other companies, in 1 by 1, and 2 by 2 fashion up the slope. This means
competition between companies is what kills the market essentially, and
weakest buyer businesses are scraped off and are dead cells. The rest of the
market will end in B.S. coronational fashion. The weakest company does not
necessarily even have a profit margin that represents in weakness or strength
which disproves supply and demand. The fact is that every company needs to
be covered in terms of sales ALL the time by inflationary dollars external to
the market, and those who aren't will die off, because they would be the ones
requiring savings to operate (which means bankruptcy). That kind of
coverage will however, not stop the market from falling! The market will fall
due to competition between companies in the price line. The savings principle
of prices being double for every business infinitely, in oroborus fashion, will
not ever come to fruition. This implies that savings external to sales due to
LOSS between competing businesses of buyers and sellers, will destroy price
entirely for every company. But that will never occur.

Market Price X 2, with the other portion of the market price coming from
savings money external to transactions proves that savings kills the price, yet
the price line kills the price on its own, preventing even the use of this
savings. The point is that the companies as a whole in the market spectrum,
require savings additional to the price because price alone will NEVER cover
profits and living expenses for companies. That is what 2 times the market
price means, the addition of the price in terms of savings dollars and cents
amounts means. That is what the formula indicates. So it is actually a
representation, a SYMBOL of what can never occur due to the absurdity. The
proper formulation is that savings must equal the PRICE tag + infintie
savings, due to the infinite rolling wheel and cogs of transactions through
time in a dynamic process. This process implies infinite savings and inflation
EXTERNAL to price and sales, that defeats the business internally, externally,
and cohesively.

When prices are weakened by weaker buyers not able to cover higher seller
companies, weakened prices won't mean anything because all the businesses
will still have to be covered by money, otherwise one of the businesses will
go bankrupt causing a domino effect instantly in the cascade throughout the
whole market. The problem here arises wherein all the companies will need
external inflationary dollars outside of what they make in transactions as
between each other, that will mean that price is eliminated by 2 times +
infinite. Savings bubbles are the rule.

In austrian economics, there is a concept discussed regarding booms and


busts. The boom and bust cycle, implies that low interest rates mean that
businesses will boom with higher prices and stock picks. Yet when supply and
demand proves that investments were mismatched and poorly conceived,
companies will fall and consumers who invested will fall in bankrutpcy. But in
fact the banks are proven to use chicanery with higher interest rates in order
to prevent loans from skyrocketing, and thwarting investments for
businesses. Prices will thus reduce on the basis of lower demand for products
since businesses/corporations/and consumers will not have money to buy and
invest in products. So the supply is too high relative to demand, and company
outputs be overstocked, causing a lowered price. But this is all a scam, a
concept that never occurs on this level. Bank loans for businesses and stock
purchasing consumers (if that ever even happens, which it does not), never
occur. Businesses never use banks - loans are all unrepayable on principle
alone much less interest. Principle loans are individual liabilities for individual
business entities (this can even mean multiple partners in a business or
shareholders taking out a loan, or a family), therefore no loan is actually
repayable. Competition between markets only usurps loans, which thereby
enhances liabilities for banks because they now have most of their loans
unrepayable to them, and a waste of resources in lending, which means that
only a few businesses at best can pay back loans --- however through time
those loans are not repayable ever. The boom and bust cycle is only
imagination, because central banks do not lend in this fashion and prices do
not go upward in this fashion, and thus are not reduced by a destructive bust
with higher interest rates raising the cost of loans and thus causing markets
to fall in the aggregate.

Inflation and savings bubbles are the rule, which kills price, and never allows
for business. Bilateral occlusion, which is based on choice pretty much causes
the weaker buyers implicated in every domino effect unitary transaction
through the Bsbsbs spectrum, to require newer and newer companies. Those
half weaker buyers require newer companies to add up in real time. That is
the implication of that gradient and split. Otherwise more money has to be
added for those companies to even transact due to having higher sellers
which they cannot afford with their own sales through time.

Sliding gradients of weaker buyer businesses proves that in any finite set
within the aggregate this will occur, a weaker buyer dies off and buyers and
sellers as between 2 companies die off due to competition. Buying implies
loss, and Selling implies gain of dollars and cents. One company wins and the
other loses. The price line kills the market. The whole market can be
buttressed by consumer sales allowing for a scenario wherein it seems as if it
could work, but it will not work because that kind of transactional support
outside of business dollars (which naturally fall in terms of competition
between companies), means that money is there ALL the time and there is no
gradient within companies in terms of dollars and cents. Every company has
the same amount of money in terms of profit margin. The fact is that within
the price line it is already implied that new companies need to arrive,
DOUBLE the amount of the price based on half weaker buyers in any
aggregate price line. This is what we call bilateral choice preclusion.

Input costs have holes in them that prove that consumers must have more
money than the businesses endemically, or even SALARIED employees as a
result of salaries not mitigating other costs of business. Salaries are only one
portion of business, as we discussed in the black hole of input costs. That gap
is filled in by external money on its own. This means that there is a sliding
gradient due to the black hole of input costs. Businesses that are supplied for
all of their input cost by other purchasers, will have to obtain that money
from fraudulent dollars external to business. Employees of businesses in the
whole cannot supply that money, neither can company owners. That is one of
the main sources of fraud in the market, this external inflationary money.
That money however, cannot geographically supply every business in the
scope of the market. It is certainly a theoretical possibility if 75 percent of the
market was covered by this inflationary fraudulent money, for the rest of the
25 percent of the market to be covered by these business owners on a
regular basis to prevent the use of savings for the businesses that are not
constantly covered transactionally by new money. However, the market
cannot subsist on those dollars regardless. Those dollars are inflationary as a
result of the price line, and also the fraud due to the black hole of input costs.
That money has to arrive because competition BETWEEN BUSINESSES, kills
the market in an instant. The foundation is rotten, so the rest is only a
specious imaginary design. This is why inflation is required.

Companies that are buttressed by fraudulent money, might be able to


support other companies in the finite scale, but those companies cannot
support the minority that is supported by consumer sales. The minority
companies supported by fraud already are supported by the fraud, those
other companies could never have the mathematical dollar amount to cover
the minority businesses whose input cost holes are filled in by fraudulent
dollars. This is actually the transactional basis by which inflation is always
required. In any pool within the market, transactions for each business
require new money, inflationary money, businesses cannot rest either
severably or in aggregate on their own bank accounts for business, it would
imply a weak link that would die off due to competition, if not more. In the
end we find many weak link buyers when the domino effect kills the cascade
and eliminates price.
Fraudulent money used by companies to support other companies, or even a
totally fraudulent market with dollars supplied by market consumers who
constantly buy everywhere external to business employee paychecks, will not
change that COMPETITION between businesses in the price line kills the
possibility of price. Businesses need to buy from other businesses that are
supply goods and materials, NOT from average joe or even yuppie joe
consumers. They buy from companies. So that is the reason why the whole
market dies and the foundation cannot allow for the market to continue.

Companies would have to sue savings to purchase from other companies as


weaker businesses. Salaried employees never can on the premise of the
black hole which means other input costs such as labor and materials
subsume the possibility of the market ever occurring naturally on its own. In
the end, this process of fraud is to no avail even if the whole market was and
is constantly covered by external unrepayable greed based loans, through
CONSUMERS.

Prices die no matter what. All the prices are the same: a flatline 0 that never
achieves any gain or substance. The whole market never occurs. Therefore
the government controls all businesses, and there are no business owners on
an individual level.

Input costs are always theroetically more than profit, and in practicality that
is the case. Profit at best can be a recoupment of a 1:1 to input costs, and
that is never going to create a proper differential in price or profit margins.
Profit schisms are to no avail, in any finite set that actually wants to conduct
business without a government support. The principle of savings killing price
seems still "plausible" with fraudulent bank accounts, but that is not the case.
In the end, bilateral occlusion prevents that and it is a wasted effort that will
never occur. Pretending to run a business this way is not possible, and not
practical, and two companies playing hot potato forever will not be possible
due to human choice, never mind montary loss at a constant rate that
defeats business.

Sliding gradients of weak links is always the basis - those that are covered
fraudulently survive, but that will not change the outcome due to the price
line cascade which never works and is ELIMINATED and obstructed.

If the market was covered geographically at 75 percent with consumers who


had that kind of money to supply companies, they would have to be in
parallel cohortion and cabalistically supporting companies to provide those
that are working "healthily", and this is only a hypothetical. That means 75
percent of the market would be implicated in a fraud of making money
external to business based on that finite set. Those other weak links who
might get money in this process from this aggregate sliver will not change
the final outcome that even this level of fraud will die due to the PRICE LINE
as between companies. Yet retirement would still be the rule here. Too many
people with A LOT of money external to paychecks. Savings money.
Paychecks would be ancillary to budgetations. There are too many yacht
owning yuppies working at 711.

From there we can surmise that employees must be working during the day.
Consumers such as business owners are working, they cannot supply that
transactional money on a day to day hourly basis, to cover paychecks on an
inflationary level. That's how companies make their profits. Too many people
are working during the weeks, months, quarters, and years for business to
continue. So the market is never possible based on people working. People
who are retired or rich are small in number to cover the whole geographic
span with this inflationary money, and business owners who theoretically
could, are working during the days. So there is no way for transactions to
happen this way. Waiting on one group of fraudulent savers to travel state
lines to pay for your products, is not possible during the work day you must
have money by the hours to cover your bills as a business owner. That is the
reliance mechanism that precludes the market. Tourists are small in number,
and what you see every day is not tourists at barnes and nobles, or the mall,
or guitar center --- those are average people. The people who are hanging out
every day at these stores and shops, are people who SHOULD BE WORKING.
They should not be consuming at these hours. That proves that this system is
a fraud in and of itself, and any survey will prove it. You cannot be a business
that relies on weekend warriors to pay your bills. You need to constantly have
customers, and that shows there is an untenable contradiction in the market
that Eliminates the market.

Premeditated Inflation my treatise in 2013 proved that inflation is required


and used by the rich. I discussed how inflation is used to allow for nominal
changes in salaries to grow yet real wealth on a relativistic basis does not
change, providing the illusion to the masses that they are making more
money. Wealth distribution schematics allow for this mechanism to occur, by
central banks and big corporations. But at the same time, the only way a
business or corporations can make many times the rate of inflation is to
provide for massive amounts of currency. This allows for companies to make
much more than the rate of inflation and gain REAL wealth in compettion with
other companies and salaried afficionados and entrepeneurs. Money always
works through making another person feel small. One person or company
must make MORE than the other for their MONEY or Medium of exchange, to
have wealth and value. IF the differentials are too close, there is less wealth.
That is why inflation is used in this way to increase wealth for certain market
participants, relative to others. Meanwhile prices rise and salaries rise,
making people think they are actually making more money, while a few (the
top 40 percent) are making the actual MORE money relative to changes in
money supply. What that means is that inflation is conceived as a change in
salary nominal amounts, relative to prices. How can salaries go higher than
the rate of prices in aggregate? severably this is also the case. The whole
thing is that aggregates and severables work together. Salaries going higher
than the rate of inflation means that people are buying things that are not
there. They have money to buy things that are not there, yet inflation always
implies PRICES changing. Inflation requires going above the rate of inflation,
otherwise salaries DO NOT CHANGE. Salaries stay the same, real wealth stays
the same, only nominal figures change. This relativization principle proves
that inflation is not possible. Going above the rate of inflation with salaries,
cannot be possible because it implies prices are equivalent to salaries. This
one to one process means that net profits and salaries are equivalent,
meaning prices that are meted out are equal to input cost disbursements,
and market price higher than input cost recoupments on a strict unit price
level are not possible. Therefore profit is never possible. Only fraud is
possible, and it leads to no conclusion to achieve sales due to the price line.
Infinite dollars of inflation are required yet the system cannot work on this
infinite principle alone. Prices being equal to salaries at all times is really the
only way this system works, meaning there can never be inflation. Yet to have
profit you need salaries to be ABOVE prices, (if prices were above salaries you
would have only loss). So going above the rate of inflation means you just
have extra money that is never going to be use. The only time money can be
used is if you have input costs disbursements that are recouped at the same
dollar and cent amount as the actual disbursement, not higher for profit using
a market price differential.

So inflation is not possible. Inflation requires going above its own rate, which
is a contradiction to begin with. Inflation requires salaries to go above the
rate, and that will lead to no causation for profit to occur in the market
macroeconomically or microeconomically.

On a one to one basis this is obvious since 2 businesses cannot transact more
than once using a purchase and sale mechanism, without resorting to the loss
of profit and necessity for savings to continue. The actual price means
nothing in the end. Prices are destroyed on this basis because profit is
destroyed.

Inflation is the rule for prices to go above 0 dollars, but 0 dollars is all you get
and profit and inflation (transitive equals) are never achieved in any
spectrum on the market on a 1:1 basis between 2 businesses, or in groups of
3's or 4's for the whole market.

The fact is that higher salaries and profits relative to prices makes no sense,
it means that fraud is occurring. Price tags have within them only a portion
that is for labor, the rest for other expenses of business such as heating and
electricity, equipments, lunch, etc. - What that means is that fraud is
necessary for inflation to be higher than the rate of inflation, in other words
for SALARIES to be higher than prices. If that is the case in any aggregate
spectrum, which is clearly the case often for the market wherein 50 percent is
making more than the rate of inflation on some percentage basis based on
the CPI - then that means fraud is everywhere. The black hole of input costs
(labor cannot satisfy profits for the market) means that is what is required.
Yet at the same time, Even if the market was conducted by wholesale
monetary fraud on the basis of consumption, the price line would preclude
any type of business transactions that are more than just a waste of time and
total loss. Market disequlibrium loss is the rule (See my book Market
Disequilibrium 2013) -meaning that the whole market is a loss based
mechanism due to companies meting out salaries at best. When that occurs
money is lost and the whole market dies on a one company basis aggregating
and compounding with many businesses in the finite business spectrum. It is
a loss because you are just taking out bank loans and losing money, you will
never be able to repay those loans through business. Stock markets as we
have discussed also prove this is a fraud. Secondary stock markets propelling
prices higher and higher relative to profit margins just does not make any
sense - and they have their own price line for consumers killing even that on
the basis of some external gambling video game for the internet (fantasy
sports). Price line kills the whole market for both stock markets and bond
markets, securities and assets, as well as for companies.

Geographically if all these retired money junkies are there, business owner
(who is also a consumer of course, as this is discussed throughout) - for them
to cover those who are in need of that monetary transactional nourishment
for those others to prevent going bankrupt by relying on transactions with
savings instead of paychecks --- that would also be to no avail for all the
reasons discussed. Those people should be working, and even if they did
cover those other businesses, the priceline cascade would kill the market.

On an international market spectrum, the price line kills the whole market as
well. So severalized central bank based market systems on a national level,
does not change the result that the price line can compound with various
countries, under different currencies that are compared using the Forex and
currency pair trading, into one international currency - that price line cascade
slope kills the market all the way through. Buying and selling switches are the
atoms, THE ATOM that prevents market transactions. Currency is nullified.
Fiat or gold, or bitcoin or otherwise. There is only one nation anyway, with
one central bank and that is the federal reserve, besides Iran. Perhaps south
america too. But if you were to have many nations that would be the principle
that within the nation the price line and all these factors kill the market, and
therefore externally through trade surpluses and deficits of products sold over
seas and between nation state lines, the whole market dies in a corrupted
domino effect reverse oroborus to nowhere. Loss is the rule in terms of
market disequilibrium. Prices aggregate as nodes in a massive slope. The
Buyer Seller Bullshit (BS) mechanism kills the market in one fell swoop and
there is no possibility of commerce externally or internally between nations.
GDP's, gross domestic products are not going to change that and are fictions,
and so are nasdaq stock picks, as well as currency exchanges on the foreign
exchange market.

One currency can be used on the basis of comparison between currencies to


prove that the US dollar is the reserve currency - how about the Iranian
Persian Riyal. This currency is used by the bank for international settlements
to destroy all currencies and all trading and business throuhgout the market
as a total, because even that currency cannot be the basis of exchange to
obtain and sell products and services for the masses.

The market is ELIMINATED.

Volume sales do not mean anything. They are an illusion, the market is built
on buyers and sellers consecutively in any finite set. multiple sellers in the
buyer and seller switch are extraneous because they are not selling to each
other at that POSITION and MOMENT in time. Weaker buyers are the cancer
that destroy the market, and they line up no MATTER what. Weaker buyers
mean the end for the market because Higher Buyer companies buy out
weaker sellers down the slope, which leads to a domino effect
instantaneously. The market dies because the illusion of the market is that all
these companies are able to TRANSACT with each other. Usurpation of sales
and money through selling to smaller companies, means that the market dies
with One seller and one lower buyer in a domino effect. All weaker buyers die
off as nodes and cell blocks that are cancerous. The market dies off. The
market is base on B and S, any other conglomeration and aggregation of
Sellers kills the market. Buyers by themselves lining up mean nothing no
matter how weak or strong, and all are weak in the end. But weaker buyers
lining up is the real culprit to the market, down the slope in terms of PRICE
tag for products being sold. That is why the market is based on Bull shit. B
and S.

Now what you must realize is that the market is built on price. If the market is
based on price tag, you might have one business that is worth 3 dollars, and
one that has 6 dollars to BUY. That means that the buyer business buys the 3
dollar businesses product meaning that the buyer business now has 3 dollars
to spend. The seller business made 3 dollars. The buyer business will now sell
a product for 4 dollars, in order to overcome loss of input cost. This means
that The seller business originally that is now a buyer business cannot afford
the new seller businesses product without losing ALL profit of 3 dollars and
some savings. So it must seek a weaker seller selling for 2 dollars. So this is
how new companies aggregate. That business who is selling for 4 dollars now
needs a HIGHER buyer business buying at least 4 dollars in assets. So this is
how the cascade creates NEW companies in real time. AS between each other
there is a log jam and lock down based on price tag. The reality is that
splitting prices into bits and pieces means nothing based on price tag, it
implies FUTURE loss that is inevitable based on input costs. IF you don't make
your bills, you are bankrupt. Those bills will always linger over the market,
and the only way out is relativized price reduction but it will always lead to a
domino effect requiring newer companies based on PROBABLISTIC CHOICE to
find and fetch new companies. New companies are required because
companies do not buy from the company they sell to. You need a whole new
set.

FINITE SETS always die, due to the Bull shit mechanism, Buyer higher and
seller lower down the slope cascade based on price tag and amount willing to
spend. Any aggregating sellers of any gradient of price tag or buyers means
nothing, due to the position aggregation and conglomeration. Weaker buyers
and weak links die off and that means if even if there is just one weak link left
off, the whole system dies off. The illusion of multiple transactions or volume
sales for one company will not change that --- volume sales are a lie.
Everything is based on one unitary transaction, one fell swoop loss.

Relativize price reduction to deal with not affording input costs means that
the market is based on arbitrary prices of just passing money around, but 2
companies stuck in a bilateral choice occlusion, wherein they run away from
just doing business with each other, leads the market to expand to more and
more companies, and the finite set is broken. Meanwhile profit is not possible
because profit gradients are not possible....differentiation in price is not
possible, it simple cannot work in the market. IT means constant LOSS and
use of EXTERNAL inflationary savings. Because of that, the market is a dead
end from the VERY BEGINNING. Nothing will change that.

Supply and demand is ruined based on this process. It simply makes no


difference because MEDIUM of exchange does not work, money does not
work. The fact is that, logistical concertion of prices changes in the market
which is a finite set does not work, because it is tautologically, logistically
impossible for all companies to just change their prices lower infinitely due to
not recouping the amount necessary to overcome losses of input cost
disbursements. Profit is killed. Infinite price reduction means no possibility of
profit.

Supply and demand is relative in the sense that a business that is not
necessarily highly asseted can usurp money and loans from other companies,
and the domino effect can work in either way, as discussed, left or rightward
down the slope depending on relativized individualized loans and prices. So it
really does not matter what your products cost or how good your products
are (how high in demand they are relative to supply of money). Supply and
demand is bull shit.

Remember that the domino effect entails businesses and companies doing
business as between each other, and consumer purchases are extraneous
although illusory and might seem as if they might affect the result to allow
businesses in the Buy and Sale slope to subsist, but none will subsist as
between each other. Those consumer purchases are an illusion, and involve
fraud. Those people would have money that is extraneous to the primary,
secondary, and tertiary stock markets due to the black hole of input costs.
They would have to be filled with inflationary stolen dollars extraneous to
working (FRAUDULENT INFLATIONARY SAVINGS), to nourish businesses while
geographically spanning the whole market and nation(s). That is already
absurd, it would mean that 100 percent of the market would have to be
retired, while that would make absolutely no sense when given the current
data and quotidiian common sense.

High market prices ostensibly covering the whole market can never work as
between businesses down the slope. The reason why is because those high
market prices cannot cover the whole market, and even if they did they
would not be nourished as between businesses. That money would have to
be fraudulent money purchased by consumers who are making money
outside of working, retirement pension plans, etc. A complete cabal. The
input costs differentials in the market in severable and in aggregate prove
that companies cannot cover the cost of the higher market priced business.
That price is going to have to be covered just between 2 businesses, using
SAVINGS extraneous even to profits (in addition to profits). That cannot occur
holistically in the market without the use of fraudulent savings money that
has no EXPLANATION and is cupid, serves only for greed. So high market
prices cannot be recovered due to a schism in the market wherein input costs
will not cover those high market prices because what they recieve in cash is
TOO low to cover individually these high market prices and also as a group.
The group aspect arrives in terms of geography, so God has established a
situation wherein mathematical truths are proven through geographical
aspects as well in terms of human SCENARIOS on EARTH. Game theory is
destroyed - ideas of chance are destroyed. This whole mass of businesses
that are making so little in terms of price tag, can possibly theoretically cover
the high market price in some BIGGER aggregate cluster, of a few companies,
but those few companies cannot cover the huge mass of tiny priced
companies, based on being in such a sparse amount. It would not be possible
on a transactional regular basis throughout the market.

Huge market prices in a huge AMOUNT compounded throughout the market


in terms of businesses can cover a small amount of businesses with lower
market prices, but if there is any differential gradient in the market prices
then that would have to be covered by money extraneous to the market in
terms of inflationary savings. So all those huge market prices would
essentially have to be 100 percent equal throughout the market, as one unit
price for every business for products and services. One unit item.

Everyone having the same input costs is the RULE, differentials gradients in
prices never works, as we discussed due to the domino effect. The domino
effect will destroy any chance of the market ever working as a total. Healthy
transactions as between businesses are not possible due to the buyer and
seller switch off that leads to total loss when actual transactions occur,
meaning half sellers and half buyers in the market, requiring new companies
to accrue in real time after that ONE unitary transaction from the Buyer Seller
(B.S.) Slope Cascade. Differentials higher in the market are required with
transactions compounding next to each other, as a result of accruing GAINS
and profits, instead of total losses and waste of time by achieving the same
amount as you spent. The constancy of PROFIT is embedded in transactions,
to Achieve HIGHER, otherwise there is no point. It's an all or nothing system,
and when you try to do the right thing by achieving capitalist profit, you
achieve nothing but TOTAL LOSS of profit + usage of savings. So it's a
complete travesty for the businesses as a whole. Competition means one
business cannot cover the other business in the exchange, after a buyer
seller switch off. IF a buyer company buys from a Seller Company and raises
their market price by ANY accretion, much less a High one, the now BUYER
company who was formerly a seller cannot afford.

The domino effect prevails, secondary or tertiary transactions are an illusion.


Buyers and sellers LOWER are the rule, as amongst companies. And that
means that the market cannot prevail. That is how the slope cascade works.

What you MUST realize is that the implication of consumer purchases all the
time is that all the prices are the same all the time, infinitely with infinite
DOLLARS going nowhere, just a one to one ratio of input costs for subsequent
returns. Meanwhile, that will never actually occur, yet it is all you can have.
There is no profit gradients, no schisms wherein prices rise like yeast - so
everyone essentially has the same amount of money. That makes money
worthless, as discussed. Money only works wherein somebody has more
money than another - it's about SLAVERY And insurrection. It's about
domination and hegemony at someone elses LOSS and expense. The less
someone else has, the more I HAVE. That is the only way money works. That
is a supply and demand mechanism within the NUMERICAL nature of money
in terms of mathematics. Money is a numerical system.

The implication is that the market has to be fully funded infinitely with infintie
dollars, covering every business with EVERY transaction, all the time with the
SAME amount for price tags. That is the only way it would ever work is the
same ANALOGOUS situation of having infinite businesses and market
participants in an infinite cascade slope that never works, a Blue screen of
death.

Infinite loans and infinite dollars going nowhere, yet we know there is a
MARKET DISEQUILIBRIUM (read my first book in 2013 titled market
disequilibrium) LOSS. Money is lost when you disburse cash and change to
employees - you never get any of that back you only LOSE money.
Competition doesn't work in the buyer seller strata as amongst BUSINESSES.
Transactions as amongst businesses leads to a thin red line that prevents
market transactions with consumers.

Note that within the numerical system there is a supply and demand
mechanism wherein 5 dollars DEMANDS 6 dollars, 6 dollars has one extra
dollar than 5. That means that 6 is in lower supply and higher demand
RELATIVE to 5 because it has that extra unit of 1 that 5 doesn't have. That
means number beget higher and higher numbers, infinitely upward. And
infinity means preclusion, occlusion, obstruction and never working in the real
world. Especially in the realm of medium of exchange wherein competition is
the substratum and basis for transactions.

Note that for companies that want to do healthy business outside the
periphery of the aggregate FRAUD pool that doesn't work and is actually
controlled by the government. Those minority companies would have to
literally live with their parents and cannot afford overhead and energy/labor
costs of business using only past sales to fund current input costs. New
money has to fund bills on a constant basis, any other constancy wherein
PAST sales always cover input costs of business and bills at HOME (As
discussed), means that the company owner must be retired. There is no
mathematical point in doing business, the sales are too high. Penny theories
wherein input costs are so low relative to sales, no matter how high demand
money is, are not practical and do not work in a healthy market. Input costs
must be relational to market price, that is the simple fact and the reality is
the CONTRARY scenario means constant inflationary use of savings to run
business and house costs to then recoup with sales AFTERWARDS (a priori).
That is not realistic and means SAVINGS, implying Bankruptcy or RETIREMENt
for the business. Savings on a regular basis to run a business means
bankruptcy.

The savings problem lies in loss of money - wherein rainy day money is used
which means the company should go bankrupt and will not thrive. That is the
DILEMNA and the gun to the head of the business owner. That weak link and
weak buyer will cause a domino effect genocide for the whole market and
that is that. A total holocaust.

The whole system rests on a thin red line of the companies that transact as
amongst each other. The reason is because the end result will always be half
weaker buyers vs. half higher sellers, so companies DIE off and cannot buy
from another business. All businenesses need to buy from other businesses,
they cannot buy from consumers, as discussed above. Massive consumer
purchases will not change the effect of the transactions of the FOUNDATION
of the market which is the businesses transacting as amongst each other.
Business owners buying from other businesses, the competition therewith,
destroys the market at its base. That is a domino effect that Eliminates the
market. The buyer and seller switch means the market dies off by the skin of
its teeth, separating consumption from production. Consumption is an illusion
in regards to maintaining BUSINESS in terms of medium of exchange and
profit. Bull shit kills the market in one switch, with one weak Buyer and
one weaker seller, respectively down the slope lighting the fuse to
destroy the remnants of the market (See Chart).

That is the main point you must see down ANY slope in any cascade
severable or aggregate in any market (severable and aggregate is
an illusion, everything occurs according to the same failed principle
in the money market) - You will see a Higher buyer and lower seller
that do the last transaction to kill the whole cascade and slope. In
any national system.

Now we must discuss quintiles and salaries in regards to the scope of the
whole market. IF the median salary for the whole market is 53,000 when
adjusted for inflation, and the lower quintiles of salaries in the population are
making less than THAT when adjusted for inflation, it is not possible for
salaries to be higher than 53,000 when adjusted for inflation upward and
onward. That is the rule in this economic system as discussed in
Premeditated inflation my treatise in 2013. 50 percent of the market on the
lower half of salaries cannot afford to pay for products to mete out salaries or
net profits that are 50 percent higher when ADJUSTED for inflation, at best
they will be lower and at maximum will be the SAME in one unitary salary for
all. Most likely it will be less than the lower half even, because not everyone
spends all the money they make every year (some use that money for
savings). So it is simply not possible. The max these rich guys could ever get
if people spend everything except their last pay check is the same amount I
got. IF you were to disperse that in terms of quintiles the same as the lower
half, then meting out those prices will AT MAXIMUM achieve the same amount
on the lower half. You would have 100 percentile, 90 percentile, 80 percentile,
70th percentile, 60th percentile, 50th, 40th percentile, 30th percentile, 20th
percentile, 10th percentile etc. That would presumably be based simply on
salary amounts that grow HIGHER in some fashion when doing a survey.
Other than that quintiles mean nothing. Those are just amounts calculated
relative to different people obtaining currency and salaries. Salaries going
higher when half are making so low, when ADJUSTED FOR INFLATION - that is,
salaries that are nominally higher and also higher when adjusted for the
Consumer Price Index are not possible using these lower salaried employees
in the scope of the market. The salaries on the "higher" end should actually
be lower in a Market Disequilibrium, because people mete out less money
than they make at any one time. PEople spend less money than they make in
any one pay check at any one time, so salaries in any Cross sectional or
aggregate holistical survey will show that the "richer" will be the poorer, the
salaried employees will be making more money than the rich profiteers and
producers.

The fact is that a one to one transfer, even if salaried employees are going at
the rate of inflation with their salaries from employers will never work - a one
to one transfer of input costs for prices of goods wherein running and
operating a business is pointless. That is actually going to be a loss, wherein
salaries are meted out, and the return is LESS to the employee than even the
salary which is only ONE portion of total input costs in the market price total.

That is full service proof of Market Disequilibrium, that is, TOTAL LOSS BASED
MARKET.

If the market were to try to have some people make above the rate of
inflation the percentages should be totally different, 75 percent of the market
participants who are making salaries as employees or employers, (you can
see how employees and employers coalesce as people who simply make
money in this spectrum) - can make at or below the rate of inflation, and with
that money you can calculate so that only 20-25 percent or even LESS
businesses are making ABOVE the rate of inflation with HIGHER nominal
salaries. The two working in tandem require a smaller amount given these
HALF AND HALF figures presented on wikipedia and in other sites. You cannot
have half the market make ABOVE THE RATE OF INFLATION WITH HIGHER
WEALTH AND SALARIES vs. the other half making BELOW the rate of inflation
with lower nominal salaries. Nominal salaries work in tandem with rates of
inflation ADJUSTMENTS (real wealth). Real wealth and nominal wealth work
together. In the end they are the same thing- relativization of wealth through
comparisons of various parapleys of salaries and adjustments over the time
are meaningless. Higher nominal wealth = Higher Real Wealth. You cannot
have higher real wealth without higher nominal wealth. That is because
Inflation is required. In an aggregate sense that is the rule and so is the same
in a severable sense. Higher nominal wealth always works in 2's. One person
must have more nominal wealth than one other person to have more REAL
wealth. So Higher nominal wealth and higher real wealth are always tied
together, despite the FACT that inflation is also always required in the market
yet never achieves anything to make profit or money work.

Price fixing is the rule - the government controls all businesses and
companies and price fixing might allow for adjustments of inflation and
salaries but it will be controlled. The companies will not be affected by the
money inputted by sales in terms of maintaining business or companies.
There are no companies operating "healthily" to use money to exchange
goods. So salary adjustments relative to changes in prices could presume or
presuppose an adjustment for inflation using the CPI but the CPI is a bull shit
number I will expose to you, so price baskets and average mechanisms of
changes in prices are not accurate methods of inflation. Prices simply change
and salaries go higher, using government choices mediations and
arbitrations.

Fraud is presumed in this strata as well because the other half of the market,
the higher quintiles as discussed above - we are presuming the poor feed the
rich through CONSUMPTION by employees to producers. That should be the
case, but even if the rich had their own little clique or nich making money
only from each other, competition as between the rich companies would
mean company OWNERS and CEO's cannot maintain that level of nominal
wealth on the HIGHER 50 percent of the market, withtout fraudulent money
that is EXTERNAL to the market in terms of inflation and unaccountable.
Competition of loans between 2 or more companies kills the chance of that
ever happening - through the PAC man usurpation of loans through supply
and demand. Employees as we know, cannot afford business products and
services to maintain the businesses because they are only one portion of the
input cost through the BLACK HOLE OF INPUT COST GRADIENTS. That means
employees cannot meet those costs either, making ends meet. So in both
aspects, the PRICE LINE is screwed relative to salaries and net profits for
people to cover those costs in this HIGHER half, and also lower half as a
TOTAL Elimination of the market. A Megadeath of the economic market as a
TOTAL. There is a domino effect mathematically of the higher half of the
market, that would prevent RICH people as a SEVERABLE clique to promote
that higher side, without FRAUDULENT money.

FRAUD is the rule here, in all aspects for consumption to cover all these costs,
mean while the price line is destroyed, as between COMPANIES. Therefore we
now know the domino effect Eliminator of the market preventing money from
allowing for inflation to nourish business, means that finite companies are not
possible and are always broken to infinite at infinite speed, no matter what
the speed a business wants to USE their money - it will always be infinite
speed.

Fraud exists with infinite loans that are unaccountable and UNREPAYABLE, for
consumers, for the stock market which reaches prices and stock picks that
are higher than profits of businesses in the total of markets. Relativization of
lower stock picks through a disinflationary mechanism is complete bullshit, it
never works. There is a domino effect for stock market purchasers and
"profiteers" in the secondary market, the derivatives, futures, bonds, assets
and securities market, options, stocks etc. Which prevents the stock market
ever from flourishing as between either 2 people gambling or 5 billion people
gambling, etc. That is a total profit fraud.

Businesses would need to be funded by fraudulent money along with


consumers who are toe to toe with each and every businesses, so that those
businesses who are transactionally COVERED to maintain their businesses,
can cover other businesses. Meanwhile we know that domino effect will occur
because of competition between businesses will lead to the REQUISITE
necessity of rainy day savings that don't exist to operate the business input
cost expenditures, leading to bankruptcy for the whole market. Even with
money the price line is destroyed simply based on competition and bilateral
occlusion of choice between 2 businesses and more.

Fraudulent money in the system is required as a result of the black hole of


input costs, we need all this excess money to cover the system yet it will not
work from a consumption standpoint. Simply funding businesses is an illusion
that is not geographically possible. Even with consumers everywhere with all
this money that is external to the market, fraudulently procured - all this
greed based constant transactional money whether coming from business
owners or consumers, won't make a difference. The fact is that each and
every SINGLE business needs external consumers to cover them
geographically this would apply for every business individually. That means
that transactionally money must come from consumers not just business
owners. That money must be external to the 1 producer, it must appear out
of nowhere BECAUSE of the black hole of input costs relative to one unit item
price. Only labor is covered by the paycheck SALARY - the rest of the costs of
materials and equipments/energy is not covered by this individual business
expenditure. That means that these fraudulent consumers have to be
everywhere with all this extra money, fraudulently procured, that they cannot
get from the business owner PAYROLL. They are richer than the business,
they are making ABOVE the rate of inflation and the end result is that the
market will not work. Why? because of PRICE LINE DECLIVITY competition
between businesses.
Single price for consumption by consumers of individual businesses seems to
be a panacea for a FRAUDULENT market due to the black hole of input costs.
However, that is specious and fallacious, in fact facetious. The fact of the
matter is that the price line competitional schism between Sellers and
buyers, which boils own to one Seller and one buyer that make nothing - a
WEAKEST link buyer with no where to go....So in fact Bs turns to Sb - a Son of
a Bitch. Single businesses cannot subsist off of consumers who have money -
the market dies off in L fasion because the businesses transacting as
between each other leads to half weaker buyers in ANY finite set in the
aggregate or severable no matter what, requiring new companies. It will
always be severable anyway geographically - and never connecte in a single
line because that woul imply a waiting game and no one transacted. Any
finite set requires a doubling up of companies no matter what. Individual
companies might try to get what they want from consumers individually, as
per Fraud for each company as employees purchase goods for each company
throughout the geographic span of the system - but that will be to no avail
because half of the companies will be buyers in the switch off due to the
nature of the finite set even between 2 companies or as a whole. Connecting
severable cascades just leads to a Higher Seller and weaker buyer NO
MATTER WHAT. That is the rule of the market - Buyer higher company, and
weaker seller. So that means no possibility of transacting. It's over. New
companies are required in the finite set, no matter what, volume sales are an
illusion that will always require either doubling of the market or new
companies in REAL time appearing out of thin air - whether there is a black
market or otherwise. More transactions means more loss, so that means
weaker sellers must arrive to cover purchases, or higher buyers must arrive
to cover sales. Consumers cannot make up the difference. Real time
accretions are implied by volume sales as discussed, and that is not possible -
new companies arriving out of thin air.

Bullshit is the rule. Finite sets always die immediately when transacting as
amongst each other. There is no time loop. Anything else would imply a
waiting game wherein companies wait for other companies throughout the
market to transact, but that is not possible because business would hault for
weeks at a time while only a few companies transact. Companies must
ALWAYS buy from OTHER companies not other people. This means that
businesses add on new businesses in real time, or are required to HAVE new
businesses appear in real time, as they trasnact through the buyer and
purchase schematic. But this will not change the reality that this is an illusion
because in ANY cascade there is always Buyers higher and sellers lower in
terms of profit and unit price gradient, so the whole thing gets Eliminated in
one fell swoop based on transactions just between 2 businesses. The slope is
destroyed NO matter what, downward to Elimination and Megadeath. The
cascade must be seen beyond these machinations and chicaneries -
mannered artifices to make it WORK - the system will never work in a
medium of exchange based monetary economy - because uncovering the
slope reveals that the finite set will always have Buyers higher and Sellers
lower and that cuts through the WHOLE system as a LIMITER - a FLATLINE of
the market that not only goes to 0, it goes to negative. IT is a line that cuts
through the sand and dust of a the holy grail, the Gathas, the Cyrus Cylinder
-the Behistun inscription of Dariush Shahanshah, Darius The Great - revealing
that the system does not work through those illusions and fogs. The slope
FAILS. Slope Day, since I'm a Cornell Law University Ivy League Graduate.
There is a monetary value to the Buyer and seller that is downward, those
respective entities. The numericality of it is that the prices go downwards,
and switch offs otherwise with aggregating sellers and buyers makes no
difference to the outcome - because that downward declivitiy destroys the
market no matter what in a domino effect, a fuse that is light to kill the
market in an instant of unitary transactions - not secondary or tertiary. Any
other transaction is an illusion. New companies are required in ONE TOTAL
cascade. That lower slope price line means that HIgher buyer companies buy
from affordable sellers, and weaker buyers or HIgher sellers mean nothing to
the CASCADE. That is the truth, it is a DOWWARD purchasing slope.
Purchasing CONSUMER SOCIETY is the rule, not producer sales or business
sales. That is final that is how the market works.

The bailout crisis was a sham from day one. That was a big loans crisis that
never happened, beecause loans are not possible. Business loans are not
possible - neither are mortgage loans. No one takes out loans. Money is not
even used by the majority of society. Fraudulent consumer loans are not
possible. There is only a minority of people in America who are actually using
salaries, and medium of exchange. Money is not used in this system at all
except by a minority of people who are being oppresse and discriminated.

