POKFMP OJFM POJEF POWEJF POWEJF PQWOEJ

QOFM QPOWEJF QPMOWEIJF QPOWEIJF

QPOWEF JMQPWEIJF QWPEOIJF QPWE
today. Guys would no longer be so eager to do them special favors, and men would
be MUCH more wary about getting married. Guys would no longer be such easy targ
ets for the deceptive games so many women play for materialistic gains. Women ar
e SCARED of that truth getting out!!
The majority of men have been married and have had girlfriends, but many of THOS
E men are blissfully unaware of how fake their mate's "love" is . Women find the
majority of men unattractive, yet settle for those same guys for practical, soc
ial and cultural reasons. Paradoxically, the majority of THOSE guys have NEVER e
xperienced what REAL love from a woman is like! Her practical needs simply outwe
igh her need for love, and she is under social pressure to maintain a fascade of
love for her man. If only those men knew this...
Think about it. What do you think would happen to the dating/marriage game if mo
st men realized just HOW much looks affected their true market value? What do yo
u think would happen if those "normalfags" woke up to the fact that women can ON
LY have romantic emotions toward a man who is conventionally physically attracti
ve? If men want to regain the value in society they have lost, they MUST wake up
to the redpill truth about male looks and the games women play.
Women would not be able to get away with the blatant disrespect that is so commo
nplace nowadays. Male knowledge of the true nature of female sexuality would mak
e a woman's erotic capital less effective in gaining special favors and perks fr
om men. Her erotic costs for those special favors would be much higher. They wou
ld also have to bring their standards in line with their actual market value and
not be so demanding in their mate search. Men as a group would NO LONGER TOLERA
TE the pricey behavior women get away with so easily today. We would probably se
e a return to a much more traditional approach to courtship and marriage. The se
xual market would be far more balanced between the sexes, like it used to be. Wo
men very well might return to traditional ways... WILLINGLY...as they are faced
with the EVEN WORSE end result of unrestricted and uncontrolled female sexuality
, without a male counterbalance in place in the sexual market.
blandooasdokasonga
asdmgapsdikgnapsd
asmdgask
The majority of men have been married and have had girlfriends, but many of THOS
E men are blissfully unaware of how fake their mate's "love" is . Women find the
majority of men unattractive, yet settle for those same guys for practical, soc
ial and cultural reasons. Paradoxically, the majority of THOSE guys have NEVER e
xperienced what REAL love from a woman is like! Her practical needs simply outwe
igh her need for love, and she is under social pressure to maintain a fascade of
love for her man. If only those men knew this...
Think about it. What do you think would happen to the dating/marriage game if mo
st men realized just HOW much looks affected their true market value? What do yo
u think would happen if those "normalfags" woke up to the fact that women can ON
LY have romantic emotions toward a man who is conventionally physically attracti
ve? If men want to regain the value in society they have lost, they MUST wake up
to the redpill truth about male looks and the games women play.
Women would not be able to get away with the blatant disrespect that is so commo
nplace nowadays. Male knowledge of the true nature of female sexuality would mak
e a woman's erotic capital less effective in gaining special favors and perks fr
om men. Her erotic costs for those special favors would be much higher. They wou
ld also have to bring their standards in line with their actual market value and
not be so demanding in their mate search. Men as a group would NO LONGER TOLERA
TE the pricey behavior women get away with so easily today. We would probably se
e a return to a much more traditional approach to courtship and marriage. The se
xual market would be far more balanced between the sexes, like it used to be. Wo
men very well might return to traditional ways... WILLINGLY...as they are faced
with the EVEN WORSE end result of unrestricted and uncontrolled female sexuality
, without a male counterbalance in place in the sexual market.
The 60s sexual revolution had a major flaw. It allowed women to get fucked by gu
ys WAY out of their league, but the sexual revolution did not account for the in
tense internal conflict many women feel between marriage and sexual attraction.
Today, the Sisterhood is in the position of trying to explain away damning proof
of the true nature of female sexuality. Actions speak louder than words. What m
en see does not match the words, and not every man is so gullible. Female sexual
privaledge is only possible when men remain decieved and unaware of how female
sexuality operates.
THAT is why women lie about looks! They KNOW what would happen to their privaled
ged position in the sexual market. Don't kid yourselves, guys. THEY KNOW EXACTLY
WHAT THEY'RE DOING! If a women is sexually attracted to you, she reveals a part
of herself that is a CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET`she keeps from the average-looking
guys she dates.
Cheating is commonplace because women typically settle in the looks department f
or relationships and marriage. They cannot truly _LOVE_ a man who does not spark
her SEXUAL desire IMMEDIATELY - on LOOKS ALONE! The guy usually cheats because
she isn't putting out, and the woman usually cheats because she was never truly
sexually attracted to her man in the first place. A man generally does not requi
re a "7" to get sexually aroused, but a women DOES. She has to deal with the int
ernal conflict between the desire for companionship and family, versus her sexua
l needs. I belive guys would be even worse than women as cheaters if they were i
n the typical female position. As much as women cheat, the amount of restraint t
hey exhibit before finally succumbing to the temptation is admirable. Too many m
en do not know how truly easy it is for a woman to cheat if she really wants to.
They do it simply because they can, where doing the same takes a lot more effor
t to accomplish for a man. That's why most female cheating is typically more spo
ntanteous, while a man's cheating is typically more planned and methodical.
Honestly, while a return to traditional ways might be largely beneficial for men
, it has its problems. There's gotta be a better way to solve these problems, wi
thout women having to settle for a guy they aren't physically attracted to, and
taking away the freedoms of another human being. More guys would have mates in a
more traditional sexual market, but a pragmatic approach to marriage absolutely
CANNOT be sustainable without one gender submitting to the other's total CONTRO
L, and SERIOUS restraints on divorce. The true nature of female sexuality is THE
MAIN FUNDAMENTAL RESAON why women were classically put under such tight constra
ints. THAT is why feminism and female sexuality is often so tightly interlinked.
Notice how much they talk about SEX and SEXUALITY in their writings? That is NO
T a coincidence!
I say fuck all this slavery and settling shit. This is the 21st century. Mass ma
le looksmaxxing, legalization of anabolic steroids under a physician's care, and
publicly available, IMPROVED cosmetic surgery for the aesthetically disabled ma
les, would be the more civilized, progressive, and EASIER-to-accomplish solution
. You can call this idea crazy, but as gender problems get progressively worse i
n the future - and they WILL -, a dramatic solution WILL eventually be necessary
. Putting men on gear and under the knife would be far more efficient, peaceful,
moral and beneficial, than regulating women to second-class status and glorifie
d prostitution. That's the shit that caused feminism in the first place. In a wo
rld of erotic equality, men wouldn't need MGTOW and MRA's, and women wouldn't fe
el the need for feminism.
today. Guys would no longer be so eager to do them special favors, and men would
 be MUCH more wary about getting married. Guys would no longer be such easy targ
ets for the deceptive games so many women play for materialistic gains. Women ar
e SCARED of that truth getting out!!
The majority of men have been married and have had commonplace nowadays. Male kn
owledge of the true nature of female sexuality would make a woman's erotic capit
al less effective in gaining special favors and perks from men. Her erotic costs
for those special favors would be much higher. They would also have to bring th
eir standards in line with their actual market value and not be so demanding in
their mate search. Men as a group would NO LONGER TOLERATE the pricey behavior w
omen get away with so easily today. We would probably see a return to a much mor
e traditional approach to courtship and marriage. The sexual market would be far
more balanced between the sexes, like it used to be. Women very well might retu
rn to traditional ways... WILLINGLY...as they are faced with the EVEN WORSE end
result of unrestricted and uncontrolled female sexuality, without a male counter
balance in place in the sexual market.
The 60s sexual revolution had a major flaw. It allowed women to get fucked by gu
ys WAY out of their league, but the sexual revolution did not account for the in
tense internal conflict many women feel between marriage and sexual attraction.
Today, the Sisterhood is in the position of trying to explain away damning proof
of the true nature of female sexuality. Actions speak louder than words. What m
en see does not match the words, and not every man is so gullible. Female sexual
privaledge is only possible when men remain decieved and unaware of how female
sexuality operates.
THAT is why women lie about looks! They KNOW what would happen to their privaled
ged position in the sexual market. Don't kid yourselves, guys. THEY KNOW EXACTLY
WHAT THEY'RE DOING! If a women is sexually attracted to you, she reveals a part
of herself that is a CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET`she keeps from the average-looking
guys she dates.
Cheating is commonplace because women typically settle in the looks department f
or relationships and marriage. They cannot truly _LOVE_ a man who does not spark
her SEXUAL desire IMMEDIATELY - on LOOKS ALONE! The guy usually cheats because
she isn't putting out, and the woman usually cheats because she was never truly
sexually attracted to her man in the first place. A man generally does not requi
re a "7" to get sexually aroused, but a women DOES. She has to deal with the int
ernal conflict between the desire for companionship and family, versus her sexua
l needs. I belive guys would be even worse than women as cheaters if they were i
n the typical female position. As much as women cheat, the amount of restraint t
hey exhibit before finally succumbing to the temptation is admirable. Too many m
en do not know how truly easy it is for a woman to cheat if she really wants to.
They do it simply because they can, where doing the same takes a lot more effor
t to accomplish for a man. That's why most female cheating is tygaozngas

boobs
pically more spontanteous, while a man's cheating is typically more planned and
methodical.
Honestly, while a return to traditional ways might be largely beneficial for men
, it has its problems. There's gotta be a better way to solve these problems, wi
thout women having to settle for a guy they aren't physically attracted to, and
taking away the freedoms of another human being. More guys would have mates in a
more traditional sexual market, but a pragmatic approach to marriage absolutely
CANNOT be sustainable without one gender submitting to the other's total CONTRO
L, and SERIOUS restraints on divorce. The true nature of female sexuality is THE
MAIN FUNDAMENTAL RESAON why women were classically put under such tight constra
ints. THAT is why feminism and female sexuality is often so tightly interlinked.
Notice how much they talk about SEX and SEXUALITY in their writings? That is NO
T a coincidence!
I say fuck all this slavery and settling shit. This is the 21st century. Mass ma
le looksmaxxing, legalization of anabolic steroids under a physician's care, and
publicly available, IMPROVED cosmetic surgery for the aesthetically disabled ma
les, would be the more civilized, progressive, and EASIER-to-accomplish solution
. You can call this idea crazy, but as gender problems get progressively worse i
n the future - and they WILL -, a dramatic solution WILL eventually be necessary
. Putting men on gear and under the knife would be far more efficient, peaceful,
moral and beneficial, than regulating women to second-class status and glorifie
d prostitution. That's the shit that caused feminism in the first place. In a wo
rld of erotic equality, men wouldn't need MGTOW and MRA's, and women wouldn't fe
el the need for feminism.
shitttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt