Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 3
Gutenberg 1436
High-speed fabrication
High volume products
Low cost manufacturing
Flexible substrates, continuous web
Arbitrary size and shape
Integration in low-end products
Established technology
Machinery etc. know-how exist
VTT 2009
On the other hand
Additive methods
Waste reduction
Green issues
All together
Novel applications
Profit
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 4
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 5
100
Gravure
10 Offset lithography
Rotary screen
Flexography
1
Throughput (m/s)
0.1
Flatbed screen
0.01
Thermal transfer
Inkjet
1E-3
1E-4
Soft lithography
1E-5
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Resolution (m)
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 6
Gravure printing
2. Gravure Association of America, Gravure Process and Technology, Rochester NY, 2003 .
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 7
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 8
The image-elements, i.e., cells are engraved into the surface of the
printing cylinder whereas the non-image areas remain at the original level.
The engraved printing cylinder rotates in an ink fountain as a result of
which the entire printing cylinder is inked and flooded with ink.
Excess ink is then wiped off with a doctor blade such that ink remains only
in the cells.
Ink is then transferred directly onto the substrate in a printing nip under
pressure. The nip pressure is 1.5-5 MPa.
The ink transfer is often improved by creating an electric field across
the nip. This field lifts ink out of the cells into contact with the
substrate, thus improving the ink transfer. For example, the emptying
degree of the cells increases from 40-60 % to 80-95 % with ESA
(Electrostatic assist) system.
The ink layer is dried by evaporating the solvent with hot air. [1]
1. Kipphan, H., Handbook of print media. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. 1207 p.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 9
Gravure cylinders
The printing cylinder engraving:
electromechanically with a diamond stylus:
produces trapezoid-shaped as the stylus penetrates into
the copper coating of the printing cylinder
geometry of the cell depends on the stylus angle
the penetration depth of the stylus
laser-engraving:
produces round cells.
shape of the cell depends on the energy of the beam. [1,3]
Etching:
4. Sjblom, R.; Nordstrm, J.-E.P.; Erho, T.; Saari, J., Halftone rotogravure ink transfer
determinations on LWC paper. In: 58th Appita Annual Conference, Canberra, Australia, 2004.
p. 115-136.
5 .Hennig, G., Direct laser system for rotogravure printing. Gravure 15(2001)4. p. 58-61.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 10
Gravure cylinders
Laser-engraving improves the filling and emptying of the cells due to its
round shape.
Laser-engraved cells are finer and produced faster than
electromechanically engraved ones.
Laser-engraving requires the printing cylinder to be coated with zinc
instead of copper.
The cells have been engraved in a form of a matrix of smaller dots
(Extreme engraving). This allows a free adjustment of screen resolution,
cell shape and depth, and cell wall thickness and reduces the raggedness
of the printed lines. [3,6,7]
The main factors affecting the print quality and ink transfer are:
The ink viscosity, ink type, printing speed, cell geometry, screen
ruling (mesh=lines/cm), blade geometry, wiping parameters, nip
pressure, ESA level, cylinder properties, and substrate roughness,
pore structure as well as compressibility. [1]
Gravure inks have very low viscosity (5-25 mPas) since they have to be
able to flow in and out of the engraved cells at high speeds.
=> extremely thin ink layers are printed. The thickness of the ink layer is
typically 0.8-2 m but when UV-curing inks are used the thickness can be
up to 8 m. [1]
3. Rong, X.; Pekarovic, J.; Pekarovicova, A., Gravure printability from laser and electromechanically
engraved cylinder, In: 11th International Printing and Graphics Arts Conference, Toronto, Canada,
2002. p. 151-154.
6. Li, A., The Gravure Atom: An Evaluation of Cell Structure. Gravure 21(2007)3. p. 32-38.
7. Kunz, W., Ink transfer in gravure process. In: 27th Annual Technical conference of TAGA, 1975. p.
151-176.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 11
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 12
P3HT
Mixture of solvents with high and low boiling points
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 13
Flexography printing
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 15
The image elements of the printing plate are raised above the non-
image elements, forming a relief pattern of the printed image.
Printing ink is applied onto the image elements via an anilox roller
that has small cells engraved evenly onto its surface.
The surface of the anilox roller is first flooded with ink from an ink
chamber after which excess ink is removed with a doctor blade.
As a result, ink remains only in the cells.
Ink is then transferred onto the raised image elements of the plate
and further onto the substrate.
The nip pressure is 0.1-0.5 MPa.
The plate is made of soft and flexible material which improves the
contact formation at the ink transfer points.
The ink layer is then dried with hot air. [1]
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 16
Anilox rolls
10. Jones, K.; Kent, P.; Bingham, J.; Burgess, D., Anilox roll screen and volume: history, trends and proper selection. Flexo
32(2007)5. p. 18-23.
11. Roffers, R. J., What you werent told about your anilox sleeve! Flexo 31(2006)10. p. 45-47 .
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 17
12. Hahn, L. M., Variables in printability and ink transfer in flexography. Ink Maker 81(2003)4. p. 46-50.
13. Galton, D., Photopolymer plate characterization. In: 52th Annual Technical Conference of TAGA, Ashville, NC, USA, 2002. p. 109-127.
14. Galton, D., Platemaking technologies and trends. Flexo, 32(2007)1. p. 44-48.
15. Cherry, J.; Claypole, T. C.; Gethin, D. T., Measurement of the ink release from the anilox roll. In: 58th Annual Technical Conference of
TAGA, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. p. 395-408.
16. Bould, D.C.; Hamblyn, S.M.; Claypole, T.C.; Bohan, M.F.J., The effect of process characteristics on image reproduction in flexographic
printing. In: 33rd International research conference of IARIGAI, Leipzig, Germany, 2006.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 18
Flexography
The factors affecting the ink transfer and print quality are:
the cell geometry of the anilox roller, anilox roller type, ink
viscosity, plate material, plate imaging, printing speed, nip
pressure, and substrate properties. [1,15,16]
Flexographic printing inks have low viscosity of 10-200 mPa s
contributing to the ink flow and improving the ink transfer. The ink
layer thickness is 0.8-1 m but with UV inks the thickness can be
2.5 m. Recent developments in the laser engraving have
increased the ink layer thickness to 6-8 m. [1]
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 19
Offset printing
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 20
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 21
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 22
Offset plates
Offset printing plates are typically made of aluminium that is coated with a
photopolymer layer.
The photopolymer layer cross-links as it is exposed to UV radiation. The
unexposed material can be then washed off with solvents.
After development, the plate is protected and strengthened by gumming
and baking.
CTP plates are today popular since they eliminate the need of page films.
However, these plates are more expensive but due to their sensitivity the
exposure time and energy are greatly reduced.
Nowadays, also thermal, chemistry-free, and process-less CTP plates are
gaining popularity. These plates improve the print quality, eliminate
several plate making steps, or offer energy and cost savings. [1,17,18]
17. Kull, S.; Timpe, H.-J.; Flugel, M.; Baumann, H., Red-hot and violet. Photopolymer systems at your service.
In: 58th Annual Technical conference of TAGA, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. p. 153-168.
18. Ozcan, A.; Yenidogan, S.; Sesli, Y., The comparison of prints produced by CTP and conventional plate. In:
58th Annual Technical conference of TAGA, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. p. 534-541.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 23
Offset printing
20. Stephens, J., Screen printing in a digital age. Pira. UK. 2000. 84 p.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 25
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 26
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 27
The thread count and the mesh thickness determine the open
screen area.
This area should be large enough to pass though the pigments and
fine enough to provide safe anchoring of the screen onto the
smallest parts of the stencil.
The stencil that is typically made of photopolymer is placed on the
opposite side of the screen than the squeegee to avoid its wear.
The thickness of the ink layer depends on the thickness of the
stencil that ranges from 12 to 100 m. [1,20]
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 28
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 29
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 30
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 31
Comparison
Typical dimensions for good printing results with major printing technologies
3-15 [22]
Screen printing 0.5-50 [22] 0.015 [28], 20-100 [29] >25 [29] 2-3 [29]
30-100 [29]
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 32
References
Kipphan, H., Handbook of print media. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. 1207 p.
Gravure Association of America, Gravure Process and Technology, Rochester NY, 2003.
Rong, X.; Pekarovic, J.; Pekarovicova, A., Gravure printability from laser and electromechanically engraved
cylinder, In: 11th International Printing and Graphics Arts Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2002. p. 151-154.
Sjblom, R.; Nordstrm, J.-E.P.; Erho, T.; Saari, J., Halftone rotogravure ink transfer determinations on LWC
paper. In: 58th Appita Annual Conference, Canberra, Australia, 2004. p. 115-136.
Hennig, G., Direct laser system for rotogravure printing. Gravure 15(2001)4. p. 58-61.
Li, A., The Gravure Atom: An Evaluation of Cell Structure. Gravure 21(2007)3. p. 32-38.
Kunz, W., Ink transfer in gravure process. In: 27th Annual Technical conference of TAGA, 1975. p. 151-176.
Pekarovicova, A.; Pekarovic, J.; Serafano, J., Flexo printability of publication grades: technical challenges of
publication flexography. In: 53rd Annual Technical Conference of TAGA, San Diego, USA, 2001. p. 98-110.
Savastano, D., The flexo ink market. Ink world 83(2005)2. p. 48-52.
Jones, K.; Kent, P.; Bingham, J.; Burgess, D., Anilox roll screen and volume: history, trends and proper selection.
Flexo 32(2007)5. p. 18-23.
Roffers, R. J., What you werent told about your anilox sleeve! Flexo 31(2006)10. p. 45-47.
Hahn, L. M., Variables in printability and ink transfer in flexography. Ink Maker 81(2003)4. p. 46-50.
Galton, D., Photopolymer plate characterization. In: 52th Annual Technical Conference of TAGA, Ashville, NC,
USA, 2002. p. 109-127.
Galton, D., Platemaking technologies and trends. Flexo, 32(2007)1. p. 44-48.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 33
References
Cherry, J.; Claypole, T. C.; Gethin, D. T., Measurement of the ink release from the anilox roll. In:
58th Annual Technical Conference of TAGA, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. p. 395-408.
Bould, D.C.; Hamblyn, S.M.; Claypole, T.C.; Bohan, M.F.J., The effect of process characteristics
on image reproduction in flexographic printing. In: 33rd International research conference of
IARIGAI, Leipzig, Germany, 2006.
Kull, S.; Timpe, H.-J.; Flugel, M.; Baumann, H., Red-hot and violet. Photopolymer systems at your
service. In: 58th Annual Technical conference of TAGA, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. p. 153-
168.
Ozcan, A.; Yenidogan, S.; Sesli, Y., The comparison of prints produced by CTP and conventional
plate. In: 58th Annual Technical conference of TAGA, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2006. p. 534-541.
Savastano, D. 2007. The challenge of emulsification. Ink world 13(2007)8. p. 4.
Stephens, J., Screen printing in a digital age. Pira. UK. 2000. 84 p.
Digital and screen printing association, Common printing processes: Principles of operation and
applications, http://www.spauk.co.uk/VISITORS/Print%20Processes.pdf.
Huebler, A.; Hahn, U.; Beier, W.; Lasch, N.; Fischer, T., High Volume Printing Technologies for the
Production of Polymer Electronic Structures. In: 2nd International IEEE Conference on Polymers
and Adhesives in Microelectronics and Photonics, Zalaegerzeg, Hungary, 2002. p. 172-176
Blayo, A.; Pineaux, B., Printing Processes and their Potential for RFID Printing. In: Proceedings of
the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence, Grenoble, France, 2005. p.
27-30.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 34
References
Kawahara, T.; Doushita, K.; Tada, H., A large area patterned TiO2/SiO2 bilayer type photocatalyst prepared by
gravure printing, Journal of sol-gel science and technology, 27(2003). p.301-307
Maaninen, A.; Tuomikoski, M.; Kivimki, L.; Kololuoma, T.; Vlimki, M.; Leinonen, M.; Knskoski, M., Roll to roll
fabrication technologies for optoelectronic and electronic devices and sensors. In: Proceedings of SPIE, 5956,
Warsaw, Poland, 2005. p.25-34.
Bergsmann, M.; Kastner, F.; Bauer, G.; Domnick, R., Novel security feature made by thin film coating technique.
In: 46th Annual technical conference proceedings of the society of the vacuum coaters, San Francisco, USA,
2003. p. 556-569
Joyo Engineering/Crystec Technology Trading GmbH, Printing Machines for LCD Manufacturing,
http://www.crystec.com/joyprie.htm
Jabbour, G.E.; Radspinner, R.; Peyghambarian, N., Screen Printing for the Fabrication of Organic Light-Emitting
Devices. IEEE Journal on selected topics in quantum electronics, 7(2001)5. p. 769-773.
Sirringhaus, H., Device physics and reliability of solution processed organic TFTs. Flexidis Training Workshop,
Stuttgart, Germany, 2006.
Schrdner, M.; Schultheis, K.; Stohn, R.; Schache H.; Blankenburg, L.; Roth, H., Reel-to-reel laser patterning and
coating for the production of polymer electronic devices. In: Technologies for Polymer Electronics, Frankfurt,
Germany, 2006.
Kim J.Y.; Kim S.H., Lee H.-H; Ma W, Gong X.; Heeger A.J., New Architecture for High-Efficiency Polymer
Photovoltaic Cells Using Solution-Based Titanium Oxide as an Optical Spacer. Advanced Materials 18(2006)5. p.
572-576.
Kim J.Y.; Lee K.; Coates N.E.; Moses D.; Nguyen T.Q.; Dante M.; Heeger A.J., Efficient Tandem Polymer Solar
Cells Fabricated by All-Solution Processing. Science 317(2007)5838. p.222-225.
Lee K.; Kim J.Y.; Park S.H.; Kim S.H.; Cho S.; Heeger A.J., Air-Stable Polymer Electronic Devices. Advanced
Materials 19(2007)18. p. 2446-2449.
VTT 2011
17/11/2011 35