Loans for companies that failed due to the MBA's, or mortgage backed assets
is a complete scam due to raising interest rates. The austrian boom and bust
cycle is a scam. This is all a bust, no boom ever occurs in the monetary
system an it has to do with money not working an inflation and profit not
working in the system. The fact is that interest rates rising to kill the stock
market investments is not possible - that is a specious illusion. Bank loans
being called back and foreclosures is a scam and never happens either. The
reality is that the market dies from the inception, due to competition killing
the whole market in an all or nothing 0 sum game. It is a zero flatline based
system.

The securities fraud also made no sense because all a person can get back
from the pooled assets (which is bull shit to begin with and stupid) is the
amount of amortized payments, so those assets cannot get higher unless
there is an internal supply and demand scam making the actual ASSET higher
and higher to get just payments back in terms of loan payments on a monthly
basis from sub prime mortgagers. So assets can never GO higher in
secondary markets arbitrarily through supply and demand.

Prices of stocks can never go higher than the actual price or profit net worth
of a company. That would make no sense. Using supply and demand in the
secondary market to do that is not possible, because how can you mete out
stocks that are worth more than the total cost of your company even with
dividend payments which are just payments per one unit stock to a purchaser
who OWNS a share of the company as a largesse for owning a share of the
company and a return for investment (presumably with interest). Stocks that
are worth HIGHER in terms of market demand than the companies worth are
not possible. Stock markets require inflation to make the market even work
as per consumers who own stocks because there is a black hole in input costs
that requires fraud in the market and all the reasons mentioned regarding the
failure of the price line through competition. Meanwhile the whole market in
terms of geographic span requires inflationary money throughout the whole
system to buttress businesses and it ends up going nowhere. So the stock
market would require inflationary money to even make the system work, and
it will go nowhere no matter what. That inflationary money is external to any
salary or profits by businesses, and only a few people could even possibly
procure that illegal money. A fraudulent system even in one percentage or
iota, means the whole thing is corrupted and cannot work as if it is a
computer that has a virus or is damaged totally. One butterfly effect kills the
whole market. Anyway so much money from stocks means too many people
are rich and would have to be retired geographically spannign the whole
market to provide that inflationary SAVINGS based transactional money to
help companies from going bankrupt. Competition as between businesses in
the foundation of the market kills it (the Price Elimination line kills the
market) no matter what. Supply and demand cannot make the prices of
stocks higher than the actual profits of a business, even passing around the
stocks will lead to the same result, raising prices in the secondary market to
simply own a Company in aggregate leading to a higher amount than the
profits of the company is not possible. Futures contracts are not possible,
they are just contracts between companies that lead to failure and domino
effect bankruptcy, as well as contracts between wannabe yuppies.

A future contract means that money is provided to another party in a contract


that can either lead to a loss, in terms of prices going higher for the ASSET
that is meant to be returned to the purchaser, for the person who must
purchase it (he/she must use money as savings to buy that asset), or the
asset is reduced in price meaning that the person who purchased it lost
money, they spent more money then the actual asset. That is a gain for the
one who must buy the asset for the original purchaser, because he/she gets
to pocket the excess money. The fact is that the whole market will die in the 2
by 2 process, because assets require savings to buy as between 2 companies
or parties, and that will lead to a domino effect for the whole market, of
people purchasing stocks. Bilateral choice occlusion and the Buyer and seller
blockade will ruin the profit between people purchasing assets and stocks,
meaning the cascade is destroyed for people purchasing stocks.

The market as we have discussed is simply not finite, beecause of many


factors. The main factor is that 2 parties, as in companies, do not purchase
and sell to each other on a constant basis. As you know the domino effect
leads to half weaker buyers in the market, that requires at least HALF of an
addition of businesses for the next transaction in the BS spectrum down the
cascade slope. So the two coalesce, mathematics of profit (input cost vs.
market price transactions) and probability choice between two companies as
in humans who don't want to play hot potato between businesses - this leads
to new companies being required in real time to break the finite spectrum. So
returning to a finite set of businesses is not possible for consumers or
business consumers (business owners buying...they are also consumers as
this is a consumer system and consumer society, not a proucer and consumer
based society) - but either way prices would decline infinitely if that were the
case making all money equal for all market participants. All cash would be
equivalent and medium of exchange would not work, as we discussed since
profit gradients downward cannot reach higher gradients upward as money is
infinitely reduced to tiny amounts. Fractions of pennies are not even
distributed by the united states treasury department in terms of coinage.
Money going downward relative to another person means that it is not
possible to afford upward the cost of the other company, to produce a profit.
How can I cover in aggregate the cost of one company or more companies
that have a higher amount, as prices are designed to infinitely reduce. Each
company in the spectrum needs a whole new set for each company, on a one
to one level, yet that will lead to the same problem if the system is finite of
price decline. It is a constant system, going upward with prices or keeping
prices regular requires MORE market participants in the finite set - which is
not possible and leads to an infinite freeze and is not possible because so
MANY have to appear in real time out of nowhere - 30 million businessese
require 30 million more immediately for the next transaction - that is NOT
possible. Companies are doubled in the milieu without physical logistical
possibilities to enact such a monetary based system. Meanwhile - returning
hypothetically to the companies is going to lead to price decline infinitely,
because people always purchase less than what they just made. People
always buy less than what they just procured - meaning the prices in
severable and aggregate decline, and returning to the same business in this
fashion means that business will be making less than what it made before
because it is relying on YOU, and that produces a different profit margin
meaning a different business is there now, even by one penny that would be
the case. Businesses just make less and less infinitely down the slope, in any
finite set up. Probability choice prevents price decline anyway, besides the
fact that that set up defeats profit and is based on savings loss, and will
always require infinite POSITIVE inflation +, meaning money has to be
inputted you cannot rely on a 0 percent inflation set up wherein money just
DECLINES infinitely with no profit differentials. So returning to businesses just
makes no cents. Now you must see how probability choice works within the
mathematical realm, as a GOD FORCE - an AHURA MAZDA force - to promote
that the market must GROW in real time to the point where it is not humanly
and physically possible to infinitely make those businesses, and the only way
transactions will work to prevent a domino effect is if it simply never works. A
TOTAL infinite, infinite speed growth of the market that leads to a Blue Screen
of death for the whole market. Finite sets are always broken to infinite, and
always are corrupted virally internally, preventing money from ever working
both due to monetary concerns wherein profit no longer exists and making
money above 0 dollars or currency denominations is not possible (ground
zero flatline) and also due to human choice requiring more and more
companies in real time - A coalescence of mathematics/economics/ and
human choice that is immutable and a probablistic 100 percent certainty.
Bilateral business sales and purchases always means infinite loss due to
market disequilibrium and the nature of inflationary profit.

0 percent inflation is not possible. 0 percent inflation is toted often by arm


chair fake economists who stole my work, and others who promote that 0
percent inflation means that the value of currency is high because the
demand of each unit is higher relative to the supply. Higher supply of
currency makes one unit of that currency less in demand (higher supply
versus lower demand). This means that prices will not be so high on a
constant basis to eat away at salaries given by employers or for employes in
terms of net profits and gross profits. What this implies is that there is a
possibility wherein prices do not have to change, and money can stay within
a pool in the money supply (m1, and m2) without input by the central bank
(federal reserve, ECB, World Bank, IMF etc.). That is not possible because that
implies a deflation. No inflation always means deflation. 0 percent inflation
always means loss, and will never work, savings will be used in REVERSE to
make up for that and that will not work because that will be an infinite
process. If there is a calibration of price for the whole market it will only go
down and return to the same spot with the inclusion of new businesses in real
time. The only other way in a finite system is constant price decline, due to
the half weaker buyers in the spectrum split and schism. Probability choice
will beget new businesses, in terms of bilateral occlusion between two
companies.
Every company has another company it sells to and buys to, on a CONSTANT
basis. The regularity of doing business just between two companies is not
possible or probable, and will also lead to loss. This means that if there are 6
companies, each company sells to another company, and buys to another
company. That is a total of 12 companies for each of the original 6
companies, making a total of 18 companies. There is too much repetition for
that to be possible and that means finite sets based on this probability that is
a certainty in human choice are immutable. The fact is that each company is
selling and buying to another company, which breaks the finite set (2
companies per 1 company means that any aggregate finite set in the realm
of transactions) - no finite set is possible based on basic human choice. It is a
constant regular processs wherein companies go to other companies than the
ones they buy or sell to, locked in those 1 by 1 transactions they SPLIT OUT to
prevent loss and to buy different things. Each company buys and sells to a
New company, and on just a basis of doing that with 2 different ones ALONE
kills the finite set and makes it impossible to have a finite set of business
owners that are actually working to keep the system afloat. Transactions are
unitary and primary, every business goes to one business AT A TIME, and that
splits off the market - as we discussed volume sales are an illusion for the
SAME REASON on the basis of profit gradients. Now you can see probability
choice much clearer and you can also ascertain how companies cannot
remain in a finite set just on the basis of 6 or 4 companies, analogizing that
process of 1 by 1, 2 by 2 in aggregate unitary transactions throughout the
market.

The fact is that salaried employees or people pretending to work and with no
job that get FREEBIES like this market is set up...sinecures, they can just hop
into the massive parapley and hodgepodge of companies in the system. But
in reality that is what is occurring in this current market.

Next we will discuss a minority of salaried employees. We now know business


is not possible unless CGI's are used for business owners who are not actually
corresponding to an actual person who has to worry about probability choice.
People hopping into companies to buy does not involve probabilities between
two people when the CGI's operating or working for companies are actually
not real people. So that is what is happening, and the majority or super
majority of americans are not working and are pretending to work.

The fact is the government controls all businesses in a price fixed system for
people who have to use money. The money used is for a minority who is
being oppressed in an apartheid and shcakled without even knowing they are
being shackled, and that will be fully exposed and the perpetrators castigated
to the full extent of federal, state, and international laws. This is a massive
criminal fraud and it is being exposed.
Also note that if the system were fraudulent it would be poorer businesses
obtaining free money in the weaker buyer mechanism, to thwart price
reduction through fraud and inflation. That means the poorer would be
implicated in a massive fraud - local stupid stores with liquor owners or
chinese restaurants and dunkin donuts/gas stations/ or carribean african
spas. These companies would be the ones getting free inflationary dollars
from the government, and that would implicate loss extraneous to sales on a
CONSTANT basis. It is either one or the other, and it still will not work in
aggregate due to the bilateral choice mechanism to have these infintie
dollars in a non profit or pseudo profit system with poorer businesses making
free money more than the rich, using that external to profits on a constant
basis means they are BANKRUPTED and shouldn't even be working.
CONSTANT transactional basis is the key and rule, and will not be thwarted or
obfuscated by stupid propagandists or "pedants" who are going to be CGI.

The system must span out.

Look what we have to understand is that Higher sellers and weaker buyers in
half and half fashion in the system means that weaker buyers could possibly
get funded fraudulently by fraudulent dollars but that means the poorer
businesses are getting money. That is absurd, and then they would constantly
buy out richer companies who are selling in the switcheroo. The problem we
have here is that this means for poorer companies, price is destroyed by
savings external to the actual process of commerce, which is inherently
fraudulent and bespeaks that the system of buyer companies do not need to
actually transact or work as company owners. Savings Eliminates the price,
as bespoken by the formula listed above: Savings = P which is 2 times the
actual price (an extra amount of the price is needed to satisfy every
transaction in order to cover input costs). The price is never enough. That of
course requires infinite dollars ON top of that amount, meaning it is pointless
because price dies and businesses die.

Now what you have to realize is that this is still theoretically possible, but it's
also possible to go the opposite direction of lowering price without having
that fraud, for those companies that do not engage in that fraud. They would
have to reduce their price but that would lead to the same problem in the
opposite direction of having input costs normalized to market price value,
wherein no profit is made due to infinite price reduction. All amounts of
salaries and profits are equal. That kills the point of doing business since
everyone is equally wealthy.

Going back upwards with fraudulent money back and forth back and forth
means that there is no gain in money, in this trajectory. It leads to zilch gains
and just passing around money in a specious system. A calibration or
vicissitude frequency that achieves nothing...a quantum around a flatline
ground 0 of zero profit, actually TOTAL LOSS. Constancy of deflation or
reverse inflation of prices reducing withing the finite or constant fraudulent
dollars added on to poorer businesses or even richer business (higher sellers
in the domino effect) really leads to a system wherein the only other result
would be this back and forth going upward (fraud with positive inflation) or
reduction in price in a concerted logistically impossible manner, which would
achieve nothing. IT just wouldn't work. Losing money and then gaining back
to where you were in relativized fashion, really achieves nothing. It seems
possible, but it doesn't work.

Bilateral choice is the real issue we have to tackle now. First consider that
volume sales are an illusion. The slope cascade is really just a matter of one
unitary transaction as per 2 businesses. Any multiple transactions means new
businesses must appear that are not there, in REAL time, in any set or
severable group of cascades. It means that also there is a waiting game for
other companies, who should already be transacting during the PENUMBRA of
time wherein companies are working and operating during business hours to
achieve sales...You cannot wait for sales for days or even hours at a time.
Waiting for transactions is not possible, but even if it were to happen, which is
what volume sales presuppose (waiting), you would achieve the same result
wherein companies that are in the finite total in the market spectrum, will
have to break out to infinite. Multiple transactions for one or more companies
does imply waiting in the sense that some companies are not transacting
with other companies, but in the end the result is the same. Companies
switch off from buyers and sellers, alternating between both, and the domino
effect takes hold. A unitary line within the transactions of the whole finite set
between Buyers and Sellers DOWN the slope will achieve the same
immutable result of a requirement of DOUBLING the finite set. Multiple
transactions never occur, it just means that companies that are NOT EVEN
there are going to be doing business. That is the actual conclusion. The
reason is because companies have to transact with each other on a one to
one level. Each company doing that achieves a probablistic result that breaks
the finite, no matter WHAT. if that doesn't happen it means the company does
not exist or is not actually doing business within that penumbra of time but
when they do the same will happen, and the finite cascade will split out to
more than there really are (more companies will need to arrive). Probability
begets that result due to choice in business owners and employees seeking
new companies to buy from. Waiting game implies that those businesses that
are waiting to transact with one other business should have already been
transacting with other businesses in some other cascade geographically, or
simply another company.

The fact is the probability must be considered now - since we dealt with the
buyer and seller mathematical slope mechanism, wherein multiple
transactions might occur, requiring in real time new companies to show up,
which is absurd because in the end all you get is a doubling of the whole
finite set at best. That is why volume sales never happen macroeconomically
or microeconomically. The maximum limiter is that companies must spread
out through the profit gradient to double what the finite market is.

The fact is that Buyers and sellers that add on due to volume selling are an
illusion. The Sellers might add on higher on the slope, and weaker buyers
might show up down the cascade adding on. But the illusion that must be
uncovered is Higher seller and weaker buyer half and half slope that is the
OCCLUSION and ELIMINATION of the market finite null set. It is an empty set.

Prices can reduce infinitely but they must also be RAISED infinitely if
fraudulent money is addedd on for weaker buyer companies and also sellers.
Those consumers buying from sellers are getting that money out of thin air,
no actual commerce is involved for any nation, or any system to provide that
money. Either way the ROOT of that money is fraud, and that is half of the
market right there. Meanwhile weaker buyer companies are involved in total
fraud obtaining money for free, and they are also contradictorily the
POOREST businesses. Those poorest businesses are funding RICH seller
companies. How does that make sense? That is a disequilibrium in the market
that just doesn't ever happen.

You have to also realize that no matter what, the buyers and sellers are
switching off, switching NUMERICAL price tag positions on the slope cascade.
Poor companies suddenly become wealthy companies and switch places. How
the hell does the poorest company suddenly become RICHER than even the
upper middle class, or wealthier company on the spectrum just by one switch
of a transaction? For ever other transaction in the domino effect? That is what
happens in the finite set. You go from the lowest percentile of 1 percent to the
50th percentile in salary just from being a seller, and meanwhile the 50th
percentile SELLER company becomes the first percentile buyer company ---
the weakest link. That is what competition does with money. It leads to a
major contradicition.

Now that is obviously based on common sense impossible, and implies


massive fraud. The fraud involved in supplying BOTH sellers and buyer
companies is 100 percent total fraud, an that means the market cannot
subsist in a finite set. The only way to get away from this seasaw of sellers
becoming buyers and back and forth, the poorest company being the Richest
and back and forth is to add more and more companies for every other set of
unitary transactions (the unitary transaction is the ONLY transaction in the
Buyer seller downward slope cascade). Adding more companies in real time
this way is impossible physically.
Theoretically it might seem that only one weak seller is needed for all these
small companies, who is selling multiple items bit by bit parceled out to
various buyers --- that could be possible but not in the real world. That would
imply a waiting gam and also LOG JAM...so many companies geographically
spanned out will have to go to just a few severable companies in one location
or even sparsely spread out in the country. That is not really probable. 0
percent probability or possibility based on a man power force of achieving
transactions that is thoroughly discussed with the geographic spannage of
fraud neeed with money and transactions.

So finite sets imply impossible untenable contradictions in the market. The


fact is also that in finite sets prices rise automatically. To prevent prices from
rising BOTH seller companies and buyer companies need to add on infintiely
for every transaction as per 2 companies and as for the whole. Businesses
aggregate and aggregate infinitely and we know that leads to total infinite,
which is impossible. The fact is that this is the only way to prevent RISING
prices step by step, which would be impossible to maintain, for salaried
employees based on supply and demand and also there being infinite market
participants would also tautologically be impossible to achieve. Prices thus
always are raised in a finite system wherein even just a few or DOUBLING of
the companies occurs as weaker buyers down the cascade. The constancy of
doing business with people -

Adding new buyers essentially means that the old buyers go out of business
and go bankrupt. They are replaced. That makes sense economically, they
have no one to buy from - nowhere to go. So that is essentially what it means
to ADD companies in the finite in this fashion. It is a supplantation not just a
doubling of businesses. Half the market theoretically in the worst case
scenario goes out of business. The only way to stop it is to add New Sellers
LOWER down on the cascade and new buyers Higher on the cascade. So that
is a way to PREVENT those bankruptcies from occurring on the cascade. But
that is not the goals of the market...this is a loss based factory.

The truth is that supplanting buyers and sellers TOTALLY will prevent constant
price increase using fraudulent dollars for companies that are weaker buyers
who can't afford transactionally in the thick black brown line, the cost of
higher seller companies upward on the slope.

That is not possible, as we know, in REAL time at infinite speed to have those
companies appear. What you must realize instead is that if the system
remains finite and only weaker buyer companies are supplanted and
replaced, prices will GO UP still, because Sellers remain the same. Finite sets
don't work because of this very reason. You cannot kill off higher Sellers up
the cascade, they are still viable companies but they can also DIE too. What
really needs to happen is buyers need to die off because they are not selling
anything to Consumers, they are just purchasing.

You can even have theoretically although not possible for the geographic
probablistic reasons cited, One Higher Buyer show up on the slope of the
cascade to cover the cost of the weaker sellers (B.S.). But that is not
probable, more would have to show up, and then in the switch off be
REPLACED to prevent higher prices or constant lowering of prices, thus killing
profit, which is impossible in real time at infinite speed. Either way, the switch
off in a finite set of companies through simple unitary transactions (the real
world), of companies switching from poorer companies to Rich companies in
one transaction just makes no fucking sense. That's why new companies
need to be added on all the time to prevent this glaring absurd contradiction
in the whole market.

Prices going down infinitely in reverse inflation is a savings based market


wherein prices are all equivalent and wealth is equivalent - essentially
communist currency based system but profit means nothing. That is not
probable and is NOT what you see in today's inflationary market. That turns
the market on its head and also totally kills the purpose of money. Even
making a dollar above 0 is profit, and you won't be seeing that here
mathematically and practically. Now what you must consider is that
probability choice has to come here to mitigate what is going on, and that is
how it is glaringly obvious that companies split from finite to infinite all the
time due to CHOICE factors of business owners and also employees
(producers and consumers respectively).

