WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

Legal Conspiracy?

The Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword

What’s left after the lawyers have had their way with us?

A couple of years ago I set out to evict my former Tenant and stumbled into a most ingenious highly
complicated conspiracy which was bourn of legitimate reasoning.

What I thought would be a relatively simple Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to evict my
former tenant for arrears of rent and failing to vacate my premises on May 31 2005 as he had signed
an agreement to do so evolved into a major fraud perpetrated by my tenant.

From there during my attempt to find a responsible government department to commence or cause to
commence proceedings it became clear to me when nobody would cooperate that there was much
more going on here than meets the eye.

At first there was tampering with the evidence by the ORHT and the Investigation and Enforcement
Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing which refused to investigate and refused to
respond in writing at first but I remained persistent and after a month I finally got a response from
Dave Grech Coordinator of Investigations whose explanation of why the department wouldn’t
investigate was absolutely ridiculous.

After sending many more letters and even driving down to his office one time and when he was not
available to see me I left copies of the evidence that I had presented to the Tribunal and a disk
recording of the hearing with Roal Pascual of his office who promised to deliver to Dave but he never
responded even after a few more letters to him.

It made no sense, either did the fact that there was information missing on the disk the Tribunal
prepared for me of the first day of the hearing June 30 2005 which took them 3 weeks to get ready.
At the beginning of the 2nd day of the hearing July 28 2005 Nancy Fahlgren the judicator announced
there would not be a recorder which I didn’t give too much of a thought at the time but after the
ridiculous response by Dave Grech and the difficulty of getting it in writing it became a significant
factor causing me to conclude there was something a whole lot more gone on.

After a couple of meetings with staff of the York Regional Police they concluded that they would not
investigate but the people I met with said they would not be writing me as to the conclusion of their
response.

I finally received a response from Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge who explained their reason for not
investigating which I was not satisfied with.
I drove down to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police building south of Davis Drive on Harry Walker
Boulevard in Newmarket and gave Inspector Goulet a binder folder of the evidence and
correspondence and eventually received a report from Michael Thomson of the commercial fraud
investigations who declined to investigate.
I wrote many government personnel at this point including my MPP Julia Munro, who directed me to
the Ombudsman who I had already corresponded with to no avail, the Premier Dalton McGuinty who
suggested I contact the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Hon. John Gerretsen and the
Attorney General Michael Bryant whose office responded stating they do not get involved in person
cases.

On September 1 2006 I sent a 271 page letter to the Premier which contained all the responses I had
to date from various departments and it included a couple of other serious matters.
One involving the Mayor of the City of Toronto cover up of 19 documents I delivered to his office
dealing with the waste of tax payers money and corruption and the other was to do with the Upper
Canada Law Society dealing with the Ethical standards of a lawyer.

This brought to my attention the unethical practice of the Law Society.

It was becoming quite clear that the Society and the Government were far from ethical but I still
couldn’t get a handle on things.

I know everyone has their suspicions of the ethical practices of lawyers and politicians but you need a
whole lot more than just suspicions and who are you going to take the facts to anyway?

I sent the Hon. John Gerretsen a copy of the 271 page letter addressed to the Premier dates September
1 2006 which I named the BLACK BOOK but he declined to commence or cause to commence
proceedings because he trusted Dave Grech.
It was his duty to monitor compliance with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997

I sent Dave Grech a copy of the BLACK BOOK as well as Attorney General Michael Bryant,, MPP
Julia Munro, Ted Arkell Ombudsman, Bruce Herridge, YRP, MP Peter Van Loan and Michael
Thomson, RCMP
See http://groups.google.com/group/black-book

I downloaded the Constitution Act, 1982 because I was fairly sure they were all tramping over my
Charter rights.

On perusing the Act I concluded they sure were not acting in the Spirit of the Constitution.

I wrote them all a prodigious amount of letters with accompanying evidence but they all refused to
respond to my concerns which is absolutely ridiculous considering the purported guaranteed Charter
rights we individuals are supposed to have.
I downloaded the “Role of the Attorney General” from his web site and a conspiracy angle began to
take shape.

From this information it became readily apparent that the Attorney General wears too many hats in as
much as he is the chief law officer.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that most
elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to
easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary
measures and safeguards personal liberties.

I got to thinking about the connection with the “the rule of law” in the first line of the Charter rights.
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
Why was the elusive concept-the rule of law- which is a well established legal principle, but hard to
easily define (known only to professionals) chosen to support the guarantee of the individual’s
Charter rights.

It was the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole up until the enactment of the
Constitution Act, 1982 and the inclusion of the Charter rights obviously indicated that the rule of law
that protects individual’s, and society as a whole to date was inadequate thereby necessitating the
specific inclusion of the guarantee of the individual’s Charter rights which would require a
completely new approach to protecting them in particular as defined in

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.

As I perused the “Role of the Attorney General” over and over again the conspiracy angle
became clearer and clearer.

Here we have the Attorney General in very responsible positions with the various legal sectors of
government where he is highly influential or highly influenced by the upper echelon of society
and he is responsible for the protection of the peasants purported to be guaranteed rights.

That explains well why my guaranteed rights have not been protected and to remove any
thought that it may have been due to oversight having so many responsibilities and all,you can
forget it because I have proliferated his office with the evidence that my rights have not been
protected and I have no reason to believe any other individual’s rights would be protected by his
office.

The fact is the various government offices that responded to me cited various laws and acts
which allowed them to close my files leaving a fraud artist wandering the streets with me a
victim having not seen any sign of justice.

The modus operandi of the Ontario Government is well documented in my writings and it is clear
that it is incapable of backing the individuals Charter rights.

By this time I had been informed by the OPP that the YRP had jurisdiction regarding my
concerns and since they refused to respond to my writings since Karen Knoakes of the standards
complaints department of the YRP declined to commence or cause to commence proceedings I
took my evidence to the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services on November 15 2006
but they determined the YRP were not out of line by refusing to investigate.

The day before November 14 2006 I had driven up to Orillia to the OPP Anti- Rackets where I
met Randy Craig Detective Sergeant who heard me out for about an hour but declined to
commence proceedings.

I then decided to assemble the evidence in digested form with all the ducks in a row to take to a
lawyer which I have not been able to find one to date.

I called these the 15 Lawyer Files and I distributed them to all the people previously mentioned
and referred to within them which included a couple of files, Lawyer Files 13 and 13A addressed
to the Newmarket and a Toronto Crown Attorney.
Nobody responded to these 15 Lawyer Files.

I should note that I also sent them a 73 page document addressed to the Toronto Sun dated
October 8 2006 which contained my version of the Tribunal hearing along with copies of the
documents I had presented to the Tribunal.

The evidence in this document is irrefutable as to the crimes my former tenant had committed
right there before the judicator in a public building financed by the people to dispense justice to
and for the people of Ontario.

Upon reading the evidence it is immediately apparent that the responses of those who declined
to commence proceedings were absurd.

I sent my 15 Lawyer Files and the 73 page Toronto Sun letter to over 100 senators but not one
as responded.

I have also sent Julian Fantino OPP Commissioner the evidence but his office responded that
they would not be investigating.

I wrote Prime Minister Stephen Harper thinking he might be interested considering the fact he
enacted the Federal Accountability Act but alas I was wrong as I actually suspected.

The way I see it there should be no need for the Accountability Act because they have all been
financed to perform a duty under the auspices of the Constitution Act, 1982 and it is absolutely
ridiculous that irresponsible people would be hired to do it.