Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V- 1523 -12
Key Words: Austenitic Stainless Steel, Density, Youngs Modulus, Poissons ratio, Ultrasonic wave
velocity, Lattice Parameter
Kljune rei: austenitni nerajui elik, gustina, Jungov modul, Poasonov odnos, brzina
ultrazvunog talasa, parametar reetke
Abstract
Various kinds of austenitic stainless steel have been used in oil refinery and chemical plant, and a
value of ultrasonic wave velocity is necessary for not only thickness measurement but also evaluation of
material deterioration. Although ultrasonic wave velocity depends generally on chemical composition,
material structure, grain size etc., it is hard to study the influence of all factors for calculating ultrasonic
wave velocity. Therefore, we noticed chemical composition of materials only.
Since ultrasonic wave velocity depends generally on parameter such as density , Youngs modulus E
and Poissons ratio , we calculated these parameters by using material data of respective elementary
substances. Then, we have investigated the relationship between the calculated values of ultrasonic
wave velocity and the experimental ones measured by ultrasonic testing.
Rezime
Razne vrste austenitnih nerajuih elika koriste se u u rafinerijama nafte i hemijskim postrojenjima, a
vrednost brzine ultrazvunog talasa je potrebna, ne samo za merenje debljine, ve i za ocenjivanje
propadanja materijala. Iako brzine ultrazvunog talasa uglavnom zavise od hemijskog sastava, strukture
materijala, veliine zrna itd, teko je prouavati uticaj svih faktora za izraunavanje brzine ultrazvunog
vala. Stoga smo razmatrali samo hemijski sastav materijala.
Dok brzina ultrazvunog talasa uglavnom zavisi od parametara, kao to su gustina, Jungov modul E i
Poasonov odnos , izraunali smo ove parametre pomou podataka za materijale od odgovarajuih
osnovnih supstanci. Zatim smo istraivali odnos izmeu izraunate vrednosti brzine ultrazvunog talasa
i eksperimentalno dobijenih ultrazvunim ispitivanjem.
1. Introduction
In measuring thickness of various kinds of austenitic stainless steels using in oil refinery and
chemical plant, it is hard to find out the velocity except for a typical type of stainless steel (for example,
AISI type 304 and 347) in a public handbook. Especially, an accurate value of longitudinal wave
velocity is necessary for thickness measurement by using ultrasonic pulse echo technique. Also, for
estimating deterioration of material, it is useful to examine a deviation in ultrasonic wave velocity such
as longitudinal or transverse wave velocity.
Longitudinal wave velocity CL and transverse wave velocity CS are given by the following
equations1) respectively
1
1. Uvod
Pri merenju debljine raznih vrsta austenitnog nerajueg elika koji se koriste u rafinerijama nafte i
hemijskim postrojenjima, teko je nai u raspoloeivim prirunicima brzinu, osim za tipine vrste
nerajueg elika (na primjer, AISI tip 304 i 347). Posebno, precizna vrednost brzine longitudinalnog
talasa je potrebna za merenje debljine pomou ultrazvune impuls -eho tehnike. Takoe, za procenu
pogoranje materijala, korisno je ispitati odstupanje brzine ultrazvunog talasa, kao to su brzine
longitudinalnog ili transverzalnog talasa.
Brzina longitudinalnog talasa CL i transverzalnog talasa CS date su jednainama1)
.
E (1 )
CL (1)
(1 )(1 2 )
E
CS (2)
2 (1 )
where E is Youngs modulus, is Poissons ratio and is density.
gde je E Jungov modul, Poasonov odnos i je gustina.
If parameters such as E, and can be estimated by using material data of respective elementary
substances of austenitic stainless steel, it will be possible to calculate ultrasonic wave velocity.
When measured longitudinal wave velocity CL (m/s) and transverse wave velocity CS (m/s), E (GPa),
and can be calculated as follows.
Ako se parametri kao to su E, i mogu se proceniti pomou podataka za materijale odgovarajuih
osnovnih supstanci austenitnog nerajueg elika, onda je mogue izraunati brzine ultrazvunog talasa.
Kada se meri brzina longitudinalnog talasa CL (m / s) i brzina transverzalnog talasa CS (m / s), E
(GPa), moe se izraunati kako sledi
CS2 (3C L2 4CS2 ) (3)
E
C L2 CS2
1 1
1 (4)
2 (C L / C S ) 1
2
In order to simulate a deviation in ultrasonic wave velocity, we set that one of these factors was
variable and others were constant.