But first we are going to have to see why prices increase all the time as we
add simply replace one group of companies (buyers or sellers in the alternate
bilateral switch mechanism of purchasing and selling), instead of constantly
adding market participants infinitely in real time. As you know the seasaw is
going to happen of sellers being higher relative to buyers all the time and
then buyers being RICH sellers back and forth, and vice versa if the system
stays even remotely put. Businesses will die off in the domino effect because
they have no one to buy from because of the mechanistic shift of half higher
sellers and half weaker buyers, instead of half Higher buyers and half weaker
sellers (B.S.). So Son of a Bitch (S.B.) is the Eliminator of price in the market
in a savings hypothetical which will never occur. The fact is if you have static
buyers or even just one portion of the market which is always either buyers
or seller companies as distinct groups - means that that staticity will lead to
prices contantly getting higher and higher. Replacing buyers just means fraud
doesn't have to exist with extra money to cover sellers. The buyers replacing
will be higher buyer companies due to the erection of the business, so now
Buyer and seller slope is back. Fraud would be implicated in a finite set
without replacing or bringing in new companies, with inflationary dollars that
are external to transactions and is essentially money laundering and
embezzlement. But to prevent prices from constantly increasing infinitely
which is impossible for consumers - it would require infinite market
participants and businesses appearing in real time as a TOTAL infinite. That is
physically impossible.

The impossibility of the system is clear on all sides in a finite set. But now we
must see how the set is NEVER finite based on probablistic choice in the
buyer and seller transactions that occur. That involves permutations of
transactions.

Replacing Buyers who die off down the slope, with a higher buyer company
that shows up and supplants the buyer company that is weaker, is a ring
around the rosey spectrum that keeps prices stable. All that is need is buyers
need to be replaced, or even sellers with weaker or lower prices. This switch
off prevents PRICES from going up because you have a new buyer or seller to
mitigate the LOSS vortex of constantly raising prices as between two people,
to prevent loss for just one business of whole PROFIT and SAVINGS. So price
raising is a preventative measure that kills price. And it would happen in a
finite system without replacements in this fashion, these impossible real time
switch offs that imply businesses that are weaker buyers or even sellers who
are in LOW demand dying off like flies all the time, and new ones appearing in
an instant. That is the kind of infinity in the worst case scenario - proving
infinite can occur in many ways not just a whole sale increase of the market
by 2 (A doubling of the finite market). The reality is that just a few companies
CAN theoretically appear, but that would not be practical GEOGRAPHICALLY
and through time and space of the penumbra of time in transactions in a
days work or week, as thoroughly discussed. Business has to happen with
alacrity due to bills and costs. So many new companies would need to apper
in real time to prevent fraudulent moeny coming in for companies on all
sides, and prices going way up the roof. IT is simply impossible - a per
transaction constant increase in price to infinite levels due to a finite set.
Here is what we have to realize is that, the price either goes all the way up or
down, and that is a constant aspect that needs to be considered. And the fact
is that fraud is implicated on all sides at 100 percent total fraud for
consumers AND companies. meanwhile price dies in the process through
savings. The concept is really based on real time increases in companies,
which is not possible, but would also apply in finites through input costs being
A priori to sales to recoup those costs, meaning money has to be INPUTTED
into the system before recoupments of sales through profit (market price).
That makes market transactions de facto impossible. That system requires
savings before prices are meted out to recoup those savings used. That
defeats the purpose and compounds input costs relative to profit, making
profit margins impossible no matter what, and is also an ass backwards
process.
A new entity arriving prevents having to raise prices constantly with new
cash, instead of deflation, or otherwise fraudulent inflation raising prices
infinitely. Either way its a dead end.

I will explain this process: Let us say one business is selling an item for 6
dollars, and the other buyer company now raises the price to 7 dollars after
the purchase from the seller company. Now the seller company is a buyer
company. He cannot afford that other businesses materials, but if that buyer
company is replaced, then that 7 dollars can be affordable based on a loan or
sales however procured to have money. Now that this occurs, the seller
company becomes a buyer company with 7 dollars in market price. It can
mete out its profit margin requirements of 1 dollar (which is not even possible
because you need at least triple the input cost in total market price to make
actual profit, but I am using a simple example which is actually quite
facetious), And then buy from a new Seller that is replaced with 6 dollars
worth of market price to continue the same 7 dollar market price as a seller
switching from a buyer. In this way infinite constant replacement of buyers
and sellers leads to stabilization of price. Finite systems lead to constant
increase in price as discussed, because you are dealing in 2 by 2 lock downs
that prevent and eliminate the system from working. That is a mathematical
reality of finite systems, that's why in oroborus fashion companies have to
continue to add on, and add on to make such an infinite system, prices are
stabilized yet it's logistically impossible to implement such a system.

Meanwhile a back and forth of reduction of price and increase leads to an


equivocation that prevents any monetary gain.

Furthermore, Buyers switching price based roles on the cascade with higher
buyers now being a higher seller, yet making so much less just one
transaction before based on PRICE tag in a finite set. That is the consequence
of a finite system, or any system at all with competitive transactions with
mediums of exchange. This seasaw process whereing the weakest buyer
becomes a richer business than the highest buyer which is the next business
down the slope based on the final Buy and Sale switch transaction that kills
the whole market in one fell swoop - this process proves that this market is
simply not possible or practical. It just never happens, differentials are not
possible in these finite systems. This constant rotational flux proves that
money cannot work in a profit mechanism which is a system wherein sales
accrue and money is used as a medium to achieve and obtain goods and
services.

Now we can discuss probabilities of choice. You see choice is the issue when
it comes to 2 by 2 transactions aggregating in the market, so volume sales
are ancillary and specious. It's a fact that probabilities of doing business are
really based on one by one transactions, a relativized system wherein that is
the final deal. It's not multiple transactions, that is an illusion that once again
implies a waiting game (loss of business during the working hours in the
penumbra of time which is not possible due to the alacrity of costs and bills
for a business owner for both living and business expenses bifurcation
requirement); and also implies new companies arriving in real time. But yet
unitary transactions is the rule because those probabilities are immutable as
between actually operating companies. You have to understand that. So now
we can see that 6 companies selling and buying to 6 different companies
means that 12 companies are implicated in excess of the original 6 in the
finite. Now you can see that this is not possible because that means that 6
companies are doing business with themselves!!!!!!! This probability that is
immutable in this transactional process is that each business buys and sells
to a different business in the spectrum of transactions, from the one they are
currently buying or selling to. This prevents monetary loss in the profit
mechanism, due to using savings on top of loss of total market price profit to
due business with the other company in the bilateral occlusion - and also
prevents the back and forth selling or repo man aspect of buying the same
input cost from the same guy constantly. The constancy of that process is just
not possible, neither here on mars or anywhere else. That fact of the matter
is 2 companies alone cannot transact as amongst each other on any
regularity of transactions - so companies span out just on that basis. But
permutations within the finite line demonstrate an opposite effect in this
process. That is an illusion, permutations are an illusion. The truth is much
different when looking at it from a holistic perspective that takes into account
what is actually happening in that process of buying and selling to two
different companies per each individual company in the finite set.

There is a doubling of the finite set in total, yet what that implies is a
repetition within the internal actual physically there finite set. So there is a
coalescence. A simple doubling proving that the finite set, that is, each
individual business must transact business as amongst each other, with
themselves. That proves the market can never be a closed set finite. A null
set. The finite set is broken to infinite no matter what.

So simply based on the bilateral occlusion thoroughly discussed of human


choice by business owners, of 2 businesses breaking out to find new
companies, the whole finite splits. That's axiomatic on the basis of companies
always traveling to a new company. Everyone goes to a new company...it
might not be a regular thing, but this schematic proves that this process is
accelerated on a constant basis. The regularity of a lock down means
stupidity --- hot potato loss of cash between two companies stuck together
like glue, defeating human basic instinct choice. Ahura Mazda unites choice
with mathematical price based logic.

75 percent of businesses according to the current survey are without


employees, under the title of small business associations (SBA's). That is not
possible and a lie. Even basic stores or partnerships in society have at least a
secretary.

According to forbes magazine, the median salary for small businesses (those
that have less than 500 employees meanwhile are considered small
businesses...wow), is 40,000 dollars a year. That's not a kind of salary a
business owner can ever have. That is impossible, business owners need to
have profits that are minimum of 100-200,000 dollars a year. 40,000 dollars a
year is the salary of an entry level employee, considered a paralegal. This is
the data solemnly and stolidly presented by the erudite scholars of forbes
magazine and their citations...the premier economics magazine in the planet.
Let's show you the link.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonnazar/2013/09/09/16-surprising-statistics-
about-small-businesses/#4c4b081a5ec8

Now contradictorily look at this article from the same baloney magazine toilet
paper:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/vanessaloder/2015/04/24/75-of-companies-
struggle-with-overwhelmed-employees-here-are-three-tips-to-
cope/#395ca78012e8

This is only a year before the previous article I mentioned, and now it says 75
percent of companies in america, wherever, struggle with overwhelmed
employees. Yet the majority of american businesses are SBA's there is no
doubt (citation), and 75 percent of them have 0 employees. Okay...so
something is majorly contradictory and stupid about this magazine and these
statistics. Well, it's just random numbers exemplifying a fraud. So vanessa
loder is definitely going to get a good load out of this one. Jason mraz above
is just an idiot and pretending to be smart.

Look this is an inflationary system and deflation can never exist, new
transactional money always has to pour in on a constant basis, to nourish
paychecks otherwise the company goes bankrupt and is using savings to
make the business function. Taking money out of the system is not possible,
it only haults transactions whether there is positive injected fraudulent
unrepayable inflation, or its a reverse savings based inflation that kills price
either way using both of those systems. Deflation or removal of money is
antithetical to anything concerning money. 0 chance, not a chance in hell. So
all this talk of raised interest rates to kill the market such as with the sub
prime mortgage crisis or whatever else shit they say about dot com bubble
ass from sisqo's mom in the thong song videos - that never happens. That's a
fiction of a fraudulent commercial tabloid market. Easily mathematical and
quantitatively provable, through real economics.
Deflation is a hypothetical. If money is taken out hypothetically, because this
is a hypothetical market only - a price fixed market with only a few salaried
employees who get wages possibly, indexed for a false inflationary metric of
prices rising using a fallacious metric of CPI as the basis for changes in prices
(presumably through bank loans but that is NOT the case). Bank loans NEVER
happen and are all on principal (pun intended)...unrepayable! Now
continuing, if money is taken out it has to be in aggregate to be deflation. If
money is inputted into the system, it should happen soon after, otherwise
prices will decline to make up for it and have differentials. Differentials imply
always that money has to be added, and either way it won't work. This side
up or the other side down, deflation and inflation never work. In circular
fashion prices never achieve anything for the business owner or the
consumers at large. At the founation of the market, the government owns all
the companies, and consumers get their salaries extraneous to the market
due to the black hole of input costs (see above).

Money if added in terms of 25 dollars by a bank lender contract to a business


investor, would then be required to remove by the central bank 50 dollars for
there to be deflation or anything above 25 dollars even by a penny. Inflation
and deflation work in aggregates. Money needs to be added, yet inflation is
only hypothetical. Inflation is required but it never works. Deflation is only
relativized inflation. Money would have to immediately be added to the
system in a savings loser zone, a savings bucket of waste of dollars in market
disequilibrium, after money is removed through deflation.

America has so many citizens, that means 318 million, yet less than half of
americans are actually working at 123 million citizens who pretend to be
employees, using terms such as average employees. Average employees
means nothing, you should only tally employees as total, you don't add the
number of employees and divide by some other differential amount. That is a
fallacious bullshit math. a bullshit major by many sinecures pretending to
work. A lot of jobs are being thrown out for the decorator people who like nice
resumes without getting their feet wet. Nice cold pale feet for those idiots
pretending...everything is crime and fraud and pretense in this market and
society and this book proves this mathematically and economically. This
whole society has been economically debunked. So these numbers are
proving even by the current standards no one is working, and everyone is
sitting on their asses doing nothing, and are just retired. No in reality they are
living off the backs of the government and the numbers are much higher than
the welfare recipients in america.

this is an excerpt from the infamos forbes article:

3) Over 50% of the working population (120 million individuals) works in a small
business
yet in the same article it reads:
10) Approximately 75% of all U.S. businesses are nonemployer businesses
How can you reconcile 50 percent of the working population working in small
businesses, as employees and 75 percent of all US businesses being non employer
companies. That means employees don't exist in America, that is the conclusion being
drawn yet the article is lying with subterfuge saying they do. There is a massive
contradiction in these figures.
These articles are damning and prove the whole market is a laughable scam that is going
to be uncovered with serious federal, state, criminal, civil, and international geneva
accords based indictments akin to nuremberg - not the court of hague. This is a racially
based apartheid against one race that is forced to work as a minority group in America
that gets 0 recognition for anything they do.
The figures also prove that 100 million people are on welfare checks. Yet Donald trump
is saying 43 million americans are on welfare. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-
meter/statements/2016/jul/21/donald-trump/trump-43-million-americans-food-stamps/
http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/354-percent-109631000-welfare
The fact however is, besides this other absurd retarded depiction of contradiction, that
most americans are not working at all -- it's not just 100 million, its' all of them. Maybe
maximum 20 million americas are actually working, and that is being very generous.
That is the minority that is under racial apartheid who is actually working.
There are only 30 million businesses in america, barely any corporations. How the hell
can you have fortune 500 companies and military industrial complex with so few
companies and actual entities? What about all the natural resource industries mining,
producing and yolking goods together to make equipments and materials, oil drilling and
welding, and manufacturers of cars, airplanes, BMW, Ford, Honda? All these cars and
airplane companies. All these weapons manufacturers like lockheed martin and at$t?
use the word unitary tranasction for the permutations chain in the finite..that's what it is.
it is only an illusion that there are more transactions because the probability is as between
2 businesses transacting between each other, and then the probability causes the point
break wherein finite sets are broken.
There is a unitary transaction in the finite set. Multiple transactions are not possible, in
fact the illusion lies in the one Buyer and seller in the B.S. slope cascade downward. The
higher buyer and lower seller, do one transaction, where nothing occurs but loss in the
end and superfluous gain. There is no actual profit. Only one transaction that is to no
avail.
The next issue to discuss is probabilities. As we discussed, probabilities of human choice
are intricately and inseverably tied to the profit and numerical aspects of the market. So
what you have to understand is that Although it appears that if you apply bilateral
occlusion, wherein a stake is place in transactions that a Buyer company does not sell to
the same company is transacting between. What that means is that, as between 2
companies, 2 more companies are require for the opposite transaction that is different for
each one relativistically used respectively by each company. Note that I use the word
relativistic a lot, as my theories demonstrate, which means I am the real Einstein, the
latter of which is a fake physicist and scientist in history, a sinecure as part of this charade
mind control program that institutes a fake economic system for women to be shoppin' - I
mean that quite literally. Only pansies pretend to work - how about panties.
The fact is businesses split from finite sets. But it appears when you do transactions that
that doesn't work, with permutations in a finite set past the number 2 businesses. But that
is not true. The fact is each company buys and sells to another company. When you play
out those permutations it might not be obvious, but the finite companies split actually to a
whole doubling of the set. How can 6 companies, as discussed, Buy to one company
individually and sell to another and there not be a situation where in the amount of
companies double then what is actually there in physical reality? That is not possible.
Multiple transactions are also imputed in this probability, that is, volume sales, which is
not possible. Every company only gets one transaction, that's it, the Buyer seller
downward slope cascade. So this is already an illusion for companies transacting as
between each other, the domino effect switch Elimination precludes it. Further
transactions are contingent on new companies arriving infinitely, and that is all there is to
it. That is why the government controls all companies, and price fixes as we discusssed.
Price fixing is not the same as a fraudulent inflation as between transactions, it is just
setting prices while businesses don't actually work on profit. Stocking and setting and
maintaining goods and products, and especially services are not based on purchases and
sales to obtain input costs materials and labor. That is not happening for each business, to
recoup with profit and make a living.
The fact of the matter is if every one company does only one transaction in a finite set,
the finite set always splits by one company, so no finite set is possible. That is the
immutable fact of the market.
But let us hypothetically deal with the market in terms of the situation wherein businesses
are buying and selling to each other. They will never go to the third businesses with each
other. One company will sell to that other business, but the first company will not buy
from that company in the buyer and seller alternator switch. What that means is
companies split off because we need more and more, we cannot probablistically go to that
company. It is not ever going to happen on a constant basis. Businesses will constantly
fetch another company because company owners don't go to that extra business based on
probability human choice. Human choice is more geographically disperesed, and even
you could say random. The end result is a situation where in real time, in the penumbra of
transactions during the work day, or work week and work month, businesses split off and
new companies appear on a rolling basis out of thin air, that is the requirement, based on
this coalesced probability that is real based on 2's. IT takes 2 baby cakes. 2 companies
will split because they only would theoretically do one transaction with each other, on a
regular basis; as we know numerically that is because of constant loss otherwise. But in a
finite system that is what you get, constant loss. There is a massive illusion within
permutations that is being destroyed here. Permutations using the same choice principle
lead to an opposite result from reality once 2 companies are accreted to more, 3, or 30
million companies in the market as a finite set.
So what you must realize is that if you apply this probability as between four companies
(chahar in Farsi for the number 4), companies will split out to five (in the buyer and seller
switch off), and you cannot wait for other companies to simply do things to make up for
that extra company, to some how limit the finite set number from breaking out in a
waterfall that destroys the possibility of a set physical number of business. In other words
waiting will not work in the finite set because it means you will not be transacting during
the day, because there are bills that compound that companies in terms of living expenses
and businesses expenses (rent, labor, equipment) need to take care of that they will not be
covered if companies wait for days at a time for just one company to show up.
Companies are transacting right there while others are transacting through those primary
transactions. That occurs in severable cascades throughout the market, holistically, state
by state and across state lines. Companies are really split in cross sectional groupings,
and new companies are begotten from those transactiosn based on going to new
companies for purchases and selling to new companies for just one company. SO splits
happen from finite sets all throughout the market, in different pieces of the cake, if you
will.
So in the end splits happen from finite sets in severable portions, and that means a lot of
new companies are required through these volume sale transactions. You see a perfect
analogy that is really one to one with what actually happens in the market with volume
sales, with new higher buyers and weaker sellers adding on that aren't even there in the
finite set to begin with, when companies do multiple transactions. Remember, the slope
only allows for one unitary transaction of higher buyer companies and weaker priced
seller companies down the cascade in the coordinate plane. There are only 2 companies
that appear in this illusion, and that is bull shit (B.S.). Market transactions are not
possible. The domino effect prevails. This applies for stock profits, and business profits -
two sullied corrupted foundations that prevent transactions from naturally occurring.
Employees go through the same process. Employees have to be a minority in the system,
the reason why is because the waterfall will lead to a situation where in past a certain
minority threshold amount, the 40 percent mark will lead to a situation wherein
employees are no longer playing hopskotch to jump into businesses as salaried entities.
They are going to be transacting as between companies they work for. As you must
realize is the first probability will always be that no single employee from one company
will ever transact with another business wherein that employee bought from the store the
first employee, he or she is working for. What that means is that the third company that
the first company employee goes to won't be the same company the second companies
employee goes to, based on the same probability discussed. This means that employees
will split past the minority point, due to transacting between companies they work for.
After the 40 percent threshold is reached, which is presumably the point at which the
market will be FORCED to deal with employees or business owner consumers
transacting as between companies - real actual transactions not ersatz transactions for
CGI's that do not have to abide by human probability because number 1: if there were
humans corresponding to them, they would not be real anyway that is how stupid they are
for partaking in this fraud. and 2. the stupid wannabe computer generated images that are
used would not have to follow human activity outside of working at the business owned
by the government with highly technologically advanced tools and utilities to implement
all known practical aspects of life.
So what you see from there is that this probability for employees switches to a situation
that no employee buys from the same store as another employee. That probability is
essentially the same, actually, precisely and exactly the same as how two employees don't
go to the same store after one transaction. This means that every employee goes to
another business. That implies repetition, if the finite set cascade were to say static. In
other words, employees would be forced to do business with their own business all the
time. That is the implication. All the time, constantly, back to back through time. That is
not possible. Every employee would go to their own business, and presumably they
would use the finite set as well, but what this really implies about the probability of not
buying from the same business you buy from (for a company owner), or an employee not
buying from the same employee's store that bought from his/her own store - what that
means is that this probability should lead to a breaking of the finite set to infinite. At the
very least, a doubling of the finite set of companies. In other words, the 2 by 2 split
should not lead to a finite permutational loopy possibility of maintaining only those
companies that are physically there and not begetting new companies in real time at
infinite speed. So that is a farce, each company goes to a new company, that is the same
probability as no company buys from the same company they sell to, and ALSO equally
in a unitary sense how each employee buys from a different company then the company
from another employee that buys from his business. Employees and business owners
work within the same paradigm as consumers.
Once the minority threshold breaks out into, 40 percent, it will then be forced in a
situation wherein companies and employees are constantly working within these 100
percent immutable probabilities and possibilities, that forces them to jump into new
companies. They actually literally leave their original companies to jump into new
companies in the spectrum. 40 percent or 50 percent = the same percentage. There is a
sabotage of percentages and proportions. Once past the minority threshold people jump
into new companies, and they are actually transacting as amongst each other. No 2 people
in any one time in the penumbra of the market (time wise and transaction wise), ever go
to one single company. That proves that people span out to companies that in aggregate
are not even there, breaking the finite, on a massive scale. Doubling is the minimum of
what happens to any finite set. This is for people who are actually working, whether
employees or business owners. Once you go past 25-30 percent in the market, businesses
will be transacting as amongst each other in cascade groupings, forcing companies to
shift into the probability wherein no 2 companies are going to do business with the same
single company. Anything past this 3 way point, which is easily transmuted to the
probability of no business buys and sells to the same business (there are only unitary
transactions) --- is only illusion. The system opreates in terms of unitary transactions and
2's, and that is what is PROVEN by this premise. 3's, 4's etc. and multiple volume sales
and purchase transactions never happen. They imply waiting, they imply loss, they imply
impossibilities, and they imply requirements of infinite elimination and megadeath of the
money market.
Now what you must realize is that between three businesses if each company goes to
another company. One company goes to one company for selling, and another company
goes to another company for buying, that is 2 companies for every individual company.
Each individual entity, goes to two different companies. So when you look at the example
of 3 companies, you will see that each company goes to 2 different companies, if there
are only 3, then each company actually has 3 within and embedded to itself. That meanas
companies are doing business with each other. Just based on one business each company
has 2 companies attached to it - this means that all 3 companies as proven by the 3
businesses in the finite set exist in the first company, that means that companies are
transacting with themselves, not just with other companies in the finite set. The same
applies for 2 companies, each company goes to two different companies - there are
already three implicated. That means the finite set is broken, into infinite just based off
two or three. The reason why companies split, one company buys from another, but the
probability of buying and also selling to the same company is zilch. 0. In monetary terms
for a business this is proven by the loss factor, since bilateral transactions between two
companies leads to PROFIT LOSS. So spanning out to another company is guaranteed,
and is provable by AHURA MAZDA.
The fact is everyone goes to another company, even as employees, no two employees go
to the same company means that third company is not visited by the same two original
employees. They will all eventually go to another store even if one isolate butterfly
preventing the effect, doesn't go to another store as the second employee in the trilateral
conflagration, he will eventually buy his pack of cigarettes from another store on some
regularity wherein the market will split based on this probability choice factor.
What this means is that in the aggregate sense, the market splits from any physical point
of reality in terms of business entities being visited by employees, simply based on an
employee visiting ANOTHER store than the one that another employee visited,
simultaneously as the one that that other employee works for. This forces the market to
break out, actually doubling the amount of businesses. IT cannot be explained by normal
logic of mathematics, but it actually does, proving the existence of AHURA MAZDA.
What this means is that the majority of people are not real. That is how stupid they are for
partaking in this crime and fraud, and apartheid - they are not even real. This proves it
mathematically through choice. All finite systems split out into double what is there,
volume sales and volume transactions will not obfuscate the immutability of choice
between business entities.
Everything is one transaction in the market, and the market is a macroeconomic and
microeconomic system - this means that as a whole the market will probablistically
always split to more than there is, to infinite. This pertains to businesses, and it also
pertains to employees (see chart).
There can only be a minority of employees. No companies are even possible in this
system and would still not exist. Once the market reaches 50 percent of healthy operating
companies, those companies will transact as between each other. Transacting as between
each other is when employees and companies with employees (companies using
employees as proxies or vice versa) start to rapidly span out due to human choice, forcing
business owners to leave their business based on the percentage that actually is working.
This means that it is not possible for employees to a majority. We already knew
businesses cannot be a majority. The reason is that all companies buy from another
company, and when they start to transact as between each other they span out in an
ERECTION to more than 100 percent of the market. They hop out of their companies to
buy from each other, because they cannot increase in amount of business entities. That we
know mathematically is not possible. A business cannot function mathematically or
numerically with money, but if it WERE possible to function in a government operated
pool with fraudulent owners, that would be the case. It is not however, possible in this
physical world in terms of monetary dollars and cents. The buyer and seller bullshit one
unitary transaction method remains.
For employees the same principles apply. The market can only be a minority of
employees who work in companies that do not transact with each other, it cannot be more
than 30 percent. 40 percent or more will lead to transactions for companies as between
each other, leading to a holocaust erection of the minority set to having more companies
then there are, leaving their businesses. It's a tautological contradiction, and makes no
sense in the scope of the market.
So the market is a complete fraud. This presents a new science and mathematics not
known to the planet.
This is what the Cyrus Cylinder was trying to prove, with Kourosh Shah's speech about
human rights; to prove that systems like this and people like this PREVENT human
rights. They will be indicted, and they will suffer.
The truth is this: There are 2 businesses. Each employee from each of those businesses
goes to another company, this means that you cannot even have 2 companies. The 2
companies split to more, to infinite.
How about 3 companies? Those are illusions. 3 companies imply volume transactions,
there is only one transaction in aggregates for employees (those are the ones who beget
MORE companies then there are), and volume transactions imply waiting within the
penumbra of time meaning companies are not working and neither are employees. Time
is not even an element in the choice mechanism established by AHURA MAZDA. The
third company that both businesses or employees do not visit TOGETHER does not exist,
because once the system reaches macro level past the minority threshold, the whole
market splits into infinite and there are more companies then there are in a growing
avalanche of companies, and whatever percentage the businesses are reaches a higher
point - this is not even possible. Minority is the only way it can go. Minority Report. That
is the only amount of employees that can exist within the "fraud" pool actually controlled
by a benevolent government.
The system works in 2's, and that means only one transaction is even allowed, anything
else is impossible in a macroecnomic sense. The amount of businesses would double
from any finite set cascade of businesses. This proves that probabilities of human choice
coalesce with numerical aspects and monetary aspects.
Minority businesses are not a possibility to begin with. They are antithetical due to input
costs aggregating far beyond profit gradients.
Now we must also consider how the threshold causes businesses to change their
probability, becuase now as they are growing and growing, at the same instantaneous
contemporaneous synchronized time, business probability of choice is changing where in
the same probability arrives: no two companies buy from the same company. The third
company is that same company. In other words, two companies not buying AND selling
from each other and only doing one or the other, and not going to the third company
together in concert is the same as two companies transacting with each other as
MEMBERS of the finite set, and in only ONE unitary transaction, and not arriving at the
other company. They will never go to that other company together. This splits out
companies to more than there are, implying and proving only one unitary transaction. The
aggregate cultivates and builds to the point where employees even LEAVE their own
businesses, creating a schism and impossibility. People hopping and taking off from their
jobs to jump into companies that are not even their own, and not returning to work. They
fall into another black hole, a vortex of the economic world.
The domino effect takes hold, for aggregates in the market for money, medium of
exchange - and majority or even super majority of employees is impossible. The real
maximum amount of employees is much smaller when you actually look at the
probability, the maximum should be 20 percent. Anything more it goes into aggregate
lock down which means the whole market will spill over - the cup wilt runeth over. And
that means employees in a majority sense will not exist. SO there is a point break.
Anytime the market is high with employees it will be a natural aggregate with companies
who have employees as proxies, FORCING companies to be more than there are, but
actually forcing employees to continue to aggregate in the probability of no two
employees going to the same business. The regularity of it is immaterial through time, or
any component. It is a simple matter of choice.
In reality, businesses will always double, or even triple, and that is implied by the infinite
nature of the system - companies split into bits into the hinterneverland ranch of
nonentities.
The market dies in the domino effect which is 100 percent completely and totally
radically analogous to probability choice in the market of only one unitary transaction. So
remember kids, that means Buyers higher, and sellers lower down the cascade slope.
Bullshit leads to nothing more than one transaction actually, and macroeconomics is the
same thing as microeconomics. The fuse is lit and the market dies: human choice is
equivalent to the economic numerics in the market.
This infinite flux presents a new mathematics that destroys permutations and
combinations within finite sets that are pure illusions (See graph). It destroys practical
application of markets and pseudo intellectual competition - fake yuppies working as fake
competitors, while only a minority is actually working in a racial apartheid which will
achieve serious criminal indictments and vituperations and castigations. The market is a
farce. Money is a farce and not possible to use.
The probability between employees changes from buying from another store then the
other employee in the original 2 set, to simply 2 employees in the whole market severably
and in aggregate not buying from the same one single store. The probabilities are the
same because they imply one transaction between 2 companies, and the third company is
fetched but never recieved by both employees. This is the same probability, transmuted in
to semantically two scenarios that achieve nothing once aggregates compound -
aggregation is a compounding process that kills the whole market with the physical
appearance of one extra store. One store is added on that is never there, a shadow
company. This kills the whole chance of people being real in the majority sense of the
world that are buying or even appearing at multiple stores.
The reality is that this system does not operate because there is a variegation in the types
and amounts of stores. This means there is a probability to go to various stores that exists
- various business entities. This means that due to human choice and probabilities
businesses fan out from the finite set, to infinite (not finite).
There is also the same probability with companies. Companies buy and sell, respectively
to two different businesses. Which means based on the third company not recieving both
original company owners - this achieves the same probability logically and logistically as
two company owners not buying or selling to the same single store. Both probabilities are
the same.
There is an illusion wherein there is only one increase, as in the increase of one company
to the finite set based on the natural immutable reified aspect of these probabilities of
human choice. But in fact it should be doubled no matter what - how about tripled. The
finite set expands infinitely.
The system works in 2's. Any other system is an illusion of businesses going to a third or
4th business, etc. That is an illusion that will never work. In reality, the system always
splits at two given the immutable probability of no two companies or no two employees
transacting between the same two businesses over time, in any regularity. Human choice
precludes it. 2 is the immutable number of the system. It is a bilateral system.
The domino effect will take hold no matter what and the buyer and seller down cascade
will kill the market in a fuse, an instant with no transactions. Multiple transactions
through time are not possible. Time is extraneous to the choice factor and the numerical
monetary factor for both employees and businesses. Time is an illusion in the process.
Waiting games and losing businesses or not paying bills in the alacrity of costs never
occur - for either employees or companies. Remember, also the employee can be culpable
for not going anywhere to buy anything - aka starving artist or end up being homeless due
to not paying bills. Time is never a component in this issue, or geography, etc. on an
aggregate scale for companies. This is a transactional system, with unitary transactions.
Primary transactions are the only things that occur. The condition of going to another
business than the one you are alreay going to, is immutable, for businesses this concerns
the alternate switch transaction of buying vs. selling to another company, and for
employees this concerns going to another business than the one who has an employee
who bought from your own business. That probability coalesces into a transmutation of
no two companies or no two people go to the same company to do transactions.
You have to realize here that employees and business owners are the proxies, or the nodes
used to apply these probabilities, begetting more companies then there are in any finite
physical cascade plane.
In terms of the buyer and seller cascade of companies in the slope on the coordinate
plane: Consider how prices being the same forces them in the same category of the
cascade if they do not do business with each other. Buying together, or selling together.
THE REASON is because they did not do business with each other, they fall under the
same category of the cascade because the PRIMARY unitary transaction did not split the
prices in a cascade formation to have them in difference stances, buying now for one
price, and a higher price selling item.
So commerce splits prices into the cascade formation. IF you dont do business with each
other you are in the same category. It has to do with status based on price tag. No one did
business with them in the set therefore they are the same price and same stance. THAT IS
THE REASON. That is final. It has nothing to do with not doing business with each other
but it is also presumed because some other person did business with them. Otherwise
they are not a business.
Salaries only concern one system. It is not a bifurcated process wherein living costs and
business costs have to be taken into account. Salaries provide for bills and input costs,
bills are provided on a rolling basis. This means that as your salaries are provided, bills
are paid and meted out on a one to one level. That does not require anything more than
budgeting, so it is possible to do. IT does not require worrying about two levels of
expenditure to make the money in the first place to provide for living expenses, which is
a chance game. Salaries are paid and provided for according to the amount given, which
can be indexed to inflation, based on price fixing by the government for products and
services. That would mean that salaries and pay checks would change by a percentage in
relation to price changes in the aggregate (average prices using indexes such as the
consumer price index). That percentage change theoretically is not explainable - perhaps
that price change percentages is simply a 1:1 percentage change with the CPI, as in, the
total salary is increased or decreased (which is impossible in the market as a whole but
would involve subsequent inflation, or relative inflation as discussed - deflation is NOT
possible) - by the amount the CPI changes weekly or monthly. But it could also mean one
pay check is changed by that percentage, or 2 paychecks, or HOURLY billing for the
wage that a worker has.
This allows for salaries and proper budgeting - to promote the possibility of employees.
The system allows for employees, but not business owners in the aggregate for the
reasons discussed thoroughly above. So bills are essentially input costs that work 1:1 and
there is no necessity for a gradient higher, to actually produce profit to maintain life
expenditures such as rent, bills, food, cars, children. Salaries are simply a product of
amounts paid out to workers in order to cover expenses, and it is theoretically possible to
get a salary for a minority of workers. Rolling basis allows for bills to be paid for.
Medium of exchange herein is possible.
It is important to discuss how in the stock market the domino effect and finite set implies
total fraudulent money due to the inflationary aspect and also bilateral occlusion in
transactions, and profiteering which begets higher prices. If prices were to be maintained
in a total finite set, prices go up infinitely with infinite dollars. The fraudulent aspects of
maintaining those infinite dollars for weaker sellers and buyers who are transacting in the
stock market - would implicate a total retarded system. Buyers would be funded to cover
sellers. The same applies for businesses in the finite market.
There is also a possibility to consider both buying and selling as one unitary primary
transaction, instead of multiple transactions. That could be a conception for probabilities
of choce and also for numerical aspects of profiteering in the market. However, multiple
transactions imply waiting game in the market - which means that some companies don't
transact as discussed, and there is a time schism meaning some businesses transact before
others. That time schism is fatal and means no one is achieving business when bills need
to have paid. That is actually the same thing as the profit gradient vs. input cost (profit
margin vs. total market price), which implies that bills are added up before one can even
produce a sale, meaning inflationary savings is used to cover those bills thus killing
business in bankrutpcy. That is a time schism in essence, which really implies that
someone else is doing business instead of you in that MOMENT in time which implies a
time period wherein bills are also invoiced before a sale by that business that is legally
contractually responsible for those bills. Competition in the end eliminates the market.
There is also something you have to consider wherein the choice aspect that kills the
market with the "third" business that both companies do not go to transactually which
already implies multiple transactions for both buying and selling - something that can
never happen therefore the finite set is broken --- this can also occur with 4 businesses
(chahar in farsi) which begets 5 in real time. The CHOICE factor alone kills any
possibility wherein time loops can promulgate multiple transactions (volume sales)
consecutively and accretionally, businesses strictly based on 1 to 1 choice aspects are
forced to break out and split, and whether it is 3, 4, 5, or 15, it is a system that is
destroyed based on twos. All multiple transactions are an illusion only one transaction is
allowed for every company this is proven by the huge ground breaking mathematical
theorem whererin permutations were destroyed that every company goes to a new
company, and every employee goes to just 1 new company. That aspect, the idea of going
to a NEW place for everyone, proves the market can NEVER stay finite, alone. That is
the real breakthrough here. This system can never physically stay put, it must break out
into infinite directions. That is inherent in its design, proving the crime and racial
designated apartheid by the majority of americans which is the only way this works, as
well as breathtaking technological breakthroughs by the government to make workers
think they could get away with it. The government is not likely in on this fraud, which is
totally unconstitutional and goes against the international human rights geneva
conventions.
Companies themselves cannot be tourists from a "fraudulent national market", because
endemic businesses in one national market kill the market as per the domino effect. That
is the basis to kill the market: transactions between companies, not the illusion of raining
down free fraudulent inflationary money for poser employees and poser business owners
to swallow up. Companies as between each other don't work - therefore there is no
possibility of having some portion of tourists or retired people or tycoons showing up at
the doors of other countries transactionally day by day, day by day for the majority of the
consumption society only market to buy things that prop up the market artificially. That
can never happen - only one economic market exists despite Gdp and fake gpa's g8
countries - and that is the united states market and it is designed strictly to vituperate
morons and make sure that this never happens again- an experiment in the stupidity of
certain human beings, who are born liars and thieves and will be easily punished with
serious violations and penalties in the eyes of God and the law.
The whole idea of whole governments buttressed by visiting spectators and tourists is not
sufficient and suggests constant day by day inflationary transactions, is impossible
because that means every single transaction which is required for profits is not possible
unless visitors provide that money - and is a hypothetical anyway since price is killed in
the process due to the price lin competition that works in 2 by 2 pairs. 2 is the magic
number. Perhaps even 5 magics, to quote a Megadeth song off of Rust in Peace, one of
my favorite thrash metal album of all time.
Inflation metrics are variegated, but today the only metric applied is the average
Consumer Price Index summation of percentage increases. How is that possible that CPI's
even are 0 percent? That is absurd and impossible that even on an average level that the
total CPI percent could ever be 0 percent relative to a previous point of aggregate price in
the whole market. That disproves the CPI, the CPI should always have changes in
percent. How come negative percentages of CPI always imply deflation? Are you telling
me that in the AGGREGATE of the whole market that there was a loss of money for that
period of time, relative to a previous point as an actual loss of money? NO WAY! That
means no banks are lending any NEW money. All lending is new money. Everyone here
has to realize that. 0 percent no inflation systems imply a system wherein banks are not
lending, you cannot have a system without bank loans! 0 percent no inflation is not
possible. Disinflation is actually what that CPI is talking about, in other words,
relativized lowered inflation from a previous accretion.
Given that we must consider that this method of using prices of goods and services to
determine inflation rates to adjust salaries, as discussed above, is not a good method
because it does not truly discuss the ramifications of changes in inflation. Inflation has to
be a percentage change in MONEY SUPPLY. Anyone who is copying me about this
topic, will be sorely mistaken when they realize inflation does not even work in this
market though it is REQUIRED. I am the one to identify that inflation works in this
