GUIDELINE FOR SURVEY, INVESTIGATION, AND DESIGN

OF BLACK SPOT LOCATION (SID-LRK) IN LAMPUNG

PROVINCE, INDONESIA.
Budi Hartanto Susilo
Professor on Civil Engineering
Maranatha Christian University
Jl. Suria Sumantri 65, Bandung 40164
Email: budiharsus@yahoo.com

Abstract
In connection with the government's obligation to take responsibility for ensuring the safety
of traffic and road transport (LLAJ) for road users, it is necessary to attempt to achieve this
goal, one of which is to conduct Surveys, Investigations, and Design of Black Spot Location
(SID-LRK) . Therefore, there needs to be the guideline in doing SID-LRK. This is expected to
assist in the reduction and prevention of traffic accidents. So in this study compiled procedure
SID-LRK and as the application of the research conducted at the National roads in the
Province of Lampung. Application procedure resulted SID-LRK at five locations of black
spot.

Keywords : road safety, survey-investigation-desain (SID) of black spot

1. INTRODUCTION

Traffic accidents are one of the enormous problems faced by the Indonesian
Government. Data in the Police
Department, shows that each year more than 30,000 people died in traffic
accidents and over 70,000 people suffered injuries resulting in many event for life and the
cause of the poorer family.

In Indonesia, the number of vehicles increasing in every year and human error becomes a
major factor in the increase in traffic accidents. Data from Police Department said, in 2012,
occurred 109 038 cases of accidents with victims died as many as 27 441 people, with the
potential socio-economic losses of about Rp 203 trillion - Rp 217 trillion per year (2.9% -
3.1% of GDP Indonesia) around 17.5 billion USD . In 2011, an accident as much as 109 776
cases, with as many as 31 185 people dead victims.

In connection with the obligation of the government to be responsible for ensuring the safety
of traffic and road transport (LLAJ) for road users, it is necessary to attempt to achieve this
goal, one of which is to conduct Surveys, Investigations, and Design (SID) Black Spot
Location (LRK). Therefore, there needs to be the guideline in conducting Surveys,
Investigations, and Design (SID) Black Spot Location (LRK). This is expected to assist in the
reduction and prevention of traffic accidents.
2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Black Spot Location (LRK) is the location that has a high accident
rate with repeated accidents in a space and the same relative time frame.

3. TECHNICAL PROVISIONS

3.1 Identify Black Spot Location on the Frequency of Accident-prone

Identification of 20 or at least 10 worst Black Spot Location (LRK) done by the
highest accident frequency of accident data for 3 years in a row, or at
least the first time last year in a particular area, such as provincial, county, or city.

3.2 Techniques Ranking Black Spot Location

Ranking techniques crash site is done by weighting based on the economic value of an
accident (Equivalent Accident Number (AEK)). Equivalent Accident Number (AEK) is a
numeric scale used to grade weighting accidents, figure this is based on the economic value of
an accident with damage or loss of material, with a comparison:
MD : LB : LR : KM = 100 : 20 : 5 : 1 (1)
where:
MD is the number of died victims
LB is the number of serious injuries
LR is the number of light injuries
KM is the amount of Property Damage Only

In the case of mutual agreement, can also be taken a different comparison as shown in
Table 1.
Tabel 1. Equivalent Accident Number (AEK)
Ditjen Average
Ditjen
US Puslitban Hubda Polr BH value Average Rationalization Easy and Si
Hubda SP
A g Jalan t i S at mple
t
inf (Baru) Indonesia
o
(8) =
((2)+(3)+(4)+(
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (9)
5)
+(6)+(7)) / 6

M 32
900 12 12 12 10 300 111 100
D 5
LB 100 3 6 7 5 20 50 15 20
LR 10 3 3 3 1 6 5 3 5
K
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M

3.3 Determination of the Black Spot Locations Selected

In determining the number of elected LRK by AEK each LRK value is above
average and called UCL. The calculation is as follows:

(2)
The results of the determination of the number of elected LRK is
certainly considered the availability of funds.

3.4 Alternative Treatment Proposed

Alternative proposal outlining the handling of proposals in the form of improved handling
of the physical work, road equipment, and repair bad traffic operations to black spot
location / elected accident potential.