Kako bi simulirali odstupanje u brzini ultrazvunog talasa, postavili smo da jedan od tih faktora varira
a ostali su bili konstantni.
Merili smo E, i od T.P. No.1-1 ~ 1-6 u tabeli 1, a ovi materijali su roba na tritu, i proizvedeni su
rastvarajuim tretmanom u skladu sa japanskim industrijskim standardima.
Podaci o drugim materijalima navedenim u tabeli 1 su na osnovu tih po H.M.Ledbetter 2) ~ 5), zato to je
mereno i E i nerajueg elika tipa AISI 304, 304L, 316 i 310S merenjem i C L i CS. Podaci za T.P.
No.1-1 ~ 1-6 u tabeli 1 pokazuju obe slike valjaonikih podataka koje izdaje proizvoa i rezultate
dobijene fluorescentnom analizom x-zracima (FXA). Ugljenik i sumpor u T.P.No.1-1 ~ 1-6 su
2
analizirani opremom za analizu ugljenika i sumpora istovremeno, jer je teko analiziranje ovih
elemenata pomou FXA.
Koristili smo valjaonike podatke , jer je razlika izmeu valjaonikih lista i FXA su zanemarljiva.
3. Experimental Method
3.1 Measurement of Lattice Parameter and Density
Lattice parameter d of T.P. No.1-1 1-6 were measured by X-ray diffraction method to investigate a
deviation in density coused by lattice parameter. Since the relation between cos 2 and d is represented
by a straight line, d was obtained by extrapolating to cos2 = 0 6), where is Bragg angle.
Density of T.P. No.1-1 1-6 was obtained by measuring the mass of the test piece in air and water
to compare experimental values with ones calculated by using d.
Densities of other materials were referred from the papers by H.M.Ledbetter2)5).
3. Eksperimentalna metoda
3.1 Merenje parametra reetke i gustine
Parametar reetke d za T.P. No.1-1 ~ 1-6 meren je metodom difrakcije x zraka radi istraivanja
odstupanja u gustini uzrokovanog parametrom reetke. S obzirom da je odnos izmeu cos 2 i d
predstavljen ravnom linijom, d je dobijen ekstrapolacijom do cos2 = 0 6), gde je Brag-ov ugao.
Gustina za T.P. No.1-1 ~ 1-6 je dobijena merenjem mase ispitnog komada u vazduhu i vodi radi
uporeenja eksperimentalnih vrednosti sa onima izraunatim preko d.
Gustine drugih materijala su uzete iz radova H.M.Ledbetter 2) ~ 5).
3.3 Ultrasonic Test Instrument and Size of Test Piece for Measuring Ultrasonic Wave Velocity
Table 2 shows ultrasonic instrument and probes for measuring longitudinal and transverse wave
velocity of T.P.No.1-1 1-6.
Size of test piece is shown in Table 3.
3.2 Merenje Jungovog modula i Poasonovog odnosa
I E i mereni su metodom merila naprezanja i ultrazvunom metodom.
3.3 Ultrazvuni ispitni instrument i veliina ispitnog komada za merenje brzine ultrazvunog talasa
Tabela 2 prikazuje ultrazvuni instrument i sonde za merenje brzine longitudinalnih i transverzalnih
talasa za T.P.No.1-1 ~ 1-6.
Veliina ispitnog komada prikazana je u tabeli 3.
Table 2:Ultrasonic test instrument and probes
Tabela 2: Ultrazvuni ispitni instrument i sonde
Ultrasonic test Model USN 58L,
instrument GE Inspection Technology, Inc.
Probe for Model V109 (5MHz)
longitudinal wave Panametrics-NDT, Inc.
Probe for Model 5Z10X10N-S,
shear wave Japan Probe Co, Ltd.
Table 3: Size of test piece
Tabela 3: Veliina ispitnog komada
T.P. No. AISI No. Size (mm)
1-1 1-4 304, 304L l 200w 50t 15
1-5 1-6 310S, 316 l 200w 50t 9
4
to that in BCC, Eq. (5) was used for estimating d (nm) based on paper8).
d = 0.3555+0.0045C0.000035Si0.00010P +0.000067Mn+0.00007Ni+0.000055Cr (5)
Density (kg/m3) was calculated by Eq. (6)9),
n
A 4
3 i i
Mc ) (6)
( Ma
Nd i 1 1 A
where N is Avogadro constant 6.021023 , d is lattice parameter, Mi is atomic weight except
carbon, ai is atomic fraction except carbon, A is atomic fraction of carbon, and Mc is atomic weight of
carbon.
0.364
Lattice constant, d (nm)
d = 0.045C + 0.3555
0.362
0.360
0.275
0.358
Since S.Nishikawa10) reported that Youngs modulus of solid-solution type alloy in two component
system was roughly proportional to each atomic percent, we assumed that Youngs modulus in
pluralistic component system would be given by Eq. (7):
n
E ai Ei (7)
i
where, ai is
1 atomic fraction and Ei is Youngs modulus of an elementary substance
S obzirom da je S.Nishikawa 10) saoptio da je Jungov modul kod dvokomponentnih legura tipa
5
vrstog rastvora, priblino proporcionalan svakom atomskom procentu, pretpostavili smo da je Jungov
modul u pluralistikom sistemu komponenta dat izrazom. (7):
n
E ai Ei (7)
gde je i 1 ai atomska frakcija i Ei je Jungov modul elementarne supstance.
Similarly, we assumed that in pluralistic component system would be given by Eq. (8):
n
ai i (8)
where i 1i is Poissons ratio of an elementary substance.
Isto tako, pretpostavili smo da u pluralistikom sistemu komponenta bilo dato izrazom. (8):
n
ai i (8)
i 1
gdje i Poasonov odnos osnovne supstance
The atomic fraction ai was calculated using weight fraction and atomic weight.
Both E and M of the respective elementary substances are listed in Table 4.
CL was calculated by substituting values in Eq. (6), (7) and (8) into Eq. (1). Similarly, CS was
calculated by substituting values in Eq. (6), (7) and (8) into Eq. (2).
1/ 2 1/ 2
C L E ( 2 ) (10
3
(1 )(1 ) (1 2 ) )
3
6
1/ 2
CS 2 1 (12
E ( 1 / 2)
E 4 (1 ) )
Partial differentiation of Eq. (2) with regard to gives Eq. (13).
Delimina diferencijacija jedn. (2) u odnosu na daje jedn.. (13).
1/ 2
CS 2 E
(1 ) ( 3 / 2) (13
4 )
Partial differentiation of Eq. (2) with regard to density gives Eq. (14).
Delimina diferencijacija jedn. (2) u odnosu na daje jedn.. (14).
1/ 2
CS 2 E (14
( 3 / 2)
4 (1 ) )
Moreover, Eq. (6) was partially differentiated with respect to d to simulate a deviation in coused by a
deviation in d and Eq. (15) can be given.
ta vie, jedn. (6) je delimino difrencirana u odnosu na d da bi simulirali odstupanje uzrokovano
odstupanjem d i moe se dati jedn. (15)
12 n
A
d
Nd 4
M i ai 1 A Mc (15
i 1 )
4. Results and Discussions
4. Rezultati i diskusija
4.1 Acoustic Anisotropy Concerning Transverse Wave Velocity Ratio
4.1 Akustina anizotropija u odnosu na odnos brzina transverzalnog talasa
Table 5 shows the measured values of transverse wave velocity ratio. Since transverse wave velocity
ratio of T.P.No.1-1 1-6 is very small, it is evident that acoustic anisotropy for these materials is not
observed.
Tabela 5 prikazuje izmerene vrednosti odnos brzine transverzalnog talasa. S obzirom da je odnos
brzine transverzalnog talasa za T.P.No.1-1 ~ 1-6 je vrlo mali, evidentno je da nije utvrena akustina
anizotropija za ove materijale.
Table 4 Reference data of Youngs modulus, Poissons ratio and atomic weight of elementary substance
Tabela 4 Referentni podaci o Jungovom modulu, Poasonovog odnosa i atomske mase elementarnih
supstanci
7
concentration of Ni and Cr were almost the same.
Error between E measured by ultrasonic testing and one by strain gauge method, was in a range of
approximately -2 3 % as shown in Table 4.
Error between measured by ultrasonic testing and one by strain gauge method was in a range of
approximately -5 5 %.
E and measured by ultrasonic testing were compared with the calculated ones.
Tabela 6 prikazuje izmerene vrednosti , E i za T.P. No.1-1 ~ 1-6.
Uoeno je da se, kod AISI 304 tipa nerajueg elika (TPNo.1-1 ~ 1-3) i tip 304L nehrajueg elika
(TPNo.1-4) neznatno smanjio s poveanjem sadraja ugljenika, iako su koncentracija Ni i Cr bili gotovo
isti.
Greka izmeu izemerenog E ultrazvunim ispitivanjem i metodom meraa naprezanja, bila je u
rasponu od oko -2 ~ 3% kao to je prikazano u tabeli 4.
Greka izmeu izmerenih ultrazvunim ispitivanjem i metodom meraa naprezanja je u rasponu od
oko -5 ~ 5%.
E i izmerene ultrazvuno ispitivanjem su uporeene u odnosu na izraunate vrednosti.
0.370
Lattice parameter
Experimental value (nm)
0.360
+0.7%
0.350
T.P.1-1 1-4
T.P.1-5
T.P.1-6
0.340
Fig. 2 Relation
8300 between
0.340 0.350 experimental
0.360 values and calculated ones of lattice parameter
0.370
Density
Sl. 2: Odnos izmeu eksperimentalnih i izraunatih vrednosti parametra reetke
Experimental value (kg/m )
T
.
P. N
o
.
3
8200
8100
1
-
1
1
- 1
-
4
5
6
2
- 2
-
9
8000
7900 -2.2%
3
1
4
-
5
- 3
1
0
4
-
6
1
5-23
7800
8
7700
7700 7900 8100 8300 8500
3
Calculated value (kg/m )
Fig. 3 Relation between experimental values and calculated ones of density
Sl. 3: Odnos izmeu eksperimentalnih i izraunatih vrednosti gustine
215
Experimental value (GPa)
Young's modulus
T
1
.
P
-
1
.N
o
1
-
4.
205
1-5
6
195
185
2
3
4
-
1
-
2
-
9
3
1
4
-
60
5-1
5-2
175
-5.7%
3
165
Fig.165 175 185between
4 Relation 195 205 215 225 235
experimental 245and calculated ones of Youngs modulus
values
Calculated value (GPa)
Sl. 4. Odnos izmeu eksperimentalnih i izraunatih vrednosti za Jungov modul
9
Sl. 5 prikazuje odnos izmeu eksperimentalnih i izraunatih vrednosti za . Izraunate vrednosti su
gotovo konstantne, i bile su nezavisne od eksperimentalnih. inilo se da margina greke uzrokovana
nedostatkom podataka za Poasonov odnos nemetalnih elemenata kao to su ugljenik, fosfor i sumpor.
0.32
Poisson's ratio
T
1
.
P
-
1
.N
o
1
-
4.
0.31
Experimental value
+7.0%
1-5
6
0.30
0.29 -5.2%
2
3
4
-
1
-
2
-
9
3
1
4
-
60
5-1
5-2
0.28
3
0.27
0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.34
Fig. 5 Relation between experimental values and
calculated ones of Poissons ratio
Calculated value
Sl. 5. Odnos izmeu eksperimentalnih i izraunatih vrednosti Poasonovog odnosa
T
.
P. N
o
.
wave velocity
Experimental value (m/s)
1
-
1 1
-
4
5900
5800
1
2
--
5
6
2
-
9
(a) Longitudinal wave velocity 5700 -2.1%
3
1
4
-
5
- 3
1
0
4
-
6
1
5-23
(a) Brzina longitudinalnog talasa
5600
5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 6100 6200
3250 Calculated value (m/s)
Transverse
T
.
P. N
o
.
3200 wave velocity
Experimental value (m/s)
3150
1
-
1
1- 1
-
4
5
6
2
-
2
-
9
+0.2%
3
1 3
1
0
3100
4
-
4
-
6
-4.9%
5- 1
-2.2%
10
3050
5-23
3000
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350
Calculated value (m/s)
(b) Transverse wave velocity
(b) Brzina transverzalnog talasa
Fig. 6 Relation between experimental values and calculated ones of ultrasonic wave velocity
Sl.6. Odnos izmeu eksperimentalnih i izraunatih vrednosti brzine ultrazvunog talasa
7500
Deviation in CL
7000
6500
6000
5500
Density
5000 Young's modulus
Poisson's ratio
4500
-20 -10 0 10 20
Fig. 7 Relation between longitudinal wave velocity and ratio of deviation in factor of Eq. (1)
Ratio ofizmeu
Sl. 7. Odnos deviation to calculated
brzine value (%) talasa i odnos odstupanja faktora jedn. (1)
longitudinalnog
11
Sl. 8 prikazuje odnos izmeu CS i odnos odstupanja svakog parametra , E i u jednaini. (2) od
izraunatih vrednosti prema jedn. (2). Na sl. 8, CS je smanjen sa poveanjem odstupanja i , a raste sa
poveanjem E, jer jed. (2) pokazuje da je brzina transverzalnog talasa proporcionalna kvadratnom
korenu iz E / .
