AerobicDigestionforthe21st Century

PresentationOverview

AboutAerobicDigestion
AerobicDigestionImprovements
AerobicDigestionintheRealWorld

2
DigestionExpertise
WEFTEC1997 2001

AEROBIC
DIGESTION
WORKSHOP
VOL III 1999
CD-ROM

Fine Tuning
AEROBIC the Controlled
Aerobic Digestion
DIGESTION Process
WORKSHOP
VOL I 1997

The Challenge
Of Meeting
Class B
While Digestin g
Thicker Slu dges

3
DigestionExpertise
MOP11OperationofMunicipalWWTP

VolumeIII:
SolidsProcesses
Chapter31:
AerobicDigestion
Author:
ElenaBailey

4
DigestionExpertise
MOPNo.85th Ed.,2009DesignofMunicipalWWTPs

VolumeIII:
SolidsProcessingandManagement
Chapter25:Stabilization
Section3:AerobicDigestion
Author:MiguelVera

5
 AboutAerobicDigestion

6
WhatisAerobicDigestion?

AerobicDigestionisaprocessto:

1.Reducethequantityofsludgefordisposal.
Bacteriacontinuemetabolismastheydointheliquid
processbutwithoutnewfoodtheyusetheirown
biomass(endogenousrespiration).

2. Stabilizethesludgesothatitissaferforhuman
contact,doesnotattractvermin(vectors),andodors
arereduced.
7
WhenisAerobicDigestion
typicallyused?
1. Whenitisrequiredbylocalregulatoryagencies
2. Whenthefacilitywillbelandapplyingtheir
biosolidsandneedstomeetClassBrequirements.
3. Whenthefacilitywantstoreducethevolumeof
sludgeforfinaldisposal
4. Whenthereareconcernsaboutodors
5. Whenthereisnoprimarysludge(thinkBNR)

8
PlusesandminusesofAerobic
Digestion
Pluses
1. Inherentlysaferthananaerobicdigestion
2. Lowercapitalcostcomparedtoanaerobicdigestion
3. Easeofoperation
Minuses
1. Higherenergycosts
2. Temperaturesensitive

9
AerobicDigestionChemistry

AerobicDigestionisabiologicalprocess
similartoActivatedSludge.

ActivatedSludge=Growth
AerobicDigestion=Decay

Processcontrolisrequiredtomaintain
healthybiomass

10
 BiologicalProcesses

1.Digestion:
C5H7NO2 +5O2 =4CO2 +H2O+(NH4HCO3)
Biomass AmmoniumCarbonate

2.Nitrification:
NH4+ + 2O2=H2O+2H+ + NO3
AmmoniaAcid Nitrate

3.DigestionwithNitrification:
C5H7NO2 + 7O2 =5CO2 +3H2O+HNO3
Biomass NitricAcid
11
 BiologicalProcesses

4.DigestionwithNitrification:
C5H7NO2 + 7O2 =5CO2 +3H2O+HNO3
Biomass NitricAcid

5.Denitrification:
C5H7NO2 + 4NO3 +H2O=NH4+ + 5HCO3 + 2N2
Biomass NitrateAmmoniaNGas
Alkalinity

6.CompleteNitrification/Denitrification:
C5H7NO2 +5.75O2 =5CO2 +3.5H2O+0.5N2
Biomass NGas
12
Factorsaffectingtherateof
digestion:

1. Temperature

2. pH

3. Stabilityofthesludge

4. Biologicaldiversity
TraditionalDigesterDesign
PriortoClassBRequirement
10 20DaysSRT(M&E,1991)

MixingAir 30scfm/1,000cf

NoPerformanceRequirements

14
503RegsChangetheGame

15
AerobicDigestion Regulatory
Requirements
40CFRPart503
1. ClassBwithrespecttoPathogens:
60Days@15Cor40Days@20C
OR
Pathogens2,000,000CFU

2. ClassBwithrespecttoVectorAttractionReduction
VolatileSolidsReduction38%
OR
SOUR1.5mg/LO2
16
AerobicDigestion Regulatory
Requirements(cont.)
60%
VSS Destruction (%)