3.5 Detail Engineering Design (DED)

Detail Engineering Design (DED) is also called Final Engineering Design (RTA) is
a technical design drawings and details related to the handling of black spot
location / elected accident potential.

3.6 Estimated of Cost Management Needs

Estimates needs outlining the estimated costs of handling cost based on the alternative
proposal needs handling of the Black Spot Potential Location. Basically the method of
calculation of the cost of a volume or quantity derived from the design drawings multiplied by
the unit price analysis results which consists of the prices of wages, tools, and materials, in
order to get the standard price and the amount of the estimated cost.

4. GENERAL PROCEDURES

Stages procedure Survey, Investigation, and Design (SID) Black

Spot Location (LRK), ranging from the preparation, the
initial survey, initial analysis, detailed survey and detailed analysis, presented in the form of a
flow diagram, as shown in Figure 1.

a Collecting a traffic accident data

b Identify the location of the worst accidents
Preparation c Setting up a basic map of the road network
phase d Survey institutional coordination with relevant agencies
e Synchronization / check crash data
f Collecting supporting data

a Observing a road and environmental conditions in LRK

Preliminary
b Record and sketch / map the LRK
Survey Phase
c Marking and determine any LRK GPS base map of road network

Initial Analysis
LRK assign selected based on the ranking weighting AEK
Phase

a Observing a road and environmental conditions in selected LRK

Details b Recording and sketching / LRK mapped in detail
Survey Phase c Marking and determine the GPS every LRK on the base map of
the road network / topography / geography
 a Develop a treatment alternative proposal
Details
b Prepare Detail Engineering Design (DED)
Analysis Phase
c Prepare estimated cost requirements (RAB)

Figure 1. Stages procedure SID-LRK

4.1 Preparation
Some things have to be prepared in the implementation of Black Spot Location site
investigations, among others:
a. Collecting a traffic accident data for at least the past year. The accident
data can be obtained from various sources, i.e. over the internet (see Example 1)
b Perform processing accident data obtained from the internet to the
identified list of 10-20 worst crash site. List of worst crash site was obtained by reference
to technical provisions identifying black spot location based on the frequency
of accidents (section 5.1).
c Setting up a basic map of the road network available according to plan an
investigation to be conducted.
d Conducting a survey of institutional coordination with relevant agencies,
including collecting secondary data from the relevant agencies.
e. Synchronize or accident data matching processing results (points b) of the accident
data obtained from the relevant authorities or the result of coordination with the relevant
agencies. If there are differences in the locations of the worst, do the rating back to the
list of worst crash site survey.
f Collect data supporting or secondary and primary data, such as daily traffic
volume average on road sections at the crash site has been identified.
The results of the preparatory stages can be seen in Appendix A.

4.2 Early Stage Survey

Initial survey of LRK :
a. Observing a road and environmental conditions at LRK (10-20 locations)
using a video camera or a photo.
b. Recording and sketching / LRK charted.
c. Marking and determine the GPS every LRK on the base map of the road
network.
The early stages of the survey results can be found in Appendix B.

4.3 Early Stage Analysis

Preliminary analysis are:
From 10-20 worst LRK surveyed, then rated based on the level of accidents and AEK, in
order to obtain and set the locations. As for the determination of the number
of elected LRK by AEK each LRK value is above average and called UCL.
The results of the initial analysis stage can be seen in Appendix C.

4.4 Phase Survey Details

Detailed survey of the LRK :
a. Observing a road and environmental conditions in LRK (5-10 locations) using a video
camera or a photo.
b. Recording and sketching / LRK mapped in detail.
c. Marking and determine the GPS every LRK on the base map of the road network /
topography / geography.
Stages of the detailed survey results can be found in Appendix D.

4.5 Phase Analysis Details

Detailed analysis include:
a. Develop a treatment alternative proposal on 5-10 LRK the selected preset.
b. Prepare Detail Engineering Design (DED) on 5-10 LRK the selected preset
c. Prepare estimated cost requirements (RAB) at 5-10 LRK the selected preset.
d. Prepare technical specifications as part of the tender documents.
The results of the detailed analysis stage can be seen in Appendix E and F.