market.
I am the one in 2013 that identified inflation was being USED by the rich and central
banks (the federal reserve, ECB, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), World Bank,
and IMF), to adjust wealth for the rich higher and higher relative to the inflation rates that
are much lower, to have higher and higher salaries relative to the regular populace. The
majority suffers, even makes lower than inflation rates, while the RICH hide money in
bank accounts due to huge increases in money supply. That is a pyramid scheme that I
identified. In that mechanism I identified with my treatise Premeditated Inflation 2013 -
that inflation requires going above the rate of inflation. Going above the rate of inflation
to even have inflation is the rule - the axiom - the law - the ghanun (in Persian). That
means that inflation is a contradicition, or rather, it is a circular argument. It never
achieves anything it is an oroborus, and we proved all of that mathematically, logically,
economically in this treatise. Going above the rate of inflation to achieve inflation
indicates that inflation can never happen. Going above the rate of inflation indicates that
money is not being used, and we know that what happens if all salaries are indexed to the
rate of inflation that wealth in real terms using the CPI formula never increases. It is just
a change in nominal amounts of salaries. At the same time, there is no profit, but only a
1:1 fully aggregate and severable transfer from salaried employees to employers. That is
actually a market disequilibrium, which means a loss due to a loss of money since prices
are the equivalent of salaried input costs for employees. That is the substratum,
corruption of fraud yet does nothing to achieve that differential higher. This proves that
corruption and corrupted SYSTEMS even by a nose hair, or the hairless ass of sergeant
slaughter, never achieves a system. A hard drive that has a virus and is corrupted, that
means that the computer will never start and boot.
The fact is deflation is never possible. Negative percentages actually imply reverse
inflation, which we discussed is deflation that is POSSIBLE deflation. That's the real
deflation. Deflation as in removal of the money supply is never possible. So negative
percentages mean lowered salaries than prior. Disinflation is actually higher salaries, but
by a lesser percent. Oh wow, I got a great gift from the company paycheck, just less than
the previous gift...boo hoo. That's what disinflation is. But it is misleading according to
CPI and news figures. People do not realize how 0.5 percent inflation is still inflationary
and higher, despite the previous weak being 4 percent inflation. That is a relativized
increase in the money supply. Actual removal of the money, however, is not possible.
That causes a break in the system that is not tenable. Inflation means novel money,
transactional inflationary money that prevents the use of savings and bankruptcy. So that
is why 0 percent, savings buckets and bubbles, are not possible, because that is a
bankruptcy domino effect dead zone bucket where nothing ever takes off, kind of like led
zeppelin. How about rolling stones - gold never rolls. Loss systems are implied where
there is no addition of money. Reverse inflation wherein money and prices are reduced,
are savings inflationary systems wherein prices are reduced to mitigate past losses, but in
fact money must always be injected in an inflationary set up. Inputs of money are
required prior to every recoupment of price, and pennies on the dollar used to provide for
those input costs of business are not possible to be mitigated with differentials of price
that are so high relative to input cost disbursements. Logistically that is not possible, and
AHURA MAZDA will not allow it. Supply and demand would not allow for all the costs
of businesses to use black markets to provide for costs that would skirt in real time, what
can never happen in the end of time. Mathematically input costs are never higher than
recoupments based on dollars and cents, so what that implies is that money and medium
of exchanges of any variety cannot achieve profit. So we must acknowledge here that
deflation is in fact, impossible. Inflation works from above, and below: as above so
below. All for one and..none for all. There is no justice for all, to quote Metallica. So the
CPI is a scam on an average mean basis. CPI must be about increases in prices as a result
of INCREASES in money. A product of increases in money through loans that affect
prices in different directions. The problem with this assessment is that even a penny
increase in prices, can not distinguish other increases in prices due to profits from
variegated businesses. There would be no way to tell how much to subsequently increase
loans in order to maintain business. Loans would be the rule in this system, due to
requirements of inflation.
Inflation based on paychecks and transactional aspects of the market, check by check
week by week, is the only way the market can work to prevent savings. So using the CPI,
you always have to know that inferentially central banks are going to loan money to
increase possibility of commerce. Loans must be injected into the system constantly - this
provides for a system that is functionable.
What you then have to realize is that, using the CPI will not change the fact that the rate
of inflation never has to increase. The rate of inflation only increases due to the supply
and demand nature of the market, for companies to make profits higher than before. That
is the hypothetical scenario. Yet even at 0 percent inflation, higher and higher loans need
to be added to the system by the central banks. That is a contradiction, because loans
being added in order to maintain a 0 percent inflationary rate, would mean that the same
increase in inflation as before would be constantly added. This means the previous rate of
inflation would be required plus any increase. This is the difficult part to understand. If
there is 6 dollars in the system, and you increase the CPI by 50 percent, that would mean
the total aggregate nominal amount of money in the system would be 9 dollars. That is
because you have to take into account the PREVIOUS salaries, which is the total amount
of money in the system at any one time. All prices are just input costs of salaries, in a one
to one relationship, and any mitigation of that in an upward differential gradient is called
market price and would require fraud and would not allow the system to operate and
function, in other words money in excess of salaries.
The point is that the total amount of money in percentage increases of inflation, can still
be a 0 percent inflation - but it would require previous salaries, so therefore money must
be added by banks to the system in aggregate. Even 0 percent inflation means there is
actual inflation.
So the previous rate of inflation is just that total percentage increase, which is actually
different from the number of the percent, relative to the loans and money supply in the
system. So if you have a 50 percent increase, you are adding the previous salary amount
plus 50 percent of that amount. So 6 dollars turns to 9 dollars in total loans. So previous
rates of inflation and salaries need to be added not just percentages that are smaller
accretions because that would imply deflation due to lowered paychecks numerically.
Lowered paychecks = deflation, but still inflationary so we will use the word reverse
inflation. That is the term of art.
The point to be taken is that the total amount of money in aggregate is what would be the
next percentage increase, due to repayment requirements of loans. So even a 0 percent
increase after the 9 dollar increase in loans, which is 15 dollars from the original 6 dollars
- would be 30 dollars total. 0 percent would have to include all the loans because the bank
has to be repaid. That would be essentially freezing all bank accounts in the system for
repayment - all loans outstanding need to be repaid by the same amount, and that proves
loans are unrepayable because the repayability of loans is deflationary and antithetical to
the market = as we discussed, deflation is impossible in the market. Removing all the
loans kills commerce, yet is required with double the tuna, to repay the first half, and the
second half is still unrepayable and the total is unrepayable on principle alone.
That is another example of the Sabotage in economics, wherein inflation rates are
destroyed, by numbers that make no sense. It was already absurd that adding 50 percent
meant also adding the original 100 percent to the 50 percent, making it 150 percent
additional money for just a 50 percent ostensible nominal increase in the money supply
through something called the consumer price index. Besides that 0 percent would imply
repetition of the previous salary and loan amount, because the previous salary means you
get the same paycheck and there's no inflation. It is a system of paychecks.
Producers and consumers, that dichotomy rules the system. It is a division that is played
out in pure mathematical and numerical aspects. There is no question that proves that
AHURA MAZDA, God, exists, to create systems wherein numbers and money as well as
concepts and constructs such as producers and consumers transmute and are transitively
one.
Probabilities and mathematics/economics/numerics coalesce. Strictly mathematics
actually, with mediums of exchange in competition based 2 by 2 systems.
Percentage changes based on a percent of the total aggregate money supply, for inflation,
mean nothing because it could imply inflation. Inflation must always include previous
rates of inflation, or previous salaries. That is a relativized inflation. So therefore the
previous salary amount based on that inflation percentage, must then be repeated with the
addition relative to that salary. But as we learned, due to bank loan repayments, that
changes and the total unrepaid money supply must be taken into account. So there is a
minus to the equation. Bank loans as a total must be subtracted, that have already been
repaid.
MS (Money Supply) = BL (Bank Loans total unrepaid aggregate) - BL repaid already.
Given that equation, you would then have to see how not providing the previous rate of
inflation, would mean that salaries would not be proper, and would not actually be
inflationary DESPITE having more money in the system even in aggregate relative to
removal of money, creating a ridiculous contradiction. An astounding contradiction that
cannot be reconciled with the data. That means that 0 percent inflation is not only
impossible, but is also indicative of constant inflation as well - upward vats of money
thrown into the market without any possibility of lack of injection. This turns its head all
notions of a non inflationary system. The problem is real wealth is never achievable, and
those people supporting 0 inflation are liars. 0 inflation in this set up creates higher
nominal values of wealth, but no changes in real wealth. Higher nominal wealth and no
change in real wealth (relative wealth over time despite changes in prices vis a vis
salaries) - means no one has gained a penny despite the numbers going up in salaries and
prices. As we know, it is impossible for real wealth to exist to begin with, because there is
no such thing as profit or inflation, the both of which are required for a monetary system
to produce any wealth.
Real Wealth = Profit = Inflation = Higher Nominal wealth. Higher nominal wealth is
required for changes in real wealth. The fact is that you need more and more nominal
wealth in any system of wealth - because this allows for changes in real wealth. That is
only hypothetical if the market actually worked. Money amounts have to go up relative to
price changes for there to be changes in real wealth, and any decreases in inflation by the
use of savings will only eliminate mathematical chance of profit completely. Prices must
go upward, but that implies infinite market participants. Infinite aspects work in tandem:
infinite people, and businesses, infinite dollars, and infinite resources. You cannot just
have a finite system - that will preclude market transactions. You need infinite dollars and
infinite businesses. That means the market is completely sabotaged on all levels, a term
of art I coined. Sabotaged in terms of the finite market set which breaks to infinite no
matter what - sabotaged. Sabotaged in terms of infinite dollars instead of finite dollars
and cents - sabotaged in terms of metrics of inflation calculation of percentages and
possibilities of loan increases, and sabotaged in terms of total corruption that prevents the
market from ever working even with fraud. The government operates it all and there is no
such thing as a start up business owner, or a ceo. All fake yuppies.
The other type of inflation metric to consider is the loan repayment method. Banks have
an incentive to ever increase inflation based on loan repayment, not simply the price of
goods rising through supply and demand (business owners deciding to increase prices
over time to obtain more wealth relative to currency in the system) - Bank loans have to
be repaid with every aggregate money pool supplied, to repay principal and presumably
imaginary interest which would sky rocket inflation. So that raises money supply, but
does not necessarily raise PRICES.
What you have to understand here is that I'm presenting a postulate wherein money
supply (M1, M2, M3) can increase in a system, yet prices do not have to necessarily
increase. Money supply as we discussed, is even increasing constantly, through infinite
time in commercial transactions, despite prices not having to increase. So bank loans can
accrete in the market, but the actual prices don't have to. That is a schism and a sabotage
that goes against common sense in the market. To conclude, that is why 0 percent
inflation does not necessarily beget a system of constantly the same static money supply
holistic total.
There is also a sabotage of prices. You have to understand that any time there is actual
profit, there is a clash between two rates of inflation, above 0 percent, at a differential. In
other words, two differing amounts of prices are not possible since profit and inflation is
not possible. So if you provide for 100 dollars to buy a product or service, the 100 dollar
good or service is suddenly going to be worth 100.1 cents. That means that the market
price will be raised by any accretion above 0 dollars that is permitted by denominations
of the treasury department coinage, or above - based on whatever the price tag is. This is
the same exact and precise formula Price + X (in dollars and cents) or infinity in terms of
dollars and cents.
This means that savings is required to kill price for even the consumer, not just the
business in the revolving wheel of market transactions wherein input costs of operation of
business adjust prices upward than any current market price, thus eliminating price. Price
elimination.
So you can see how it happens for both businesses and employees. Prices actually
coalesce with input cost because profit is sabotaged, wherein 2 rates of inflation occur
above 0. That is what is required for profit, because the current rate of inflation is 0...a
1:1 at all times no matter what frauds are implicated with excess extraneous infinite
dollars.
So in other words, anything above 0 is the guy who is supplying that extra money to give
the business owner profit, and it does not work, so both inflation rates are sabotaged and
transmuted to 0 from originally 0. Nothing ever gets done in the market with money.
The input cost becomes the price tag, and even 2 dollars price for a computer vs. 100
dollars provided in an auction like scenario would make the 2 dollar price turn to 101
dollars. Nothing can spare this system. Price tags are always eliminated by higher price
tags supplanting them in market transactions. Supply and demand is further eliminated.
The inflation metrics have been covered. There are three. Random accretions of
percentages of money supply is not sufficient because it does not take into account the
ramifications of previous salaries. Inflation would turn into deflation no matter what the
percent unless previous rates that are ADDITIONAL to the percents are added on. That is
a sabotage of the market through inflation.
The second is CPI which uses price tags but price tags are meaningless if supply and
demand does not increase inflation. A single penny in profit above input cost vs. another
business making hypothetically, 2 dollars in profit, will not be mitigated. There is no way
to tell how much to increase price, but in the end that would be based on loans that are
due to supply and demand.
Businesses can never go above the rate of inflation, because what businesses supply to
consumers is always a 1:1 ratio that never begets money higher for profit. So inflation is
always at 0, and proper inflation means changes in price tags and wealth, which means
the contradiction of inflation going above the rate of inflation - a circular argument
oroborus sabotage that goes nowhere. and I don't mean the crappy beasty boys song.
The other metric is using the previous rate of inflation with the hidden percent much
higher than the nominal amount that is suggested in the metrics, and in the actual input of
money. That is the third metric. That is a hidden shadow inflation that is required, for
maximum money to be injected into the system.
What you have to realize now is that penny theory for companies in a minority sense
buying from black markets to sell products and services, is not possible. The price of
goods would have to be too high relative to costs. Having past "sales" to cover bills for
house and business, and labor and equipments is just not possible. No current sale ever
covers a bill, so it will never work. Any constancy otherwise would suggest all or nothing
system of always past sales covering current bills of business and living. If you go back
and forth and using current sales and past sales you are using too much savings to cover
business and that means you are bankrupt. That is all there is to know.
Bailouts were a scam, banks did not lend to any of those companies because loans are not
possible and the stock market is not humanly possible. No one uses it, and NASDAQ and
stock picks are a fraud.
All stocks are derivatives at best anyway. Derivatives are stocks upon stocks, or
referential to stocks in the "secondary" or so called "tertiary" stock market, and it is
suggestsed by complete morons on tv shows and internet blogs, internet shows that there
are quadrillions of these so called fake stocks everywhere. That is not possible. But stock
market is not possible to begin with. Stocks are just imagination of transactions, they are
never bought and sold due to the domino effect and "intelligence" aspects that false
sinecures pretend to have which is actually stupidity of gambling. False intelligence.
Bilateral transactions would be a minority set up, that would allow for a majority to do
business in any system without profit and money I dubbed Worldism in my treatise in
2013. The reason is because traveling state lines or outside of the scope of your locality
where everyone worthy to shop after this massive fraud is expurgated and those involved
castigated thoroughly in the eyes of science, God, and the law - would be a rarity and
probablity not even allowed. Everyone goes to the same type of places, therefore no two
people going to the same store that does not operate on money, will not be an issue. They
will go to the same 2 stores. There will not be a stupid pseudo capitalist parapley of
companies lining the whole market where people can shop wherever the hell they want.
Therefore the market will not be in danger of splitting from the finite. This means that the
market can stay locked in place and ready for commerce even with a majority actually
shopping, which is the natural instinct of what the majority should do. Here in this
society, it is actually provable beyond reasonable doubt to a T that the majority is not real,
because the market would have broken out from finite to infinite. That is due to the nature
of human choice and probabilities. That's just how it works when you have a society with
multiple place to go, and a society with implications of serious moral bankruptcy.
So the probability will be muted at best once the fraud is eliminated.
The idea of home businesses being a majority or large minority share of the market is
specious and a fraud. Penny theories and selling gadgets on ebay will be to no avail
mathematically. It is not a quantum argument in the stars some where, it is not possible
numerically with money.
Fractional reserve lending is not probable or possible. Excessive loans that use arbitrary
reserve limits of 10 percent which makes no sense. Those loans will not repay the
principle liabilities of loans held by individual lenders, so even with excess loans in a
hypothetical market, the principle loans that started those loans by the central bank will
not be repayable. Those loans themselves are not repayable as individual loans, which are
full liabilities to each individual that takes that excess money 10 times more than the
original loan amount. Each of those member banks are just one single bank even
admitted, which is called the Federal reserve bank, lending by which has been thoroughly
debunked. Liabilities of other parties become profits at best for one business, and only
profiting businesses can theoretically repay their own liaiblities, but competition prevents
those profits and loans are not possible. Fractional reserve lending will not mollify or be
an analgesic or soporific drug to this pathetic fraud that is a government operation
through and through and exposes very stupid consumers thinking they could get away
with making only a minority work.
Interest rates are made up by the federal reserve bank, by the federal open market
commitee. There is no basis for them, they are made up numbers, and there is not a single
logical or mathematical basis for them - there is no supply and demand basis for it either.
Lower interest rates presumably add more loans due to money being sold cheap, and
higher interest rates make loans harder to procure. The basis by which they are
established is a general market attitude, that is never implemented since loans are not
given to businesses or consumers. Consumer loans as a concept is absurd and not
possible. That includes mortgages for the super majority of americans, which are not
loans in the proper sense so are not related to any process herein - they are not related to
profiting higher than the loan amount of input cost.
We must consider that this system is also disproven through the which came first, the
chicken or the egg theory. If you are taking a loan to start a company in the hypothetical
in this inflationary market which never takes off because inflation doesn't work to beget
profit - then you must consider that this loan will never be repaid and will only be a loss.
Starting a company requires an injection of a loan or stolen money at best - and that leads
to never making money. Not getting that first loan is sciences way of telling you that you
will never make a sale a posteriori to that. A priori input costs are always inflationary
loans of savings that kill companies, no matter what. Price reduction is loss based and
kills profit - and keeping the system finite means the system will not work - infinite
businesses means possibly price staticity which is stupid (no inflation of prices but
inflation in money supply and people, logistics) but that is never possible and never will
work. Natural resources on the planet are not possible to sustain such a thing, and infinite
quantums in the sky businesses are not possibly physically.
Relativistic approach of some market participants just doing business doesn't work
because at the foundation, which kills the market to begin with, business owners cannot
make business. Businesses will not be able on their own to do it, and it also speciously
and fallaciously disregards the totality of other transactors in the revolving wheel which
is broken, of companies switching back and forth and having to deal with massive
domino effects.
Bilateral probability choice and business choice begetting new companies double the
original finite set forces NEW entities to arrive. We can even prove new companies are
not necessary --- you can have limited industries, natural resources, and businesses
(companies) - So that means you can even theoretically conglomeratize the industry into
three or 4 groupings, and just have new business entities arrive out of thin air. With this
theory I prove that bilateral choice occlusion between 2 companies not going to the same
company, and also not buying and selling from each other (a coalescence of one
probability), forces new company entities to arrive and organizations to arrive in the
system. Therefore, conglomeritzation will not preclude companies from spanning and
splitting out.
Treasury bonds are bought and sold by the government as debt bonds - those debt bonds
are not repayable by themselves, the government requires another bond sold, and another
bond or t bill or note sold to even repay the previous loan. So bonds simply add up
infinitely. The whole scam of bonds being bought and sold to change inflation rates is not
true. The whole scam of raising debt ceilings by congress and the president speeches
regarding this subject are not true - debt ceilings must always be raised. The system
requires it because debts must compound and add up infinitely. The treasury bond system
is a scam. A gratuity of a loan to be repaid with interest alone forces the next loans to be
used to repay that first debt, because the first debt alone would have to be fully given
back to the creditor private agent or government agent, and that means the only way to
repay it with interest is to sell another bond to another person to repay the first person.
That means even the next bond used to repay the first one, would require another bond
sold, and another, and another. This produces infinite hyperinflation akin to post world
war 1 germany after the treaty of versailles. So what you have to understand is that the
market is based on this premise because the government is actually using those loans to
pay off presumably government projects like highways, the military industrial complex
like blackwater, lockheed martin and smith, american airlines, etc and oil drilling/gas
companies, as well as bank loans to the federal reserve which are charged infinitely
through the federal reserve system to the united states tax payers debt.
The federal reserve uses these treasury bonds to justify lending to its own banks, with
money they pull out of thin air. Each one of these dollars and pennies to the billions, has a
treasury bond attached to it that the tax payer is liable for. The federal reserve prints out
money out of thin air through digital mediums in order to buy treasury bonds, which is
uses to justify bank loans, as well as lends money to the government backed by treasury
bonds, and expects the tax payers to pay those bonds back. Those bonds are liabilities that
the populace has to pay. That is infinite debts the tax payers are liable for.
So the federal reserve in this process is actually a hypothetical fraud. But bank loans are
not possible. The 12 member banks don't lend money out of thin air, but they are
presumed to, yet the populace finds that okay! The constitution does not justify the
federal reserve. It goes against the coinage clause, the enumerated powers clause, and is
also a member or agency of the executive branch yet is based on congressional legislation
such as the federal bureau of investigation and central intelligence agency - this proves
federal reserve is illegal. The federal reserve is allowed to do whatever it wants, without
government intervention, and yet it is the biggest government entity in the United States
of America. That proves that it is a fraudulent system.
There are three aspects to the system that need to be discussed. The three market
possibilities of transactions dynamically through time are that going back and forth are
that 1) inflationary savings are used for commerce or fraudulent money is used to be
injected to the market and commerce. Back andd forth this means constantly savings
needs to be used that is inflationary through positive dollars, which is bankruptcy, or
fraudulent injected inflationary savings is used by the government for all companies
involved.
2) Inflationary injected fraudulent unrepayable transactional money is given to all
companies to kill price, poor or rich. Every single store out there including local stores
you would think are hardworking middle class owned businesses - they would be
completely fraudulent and NOT operating the companies at all. They are not stocking any
goods or services, or paying any employees, or doing any of the business. There is no half
and half connection with government and worker. They are not even mathematically real
as proven above. Which proves metapyhical aspects that involve religion and God as
coalescing with mathematics and economics.
3) Savings is used all the time, which means a bankrupted business. Either scenario above
= no profit. price is killed = no profit.
A system wherein price is eliminated, means a system where money is never used by
businesses. This is a communist state that uses money. Communism means consumer
commercial market = a vacation resort in the united states and no other country.
Bankrutpcy is death. Any regularity of savings = bankrutpcy. No other issue is concerned,
that is the law. Any other scenario is impossible. And that means the market is death. The
issue of fraudulent inflationary loans all the time, unrepayable on any level = death. That
sort of corruption is not allowed.
Businesses that could even afford to have a company, which is not happening, would be
rich companies that can afford massive prices relative to costs, but the time switch and
schism causes a problem - a siasmic effect and shift which prevent business. I dubbed this
the requisite a priori switch wherein inflationary money is injected before sales all the
time. That constancy kills the market possibility of any company on any singular basis.
This is not just a macroeconomic aggregate theory -- this is microeconomic. This
encompasses all the aspects as above so below. I am proving with this economic theory,
that aggregate systems are also the same in process and machiniery as severable systems.
Macrocosmic kaleidoscope equality with microcosmic aspects. The mathematics
PROVES this. Infinite dollars preclue the market. Currency pairs are not possible, and
that will be discussed further - there is only one currency.
So what you are seeing is that the majority of the market is poor businesses getting
funded fraudulently, and possibly only rich businesses as a tiny minority of 5 percent,
NOT 30 percent as I hypothesized too generously above. No, it is more like 0 percent.
That is not possible and makes no sense. The rich companies would take the retirement,
not the poor. Retired poor companies or middle class companies or even upper middle
class companies, whatever that means, are not possible. And the whole system is
destroyed on this premise. Poorer "companies" and "business owners" should on a
quotidian basis, turn the market over its head and enforce a revamp and indictments
criminally of all of these sinecures.
GOLD RECORD:
Now we must deal with gold and summarize other types of mediums of exchange besides
fiat currency and cash, which is the monopoly in this system. Ostensibly so anyway. The
fact is many are not even using money, since number one they are not real, and
secondarily, they are getting government subsidies of free things. A free for all for idiots
who can't physically work or think logically and scientifically, and in other aspects.
Gold is about accruing gold, which means that you would never barter your amount for
someone elses. Obtaining gold or silver, is not going to mean anything, unless there is a
medium of exchange usage of inflation to accrue massive amounts and apply it in regards
to currency. In this sense gold becomes fiat currency, it is just a different TYPE of
medium of exchange. Differing values accrued by variegated multiple parties is not going
to cause a possibility of trading these values for each other. I cannot trade you my 10
ounces of gold for your 1 ounces of gold. Bartering gold is the implication when people
think they can use gold as a superior form of currency. That is not the case, gold needs
constant inflation. The inflation can be relativized through breaking the chips of gold, but
you can also do that with gambling chips at Las Vegas or Atlantic City. You can break up
little bits of salt packets and do the same thing, from a big salt packet. The point is
inflation is necessary, you need a bank or loan shark miner, to dispense all that
inflationary gold to create a market of medium of exchange. It is a supplantation that is
parallel to fiat currency, but commentators pretend otherwise. So obtaining wealth with
gold requires a faucet dispenser of gold units usually through gold ious more than the
reserves of actual gold in the banks coffers. Those ramifications will be discussed in
future treatises or Youtube videos, on my website. But for now we can suffice to say that
gold requires infinite inflation, and using natural resources that would require an
impossible task - the resources would dwindle through mining. It would be too expensive
to mine, and it is pointless. It is just something that looks nice in the end, and as a
medium of exchange this beautiful talah, this object, is forced to just be equal to a penny
of silver from the treasuy department of the united states. It has no more intrinsic value,
this is proven through currency exchange of gold units. Paper money is always there. Its
toilet paper tradeable in gold units, and that's that. It was there before and after bretton
woods, and after richard nixon removed gold currency from the united states currency, or
prevented converting united states federal reserve notes to gold. So the whole gold and
silver market is a scam. Bitcoin would be the same, it's just amassing amounts of things
but trading them is not possible, so they just turn out to be currency dispensers, some
BASE for a currency amount you can dispense. Converting to that Gold just imagines a
higher wealth status, but toe to toe with dollar amount supply and demand, even fiat
alone can be sufficient. Backing a currency is all bullshit, it comes down to a
relativization of a dollar, yen, yuan, dinar, Riyal, ruble, to a source of numerial paper or
otherwise currency and unitization. They call that fiat currency. That is how all of it is
done otherwise it is bartering one value of that currency for another value which is
nonsensical, unless you are trying to get rid of your currency. I want to get rid of my gold
for your lesser value of gold ----wow, that is more like durress. That is not economics or
commerce.
Therefore gold is done. All medium of exchange requires inflationary systems, and that is
final. Gold does not cure inflation that is the real solution of this matter, and gold
transmutes to fiat currency quite readily and even otherwise, pure gold requires inflation.
That is never done, and no one ever had a bretton woods conference or otherwise with a
dick nixon. All specious fallacious history to prop up sinecures, as provable by the total
fraud and crimes of this system being perpetrated by consumers who are promoting
discrimination and chicanery against a minority racial group. A total apartheid of the
stupid, against the intelligent.
I started the inflation is used by the rich, and now I present a project I've been working on
for 4 years now and was the premise and thesis of Premeditated Inflation, Market
Disequilibrium, and Worldism: A World without Currency - that inflation is required for
the market - yet it is not possible because the market is corrupted by a thick juicy black
line that prevents any transactions with money outside of a minority of salaried
employees.
Any other money might be possible, but those people are not real scientifically or
organically.
GDP's are all fiction, numbers that represent strengths of currencies that have various
categories in numerical pairs in the foreign exchange market. Numbers should never
change for nominal amounts of sales in various industries in order to be adjusted for
inflation, that is not possible and makes no sense. Adjusting for inflation requires
comparing nominal amounts over time and using the later metric to adjust the former to a
different number. That never happens, and is not possible using the CPI formula.
Various nations with various Gross domestic products achieve nothing - those countries
are a lie and have no banks or commerce. G8 countries are a scam, and none of them are
achieving such massive sales in terms of endemic commerce that are high enough to be
considered erudite clinician scholars so advanced. That is a government largesse provided
to prop up sinecures, and it has a racial basis to it. In other words violations of the geneva
conventions and international law.
CPI is killed and Eliminated.
The market is killed and eliminated.
All mediums of exchange are killed and eliminated, including gold and bitcoin and silver.
Fiat currency is done for as well as central banking, and most of all the Federal Reserve
and its member banks.
Im going to further destroy the CPI:

