Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Copyright 1992 by the American Psychological Association, Inc.

1992, Vol. 60, No. 6, 845-856 0022-006X/92/$3.00

Comorbidity of Schizophrenia and Substance Abuse:

Implications for Treatment
Kim T. Mueser, Alan S. Bellack, and Jack J. Blanchard
Department of Psychiatry
Medical College of Pennsylvania
Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

The problem of substance abuse disorders in schizophrenia patients is reviewed, including the
prevalence of comorbid disorders, assessment, hypothesized mechanisms underlying abuse, and
the clinical effects of abuse on the course of illness and cognitive functioning. The principles of
treatment for dual-diagnosis schizophrenia patients are outlined, and the limitations of existing
interventions are noted. Gaps in current knowledge about the impact of substance abuse on schizo-
phrenia and its treatment are identified, and suggestions are made regarding promising avenues of
research in this area.

Alcohol and drug abuse-dependence have long been recog-
nized to interfere with the diagnosis and treatment of major
psychiatric disorders (e.g., Parker, Meiller, & Andrews, 1960).
As the prevalence of substance abuse has grown in the general
population following the cultural revolution of the 1960s, so has
the problem of treating patients with comorbid psychiatric ill-
ness and substance abuse (Kushner & Mueser, in press). This
problem is particularly acute for patients with severe, chronic
psychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia, who appear to be
at increased vulnerability to abuse drugs or alcohol (Ananth et
al., 1989). Substance abuse in schizophrenia has been asso-
ciated with a more severe course of the disorder, including an
earlier age of illness onset (Mueser et al., 1990), more severe
symptomatology, and an increased rate of psychiatric hospital-
ization (Cleghorn et al, 1991; Drake et al., 1990). In light of the
wide range of cognitive, affective, and social impairments char-
acteristic of schizophrenia (Morrison, Bellack, & Mueser, 1988;
Nuechterlein & Dawson, 1984b), the treatment of patients with
comorbid substance abuse disorders presents a formidable
challenge to both clinicians and the mental health system as a
whole. There is a pressing need for more effective psychothera-
peutic interventions to improve the outcome of schizophrenia
patients who abuse drugs or alcohol. In the absence of such
treatments, these patients are doomed to a poor quality of life,
housing instability, and repeated relapses and rehospitaliza-
tions, with society paying the high economic costs of managing
this erratic illness in the community.
This article focuses on the problems of substance abuse in
schizophrenia and its treatments to help therapists optimize the
outcome of this dual-diagnosis population. We organized our
Preparation of this article was supported by National Institute of
Mental Health Grants MH38636, MH39998, and MH41577.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kim
T. Mueser, Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Pennsyl-
vania, Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, 3200 Henry Avenue,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19129.
845
review to first describe research on the prevalence, assessment,
and impact of substance abuse on the course of schizophrenia.
Second, we review studies on the effects of substance abuse on
cognitive factors in schizophrenia and consider the implica-
tions of these effects for treatment. Third, we summarize the
principles of treating substance abusing schizophrenia patients,
we review the limited treatment outcome research in this area,
and we identify avenues for future research that may improve
the efficacy of existing treatment technologies.
Epidemiology of Substance Abuse in Schizophrenia
Estimates of the prevalence of substance abuse disorders in
schizophrenia have ranged from as low as 10% to over 65%
during the life of the patient (Ananth et al, 1989; Bowers &
Swigar, 1983; Mueser et al, 1990). This wide range of preva-
lence estimates can be accounted for by methodological differ-
ences across studies, including the procedures used to sample
the study populations, assessment techniques, and the demo-
graphic characteristics of the subjects.
The setting from which the sample of schizophrenia patients
is drawn has an important influence on the observed rates of
substance abuse prevalence, with acute care settings (e.g., emer-
gency room) yielding higher rates than chronic inpatient envi-
ronments (Galanter, Castaneda, & Ferman, 1988). Different
approaches to defining and assessing substance abuse also re-
sult in varying estimates of prevalence; the use of structured
interviews to establish substance abuse-dependence diagnoses
is more reliable than self-report scales or chart review (Drake et
al, 1990). Patient demographic characteristics are also impor-
tant correlates of substance abuse, and differences in these
characteristics across study samples have a corresponding ef-
fect on estimated prevalence rates. For example, gender (i.e,
male) and age (i.e, youth) are both predictive of substance abuse
disorders, so that samples with a preponderance of young
males, as is the case with many studies of young chronic pa-
tients (e.g. Pepper, Kirshner, & Ryglewicz, 1981; Safer, 1987),
tend to yield high estimates of the prevalence of substance
846 K. MUESER, A. BELLACK, AND J. BLANCHARD
abuse. Demographic and clinical predictors of substance abuse
in schizophrenia are summarized in Table 1.
The vast majority of studies have examined the prevalence of
substance abuse in schizophrenia patients receiving treatment
for their psychiatric disorder. A methodological limitation of
this approach is that epidemiological surveys based on clinical
populations tend to overestimate rates of comorbidity in com-
parison to community-based surveys, because there is a ten-
dency for each type of disorder to independently lead to seek-
ing medical care (i.e., "Berkson's fallacy"; Berkson, 1946). Thus,
surveying patients in the general population is the optimal
method for estimating the prevalence of substance abuse Co-
morbidity in schizophrenia. Only one large-scale community-
based comorbidity study has been conducted, the National In-
stitute of Mental Health (NIMH) Epidemiologic Catchment
Area (ECA) program (Regier et al., 1990), which evaluated sub-
stance abuse and other psychiatric disorders using structured
clinical interviews with over 20,000 individuals. Although the
major focus of this study was on the assessment of substance
abuse and psychiatric disorders among people living in the com-
munity, institutionalized samples of psychiatric patients were
also included to obtain an adequate sample size of severe psychi-
atric disorders.
The results of the ECA study provide strong evidence that
psychiatric patients in general, and especially schizophrenia
patients, are much more prone to substance abuse disorders
than people in the general population. Table 2 summarizes the
estimated prevalence rates from the ECA study for alcohol
abuse and drug abuse in the general population and in three
diagnostic groups (schizophrenia, affective disorder, and anxi-
ety disorder). For example, it can be seen from Table 2 that
16.7% of the general population had a history of substance
abuse disorder, compared with 47.0% of the schizophrenia pa-
tients, 32.0% of the affective disorder patients, and 23.7% of
people with an anxiety disorder. The odds ratios (ORs) included
in Table 2 reflect the odds of having a substance abuse disorder
in a psychiatric diagnostic group (e.g., schizophrenia) to the
odds of substance abuse in people not in the diagnostic group
(e.g., nonschizophrenics). Thus, in the ECA study the chances of
a person with schizophrenia having a substance abuse or de-
pendence disorder were more than four times greater than a
person who does not have schizophrenia (i.e., OR = 4.6).
It is apparent from the ECA study, as well as many other less
rigorous epidemiological studies (e.g., Ananth et al., 1989; Bar-
Table 1
Demographic and Clinical Predictors
of Substance Abuse in Schizophrenia
Correlate with
Variable substance abuse
Gender Male
Age Young
Education Low
Premorbid social-sexual adjustment Good
Age of first hospitalization Early
Treatment compliance Poor
Relapse rate High
Symptom severity Higher suicidality
Table 2
Lifetime Prevalence (%) and Odds Ratios (ORs) of Substance
Abuse Disorder for Schizophrenia, Affective
Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder
Any
substance Any other
abuse or Any alcohol drug
dependence diagnosis diagnosis
Psychiatric
disorder % OR % OR % OR
General population 16.7 13.5 6.1
Schizophrenia 47.0 4.6 33.7 3.3 27.5 6.2
Affective 32.0 2.6 21.8 1.9 19.4 4.7
Anxiety 23.7 1.7 17.9 1.5 11.9 2.5
Note. Dashes indicate data not available. Odds ratios = ratio of the
odds of having the substance abuse disorder in the psychiatric diag-
nostic group to the odds of the disorder in the remaining population.
Based on data from the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemio-
logical Catchment Area study (Regier et al., 1990).
bee, Clark, Crapanzano, Heintz, & Kehoe, 1989; Bernadt &
Murray, 1986; Magliozzi, Kanter, Csernansky, & Hollister,
1983; Mueser et al., 1990; Siris et al., 1988), that substance abuse
in schizophrenia patients is a common clinical problem. Al-
though the lifetime prevalence rate of substance abuse in schizo-
phrenia is close to 50%, estimates of recent or current substance
abuse are generally in the range of 20% to 40% (e.g., Drake,
Osher, & Wallach, 1989; Mueser et al., 1990). Alcohol is consis-
tently the substance most commonly abused by schizophrenia
patients, although there is a high correlation between alcohol
abuse and drug abuse, particularly marijuana and stimulants
(Barbee et al., 1989; Mueser et al., 1990).
It should be noted that the vast preponderance of data on
comorbid substance abuse in schizophrenia has been on North
Americans (mainly from the United States), and that these esti-
mates may not apply to schizophrenia patients in other parts of
the world. It is widely understood that rates and types of sub-
stance abuse differ markedly throughout the world (Austin,
Macari, & Lettieri, 1978) and that culture is an important deter-
minant of the propensity to develop an addictive disorder to a
particular type of substance (Westermeyer, 1986). However, rel-
atively little data are available from non-North American sam-
ples of schizophrenia patients. Selected studies from England
(Bernadt & Murray, 1986), Spain (Peralta & Cuesta, 1992), and
Croatia (Koretic & Hotujac, 1987) suggest a lower rate of sub-
stance abuse in schizophrenia than in North American sam-
ples. It is unknown whether the apparently lower rates of co-
morbid substance abuse in non-American samples reflect a
truly lower rate of comorbidity or whether it is due to some type
of measurement artifact, such as method of assessment or selec-
tion of patients. These findings raise intriguing questions in
need of research as to whether cross-cultural and cross-national
differences in the course and outcome of schizophrenia may be
due, in part, to differences in comorbid substance abuse.
Assessment
The accurate assessment of comorbid disorders is essential to
planning effective treatments, but it is rendered difficult by the
 SPECIAL SECTION: SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
broad impact of schizophrenia on interpersonal functioning,
and the psychotomimetic effects of substance abuse. To make
the diagnosis of schizophrenia, it must first be established that
the patient has experienced a clear deterioration in social,
work, or self-care functioning in the absence of substance
abuse, as well as having at least some of the following symp-
toms: delusions, prominent hallucinations, incoherence or
looseness of associations, catatonic behavior, or flat or inappro-
priate affect (American Psychiatric Association, 1987). Clini-
cians who attempt to diagnose schizophrenia without assessing
either history of substance abuse or the possibility of covert
drug or alcohol abuse run a grave risk of misdiagnosis and,
consequently, mistreatment (Alterman, Erdlen, LaPorte, &
Erdlen, 1982; R. C. W Hall, Popkin, & DeVaul, 1977).
Alcohol and commonly abused "street" drugs can produce a
range of transient psychotic symptoms similar to those found in
schizophrenia. Chronic alcohol abuse or withdrawal from alco-
hol can cause hallucinations and delusions (Schuckit, 1989;
Victor & Hope, 1958). Amphetamine abuse has been found to
produce a temporary psychotic state that is clinically indistin-
guishable from schizophrenia (R. C. W Hall, Popkin, Beres-
ford, & Hall, 1988), and chronic cocaine abuse or overdoses of
cocaine can cause paranoia and delirium (Welti & Fishbain,
1985). Similarly, cannabis abuse can induce panic and paranoid
symptoms (Hollister, 1986). Finally, hallucinogens, such as
LSD, phencyclidine (PCP), and psilocybin, cause a variety of
psychotic symptoms (e.g., Hensala, Epstein, & Blacker, 1967)
and have served as useful animal models for schizophrenia (Ja-
vitt, 1987). In short, acute or chronic substance abuse or with-
drawal from psychoactive drugs can cause many of the same
symptoms found in schizophrenia. It is imperative, therefore,
when making a diagnosis of schizophrenia to rule out the acute
effects of substance abuse or withdrawal symptoms by question-
ing the patient and significant others about psychoactive sub-
stance use. If substance abuse has occurred in the past, but
there is evidence of schizophrenic symptomatology in the ab-
sence of recent abuse (e.g., within the past month), a diagnosis
of schizophrenia can be reliably made.
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (3rd ed., rev; DSM-IH-R; American Psychiatric Asso-
ciation, 1987), the diagnosis of substance dependence requires
at least three of the following symptoms to have been present
for 1 month or to have occurred repeatedly for a longer period:
substance taken in larger amounts or for longer periods than
intended; increased tolerance; withdrawal symptoms; use of
substance to relieve withdrawal symptoms; excessive amounts
of time spent obtaining, using, or recovering from the effects of
the substance; persistent desire or unsuccessful attempts to stop
or cut down substance use; continued use of substance despite
knowledge of the deleterious social, psychological, or physical
effects; giving up or decreasing important activities (e.g., work
or hobbies) because of substance use; and frequent intoxication
or withdrawal effects experienced during fulfillment of signifi-
cant obligations (e.g., intoxicated at work, at school, or when
caring for children). The diagnosis of substance abuse is in-
voked to characterize maladaptive patterns of substance use
that do not meet criteria for dependence and requires recurrent
substance use in situations where use is physically hazardous
(e.g., driving a car or operating machinery while intoxicated) or
847
continued substance use despite knowledge that such use
has negative effects on social, occupational, or physical func-
tioning.
Once the diagnosis of schizophrenia is established, several
factors can interfere with the assessment of a comorbid sub-
stance abuse disorder. Perhaps the most significant problem is
the reliability of patients' self-reports about their own sub-
stance abuse. The validity of self-reports of primary substance
abusers is often questionable, both for concurrent abuse (Don-
ovan & Marlatt, 1988) and retrospective ratings (Aiken, 1986).
These problems are compounded when the patient has another
major psychiatric disorder (Lehman, Myers, & Corty, 1989).
Schizophrenia patients often deny substance abuse for fear of
losing basic psychiatric treatment services and entitlements
(Ridgely, Goldman, & Willenbring, 1990). Furthermore, once
patients are identified as substance abusers they tend to receive
less outpatient treatment, suggesting that these patients are
viewed as difficult by mental health-care workers (Solomon,
1986; Solomon & Davis, 1986).
Another difficulty encountered when assessing substance
abuse in schizophrenia patients is the problem of determining
the negative effects of abuse on patient functioning. Schizophre-
nia patients usually have a range of impairments in their social,
occupational, and psychological functioning, and evaluating
the deleterious effects of substance abuse on a baseline of poor
functioning raises questions about the validity of these indices
of functioning. Drake et al. (1989) have reported that the effects
of alcohol on schizophrenia patients frequently involve a
change in the patient's clinical condition, compliance with
treatment, or housing stability, but that many patients do not
develop the full alcohol dependence syndrome (see also Bunt,
Galanter, Lifshutz, & Castaneda, 1990; Chen et al., 1992).
The most commonly used methods for assessing substance
abuse disorders in schizophrenia are hospital records, struc-
tured clinical interviews, self-report scales, reports from signifi-
cant others or treatment staff, and biological assays. There are
both advantages and disadvantages to each of these methods, as
outlined in Table 3. Structured clinical interviews probably
provide the most reliable information because of the standard-
ized, rigorous approach to collecting information, although
these interviews are time-consuming and require extensive
training to administer properly. Pristach and Smith (1990) sug-
gested that some schizophrenia patients are willing to acknowl-
edge substance abuse on self-report questionnaires but deny
substance abuse in interviews. Although most self-report scales
developed for primary addiction populations have not been
validated for psychiatric patients (Toland & Moss, 1989), there
is mixed evidence suggesting that the Michigan Alcoholism
Screening Inventory can be useful for detecting alcoholism in
schizophrenia patients (Drake et al., 1990; Gorelick, Irwin,
Schmidt-Lackner, & Marder, 1990).
Whereas each approach to assessment has its limitations, in
practice many patients freely admit to recent or past substance
abuse when questioned. There is a greater tendency for patients
to acknowledge alcohol abuse than drug abuse. We advise inter-
viewers to assure patients in advance that information about
their substance abuse is needed strictly for diagnostic and treat-
ment purposes, and there will be no legal or financial repercus-
sions for full disclosure. The optimal method for assessing sub-
848 K. MUESER, A. BELLACK, AND J. BLANCHARD

Table 3
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Methods for the Assessment of Substance Abuse in Schizophrenia
Method Examples Advantages Disadvantages
Chart review Utilizes collateral sources of Low sensitivity results in
information. underestimates of substance
abuse.
Structured clinical SCID Highly reliable due to standardized Time consuming. Patient may deny
interviews method of obtaining abuse in personal interview.
information.
Self-report questionnaires MAST Time efficient. Patients may Unknown validity for psychiatric
acknowledge abuse on patients.
questionnaires when they don't
in interviews.
Significant others reports Family History Research Provides independent information Subject to relatives' attributions
Diagnostic Criteria about patients' behavior in about patients' illness and
natural environment. substance abuse.
Treatment provider Case manager ratings Incorporates clinical information Lack of standardized assessment
ratings using multiple source. questions may limit reliability
of ratings.
Biological assays Urine toxicology analysis Highly reliable results about Impractical in most clinical
current substance use. settings. Provides no information
on extent or consequences of
abuse. Detects only very recent
substance abuse.

Note. SCID = Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.; rev.) (Spitzer, Williams,
Gibbon, & First, 1990). MAST = Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (Selzer, 1971). Family history research diagnostic criteria are from
Andreasen, Endicott, Spitzer, and Winokur (1977) and Andreasen, Rice, Endicott, Reich, and Coryell (1986). Case manager ratings are from Drake
etal. (1990).

stance abuse is to tap multiple sources of information, includ-
ing clinical records, patients, treatment team members, and
relatives (when available). Clinicians are often privy to changes
in mental status or other aspects of functioning induced by even
low levels of substance abuse. Drake et al. (1990) showed that
case managers are excellent resources who can provide reliable,
valid ratings of substance abuse.
Reasons for Substance Abuse in Schizophrenia
The most prominent hypothesis to account for the high rate
of substance abuse in psychiatric disorders is self-medication
(Khantzian, 1985). According to this hypothesis, patients abuse
alcohol and drugs to decrease distress caused by major symp-
toms, particularly anxiety and depression. It has been sug-
gested that schizophrenia patients prefer to abuse stimulants
(e.g., amphetamines or cocaine) to overcome the negative symp-
toms of schizophrenia (Schneier & Siris, 1987), but this finding
has not been replicated in recent studies (Mueser, Yarnold, &
Bellack, 1992), including the large ECA study (Regier et al,
1990). At this time, the preponderance of evidence indicates
that the drug choice of schizophrenia patients is determined by
availability, rather than the specific central nervous system ef-
fects of the drugs. Alcohol is consistently the most commonly
abused substance of schizophrenia patients, as well as of the
general population. After alcohol, drug choice for schizophre-
nia patients varies over time and as a function of the demo-
graphic characteristics of the sample. For example, Mueser et
al. (1992) reported that in 1983-1986 cannabis was the most
commonly abused illicit drug among schizophrenia patients,
whereas in 1986-1990 cocaine became the most popular drug
among schizophrenia patients, a change in pattern similar to
that in the general population (Pope, lonescu-Pioggia, Aizley,
&Varma, 1990).
Schizophrenia patients give a number of reasons for abusing
drugs, some of which are consistent with the self-medication
hypothesis. Many patients report that alcohol temporarily re-
lieves chronic psychotic symptoms, such as delusions of refer-
ence and hallucinations (Freed, 1975; Hansell & Willis, 1977).
Most patients describe the use of drugs or alcohol to "get high,"
relax, or alleviate boredom, and patients frequently report that
drug use stimulates and energizes them (Dixon, Haas, Weiden,
Sweeney, & Frances, 1991; Test, Wallisch, Allness, & Ripp,
1989). From the patient's perspective, self-medication is an at-
tractive explanation for substance abuse behavior, and one that
is frequently used by a wide variety of people who abuse drugs
or alcohol (e.g., Kushner, Sher, & Beitman, 1990). Despite pa-
tients' reports, there is little evidence supporting self-medica-
tion as an explanation for why schizophrenia patients are more
vulnerable to substance abuse. If more symptomatic patients
were more likely to abuse drugs or alcohol, this would support
the self-medication hypothesis. However, studies of symptom-
atology in substance abusing schizophrenia patients have pro-
duced contradictory findings (e.g., Barbee et al, 1989; Cleghorn
et al, 1991; Dixon et al, 1991; Mueser et al., 1990; Negrete,
Knapp, Douglas, & Smith, 1986; Sevy, Kay, Opler, & van Praag,
 SPECIAL SECTION: SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
1990). Thus, the self-medication hypothesis appears to be of
limited value in explaining the high rate of substance abuse in
schizophrenia patients.
The situational context in which schizophrenia patients
abuse drugs and alcohol provides important clues about the
environmental determinants of substance abuse. The abuse of
illicit drugs (e.g., marijuana and cocaine) in schizophrenia pa-
tients usually occurs in a social setting, and similarly, about half
of alcohol abuse also occurs in a social context (Dixon, Haas,
Weiden, Sweeney, & Frances, 1990). The social nature of sub-
stance abuse in schizophrenia suggests that such behavior may
meet patients' social-affiliative needs for acceptance and inter-
personal contact. Examining the social context in which each
patient abuses drugs is vital to designing effective treatment.
Interventions may be required to bolster the ability of patients
to resist peer pressure to abuse drugs or alcohol or to alter the
composition of patients' social networks, thus reducing their
exposure to substance abusing peers.
Etiologically, substance abuse in schizophrenia patients ap-
pears to be determined by both the availability of drugs and
alcohol in the patient's peer group and, to a lesser extent, ge-
netic factors as well. Family studies have found that schizophre-
nia patients with a history of substance abuse-dependence do
not differ from nonabusing patients in the number of relatives
with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, but that the abusing
patients have more relatives with histories of substance abuse
and affective disorders (Dixon et al., 1991; Gershon et al., 1988).
Thus, environmental and biological factors appear to contrib-
ute to the high rate of substance abuse in schizophrenia,
whereas patients describe euphoric or other relaxing effects of
drugs as reasons for abusing drugs.
Clinical Effects of Substance Abuse
Relatively little longitudinal research has been conducted to
examine the effects of substance abuse on the course of schizo-
phrenia. Most studies have been retrospective and raise ques-
tions about whether observed correlations reflect the conse-
quences of substance abuse or patient selection factors. Never-
theless, there are some notable trends in the data. There is
compelling evidence that stimulant abuse (e.g., cocaine and am-
phetamines) can precipitate onset of schizophrenia at an earlier
age in biologically vulnerable people (Breakey, Goodell, Lor-
enz, & McHugh, 1974; Richard, Liskow, & Perry, 1985; Tsuang,
Simpson, & Kronfol, 1982). The mechanism underlying this
effect is unclear, but it has been suggested that repeated stimu-
lant abuse may alter the dopamine system (which is believed to
be involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia), resulting in
behavioral sensitization and the development of schizophrenic
symptoms (Lieberman, Kinon, & Loebel, 1990). Stimulant
abuse, even in relatively small quantities, can also precipitate
symptom relapses and hospitalizations (e.g., Lieberman et al.,
1989).
Alcohol abuse has not been linked to an earlier onset of
schizophrenia (e.g., Barbee et al., 1989), although it has been
associated with a higher vulnerability to relapses in prospective
research (Drake et al., 1990). Soni and Brownlee (1991) re-
ported that schizophrenia patients who were alcohol abusers
had lower serum fluphenazine (a neuroleptic medication) levels
849
and more hospitalizations, which suggests that these patients
were in poor therapeutic control compared with nonabusers.
Furthermore, schizophrenia patients who abuse alcohol or
drugs are often less compliant with their neuroleptic treatment
(Drake et al., 1989) and report discontinuing neuroleptics dur-
ing phases of substance abuse because of concerns about medi-
cation-drug interactions (Pristach & Smith, 1990). The poor
outcome of schizophrenia patients who are substance abusers
appears to be due to a combination of the psychomimetic ef-
fects of the drugs themselves (e.g., Knudsen & Vilmar, 1984), as
well as noncompliance with treatments that are generally effec-
tive with this population (e.g., medication).
In addition to the impact of substance abuse on schizophre-
nia symptoms and rehospitalizations, substance abuse is asso-
ciated with an increased risk of suicide, \bung male schizophre-
nia patients with a history of substance abuse are particularly
vulnerable to suicidal ideation and attempts (Cohen, Test, &
Brown, 1990; Landmark, Cernovsky, & Merskey, 1987). The
link between substance abuse and suicidal behavior is not lim-
ited to schizophrenia. Substance abuse is also implicated in a
high proportion of suicides among the general population
(Fowler, Rich, & \bung, 1986), and it has been repeatedly found
that people with primary substance disorders have a high mor-
tality for suicide (Hesselbrock, Meyer, & Keener, 1985; Whit-
ters, Cadoret, & Widmer, 1985). The relation between suicide
and substance abuse in schizophrenia is of special clinical con-
cern because all patients with schizophrenia have an elevated
risk of suicide (Roy, 1986), which is apparently increased fur-
ther by concomitant substance use. It is not known whether
schizophrenia and substance abuse are simply independent risk
factors for suicide, or whether substance abuse potentiates the
willingness to act on suicidal ideation in a subset of vulnerable
schizophrenia patients. Suicidal ideation is a strong correlate of
depression in schizophrenia. The association between sub-
stance abuse and suicide in schizophrenia suggests that treat-
ments targeted at dual-diagnosis patients may need to address
depression to improve long-term outcome.
Cognitive Effects of Substance Abuse
Cognitive deficits have been hypothesized to be central to the
etiology and course of schizophrenia (e.g., Nuechterlein & Daw-
son, 1984a). Cognitive theories of schizophrenia have empha-
sized the pre-eminent role of impairments in information pro-
cessing, attention, and memory (for reviews, see Braff, 1991;
Nuechterlein & Dawson, 1984b). Schizophrenia patients, how-
ever, often demonstrate a generalized cognitive deficit across
measures of cognitive functioning (Braff et al., 1991; Chapman
& Chapman, 1973). Although the cognitive correlates of schizo-
phrenia have received extensive investigation, a neglected issue
concerns the role that comorbid alcohol and drug use may play
in the etiology or exacerbation of these cognitive deficits. In this
section, we review briefly the cognitive sequelae of alcohol and
drug use to highlight the potential importance of these effects
in schizophrenia patients with comorbid substance abuse.
In reviewing the neurocognitive correlates of alcoholism, we
focus on the impairments observed in non-Korsakoff alco-
holics and do not discuss the deficits that characterize the rela-
tively uncommon Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (which results
850 K. MUESER, A. BELLACK, AND J. BLANCHARD
from chronic alcoholism and thiamin deficiency; see Green-
berg & Diamond, 1985). Long-term alcohol abuse has been
found to be associated with increased neurocognitive impair-
ment: Neuropsychological paradigms have found deficits in ab-
stract reasoning, learning, attention and information process-
ing, complex perceptual-motor abilities, and memory in people
with histories of alcoholism (e.g., Grant, 1987; Grant, Adams, &
Reed, 1986; Parsons & Leber, 1981; Tarter & Edwards, 1985).
An important limitation in much of this literature is that
most studies have been conducted with recently detoxified alco-
holics. Few studies have been conducted after longer periods of
abstinence (e.g., months or years) to determine the durability of
these cognitive deficits. Accumulating evidence, however, sug-
gests that there is long-term recovery of some cognitive func-
tioning after continued abstinence (Adams, Grant, & Reed,
1980; Grant, Adams, & Reed, 1984), although cognitive impair-
ment may persist despite months or years of sobriety (Brandt,
Butters, Ryan, & Bayog, 1983; Fabian & Parsons, 1983; Parsons,
Schaeffer, & Glenn, 1990; Ryan, DiDario, Butters, & Adinolfi,
1980). The enduring effects of alcohol on cognitive functioning,
despite abstinence, may be due to irreversible neurological in-
sult. For example, it has been proposed that alcohol abuse can
lead to long-term impairment in memory through permanent
damage to diencephalic structures (Brandt et al., 1983).
Although less research has been conducted on the neurocog-
nitive effects of nonalcohol psychoactive drug use, evidence
indicates a cause for concern (Reed & Grant, 1990). Polydrug
abuse has been found to be related to neuropsychological im-
pairment, particularly in verbal and perceptual-motor abilities
(Grant et al., 1978; Grant & Judd, 1976), and electroencephalo-
graph abnormalities (Grant & Judd, 1976). More specifically,
recent studies also suggest that cognitive impairments may be
associated with cocaine abuse (Herning, Glover, Koeppl, Wed-
dington, & Jaffe, 1990; O'Malley & Gawin, 1990). The attribu-
tion of neurocognitive and neuropathological findings to a sin-
gle drug or class of drugs is, however, a difficult task given the
prevalent use of multiple substances in abusers (e.g., Grant et al.,
1978; Mueser et al., 1990). Results from the EGA study (Regier
et al., 1990) document the high rate of comorbidity between
alcohol and drug use disorders: 21.5% of individuals with an
alcohol use disorder also had another drug abuse-dependence
disorder in their lifetime, whereas of those individuals with a
drug use disorder, 47.3% also had a lifetime history of alcohol
abuse-dependence.
In addition to the cognitive deficits outlined previously, neu-
roanatomical abnormalities have also been found to be asso-
ciated with substance abuse, especially alcoholism. Neuroim-
aging studies indicate that suical widening and ventricular dila-
tion in alcoholics appear to be the most frequent findings
(Jernigan et al., 1991; Jernigan, Pfefferbaum, & Zatz, 1986;
Ron, 1987; Wilkinson, 1987). As with neurocognitive deficits,
some structural abnormalities may slowly resolve with pro-
longed abstinence (Ron, 1987; Wilkinson, 1985,1987). These
findings are interesting because cortical atrophy and ventricu-
lar enlargement have been observed to occur in at least a sub-
population of schizophrenics (for a review, see Raz & Raz,
1990). Thus, individuals with schizophrenia, who may have neu-
roanatomical abnormalities associated with this disorder, may
be at heightened risk for even greater neuropathology if they
also abuse alcohol.
The precise etiology of the observed cognitive and neuro-
pathological findings associated with alcohol and drug use is
not yet clear. These deficits are probably best viewed as deter-
mined by multiple factors. Thus, pathological findings may be
the result of the direct neurotoxic effects of abused substances
or may be related to neuromedical risk factors that abusers are
exposed to, including head trauma, cerebral vascular disease,
nutritional deficit, and liver dysfunction (Adams & Grant,
1986; Grant etal., 1984).
The foregoing review suggests that long-term substance
abuse, particularly alcohol abuse-dependence, may further im-
pair the already compromised cognitive functioning of schizo-
phrenia patients. Additionally, the prevalence of neurocogni-
tive impairments and neuroanatomical anomalies associated
with schizophrenia itself may conceivably make these patients
even more vulnerable than other individuals to the pernicious
cognitive and neuropathological effects of alcohol and drug
abuse. Despite the accumulation of data regarding the preva-
lence of substance use disorders in schizophrenia, there are no
systematic studies of the cognitive correlates of substance abuse
in this population. Thus, many questions regarding the cogni-
tive effects of concomitant substance abuse in schizophrenia
await further study: If comorbid substance abuse in schizophre-
nia results in further cognitive impairment, is this impairment
simply additive or does a different pattern of cognitive distur-
bance emerge in abusing versus nonabusing patients? Further-
more, does the potential cognitive impairment associated with
substance abuse in schizophrenia ameliorate with abstinence?
How do neuroleptics and adjunctive medications interact with
abused substances with regard to cognitive functioning? Given
that male schizophrenia patients, in comparison to female
schizophrenia patients, typically have an earlier age of onset
and poorer course of illness (Goldstein, 1988; Lewine, 1981;
Loranger, 1984), as well as a greater prevalence of neuroana-
tomical anomalies (Andreasen, Ehrhardt, et al., 1990; Andrea-
sen, Swayze, et al., 1990; Raz & Raz, 1990), are there gender
differences in the cognitive effects of substance abuse in schizo-
phrenia?
A final area of concern regards the treatment implications of
the possible cognitive deficits associated with alcohol and drug
abuse. Studies conducted with schizophrenia patients and indi-
viduals with alcohol use disorders suggest that cognitive deficits
have important implications for the efficacy of treatment inter-
ventions. For example, memory impairments in schizophrenia
patients have been shown to be related to greater severity of
social skills deficits prior to treatment and to predict poorer
acquisition of these behaviors after participation in a social
skills training program (Mueser, Bellack, Douglas, & Wade,
1991). With regard to the treatment of alcoholism, there is some
suggestion that pretreatment neuropsychological impairment
is related to a greater likelihood of relapse (Parsons, 1987). Al-
though these findings are preliminary in nature, they do indi-
cate a need to integrate research on cognitive functioning when
considering treatment for schizophrenia patients with comor-
bid substance abuse.
Treatment
Drug and alcohol use by schizophrenia patients is one of the
most pressing problems facing the mental health system. We
 SPECIAL SECTION: SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
discussed previously the widespread abuse of substances by
schizophrenia patients, particularly by younger male patients.
To some extent the epidemiological data understate the prob-
lem. In many urban hospitals and community mental health
centers abuse is so common that it is assumed that any new
patient has a problem with substances until it is proven other-
wise. Excessive substance use by schizophrenics has most of the
same social, health, economic, and psychiatric consequences
that it has for other individuals. Moreover, as indicated previ-
ously, it has additional serious consequences for comorbid pa-
tients. It increases the risk of symptom exacerbation and re-
lapse, it may compromise the efficacy of neuroleptics, and it
decreases compliance with treatment. It often serves as a signifi-
cant source of conflict in families that are already under great
stress, a pernicious circumstance for schizophrenia patients
who are highly vulnerable to heightened stress (Hooley, 1985).
Substance use also has deleterious cognitive effects that are su-
perimposed on an information-processing system that is al-
ready compromised (Bellack, 1992).
Clearly, substance abuse by schizophrenia patients cannot be
ignored. However, until recently it has been given scant atten-
tion by mental health professionals. The public health system,
where most schizophrenia patients are treated, has tradition-
ally been compartmentalized such that treatment for psychiat-
ric and substance use problems has been provided by different
agencies. This arrangement has many advantages; however, it
has proven to be a disaster for dually diagnosed patients, partic-
ularly those with schizophrenia (Drake, Osher, & Wallach,
1991). It is now well known that schizophrenia patients have
difficulty navigating diverse treatment and social service pro-
grams and tend to "fall between the cracks" (Bachrach, 1981).
This problem has been compounded for dually diagnosed pa-
tients as they present special problems that traditional sub-
stance abuse and psychiatric programs have neither been will-
ing nor been able to deal with, even when patients have been
able to access treatment facilities (McLellan, Luborsky, Woody,
O'Brien, & Druley, 1983).
Substance abuse and psychiatric treatment programs have
evolved a different ethos or philosophy over time (Minkoff,
1991). The majority of addiction programs are based on the
12-step approach characteristic of Alcoholics Anonymous
(AA). They use confrontation as a therapeutic tool (i.e., to get
the patient to realize the consequences of abuse and accept
himself or herself as an addict), and they emphasize the need
for self-control and personal responsibility. They also often re-
quire abstinence as a precondition for participation in treat-
ment rather than as a goal and tend to eschew the use of sub-
stances of all kinds (including prescribed medications). These
strategies are all counterproductive with schizophrenia pa-
tients. This may not be an ideal approach with patients who
have cognitive deficits and may be at increased vulnerability to
the effects of interpersonal stress. They often are unable to
admit to errors or problems or to see the connection between
their behavior and their symptoms or life situations (Bellack,
Mueser, Wade, Sayers, & Morrison, 1992). Thus, they may be
unable to realistically agree to abstinence early on in treatment,
and confrontational strategies may be stress-provoking and in-
crease the risk of relapse. Finally, they generally require the
851
long-term use of neuroleptics and other medications, which
conflicts with AA^s philosophy.
Psychiatric treatment programs traditionally emphasize tol-
erance, support, and caring. These attributes are desirable for
treating schizophrenia but may not be helpful for dealing with
substance abuse. Substance use is often ignored or discounted
by psychiatric staff until and unless it interferes with treatment
or creates a crisis in the family, at which time the patient may be
referred to a primary substance abuse program for ancillary
care. Thus, neither traditional substance abuse programs nor
psychiatric programs are sufficient for dually diagnosed pa-
tients, and in some cases they may be countertherapeutic.
Treatment Needs
The problem of substance abuse in schizophrenia has gener-
ated a large literature, but to date there have been no double-
blind controlled trials of an intervention specifically designed
to deal with this pernicious combination. Hence, the following
discussion is derived from conceptual papers, a handful of pub-
lished uncontrolled trials and demonstration projects, and our
own experience. Surprisingly, there is a broad agreement on a
number of requirements for effective treatment. First and fore-
most is the contention that dually diagnosed patients need a
special program that integrates elements of both psychiatric
and substance abuse treatment (Drake, Osher, & Wallach, 1991;
Lehman et al., 1989). These elements can derive from geograph-
ically distinct programs, but only if both interventions are con-
current and actively coordinated (Drake, McLaughlin, Pepper,
& Minkoff, 1991). Sequencing separate treatments for each
condition is thought to be ineffective. Single programs that
combine the diverse elements needed are apt to do a better job
of integration, be more cost efficient, and be easier for patients
to navigate. However, such programs run counter to established
practice, and few exist.
A second requirement for effective treatment is careful as-
sessment (Lehman et al., 1989; Test et al., 1989). Schizophrenia
is by itself a heterogeneous entity, and the addition of substance
abuse simply creates more permutations. To be effective, a pro-
gram must consider individual differences in both substance
use patterns and psychiatric status. Patients differ in the type of
substance(s) used, and the degree of use varies from recre-
ational to abuse to dependence. As discussed previously, the
reasons for use also differ, and include social pressure, bore-
dom, and the desire to feel and act normal. Patients also differ
in the degree to which they can actively participate in pro-
grams, assume responsibility for their behavior, and use self-
control to withstand temptation.
This variability is particularly germane to substance abuse
strategies. For example, one of the most promising techniques
for primary substance abusers is relapse prevention (S. M. Hall,
Wasserman, & Havassy, 1991; Marlatt & Gordon, 1985; Schiff-
man, 1992). This is a cognitive-behavioral approach in which
patients are taught to avoid relapses by anticipating and avoid-
ing risk situations, learning social skills to deal with social pres-
sures and using cognitive coping skills to help control urges and
prevent minor lapses from leading to full-blown relapses. This
approach is likely to be helpful for patients whose substance use
often occurs in predictable social situations. This approach
852 K. MUESER, A. BELLACK, AND J. BLANCHARD
may have limited applicability for patients with notable cogni-
tive impairment, who might be unable to learn to anticipate
problem situations and use the requisite cognitive strategies
(Bellack, Morrison, & Mueser, 1989).
It is doubtful that relapse prevention training, if provided in a
vaccuum, will have a substantive effect on substance abuse in
schizophrenia. However, embedding training in relapse pre-
vention into a comprehensive treatment program for schizo-
phrenia, including psychosocial interventions such as social
skills training (Carey, Carey, & Meisler, 1990; Morrison & Bel-
lack, 1984), behavioral or psychoeducational family therapy
(Mueser & Glynn, 1990), and assertive community-based case
management (Bond, McDonel, Miller, & Pensec, 1991; Stein &
Test, 1980), is more likely to decrease substance abuse and im-
prove the course of the illness. Treatment for substance abuse
in schizophrenia needs to be integrated with broad-based psy-
chosocial rehabilitation strategies because no clear line de-
marks substance abuse problems from social and symptom
problems characteristic of the illness. Thus, a schizophrenia
patient who abuses drugs or alcohol in social settings may not
only need to be taught to recognize and cope more effectively
with these situations but may also benefit from social skills
training aimed at helping the patient establish relationships
with nonabusing peers. Similarly, a patient who is the object of
excessive parental criticism who abuses substances as an at-
tempt to cope with or avoid this negative affect may require
relapse prevention training combined with family intervention
designed to ameliorate the affective climate of the family. This
approach to integrating treatments is consistent with the fact
that education about the deleterious effects of substance abuse
is already provided in family therapy programs (e.g., Falloon,
Boyd, & McGill, 1984) and some approaches to social skills
training (e.g., symptom management training; Liberman &
Corrigan, in press).
Reducing the use of addictive substances is a difficult pro-
cess under the best of circumstances, and treatment programs
for nonpsychiatrically impaired abusers have had only limited
success, with little evidence suggesting differential outcomes
for different treatment models (Nathan & Skinstad, 1987; So-
bell, Toneatto, & Sobell, 1990). Yet, many more people are able
to quit on their own than through treatment (Tucker & Sobell,
1992). Factors that facilitate abstinence and controlled use of
substances include high levels of motivation to quit, the ability
to exert self-control in the face of temptation (urges), and social
support or social pressure. Unfortunately, the schizophrenic
abuser often has limitations in each of these areas. As indicated
previously, schizophrenic abusers typically have difficulty per-
ceiving (or accepting) the dangers of continued use, and thus are
not highly motivated to reduce consumption. Many patients
continue to experience disruptive (psychotic) symptoms and
unpleasant emotions and have residual cognitive impairment
even when the acute phase of the illness is in remission. Hence,
they have limited ability to exert self-control and cope with the
stresses of craving for substances or social pressure to imbibe. A
great many schizophrenia patients are socially isolated and lack
the social support and the stimulus to abstain provided by
spouse, children, job, and friends (Osher & Kofoed, 1989).
Schizophrenia and substance abuse are not simply additive,
but tend to exacerbate one another, dramatically complicating
the treatment process. Consequently, treatment programs must
be multidimensional, long term, and flexible (Drake,
McLaughlin, Pepper, & Miakoff, 1991; TestetaL, 1989). Osher
and Kofoed (1989) have conceptualized treatment as a four-
stage process. The patient must first be engaged in treatment, a
process that might entail many false starts over months or
years. Next, the individual must be persuaded to "accept long-
term abstinence-oriented treatment" (p. 1027); this also is typi-
cally a gradual process (Kofoed & Keys, 1988). Once these two
stages have been achieved, the individual is ready for active
treatment, which involves teaching the skills needed to remain
sober. Finally, the patient must be taught relapse prevention
skills. The latter two stages require a variety of nonconfronta-
tional elements commonly used in treatment of primary sub-
stance abusers, including social skills training (Morrison & Bel-
lack, 1984), problem-solving training (Monti, Abrams, Kad-
den, & Cooney, 1989), and Marlatt's relapse prevention
program (Marlatt & Gordon, 1985).
Special consideration must also be given to the psychiatric
side of the equation. Effort must be directed to modify the
maladaptive living situation that many chronic schizophrenia
patients endure, including homelessness, joblessness, poverty,
boredom, and social isolation. Families must be involved when
possible, and social support should be increased. An adequate
medication regime must be determined, and the patient must
be taught the value of compliance. Finally, the diverse elements
of the program and other social service and medical needs must
be coordinated by an intensive case management system
(Drake, Osher, & Wallach, 1991; Test et al., 1989).
We would be remiss if we did not emphasize that substance
abuse by schizophrenia patients is a societal problem, not sim-
ply a problem for the mental health establishment. It is, in part,
a consequence of deinstitutionalization and the associated fail-
ure to provide enough resources to fund mental health and
social services in the community on the one hand, coupled with
mental health's failure to adequately deal with the causes of
drug use and availability of drugs in the country. The mental
health establishment is quite capable of developing effective
treatment programs for the dually diagnosed patient. However,
mental health professionals are unlikely to make a significant
dent in the problem until and unless the United States resolves
the broader societal issues and provides adequate funding to
care for these disadvantaged and severely handicapped individ-
uals. Schizophrenia patients are more like their peers than they
are different from their peers. If drug use is common in their
environment, they are at least as vulnerable as their peers un-
less they are so handicapped that they cannot access suppliers
(Mueser et al., 1992). If mental health professionals expect sub-
stance abusers to abstain or minimize use, they must provide
an alternative to poverty, boredom, and hopelessness.
Conclusion
The literature on substance abuse and schizophrenia is con-
centrated in the past 10 years, and particularly in the past 5
years. These dual dysfunctions have undoubtedly coexisted for
some time, but they have only recently drawn the attention of
the scientific and mental health establishments. This surge of
interest is probably associated with the increase in illicit sub-
 SPECIAL SECTION: SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
stance abuse over the past 25 years in our society, especially the
recent "crack" cocaine epidemic.
This has been a frustrating topic to review, as so little is
known about the causes, effects, or treatment of schizophrenia
patients with comorbid substance abuse disorders. It has been
easy to raise questions and identify issues in need of further
study, but we can draw few firm conclusions other than that
substance abuse is a pernicious problem for schizophrenia pa-
tients that has reached crisis proportions. In addition to the
specific questions raised in each section of this article, we can
conclude with one general recommendation: Understanding
and solving this problem will require collaboration by experts
on schizophrenia and substance abuse. Traditionally, these two
groups have worked independently in separate programs, pub-
lished in different journals, and received research funds from
separate agencies (e.g., National Institute on Drug Abuse, Na-
tional Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, and
NIMH). Integration is essential at all levels to develop effective
treatment strategies for this population.
References
Adams, K. M., & Grant, I. (1986). Influence of premorbid risk factors
on neuropsychological performance in alcoholics. Journal of Clini-
cal and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 362-370.
Adams, K. M., Grant, I., & Reed, R. (1980). Neuropsychology in alco-
holic men their late thirties: One-year follow-up. American Journal
of Psychiatry, 137, 928-931.
Aiken, L. S. (1986). Retrospective self-reports by clients differ from
original reports: Implications for the evaluation of drug treatment
programs. The International Journal of The Addictions, 21, 767-788.
Alterman, A. I., Erdlen, D. L., LaPorte, D. J., & Erdlen, F. R. (1982).
Effects of illicit drug use in an inpatient psychiatric population.
Addictive Behaviors, 7, 231-242.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical
manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
Ananth, I, Vandewater, S., Kamal, M., Brodsky, A., Gamal, R., &
Miller, M. (1989). Mixed diagnosis of substance abuse in psychiatric
patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 297-299.
Andreasen, N. C, Ehrhardt, J. C, Swayze, V W, Alliger, R. J., Yuh,
W. T. C., Cohen, G, & Ziebell, S. (1990). Magnetic resonance imaging
of the brain in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47,
35-44.
Andreasen, N. C, Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., & Winokur, G. (1977).
The family history method using diagnostic criteria. Archives of Gen-
eral Psychiatry, 34, 1229-1235.
Andreasen, N. C., Rice, J., Endicott, J., Reich, T, & Coryell, W (1986).
The family history approach to diagnosis. Archives of 'GeneralPsychi-
atry, 43, 421-429.
Andreasen, N. C., Swayze, V W, Flaum, M., Yates, W R., Arndt, S., &
McChesney, C. (1990). Ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia
evaluated with computed tomographic scanning: Effects of gender,
age, and stage of illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 1008-
1015.
Austin, G. A., Macari, M. A., & Lettieri, D. J. (Eds.). (1978). Research
issues 23: International drug use. Rockville, MD: National Institute
on Drug Abuse, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Wel-
fare.
Bachrach, L. L. (1981). Continuity of care for chronic mental patients:
A conceptual analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 138, 1449-
1456.
Barbee, J. G, Clark, P. D., Crapanzano, M. S., Heintz, G. C, & Kehoe,
853
C. E. (1989). Alcohol and substance abuse among schizophrenic pa-
tients presenting to an emergency psychiatric service. Journal of Ner-
vous and Mental Disease, 177, 400-407.
Bellack, A. S. (1992). Cognitive rehabilitation for schizophrenia: Is it
possible? Is it necessary? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 18, 43-50.
Bellack, A. S., Morrison, R. L., & Mueser, K. T. (1989). Social problem
solving in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15,101-116.
Bellack, A. S., Mueser, K. T, Wade, J., Sayers, S. L., & Morrison, R. L.
(1992). The ability of schizophrenics to perceive and cope with nega-
tive affect. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 473-480.
Berkson, J. (1946). Limitations of the application of four-fold tables to
hospital data. Biometric Bulletin, 2, 47-53.
Bernadt, M. W, & Murray, R. M. (1986). Psychiatric disorder, drinking
and alcoholism: What are the links? British Journal of Psychiatry,
148, 393-400.
Bond, G. R., McDonel, E. C., Miller, L. D, & Pensec, M. (1991). Asser-
tive community treatment and reference groups: An evaluation of
their effectiveness for young adults with serious mental illness and
substance abuse problems. Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 15, 31-43.
Bowers, M. B., & Swigar, M. E. (1983). Vulnerability to psychosis asso-
ciated with hallucinogen use. Psychiatry Research, 9, 91-97.
Braff, D. L. (1991). Information processing and attentional abnormali-
ties in the schizophrenic disorders. In P. E. Magaro (Ed.), Cognitive
bases of mental disorders (pp. 262-307). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Braff, D. L., Heaton, R., Kuck, J., Cullum, M., Moranville, I, Grant, L,
& Zisook, S. (1991). The generalized pattern of neuropsychological
deficits in outpatients with chronic schizophrenia with heteroge-
neous Wisconsin Card Sorting Test results. Archives of General Psy-
chiatry, 45,891-898.
Brandt, J., Butters, N., Ryan, C, & Bayog, R. (1983). Cognitive loss and
recovery in long-term alcohol abusers. Archives of General Psychia-
try, 40, 435-442.
Breakey, W R., Goodell, H., Lorenz, P. C., & McHugh, P. R. (1974).
Hallucinogenic drugs as precipitants of schizophrenia. Psychologi-
cal Medicine, 4, 255-261.
Bunt, G., Galanter, M., Lifshutz, H., & Castaneda, R. (1990). Cocaine/
"crack" dependence among psychiatric inpatients. American Jour-
nal of Psychiatry, 147,1542-1546.
Carey, M. P., Carey, K. B, & Meisler, A. W (1990). Training mentally ill
chemical abusers in social problem solving. Behavior Therapy, 21,
511-518.
Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1973). Disordered thought in schizo-
phrenia. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Chen, C., Balogh, M., Bathija, J., Howanitz, E., Plutchik, R., & Conte,
H. R. (1992). Substance abuse among psychiatric inpatients. Com-
prehensive Psychiatry, 33, 60-64.
Cleghorn, J. M., Kaplan, R. D, Szechtman, B., Szechtman, H., Brown,
G. M., & Franco, S. (1991). Substance abuse and schizophrenia: Ef-
fect on symptoms but not neurocognitive function. Journal of Clini-
cal Psychiatry, 52, 26-30.
Cohen, L. J., Test, M. A., & Brown, R. L. (1990). Suicide and schizo-
phrenia: Data from a prospective community treatment study. Amer-
ican Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 602-607.
Dixon, L., Haas, G, Weiden, P. J., Sweeney, J., & Frances, A. J. (1990).
Acute effects of drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: Clinical obser-
vations and patients' self-reports. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 16, 69-79.
Dixon, L., Haas, G, Weiden, P. J., Sweeney, J., & Frances, A. J. (1991).
Drug abuse in schizophrenic patients: Clinical correlates and rea-
sons for use. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 224-230.
Donovan, D. M., & Marlatt, D. A. (Eds.). (1988). Assessment of addic-
tive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press.
Drake, R. E., McLaughlin, P., Pepper, B., & Minkoff, K. (1991). Dual
diagnosis of major mental illness and substance disorder: An over-
view. In K. Minkoff & R. E. Drake (Eds.), Dual diagnosis of major
854 K. MUESER, A. BELLACK, AND J. BLANCHARD
mental illness and substance disorder (pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jos-
sey-Bass.
Drake, R. E., Osher, F. C, Noordsy, D. L., Hurlbut, S. C, Teague, G. B.,
& Beaudett, M. S. (1990). Diagnosis of alcohol use disorders in
schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 16, 57-67.
Drake, R. E., Osher, F. C, & Wallach, M. A. (1989). Alcohol use and
abuse in schizophrenia: A prospective community study. Journal of
Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 408-414.
Drake, R. E., Osher, F. C, & Wallach, M. A. (1991). Homelessness and
dual diagnosis. American Psychologist, 46, 1149-1158.
Fabian, M. S., & Parsons, O. A. (1983). Differential improvement of
cognitive functions in recovering alcoholic women. Journal of Ab-
normal Psychology, 92, 87-95.
Falloon, I. R. H., Boyd, J. L., & McGill, C. W. (1984). Family care of
schizophrenia. New York: Guilford Press.