5. TECHNICAL PROCEDURES
Based on the stage of the General Procedure above, then do the steps in detail as
a technical procedure that Survey, Investigation, and Design (SID) Black Spot
Location (LRK). The description of the analysis carried out on the National road in the
Province of Lampung is originated from the collection of secondary data from the
last year. Then determined the location decision criteria based on the number
of occurrences LRK > 2 events per location, then called and elected LRK LRK as many as
14 locations. Data from the police is matched with the
data of Transportation and Highways Lampung, so elected 11 LRK point. AEK analysis is
then used to rank the 11 point LRK and based on the calculation of the average value of the
limit above, elected 5 LRK worst location.

Further activities and analysis of the 5 locations are conducting a

survey details, arrange alternative proposal of handling, preparing Detail Engineering
Design (DED), preparing cost estimates of requirements (RAB), prepare Draft
Guidelines SID / DED. Diagrammatically, a description and analysis of the survey work can
be seen in Figure 2.

For the record, the SID-

LRK activity monitoring and evaluation after work / physical construction work carried
out as advice beyond the SID / DED this.
 Secondary data last year / Recently Year Traiffic Police Directorate in Lampung Province
((237 accidents in January - August 2014) (ditlantaspoldalampung.web.id)

237 accidents been choose the worst

location (criteria:> 2 events per location)

Selected 14 surveyed locations to plan

Matching the data from Secondary data from Ditlantas Polda

Dishub Lampung
Recapitulation Number of Accidents
(44 LRK: 13 version Bina 2 Years Including Number & Type
Marga & 31 version Polda Victims, & Loss Materials (Direct)
Lampung)

Selected 11 points surveyed

LRK

Justification of the number

and types of economically
weighted victims and the level
of accidents

Voted 5 worst LRK based

Equivalent Accident Number
(AEK)

Survey Plan Details fifth LRK

analysis:
Develop alternative proposal on 5 LRK handling
Develop Detail Engineering Design (DED) on 5 LRK
Develop estimated cost requirements (RAB) at 5 LRK
Develop Draft Guidelines SID / DED
Monitoring and evaluation after work / physical construction
work carried out as advice beyond the SID / DED this.
 Figure 2. Flowchart of Application Procedure SID-LRK

5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 CONCLUSIONS
From the analysis of the LRK priority ranking of the 11 LRK and than elected 5 LRK.
The five of LRK elected by ratings and weighing of Equivalent Accidents
Number (AEK) (the ratio between the victim died (MD): serious injuries (LB): light
injuries (LR): Property Damage
Only (KM) = 100: 20: 5: 1), namely: (1) Jalinteng Km 38 (AEK = 248); (2) Jalinteng Km 21 (
AEK = 202); (3) Jalinteng Km 19 (AEK = 147); (4) Jalinteng Km 72 (AEK = 142); (5) Jalinte
ng Km 14 (AEK = 128). The five LRK has
been analyzed for handling alternative proposals, Detail Engineering Design (DED), and the
estimated cost requirements.

5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Results SID-LRK in Lampung Province is expected to be realized in order to reduce
the number of accidents in the province of Lampung. In addition to SID-LRK Guidelines can
be immediately distributed / disseminated to other provisions in Indonesia, so
that National can move together to reduce the number and severity of accidents in
accordance with the expectations of Presidential Instruction No. 4 of 2013, on the Decade of
Action for Safety, within the period 2011-2020.

For the achievement of activities that include LRK in Indonesia needs to be budgeted in the
form of an annual program continuously (multi-year program) so
that the estimated within 6 years, in 2020 seen a clear track record in the
hope LRK accident reduction target of 50% in accordance with Presidential Instruction No. 4
of 2013.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge and thanks to Director of Directorate of Safety Transportation, for
funding of the research. Also, the authors acknowledge and thanks to Mr. Teguh, Bandung,
for his assistances. The authors also appreciate all parties who have provided data and
providing any assistance in completing this study.