The Consumer Price Index promotes a system where the real value of wealth
is presumed to change even despite the same nominal salary and wage. That
is what the equation promotes.
Real Wage = (Old Wage * New CPI) / Old CPI

The new CPI divided by the old CPI, produces a result that as we discussed
mathematically no matter how high the CPI gets which should always get
higher due to the inflationary set up, the fraction is always the same relative
to the previous CPI calculated amount. That means that the CPI never
changes, no matter what in any change of the week or otherwise. Based on
the principles of Mathematics. So this calculation is already flawed. As we
discussed the nominal amount staying the same means there should be no
change in real wealth. On top of that realization we are seeing some
problems with this equation. Why would you multiply the old wage by the
NEW CPI? That is a contradiction, the old CPI should be multiplied if anything
by the old wage, not the new CPI by the old wage. They are presuming there
is a change embedded in a number of the New CPI, as what they call a
COEFFICIENT, which is not even possible. Numbers dont represent some
reified change just by themselves, that would have to be represented by a
division or fraction. So coefficients are farcical to begin with mathematically
and economically and practically. What you have to consider is that using this
equation you can presume the changing value of the CPI in the same way as
you did changes in price baskets to calculate the CPI number. So this gives
the illusion of a changing value for the number that you achieve when you
divide the New CPI and Old CPI, yet that ends up being just a number unit. So
let us presume that the old wage is 6 dollars multiply by 6 and divide it by
three. The resulting number is 12 dollars as the real wage, for that 6 dollars.
So they are saying that since inflation increased by double that the real wage
increased??????????????????????? Using just one wage from the past, as a
nominal amount? That is not possible. The inflation increased how the hell are
you going to get one wage to have a higher real wealth? It is the same old
wage. Nothing about the wage changed based on the formula. It even goes
against the principle of relativization, wherein the nominal amount changes in
real wealth based on having the same amount, by using the nominal value
changes of other market participants in the economic system. The fact of the
matter is that there is no way to reconcile how a nominal wage can have a
higher real wealth based on an INCREASE in inflation. If anything the real
wealth should decrease, now the prices are higher and this wage is the same,
real wealth should GO DOWN. Higher prices versus my same wage. What a
contradiction that has somehow skipped the radar of so many PhD
economists! That in and of itself destroys this equation. Real wealth should
go down, not up. Higher inflation reduces the purchasing power of your wage,
so if the wage stays the same with higher prices, then your real wealth goes
down. There is no argument against that.

Back to the concept of reletivization of a parapley of wages vis a vis


one stagnant wage, we can now fully destroy the idea that nominal wealth
can change higher in real wealth or lower in real terms, based on salaries of
even other market participants as some idea in the sky. It doesnt even go
lower in terms of real wealth because fiat currency is unusable. There is
never any inflation, it is all loss I named this theorem Market Disequilibrium
(See Market Disequilibrium 2013). That is disproven by the theory in and of
itself. Secondarily, multiplying an old wage by the new CPI, makes no sense.
You are saying that an old wage needs to multiply by some arbitrary
calculation that in and of itself does not make sense, you do not multiply the
old wage by an amount to repeat the wage by that amount, what is that
going to even do? You are saying if the old wage is 6 dollars and the new CPI
is 6 that the amount is 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6, that makes no sense. There is
no basis to multiply that 6 dollars by 6 dollars. It is an arbitrary calculation
severably or holistically. So the total division produces the same result
because in the end you just get 2 dollars by 6 dollars, which is the same as
saying 2 dollars, the original wage added 2+2+2+2+2+2. That amount you
get ends up being, arbitrary since it just expands the nominal wage higher
and higher with no basis to do that given our other calculations about the CPI
and any ostensible fallacious differentials therein.

So the market on its own is a 0 sum game where inflation is required, yet it is
never achieved. There are arguments stating that inflation is a basis of
Consumer Price index averages, but we will thoroughly eviscerate this
concept. But contrarily there is an argument that inflation is a basis of money
being pumped into the system, irregardless of CPI. From there prices are just
creative imaginations or ideas supporting more precisely supply and demand
factor of investments and productivity, as well as product market demand.
Precisely also inflation would be a basis of the demand for each unit of
currency being reduced, therefore there would be a requirement of making
each product cost more in order to achieve a higher or equal real wealth than
before. Those calculations are supply and demand calculations, yet they do
not even need to occur, those are productive imaginations but also social
considerations to keep up with growing prices. Prices do not have to reflect a
higher ever growing effect on their own just based on units of currency losing
demand. That is a huge theorem I present to you eviscerating the notion
that prices automatically go up as the demand for each unit decreases per
higher supply of currencies in the system. So all those factors considered, we
can say that inflation ends up being not a CPI concept, which is completely
fallacious, but actually an imagination of tons of money being inputted in the
system through banks and lenders on ITS OWN. That on its own is inflation.
Yet as we know it does not work. At best it creates a FRAUD illusion.

So let us discuss CPI now as a basis for inflation. I thoroughly recognized CPI
as a basis for inflation being fallacious and facetious for a while now, and
organized my thoughts and writings on the basis of inflation being a product
of money transfers to the economic system.

What we will consider now is that the CPI on its own is not an accurate
calculation, to begin with, using the CPI formula. What you must consider is
that prices being based on a percentage of the population that is buying
those type of goods/services, is already absurd. That differentiation of a pie
of purchasers buying separate goods makes no sense. Multiplying the
percentage of the pie, for some average price and then adding each
respective percentage to get a total number is not accurate. The average
price theorem, is already specious. The best methodology for determining
price is not going to be averages, because averages will beget prices that are
not accurate when you have such a high differential for certain items. It might
produce a number theoretically that is distinguishable from some previous
average, but it will not represent the total price changes of the market. So,
using median would further not achieve a proper price tag. The best bet you
have is mode, and that might not be accurate regarding the total price of an
item as well, because some changes on the ancillary spectrum of prices
might suggest a different price tag, either lower or higher from the mode,
that is, the price most repeated in the line. So finally what you must consider
is that the price should be a guestimation of the market value of that
particular item, or group of items, using the whole pool of prices. The only
way to do that is through a survey and a guestimation calculation. There is no
other way to calculate that price, than by that method. Averages, imply
simply adding up all the amounts of prices, and dividing by the total amount
of prices. That will not give you the proper price for that category of items. If
you have prices too high anywhere on the spectrum, then your average will
not really calculate what the prices really are as a total. This can be shown
when you see that 5 million businesses have a price of 15 dollars, and every
other business has a price of 2 dollars for their items. When you have 30
million businesses, suddenly the average price does not even reflect remotely
the market value of the price of that good or service. 83 percent of the
market has total total price for their item they are selling, of 2 dollars, yet 17
percent of the market has a total price of 15 dollars for their item. To me the
average should not result in being 4 dollars or more, which is the calculation
you achieve using the average formula. Even using modes, you achieve
simply 2 dollars, which would be the case even if it were 51 percent 2 dollars
and 49 percent 15 dollars. Too many people would have 15 dollars as a price
tag for the item, for us to simply assume that 2 dollars is the market value
price on a generalized level, using modes for that item. So the best method
to use is guestimation process that will even provide multiple price tags for
this item, using cross sectional surveys of price tags. So this item here, a toy
car, will cost 15 dollars for 5 million of Americans, and 2 dollars for the 25
million Americans left. That is actually a proper method, because we will
prove percentages on this level do not operate properly using mathematics,
but that is for another book. But in this book we can tell that this method is
superior for calculations because that price tag is the only thing that each
one of those Americans could ever buy, since the market does not operate on
money to begin with, and it does not function so all you get is one item per
business to sell and that is designated precisely through this mechanism, that
each american gets that 2 dollar, or that 15 dollar item contrarily. Ultimately,
we must recognize that guestimation is the proper methodology, but here
this is barely even guestimation this is a proper survey. Guestimation is the
averages, and the means and the modes, which are principles that are not
accurate in mathematics or in economics. Those principles will be eliminated
further in another book, but here we will consider those destroyed in terms of
economics.

So the survey methodology is the only accurate system for the CPI, and that
would require further a GUESTIMATION of a general price tag for all goods,
not just severable goods split out here and there with percentages of people
who want to buy those goods. The problem with that model is this: what they
are trying to do is make each price tag into a fraction of 100, by multiplying
the percentage groups of people who buy these generalized prices,
immutable to one price, and then adding that total up to a number that is a
FRACTION of 100. The problem arrives when you see that this number has an
accretion, a gap that has not been filled inwhat number is
that?????????????? It is already still a fraction no matter what you achieve.
Yet it is a whole number. So the fraction is above and beyond the 100 percent
point. That is the basis of the flawed mathematics of today. Math today is all
about going above 100 percent, imagining some accretion above 100, that
implies also inflation, implies possibility of differentials and juxtapositions of
values of numbers. But if you see precisely that these percentages are not
accurate mathematically, you can further see how the CPI methodology is not
accurate as well. If you want to get a percentage of the population, using
percentages, you will not get an accurate result numerically. 25 over 30 is 83
percent when you multiply by 100 which is an arbitrary calculation used to
suggest a fraction over 100 percent, a UNIT with aggregate summation
divisions of a that unit. But at the same time you can divide 30 by 25, and
you get 120 percent according to that multiply by 100 calculus that is the
basis of mathematics today. However, that is a liberal interpretation of
mathematics that is not mathematical and mechanically precise. When you
divide 30 by 25, you are splitting the 30 into 25 sections. That means that the
percent is 1/25, or 4 percent using the multiply by 100 mechanism to
comport that number within a 100 percent total spectrum. 100 is the lucky
number in this mathematical liberal society, but here we apply that logic and
we get two different percents based on division. This disproves fractions, and
forces division to be at the forefront of the fractional mechanism. The truth is
that now you have 4 percent and 83 percent as two numbers that represent
this amount of people who are partaking in selling 2 dollar items, within the
30 million pool. You cannot even add those units of 1 fractions of 25, to
achieve 83 percent. That number will never be achieved using the units of 1,
so you get an infinite number, a decimal number over 25: 20.8333333/25.
This decimal over a denominator is a methodology which is not allowed in
mathematics, and also what you realize here is that the number is an infinite
number: 25.8333333333333333333333333333 goes on forever. That
destroys all mathematics to begin with, because mathematically it implies a
much higher number than the source number leftward or rightward, on any
individual numerical amount or decimal place, than the original number
provided. Infinity kills mathematics. Here based on all of these calculations,
the percentages achieved are wrong, and not mathematically precise, at best
poor guestimations. We can see that the calculations using division produces
two opposite results, and yet when we try to resolve those results through
computations and fractional comparisons, the number achieved is infinite and
there is no way to reconcile 83.3 percent with 4 percent. There is no
mathematical way to achieve this, yet division begets that requirement.
Having a percentage over 100 is not applicable, will never happen. So
considerations that 30,000,000/25,000,000,000, achieving a percent over
100 as they promote in current mathematics, that threshold of a higher
numerator vs. denominator, is not mathematically accurate. You never
achieve a percent over the whole unit, the unit is the max you get. And
frankly when you look at the infinite spectrum, and other mathematical
sabotages of the unit including percentage juxtapositions that force the
percents to be smaller than they actually are proportionally, and also even
enhance the unit to a higher number on a precision basis, then you will see
that fractions and percentages themselves are all equal. They are equal to 1
at best, and that 1 has no value because no other number is juxtaposed
higher or lower to it, and so all you get is 0. 0 means no number. It is not a
number, which has any mathematical worth. And therefore infinite achieves
an imagination, and any number is equal infinitely, as an imaginary unit of 1,
regardless of any decimal place.

Here we are done, but we have to focus on how it is a stupid idea to add up
these prices this way, it is a pseudo mathematical approach to a system of
surveys of prices vis a vis population cross sectional segregates, forced into a
compendium of bullshit numbers. Then those numbers are added yet you
dont even get a fraction, you get a bunch of overweight over 100 amounts
that you add up and divide to some previous summation. This problem of CPI
has been thoroughly destroyed. It just doesnt make sense, you need a
survey and guestimation of a price for the whole system, using an expert in
logical estimation. That number can then be divided by a prior logical
estimation. None of the pseudo mechanics of mathematics or economics
within the Consumer Price Index will achieve the proper result.

