Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English 102
5/8/17
On September 25th, 1789, the Bill of Rights was written, since then many amendments
have been ratified to adjust with the times. The abolishment of slavery as well as womens rights
to vote are both examples of productive change in the United States. However, in modern day
America the second amendment has become more detrimental than beneficial, and it needs to be
repealed. The second amendment states: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security
of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Since the
birth of this nation the Bill of Rights has been a topic of controversy; in recent years, the second
amendment has made headlines regarding acts of terrorism, mass murders, and unfortunately
school shootings. It is because of these reasons that the availability of guns needs to be
To begin, the right to bear arms can be interpreted as guns, or weapons in general; in this
case firearms are the more prominent issue. Back in the 1930s carrying a gun in public was
common, and it was almost always done openly; todays society is the complete opposite in
approach (Pickert, 2014). Firearms can be separated into a variety of categories however, in the
United States most of the weapons used are assault rifles, pistols, and submachine guns; which
all fall into the group of small arms. The accessibility of purchasing a firearm is frightening,
quite simply for the fact that several gun sellers do not require a background check. This
convenience may portray a positive light for selling guns to family or friends but, ultimately
there is always a risk that a gun could fall into the hands of someone with malevolent intent. One
example for this is the various gangs spread between both coasts, luring young members to
A person could imagine the look displayed by the founding fathers if they saw what their
country had become. The second amendment was devised to ensure the protection of the
American people, today that same design is killing them. The technology of guns, cannons, and
rockets have evolved all throughout the history of the United States for military reasons. During
a state of war, when the enemy has superior fire power, the military responds by increasing the
number of weapons to gain a tactical advantage. As the world becomes increasingly more
technologically advanced, so does guns and their lethalness. Guns have led to the deaths of
children shooting their playmates, road rage shootings, and those caught in the cross fire;
repealing the second amendment would ensure none of these horrific events could occur.
There has been much controversy over the abolishment of the second amendment, each
voice expressing their opinion on the matter. One of which is a professor of law, James Lindgren
at Northwestern University who wrote an article, Forward: The past and Future of Guns, for the
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Lindgren argues that, On historical issues, I agree
with the gun rights crowd that in the Second Amendment the Framers recognized an individual
right to own guns. On policy issues, however, I tend to believe that some forms of gun control
probably save more lives than they cost, but unfortunately the net effects are probably not that
large one way or the other. As a professor of law, keeping in mind the countless hours dedicated
to his profession, Lindgren does make a valid point that some forms of gun control could save
more lives (Lindgren, 2015). Lindgren supports his view by adding the 2004 National
Academies National Research Councils data, There is no credible evidence that right-to-
carry laws either decrease or increase violent crime; research has found associations between
gun availability and suicide with guns, but it does not show whether such associations reveal
genuine patterns of cause and effect. To acquire a better view of the situation, In 2012, there
were 500 murders in Chicago, more than New York City (419) or Los Angeles (299), In Illinois,
86% of homicides were with guns, the highest percentage in the nation; in the United States
overall, 69% homicides involved guns. (Lindgren, 2015). These deaths could have been
In Lindgrens article, he tackled the issue with a dualistic view on how guns
affect modern America, many do not share his same beliefs. In fact, many Americans are on the
willing to make guns safer. The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) conducted a two
part survey, the US Publics Preference for Safer Guns, with Julia Wolfson at the helm. Julia
Wolfson, an assistant professor for nutritional sciences concluded, Overall, we found that 59%
of Americans, if they were to purchase a new handgun, were willing to buy a childproof gun,
23% were undecided, and 18% were unwilling to buy a child- proof gun thats more than half of
America (Wolfson, 2016). This data proves that majority of Americans are still willing to
purchase guns, and just because an idea is followed by many, that does not mean it is the correct
choice. During the second survey the AJPH found, Among gun owning Americans, 43% were
willing to purchase a childproof gun and 33% were undecided. Almost two thirds of nongun-
owning Americans (65% of those with guns in their households, and 63% of those in nongun
households) expressed willing- ness to purchase childproof guns. Interest in childproof guns was
highest among politically liberal Americans (71%), but was also high among political moderates
(56%) and conservatives (56%). People with children younger than 18 years at home were more
interested in purchasing childproof guns than those without children at home (65% versus 56%)
(Wolfson, 2016). As shown above, many liberals wish that guns were childproofed, whereas
moderates and conservatives were not as willing, leaving themselves on the fence.
Since the 2017 election, instead of reforming the second amendment some desire that the
country make a national concealed carry law. John Boch, a co-chair of President Trump Second
Amendment Coalition states during an interview with National Public Radio (NPR), As it is
currently in America, there's a patchwork of laws across the land and you have to do a lot of
research ahead of time to make sure that you're legal if you're carrying your concealed firearm
across state lines. If we had national reciprocity, our concealed carry licenses would be
recognized with full faith and credit just as our driver's licenses are to current Americas. And so,
we want to see that expanded to the concealed carry licenses as well across the nation so I can go
to New York City or to Los Angeles and not have to do a mountain of research and maybe find
out that my carry license is not recognized in one state versus another (Under, 2017). A national
concealed carry law could have dire consequences. For instance, between the years 2006 and
2007 a total of 25,423 firearm homicides and 34,235 firearm suicides happened among US
residents, among those suicides were youths aged 10-19 years (Kegler, 2011). Those such as
Boch may argue that defense is the only reason for having a concealed weapon. Once again, if
there are no guns in the US, then defending oneself with a gun against a gunman would no
longer be an issue.
The largest issue by far with the second amendment regarding guns in American culture
is school shootings. School shootings have become an annual situation in the United States.