REFERENCES

Land Transport Safety Directorate (2014), Draft Guidelines

for Survey Investigation and Accident Prone Area Design (SID-LRK), The
Directorate General of Land Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Land Transport Safety Directorate (2014), Final Report: Investigation and Preparation
of Detailed Engineering Design (DED) Accident Prone Areas (DRK) in National
Road Lampung Province, The Directorate General of Land Transportation, Ministry of
Transportation, Jakarta.
http: // Ditlantas lampung.web.id regional police, accessed on August 31, 2014.
Institute for Road Safety Research SWOV (1982), Detection and Analysis of Black Spots With
Even Small Accident Figures, Leidschendam, Netherlands.
The Director General of Land No. SK.7234 / AJ.401 / DRJD / 2013 On the
Road Equipment Technical Guidelines, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Guidelines for National Standardization (PSN) No. 08 of 2007, writing the Indonesian
National Standard (SNI), the National Standardization Agency (BSN), Jakarta.
Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 13 Year 2014 About the Traffic Signs,
Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 34 Year 2014 About Marka Street,
Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 60 Year 2010 on the Organization and
Administration of the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Regulation of the Minister of Communications No. 75 Year 2013 About the Standard Cost
2014 in the Ministry of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation, Jakarta.
Government Regulation No. 32 Year 2011 on Management and Engineering, Impact Analysis,
Needs Traffic Management, Government of Indonesia, Jakarta.
Government Regulation No. 43 Year 1993 on the Infrastructure and Road Traffic, the
Government of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta.
Centre for Research and Development of Transport Infrastructure, (2004), Handling Traffic
Accident Prone Location, Pd T-09-2004-B, Ministry of
Settlement and Regional Parasarana, Jakarta.
Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), 1994, Accident Blackspot Investigation, Crowthorne
Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Wedasana, USA, 2011, Accident Prone Area Analysis and Preparation of Database Based
Geographic Information System (Case Study of Denpasar), Master Program,
Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School, University of Udayana, Denpasar.

APPENDICES

A.1 List of worst LRK based on the number of accidents

Table A.1. List the location of the accident on National Road in Lampung
during the month of January to August 2014
No. of Vivtims
No Location
acc MD LB LR
1 Jalinsum Km 14 15 Kab. Lampung Selatan 3 2 1 1
2 Jalinsum Km 16 17 Kab. Lampung Selatan 6 3 6 1
3 Jalinsum Km 19 20 Kab. Lampung Selatan 2 1 2 1
4 Jalinsum Km 20 21 Kab. Lampung Selatan 3 1 3 1
5 Jalinsum Km 21 22 Kab. Lampung Selatan 2 2 - -
 No. of Vivtims
No Location
acc MD LB LR
6 Jalinsum Km 24 25 Kab. Lampung Selatan 2 - 2 1
7 Jalinsum Km 36 37 Kab. Pesawaran 3 2 1 1
8 Jalinsum Km 38 39 Kab. Lampung Selatan 3 2 2 1
9 Jalinsum Km 81 82 Kab. Lampung Selatan 2 1 - 5
10 Jalintim Km 18 19 Kab. Lampung Selatan 2 - 3 4
11 Jalinsum Kab. Lampung Tengah 3 3 1 -
12 Jalinsum Km 66 Kab. Lampung Tengah 2 - 2 -
13 Jalintim Kab. Lampung Timur 4 1 5 3
14 Jalinbar Kab. Pesisir Barat 3 - 3 1

A.2 basic map of the road network

INDONESIA

Source: Keputusan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 631 Tahun 2009.

Figure A.2. National Road Network Map in Lampung Province

A.3 Institutional Survey Results

A3.1 Department of Transportation Lampung Province
Based on information obtained from the Department of Transportation Lampung Province, in
connection with the task of Chief Warrant Lampung Province Transportation
Agency No.801/SPRINT.257/III.06/2014 dated August 25, 2014 on the
Implementation Survey Accident Prone Locations in Lampung Province, delivered things as
follows:
1. Based on data published by the Highways Agency of Lampung Province there were
13 Black Spot Location (LRK) and based on data published by the Regional
Police (Polda) Lampung there are as many as 31 LRK.

Thirteen LRK published by the Highways Agency of Lampung Province, among others:
1). Tanjakan Tarahan Ruas 019 KM 21+500, Lampung Selatan;
2). Tikungan dan tanjakan Desa Hatta Ruas 020 KM 81+100 s/d 82+600, Lampung
Selatan;
3). dst.