The real problem arrives is when you divide the two finalized numbers of the
aggregate market price. The number on the top is the current basket price,
and the number in the denominator is the previous basket price. Yet what you
will see is that No matter what the current basket price is, which according to
the current inflationary system should always go up, the fraction will always
be the same. That means that at best you get that fraction, based on the
previous amount, and there will never be any numerical change in the CPI
number. Therefore, comparing CPI numbers based on percentage changes
that you find in charts for February 2017 vs. March 2017, is not accurate
either, for the reason that the source number is flawed. Divisional comparison
mechanics as we discussed will prove that this method of percentages always
achieves the same result, so those months always have 0 percent inflation.

I think in the end we can also presume that any divisional change in
percentage from month to month that is 0 percent is utterly stupid. How can
you not have even a penny worth difference in prices when you have 350
million people and 29 million + businesses, it just makes no sense, how about
cents. The conclusion here is that any survey should account for some
change in prices to prevent a 0 percent inflation rate from a previous
relativized weekly or monthly point.

To quote Iron Sheik, CPI, I suplex you, I put you in a camel clutch, I break your
back, and then fuck your ass, to I make you humble. So you respect the Iron
Sheik.

That being said, we must consider how real wealth using the CPI formula
seems to change even if you made the same nominal wealth. Changes in real
wealth even presumably always mean aggregate and severable changes in
nominal wealth, using this CPI formula or any formula of a comparison of
changes in wages and salaries due to input of dollars. Hear we can see how
even CPI is based on increase in money and changes in aggregate money
supply, aka M1 M2 M3. So it is actually a presumed increase monetary model,
not just price change model. How do you change prices without input of
dollars. The presumption is that it is just a tick or tac lower or higher but in
reality,

There is this idea that prices can be adjusted but this is felonious. The fact of
the matter is that price adjustment necessitates more money into the
system, and as we discussed CPI requires more money in the system. More
money in the system always transfers the wealth from the rich to the poor,
the bank to the rich and the poor, however, is the precise designation. So the
idea that wealth transfer is from the rich to the poor, that is, rich people who
borrow money and do transactions to provide that money to poorer
businesses and employees is not accurate. Anyone espousing that does not
really see what is going on. The truth is that Inflation becomes SAVINGS, no
matter what, and we will discuss the ramifications of that further. Injection
viral money that is unrepayable, not proper investment business loans, but
purchasing consumer money, has to transfer even when it is received as
profits for businesses, as SAVINGS for that business. The reason is that those
profits are not possible to begin with, so profits should be profits, or
ostensible profits. A differential must be achieved in savings that prevents
the price from ever being the face value, by twice the price, but more
accurately an equal amount to the price + infinity. The infinite number
represents an infinite vat of savings that is required to make that happen,
and perhaps even selling at any point further at that HIGHER amount,
requiring more and more money to sustain the business. Contrarily in a no
inflation state, as we will discuss in this book, requires a reverse inflation that
will do the same thing to prices, through SAVINGS, to even allow businesses
to operate within the system as a total. The prices would have to decline
relative to loans or any vat of savings to ensure that differential. Loans are
secondary and arbitrary. There is a loans vs. price differential that is adjusted,
yet we realize that on a transactional basis new money is required to prevent
the USAGE of savings, and yet even then SAVINGS is required to protect the
use of savings when you HAVE NONE, which essentially kills price. Without
question the prices of all products become zilch, or two times the face value
amount through this process, with or without proper INJECTABLE positive
inflation. Even with no inflation you have inflation, called reverse inflation by
me, which is going to produce this result. So simply changing numbers of
prices is not possible because the whole system in severable or as aggregate
does not work on this basis. The market price market disequilibrium
differential upward that is part of the competition stratum, causes a break
down in that process.

Furthermore, it is important to note how deflation is the rule in


economics. The price has to infinitely be reduced for all businesses to provide
for that twice the price mechanism amount of savings for every transaction,
so imagine every business having billions of dollars in savings by the end of
the week, how about infinite amount of savings to operate. Transactional
infinites kill the possibility of a market. So in a no inflation state, you actually
achieve a reverse inflation that ends up being deflation, prices for all
business equally would have to go infinitely downward to .
000000000000000000000000000000000000001, etc., fractions of pennies
which are not even possible to be distributed by the department of treasury,
much less in the stupid movie Office Space. To quote Samir Iraninejad This is
a Fuck. It is also logistically impossible to in concert coordination reduce
prices in this manner. Yet it is still inflationary despite the deflation, an
inflationary relativized deflation, through SAVINGS to sabotage price to
infinite infinitesimal values. The infinitesimal book which talks about parties
in cathedrals or something using a book title to describe the infinite
possibilities in a line or whatever, makes no sense and you should not read it.
Math is logic, economics is based on math and numerics and also
probabilities of choice, but those can be reduced to pure numerical logistics.
The probabilities of choice or whatever, or mish mash ideas are not
applicable, negligible variables of an illusion. Finally we must see how even
with proper positive injected, numerically higher bank inflation, through
money pumping into the system, produces a system that seems to be
inflationary but when you consider how much savings you need, double what
the intake of what you get in return as profit, you will see that this is the
mechanism for the SABOTAGE. The savings becomes DOUBLE the market
price real profit, which in a natural healthy state would require a time
machine to use past profit to fuel current profits on a constant current infinite
basis. Thats what savings presumes to be, past profits, but if they dont exist
you immediately go bankrupt. Well the system automatically goes bankrupt,
because that savings turns to infinite and either way kills the market value of
your item: the price line is finished before it starts. That reversal of common
psychology is a SABOTAGE of the price and all use of money. This is a perfect
example of Market Disequilibrium, a negative differential, you lose more than
you gain: SAVINGS becomes the basis by which you provide for the profits
you attain, which are always less based on a MARKET PRICE value, so your
market price as a TOTAL which is already bisected by input cost and profit
margin, implying a differential higher than the input cost expenditure,
requires a SAVINGS that is one time extra of the total market price value.
That is a MARKET DISEQUILIBRIUM. Your profit at best is an input cost LOSS,
your whole market price: REAL PROFIT, I dubbed and titled.

The market is based on price fixing and owned and operated by the
government.

Keynes market equilibrium relating people to products and services


presented by businesses has been further destroyed. I destroyed this
theorem by john maynard keynes with my treatise in 2013 Market
Disequilibrium, wherein input cost must be met with a higher profit of market
price total, and that is the real disequilibrium of profit wherein what you pay
must be returned in market price that is higher than what you pay. That is an
inherent disequilibrium, no matter what the amount is higher. I pay 5 dollars,
I must get the 5 dollars back, plus 5 dollars or more. It is a system of
recieving a recoupment more than return.

Keynes was further destroyed herein by destroying the market and


keynesian graphs of equilibrium. With this treatise we learned that prices are
a product of salaries - meaning that there is no return for any business owner.
Government owns the companies, that means that, there is no profit. Money
is extraneous, a fiction. Medium of exchange is ruined. Money is only
something you can get as a minority group, through salaries working for
government controlled jobs. non profits, real 503(c) charitable organizations.
Salaries are possible, profit is not.

Keynes was destroyed to prove any business in a healthy spectrum


without fraud, just based on even a little hole, a tiny gap of fraud the
corrupted system does not work - can only produce one item of a waste of
goods/service, which is a salary with no sales, so no market price differential
of profit. That produces only an input cost which cannot cover even severably
a businesses monetary costs, or in aggregate a markets costs.
So this proves market equilibrium, which was a stupid ass specious
concept to begin with, wherein profit was ancillary to libertine liberal mass
sales matching production - this proves that production never works and is
always based on a numerical and mechanistic aspect that is ENDEMIC AND
IMMUTABLE TO THE MARKET - the market is always market disequilibrium. A
negative, a loss. Not even a ground zero, a flatline. It is a slope, a cascade
below zero, defeating the purpose of loans and business and that is why
loans and businesses do not occur.

What you have to realize is that the actual market does not end in one
buyer seller switch with the Buyer Seller cascade. The fact is that you can
have 12 businesses with Buyers and Sellers down the cascade priceline. That
will theoretically take 6 transactions plus the original transaction, in terms of
primary total transactions in one by one fashion in order to kill the market
into half higher sellers and half weaker buyers. This is actually VOLUME sales.
Buying and selling, in alternating switch fashion down the cascade multiple
times leads to multiple volume sales. It is an illusion. The market is based on
2 market participants, a buyer and seller company, which is bullshit (B.S.).

As you can see the amount of transactions allowed for all businesses
as a total in the primary market, is half of the amount of companies, plus the
original amount of companies (half of the finite business market + 1). In the
end you get Half Higher sellers and half weaker buyers that is a sellers and
buyers block. The weak link buyers kill the whole market. A chain is only as
strong as the weakest link. The domino effect is caused by this process.

What you have to see is, there is less amount of transactions for higher
sellers on the cascade. Let's use the example of 12 companies:

Down the B.S. cascade (we use the B.S. cascade instead of S.B.
cascade slope because the higher seller and weaker buyer are extraneous,
even producing less transactions totaling actually half the amount of
companies in the market) - the higher seller is locked from transacting as
between other companies, while the weaker buyer is thrown out with no one
to buy from in the market for products. Businesses must transact between
other businesses for products and services, that is why this immutability
forces the market to fail. It is that as between companies, there is no chance,
it is always a domino effect. There is no USAGE for money for companies that
are actually healthily operating. That means in a majority sense the whole
market fails for those that TRY to operate without fraud. As above so below,
in severable and in aggregate the market fails in a domino effect.

Sellers aggregate higher, and weaker buyers aggregate lower. The


ones that get to do multiple transactions are the buyers and sellers that
switch in between. The amount can variegate. In total within the market in 1
by 1 fashion, or 2 by 2 fashion (the market must always be even), the amount
of transactions in a total sense must always be half of the amount of
companies in the market.

Extraneous companies go bankrupt, they are siphened off. This is an


illusion. The reason why this happens in the market is because competition
between 2 companies kills the whole makret in an instant domino effect
where sales never happen to achieve profit. Companies have to buy from
OTHER companies, not from consumers. Consumers buttressing other
companies through fraudulent vertical sales will not save any one company
or all companies as a total. The fact is that companies die off because of
business that is guaranteed between companies, kills companies. Companies
are stuck in loss quibbles, loss occlusion and obstruction - ELIMINATION as a
result of companies transacting between each other.

The domino effect will always happen because at least one company is
stuck in constant loss as a result of the cascade of businesses conducting
supply and demand based sales and purchases. This loss means everyone
loses unless FRAUDULENT money supports each company through savings
and sales. However, there is a thin black line that cuts through this facade of
even FRAUD for every other company to keep the whole charade alive of
commerce with money. That is that when businesses conduct as between
each other, that creates a competition that kills the whole market, even when
fraudulent money supports those companies. That fraudulent money kills the
price, so that commerce from consumer fraudulent unrepayable transactional
infinite dollars does nothing to save the whole thing from being eliminated.

So price is destroyed and profit is destroyed. Money is destroyed


completely. The whole market is a loss factor with each of these primary
transactions, which are pretending to be able to have permutations or volume
sale transactions. It is only one for the whole market. That means that the
fraudulent money will only allow for money extraneous to profits endemic to
a healthy business that doesn't use fraud and only sales to subsist on a total
level, to do the same exact thing as if there was no fraud = fail. Cascades kill
the market, because profit requires those differentials. Profit is destroyed
either way, and fraud only defeats the purpose of business for the whole
market wherein no healthy business can exist, because they should be
retired. They have too much money that is double the amounts they make
per any price, because the price line ALWAYS fails. Transactionally, the price
line constantly, always fails. It is a total failed operation.

Any system is only as good as its weakest link, as the axiom goes, and
for the money market that is the same thing. This is why the government
must operate all companies. There is no room for even one single private
business owner.
Mathematically profit is not possible for even one single business, and
this illusion of permutations or volume sale transactions, has been fully
debunked to only impute mathematics with probabilities of human choice in
conducting business (Buying and Selling). This means that strictly
numerically, profit is not possible because input costs are not reimbursable
past the disbursement (market price = input cost), AT A MAXIMUM.

Permutations have been destroyed and all multiple transactions are


proven to be an illusion, sabotaged completely.

Raising market price will do nothing to change the logistics of the


cascade. Variegation in market prices on the price line for businesses (of
course), does nothing to change the result of the 2 by 2 system of failure,
wherein nothing is gained in sum in terms of money. Those companies will
only turn into notches of higher sellers, which would only place them
somewhere else on the cascade. Everyone else loses that is transacting, and
even then all the companies will lose holistically as between each other.

Prices being raised to thwart any process or suggest a variability in


prices will only lead to all prices being equal and no usage for money on a
constant basis. See the reasons discussed regarding differentials of price
above. a 1 to 1 transfer with no profit, actually, with bank loans loss, and no
possibility of commerce. 1 to 1 transfers make no sense = work put in for
work recieved. It might seem like it will work, but it won't. Paying your rent for
your business will require a higher price in return to pay for living expenses.
That is why it does not work, a huge theorem and postulate. This means
profit is required due to the bifurcation of expenses for business and living
costs. That is what prevents a business owner (the bedrock and substratum,
the basis of commerce not just consumption, okay?) from just putting in work
with a bank loan or stolen money, in order to get the same amount back all
the time. There has to be through dynamic commerce, a differential higher,
any slip up is a liability called savings bankruptcy. If you don't have the rainy
day savings, you are screwed. That is the majority rule. That is what
competitive price differentials achieve. Yet those differentials are not
possible.

Now let's look at the fact that the weakest link buyer is not the only
weak link somewhere in the hinterland of the commercial market, there are
also weak link sellers that die off naturally from supply and demand, and also
ironically, in the same way through the death of supply and demand, have no
customers that are business owner proxies or representatives of companies,
and thus die off and close off the market not just on the weak seller company
(profit margin wise) side, but from the higher side of profit margins. The
commercial market dies off as an accordion, it closes up and caves in.
This claustrophobic scenario does not allow for consumers, as
discussed thoroughly above, to maintain commerce with fraudulent money
(see the black hole of input costs, stock market and more), infinitely
transactionally. Consumers can do nothing to save the destruction of the
market. The L shaped loser dies both vertically, and horizontally, because
those lines are not possible to be drawn mathematically since there are
infinite holes, negative space, and accretions, in any line drawn on physical
reality in any medium or plane.

The market is eliminated and obstructed totally. That is the end.

The formula for repetitive volume sale transactions within any cascade
wherein there is this illusion, now disproven, of multiple transactions even
between Buyers and Sellers (B.S.). in the switch off, is

Total businesses in the closed set = half the amount businesses as a


total of transactions + 1 allowed on an aggregate and one to one basis.

Transactions = Tb = 1/2Tb + 1

If you were to see the market from the S.B. downward cascade, with a
weaker buyer indicating obvious failure since it has no company to buy from
(totally bankrupted company), then you there would only be Transactions =
Tb = 1/2Tb.

That is the finality of the market.

A closed set of cascades in the market through a probability gradient


naturally indicative of a cascade (transactions beget changes higher in prices
to maintain profit) means prices are drawn upward infinitely, with infinite
inflation to undue costs and disbursements with a higher recoupment, or
rather gain something from those input costs and not be on the street from
those failed investments. This can be mitigated with infinite market
participants, but that means the market does not work.

Breaking down prices means relative to input costs means in dynamic


sales transactions you will go out of business, and you will also not be able to
cover living costs as well - and it also leads to infintie price decline which is
logistically impossible and implies no possibility of profit.

Profit is always ever reaching higher, that means, you need positive
inflation (actual money flow into the economy from the banks and lenders,
printing money out of thin air). This treatise destroys the federal reserve. The
market is eliminated. Inflation of this kind or any kind (reverse deflationary
inflation) is to no avail, and the market never works without total percent
government control.
Volume sales and multiple transactions between any business and
another are not possible. The whole market is just B.S. (Buyer and Seller) =
Bull shit market. Not a bull market that people pretend to invest in stocks. IT
is a bum market of yuppie sinecures who have no jobs but pretend to.

Cascades naturally exist because you either afford a seller or don't.


Buyers rule the market, this is a consumer market not a production market,
giving more credence to the budget deficits and trade deficits in america
which make no sense suggesting america doesn't sell anything close to
having the world reserve currency or high Gross domestic product (emphasis
on gross). But it's the only market in the world. The fact is if your loan or
dollar amount as a buyer business buys from an equal cash amount priced
seller item, that amount is a cascade naturally. IT is a Buyer and seller down
the slope. If you have more it is also a cascade numerically, but the same
result ensues so both are equal. Buyers and sellers down the slope presume
for consumption. If you don't have as much as the seller down the slope, you
are a weaker buyer and the seller is higher, so that means the seller is higher
and the buyer is lower down the slope cascade, meaning there can be no
transaction. The buyer and seller switch is a natural aspect of the cascade,
and just having a buyer versus an affordable seller or an unaffordable seller
(S.B.) in the market, forces the market to have a cascade or slope. Cascades
are as natural as atoms or oxygen molecules attaching to each other as O2.

What you have to understand is that the permutations quibble for


probability choice and also numerics coalesces to the same conclusion. Both
use multiple transactions of buying and selling, to fill in gaps, in finite sets, to
create the imagination that each party can find another company somewhere
using permutations. Jumping on board wherever there's a company left. The
whole concept of buying from a new company, or selling to a new company.
But these permutations pretend to do both buying and selling - multiple
transactions and volume sales. So this probability choice mechanism and also
the buyer seller blockade down the slope cascade, is the same thing. Using
strict probabilities, the most absurd conclusions arrive. 3 businesses with
each company buying and selling to another company produces a possibility
of a closure within the set and repetitions as well implied. Yet that is total bull
shit, because it implies multiple transactions, when you only get one. Buy
from one, and sell from another. 2 companies, that's the only switch you get,
and it turns the damned thing off.

Buyers are the businesses that actually have the money here. Sellers
have inferential prices (market price is inferential, it can be attained only a
posteriorily and is always at 0 because it is never achieved and only an
imagination of infinity). Infinity is any number above 0. That can only be an
imagination because all numbers are equal and all price tags are equal.
Juxtaposition of 2 differing values in mathematics is not possible, an idea I
have proven already and will further discuss in my next book on
mathematics. So infinite is the maximum you can get, just like infinite
businesses, and that is impossible through profit and actual healthy business.
Surveys will prove this and the whole federal reserve will be exposed as not
being an actual bank at all, much less being the culprit. The real culprit will
be the people involved in a pseudo gratuitous fraud that the government is
going to castigate and vituperate thoroughly by the law of the land the
United States Constitution and all applicable federal, state, and international
laws.

So what this means is that the only time the cascade works as
between 2 businesses (sellers inherently), is when price of buyer (amount
that the business owner is willing to sell) and seller's price tag are equal. So
the cascade is actually Buyer being 4 dollars and the Seller being 4 dollars.
When it adjusts the accretion higher will be 8 dollars as a seller and the buyer
will be 4 dollars, who subsequently attained the 4 dollars for the market
price. That is a Seller higher, and weaker buyer who cannot afford. What this
means is that we have a consumer market. Only Buyers make the decisions,
for inferential market prices that are never attainable for inflation = profit.

Prices will always be twice the tag amount based on hypothetical


approach, preventing further transactions besides the whole market splitting
infinitely because half of the market has to use fraudulent money to pay the
other half of sellers higher - that is twice the amount no matter what, in input
costs based on the market price at any moment for any business. Market
price is further proven to always be twice the tag amount, but the precise
amount is never quite ascertainable. Even an accretion of a penny more for
input costs in savings will not help one single business to do business
properly. This theory works for macroeconomics and micro = the same thing.
Any stratification of this field is pointless and useless.

This is dedicated to my mother J, my father M, my wrestling hero


Khosro Vaziri, Mason Ameri, Aziz Kobra Ameri my grandfather (R.I.P.), my
beloved TA and KA. My aunt Soudabeh Ameri.

I love my favorite bands Megadeth and Lars from Metallica, and my


favorite wrestler and the best wrestler in the world Iron Sheik, and most of all
my favorite band ever Nasty Savage.

The END.

You might also like