Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thomas Sandri
Shermco Industries
ABSTRACT
Over the years there have been several methods and/or philosophies regarding the acceptance and
maintenance field testing of medium voltage underground electrical power cable. Time honored methods
such as direct current (DC) High Potential, Insulation Resistance (IR), and Dielectric Absorption (DA)
testing have been employed for many years by utilities and industrial facilities for both field acceptance
testing and periodic maintenance evaluation of medium voltage insulated power cables.
Insulation Resistance provides a simple test for identifying gross defects in the cable and accessories, but
offers little to no diagnostic value. A test like dielectric absorption is useful because it can be performed
on even the longest of cables, and yields a self-contained evaluation based on relative readings rather
than absolute values.
In the early 1990s the benefits of using DC high potential testing for maintenance purposes of extruded
dielectric cables has been questioned and written out of most industry guides. Since the days of high
potential DC, other testing methods have been developed that may provide a better indication of the
integrity of cables, splices, and terminations. These methods include Very Low Frequency (VLF) high
potential testing, Tan Delta, and both Online and Offline Partial Discharge testing.
So where do we stand today? What are the modern techniques and what value do they offer? Do we
treat Acceptance testing the same as Maintenance testing? What is the difference? This paper will
explore developments in testing and evaluation of medium voltage cable seen over the last 20 years.
The intended application of each technique along with the advantages and limitations of the technique will
be reviewed providing the knowledge necessary to develop an effective cable testing program.
INTRODUCTION
As time progresses and a cable system ages, the systems bulk dielectric strength degrades. During this
aging process artifacts such as water trees, delamination, voids, and shield corrosion raise the local
stress placed on the cable during normal operation. The exact way in which the strength of a device
degrades will depend upon many factors such as voltage, thermal stresses, maintenance practices,
system age, cable system technology and materials, and environment.
For years, high-voltage direct current (DC) testing has been the traditionally accepted method for judging
the serviceability of medium-voltage cables. DC high-potential tests have worked well for conducting
dielectric strength and condition assessment tests on paper insulated lead covered (PILC) cable. When
cable materials began to change and plastic insulated cables were first introduced in the 1960s, little was
known as to the overall aging characteristics of the new materials and therefore DC continued to be the
preferred method of testing.
As time moved on plastic insulated cables became more abundant and as they aged they began showing
effects of service age. DC continued to be the dominate test, but concerns began to grow over the
effectiveness of this test. In the early 1990s reports started to surface indicating that DC high potential
testing could be the blame for latent damage experienced by extruded medium voltage cable insulation.
This paper will review the evolution of testing methods and philosophies over the past 20 years. The
intended application of each technique along with the advantages and limitations of the technique will be
reviewed providing the knowledge necessary to develop an effective cable testing program.
In a typical medium voltage cable, copper or aluminum wires (either stranded or solid) are used as the
conductors. These conductors are covered with an extruded polymeric stress-control layer made of semi-
conductive compounds, often referred to as the conductor shield. The insulation layer immediately
surrounds and is fully-bonded with the conductor shield. An insulation shield encases the insulation and
in some cases may be composed of the same semi-conductive material as the conductor shield. The
copper neutral wires or tape are wound around the insulation shield and are usually covered with a
thermoplastic polyethylene jacket for mechanical protection from the external environment and to reduce
moisture intrusion into the cable, all of which can cause the premature cable failure.
Various conductor strand types are commonly used in cable construction. The various types provide
advantages in certain applications by either reducing the diameter of the
cable or by lowering total AC resistance for a given cross-sectional area of
conducting material. Examples include:
Concentric Strand
A sector conductor is a stranded conductor whose cross-section is approximately the shape of a sector of
a circle. A multiple conductor insulated cable with sector conductors has a smaller diameter than the
corresponding cable with round conductors.
Sector Conductor
Figure 3
Segmental Conductor
A segmental conductor is a round, stranded conductor composed of three or four sectors slightly
insulated from one another. This construction has the advantage of lower AC resistance due to increased
surface area and skin effect.
Segmental Conductor
Figure 4
Compact Strand
A compact stranded conductor is a round or sector conductor having all layers stranded in the same
direction and rolled to a predetermined ideal shape. The finished conductor is smooth on the surface and
contains practically no interstices or air spaces. This results in a smaller diameter.
Compact Strand
Figure 5
Conductor Shield
The conductors of the cable are covered with an extruded polymeric stress-control layer made of semi-
conductive compounds, often referred to as the conductor shield. The conductor shield shields the cable
insulation from any air surrounding the conductor strands. This is very important since air gaps will lead
to ionization and partial discharge activity which will prematurely fail the insulation.
Comparing the dielectric losses of various insulation types we can see that polyethylene (PE) and cross-
linked polyethylene (XLPE) offer the lowest dielectric losses. Paper/Oil (PILC) has low to medium
dielectric losses and ethylene propylene rubber (EPR) offers the highest dielectric losses. This
comparison of materials also shows that PE and XLPE have sensitivity to water contamination (treeing)
while EPR offers relatively low sensitivity to water contamination.
An understanding of the insulation material plays a key factor in the testing of cable and analysis of test
results. When testing hybrid or mixed circuits, the insulation with the higher dielectric loss may mask the
true condition of the cable section with lower dielectric losses.
Table 1
Insulation Materials Insulation Shield
Material Advantages Disadvantages
PE Lowest dielectric losses Highly sensitive to water treeing
High initial dielectric Material breaks down at high
strength temperatures
XLPE Low dielectric losses Medium sensitivity to water treeing
Improved material (although some XLPE polymers are
properties at high water tree resistant)
temperatures
Does not melt but thermal
expansion occurs
EPR Increased flexibility Medium high dielectric losses
Reduced thermal Requires inorganic filler/additive
expansion (relative to
XLPE)
Low sensitivity to water
treeing
Paper / Oil Low medium dielectric High weight
losses High cost
Not harmed by high Requires hydraulic pressure / pumps for
potential DC testing insulating fluid
Known history of reliability Difficult to repair
Degrades with moisture
The insulation shield encases the insulation and in some cases may be composed of the same semi-
conductive material as the conductor shield. It serves a similar purpose as the conductor shield and
shields the insulation from air that might cause ionization and partial discharge activity.
Insulation Shield
Figure 7
The purposes of the insulation shield are to:
Obtain symmetrical radial stress distribution within the insulation.
Eliminate tangential and longitudinal stresses on the surface of the insulation.
Exclude from the dielectric field those materials such as braids, tapes, and fillers that are not
intended as insulation.
Protect the cables from induced or direct over-voltages. Shields do this by making the surge
impedance uniform along the length of the cable and by helping to attenuate surge potentials.
Cable Shielding
Medium and high-voltage power cables, in circuits over 2000 volts, usually have a shield layer of copper
or aluminum tape or conducting polymer. If an unshielded insulated cable is in contact with earth or a
grounded object, the electrostatic field around the conductor will be concentrated at the contact point,
resulting in corona discharge, and eventual destruction of the insulation. Leakage current and capacitive
current through the insulation presents a danger of electrical shock. The grounded shield equalizes
electrical stress around the conductor and diverts any leakage current to ground. Stress relief cones
should be applied at the shield ends, especially for cables operating at more than 2 kV to earth.
Wire Shielded (also called concentric neutral): This cable offers the same construction as the tape-
shielded cable except for the different metallic shield layer. It is often considered interchangeable with
the tape-shielded cable and is very common in utility applications. When concentric neutral cables are
specified, the concentric neutrals
must be manufactured in
accordance with the Insulated
Cable Engineers Association
(ICEA) standards. These wires
must meet ASTM B3 for uncoated
wires or B33 for coated wires.
UniShield, a registered
trademark of BICC Cables: Note
the Uni in the name, which
refers to the outer three layers
being combined into a single layer
(insulation shield, which also
functions as a jacket, with metallic
drain wires imbedded into the
jacket to form a single functional
layer). UniShield Cable
Figure 10
PILC, paper-insulated, lead-
covered cable: The paper insulation is impregnated with oil which must be kept contained within the
cable by use of a lead jacket.
CABLE AGING
As time progresses and the cable system ages, the bulk dielectric strength degrades. The main aging
factor of extruded dielectric cable is electrical although under abnormal situations thermal aging can be
significant. The electrical aging mechanisms; partial discharge, electrical treeing, water treeing, and
charge injection occur at contaminants, defects, protrusions and voids and thus tend to be localized.
Looking at specific mechanisms, the excessive electrical stress or bulk deterioration of the insulation can
occur as a result of:
Manufacturing Imperfections: Increases the local stress leading to either early failure or higher
rates of aging.
o Voids
o Contaminants in insulations
o Poor application of shield material
o Protrusions on the shields
o Poor application of jackets
Poor Workmanship: Increases the local stress leading to either early failure or higher rates of
aging.
o Cuts
o Contamination
o Missing applied components or connections
o Misalignment of accessories
Aggressive Environment: Reduces the dielectric strength. The impact can be local if the
environmental influence is local.
o Chemical attack
o Transformer oil leaks
o Floods
o Petrochemical spills
o Neutral corrosion
Wet Environment: Reduces the dielectric strength and increase the local stress.
o Bowtie trees
o Vented water trees
o High rates of corrosion
o Can reduce dielectric properties
Overheating: Reduces the dielectric strength. The impact can be restricted to short lengths (local)
if the adverse thermal environment is localized.
o Excessive conductor current for a given environment and operating condition (global)
o Proximity to other cable circuits for short distances (local)
Mechanical: Reduces the dielectric strength. The impact can be restricted to short lengths if the
mechanical stress is localized.
o Damage during transportation. This is typically localized.
o Excessive pulling tensions or sidewall bearing pressures. This can be either localized or
global.
o Damage from dig-ins. Typically localized.
Water Ingress: Reduces the dielectric strength and increase the stress in the area surrounding
the moisture.
o Normal migration through polymeric materials
o Breaks in seals or metallic sheaths
Water Trees
Water trees, sometimes called electrochemical trees, have basic characteristics different than electrical
trees. Electrical trees are characterized by the occurrence of partial discharge and require high electric
Water tree degradation is a major problem for medium voltage extruded dielectric cables, particularly
service aged XLPE cables. It is perhaps the worst degradation process of the polymeric insulation that
contributes to the failure of the cable.
Water tree are formed and grow in the presence of moisture, impurities or contamination and the electric
field over time. There are generally two types of water trees, namely Bow-Tie Trees and Vented Trees.
Bow-Tie trees are water trees that grow from the insulation outwards towards the surfaces of the
insulation. These trees grow in the direction of the electric field in both directions, towards the two
electrodes. Bow-Tie trees have faster initial growth rate as compared to vented trees. Bow-Tie trees are
however, not capable to growing to large sizes and usually do not grow to a size significant enough to
cause failure of the insulation.
Vented Tree are water trees that grow from the surface of the polymer inwards into the insulation system.
These trees will also grow in the direction of the electric field. Vented trees have a lower initial growth
rate as compared to bow-tie trees; however, vented trees are capable of growing right through the entire
insulation thickness.
Electrical Trees
The cumulative effect of partial discharges within solid dielectrics is the formation of numerous, branching
partially conducting discharge channels, a process called electrical treeing. Repetitive discharge events
cause irreversible mechanical and chemical deterioration of the insulating material. Damage is caused by
the energy dissipated by high energy electrons or ions, ultraviolet light from the discharges, ozone
attacking the void walls, and cracking as the chemical breakdown processes liberate gases at high
pressure.
The chemical transformation of the dielectric also tends to increase the electrical conductivity of the
dielectric material surrounding the voids. This increases the electrical stress in the unaffected gap region,
accelerating the breakdown process.
Over the years there have been several methods and/or philosophies regarding the testing of
underground electrical power cable in the field. The Insulated Conductor Committee of the IEEE Power &
Energy Society has divided these methods or philosophies into two fundamental categories, Type 1 Field
Tests and Type 2 Field Tests.
Type 1 tests are intended to detect defects in the insulation of the cable system in order to improve the
service reliability after the defective part is removed and appropriate repairs are performed. These tests
are usually achieved by application of moderately increased voltages across the insulation for a
prescribed duration of time. Such tests are categorized as pass/fail. Tests include:
Type 2 tests are intended to provide indications that the insulation system has deteriorated, hence, are
termed diagnostic tests. These tests include:
Dissipation Factor (Tan Delta) Testing (IEEE 400.2 - GUIDE FOR FIELD TESTING OF
SHIELDED POWER CABLE SYSTEMS USING VERY LOW FREQUENCY (VLF))
Partial Discharge (IEEE 400.3 - GUIDE FOR PARTIAL DISCHARGE TESTING OF SHIELDED
POWER CABLE SYSTEMS IN A FIELD ENVIRONMENT)
Isothermal Relaxation Current Test, and
Return Voltage
1. Installation tests: These are field tests that are conducted after cable installation is complete, but
before splicing or terminating occurs. The test is intended to detect shipping, storage, or
installation damage.
2. Acceptance tests: These are field tests made after the cable system installation, splicing and
terminations are completed, but before the cable system is placed in normal service. The tests
are intended to further detect installation damage and to show any gross defects or errors in
installation of the various system components.
3. Maintenance tests: Field tests made during the operating life of a cable system. They are
intended to detect deterioration of the system and to check the serviceability so that suitable
maintenance procedures can be initiated.
The International Electrical Testing Association (NETA) addresses field testing of medium and high
voltage cables in their Standard for Acceptance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment
and Systems and Standard for Maintenance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment and
Systems books.
Under voltage test performed with direct current (DC) are typically performed with a test set referred to as
a megohmmeter. Since these tests use voltages under the rating of the insulation being tested, the test is
considered to be a non-destructive test and does not produce any of the ill effects associated with high
voltage DC testing that we will discuss later in this paper. The traditional insulation resistance test is the
simplest way to gain an overall indication of the condition of the insulation. Although the Insulation
A megohmmeter is a portable instrument that provides a direct reading of insulation resistance in ohms,
meg-ohms, gig-ohms, or tera-ohms regardless of the test voltage selected. For good insulation, the
resistance usually reads in the meg-ohm or higher range. An insulation resistance tester is essentially a
high range resistance meter or ohmmeter, with a built-in DC generator to produce the test voltage. The
most common voltages applied for non-destructive insulation tests on medium voltage cables are 2.5 and
5.0 kV DC.
The test sets internal DC generator, which can be hand-cranked, battery- or line-operated, develops a
high DC voltage that causes several small currents to flow through and over surfaces of the insulation
being tested. The total current is measured by the ohmmeter, which has an analog indicating scale, digital
readout or both.
If the insulation resistance reading taken was high and if the reading increased or remained steady during
the test, the insulation is considered to be in good condition. As the capacitance current and absorption
current decreases, the insulation resistance increases. If the insulation resistance reading decreased
during the test, the insulation of the cable is probably wet or otherwise in bad condition. If the final value
of resistance is low (or the current is high), the insulation of the cable is in poor condition.
A valuable property of insulation is that it charges during the course of a test. The polar DCield applied
by the megohmmeter causes re-alignment of the insulating material on the molecular level, as dipoles
orient themselves with the field. This movement of charge constitutes a current. Its value as a diagnostic
indicator is based on two opposing factors: the current dies away as the structure reaches its final
2015 Doble Engineering Company 82nd International Conference of Doble Clients
All Rights Reserved
10 of 23
orientation, while leakage promoted by deterioration passes a comparatively large, constant current.
The net result is that, with good insulation, leakage current is relatively small, and resistance rises
dramatically as charging goes to completion. This changing resistance provides diagnostic information
related to the degree of degradation of insulation.
Deteriorated insulation will pass relatively large amounts
of leakage current at a constant rate for the applied
voltage. This will flood out the charging effect and will
show little to no change in resistance value.
Spot readings alone can be difficult to work with, as they may range from enormous values in new cables
down to a few meg-ohms just before the cable is removed from service. A test like the PI is particularly
useful because it can be performed on even the longest of cables, and yields a self-contained evaluation
based on relative readings rather than absolute values.
There have emerged a range of techniques that look at the response of the insulation during its
discharge. These tests all target the polarization behavior of the insulation, because as mentioned earlier
in this paper, this property is sensitive to moisture in the insulation. Since all three components of current
are present during the charging phase of an insulation test, the determination of polarization or absorption
current is hampered by the presence of the capacitive and leakage currents. The discharge phase of the
test, however, can more rapidly remove these effects, giving the possibility of interpreting the degree of
polarization of the insulation and relating this to moisture and other polarization effects.
This test has been developed for testing of service aged medium voltage cables and grew as a response
to problems associated with DC high potential testing of plastic cables. The early installed base of these
cables from the 1960s and early 1980s are particularly problematic.
The IRC test uses a 1kV test voltage for 30 minutes to polarize the dielectric. The polymer polarization
traps charge at specific discrete energy levels and during the discharge process these energy levels give
rise to different time constants in the discharge current. The major use of the effect in the IRC test is to
look for the time constant associated with water trees in degraded cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) cable
material. The relaxation current occurring after the capacitance has been discharged is digitized for
processing in PC based software.
The software processing is based on a modelling technique, which converts the current into Charge and
plots this Charge against Time. The total charge plot is then treated as a composite of standard shapes
whose time constants are fitted to the composite curve by iteration. Aging of the cable is identified by
For years, high-voltage DC testing has been the traditionally accepted method for judging the
serviceability of medium-voltage cables. Direct current tests have worked well for conducting high
potential and condition assessment tests on paper insulated lead covered (PILC) cable. When plastic
insulated cables were first introduced in the 1960s DC continued to be the preferred method.
As time moved on plastic insulated cables became more abundant and began showing effects of service
age. Direct current continued to be the dominate test, but concerns began to grow over the effectiveness
of this test. In the early 1990s reports started to surface indicating that DC high potential testing could be
the blame for latent damage experienced by extruded medium voltage cable insulation (cross linked
polyethylene and ethylene propylene rubber). After receiving these reports the Electrical Power
Research Institute (EPRI) funded a study relating to cross linked polyethylene (XLPE) and ethylene
propylene rubber (EPR) cables. This study (EPRI reports TR-101245) yielded the following conclusions
regarding XLPE cable:
To better understand the conclusions of the EPRI study, it is beneficial to once again review the aging
characteristics of extruded dielectric cables and the process of water treeing.
Water trees begin to form when a cable is exposed to water and normal operating voltage over an
extended period of time. Electrical forces acting on water molecules, electrophoresis, at a microscopic
point within the insulation, increases the separation between polymer units. These water droplets become
oriented into a chain-like channel. The result is a sharp electrode, producing highly localized stresses.
Once treeing is initiated, an electrical stress exists from the base of the tree channel to its extremity.
When high levels of DC voltages are impressed on solid extruded polymeric materials their good electrical
insulation properties become degraded. For example, trapped or low mobility electrically charged species
within the bulk can give rise to space charge, resulting in localized electric stress enhancement. This can
cause further concentration of charge and accelerate electrical ageing. The water tree part contains more
ionic impurities than the sound part. It is therefore likely that, in XLPE cable under DC voltage stress, the
space charges are formed in the water tree region and its vicinity promoting an increase in water tree
growth and reduced service life.
In 1996, a few years after the EPRI reports, the insulated conductor industry determined that DC high
potential testing of the plastic (XLPE) insulation systems, either in the cable factory as a routine
production test or after installation as a high voltage proof test, were determined to be detrimental to the
life of the insulation and therefore discontinued recommending DC testing for plastic (XLPE) insulation
systems. In 2001, a new IEEE Guide for Field Testing and Evaluation of the Insulation of Shielded
Power Cable Systems, IEEE Std 400-2001 was released. The new standard includes statements
such as, testing of cables that have been aged in a wet environment (specifically XLPE) with DC at the
currently recommended DC voltages may cause the cable to fail after they are returned to service. These
failures would not have occurred at that point in time if the cables had remained in service and had not
been tested with DC. This standard also indicates other testing has shown that even massive insulation
defects in extruded dielectric insulation cannot be detected with DC at the recommended voltage levels.
Current versions of most industry recommendations no longer include DC high potential testing of
extruded cables (XLPE and EPR) as a maintenance test. Of those that still do, all have reduced the
Laminated insulation systems are not subject to the same aging characteristics as XLPE and EPR.
Therefore, DC testing is more accepted for acceptance and maintenance testing of paper insulated lead
covered cable (PILC). Keep in mind, however, the test has limitations. The DC leakage can be affected
by external factors such as heat, humidity, and water level, if unshielded and in ducts or conduits. It can
also be affected by internal heating if the cable under test had recently been heavily loaded. These
factors make comparisons of periodic data obtained under different test conditions very difficult. In
practice, the shape of the leakage curve, assuming constant voltage, is more important than either the
absolute leakage current of a go-no-go withstand test result.
As the name implies, this test method is based on using alternating current (ac) at the operating
frequency (50/60 Hz) of the system as the test source. This method has the advantage of stressing the
insulation comparably to normal operating conditions. Power frequency high potential testing is most
commonly conducted by cable manufacturers. The withstand testing determines the dielectric strength of
the insulation system and identifies gross defects. The test looks at the bulk of the insulation and renders
a pass or fail conclusion. A further advantage of power frequency testing is that it allows partial discharge
and dissipation factor (tan ) testing for diagnostic purposes.
It should be noted that power frequency testing methods can be categorized as withstand or diagnostic.
In withstand testing, insulation defects are caused to break down (fault) at the time of testing. Faults are
repaired or removed, and the insulation is retested until it passes the withstand test. The withstand test is
considered a destructive test. Diagnostic testing allows the identification of the relative condition of
degradation of a cable system and establishes, by comparison with figures of merit, if a cable system can
or cannot continue operation. Diagnostic testing is considered nondestructive.
As a field test power frequency testing suffers a series disadvantage since at increased voltage levels the
test sets require heavy, bulky and expensive transformers. Field portable AC high potential test sets of
the power frequency variety are used worldwide for field testing vacuum bottles, switchgear, reclosures,
circuit breakers, etc. Field portable units will typically offer ratings of 3 to 7 kVA and will be portable and
cost effective for the applications mentioned.
The reason for large transformers when referring to cable testing has to do with the capacitance of the
load being tested. Capacitive reactance (Xc) changes as a function of frequency as seen in formula:
1
Xc =
2fC
Therefore, if we are testing a 15 kV rated cable of approximately 10,000 feet the capacitance would be
around 1uF. Based on the formula the capacitive reactance at 60 Hz would be 2654 ohms:
1
2654 =
6.28 (60 1E6 )
To apply the IEEE recommended 22 kV test voltage, it would require a power supply rated for 8.3 amps,
or 183 kVA:
22,000 (Volts)
8.3 amps =
2,654 (Ohms, Xc)
The size of the necessary equipment can be substantially reduced by using the principle of resonance. If
the effective capacitance of the cable is resonated with an inductor, the multiplying effect of the resonant
circuit (its Q factor, presently between 50 and 120) will allow the use of a smaller test source. In the ideal
case of a perfect resonance, the test source will only be required to supply energy to balance the true
resistive loss in the inductor and cable system. One of two resonant circuits is normally used, either
series or parallel. Even with the application of resonance, these power frequency high voltage supplies
can be quite large and heavy, requiring dedicated test vehicles to transport to and from field job sites.
Similar to power frequency test methods; if used alone, VLF testing is considered a Type 1, go-no-go test,
but can be used with auxiliary equipment for the purpose of Type 2, diagnostic testing. Auxiliary
equipment can be partial discharge and/or dissipation factor (tan ) couplers and measurement
equipment.
The main advantage of testing at very low frequency is that it significantly reduces the size, weight and
cost of the required power supply and thus offers greater attraction for field testing of medium voltage
cables. If the test frequency were dropped to 0.1 Hz, the capacitive reactance, as calculated earlier,
becomes 1.6 megohms. The same 22 kV would now only draw 14 mA or 0.303 kVA. Therefore, the size,
weight and portability of the power supply become very convenient for field use. VLF power supplies can
be constructed as either a cosine-pulse (rectangular) waveform or sinusoidal waveform output.
The cosine-pulse waveform version is constructed using a DC test set that acts as the high-voltage
source. A DC to AC converter then changes the DC voltage to the VLF AC test signal. The converter
consists of a high-voltage inductor (choke) and a rotating rectifier that changes the polarity of the cable
system being tested every 5 seconds. This generates a 0.1-Hz bipolar wave. A resonance circuit,
consisting of a high-voltage inductor and a capacitor in parallel with the cable capacitance, assures
sinusoidal polarity changes in the power frequency range. The use of a resonance circuit to change cable
voltage polarity preserves the energy stored in the cable system. Only leakage losses have to be supplied
to the cable system during the negative half of the cycle.
The intent of the VLF cosine-pule waveform test is to generates a 0.1-Hz bipolar pulse wave that changes
polarity sinusoidally. Sinusoidal transitions in the power frequency range will then initiate a partial
discharge at an insulation defect, which the 0.1-Hz pulse wave develops into a breakdown channel.
During the test period, typically within minutes, a defect can be detected and forced to break through.
After the defect breaks through and faults, it can then be located with standard, readily available cable
fault locating equipment. Identified faults can then be repaired during the scheduled outage. When a
cable system passes the VLF test, it can be returned to service. The recommended testing time periods
range from 15 to 60 minutes.
Advantages Disadvantages
The sinusoidal transitions in the power When testing cables with extensive water
frequency range can initiate a partial tree damage or ionization of the insulation,
discharge at an insulation defect. The 0.1- VLF testing alone is often not conclusive.
Hz pulse wave can then develop the defect
into a breakthrough channel faulting the
defect during the scheduled outage.
The VLF test set generates sinusoidally changing waves that are less than 1 Hz (0.1 Hz, 0.05 Hz or 0.02
Hz). When the local field strength at a cable defect exceeds the dielectric strength of the insulation,
partial discharge starts. The local field strength is a function of applied test voltage, defect geometry, and
space charge. After initiation of partial discharge, the partial discharge channels develop into
breakthrough channels within the applied test period. When a defect is forced to break through, it can
then be located with standard, fault locating equipment during the scheduled outage. VLF testing guides
usually recommended a test time duration of 60 minutes or less.
Advantages Disadvantages
Cables are tested with an AC voltage up to When testing cables with extensive water
three times the normal phase to ground tree damage or ionization of the insulation,
voltage. After initiation of a partial VLF testing alone is often not conclusive.
discharge, a breakthrough channel at a
cable defect develops very rapidly and can
be located during a scheduled outage.
Due to continuous polarity changes, space The total charging energy of the cable has
charges cannot develop and therefore no to be supplied and dissipated by the test in
new defects will be initiated during the every electrical period. This limits the size
testing process of the cable system that can be tested.
Cables can be tested with an AC voltage
up to three times the normal phase-to-
ground voltage with a device comparable in
size, weight, and power requirements to a
DC test set.
Due to the sinusoidal regulated waveform
and to the highest electrical tree growth
rate as compared to the cosine-rectangular
waveform, electrical trees will be initiated at
a defect within minutes.
The test voltage level and waveform is
defined as RMS voltage and is completely
independent of the cable length.
According to the IEEE 400.2 standard for acceptance testing cables ranging from 5 kV - 35 kV cables
which are tested between 2 Vo and 3 Vo (phase to ground); 68% of the failures occurred within 12
minutes, 89% within 30 minutes, 95% after 45 minutes and 100% after 1 hour. These results were found
using both types of power supply waveforms, the sinusoidal and cosine-rectangular with the most
commonly used being the sinusoidal waveform.
Dissipation factor, also called Tan or Loss Angle, testing, is a diagnostic method of testing cables to
determine the quality of the cable insulation. This is done to try to predict the remaining life expectancy
and in order to prioritize cable replacement and/or
injection. It is also useful for determining what other
tests may be worthwhile. Such as VLF Withstand or
Partial Discharge.
We need to keep in mind that the goal of tan testing is to provide a quality/reliability indication of an
insulating system. In a cabling system the terminations and splices are part of that system. If the
insulation of that system and all accessories are free from defects, like water trees, electrical trees,
moisture and air pockets, etc., the cabling system approaches the properties of a perfect capacitor as
stated earlier. It should also be noted that in the event the cable circuit has transitions between multiple
insulation types, for example XLPE transitioned to EPR, the Tan value will be influenced by the
When analyzing Tan results we look at the stability of the Tan reading at a given test voltage, the
absolute value of Tan and the gradient of change in the Tan value as test voltage is increased.
Table 2
Typical Ranges for Standard Deviations, TD Gradient and TD Values for Various
Insulation Types (G = Good / M = Monitor / A = Action Required)
CABLE TD Std. Dev. (%) TD Gradient (E-3) TD Value
TYPE (1.5Vo 0.5Vo) (E-3)
G M A G M A G M A
It is important to note that Tan does not locate defects in cabling systems, it simply gives an indication
of the insulation quality between point A and B in the system. Tan test results may justify conducting
other analysis such as time domain reflectometry (TDR) or offline Partial Discharge analysis and mapping
to uncover possible locations of contamination and ionization.
Unfortunately, there is not an extensive library of test values for all types of cables and
accessories. Testing is typically done on a comparative basis. Keep in mind that the purpose of the test
is to grade cables tested on a scale from high quality to low. The point in the testing is to help an asset
owner to prioritize cable replacement or injection comparative testing will show which cables are worse
than others.
While it is beneficial to have previous tests to compare to for trending purpose, it is not absolutely
necessary. The very first test on a cable will render valuable information. If the cables insulation is in
good condition, the Tan will change little as the applied voltage is increased. The capacitance and loss
will be similar with 0.5 Vo or 1.5 Vo applied to the cable. If there is contamination changing the
capacitive/resistive nature of the insulation, then the Tan will be higher at higher test voltages.
A Tan measurement system consists of a high voltage divider and measurement circuit. The high
voltage divider measures the voltage and current input to the cable, sends this information to the
controller, which analyzes the voltage and current waveforms and calculates the Tan number.
A voltage supply is required to energize the cable under test to the desired test voltage(s). Although
power frequency can be used, and is used in factory testing, VLF is typically the chosen power supply for
IR 1
Tan = =
IC 2fCR
(Tan is measured in radians)
PARTIAL DISCHARGE
A Partial Discharge (PD) is an electrical discharge or spark that bridges a small portion of the insulation
between two conducting electrodes. PD activity can occur at any point in the insulation system, where
the electric field strength exceeds the breakdown strength of that portion of the insulating material.
Simplified models of voids in insulating systems have been described as consisting of capacitance only.
When we review the progressive failure mode of these voids we can also see semiconducting films inside
the voids. These films can also consist of carbonization of organic insulation material within the void due
to the arching damage caused by partial discharge. Therefore the model of the partial discharge void is
similar to that of the insulation medium itself and can be represented as a capacitance and resistance in
parallel.
Actual failure modes have indicated a drop in partial discharge intensity shortly prior to complete failure in
solid dielectrics. This occurs when the internal arcing had carbonized to the point where the resistive
component of the partial discharge void model was low enough to prevent a build-up of voltage across
the void. This newly formed low resistive component would allow higher current to flow and additional
heating and resultant insulation degradation. The partial discharge void model, including the resistive
component correlates to the actual failure mode of a partial discharge void, where the resistive
component passes more leakage current as the partial discharges increase with time.
PD Characteristics
If both sides of the void have similar insulation materials then the charge distribution will be equal during
the positive and negative cycles. In theory, there will be two observable PD pulses in each AC cycle of
equal magnitude and opposite polarity per void within the bulk of the insulation. These pulses clump at
the classic positions for phase-to-ground dependent pulses, that is, negative pulses at 45 degrees and
the positive pulses at 225 degrees with reference to the 50/60Hz phase-to-ground voltage.
Cables that develop delamination of the insulation shield result in a void near the metallic shield. As with
those voids near the copper conductors, these discharges occur between electrodes made of different
materials. Here, the immobile positive charges on the insulation and mobile negative charges on the
For partial discharge to occur, a sufficient voltage must be applied to the system under test to meet the
minimum voltage required to start partial discharge activity. This is known as the partial discharge
inception voltage (PDIV). Once the PDIV has been reached, voltage may be lowered and PD will remain
present at the lower voltages until finally they extinguish at what is referred to as the partial discharge
extinction voltage (PDEV). The PDEV is therefore less than the PDIV. If the PDEV voltage level is lower
than the system operating voltage (phase-to-ground) this implies that an over voltage surge on the
insulating system could initiate PD, and then even when the system voltage returns to normal, the PD
activity may continue. Partial discharge activity that can continue at operating voltage is therefore more
likely to result in an insulation failure than PD that extinguishes above normal operating voltage. Provided
that PD activity occurs at the operating voltage level it can be detected and/or measured through online
detection methods and therefore testing for partial discharge activity can be performed either online at
operating voltage levels or offline at test voltage levels.
Online PD testing has the obvious advantage in that it does not require disconnecting or an outage. The
main disadvantage when testing cables under operation is that the test is only performed at the operating
voltage level and cannot be adjusted. Obviously if the applied voltage is fixed and cannot be changed the
PDIV and PDEV voltages cannot be determined and therefore, in comparison to offline testing, where
voltages can be adjusted to simulate transients or other over voltage conditions, a lower percentage of
defects in the cables insulating system can be detected through online methods.
As stated earlier; for partial discharge to occur, a sufficient voltage must be applied to the system under
test to meet the minimum voltage required to start partial discharge activity. When testing cables the
online testing approach uses the system voltage of a constant fixed magnitude. In an offline approach a
temporary voltage source will be required. Considerations for an offline voltage source should include:
The applied voltage should cause partial discharges in the insulating system under test that have
characteristics close, if not identical, to those that occur when the insulating system is in service.
The temporary voltage source should cause no appreciable damage to the insulating system
during the time required to perform the measurements.
The temporary voltage source should have a variable voltage output so that PDIV and PDEV
tests can be performed.
The size and weight of the equipment required to produce the voltage levels required for testing
various assets needs to be considered. Is the equipment to be used in a fixed location or used in
a field application?
Voltage sources that are used for commercially available field partial discharge measurement systems will
fall into the general categories of power frequency and alternative voltage sources such as Very Low
Frequency (VLF).
Depending on the type of defect, sinusoidal VLF voltage sources, usually 0.1 Hz, for extruded dielectric
systems may require a higher test voltage to generate the same partial discharge level compared with
tests performed with power-frequency voltages. For example, the conductivity of the surface of a cavity
that has been exposed to PD increases, which allows any charges deposited on the surface by PD to
leak away and thus lowers the electric field in the cavity. As more charge can leak away between polarity
A VLF cosine-pulse waveform generates a 0.1 Hz bipolar pulse wave that changes polarity sinusoidally.
Since the sinusoidal transitions are in the power frequency range the PDIV measurement will be
comparable to power frequency. The VLF cosine-pulse voltage work according to the principle of 50/60
Hz Slope Technology. This is particularly important for PD diagnosis, since reliable evaluation of the
measured results requires a direct comparability with the power frequency. Partial discharge
characteristics change in the case of large
frequency differences, making reliable evaluation
to power frequency impossible. The 50/60 Hz
Slope Technology ensures comparability for both
voltage wave shapes.
Another approach to reduce the size and weight of the test voltage supply from that of a conventional
power frequency supply is the Damped AC Voltage (DAC) technique. For the purpose of partial
discharge analysis, the cable under test is charged to the pre-selected peak value by a direct current high
voltage source within a couple of seconds and afterwards shorted with an electronic switch via a
resonance coil. Thus a sinusoidal oscillating AC voltage with low damping is created. The frequency is
fixed in a range from 50 Hz to several 100 Hz, depending on the capacitance of the test object. Since the
frequency of the test voltage is close to
nominal service conditions, all measured PD
activities can be effectively evaluated and
compared to that of power frequency.
Noise Influence
When PD activity occurs, high frequency current pulses are created and will propagate along the cable.
These high frequency current pulses will propagate in both directions along the cable and can used to
locate the PD activity.
In most industrial facilities, a large portion of the cables are of the tape shield design where overlapping
layers of copper tape are wrapped around the insulation shield of the cable. In addition a widespread use
of EPR insulation is found in industrial plants. In contrast, the electrical utility distribution sector tends to
use concentric neutral wires instead of tape design for the ground shields and XLPE for the insulation.
The concentric neutral wires hold certain advantage as the cable matures and begins to show signs of
service age. As tape shielded cable ages and corrosion of the copper tape occurs, particularly at the
overlap of the consecutive tape layers, the cable starts to attenuate high frequencies. Even with slight
corrosion of the overlapping layers, the cable shield starts to behave as a coil or inductor to high
frequencies. The net effect of this attenuation is that a PD detection system connected to a cable may
not always detect the high frequency PD pulse as it would be so attenuated by the time it reaches the PD
monitoring equipment. The further away the detection equipment is from the active PD site, the more
severe this limitation. This limits the effectiveness of partial discharge testing on tape shielded cable.
SUMMARY
As we had seen there are numerous insulation tests to assist in assessing the quality and condition of a
cables insulation. The pass/fail tests provide the means of identifying gross defects while the diagnostic
tests provide us with an understanding of the severity of degradation or the extent of contamination in the
insulation.
Technology and philosophies toward testing have advanced over the past twenty years and push toward
predictive maintenance solutions. A key element in predictive maintenance is monitoring the trend of
diagnostic test results. Not all tests are appropriate to all circumstances and neither can any single test
give you the complete answer. Each type of test serves as a window looking into the condition of the
cable and by putting together a number of different tests you build a more complete picture.