Thirty-one LRK published by Lampung Police, among others:

1) Jl. Yos Sudarso (dekat CV. Vista Grain), Bandar Lampung;
2) Jl. Yos Sudarso (dekat CV. Bumi Waras, Way Lunik), Bandar Lampung;
3) dst.
2. Have 44 Black spot location (LRK), the team has carried out a
survey in 11 locations, namely:
1) Tikungan Batu Kramat Ruas 0,2 KM 69+700 s/d 70+200, Tanggamus;
2) Jalinbar Pekon Terbaya KM 95-96, Tanggamus;
3) dst.
d Secara rinci, hasil survey 11 LRK tersebut ditunjukkan pada Tabel A3.1.
3. The team that conducted the Black spot location survey (LRK) consists of: Dinas
Perhubungan Lampung Province;
1) Ditlantas POLDA Lampung;
2) Dinas Bina Marga Provinsi Lampung;
3) SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung;
4) PT. Jasa Raharja Lampung.
4 The results of the survey and study of the factors that cause or result in traffic will be
made next report.

Table A3.1. Survey Results 11 Location LRK from Dishub Lampung, Ditlantas POLDA
Lampung, Dinas Bina Marga Lampung, SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung, dan PT. Jasa
Raharja Lampung
No. Location Survey Results
1 Tikungan
Batu
Kramat
Ruas 0,2
KM
69+700 s/d
70+200,
Tanggamus

1) sharp cornering road conditions; 3) markers and signs less;

2) The condition of the security fence has 4) there is no street
been damaged by a lighting facilities;
recent landslide accumulation with gabion; 5) The width of the road +7
 No. Location Survey Results
2 Jalinbar
Pekon
Terbaya
KM 95-96,
Tanggamus

1) The condition of good road markings; 5) road bends sharp with reduced
2) The condition of good signs; visibility due to tree-
3) sharp cornering road conditions; covered thereby disrupting the
4) There is a bridge; driver's visibility.

A3.2 SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung

Based on information from SNVT P2JN Region 2 Lampung, obtained Recap Daily
Traffic Data Average (LHR) in Lampung Province in 2013, as shown by Table A3.2.

Table A3.2 - Data Traffic Daily Recap Average (LHR) in Lampung Province in 2013
Segment length LHR
No. No. Seg Name of Segment
(km) (vehicle)
1 001 Pematang Panggang Sp. Pematang 20,98 4.936
2 002 Sp. Pematang Sp. Bujung Tenuk 60,99 6.783
Sp. Bujung Tenuk Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. 3.495
3 003 18,96
Tl.Bawang
Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. Tl. Bawang Bts. Kab. 4.224
4 004 45,43
Lamteng/Kab. Lamtim
5 005 Bts. Kab. Lamteng/Kab. Lamtim Way Jepara 51,81 4.286
Way Jepara - Way Skp. Bunut 3.567
6 006 55,85
(Bts.Kab.Lamsel/Kab.Lamtim)
Way Skp. Bunut (Bts.Kab.Lamsel/Kab.Lamtim) - 3.968
7 007 33,15
Sp. Bakauheni
8 009 Sp. Empat - Bukit Kemuning 41,67 4.156
9 010 Bukit Kemuning - Bts. Kota Kotabumi 40,31 4.952
10 012 Bts. Kota Kotabumi - Terbanggi Besar 38,75 6.024
11 013 Terbanggi Besar - Gunung Sugih 11,74 7.320
12 014 Gunung Sugih - Tegineneng 25,13 9.057
13 019 Sukamaju - Sp. Kalianda 39,35 9.466
14 020 Sp. Kalianda - Bakauheni 27,38 8.247
15 032 Kota Agung - Rantau Tijang 24,38 4.104
16 033 Rantau Tijang Gedongtataan 30,42 5.946
 Segment length LHR
No. No. Seg Name of Segment
(km) (vehicle)
17 035 Sp. Bujung Tenuk - Bujung Tenuk 1,69 6.573
18 036 Bujung Tenuk - Terbanggi Besar 48,08 6.422
19 037 Bukit Kemuning - Padang Tambak 48,34 2.560

source: SNVT P2JN Wilayah 2 Lampung, 2014.

