Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Question 1
A)
Level of fine Probability Expected present value
500000 0.3 500000 x 0.3
= 150000
1400000 0.5 1400000 x 0.5
= 700000
2000000 0.2 2000000 x 0.2
= 400000
Total: 1250000
B)
Year 0 1 2 3 4
New (1000000)
equipment
cost
Government 250000
grant
Commissio (50000)
n to
Simmons &
Tilton
Production (315000) (330750) (347287.5) (364651.875)
cost
Net Cash (1000000) (115000) (330750) (347287.5) (364651.875)
flow
PVIF 1.0000 0.8929 0.7972 0.7118 0.6355
(12%,n)
PV (1000000) (102683.5) (263673.9) (247199.2425) (231736.2666)
NPV (1845292.909)
No, because the project would cost more than the fine.
C) Toxxikon Co. can try to adjust the product price in order to cover the higher
production cost. Toxxikon Co. may also try to look for alternative project with similar
effect and evaluate both projects. Another factor that Toxxikon Co. may consider is their
relationship with customers and investors. Toxxikon Co. also need to consider the future
investment after the equipment working life ended. One more factor that Toxxikon Co.
can take for consideration is the capabilities of their workforce on handling the new
equipment.
Question 2
A i)
Company Required rate of return
Zico Ltd 0.045 + [2.1 (0.11-0.045) ]
= 0.1815
= 18.15%
Kojun Ltd 0.045 + [1.08 (0.11-0.045) ]
= 0.1152
= 11.52%
Xinal Ltd 0.045 + [0.91 (0.11-0.045) ]
= 0.10415
= 10.415%
Shenang Ltd 0.045 + [1.58 (0.11-0.045) ]
= 0.1477
= 14.77%
B) Richtoo plcs portfolio is overpriced. In the portfolio, Kojun Ltd is the overpriced
stocks. The remaining company stock is underpriced. To obtain higher return in the
portfolio, Richtoo plc could sell Kojun Ltd and invest it into Zico Ltd as its expected and
required rate of return differs the most. Alternatively, Richtoo plc could find another
company to add into the portfolio as a replacement of Kojun Ltd and keep the
diversification of the portfolio.
Part B
Question 3
A i) Net Income
Worst case scenario ($55000) & 200,000 ordinary shares and $200,000 of 10%
debentures at par:
Profit before interests & taxes 55000
Less: Interest on debentures (10%) 20000
Profit before taxes 35000
Less: Corporate taxes (35%) 12250
Net Income 22750
Worst case scenario ($55000) & 50,000 ordinary shares and $350,000 of 10% debentures
at par:
Profit before interests & taxes 55000
Less: Interest on debentures (10%) 35000
Profit before taxes 20000
Less: Corporate taxes (35%) 7000
Net Income 13000
Expected Average Outcome ($95000) & 50,000 ordinary shares and $350,000 of 10%
debentures at par:
Best Possible Outcome ($140000) & 200,000 ordinary shares and $200,000 of 10%
debentures at par:
B) Proposing 400,000 ordinary shares would result in highest net income but the lowest
EPS spread among the shareholder. Proposing 200,000 ordinary shares and $200,000 of
10% debentures at par would result in lower net income but higher EPS when compare
with offering 400,000 ordinary shares. Proposing 50,000 ordinary shares and $350,000 of
10% debentures at par will result in lowest net income but provide the highest EPS to
shareholder among these three proposal.
Hence, offering 50,000 ordinary shares and $350,000 of 10% debentures at par is the best
proposal as it allow investor to enjoy higher EPS.
Question 4
A) Maximus Ltd
= 80000000
= $112000000
B) EBIT = 25000000
Maximus Ltd
= 0.2031
= 0.1451
= 14.51%
= 111991729.8
Minimus Ltd
= 120741729.8
= 118991729.8
ii) Market value of equity = 118991729.8 20000000
= 98991729.8
= 0.1484
= 14.84%
= 0.1436
= 14.36%