Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 02
03 01.4
Procedures and Guidelines Page 1 of 9
Performance, Propulsion
1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Effective Date Revision
2008 01
Method
Table of Contents
Edited by Approved
VM is model speed.
RC =
(1 + k ).CFMC + CR R method, mainly uncertainties of the tests and
the prediction method itself and the assump-
(1 + k ).CFM + CR TM tions made for the prediction method. The
separation of CF from CA was proposed by
where CFMC is the frictional resistance coeffi- the Performance Prediction Committee of the
cient at the temperature of the self-propulsion 19th ITTC. This is essential to allow for the
test. effects of newly developed hull coating sys-
tems.
2.4 Full Scale Predictions
The 19th ITTC also proposed a modified
2.4.1 Total Resistance of Ship formula for CA that excludes roughness al-
lowance, which is now given in this proce-
The total resistance coefficient of a ship dure.
without bilge keels is
- CF is the roughness allowance
CTS = (1 + k )CFS + CF + CA + CR + CAAS k 3
1
1
C F = 0.044 S 10 Re 3 + 0.000125
LWL
where
where kS indicates the roughness of
-k is the form factor determined from the hull surface. When there is no meas-
resistance test, see ITTC standard pro- ured data, the standard value of
cedure 7.5-02-02-01. kS=15010-6 m can be used.
CR = CTM (1 + k )CFM
ITTC Recommended 7.5 02
03 01.4
Procedures and Guidelines Page 5 of 9
Performance, Propulsion
1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Effective Date Revision
2008 01
Method
The difference in drag coefficient CD is The wake scale effect of twin screw ships
with open sterns is usually small, and for such
CD = CDM CDS ships it is common to assume wTS = wTM.
2.4.3 Full Scale Wake and Operating Condi- - the delivered power of each propeller:
tion of Propeller K
PDS = 2 S DS5nS3 QTS 10 3 (kW)
The full-scale wake is calculated by the fol- R
lowing formula using the model wake fraction
wTM, and the thrust deduction fraction t obtained - the thrust of each propeller:
as the analysed results of self-propulsion test: K
TS = T2 J T2S S DS4nS2 (N)
J
(1 + k )CFS + CF
wTS = (t + wR ) + ( wTM t wR )
(1 + k )CFM - the torque of each propeller:
K QTS
where wR stands for the effect of rudder on the QS = S DS5 nS2 (Nm)
wake fraction. If there is no estimate for wR, the R
standard value of 0.04 can be used.
- the effective power:
If the estimated wTS is greater than wTM, wTS 1
should be set as wTM. PE = CTS SVS3 SS 10 3 (kW)
2
ITTC Recommended 7.5 02
03 01.4
Procedures and Guidelines Page 8 of 9
Performance, Propulsion
1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Effective Date Revision
2008 01
Method
tests on stator fins and/or rudders are to be done 3.2 Comparison with Full Scale Results
correctly.
The data that led to 1978 ITTC perform-
In this case, the shaft rate of revolutions is ance prediction method can be found in the
predicted on the basis of power identity as fol- following ITTC proceedings:
lows:
(1) Proposed Performance Prediction Factors
KQ 1000 CP PDS for Single Screw Ocean Going Ships
3 =
J T 2 S DSVS (1 wTS )
2 3 3
(13th 1972 pp.155-180) Empirical Power
Prediction Factor ( 1+X )
KQ 0 K
3
= Q3 RM (2) Propeller Dynamics Comparative Tests
J J T
(13th 1972 pp.445-446 )
(1 wTS ) VS
nS = (3) Comparative Calculations with the ITTC
J TS DS
Trial Prediction Test Programme
nT = CNP nS (14th 1975 Vol.3 pp.548-553)
4. REFERENCES
3. VALIDATION
(1) Hoerner, S.F. (1965) Fluid-Dynamic
3.1 Uncertainty Analysis Drag. Published by the author.
Not yet available (2) Kirkman, K.L., Kletsli, J.W. (1980)
Scaling Problems of model appendages,
19th American Towing Tank Conference,
Ann Arbor, Michigan