Uporeujui krivu CS sa CL, odstupanje CS je definitivno manje nego CL, jer 1 / (2 (1 + ))u
jednaini. (2) je manje od (1-) / ((1 + ) (1-2))u jednaini. (1). Na primer, kada je = 0.288
(eksperimentalna vrednost u tabeli 5) za TPNo.1-1, 1 / (2 (1 + )) je 0.62 i (1-) / ((1+ )
(1-2)) je 1.14.
4000
Deviation in CS
Transverse wave velocity (m/s)
3500
3000
2500 Density
Young'smodulus
Poisson's ratio
2000
-20 -10 0 10 20
Fig. 8 Relation between transverse wave velocity and ratio of deviation of parameter , E and in Eq.(2)
Ratio of deviation to calculated value (%)
to calculated value
Sl. 8. Odnos izmeu brzine transverzalnog talasa i odnosa odstupanja parametara , E i ujedn. (2) za
izraunate vrednosti
18000
Deviation in
Calculated density (kg/m )
3
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
-20 between
Fig. 9 Relation -10 density 0 and 10 ratio of20deviation to lattice parameter calculated
Ratio of deviation to lattice
Sl. 9. Odnos izmeu gustine i odnosa izraunatog odstupanja parametra reetke
parameter calculated (%)
12
Partial differentiation of
density (kg/m )
3
0.0E+00
-4.0E+13
-8.0E+13
-1.2E+14
-1.6E+14
-20 -15 -10 -5
Deviation in
d 0 5 10 15 20
L
-2.0E+14
Fig.10 Relation between /d and ratio of deviation to d
C
Ratio of deviation to lattice
C
Sl.10. Odnos izmeu /d i odnos odstupanja d
parameter calculated (%)
4.4.5 Deviation in partial differentiation of C/ with regard to density
4.4.5 Odstupanje parcijalne diferencijacije C / s obzirom na gustinu
S
Fig. 11 shows the relation between C/ and the ratio of a deviation to . In this figure, zero at
horizontal axis represents that a deviation in of experimental value shown in Table 5 is zero. In Fig. 11,
C/ of CL increased moderately with the increase in the ratio of a deviation to . On the other hand,
C/ of CS increased slightly with the increase in the ratio of a deviation to .
Sl. 11 pokazuje odnos izmeu C / i odnos odstupanja .. Na ovoj slici, nula na horizontalnoj osi
predstavlja odstupanje eksperimentalnih vrednosti prikazano u tabeli 5 koje iznosi nula. Na Sl. 11,
C / CL raste umereno sa poveanjem odnosa odstupanja . S druge strane, C / CS se blago
poveava sa poveanjem odnosa odstupanja .
-20 -10 0 10 20
0.0
Partial differentiation of
Deviation in and
-0.1
( /)
-0.2
density C
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
C
L
L ongitudinal wave velocity
-0.6
Transverse wave velocity
-0.7
C
Ratio of deviation to density calculated (%)
Fig.11 Relation between C/ and ratio of deviation to
EE
Sl.11. Odnos C / i odnos odstupanja
S
4.4.6 Odstupanje parcijalne diferencijacije C / E s obzirom na Jungov modul
Fig. 12 shows the relation between C/E and the ratio of a deviation in E to the calculated value.
Since C/E in Fig. 12 decreased with the increase in the ratio of deviation to E, the increment of CL
in Fig. 7 and that of CS in Fig. 8 decreased gradually.
In Fig. 12 the decrement of CL/E was larger than that of CS/E.
Sl. 12 pokazuje odnos izmeu C / E i odnos odstupanja E prema izraunatim vrednostima.
S obzirom da je C / E na sl. 12 smanjeno sa poveanjem odnosa odstupanja do E, prirast C L na sl. 7
i dok CS sa sl. 8 se postupno se smanjuje.
Na sl. 12 opadanje CL / E je vee nego CS / E.
20
Young's modulus ( C /E )
Deviation in and
16
Partial differentiation of
12
2.5E+04
Deviation in and
2.0E+04
1.5E+04
1.0E+04
Partial differentiation of
5.0E+03
0.0E+00
-5.0E+03 L ongitudinal wave velocity
Transverse wave velocity
-1.0E+04
-20 -10 0 10 20
Fig.13 Relation betweenRatio
C/ and ratio
of deviation to of deviation
calculated (%) to
Sl.13. Odnos C / i odnos odstupanja
5. Conclusions
5. Zakljuci
(1) In calculating both lattice parameter and density by using chemical composition of material used, the
calculated values were within an allowable margin of error, when assuming a few percent of error
can be allowed, based on our experience. However, the calculated values of Youngs modulus and
Poissons ratio were beyond an allowable margin of error, because it was impossible to find out data
of elementary substance.
(2) Acoustic anisotropy concerning transverse wave velocity ratio of T.P. No.1-1 1-6 was not
observed.
(3) The calculated value of longitudinal wave velocity were within an allowable margin of error.
Similarly, the calculated values of transverse wave velocity except AISI type 310S stainless steel
were within an allowable margin of error.
(4) The calculated value of density was gradually decreased with the increase in the ratio of a deviation
in lattice parameter.
(5) Longitudinal wave velocity increased with the increase in a deviation of Poissons ratio, and was in
proportion to a square root of E/.
(6) Transverse wave velocity decreased with the increase in a deviation of Poissons ratio, and was in
proportion to a square root of E/.
(7) The deviation in longitudinal wave velocity due to the deviation of each parameters in Eqs. (1) and
(2) was considerably larger than that in transverse wave velocity.
1) Pri izraunavanju i reetke parametara i gustine, koristei hemijski sastav materijala, izraunate
vrednosti su bile unutar dozvoljenih margina greke, kada je pretpostavljeno da nekoliko procenata
greke moe biti dozvoljeno, na osnovu naeg iskustva. Meutim, izraunate vrednosti Jungovog
modula i Poasonovog odnosa su bili van dozvoljene margine greke, jer je bilo nemogue saznati
14
podatke osnovne supstance.
(2) Akustina anizotropija vezana za odnos brzina transverzalnog talasa za T.P. No.1-1 ~ 1-6 nije
uoena.
(3) Izraunata vrednost brzine longitudinalnog talasa su unutar dozvoljenih margina greke. Slino
tome, izraunate vrednosti brzina transverzalnog talasa, osim za AISI tip 310S nerajueg elika su
unutar dozvoljenih margina greke.
(4) Izraunata vrednost gustine je postepeno smanjena sa porastom odnosa odstupanja parametara
reetke.
(5) Uzduno brzina vala poveala s poveanjem odstupanje od Poissonov omjer, i bio je u odnosu na
kvadratni korijen od E / .
(6) Brzina transverzalnog talasa se smanjuje s poveanjem odstupanja Poasonovog odnosa, i
proporcionalan je kvadratnom korenu iz E / .
(7) Odstupanje brzine transverzalnog talasa zbog odstupanja svakog parametara u jednainama. (1) i (2)
bio je znatno vei nego kod brzine transverzalnog talasa.
References
Literatura
1) Handbook for Non-destructive Inspection (New Version), Edited by The Japanese Society for Non-
Destructive Inspection. Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun (1992), p.1283
2) H.M.Ledbetter, H.W.Austin Effect of Carbon and Nitrogen on the Elastic Constants of AISI
Type 304 Stainless Steel, Materials Science and Engineering, 70(1985), p.143-149.
3) H.M.Ledbetter Manganese contributions on the elastic constants of face centred cubic Fe-Cr-Ni
stainless steel, JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 20(1985), p.2923-2929.
4) H.M.Ledbetter, S.A.Kim, J.Mater Molybdenum effect on Fe-Cr-Ni alloy elastic constants,
Res.3(1),
Jan/Feb (1988), p.40-44.
5) H.M.Ledbetter Sound velocities and elastic constants of steels 304, 310, and 316, Metal
Science, December (1980), p.595-596.
6) Handbook of X-ray Diffraction, Rigaku, (2000), p.72-78
7) Material Data Book, Institute of Metallurgy in Japan, Maruzen, (2004), p.31, p.44.
8) W.C.Leslie Iron and Its Dilute Substitutional Solid Solutions. MATALLURGICAL
TRANSACTIONS. Vol.3, January (1972), p.5-26.
9) S.Nishikawa Introduction of Material Engineering, Agne Gijutu Center (2001)p.92-96,
10) S.Nishikawa Introduction of Material Engineering, Agne Gijutu Center (2001)p.122,
11) S.Kohara Introduction of Metaragical Science, Asakura Shoten (2000), p.280-281.
12) Werner Kster H.Franz. et al. POISSONS RATIO FOR METALS AND ALLOYS.
METALLURGICAL REVIEWS. (1961), No.21, Vol.6, p.18-19.
13) R.M.German Science of Powder Metallurgy, Uchida Rokakuho (1996), p.524-529.
15