Fowler, R. C., Rich, C. L., & Young, D. (1986). San Diego suicide study
II. Substance abuse in young cases. Archives of General Psychiatry,
43, 962-965.
Freed, E. X. (1975). Alcoholism and schizophrenia: The search for
perspectives. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 853-881.
Galanter, M., Castaneda, R., & Ferman, J. (1988). Substance abuse
among general psychiatric patients: Place of presentation, diagnosis
and treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 142,
211-235.
Gershon, E. S., DeLisi, L. E., Hamovit, J., Nurhberger, J. I., Jr., Max-
well, M. E., Schreiber, J., Dauphinais, D, Dingman, C. W, II, &
GurofF, J. J. (1988). A controlled family study of chronic psychosis.
Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 328-336.
Goldstein, J. M. (1988). Gender differences in the course of schizophre-
nia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 684-689.
Gorelick, D. A., Irwin, M. R., Schmidt-Lackner, S., & Marder, S. (1990).
Alcoholism among male schizophrenic inpatients. Annals of Clinical
Psychiatry, 2, 19-22.
Grant, I. (1987). Alcohol and the brain: Neuropsychological correlates.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 310-324.
Grant, 1., Adams, K. M., Carlin, A. S., Rennick, P. M., Judd, L. L., &
Schoof, K. (1978). The collaborative neuropsychological study of
polydrug users. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35,1063-1074.
Grant, I., Adams, K. M., & Reed, R. (1984). Aging, abstinence, and
medical risk factors in the prediction of neuropsychologic deficit in
long-term alcoholics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 710-718.
Grant, I., Adams, K. M., & Reed, R. (1986). Intermediate-duration
(subacute) organic mental disorder of alcoholism. In I. Grant (Ed.),
Neuropsychiatric correlates of alcoholism (pp. 37-60). Washington,
DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Grant, I., & Judd, L. L. (1976). Neuropsychological and EEC distur-
bances in polydrug users. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133,1039-
1042.
Greenberg, D. A., & Diamond, I. (1985). Wernicke-Korsakoff syn-
drome. In R. E. Tarter & D. A. Van Thiel (Eds.), Alcohol and the
brain: Chronic effects (pp. 295-314). New York: Plenum Press.
Hall, R. C. W, Popkin, M. K., Beresford, T. P., & Hall, A. K. (1988).
Amphetamine psychosis: Clinical presentations and differential
diagnosis. Psychiatric Medicine, 6, 73-79.
Hall, R. C. W, Popkin, M. K., & DeVaul, R. (1977). The effect of
unrecognized drug abuse on diagnosis and therapeutic outcome.
American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 4, 455-465.
Hall, S. M., Wasserman, D. A., & Havassy, B. E. (1991). Relapse preven-
tion. In R. W Pickins, C. G. Leukefeld, & C. R. Schuster (Eds.),
Improving drug abuse treatment (Research monograph No. 106, pp.
279-292). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.
HanseH, N., & Willis, G. L. (1977). Outpatient treatment of schizophre-
nia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1082-1086.
Hensala, J. D., Epstein, L. J., & Blacker, K. H. (1967). LSD and psychiat-
ric inpatients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 554-559.
Herning, R. I., Glover, B. J., Koeppl, B., Weddington, W, & Jane, J. H.
(1990). Cognitive deficits in abstaining cocaine abusers. In J. W
Spence & J. J. Boren (Eds.), Residual effects of abused drugs on behav-
ior (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph No. 101,
pp. 167-178). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Hesselbrock, M. N., Meyer, R. E., & Keener, J. J. (1985). Psychopathol-
ogy in hospitalized alcoholics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42,
1050-1055.
Hollister, L. E. (1986). Health aspects of canabis. Pharmacology Re-
view, 38, 1-20.
Hooley, J. (1985). Expressed emotion: A review of the critical literature.
Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 119-140.
Javitt, D. C. (1987). Negative schizophrenic symptomatology and the
PCP (phencyclidine) model of schizophrenia. Hillside Journal of Psy-
chiatry, 9, 12-35.
Jernigan, T. L., Butters, N., DiTraglia, G., Schaeffer, K., Smith, T,
Irwin, M., Grant, I., Schuckit, M., &Cermack, L. S. (1991). Reduced
cerebral grey matter observed in alcoholics using magnetic reso-
nance imaging. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 15,
418-427.
Jernigan, T. L., Pfefferbaum, A., & Zatz, L. M. (1986). Computed to-
mography correlates in alcoholism. In I. Grant (Ed.), Neuropsychiat-
ric correlates of alcoholism (pp. 21 -36). Washington, DC: American
Psychiatric Press.
Khantzian, E. J. (1985). The self-medication hypothesis of addictive
disorders: Focus on heroin and cocaine dependence. American Jour-
nal of Psychiatry, 142,1259-1264.
Knudsen, P., & Vilmar, T. (1984). Cannabis and neuroleptic agents in
schizophrenia. Ada Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 69,162-174.
Kofoed, L. L., & Keys, A. (1988). Using group therapy to persuade
dual-diagnosis patients to seek treatment. Hospital and Community
Psychiatry, 39, 1209-1211.
Koretic, D, & Hotujac, L. (1987). Alcohol intake by schizophrenics.
Alcoholism, 23, 37-42.
Kushner, M. G., & Mueser, K. T. (in press). Psychiatric comorbidity with
alcohol disorders. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcohol-
ism Eighth Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and
Health. (Available from: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental
Health Administration, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857)
Kushner, M. Q, Sher, K. J., & Beitman, B. D. (1990). The relation
between alcohol problems and the anxiety disorders. American Jour-
nal of Psychiatry, 147, 685-695.
Landmark, J., Cernovsky, Z. Z., & Merskey, H. (1987). Correlates of
suicide attempts and ideation in schizophrenia. British Journal of
Psychiatry. 151, 18-20.
Lehman, A. F, Myers, C. P., & Corty, E. (1989). Assessment and classifi-
cation of patients with psychiatric and substance abuse syndromes.
Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 1019-1025.
Lewine, R. R. (1981). Sex differences in schizophrenia: Timing or sub-
types? Psychological Bulletin, 90, 432-444.
Liberman, R. P., & Corrigan, P. W (in press). Designing new psychoso-
cial treatments for schizophrenia. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Bio-
logical Processes.
Lieberman, J. A., Jody, D., Geisler, S., Vital-Herne, J., Alvir, J. M. J.,
Walsleben, J., & Woerner, M. G. (1989). Treatment outcome of first
episode schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 25, 92-96.
Lieberman, J. A., Kinon, B. J., & Loebel, A. D. (1990). Dopaminergic
mechanisms in idiopathic and drug-induced psychoses. Schizophre-
nia Bulletin, 16, 97-110.
Loranger, A. W (1984). Sex differences in age at onset of schizophre-
nia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 157-161.
 SPECIAL SECTION: SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Magliozzi, J. R., Kanter, S. L., Csernansky, J. G, & Hollister, L. E.
(1983). Detection of marijuana use in psychiatric patients by deter-
mination of urinary delta-9-tetrahydrocannabino-l 1-oic acid. Jour-
nal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171, 246-249.
Marlatt, G. A., & Gordon, J. R. (Eds.). (1985). Relapse prevention: Main-
tenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York:
Guilford Press.
McLellan, A. T, Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., O'Brien, C. P., & Druley,
K. A. (1983). Predicting response to alcohol and drug abuse treat-
ments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 620-625.
Minkoff, K. (1991). Program components of a comprehensive inte-
grated care system for seriously mentally ill patients with substance
disorders. In K. Minkoff & R. E. Drake (Eds.), Dual diagnosis of
major mental illness and substance disorder (pp. 13-28). San Fran-
cisco: Jossey-Bass.
Monti, P. M., Abrams, D. B., Kadden, R. M., & Cooney, N. L. (1989).
Treating alcohol dependence. New York: Guilford Press.
Morrison, R. L., & Bellack, A. S. (1984). Social skills training. In A. S.
Bel\ac\s.(Ed),Schizophrenia:Treatment, management, and rehabilita-
tion (pp. 247-279). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., & Mueser, K. T. (1988). Deficits in
facial-affect recognition and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin,
14, 67-83.
Mueser, K. T, Bellack, A. S., Douglas, M. S., & Wade, J. H. (1991).
Prediction of social skill acquisition in schizophrenic and major
affective disorder patients from memory and symptomatology. Psy-
chiatry Research, 37, 281-296.
Mueser, K. T, & Glynn, S. M. (1990). Behavioral family therapy for
schizophrenia. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller (Eds.),
Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 26, pp. 122-147). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage.
Mueser, K. X, Yarnold, P. R., & Bellack, A. S. (1992). Diagnostic and
demographic correlates of substance abuse in schizophrenia and
major affective disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 85, 48-55.
Mueser, K. X, Yarnold, P. R., Levinson, D. E, Singh, H., Bellack, A. S.,
Kee, K., Morrison, R. L., & Yadalam, K. G. (1990). Prevalence of
substance abuse in schizophrenia: Demographic and clinical corre-
lates. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 16, 31-56.
Nathan, P. E., & Skinstad, A. H. (1987). Outcomes of treatment for
alcohol problems: Current methods, problems, and results. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 332-340.
Negrete, J. C, Knapp, W P., Douglas, D. E., & Smith, W B. (1986).
Cannabis affects the severity of schizophrenic symptoms: Results of
a clinical survey. Psychological Medicine, 16, 515-520.
Nuechterlein, K. H., & Dawson, M. E. (1984a). A heuristic vulnerabil-
ity/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schizophrenia Bulletin,
W, 300-312.
Nuechterlein, K. H., & Dawson, M. E. (1984b). Information processing
and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizo-
phrenic disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10,160-203.
O'Malley, S. S., & Gawin, E H. (1990). Abstinence symptomatology
and neuropsychological impairment in chronic cocaine abusers. In
J. W Spence & J. J. Boren (Eds.), Residual effects of abused drugs on
behavior (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph
No. 101, pp. 179-190). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug
Abuse.
Osher, F. C., & Kofoed, L. L. (1989). Treatment of patients with psychi-
atric and psychoactive substance abuse disorder. Hospital and Com-
munity Psychiatry, 40,1025-1030.
Parker, J. B., Meiller, R. M., & Andrews, G. W (1960). Major psychiat-
ric disorders masquerading as alcoholism. Southern Medical Jour-
nal, 53, 560-564.
Parsons, O. A. (1987). Do neuropsychological deficits predict alco-
holics' treatment course and recovery? In O. A. Parsons, N. Butters,
855
& P. E. Nathan (Eds.), Neuropsychology of alcoholism: Implications
for diagnosis and treatment (pp. 273-290). New York: Guilford
Press.
Parsons, O. A., & Leber, W R. (1981). The relationship between cogni-
tive dysfunction and brain damage in alcoholics: Causal, interactive,
or epiphenomenal? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Re-
search, 5, 326-343.
Parsons, O. A., Schaeffer, K. W, & Glenn, S. W (1990). Does neuropsy-
chological test performance predict resumption of drinking in post-
treatment alcoholics? Addictive Behaviors, 15, 297-307.
Pepper, B., Kirshner, M. C, & Ryglewicz, H. (1981). The young adult
chronic patient: Overview of a population. Hospital and Community
Psychiatry, 32, 463-469.
Peralta, V, & Cuesta, M. J. (1992). Influence of cannabis abuse on
schizophrenic psychopathology. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 85,
127-130.
Pope, H. G, lonescu-Pioggia, M., Aizley, H. G, & Varma, D. K. (1990).
Drug use and life style among college undergraduates in 1989: A
comparison with 1969 and 1978. American Journal of Psychiatry,
147, 998-1001.
Pristach, C. A., & Smith, C. M. (1990). Medication compliance and
substance abuse among schizophrenic patients. Hospital and Com-
munity Psychiatry, 41,1345-1348.
Raz, S., & Raz, N. (1990). Structural brain abnormalities in the major
psychoses: A quantitative review of the evidence from computerized
imaging. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 93-108.
Reed, R. J., & Grant, I. (1990). The long-term neurobehavioral conse-
quences of substance abuse: Conceptual and methodological chal-
lenges for future research. In J. W Spence & J. J. Boren (Eds.), Resid-
ual effects of abused drugs on behavior (National Institute on Drug
Abuse Research Monograph No. 101, pp. 10-56). Washington, DC:
National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Regier, D. A., Farmer, M. E., Rae, D. S., Locke, B. Z., Keith, S. J., Judd,
L. L., & Goodwin, F. K. (1990). Comorbidity of mental disorders
with alcohol and other drug abuse. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 264, 2511-2518.
Richard, M. L., Liskow, B. I., & Perry, P. J. (1985). Recent psychostimu-
lant use in hospitalized schizophrenics. Journal of Clinical Psychia-
try, 46, 79-83.
Ridgely, M. S., Goldman, H. H., & Willenbring, M. (1990). Barriers to
the care of persons with dual diagnoses: Organizational and financ-
ing issues. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 16,123-132.
Ron, M. A. (1987). The brain of alcoholics: An overview. In O. A.
Parsons, N. Butters, & P. E. Nathan (Eds.), Neuropsychology of alco-
holism: Implications for diagnosis and treatment (pp. 11-20). New
York: Guilford Press.
Roy, A. (1986). Suicide in schizophrenia. In A. Roy (Ed.), Suicide (pp.
97-112). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Ryan, C, DiDario, B., Butters, N., & Adinolfi, A. (1980). The relation-
ship between abstinence and recovery of function in male alco-
holics. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2,125-134.
Safer, D. J. (1987). Substance abuse by young adult chronic patients.
Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 511 -514.
Schiffman, S. (1992). Relapse process and relapse prevention in addic-
tive behaviors. The Behavior Therapist, 15, 9-11.
Schneier, F. R., & Siris, S. G. (1987). A review of psychoactive substance
use and abuse in schizophrenia: Patterns of drug choice. Journal of
Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 641-650.
Schuckit, M. A. (1989). Drug and alcohol abuse (3rd ed.). New York:
Plenum Press.
Selzer, M. L. (1971). The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: The
quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychia-
try, 127, 1653-1658.
Sevy, S., Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & van Praag, H. M. (1990). Signifi-
856 K. MUESER, A. BELLACK, AND J. BLANCHARD
cance of cocaine history in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and
Mental Disease, 178, 642-648.
Siris, S. G, Kane, J. M, Frechen, K., Sellew, A. P., Mandeli, J., & Fra-
sano-Dube, B. (1988). Histories of substance abuse in patients with
postpsychotic depressions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29, 550-557.
Sobell, L. C, Toneatto, A., & Sobell, M. B. (1990). Behavior therapy. In
A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.). Handbook of comparative treat-
ments for adult disorders (pp. 479-505). New Vbrk: Wiley.
Solomon, P. (1986). Receipt of aftercare services by problem types:
Psychiatric, psychiatric/substance abuse and substance abuse. Psy-
chiatric Quarterly, 87,180-188.
Solomon, P., & Davis, J. M. (1986). The effects of alcohol abuse among
the new chronically mentally ill. Social Work in Health Care, 11,
65-74.
Soni, S. D, & Brownlee, M. (1991). Alcohol abuse in chronic schizo-
phrenics: Implications for management in the community. Acta Psy-
chialrica Scandinavica, 84, 272-276.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W, Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1990).
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-HI-RPatient edition
(SCID-P, Version 1.0). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Press.
Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1980). An alternative to mental hospital
treatment: Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical eval-
uation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392-397.
Tarter, R. E., & Edwards, K. L. (1985). Neuropsychology of alcohol-
ism. In R. E. Tarter & D. H. Van Thiel (Eds.), Alcohol and the brain:
Chronic effects (pp. 217-242). New York: Plenum Press.
Test, M. A, Wallisch, L. S., Allness, D. J., & Ripp, K. (1989). Substance
use in young adults with schizophrenic disorders. Schizophrenia
Bulletin, 15, 465-476.
Toland, A. M., & Moss, H. B. (1989). Identification of the alcoholic
schizophrenic: Use of clinical laboratory tests and the MAST. Jour-
nal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 49-53.
Tsuang, M. T, Simpson, J. C, & Kronfol, Z. (1982). Subtypes of drug
abuse with psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 141-147.
Tucker, J. A., & Sobell, L. C. (1992). Influences on help-seeking for
drinking problems and on natural recovery without treatment. The
Behavior Therapist, 15, 12-14.
Victor, M., & Hope, J. M. (1958). The phenomenon of auditory halluci-
nations in chronic alcoholism. Journal of Nervous and Mental Dis-
ease, 726,451-481.
Welti, C. V, & Fishbain, D. A. (1985). Cocaine-induced psychosis and
sudden death in recreational cocaine users. Journal of Forensic
Sciences, 30, 873-880.
Westermeyer, J. (1986). A clinical guide to alcohol and drug problems.
New York: Praeger.
Whitters, A. C., Cadoret, R. J., & Widmer, R. B. (1985). Factors asso-
ciated with suicide attempts in alcohol abusers. Journal of Affective
Disorders, 9, 19-23.
Wilkinson, D. A. (1985). Neuroradiologic investigations of alcohol-
ism. In R. E. Tarter & D. H. Van Thiel (Eds.), Alcohol and the brain:
Chronic effects (pp. 183-215). New York: Plenum Press.
Wilkinson, D. A. (1987). CT scan and neuropsychological assessments
of alcoholism. In O. A. Parsons, N. Butters, & P. E. Nathan (Eds.),
Neuropsychology of alcoholism: Implications for diagnosis and treat-
ment (pp. 76-102). New York: Guilford Press.
Received April 28,1992
Revision received May 4,1992
Accepted June 29,1992