There are many who believe the answer is arming the teachers to defend the students if a gunman
makes it onto campus. Allen Rostron, wrote an article, School Shootings and the Legislative
Push to Arm Teachers, on the second amendment within the school setting. Inside the article a
multitude of infamous school shootings were mentioned such as in 1999 at Columbine High
School 12 students and a teacher were killed, in 2007 at Virginia Tech five faculty members and
27 students were murdered, and most upsetting in 2012 at Sandy Hook Elementary School 20
first graders and six adults were killed (Rostron, 2014). Each death was a person who had a
These shootings have developed attention in the media, causing people to deliberate if
arming teachers may be a safe choice. The National Rifle Association (NRA) proposed that every
school should be guarded by armed officers. The NRA put the Honorable Congressman Asa
Hutchinson to lead the effort, whether theyre retired police, retired military or rescue
personnel, I think there are people in every community in this country, who would be happy to
serve, if only someone asked them and gave them the training and certification to do so (Rostron,
2014). The NRAs proposal demonstrates their inability respond properly to violence, violence
cannot be solved with more violence. One of the consequences would be the death of a student, a
parent, or even the faculty if they were in the wrong place at the wrong time, ultimately getting
The safety of students in schools should be one of the top priorities in the US yet its not,
and weapons still make it onto school grounds. The children have a somber view; they are
frightened during school hours; armed officers will only increase that fear. Feeling unsafe can
cause stress which increases a childs production of the stress hormone, cortisol. Long lasting
effects can occur from prolonged stress. some that are associated with mood disorders like major
depressive disorder, or anxiety disorders. In response to this Carol Riordan, wrote Making
School Safe, an article for Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, in which she addressed
the environments children are in these days. She incorporated the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDCP) national survey on what children perceive while enrolled in class
between the grades nine through 12, Twelve percent reported being in a physical fight on school
property in the year prior to the survey. Nearly 6 percent reported they did not go to school on
one or more days in the month before the survey because they felt unsafe at school or on their
way to and from school (Riordan, 2014). The second amendment could negatively impact
children to a further degree if a national conceal carry law comes to fruition; making that 6
percent a fond memory. Among those in the national survey 5 percent of children enrolled at
school reported they carried a weapon, this is the problem at hand. If a child can get ahold of a
Schools are not the only places affected, there has been shootings across America
stemming from terroristic motivation, mental illness, and mass murder. In Aurora Colorado in
July of 2012, there was a shooting inside of a movie theater causing Americans, and even the
president himself to ponder if the second amendment was doing more harm than good. President
Obama mentioned in a statement, But we Americans are not inherently a more violent people
than folks are in other countries. Were not inherently prone to mental health problems. The main
difference that sets our nation apart, what makes us so susceptible to so many mass shootings is
that we dont do enough, we dont take the basic common sense actions to keep guns out of the
hands of criminals and dangerous people. Whats different about America is its easy to get your
hands on a gun (Keehn, 2015). Obama would continue to voice his pro-gun control until the end
On the flip side, instead of abolishing the second amendment, national concealed carry
could become legal, the NRA as well as gun right advocates would have completed their desire,
and may or may not stop advocating. Gangs would use the law for their own motives, murderers
would become systematic in their ability to kill. The days of school shootings would become a
lighter memory compared to the bloodshed that would occur the days following the legalization.
Children would be hidden away by their parents in order to keep them safe, truly a dystopian
society.
There are many different solutions the United States can use to answer problem, doing
nothing, making national concealed carry legal, taking away the second amendment right
entirely, and reform the amendment to regulate the availability of firearms. These are four
different major options and each come at a different price. By repealing the second amendment
the country would have a chance to work together for a better future, one that the founding
fathers would be proud of. Both gun reformists and gun rights activists would eventually see the
positive outcome of a nation without guns. The nation would become safer, and people will no
longer walk in fear with the thought of being harmed on the streets.
Lastly, the United States is no longer at war with an oppressive country trying to devise a
revolution. Times have changed since then, the reasons to own a gun are no longer, the military
force has enough to keep the US safe from any occupying country or incoming attack. It is
because of these reasons; the second amendment should be repealed to ensure a safer and
Blocher, Joseph and Darrell A. H. Miller. "What Is Gun Control? Direct Burdens, Incidental
Burdens, and the Boundaries of the Second Amendment." University of Chicago Law
search.ebscohost.com.montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=bth&AN=114160392&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Keehn, Gabriel and Deron Boyles. "Sense, Nonsense, and Violence: Levinas and the Internal
Logic of School Shootings." Educational Theory, vol. 65, no. 4, Aug. 2015, pp. 441-458.
EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/edth.12126.
Kegler, S. R., Annest, J. L., Kresnow, M., & Mercy, J. A. (2011). Violence-related firearm deaths
Lindgren, James. "Forward: The past and Future of Guns." Journal of Criminal Law &
search.ebscohost.com.montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=f5h&AN=112464434&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Pickert, Kate. "Armed America." Time, vol. 184, no. 12, 29 Sept. 2014, p. 28. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com.montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=ulh&AN=98381900&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Riordan, Carol Ann. "Making School Safe." Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, vol.
search.ebscohost.com.montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=f5h&AN=98641784&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Rostron, Allen. "School Shootings and the Legislative Push to Arm Teachers." University of
Toledo Law Review, vol. 45, no. 3, Spring2014, pp. 439-455. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com.montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=a9h&AN=97359002&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Under Trump, A 2nd Amendment Coalition Looks To Push National Concealed-Carry Law."
montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/login?
url=http://go.galegroup.com.montgomerycollege.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?
p=LitRC&sw=w&u=rock77357&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE
Wolfson, Julia A., et al. "The US Public's Preference for Safer Guns." American Journal of
Public Health, vol. 106, no. 3, Mar. 2016, pp. 411-413. EBSCOhost,
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.303041.