Sample Essay 1:

Some countries are developing their nuclear weapons these days, and it becomes a serious
threat to the world peace. But it is undeniable that nuclear technology is clean for the
environment and offers low-cost energy source. Therefore a lot of people believe that nuclear
technology has more positive sides than its negatives. I personally disagree with the statement
and the following essay will discuss in details about it.

To begin with, even though nuclear power could be used as an alternative source of energy,
but some parties could misuse the technology. Nuclear power plants can be used as
propaganda by some countries, whereas they will tell the public that they only use the
technology for power generation purposes. But, the public would never know what lies
behind their plants, as they might be developing an advanced and sophisticated nuclear
weapons.

And then, although nuclear power plants are safe to the environment and cheaper in cost,
many people still believe that they are a serious threat to the surrounding areas. Some
countries have tried to manage their nuclear power plants cautiously, but sometimes
unexpected events happen and cause a serious effect on the surrounding areas. For example,
it is undeniable that Japan is well known for its advanced, effective and modern nuclear
technology. But in the year 2010, a tsunami had struck one of the countrys power plants, and
as a consequence, it caused a leakage in the plants and many casualties were found.

I believe that that weapon of much destruction is always a threat to the world and it is hard to
believe that a weapon can maintain world peace. The history tells us how the weapons have
destroyed millions of lives and have caused severe damage to our environment.

In conclusion, although nuclear technology could be used as a clean and cheap source of
energy, I strongly disagree with it. Even though strict monitoring is made sure for those
nuclear plant and research centres, some countries might secretly use it as a weapon. And
then, no matter how well the power plants are built, they could still be a threat for our
civilisations, as we could never predict that any natural disaster could hit these power plants
anytime.

[ Written by - Darwin Lesmana ]

Model Answer 2:
Nuclear power is an innovation of the modern science. It is the key source of nuclear
weapons. Nuclear technology can be used for our benefits as the natural resources are limited
and being exhausted every second. It can be the most efficient alternative to fuel, electricity,
and other types of energy. But yet nuclear weapons are a threat to our existence and single
misuse of this giant power can destroy our civilisation.

Many of the first world countries have achieved the nuclear power and have become a
superpower. It can initially seem that mono-polarization of nuclear power preserves world
peace but the idea is not agreeable always. The present world is not in a position where
powerful countries will shout at weaker and the peace will prevail. The reality is we notice
lots of suicide bombing attack and the hatred; the wrath of the people is so acute that they
won't even think about the existence of our civilisation. To maintain peace there must be a
peaceful way. Anger, Power threat and domination can't keep the peace in the worlds. So I
disagree with the statement that nuclear weapon can maintain the world peace and far-weight
the disadvantages but I do agree with the idea that nuclear power can be a great source of
cheap energy.

It is very much true that nuclear power is an alternative and perhaps the most efficient source
of energy during these days of the energy crisis. Unlike other natural resources such as
petroleum or gas , it is highly effective for industrial, transportation and other purposes and it
is pollution free. As it is limitless, there is no question of its being used up like other natural
resources like natural gas. Moreover, to control the over-increasing environmental pollution
we have to use this technology in every applicable field. One day we all will be bound to use
nuclear power to continue our life when there won't be any natural gas, fuels at all.

However, this power is not available to all walks of life. Even it is absent in many countries
who are searching for an alternative energy source. Only a few countries can produce it and
unfortunately they are very strict to conceal their technology. Without having easy-access, a
source of energy can not be a good one. Besides nuclear power needs the utmost and very
careful handling, in the case of any indulgence, or any misuse can cause a huge loss of life
and property. For instance, Chernobyl Nuclear Plant hazard affected a huge loss of lives. The
balance of ecosystem was completely disturbed and even now, after this long time, people are
affected by the nuclear side-effects. This is one but not the only incidence of radioactivity and
we must be cautious about what might happen in future.

In addition, nuclear power tends superpower to dominate others. It has become general that a
superpower can easily attack a weak nation with any lame cause but negotiate with
superpowers. But this is not going to be the common scenario always.

In conclusion, the nuclear power can be used for our benefit or even for destruction. This
totally depends on the ideology, humanity and our well-thinking. So we must use it for our
betterment, not for our destruction.

(Approximately 541 words)

(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is
just one example out of many possible answers.)

Model Answer 3:
Nuclear energy is a two sided sword. On the one hand, it provides sustainable clean energy,
while on the other hand, it provides weapons of mass destruction. However, I believe the
benefits of using nuclear energy far outweigh its disadvantages, and it is essential to the
world peace.

