Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Editorial board
Geert Claassens (Leuven)
Hans Cools (Leuven)
Pieter De Leemans (Leuven)
Brian Patrick McGuire (Roskilde)
Baudouin Van den Abeele (Louvain-la-Neuve)
KU LEUVEN
INSTITUTE FOR MEDIEVAL AND RENAISSANCE STUDIES
LEUVEN (BELGIUM)
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Edited by
Carlos STEEL
John MARENBON
Werner VERBEKE
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
All rights reserved. Except in those cases expressly determined by law, no part of this
publication may be multiplied, saved in an automated data file or made public in any way
whatsoever without the express prior written consent of the publishers.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Introduction IX
Ludo MILIS
The Spooky Heritage of Ancient Paganisms 1
Carlos STEEL
De-paganizing Philosophy 19
John MARENBON
A Problem of Paganism 39
Henryk ANZULEWICZ
Albertus Magnus ber die philosophi theologizantes und die
natrlichen Voraussetzungen postmortaler Glckseligkeit:
Versuch einer Bestandsaufname 55
Marc-Andr WAGNER
Le cheval dans les croyances germaniques entre paganisme
et christianisme 85
Brigitte MEIJNS
Martyrs, Relics and Holy Places: The Christianization of the
Countryside in the Archdiocese of Rheims during the Merov-
ingian Period 109
Edina BOZOKY
Paganisme et culte des reliques: le topos du sang vivifiant la
vgtation 139
Rob MEENS
Thunder over Lyon: Agobard, the tempestarii and Christianity 157
Robrecht LIEVENS
The pagan Dirc van Delf 167
Stefano PITTALUGA
Callimaco Esperiente e il paganesimo 195
Anna AKASOY
Paganism and Islam: Medieval Arabic Literature on Religions
in West Africa 207
Index 239
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
A PROBLEM OF PAGANISM
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
[We came to a meadow of fresh grass. There were people with slow, seri-
ous eyes, great authority in their faces. They spoke rarely, with sweet
voices. Dante, Inferno IV, 111-4]
1. Inferno IV, 34-8: ei non peccaro; e selli hanno mercedi/non basta, perch non
ebber battesmo,/ch porta de la fede che tu credi;/ e se furon dinanzi al cristianesmo,/
non adorar debitamente a Dio ; Purgatorio VII, 7-8: e per null altro rio/ lo ciel
perdei, che per non avere f.
2. This was the view of a number of commentators and scholars (cf. A. A. Ianucci,
Limbo: the emptiness of time, Studi danteschi, 52, 1979-80, 80). In a subtle and quali-
fied form it is adopted at the end of Kenelm Fosters nuanced study of the whole issue in
The Two Dantes (Berkeley and Los Angeles; University of California Press, 1977): see
pp. 249-52, and, although he would not use the phrase sin of omission, the same under-
lying view is held by C. OConnell Baur in Dantes Hermeneutics of Salvation. Passages
to freedom in the Divine Comedy (Toronto, Buffalo and London; University of Toronto
Press, 2007, 172 244. Baur gives a very full survey of the different alternative approaches
to Virgil and his damnation.
3. See M. Allan, Does Dante hope for Virgils Salvation, Modern Languages Notes,
104 (1989), 193-205; and the critical exchange that followed between T. Bartolini and
him: Modern Languages Notes, 105 (1990), 138-49; cf. Baur, Dantes Hermeneutics,
195-9.
4. Ianucci, Limbo, advances this type of view, though stressing the tragic nature of
Virgils fate.
5. On the theological novelty of Dantes idea, see especially G. Padoans Il Limbo
dantesca as reprinted with bibliographical additions in his Il pio Enea, lempio Ulisse.
Tradizione classica e intendimento medievale in Dante (Ravenna: Longo, 1977), 103-24.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
The tension which forced Dante into this perhaps rather unhappy com-
promise is a striking example of what, at one stage in thinking about the
issue, I called The Problem of Paganism. It is one form, particular to
medieval Christendom, of a general problem about how to regard other
religions and ways of life, the problem of other faiths a problem that
has always faced, and still faces, any reflective believer in a religion that
makes the exclusive claims characteristic of Christianity. Christianity
makes exclusive and universal claims, based on a historical revelation,
and they have the most serious consequences with regard to a persons
supposed destiny after death. Whereas ancient Romans, could readily
accept new Gods into their pantheon, the Christian God is a jealous one.
His adherents must be loyal to him alone, and they must accept his teach-
ing as the ultimate truth about the origins and purpose of the universe
and the goals of human life. Some of these truths can be known by rea-
son and experience, but almost all Christians have considered that there
are some truths known to humans only through a historical revelation.6
Moreover, the message of Christianity is universal, and so is the claim it
makes for adherence. Failure to heed it has eschatological consequences
of a hardly imaginable severity: an eternity of torture in place of the pos-
sibility of an eternal heavenly life of complete happiness.
From these elements, the following problem emerged in the Latin-
based culture of medieval Western Christendom: Many people are not,
and have not been Christians. During a whole, long historical period
from the earliest times up until the life of Christ Christianity was una-
vailable to anyone, at least in an obvious and explicit way. Since then,
there have been many parts of the world where, for long periods, Chris-
tianity was unknown; and many parts of the world where, although
Christianity is known, other religions so dominate that very few people
become Christians. On the face of it, then, the large numbers (indeed, the
On the normal medieval theology of limbo, see A. Carpin, Il limbo nella teologia medi-
evale (Bologna; ESD, 2006).
6. Some of these characteristics of Christianity also belong to Judaism and Islam,
though clearly not all: Judaism, for instance, does not claim to be a universal religion.
Moreover, a feature that distinguishes the medieval Islamic and Jewish traditions of phi-
losophy is that they contain, as a very important strand, adopted by some thinkers, the idea
that a philosophical understanding of the universe, gained through reason, is the fullest
and most correct one, and divine revelation serves a more practical, political purpose,
providing clear laws for the whole of society and teaching truths in a less precise, but
more easily graspable metaphorical manner. Christian thinkers could hardly follow such
an approach, given the centrality of doctrines which many would consider mysteries not
even open to rational understanding, let alone rational discovery.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
great majority) of people, now and in the past, who were or are not
Christians, must be considered to be living in alienation from the true
God, not knowing or rejecting the revealed truths they need to under-
stand their world and live well, and heading for eternal punishment. Yet
this view implies a sharp moral and intellectual distinction between
Christian and non-Christian societies and individuals which goes against
all the evidence: non-Christian societies and individuals are not, overall,
obviously and grossly more evil and ignorant than Christian ones. More-
over, this view apparently implies that God, whom Christians hold to be
perfectly good, will condemn many people to eternal punishment,
because of when or where they happened to have been born.
The specific form of problem, found within medieval Latin Christian
culture has three further, distinctive features: the rarity of the problem,
its difficulty, and its special links with literature and philosophy. The
first two are closely linked. Nowadays, the problem I have just articu-
lated is a central concern for most Christians. But, as such, it has been
so thoroughly accommodated within accepted doctrine that it is no longer
a problematic concern on the theoretical level. It is widely and accepted,
in the various Churches, that non-Christians can live excellent lives,
achieve a high degree of understanding of themselves and their world,
and be saved.7 By contrast, most medieval Christians, even thinkers and
writers, were either unconcerned with non-Christians or hostile to them.
But for those medieval intellectuals it touched a small number, but
including some of the outstanding figures of the epoch, such as Abelard
and Dante this Problem of Paganism had the character of a dilemma.
Although the lines of Christian doctrine were not rigid, they certainly did
not allow for the easy acceptance of non-Christian excellence common
today. The Problem of Paganism, then, placed a difficult choice before
medieval writers: either to be bolder (sometimes dangerously bolder)
than their contemporaries in adapting theological teaching, or else to
arrive at a judgement of non-Christians and their achievements at odds
with their ordinary moral intuitions and assessment of the evidence. Had
the only non-Christians they knew been of their own time, it is perhaps
unlikely that even a small group of medieval Christians would have
7. F.A. Sullivan, Salvation outside the Church? Tracing the History of the Catholic
Response (London; Chapman, 1992), traces how the contemporary Catholic was reached,
going back to the beginnings of Christianity. His broad but learned survey complements,
but does not replace for the period before the twentieth century the old, but still standard
work by L. Capran, Le Problme du salut des infidles. Essai historique, 2nd edn.
(Toulouse; Grande Sminaire, 1934).
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
faced up to such unpalatable alternatives. It was the fact that the great
writers and philosophers of Greece and Rome were pagans which meant
that, at least for some of the most cultivated and thoughtful medieval
intellectuals, there was a Problem of Paganism to be confronted, and
which linked the problem so closely to literary and philosophical
concerns.
Medieval literature and thought was the heir of Greek and Roman
antiquity. The authorities in philosophy were Plato and Aristotle; the
models for poetry were Latin writers such as Virgil and Ovid. The most
common attitude was to make use of these writings, without reflecting
explicitly on the fact that their authors were pagans. But, for the think-
ers willing to face the problem, there were occasions and contexts
where the fundamental difference in belief that separated them from
the classical writers they revered were all too obvious. How could
these authors, whom they so admired, have been so thoroughly mis-
taken in every important matter of understanding and behaviour as the
exclusive claims of Christian truth would, at first sight, suggest? The
question was made far sharper by the belief, held by many medieval
thinkers, that the great ancient philosophers and even some of the clas-
sical authors were, though pagans, monotheists, worshippers of the one
true God.
As my comments will have indicated, the Problem of Paganism I have
in mind is posed in a particularly sharp way by the question of the post-
mortem destiny of (apparently) virtuous pagans. The Problem itself,
though, is wider than this particular question. Indeed, it is not so much
the belief itself as to whether they are sent to Hell or reach Heaven that
matters as the judgement on their lives that lies behind it. If, as monothe-
ists, educated ancient pagans were in some sense worshippers of the true
God, how accurate was their grasp of him? Were their virtues real or, as
Augustine notoriously argued, merely apparent?
The following pages are designed to give the flavour of the medieval
discussions of this problem and to indicate some of the issues it raises.
They will also show how this problem, which is in the broad sense a
philosophical one and can involve the intricacies of medieval scholastic
theology, receives some of its subtlest discussions in vernacular poetry
rather than Latin university texts: exploring it invites us to re-think the
boundaries of what we describe as medieval philosophy and medieval
literature. As the title and my first sentence make clear, the problem
sketched here is a medieval problem about paganism: there are other,
more or less closely related problems for example, the questions,
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
8. The Trajan Gregory story in the Middle Ages has been discussed by a number of
scholars. The range of G. Paris, La Lgende de Trajan, Bibliothque de lcole des
hautes tudes, Sciences philolologiques et historiques, 35 (Paris; Vieweg, 1878), 261-98
has not been surpassed. More recent studies include P. Gradon, Trajanus Redivivus:
another look at Trajan in Piers Plowman, in Middle English Studies presented to Norman
Davis in Honour of his Seventieth Birthday, ed. D. Gray and E. G. Stanley (Oxford;
Oxford University press, 1983), 93 114 and G. Whatley, The Uses of Hagiography: the
legend of Pope Gregory and the Emperor Trajan in the Middle Ages, Viator, 15 (1984),
25-63.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
9. An account of the miracle is found in Greek in a work On Those who have Died in
the Faith (Patrologia Graeca 95, 247-78, at 262D-3A) mistakenly attributed to John of
Damascus and probably from the ninth century or earlier. According to this account,
Gregory poured out prayers for the forgiveness of the faults of Trajan and soon heard a
voice telling him his prayers had been granted.
10. The Earliest Life of Gregory the Great by an Anonymous Monk of Whitby, ed.
B. Colgrave (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1985), 126 (Chapter 29): Quidam
quoque de nostris dicunt narratum a Romanis, sancti Gregorii lacrimis animam Traiani
imperatoris refrigeratam vel baptizatam, quod est dictu mirabile et auditu. Quod autem
eum dicimus babtizatum, neminem moveat: nemo enim sine babtismo Deum videbit
umquam: cuius tertium genus est lacrimae
11. Ibid., 128: ad refrigerium animae eius quid implendo nesciebat, ingrediens ad
sanctum Petrum solita direxit lacrimarum fluenta usque promeruit sibi divinitus revelatum
fuisse exauditum, atque ut numquam de altero illud praesumpsisset pagano.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
prayers said for those who are damned. But in this account, the saintly
Gregory is supposed, not only to have sinned by praying for the salvation
of a damned soul, but to have been rewarded by having his prayer
answered. The discussion of this episode by theologians and writers over
the next seven centuries is occupied above all by trying to tidy up the
doctrinal mess left by this rather feckless monk. That Trajan had been
saved was taken as given. The question was how it could have happened,
given the constraints of Christian doctrine.
The rather strange explanation Dante gives involves the resuscitation
of Trajan, who in his brief second earthly life believes that God can help
him and is enflamed in such a fire of true love that he dies, for the sec-
ond time, in a state of grace. The story has the effect of removing the
challenge to orthodox Christian teaching which the legend of Trajans
salvation posed. By supposing the miracle of his resuscitation,
Trajans place in heaven can be explained uncontroversially, since he
died, for the second time, as a Christian in a state of grace. This explana-
tion was widely current in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Aqui-
nas favours it, as does Albert the Great, and it is one of the explanations
given in Jacob of Voragines very popular Legenda aurea (Chapter 46).12
Dante gives this common account his own twist, but it is a subtle one.
When the thirteenth and fourteenth-century scholastic theologians men-
tion Trajan, they are interested solely in the fact that he was sent to Hell
but, ultimately, was saved. They do not usually refer to the details of the
legend which make it clear that he was unusually virtuous: they are con-
cerned not with Trajans justice (some, indeed, such as Durandus of
St Pourain, portray him as rather evil13), but with divine justice; they
wish to show that God does not change his mind even if he seems to do
so, to consider the relationship between prayer and predestination, and
whether prayers can help those in Hell. So, for instance, after proposing
the brought-back-to-life-again version of the story, Aquinas writes:
Thus also it appears in all those who were miraculously raised from the
dead, of whom it is clear that many were idolaters and had been damned.
For about them all it needs similarly to be said that they had not been
12. Aquinas looks at the story in detail only in his commentary on the Sentences (I d.
43, q. 2, a. 2, ad 5); his reference to it in De veritate (q. 6, a. 6 ad 4) is brief and the
discussion in the Summa theologiae (supplem. q. 71, a. 5, ad 5) occurs in the section
compiled by his followers and merely repeats what is said in the Sentences commentary.
For Albert, see his late (1270) Summa theologiae I, tr. xi, q. 77.
13. See his Commentary on the Sentences IV. D. 45, q. 2 (ed. Venice, 1571, ff. 405v-
6v). He explains that Trajan had put many martyrs painfully to death.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
finally placed in Hell, but <they were there> according to the present jus-
tice with regard to their own merits, but according to superior causes, by
which it was foreseen that they would be recalled to life, they were to be
placed differently.14
It is part of Aquinass point here that Trajan and the others were not
worthy to be saved because of their personal merits: they are not in any
sense examples of just pagans.
Dantes emphasis is different. He is clearly identified as an example
of someone who died as a pagan and yet has been saved, and a telling of
the Trajan and the widow story in the Purgatorio (X, 73-93) has identi-
fied him as virtuous.15 Yet the connection between his virtue and his
salvation seems to be left deliberately tenuous. There is no cross-refer-
ence back to the widow story in the Paradiso. There is a brief reference
forward, to Trajans salvation, in the Purgatorio passage, but its phrasing
is striking: Trajan is the Roman ruler whose worth moved Gregory to
his great victory (del roman principato, il cui valore/ mosse Gregorio a
la sua gran vittoria: Purgatorio X, 74-5). This comment, like the longer
version of the story in the Paradiso, makes very clear the limits of
a pagans own ability gain salvation.16 Trajan owes it to his virtuous
behaviour towards the widow that the story of this deed moved Gregory
to intercede for him; although, in interceding successfully, Gregory was
not, in fact, changing Gods mind or defeating him. Dante is in effect
proposing that, while virtue is a necessary condition for some means to
be found whereby a pagan ends by being saved, it is very far from being
a sufficient condition. Trajan was not merely just; he was exceptionally
lucky. The same point emerges from the presentation of the figure with
whom he is twinned by Dante. Ripheus is a minor character in the
Aeneid, but Virgil describes his as iustissimus, and it is clearly this com-
ment that led Dante to include him in Paradise. But Ripheuss devotion
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
17. See City of God XVIII, 47, and cf. his Letter 102 and Capran, Le Salut, 130-1.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
just, merely because God has made that choice. Humans who judge oth-
erwise are merely showing their short-sightedness.
The character of this passage is brought out by comparison with two
passages that deal with a similar situation. One was written by Thomas
Aquinas only a few decades before:
If anyone brought up in this way [in the forests among the brute animals]
were to follow the guidance of his natural reason in seeking good and flee-
ing evil, it should be held most certainly that God would reveal to him
those things which are necessary to be believed, either through internal
inspiration or by sending someone to preach to him, as he sent Peter to
Cornelius.18
Abelard believed that (at all times, not just after the coming of Christ),
explicit knowledge of Christ was necessary in order to be saved, but he
makes clear here that all who are invincibly ignorant of the faith and who
18. De veritate, q. 14, a. 11, ad.1: Si enim aliquis taliter nutritus, ductum rationis
naturalis sequeretur in appetitu boni et fuga mali, certissime est tenendum, quod Deus ei
vel per internam inspirationem revelaret ea quae sunt necessaria ad credendum, vel
aliquem fidei predicatorem ad eum dirigeret, sicut misit Petrum ad Cornelium, Act. X.
19. Problemata Heloissa 13 (Patrologia Latina 178, 696A: Pietati quippe atque
rationi convenit, ut quicumque lege naturali creatorem omnium ac remuneratorem Deum
recognoscentes, tanto illi zelo adhaerent, ut per consensum, qui proprie peccatum dicitur,
eum nitantur nequaquam offendere, tales arbitremur minime damnandos esse: et quae
illum ad salutem necessum est addiscere, ante vitae terminum a Deo revelari sive per
inspirationem, sive per aliquem directum quo de his instruatur, sicut in Cornelio factum
esse legimus de fide Christi ac perceptione baptismi.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
follow natural law as best they can will have this necessary knowledge
communicated to them.20 Dantes view is far harsher not just than
Abelards, but even than Aquinass (in this case very similar) view.
The comparison can be extended, because in a work he wrote about
eight years earlier than this passage, the Theologia Christiana, Abelard
discusses the salvation of Trajan. Abelard was working against a context
rather different from Dantes. The story of Trajans resuscitation had not
yet been invented, and Abelards source for the legend was, not the
Whitby life, but the attempt by John the Deacon, late in the ninth cen-
tury, to bring some theological order to the anonymous hagiographers
comments.21 John tries to remove the scandal of Gregorys praying for
Trajans soul Gregory who himself had written that we should not pray
for dead pagans and unbelievers by fixing on the fact that the anony-
mous life claims only that Gregory wept. More important, he argues that
there is no reason to believe that Trajans soul was actually released from
Hell, but merely that it was spared the torments there a reading sup-
ported by some details of the anonymous account, but not by others (not,
for instance, by the idea of baptism by tears). Abelard may seem to
follow John closely, since he quotes the same verse from the Gospel of
John about the necessity of baptism and puts forward the same idea of
Trajan not going to heaven. But in fact Abelard marks out his own,
rather different position. He does not at all try to pretend that Gregory
only wept: it was because of the insistence of his prayers as well as the
abundance of his weeping that the miracles occurred. And, whereas John
rejects as entirely incredible the idea that Trajan was released from
Hell, Abelard confines himself to saying that
we are not thereby compelled to believe that his soul was allowed into
heaven, in case perhaps we might go against the words of Truth, in which
it is said: Unless a person is reborn out of water and the Spirit, he cannot
enter the Kingdom of God.
20. On Abelards requirement of explicit faith for salvation, see J. Marenbon, The
Philosophy of Peter Abelard (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1997), 328-9.
21. Vita S. Gregorii, Patrologia Latina 75, 104B-105C.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
a very difficult case for him, because Abelard rejects the possibility of
salvation by implicit faith. (Abelard thinks so because of his theory
of Christs work: only by knowing the example of Christs sacrifice of
his life to save his fellow humans can a person learn the altruism neces-
sary, on Abelards theory, in order to be saved). All who are saved must,
therefore, through revelation or inner inspiration, know about Christ and
his Passion. It is implausible that Trajan, a decided pagan at a time when
Christianity was starting to flourish, should have had knowledge and
yet even for him Abelard wants to suggest at least the possibility of sal-
vation (against John the Deacons dogmatic rejection of it). In the sim-
pler case of the philosophers who lived before the coming of Christ and
the spread of Christianity, Abelard is insistent that they were Christians
avant la lettre. For him, a Virgil conceived as Dante saw him would
have been admitted without any problem to heaven.
Dante elaborated the idea of limbo in order to soften the edges of the
gloomy picture he felt compelled to give of how the pagans he honoured
would fare in the ultimate, divinely appointed scheme of things. But the
comparison with an author writing two centuries earlier immediately
raises the question of why Dante, given his devotion to antiquity, could
not solve this problem so easily as Abelard had done. Part of the answer
may be that Dante found in the apparent unfairness of Virgils fate a
genuine lesson, missed he would think by Abelard, about the incommen-
surability of human and divine justice. But even such an awareness of
incommensurability would itself testify to a wider change of attitudes
between the twelfth and the fourteenth century, which led in general to
a hardening of attitudes towards the possibility that good pagans were
saved.22
Why did this change take place? I have no definite answer, and per-
haps it is not a question that admits of one. But two different lines of
thought may help to explain what happen. The first calls attention to the
parallels between the attitudes to ancient pagans and those towards vari-
ous groups that were in some sense marginalized or regarded as other by
medieval Christian society, such as Jews, lepers and homosexuals. There
is a definite move in these other, more immediate and practical cases,
towards harsher treatment in the course of the twelfth, thirteenth and
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
The point is emphasized a little later when the figure Ymaginatif, talk-
ing about Trajan, cites a verse from one of the Psalms, salvabitur vix
iustus in die iudicii (Hardly will the just person be saved on the Day of
Judgement) and argues, with impeccable logic that, if the just person is
hardly saved then he is, indeed, saved (ergo salvabitur). A Biblical
remark intended to point to the severity of Gods judgement is thus
turned, by taking it utterly literally, into a warrant that a persons justice
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
25. The discussion of Trajans salvation is found in B-Text, Passus XI, 140-70, Passus
XII, 210-11, 268-94; C-Text Passus XII, 73-94, Passus XIV, 199-271. For a different
reading (along with bibliography), see A. J. Minnis (Looking for a Sign in Essays in
Ricardian Literature in honour of J. A. Burrow, ed. A. J. Minnis, C. C. Morse and
T. Turville-Petre (Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1997), 142-78 at pp. 150-69, where
he cautions against the semi-pelagian reading that places emphasis on Trajans merits in
saving him he considers Langlands attitude to Trajan to be close to that which I have
suggested as Dantes. But Minnis perhaps underestimates the importance of Langlands
decision to leave out the resuscitation story.
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013
Reprint from "Paganism in the Middle Ages" - ISBN 978 90 5867 933 8 - Leuven University Press, 2013