B.1 Results of a survey on the environmental condition of the road and LRK
Table B1 - LRK Survey Results
No. Location Observation Result
1 Jalinteng KM 72, The condition of the road is good;
Simpang Tiga 2) Marka road less clear;
Kotabumi 3) Land use is plantation;
Menggala 4) Number of accident = 2; MD =
1; LB = 2; LR = -

2 Jalinteng KM 14, 1) The condition of the road is

near PT. Nestle & good;
Pelabuhan Panjang 2) The condition of good markers;
3) Land use is the area of
industrial and port;
4) Number of accident = 3; MD =
2; LB = 1; LR = 1

3 Etc.
Description: The number of lacquer (traffic
accidents), MD (died), LB (severe injury), LR (minor injuries), based on
data POLDA Lampung (ditlantaspoldalampung.web.id), during the month
of January to July 2014.
 Figure B.1. Location 11 LRK Survey on map

C.1 Grading and determination of selected LRK

No. LHR Amout Amount Culation Amount
No. Location Ranking
S ection (Vehicle) Location MD LB LR Weighting Value
(9) = (6)*100 +
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (7)*20 + (8)*5 + (9) (10)
(5)*1
Jalinteng
1 13 7.320 2 0 2 0 0 + 40 + 0 + 2 42 9
KM 66
Jalinteng
2 13 7.320 2 1 2 0 100 + 40 + 0 + 2 142 5
KM 72
Jalinteng
3 9 4.156 1 1 0 0 100 + 0 + 0 + 1 101 6
KM 192
Jalinteng
4 19 9.466 2 1 2 1 100 + 40 + 5 + 2 147 4
KM 19
Jalinteng
5 19 9.466 3 2 1 1 100 + 20 + 5 + 3 228 2
KM 14
Jalinteng
6 9 4.156 1 0 1 0 0 + 20 + 0 + 1 21 11
KM 88
Jalinteng
7 19 9.466 2 2 0 0 200 + 0 + 0 + 2 202 3
KM 21
Jalinteng
8 19 9.466 2 0 2 1 0 + 40 + 5 + 2 47 8
KM 23
Jalinteng
9 19 9.466 3 2 2 1 200 + 40 + 5 + 3 248 1
KM 38
Jalintim
10 7 3.968 1 1 0 0 100 + 0 + 0 + 1 101 7
KM 90
Jalintim
11 2 6.783 1 0 2 0 0 + 40 + 0 + 1 41 10
KM 128
amount 1320

Table C.1. Ranking LRK by AEK

Description: Weight value: MD: LB: LR: KM = 100: 20: 5: 1

In determining the number of elected LRK done by AEK each LRK value is above
average and called UCL. The calculation is as follows:
1320
= = = 120
11
*Look at Tabel C1 kolom (1) dan (9).
So LRK who have chosen is AEK value > 120, namely:
(1) Jalinteng KM 38 (AEK = 248)
(2) Jalinteng KM 14 (AEK = 228)
(3) Jalinteng KM 21 (AEK = 202)
(4) Jalinteng KM 19 (AEK = 147)
(5) Jalinteng KM 72 (AEK = 142)
D1 Results in LRK selected sketches based on conditions on the
ground and geographical map.

LRK

Figure D.1. LRK di Jalinteng KM 14 (rank 2)

LRK

Figure D2. LRK di Jalinteng KM 72 (rank 5)