Throughout human history, man has derived energy by burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil
and natural gas. Excavation and burning of fossil fuels on a large scale for factories and
automobiles have disturbed the ecological balance of nature and is leading to pollution and
global warming. In contrast, nuclear power provides a clean source of energy as it does not
release any harmful gases into the atmosphere. Energy generated using nuclear power is even
cheaper than that generated by burning fossil fuels. The radioactive waste products of nuclear
energy can be kept in specially created containers so that they do not disturb the environment.

Opponents of nuclear energy always cite the risks of a nuclear war by the development of
nuclear weapons. However, it is interesting to note that till today there has not been a single
major war between states possessing nuclear weapons. The United States and Russia were
rivals during the cold war. However, they never went to a war as doing so would mean
destruction on a large scale on both sides. India and Pakistan fought three major wars since
their independence. However, after possessing nuclear weapons, there has not been a single
major war between them. Possession of nuclear weapons acts as a deterrent to war, as a war
between two nuclear weapons state would lead to catastrophe on both sides. The only use of
nuclear weapons the world has seen is on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States
during World War 2. Both the cities were levelled with tens of thousands of people killed
instantly and more than thousands later by the radiation poisoning. Mankind cannot afford
such devastation.

In light of the above arguments, I believe the benefits of using nuclear energy far outweigh its
disadvantages, and it is essential to the world peace.

(Approximately 345words)
(by Pankaj Kohli)

Model Answer 4:
The use of nuclear power has been one of the most controversial issues over many years.
Although there seem to be clear benefits of this power, its drawbacks can never be
underestimated. I, however, strongly agree that the pros of this technology are much more
than its cons which will be discussed in this essay.

Those who are against nuclear weapons present their arguments on the base of the threat it
presents to the world. These powerful weapons, if goes into destructive hands, would be
devastating enough to wipe off an entire city in minutes. The two cities of Japan namely
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, destroyed during the Second World War can be taken as examples.
Furthermore, natural disasters like earthquakes and Tsunamis might, at any time, collapse the
nuclear power plants. This will not only kill thousands of people by their radio hazards but
also might leave negative impacts on the future generations.

Nevertheless, the merits that nuclear weapons bring are crucial to the world. Firstly, it is the
cheapest source of energy, a tremendous amount of energy can be produced to meet the
demand of the growing population with very little resources. So, the use of organic fuels can
be cut down. In addition to this, it is pollution free so the global warming and greenhouse
effects might be reduced to some extent by replacing fossil fuels with it. The natural
resources like fuels and oils would not last forever and then the nuclear power can be the best
solution as a source of energy. It would be a cheaper form of energy as a single nuclear power
plant can provide the energy required to run a whole city.

Therefore, I would like to conclude that in spite of some drawbacks of nuclear weapons and
power, their advantages are enumerable. They should however, be used with safety and
precautions.

(Approximately 258 words)

(by Sazna Koirala)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 3.83 (6 Votes)

IELTS Essay
 Prev

Next

Comments

0 # Sughra Afzali 2016-10-17 15:10

Thanks a lot for providing the best samples. Those helped me a lot...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
0 # Nima 2015-09-30 12:53
The argument about nuclear power and the possible threats it possesses has been existing for
a long as a controversial and complicated one. Totally I disagree with the statement that the
threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace and harmony. The nuclear powers are
very dangerous for mankind however I think the nuclear technology has many benefits in
other various branches and industries.

I tried to reach my decisions considering all sides of this subject and pros and cons with some
examples and several explanations as below.

First of all, many developed countries misuse nuclear power for military aims and producing
nuclear bombs is not necessary at all by any country of the world. It is a very destructive
weapon that is forded a huge number of people like in Japan during World War ii by USA
army. Moreover maintaining nuclear planets is very sensitive and any disaster would be
horrible. Some shocking events and happening occurred around the world such as Chernobyl
accident in Russia and explosion of nuclear plants in Japan after tsunami leads to death of
many inhabitants.

On the other hand, nuclear power is one of the good sources of renewable energy. Today
many industrialized countries use this energy in their technology and industries for instances
as fuel of rocket, medicine goals and generate pharmaceutical and drugs, fuels of plants and
some huge organizations and factories and etc. For this growing trend of science and
technology the next generation will see more achievements and prosperity in different scope
of knowledge with nuclear power attendance.

In summary, in my opinion nuclear technology is a good source for advancement and energy
but human must use this power in the right way. Nevertheless I reject the first statement that
states nuclear weapons maintain the amenity and peace of entire the world. If we maintain
world peace with a so destructive weapon like nuclear bomb, we will need to rethink about
the world we are living in!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote