Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a
Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, P.O. Box 36, Monash, Vict. 3800, Australia
b
Centre for Advanced Research of Energy Technology, Hokkaido University, N13-W8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060 8628, Japan
Received 29 June 2004; received in revised form 14 December 2004; accepted 26 December 2004
Available online 22 February 2005
Abstract
Sugar cane bagasse and cane trash were pyrolysed in a novel quartz uidised-bed/xed-bed reactor. Quantication of the Na, K,
Mg and Ca in chars revealed that pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, valence and biomass type were important factors inuencing
the volatilisation of these alkali and alkaline earth metallic (AAEM) species. Pyrolysis at a slow heating rate ( 10 K min 1) led to
minimal (often <20%) volatilisation of AAEM species from these biomass samples. Fast heating rates (>1000 K s 1), encouraging
volatilechar interactions with the current reactor conguration, resulted in the volatilisation of around 80% of Na, K, Mg and Ca
from bagasse during pyrolysis at 900 C. Similar behaviour was observed for monovalent Na and K with cane trash, but the
volatilisation of Mg and Ca from cane trash was always restricted. The dierence in Cl content between bagasse and cane trash
was not sucient to fully explain the dierence in the volatilisation of Mg and Ca.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0960-8524/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.014
157 D.M.
D.M.Keown
Keown
et et
al. al.
/ Bioresource
/ Bioresource
Technology
Technology
9696
(2005)
(2005)
15701577
15701577 157
1 1
systems using biomass (Nielsen et al., 2000), the AAEM 1997) and brown coal (Quyn et al., 2002a)] indepen-
species retained in char during pyrolysis are impor- dently during pyrolysis, this poses a question as to
tant catalysts for the gasication/combustion of char whether Cl in biomass would indeed facilitate the
(Raveendran and Ganesh, 1998; Zolin et al., 2001), help- volatilisation of K or other AAEM species during
ing to reduce the gasication temperature and thus pyrolysis.
increasing the overall gasication process eciency and With the preferential release of Cl during the pyroly-
process economy. The volatilised AAEM species may sis of biomass (Jensen et al., 2000; Olsson et al., 1997),
also act as catalysts for the steam reforming of volatiles K must have been bonded to the char matrix. In fact,
in the gas phase (Hosokai et al., 2004). Clearly, the devel- as will be shown in this study, there is often not enough
opment of a biomass gasication process would require a Cl to account for the AAEM species, or even just K, in
good understanding of the volatilisation of AAEM spe- biomass. In other words, a signicant proportion of
cies during the pyrolysis of biomass in order to take AAEM species exist in biomass in forms other than
advantage of the special thermochemical properties of chlorides. Furthermore, signicant amounts of Ca and
biomass. Mg also exist in biomass as the essential nutrients for
Annual biomasses often contain much higher concen- the growth of the biomass. Very little is known about
trations of Cl than coal. Because the Cl and high pro- the volatilisation of these non-chloride AAEM species
portions of AAEM species (particularly K) in biomass during pyrolysis.
are water soluble, simple leaching/washing can remove The purpose of this study is to investigate the volatil-
large fractions of both alkali metals (in most cases isation of AAEM species during the pyrolysis of bio-
>80% of K and Na) and Cl (>90%) from biomass (or mass. Two biomass samples were chosen in this study:
char) and therefore has been considered as a means of a sugar cane bagasse sample and a cane trash sample.
mitigating the problems caused by the volatilisation of Both bagasse and cane trash are considered as impor-
AAEM (particularly K) (Davidsson et al., 2002; Dayton tant potential renewable energy sources. A novel
et al., 1999; Gabra et al., 2001; Jenkins et al., 1996; uidised-bed/xed-bed reactor was used to study the
Jensen et al., 2000, 2001; Mojtahedi and Backman, pyrolysis of these biomass samples, providing insights
1989; Olsson et al., 1997; Turn et al., 1998, 2003). into the mechanisms of the volatilisation of AAEM
While it is often agreed that K contained in biomass species during the pyrolysis of biomass.
is released into the gas phase mainly as KCl during
pyrolysis and gasication of biomass (Dayton et al.,
1995; Olsson et al., 1997), the detailed mechanisms re- 2. Experimental
main unclear, often contradicting with results such as
volatilisation of a portion of Cl preferential to K (Jensen 2.1. Biomass samples
et al., 2000) and volatilisation of Cl mainly as HCl
(Bjo rkman and Stromberg, 1997). The ratio of K Sugar cane bagasse and cane trash samples were pro-
and Cl in biomass appears to aect the volatilisation vided by the Sugar Research Institute. The properties of
of K and Cl (Gabra et al., 2001; Jensen et al., 2000, these biomass samples are shown below in Tables 1 and
2001; Mojtahedi and Backman, 1989; Olsson et al., 2. The chlorine contents shown in Table 2 were deter-
1997). In agreement with Olsson et al. (1997), Jensen mined using a slightly modied Eschka method (Chak-
et al. (2000) showed two steps in the volatilisation rabarti, 1978; Quyn et al., 2002a). The sugar cane was
of Cl: grown in Queensland, Australia. The sugar cane bagasse
200400 C and 700900 C. Signicant amounts of K has been washed/leached with water at an elevated tem-
were only released above 700 C. Previous results (Quyn perature during the extraction of its sugar. In contrast,
et al., 2002a) on the pyrolysis of a NaCl-containing Vic- the cane trash sample has high contents of AAEM spe-
torian brown coal also showed that the release of Na cies and Cl. The bagasse and cane trash samples were
and Cl took place independently and not as NaCl mole- air-dried and pulverised using a Bauer rener and sieved
cules during pyrolysis. As Cl and K may volatilise from repeatedly to a particle size range of 125250 lm.
solid fuels [biomass (Jensen et al., 2000; Olsson et al.,
Table 1
Proximate and ultimate analyses of the biomass samples used in this study
Biomass type Particle size range (lm) Ash yield (wt% db) [0.1] Ultimate analysis (wt% daf)
C [0.3] H [0.1] N [0.05] S [0.03] Oa
Bagasse 125210 6.9 49.7 6.1 0.31 0.04 43.8
Cane trash 125210 7.6 49.5 6.1 0.31 0.08 44.0
a
Oxygen calculated by dierence.
