You are on page 1of 3

Humane-IT-y

www.Licencide13.com
Legalism Insider Charlatans Extraordinary Nescient Citizens Incomprehensibly Dumber Enhanced
Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis
DTR
Dead To Rights
PANDEMIC
Publicly Admitted Nescient Delusional Endemic Monetary Interests Conundrum
Initiative to raise the illegitimate
Legal Aid Coffers
SIN
Self Interest Nuance
causing oversight of the majoritys equal rights to an
equivalent
(equal costs)
fair trial that would throw a kink in their
EATS
Elitist Advantaged Treasury Sanctum
Shadow Government
SG
Sustainable Growth
LS
Legal System
Dependent on Sustainable Growth of the Criminal Element
Contrary to a sane approach as in everyone is presumed innocent in of with the
Spirit Of Law
And the Legal System mandatory obligation to maintain the
SOS
Sanctity Of Spirit
with
DR
Due Regard
to
CED
Criminal Element Deterrence
That of course would be contrary to
ST B
Sustainable Thriving Business
ACME
Applying Competent Manifest Exercise
Ergo
ACNE
Applying Competent Nefarious Exercise
ST BEE
Sustainable Thriving Business Elitist Exploitation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/166531506/Done-What-I-Can-to-Save-World-Ball-Now-in-Your-Court
Excerpts
"We believe that the right of vulnerable citizens to legal assistance is an important component of the administration
of justice in a free and democratic society," the Treasurer said.

"Since the Ontario Legal Aid Plan was founded in 1967, the Law Society has recognized that legal aid should be
considered a right, not a charitable gift, and that individuals

are equal before the law


only

if they are assured the option of legal representation."


We are alarmed by the dramatic increase in the number of people who try to represent themselves in court without the
benefit of legal representation or advice about their rights.
Others simply give up their right to a fair hearing. For all of these people, access to justice is denied."

What Ontario lawyers perceived in the 1920s, what the Joint Committee expressed in the 1960s,
and what many people experience first-hand in Ontario courts every day, is that

Individuals are equal before the law only if they are assured
the option of representation by counsel.
In a democratic society, everyone should be able to participate fully in society and
have their rights protected.
Canada has an adversarial justice system that anticipates two roughly equal parties presenting their cases before a
judge in a court of law.
What happens if there is an imbalance of power between the two parties?
When an Ontarian cannot afford to hire a lawyer,
an imbalance of power exists,

especially
when the state is one of the parties,
as in criminal law and child protection cases. Legal aid attempts to correct this imbalance by providing low-income
individuals with legal representation.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and
has the right to the equal protection
and
equal benefit of the law
without discrimination
and, in particular,
without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age
or
mental or physical disability.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113882977/Spirit-Intent-Precedence-de-Jure-Constitution-or-
Romans-13-Gaming-the-System-de-Facto

https://www.scribd.com/doc/145588734/Bar-to-Bar-Justice-Causes-
Eccentric-to-Saddle-Up-to-the-Bar

http://www.scribd.com/doc/193705218/A-Corporation-is-Considered-by-
the-Law-to-Exist-as-a-Legal-Person

http://www.scribd.com/doc/105694093/RCMP-Sarge-States-Apparently-I-
Thought-Were-Actually-Going-to-Investigate-Government-Corruption-as-
Per-Complaint

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53187051/To-United-Nations

You might also like