Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Improving the process for managing wind and solar energy projects
on public lands, and taking care of the nearby communities and
resources after development occurs, would benefit state and local
governments, wind and solar power companies, local communities,
hunters, anglers and those who recreate on Americas public lands.
Thats why so many of these constituencies are supporting sensible
renewable energy reforms that:
1. Explore an efficient leasing system for wind and solar energy
projects Arizona has some of the best wind
2. Ensure that the government receives a fair financial return for and solar resources in the country,
and we want to develop them.
allowing renewable energy companies to build wind and solar
But the process of developing
farms on public lands these resources can adversely
3. Establish a fair distribution formula for sharing those revenues impact local communities.
from wind and solar projects Returning a portion of the
revenues generated through wind
A leasing system designed to be more efficient could make the and solar energy generation is a
smart concept. These revenues
permitting process simpler and less expensive for land management
would help offset the burden on
agencies to administer. It would also ensure that wind and solar
county resources and fund critical
developers are more accurately charged for using public lands. community services.
Liz Archuleta
Only Congress has the ability to set up a fair distribution formula to Supervisor District 2, Coconino County, AZ
Source: Private Communication
ensure that royalties generated from wind and solar projects help
states and communities affected by the projects, facilitate timely
permit processing, and provide funds that can be reinvested in fish
and wildlife restoration, water protection and recreation activities. Proposed Revenue
Distribution Formula
One renewable energy reform option under consideration in
Congress, the Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act,
Permit
would distribute those revenues according to the following formula: Processing
15%
25% to the states where projects are sited; Fish and
Wildlife
25% to the counties where projects are sited; Conservation
35%
15% to the agencies to help process permits; Counties
25%
35% to a Renewable Energy Conservation Fund for fish,
wildlife and land conservation. states
25%
Percentage of voters who favor/oppose distributing funds A recent survey found
I spend my free time exploring and There is good reason for doing so.
fishing on public land in Oregon,
Wyoming, Montana, and my home
STATES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES
state of Idaho. Many of these
Royalty revenue shared with local governments in areas where wind and
places remain unspoiled and offer
a chance to encounter wildlife in its solar projects are being built would help support county operations
natural state. This is made possible impacted by energy development. In addition to helping stabilize local
by the foresight and efforts of operating budgets, royalty revenues could also fund:
prior generations to set them aside, capital improvement projects (e.g. road maintenance)
and now we have a duty to future public safety and law enforcement
generations to preserve public
local conservation efforts
lands for their enjoyment.
If our nations energy predicament State governments would also benefit. State agencies play a
requires developing renewable and
significant role in the permitting process for wind and solar projects
sustainable energy resources on
on public lands within their states. A share of royalty revenue would
public land, I believe low-impact
strategies like wind and solar are help offset the time and resources state governments put in to
the best options for native wildlife ensuring that wind and solar projects are developed responsibly.
so long as they are carefully
selected and diligently monitored. LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCIES
It also makes sense that revenues Returning a portion of collected royalties to the agencies managing
generated from these projects
wind and solar projects on public lands would help them work
be funneled back into fish and
through the backlog of existing applications and process new
wildlife habitat to conserve species,
preserve native ecosystems, and applications more efficiently.
offset habitat loss.
Bucky Ryan Percentage of voters who favor/oppose dedicating a CONSERVATION FUND
Source: Peak Campaigns and Bellwether Research& Consulting
Sportsman, Boise, ID portion of funds from wind and solar projects on public
Source: Private Communication
lands to restoring fish and wildlife habitat that has been Using a portion of the
impacted by development.
royalties from wind and
100
85% solar projects to offset
90
80
their impacts on water,
70
60
wildlife and recreation also
50 has broad public support.
40
30
20
11% 5%
10
0
FAVOR OPPOSE DK
Renewable Energy Future revenue sharing dollars
on Public Lands: will contribute to the delivery of
critical governmental services and
anglers, outdoor recreationists, and the environmental community Western Governors support
recognize that there is room for improvement, and that there are continued and accelerated
deployment of renewable energy
additional decisions to be made about how the royalty revenues
projects, and associated clean
collected from wind and solar developments are reinvested in our energy job growth, in our states.
public lands. They agree that planning and building wind and solar In siting renewable energy
projects on public lands must be balanced with conservation and projects and transmission lines, we
encourage areas be developed
land protection efforts, and they want to see efforts from Congress
which will have the least impact
that will create that equal footing. on wildlife and other important
land uses. Shared royalties from
renewable energy development
can be used by state agencies to
support land, wildlife, and water
conservation in affected areas.
Western Governors Association
Source: March 2013 letter to
Senator Tester and Representative Gosar