E.1 Alternative proposal handling

Table E.1. Proposed Alternative to 5 LRK Selected
No. Location Existing Condition Type of Accident Alternative proposal handling
1 Jalinteng 1) Geometri jalan >< 1) Pemasangan rambu: peringatan
KM 14 berupa tikungan; Kendaraan yang tikungan ke kiri (Tabel II (1a)*)
2) Bahu jalan berupa memaksa dan pengarah tikungan ke kiri
sirtu mendahului saat di (Tabel II (11d)*) (untuk arah
tikungan sehingga menuju Bandar Lampung),
peringatan tikungan ke kanan
No. Location Existing Condition Type of Accident Alternative proposal handling
tabrakan dengan (Tabel II (1b)*) dan pengarah
kendaraan dari arah tikungan ke kanan (Tabel II
berlawanan (11e)*) (untuk arah menuju
Bakauheni); Pemasangan paku
jalan**.
2) Bahu jalan diperkeras dengan
perkerasan beton semen.
2 Jalinteng 1) Marka jalan kurang >> 1) Pengecatan marka garis tengah
KM 72 jelas Truk mengalami dan garis tepi jalan di ketiga
2) Simpang tiga yang rem blong dan lengan simpang**.
memiliki volume menabrak truk 2) Pemasangan lampu penerangan
lalu lintas yang lainnya dari jalan umum (LPJU)***.
cukup besar di belakang 3) Pemangkasan pepohonan.
ketiga lengan 4) Perbaikan pemasangan
simpang tersebut. penempatan rambu Peringatan
3) Pepohonan yang Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kanan
mulai masuk ruang ((Tabel II (4b9)*), rambu
jalan. Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga
4) Rambu Peringatan Sisi Kiri (Tabel II (4b8)*),
Persimpangan Tiga rambu Peringatan Persimpangan
Sisi Kanan yang Tiga Tipe T (Tabel II (4b18)*)
terhalang rambu dan rambu Petunjuk Jurusan
Petunjuk Jurusan, (Tabel V (1b)*.
dan juga belum
terpasanganya
rambu Petunjuk
Jurusan dari lengan
lainnya pada
persimpangan
tersebut.
Keterangan: >< Headon collision
>> front-rear collision
* Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas;
** Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Tentang Marka Jalan;
*** Look at Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Nomor
SK.7234/AJ.401/DRJD/2013 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perlengkapan Jalan.

E.2 Detail Engineering Design (DED)

E2.1 Location LRK in Lampung Province for job handling
Figure E.1. Location LRK at Lampung Province for job handling
 E2.2 List quantity LRK handling work in Lampung Tabel E.2.
Table E.2. List the quantity of work handling LRK in Lampung
No. Lokasi Usulan Kuantitas Satuan
1 Jalinteng Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke kiri (ukuran 75 x 75 1 buah
KM 14 cm) (Tabel II (1a)*)
Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kiri (ukuran 90 x 75 5 buah
cm) (Tabel II (11d)*)
Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke kanan (ukuran 75 x 1 buah
75 cm) (Tabel II (1b)*)
Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kanan (ukuran 90 x 75 5 buah
cm) (Tabel II (11e)*)
Pemasangan paku jalan (ukuran 10 x 15 x 2 cm)** 10 buah
Bahu jalan diperkeras sepanjang 500 m dan lebar 2 m per arah (=
4 m untuk 2 arah) dengan perkerasan berbutir dan perkerasan
beton semen, meliputi:
Galian tanah untuk konstruksi perkerasan bahu jalan = 500m 2.000 m2
x 4m;
Perataan & pemadatan permukaan galian untuk konstruksi 2.000 m2
perkerasan bahu jalan = 500m x 4m;
Perkerasan Beton Semen (K-350) dengan tebal 20cm = 500m 400 m3
x 4m x 0,2;
Lapis Pondasi Bawah Beton Kurus (K-175) dengan tebal 10 200 m3
cm = 500m x 4m x 0,1m
Mobilisasi 1 LS
Manajemen dan Keselamatan Lalu Lintas selama proyek 1 LS
berlangsung
Pemasangan marka garis tepi (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) 120 m2
(Thermoplastic) untuk 2 arah**
2 Jalinteng Pemasangan marka garis tengah di ketiga lengan simpang 180 m2
KM 72 (ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic)**
Pemasangan marka garis tepi jalan di ketiga lengan simpang 180 m2
(ukuran 3 x 120 mm) (Thermoplastic)**
Pemasangan LPJU Konvensional*** 3 buah
Pemangkasan ranting pohon 1 LS
Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kanan 1 buah
(ukuran 75 x 75 cm) ((Tabel II (4b9)*)
Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Sisi Kiri 1 buah
(ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b8)*)
Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan Tiga Tipe T 1 buah
(ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (4b18)*)
Pemasangan rambu Pendahulu Petunjuk Jurusan yang 3 buah
Menunjukkan Jurusan yang Dituju (ukuran 120 x 180 cm) Tabel
V (1b)*
Keterangan: * Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Rambu Lalu
Lintas;
** Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Tentang Marka Jalan;
*** Look at Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Nomor
SK.7234/AJ.401/DRJD/2013 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perlengkapan Jalan.
Figure E2.3 technical design LRK handling in Lampung

Figure E.2. LRK handling technical design drawings in Lampung Province to

Jalinteng KM 14.

Figure E.3. LRK handling technical design drawings in Lampung Province to

Jalinteng KM 72
 Figure E.4. Technical drawing traffic signs for handling LRK in Lampung Provice

Figure E.5. Technical drawing installation of traffic signs for handling LRK in
Lampung Province
 E.3 Estimates of the cost needs (RAB)
Table E.3. Estimates of the cost needs (RAB) for handling LRK in Prov. Lampung
No Lokasi Harga Satuan
Usulan Vol Satuan Jumlah (Rp)
(Rp)
^
1 Jalinteng Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke kiri 1 buah 1.487.868 1.487.868
KM 14 (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (1a)*)
^
Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kiri 5 buah 1.487.868 7.439.340
(ukuran 90 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (11d)*)
^
Pemasangan rambu peringatan tikungan ke 1 buah 1.487.868 1.487.868
kanan (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (1b)*)
^
Pemasangan rambu pengarah tikungan ke kanan 5 buah 1.487.868 7.439.340
(ukuran 90 x 75 cm) (Tabel II (11e)*)
^
Pemasangan paku jalan (ukuran 10 x 15 x 2 10 buah 294.740 2.947.400
cm)**
Bahu jalan diperkeras sepanjang 500 m dan
lebar 2 m per arah dengan perkerasan berbutir
dan beton semen, meliputi:
- Galian tanah = 500m x 4m; 2.000 m2 53.836 ^^
107.672.000
- Perataan & pemadatan permukaan galian = 2.000 m2 6.415 ^^
12.830.000
500m x 4m;
- Perkerasan Beton Semen (K-350) tebal 20cm 400 m3 2.812.320 ^^
1.124.928.000
= 500 x 4 x 0,2 m;
- Lapis Pondasi Bawah Beton Kurus (K-175) 200 m3 1.271.431 ^^
254.286.200
tebal 10 cm = 500 x 4 x 0,1m
- Mobilisasi 1 LS 50.000.000 ^^
50.000.000
- Manajemen dan Keselamatan Lalu Lintas 1 LS 15.000.000 ^^
15.000.000
selama proyek
Pemasangan marka garis tepi (ukuran 3 x 120 120 m2 35.062 ^
4.207.440
mm) (Thermoplastic) untuk 2 arah**
Jumlah 1.589.725.456
2 Jalinteng Pemasangan marka garis tengah di ketiga lengan 180 m2 35.062 ^
6.311.160
KM 72 simpang (ukuran 3 x 120 mm)
(Thermoplastic)**
Pemasangan marka garis tepi jalan di ketiga 180 m2 35.062 ^
6.311.160
lengan simpang (ukuran 3 x 120 mm)
(Thermoplastic)**
^
Pemasangan LPJU Konvensional*** 3 buah 16.550.166 49.650.498
^^
Pemangkasan ranting pohon 1 LS 5.000.000 5.000.000
^
Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan 1 buah 1.487.868 1.487.868
Tiga Sisi Kanan (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II
(4b9)*)
^
Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan 1 buah 1.487.868 1.487.868
Tiga Sisi Kiri (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II
(4b8)*)
^
Pemasangan rambu Peringatan Persimpangan 1 buah 1.487.868 1.487.868
Tiga Tipe T (ukuran 75 x 75 cm) (Tabel II
(4b18)*)
^
Pemasangan rambu Pendahulu Petunjuk Jurusan 3 buah 13.557.078 40.671.234
yang Menunjukkan Jurusan yang Dituju (ukuran
120 x 180 cm) (Tabel V (1b)*
Jumlah 112.407.656
Keterangan: * Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 Tentang Rambu Lalu Lintas;
** Look at Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 34 Tahun 2014 Tentang Marka Jalan;
*** Look at Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Darat Nomor SK.7234/AJ.401/DRJD/2013 Tentang Petunjuk
Teknis Perlengkapan Jalan.
^
From Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 75 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Biaya Tahun 2014 Di Lingkungan
Kementerian Perhubungan;
^^
From Harga Satuan Bina Marga tahun 2013 (Indonesia Infrastructure Initiative - IndII)