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Temp-SRT (deg. C-day)

17
AerobicDigestionChemistry

18%OxygenSavings:
3.DigestionwithNitrification:
C5H7NO2 +7O2 =5CO2 +3H2O+HNO3

Versus

6.CompleteNitrification/Denitrification:
C5H7NO2 +5.75O2 =5CO2 +3.5H2O+0.5N2

18
AerobicDigestionChemistry

pHCycle:

1.Digestion:(pHUP)
C5H7NO2 +5O2 =4CO2 +H2O+NH4+ +HCO3

2.Nitrification:(pHDOWN)
NH4+ +2O2=H2O+2H+ +NO3

4.Denitrification: (pHUP)
C5H7NO2 +4NO3 +H2O=NH4+ +5HCO3 +2N2

19
AerobicDigestionChemistry

NitrogenCycle:

1.Digestion:
C5H7NO2 +5O2 =4CO2 +H2O+NH4+ +HCO3

2.Nitrification:
NH4+ +2O2=H2O+2H+ +NO3

4.Denitrification:
C5H7NO2 +4NO3 +H2O=NH4+ +5HCO3 +2N2
AerobicDigestionTemperature

OptimumRange:20C 30C

Rate(10C) Rate(20C)

Nitrificationstopsat 5C
TechniquestoImproveProcess
Performance

1. SeriesorBatchOperation
2. SludgeThickening
3. Aerobic&AnoxicOperation
4. TemperatureControl
5. OperationalFlexibility

22
 1.Series/BatchOperation

Advantages:

Reducesshortcircuitingofpartiallydigested
sludge

Requires50%lessvolumetoachievesame
volatilesolidsreduction

23
Series/BatchOperation

Clyde,OH2.5MGDWWTP
2.Thickening

Advantages:

Smallerdigesters

Lessdigestedsludge

Highersludge
temperature

25
Thickening
Total Digester Solids Concentration

2.5

2
Percent Solids

1.5

Previous Maximum
Concentration = 1.1%
1

Hauling Cost Hauling Cost Hauling Cost

Savings Savings Savings
0.5
40% 60% 60%

0
3/24/2004 4/3/2004 4/13/2004 4/23/2004 5/3/2004 5/13/2004 5/23/2004 6/2/2004 6/12/2004 6/22/2004 7/2/2004 7/12/2004
Date of Measurement
3.Aerobic/AnoxicOperation

Advantages:

ReduceO2 requirementsby18%

Preservealkalinity

Reducetotalnitrogen

27
Aerobic/AnoxicOperation

Bellville,TX0.95MGDWWTP
EffectofAO/AXonVSR

T=20C,SRT=10d

Ref.:I.AlGhusain,et.al.,EnvironmentalTechnology,Vol.25,
2004
 4.TemperatureControl

Advantages:
Increaseddigestionrate

Maintainshealthybiomass

Providesconsistentoperationand
performanceyeararound

30
EffectofTemponVSR
SRT=10d
AnoxicCycle=8hr

Ref.:I.AlGhusain,et.al.,EnvironmentalTechnology,Vol.25,
2004
 5.Flexibility

Designsshouldincorporatethefollowingas
muchaspossible:

Abilitytocontrolsludgethicknessin
digesters

Abilitytocontrolairflowtoeachbasin

AbilitytomonitorpH,DO,&T

32
 AerobicDigestionImprovements

33
EffectsofThickeningonAeration

1. Loweringofalphavalues

2. Mixingisasimportantasaeration

3. Seasonalthinning maybenecessary

6/13/2014
ProductFeatures

35
AboveWaterOrificing
EaseofAccess

37
TheDiffuserinAction

38
ImprovedMixingAbility

39
OxygenTransferEfficiency

Diffuser Performance Curves

TransMax and MS
16%
TransMax
MS
14%
Oxygen Transfer Effeciency

Airflow Rate:
12% 15-25 scfm/diffuser

TM
10%

MS
8%

6%

4%
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Submergence Depth (ft)

40
 TankGeometry
Abilitiesofthesingledropdiffusermustbekeptinmind

1.Oxygentransferefficiencyimproveswithdepth

2.Mixingabilityincreaseswithdepthaswell

3.Varyingsidewaterdepthscanbeproblematic
forsheartubes,blowers,and
headerarrangements

6/13/2014
 GTADProcess

GTAD
standsfor:

GravityThickenedAerobic
Digestion

42
GravityThickener

43
AerobicDigester

44
WorkingTogether

45
GTADProcessFlow

1
PreMix

1.WastesludgeispumpedintoPremix
GTADProcessFlow

1
PreMix

Gravity
Thickener

2.SludgeflowsintoGravityThickener
GTADProcessFlow

1
PreMix 4
2 InLoop
Digester
Gravity
Thickener 3

3.ThickenedsludgeairliftedintoDigester
4.NitrifiedsludgeoverflowsintoPremix
GTADProcessFlow

1
PreMix 4
2 InLoop
Digester
Gravity
Thickener 3

6
5.ScumairliftedintoDigester
6.Supernatantreturnedtoheadofplant
GTADProcessFlow

1
PreMix 4
Isolated 2 InLoop
Digester Digester
Gravity
Thickener 3

7 6

7.ClassBsludgeremovedfordisposal
 GTAD
BatchOperatingCycle

DIGESTER#1 DIGESTER#2CYCLE
CYCLE
FeedStage BatchStage
Day1 2FillDigester#1 Day1 12Isolation
Day3 14InloopThickening Day13 14DrawDown

BatchStage FeedStage
Day15 26Isolation Day15 16FillDigester#2
Day27 28Drawdown Day17 28InloopThickening
 GTADProcess

GTADInstallationReferences
Design Plant
Location Commission Date
Flow Configuration
Stockbridge, GA 1.5 MGD SBR 2002
Belleville, TX 0.95 MGD Complete Mix 2002
Clermont, FL 2.0 MGD Oxidation Ditch 2002
Gardner, KS 2.5 MGD Oxidation Ditch 2003
Woodland, WA 1.3 MGD SBR 2003
Myrtle Creek, OR 2.9 MGD Oxidation Ditch 2004
Shelton, WA 2.5 MGD Oxidation Ditch 2004
Amherst, OH 6.1 MGD Oxidation Ditch 2004
Blue Mtn. Lake, PA 0.14 MGD RBC 2004
Brenham, TX 3.55 MGD Complete Mix 2004

52
 MTADProcess

MTAD
standsfor:

MechanicalThickened
AerobicDigestion

53
 MTADProcess
AIR AIR AIR

OPTIONAL DIGESTER 1 DIGESTER 2

STORAGE

MECHANICAL
THICKENER

REDUCE VOLATILE ENSURES

VOLUME SOLIDS PATHOGEN
REDUCTION REDUCTION

ThePADMprocessis
Anenhanceddigestionprocesstoachieve
guaranteedClassB biosolids
withconventionalequipment
inareducedvolume,
54
usinglessenergy.
 MTADProcess
RawSludge
MechanicalThickener
Filtrate

ThickenedSludge

AerobicDigesterNo.2 AerobicDigesterNo.3
AerobicDigesterNo.1

OptionalCoverforTemp.
Ctrl. ClassBDigestedSludge

55
DiffuserswithShearTubes

6/13/2014
DiffuserswithDraftTube

6/13/2014
 MTADProcess

M ITADnstallation References
Design Plant
Location Thickening Method
Flow Configuration
Clyde, OH 1.9 Oxidation Ditch GBT
Los Lunas, NM 0.7 Extended Aer. GBT
Paris, IL 1.4 1 & 2 Sludge GBT/BFP
Myrtle Beach, SC 12.6 Ext. Aer. & RBC RDT
Sanford, FL 7.2 Extended Aer. GBT
Lynden, WA 1.8 Oxidation Ditch RDT
Warsaw, IN 3.9 Oxidation Ditch GBT
Burlington, IA 7.6 C.A.S. DAF

Idealfor:
LargerWWTPs
Conversionofexistinganaerobicandholdingtanks
58
 BellefonteMTADProcess
RotatingBiologicalContactorfollowedbyMTADProcess
Engineer: Nittany Engineering
History:
ObjectivewastoproduceClassB
biosolids forlandapplication
Retrofitofequalizationbasininto
threeaerobicdigestersinseries.
PADMprocessdesignedforsolids
loadingincreasefrom2MGDto3.2
MGD.
Thickeningto4%solidswas
requiredtomeetClassBcriteria
withouthavingtobuildadditional
tanksat3.2MGDflow.

59
 BellefonteMTADProcess

60
 BellefonteMTADProcess

LongerSRTfromthickeningcomplimentedby
outstandingtemperaturecontrolresultsin
61 outstandingVSreduction
 BellefonteMTADProcess
PathogenData
First Quarter 2010
Rep Number CFU/Dry Gram
1 175
2 4,715
3 934
4 173
5 1,117
6 970
7 5,048
Geometric Mean 956
Third Quarter 2010
Rep Number CFU/Dry Gram
1 2,360
2 2,785
3 164
4 976
5 179
6 602
7 <59
Geometric Mean 480
62
Second Quarter 2010
Rep Number CFU/Dry Gram
1 268
2 704
3 1,622
4 1,679
5 2,370
6 2,647
7 414
Geometric Mean 1,040
Fourth Quarter 2010
Rep Number CFU/Dry Gram
1 268
2 83
3 380
4 269
5 633
6 10,400
7 <57
Geometric Mean 364
 MemTADProcess

MemTAD
standsfor:

MembraneThickenedAerobic
Digestion

63
 MemTADProcess

CombinesaMembraneThickeningTankwithtwo
AerobicDigesters
GuaranteedClassBBiosolids
Capableofbetween3%&5%solids
Nopolymerrequiredorattentiontodecanting
Continuousthickening independentofwasting
schedule
Reusequalitypermeate

64
MEMBRANETECHNOLOGYOVERVIEW

65
Definitions

FLUX:Therateoffiltrationperunitareaof
membranematerialiscalledflux.

TMP:Thepressuredifferenceacrossamembrane
duringfiltrationiscalledtransmembrane
pressure(TMP).

PERMEABILITY:TheratiooffluxtoTMPisreferred
toaspermeability.
TMP

FM
G P
Suction method
Constant discharge

Constant Level

Pressurewhenpermeatesuspended
Pressurewhenpermeatingtime
Headlossinpiping(Friction,fittings,etc)
=TMP
MembraneCartridges

Chlorinated Polyethylene membrane;

ultrasonically welded to both sides of an ABS
plate
70
MembraneThickenerData

Nominalporesize0.4micron,effectivepore
size0.1micron
Effectivefiltrationarea8.6ft2 to15.1ft per
cartridge
MBTDesignflux5gfd @20 C
MBTCrossflowvelocityis2.25ft/sec

71
 SubmergedMembraneUnit(SMU)

Manifold Tubes

Membranecase

Membranecartridges

Diffusercase
Diffuser

72
 PhysicalResponsibility
DesignofTheSubmergedMembraneUnit(SMU)

Actslikeanairliftpump
ContinuousCoursebubblesatthebottom
Fullyenclosed
Airscourinconstantcontactwithmembrane
throughfullrangeoftravel
Continuousmovementofmixedliquor,keeps
tankcontentswellmixedandinsuspension

73
Biofilm Basics
Allsubmergedmembraneshaveabiofilm.
Whatisabiofilm?
Acomplexdynamicmatricescomprisedofmicroorganisms,
EPS/SMP,nonbiologicalsolids,substrates,metabolites,
interiorporesandchannels
Whatdobiofilmsdo?
Createadensesecondarymembranethatcanallowfor
enhancednutrientremovalanddegradationofrefractory
organics
Whydowecare?
Biofilmsserveastheprimaryfilterandrepresentachanging
resistancetofiltrateflow(affectsplantops.)
 Biofilm Conditions

Ideal NonUniform
Thick

Stable
VariableTMP
HighTMP
IncreasedTMP
TMP

75
TheBiofilm(ADynamicMembrane)
Permeate

Servesasprimaryfiltering
mechanism(0.1m)

Biofilmcontroliskeyto
membraneperformance
inmixedliquor
(biohydraulics)

MLSS+Air(Cross
Flow)
TypesofMembraneFouling

adsorption poreclogging particledeposition

A:macromoleculesonmembranematrix
B:macromolecules(aggregates)andcelldebris
C:notseriousifcellsalone;seriousw/interstices
filledbyEPS(ExtracellularPolymericSubstances)
Biofouling
InUFMembranes(Choiet.al.,2005)
BiofilmManagement

AirScouring
Therisevelocityofbubblesimpactsshearforceand
boundarylayerthickness
Risevelocityisafunctionofflowrate,geometryandflow
resistance
Intensityrequirementisafunctionofdepositionrate(flux)
andfluidviscosity
Definedairflowpathwayspromoteevendistribution
Turbulentvelocity(slugflow)maximizeseffect
AirScour

Ideal

StableTMP(RC)
HowdoesSMUAirScourwork?

Continuouscrossflowofmixedliquorandair
maintainsoptimumbiofilmthickness
81

81
 ChemicalCleaning(CIP)

MaintenanceCleaning RecoveryCleaning
Intendedtoremovesurface(biofilmor Intendedtodislodgeparticles
cake)fouling.1 frommembrane
Doesnotinvolvetakingtanksoutof microstructure.1
serviceforextendedperiodsoftime Maytakefrom>424hrs.
(~14hr) Requiresthatmembranesbe
Routineprocedure soakedinconcentratedchemical
CanreturntoMBRfiltrationmodein solution.
~15minutes Generallyanonroutine
procedure

1 Membrane Systems for Wastewater Treatment, WEF 2006.

82
82
 CIPStrategies
10.0
R R = Recovery Cleaning (~24hr)

M M = Maintenance Cleaning (~2hr)

5.0
Others

M
EQ
0.0
1 year
EnviroquiputilizesMaintenanceCleaningonly(noRecoveryCleaning)toaddress
irreversiblefouling.
OperatingatlowTMP minimizesdeepporefoulingandextendsmembraneservice
life.
Highconcentration,frequentdosingcanimpactsludgequalityandincreasesTDS,
makingeffluentlesssuitableasROfeed
Minimizingchemicalexposureminimizesmembranedeteriorationandextends
membraneservicelife.
Reducingdowntimealsoreducesownerrisk whileimprovingsystemflexibility.
83
83
EnviroquipMaintenanceClean

Pressure Chemical
Flowmeter
Regulator Eductor

Stock
Chemical
ControlValve Supply
 CIPCartridgeDistribution

Cleaningtakesapproximately24hour/MBRbasin,usinga
dilutesolutionof0.5%SodiumHypochloriteorCitricAcid
InsitucleaningofmembraneswithoutdrainingMLSS
Chlorinedosagelessthanthattypicallyusedfor
filamentousmicroorganismcontrol
Notanklinersrequired 85
85
 Relaxation
(KingCountyDNREW200Pilot)
3.50
No Relax
3.00

2.50
Line Pressure (psig)

2.00

1.50
Sample Date: 10/11/05
1.00
Avg. Gross Flux = 16.3 gfd1
0.50
Air Scour = 0.014 SCFM/ft2
0.00

-0.50

-1.00

-1.50
4:48 7:12 9:36 12:00 14:24 16:48 19:12 21:36 0:00 2:24
Time (min)

86
86
MinimumMaintenanceOf
MembraneThickener
AutomatedDiffuserCleaning,approx.30
min/day
MembraneRelax,approx.1min/10min
ChemicalCleaning,insitucleanevery6months,
approx2hourduration

NONEEDTODRAINTANKSORTAKEOUTOFSERVICEFORCHEMICALCLEANING!

87
MemTADProcess

Digester2

Digester1
Anox.
Basin

MBT

88
SHOWMETHEBENEFITS

CaseStudiesofAerobic
DigestionProcesseswith
MembraneThickening

89
DundeeWWTP,Michigan

MBRandMemTAD

90
 DundeeWWTP,Michigan

Engineer: Arcadis
History:
Digester#2
Objectivewastoreducethehauling
to2timesperyear.Tanksare
designedtostore180daysat3%
Digester#1 solids.
Operatorfriendlywhencompared
toothersystems.
Enviroquips AerobicDigestion
experienceratedhigherwhen
MBT evaluatedagainstother
vendors/technologies.

91
MembraneThickenerTank

92
92
Digester1

93
93
Digester2

94
DundeeWWTP,Michigan
ThickeningPerformance
Sep & Oct 2005 Operation

6
WAS
5 MBT Thickener
Digester #1
4
Digester #2
% solids 3

0
Date
95
DundeeWWTP,Michigan

MBTPermeateResults
4
BOD
3 TSS
NH3
2

0
9/5 9/15 9/25 10/5 10/15

96
DundeeWWTP,Michigan

January2007toJune2008Data
SustainablePermeateQuality
beforeitsblendedwithMBReffluent
BOD: 1.12mg/l
TSS: 2.00mg/l
NH3N: 0.22mg/l
NO3N: 0.03mg/l
TP: 1.09mg/l

97
DundeeWWTP,MichiganSludge
HaulingCostSummary
Years GallonsHauled DryTons YearlyCost
2004(0.6MGDSBR) 248,885 Belt 22.67 Belt $16,850 Belt
943,200 Truck 99.39 Truck $30,088 Truck
1,192,100 Total 122.06 Total $46,938 Total
2005(1.2MGDMBR) 572,400 Belt 55.62 Belt $39,135 Belt
MBToperationalfor 432,000 MBT 47.55 MBT $14,623 MBT
2nd halfofyearonly 1,004,400 Total 103.17 Total $53,758 Total
2006 887,400 MBT 130.48 MBT* $32,739 MBT

Beltpresswasneededforyears200305due
tolackofstoragespace.
SludgeHaulingcostsforfirstfullyearof
operationofMBTin2006
was$32,739whichislowerthanthelast5
years 98
McFarlandCreek,OH
MBR+MemTAD

99

99
 SMUsInstalledDirectlyin
Digesters

100

100
McFarlandCreekWWTP,Ohio
60,000

50,000

Thickening tank 2

40,000
TSS (mg/L)

30,000

20,000

10,000

0
11/29 1/18 3/9 4/28 6/17 8/6 9/25 11/14 1/3 2/22

Date

Thickening tank 2

MembranethickeningatMcFarlandCreekWWTP
wasabletothickenupto5%solids.
101
UnionRomeWWTP,Ohio
Engineer:CTConsultants
MBRandMemTAD

102
UnionRomeWWTP,Ohio
UnionRomeWWTPMembraneThickeningTSResults
5.0

4.5
Effluent TS
4.0 Influent TS
Concentration (%)

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0
Dec-09 Jan-10 Mar-10 May-10 Jun-10 Aug-10 Sep-10
Date

TheTSconcentrationwasMORETHANTRIPLED
bythickeningwithmembranesatUnionRome
WWTP.
103
UnionRomeWWTP,Ohio

January2010toOctober2010Data
SustainablePermeateQuality
afteritsblendedwithMBReffluent
BOD: <1.0mg/l
TSS: <1.0mg/l
NH3N: <0.1mg/l
TP: <5.0mg/l

104
MembraneThickening

CombinesaMembraneThickeningTankwithaSolids
HoldingTank.
ThickeningnotClassB!
Capableofbetween3%&5%solids
Nopolymerrequired
Continuousthickening independentofwasting
schedule

105
 MembraneThickeningProcess
FlowDiagram
WAS

4QRecycle

MBT SHT

Permeate

ToHaulingorDewatering

ThickenedSludgeReturn

106
WoodsideNY 0.30MGD

Driver:ReduceHaulingcosts

RetrofitsystemfollowingConventionalActivated
Sludge

OperationalsinceFeb.2008

UsingExistingTanks(225dia.x15deep)

107
107
Woodside,NY

108
108
WoodsideMBT
Compartment/SHT

109
109
Woodside,NYResults

ThickeningofCASsolidsto3.0to3.5%

ReducedthenumberoftrucksbyHalfin2008
ReducedamountofNitrogeninthesludgeand
permeate

Lowoperatorattendancerequired

110
110
 EcoMAT

111
Operations:Whatdontyoudo?

Starttheunitupeachday

Shuttheunitdowneachday

Checkthepolymersystem

Checktheunitrepeatedlythroughouttheday

Checkthepolymersystem

112
Operations:Whatdoyoudo?

Collectdailyprocessdata

Performvisualinspectionofsystem

Chemicalcleanmembranes3 4timesperyear

Performregularlyscheduledpreventativemaintenance

113
MBT AerobicDig.Installations
Date Plant City State Liquid Process MBT/ PAD-K

Jun-04 Dundee WWTP Dundee MI MBR PAD-K

Jun-04 Arlington WWTP Arlington WA SBR MBT
Jul-04 Troy WWTP Troy MO MBR PAD-K
Aug-04 McFarland Creek WWTP Chagrin Falls OH MBR PAD-K
Nov-04 Gnadenhutten WWTP Gnadenhutten OH MBR PAD-K
Apr-05 Delphos WWTP Delphos OH MBR Stormmaster
Apr-05 Cottonwood WWTP Manor TX MBR PAD-K
Aug-05 Lewes WWTP Lewes DE MBR MBT
Nov-05 East Dundee WWTP East Dundee IL CAS PAD-K
Apr-06 Yakama IN Casino Toppenish WA MBR PAD-K
May-06 Woodside STP Yaphank NY CAS PAD-K
May-06 Stoutsville WWTP Stoutsville OH MBR MBT
Jun-06 North Lewisberg WWTP North Lewisberg OH MBR MBT
Jul-06 Harvest Monrovia Hunstville AL MBR MBT
Jul-06 Bob's Creek WWTP Lincoln County MO MBR PAD-K
Aug-06 Hamden WWTP Hamden OH MBR MBT
Aug-06 Shelton WWTP Shelton WA MBR MBT
Sep-06 Lake of the Pines WWTP Auburn CA MBR PAD-K
Nov-06 Concrete WWTP Concrete WA MBR PAD-K
Dec-06 Providence Estates O'Fallon MO MBR PAD-K
Feb-07 Westford-Acton WWTP Acton MA MBR MBT
Apr-07 Winlock WWTP Winlock WA MBR PAD-K
Jun-07 Burwell Road WWTP Hunstville AL MBR MBT
Jun-07 Highland Lake Estates WWTP Monroe NY MBR MBT
Apr-08 Alpine WWTP Alpine WY MBR PAD-K
Jul-08 Union Rome WWTP Union Rome OH MBR PAD-K
Oct-09 C'oeur d'Alene Casino C'oeur d'Alene ID MBR PAD-K
Dec-09 Cayce WWTP Cayce SC OX PAD-K

114

114
 AirBeamCovers

AirBeam covershelptoaidintemperaturecontroland
integratesOvivosaerationequipment

115
 AirBeamwithDiffusers

6/13/2014
 AirBeamCovers
AirBeam Components

117
 AirBeamCovers

6/13/2014
 AirBeamwithDraftTube

6/13/2014
 IsAerobicDigestionRightforYou

120
RightforYou?
AerobicDigestionisverygoodforanyonewhohasa
nutrientlimitontheireffluent
Weareabletoremovenitrogen(andphosphoruswith
thememTAD)thusloweringtheimpactofrecycle
streamsontheliquidprocess
MemTADsystemscanbefedaroundtheclock,this
meanslessofashockontheliquidstreambiomass

121
RightforYou?
Ourproductsandsystems(especiallythemembranes)
areidealforexpandingexistingcapacityof
treatmentplants
Thisisahugeissueastownsandcitieshavetodomore
withlessallthetime

122
RightforYou?
Membraneproductsproducereusequalityeffluent
Aswaterbecomesmoreandmorevaluablethisfeature
isgoingtobecomemoreandmoreimportantfor
wastewaterplants

123
RightforYou?

Coarsebubblediffusersworkextremelywellindeep
tanks,alwaysbeonthelookoutforaplantthathas
existingdeeptanksand/oronelookingtolowerits
blowerpowerrequirements.

124
 ThankYouforyourTimeand
Attention!

125