Table 2
Contents of AAEM species and Cl in the biomass samples used in this study
Biomass type AAEM content (wt%, db) Cl content (wt%, db) [0.005] K:Cl atomic ratio [0.1]
Na [0.005] K [0.005] Mg [0.005] Ca [0.005]
Bagasse 0.057 0.174 0.104 0.095 0.027 5.9
Cane trash 0.043 0.525 0.185 0.368 0.176 2.7
2.2. Pyrolysis installed in the freeboard. The frit prevented char elutri-
ation during pyrolysis so that the volatilised AAEM spe-
Pyrolysis of the biomass samples was carried out cies and the parent char were separated at the reaction
using a quartz uidised-bed/xed-bed reactor (Fig. 1) temperature. The elutriation of char out of the reactor
heated with an external furnace. This reactor system would have led to the re-condensation of the volatilised
was originally developed to examine the volatilisation AAEM species on the char surface at temperatures
of AAEM species during the pyrolysis of Victorian lower than the pyrolysis temperature, causing major
brown coal (Quyn et al., 2002a). A 160 g bed of acid- errors in the quantication of the true volatilisation of
washed zircon sand (150180 lm) was uidised with AAEM species. The presence of the frit in the freeboard
ultra high purity (>99.999%) argon. The reactor could also allowed the elutriated char particles to be held
be operated in either fast or slow heating modes. In underneath the frit, subsequently forming a thin xed
the fast heating rate mode, biomass particles were en- char bed. Therefore, the reactor had features of a ui-
trained in a feeder and fed at a nominal rate of dised-bed reactor (e.g. fast heating rates) and of a
1
75 mg min via a water-cooled injection probe directly xed-bed reactor.
into the hot sand bed which was maintained at the de- When the reactor was operated at the fast heating
sired experimental temperature. Biomass particles were rate mode, after about 2 g of biomass had been fed into
3 4 1
heated at a rate in excess of 10 10 K s , based on the reactor (actual mass of the fed biomass was accu-
the estimation by Tyler (1979) for a similar reactor. rately determined later), the reactor was lifted out of
Due to the brous nature and elongated shape of the the furnace and brought to room temperature by natural
biomass particles, the 1/8 in. diameter of the water injec- cooling. The argon gas continuously owed through the
tion probe (Quyn et al., 2002a) was increased to 1/4 in. reactor to prevent any char oxidation during quenching.
diameter to avoid biomass blockages during feeding. The ow rates of the uidising and feeding argon gas
The reactor design in this study (Fig. 1) diered from were controlled by mass ow controllers. The total ow
1
a normal uidised-bed reactor in that a quartz frit was rate was constant at 4.31 l min (at room temperature)
for all experiments.
Fluidising gas The light tars and condensable gases that were pres-
ent in the volatiles were absorbed using two absorption
Biomass bottles (containing 0.1 M NaOH) connected in series to
particles the exit of the reactor. This arrangement was sucient
for the collection of all Cl (likely as HCl) and light carb-
ption
oxylates/carboxylic acids in the volatiles (Quyn et al.,
To absor
Water- 2002a,b).
bottles
cooled
In contrast, in the slow heating rate mode, the bio-
probe mass particles were fed into the reactor (with sand) at
room temperature and the reactor was heated slowly
1
(nominally 10 K min ) to the desired temperature,
Char which was maintained for 15 min before cooling.
particles
Vol atiles In all experiments, the char yield was determined by
weighing the reactor and biomass/char before and after
Quartz frits the experiment.
heating rate resulted in less than 3 wt% (db) additional pyrolysis: the biomass samples had moisture contents
weight loss for both biomass samples. in equilibrium with ambient atmosphere (the moisture
contents were determined and considered in the char
yield determination). This moisture inherently present
100
in the biomass samples would have been driven out of
(4A) Cane trash the biomass as steam, gasifying the nascent char.
80
Slow heating rate Indeed, the observed char yields at the fast heating rate
60 Fast heating rate decreased with increasing temperature due to the inten-
40 sication of these self-gasication reactions.
20
Thirdly, soot formation and destruction could also
have aected the observed char yields, particularly at
0 the fast heating rate. Soot formation could occur as
80 (B) Bagasse the volatiles passed through the thin char bed held
Slow heating rate
60 Fast heating rate underneath the frit in the freeboard. It is believed that
40
the possible soot formation may have partially oset
the eect of heating rate on the char yield, leading
20 to the insensitivity in char yield with heating rate at
0 around 400600 C. However, at high temperatures
300 400 500 600 700 800 9001000 (>600 C), the thermal cracking of soot would intensify
Pyrolysis Temperature [C] and the in situ reforming of volatiles (Hosokai et al.,
Fig. 2. Char yields from the pyrolysis of (A) cane trash and (B) 2004) by steam would have minimised the soot forma-
bagasse as a function of temperature and heating rate in the uidised- tion on char particles. The reforming reactions are likely
bed/xed-bed reactor. to be catalysed by the AAEM species volatilised into the
gas phase (see later) or retained on char surface. Data on 100
Victorian brown coal (Li et al., 2004), which produces 80
volatiles that are more aromatic and thus of higher soot-
60
ing propensity than the volatiles from biomass, did show