Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRANSFER CHUTE
By S.K.Bag
hat are the major problems associated with bulk material
belt
belt--conveyor transfer points?
Most of the major problems with bulk material belt-conveyor
belt transfer points can be
attributed to problems with the original design, field retrofits and the low priority given
during the design process. It is common for the transfer point to be the last part of a
belt conveyor system designed almost as an afterthought .
Some of the major problems that mines/plants have with transfer points are:
Plugging - Stops the entire operation.
Spillage - Corrosion, extra cost of maintenance and most importantly safety (one-half
(one
of all the accidents that occur around belt conveyors in mines are attributable to
cleanup and repairs required by spillage and build-up
build per MSHA statistics).
Belt Wear - Poor chute design can reduce belt life by as much as 75% and belting is
the largest cost of the conveyor system.
Chute Wear - As conveyor throughputs become larger, the down time to fix and
repair a chute will not only be a direct maintenance cost but a lost of production,
directly impacting the output of the facility.
Material Degradation - Leads to dust generation, reduction in the quality of the
material and in some extremes the cause of a fire or an explosion.
Spillage
Plugging
Belt wear, impact damage
Chute wear on the sides dust generation and material degredation
IMPACT & VELOCITY
IMPACT & VELOCITY
IMPACT & VELOCITY
IMPACT & VELOCITY
IMPACT & VELOCITY
IMPACT & VELOCITY
IMPACT & VELOCITY
DESIGN OBJECTIVES FOR CHUTE DESIGN
Often moist bulk solids will adhere initially to a chute surface, but as
the bed depth increases, the correspondence decrease in friction
angle will cause flow to be initiated. In some cases flow commences
with block-like
like motion, as shown in the above sketch.
Chute Angles for material with difficult flowability :
It would be safe to keep the chute angle more than repose angle
of material by 15 - 20.. Chutes with valley angle geometries
need careful attention. In a chute with two adjacent 5555 plates,
the valley angle will be 45.. Hence there is the danger of
material build-up
up in the valleys. The valley angle is increased
accordingly, or designed out, e.g. in a vertical sided chute. In a
chute extended to carry the fines from belt cleaners, angles in
excess of 70 are required to prevent build-up
build of the often sticky,
wet, fine material that is removed from the belt. The fines (or
slimes) that stick to the belt have effectively no angle of repose -
they hang upside down.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
2. Conveyor Head Chutes - The trajectory of material flowing from the
head pulley of a conveyor belt is predictable. Trajectories are sensitive to
belt speed, material load profile, size distribution and moisture content.
The trajectory is estimated from the centre of area of the material profile.
If the belt line is taken, the discharged material will impact the head chute
hood higher up than predicted. Once the trajectory is determined, the
chute hood is designed around the material flow path. Inspection access
covers are located out of the material impact zone or flow path. Cover
plates are sized and hinged so that a man can easily open them. Once
opened, they must not fall back with the possibility of injuries. On a safety
aspect, the sides of a head chute enclosing a head and snub pulley
should be extended backwards sufficiently to cover all possible nip points
on the belt.
Incorrect trajectory One method to cater for varying
loading/speed
3. Chute Widths - Chute widths are usually designed to suit the piece
of mechanical equipment that follows the chute. Nevertheless, chutes
are designed to a minimum width of three times the maximum expected
lump size. For example, for a 300 mm lump size, the chute should be
900 mm -1 1 m square. Ideally, facilities are used to remove rogue
material from a materials handling system as early as possible. In run-
run
of-mine
mine ore, such rogue material, consisting of outsize rock slabs, tramp
iron, timber, etc., would easily choke a properly designed chute.
Another important consideration is the volumetric flow rate of the
material. Once the chute is sized for the largest lumps, it is also sized
for the volume to be handled.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS