Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Effect of non-payment of filing fees on claim for damages: the court acquired
no jurisdiction over the claims. However, compulsory counterclaims for
damages and attorneys fees are not subject of filing fees.
Art. 2195. The provisions of this Title shall be respectively applicable to all
obligations mentioned in Article 1157.
Art. 2196. The rules under this Title are without prejudice to special
provisions on damages formulated elsewhere in this Code. Compensation for
workmen and other employees in case of death, injury or illness is regulated
by special laws. Rules governing damages laid down in other laws shall be
observed insofar as they are not in conflict with this Code.
In case of conflict bet. the civil code and special laws, the former prevails
insofar as issues of damages are concered. However, compensation for
workmen and other EEs in case of death, injury or illness shall be regulated
by special laws.
It has been held by the supreme court that the EE may either sue under the
Workmens Compensation Act or under the Civil Code. After having chosen
one, he cannot choose the other.
Labor arbiter or NLRC can entertain and decide claims for damages (arising
from ER-EE rel.) Las has jurisdiction to award not only the reliefs provided by
the labor laws but also damages governed by the Civil Code.
As a rule, moral damages are recoverable where the dismissal of the EE was
attended by bad faith or fraud or constituted an act of oppression to labor, or
was done in manner contrary to morals, good customs or public policy.
Exemplary damages may be awarded if the dismissal is effected in a
wanton, oppressive, or malevolent manner.
Regular courts have jurisdiction over actions for damagers where the Er-Ee
rel is merely incidental and the cause of action proceeds from a different
source of obli, such as where the damages claimed were based on tort,
malicious prosecution, or breach of contract, or when the claimant seeks to
recover a debt from a former Ee or seeks liquidated damages for
enforcement of a prior employment contract.
Art. 2198. The principles of the general law on damages are hereby adopted
insofar as they are not inconsistent with this Code.
Limitations on the award for damages: in no instance shall the judge grant
damages more than what had been proved in court.
When proof is not clear or satisfactory, the appellate court may remand the
case to the court of origin for new trial in order to ascertain the amount of
damages.
Damages may be awarded on the basis of hearsay evidence.
Except as provided by law or by stipulation indicates that there are cases
when actual or compensatory damages need not proved; GR: damages must
be proved is subject to the ff xpns:
1. When a penalty clause is agreed upon in the contract bet. the
parties (Art. 1226)
2. When liquidated damages have been agreed upon (Art. 2226)
3. When loss is presumed as when a child or spouse dies as a result
of the act or omission of a person;
4. Forfeiture of bonds in favor of the govt for the purpose of
promoting public policy or interest;
5. Death caused w/in the contemplation of Art. 2206.
In the above situations, actual or compensatory interest damages
need not be proven.
Effect of reservation to file civil action independently of the criminal action:
the grant of moral damages in the criminal case is improper because the
claim for civil liability in the criminal case is waived.
An award for actual damages be executed pending appeal may be executed
pending appeal. However, award for moral or exemplary damages cannot be
executed pending appeal because the same cannot be regarded as fixed or
definite until there is a final judgment. The grant depends upon the result of
the main case.
A person injured by breach of contract cannot recover damages for any loss
w/c he might have avoided w/ ordinary care at reasonable expenses.
Art. 2200. Indemnification for damages shall comprehend not only the value
of the loss suffered, but also that of the profits which the obligee failed to
obtain.
Art. 2201. In contracts and quasi-contracts, the damages for which the
obligor who acted in good faith is liable shall be those that are the natural
and probable consequences of the breach of the obligation, and which the
parties have foreseen or could have reasonably foreseen at the time the
obligation was constituted.
In case of fraud, bad faith, malice or wanton attitude, the obligor shall
be responsible for all damages which may be reasonably attributed to the
non-performance of the obligation.
- Applies to contracts and quasi-contracts thus presupposing the existence of
a pre-existing contractual relationship between the parties. While in quasi-
contract there is no consent given by the parties, it is the law w/c provides
for the missing consent referred to as presumptive consent
1st par. situation wherein the defendant is in gf
2nd par. when the defendant is in bf
Unlike the 1st par., there is no necessity of the damage being natural or
probable consequence of the act or omission complained of. Neither, is there
a necessity of the foreseeability of the consequences. It is sufficient that the
damage may be reasonably attributed to the breach or non-performance of
the obli.
Art. 2202. In crimes and quasi-delicts, the defendant shall be liable for all
damages which are the natural and probable consequences of the act or
omission complained of. It is not necessary that such damages have been
foreseen or could have reasonably been foreseen by the defendant.
Art. 2203. The party suffering loss or injury must exercise the diligence of a
good father of a family to minimize the damages resulting from the act or
omission in question.
Art. 2206. The amount of damages for death caused by a crime or quasi-
delict shall be at least three thousand pesos, even though there may have
been mitigating circumstances. In addition:
(1) The defendant shall be liable for the loss of the earning capacity of the
deceased, and the indemnity shall be paid to the heirs of the latter; such
indemnity shall in every case be assessed and awarded by the court, unless
the deceased on account of permanent physical disability not caused by the
defendant, had no earning capacity at the time of his death;
(2) If the deceased was obliged to give support according to the provisions
of Article 291, the recipient who is not an heir called to the decedent's
inheritance by the law of testate or intestate succession, may demand
support from the person causing the death, for a period not exceeding five
years, the exact duration to be fixed by the court;
Art. 2207. If the plaintiff's property has been insured, and he has received
indemnity from the insurance company for the injury or loss arising out of
the wrong or breach of contract complained of, the insurance company shall
be subrogated to the rights of the insured against the wrongdoer or the
person who has violated the contract. If the amount paid by the insurance
company does not fully cover the injury or loss, the aggrieved party shall be
entitled to recover the deficiency from the person causing the loss or injury.
- Attorneys fees and litigation expenses. Judicial costs are excluded bec. they
are fixed by Rule 142 and their payment is ministerial
- Attorneys fees contemplated extraordinary attorneys fees w/c are items
of actual damages.
Extraordinary indemnity for damages ordered by the
court to be paid by the losing party to the prevailing
party in a litigation.
Made in favor of the litigant, not of his counsel.
Ordinary reasonable compensation paid to a lawyer
by his client for the legal services he has rendered to
the latter.
The parties to a contract may stipulate on payment of atty.s fees. (may be
based on a certain percentage of the amt of the principal obligation)
In the absence of stipulation, atty.s fees are not recoverable, except in the
case mentioned in Art. 2208; in the absence of gross and evident bf in
defendants refusal to satisfy plaintiffs claim, and there being none of the
grounds enumerated in Art. 2208, such absence precludes a recovery of
atty.s fees in the trial court.
If not pleaded and prayed for in the complaint, atty.s fees are barred.
Ordinary atty.s fees payable even if not expressly agreed upon quasi-
contract; determination of the amt will be on the basis of quantum meruit.
The reason for the award of atty.s fees must be stated in the text of the
courts decision; otherwise, if it is stated only in the dispositive portion, the
same must be disallowed on appeal.
Atty.s fees must be alleged and prayed for.
General prayer, not sufficient to justify atty.s fees.
Moral damages and atty.s fees cannot be consolidated for they are diff. in
nature and each must be separately determined.
Charging exorbitant extraordinary atty.s fees denial is proper; if ordinary
atty.s fees the court has the authority to reduce the same to a reasonable
amount.
Art. 2209. If the obligation consists in the payment of a sum of money, and
the debtor incurs in delay, the indemnity for damages, there being no
stipulation to the contrary, shall be the payment of the interest agreed upon,
and in the absence of stipulation, the legal interest, which is six per cent per
annum.
Art. 2210. Interest may, in the discretion of the court, be allowed upon
damages awarded for breach of contract.
Reckoned from the date the judgment of the trial court was rendered.
If the parties agreed that no interest whatsoever shall be due, the
principal shall not bear interest.
Art. 2212. Interest due shall earn legal interest from the time it is judicially
demanded, although the obligation may be silent upon this point. (1109a)
(1) That the plaintiff himself has contravened the terms of the contract;
(2) That the plaintiff has derived some benefit as a result of the contract;
(5) That since the filing of the action, the defendant has done his best to
lessen the plaintiff's loss or injury.
Art. 2217. Moral damages include physical suffering, mental anguish, fright,
serious anxiety, besmirched reputation, wounded feelings, moral shock,
social humiliation, and similar injury. Though incapable of pecuniary
computation, moral damages may be recovered if they are the proximate
result of the defendant's wrongful act for omission.
Art. 2219. Moral damages may be recovered in the following and analogous
cases:
(10) Acts and actions referred to in Articles 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34,
and 35.
The spouse, descendants, ascendants, and brothers and sisters may bring
the action mentioned in No. 9 of this article, in the order named.
Art. 2220. Willful injury to property may be a legal ground for awarding
moral damages if the court should find that, under the circumstances, such
damages are justly due. The same rule applies to breaches of contract
where the defendant acted fraudulently or in bad faith.
Art. 2221. Nominal damages are adjudicated in order that a right of the
plaintiff, which has been violated or invaded by the defendant, may be
vindicated or recognized, and not for the purpose of indemnifying the
plaintiff for any loss suffered by him.
Art. 2222. The court may award nominal damages in every obligation arising
from any source enumerated in Article 1157, or in every case where any
property right has been invaded.
Art. 2224. Temperate or moderate damages, which are more than nominal
but less than compensatory damages, may be recovered when the court
finds that some pecuniary loss has been suffered but its amount can not,
from the nature of the case, be provided with certainty.
Art. 2226. Liquidated damages are those agreed upon by the parties to a
contract, to be paid in case of breach thereof.
Art. 2228. When the breach of the contract committed by the defendant is
not the one contemplated by the parties in agreeing upon the liquidated
damages, the law shall determine the measure of damages, and not the
stipulation.
Art. 2232. In contracts and quasi-contracts, the court may award exemplary
damages if the defendant acted in a wanton, fraudulent, reckless,
oppressive, or malevolent manner.
Art. 2234. While the amount of the exemplary damages need not be proved,
the plaintiff must show that he is entitled to moral, temperate or
compensatory damages before the court may consider the question of
whether or not exemplary damages should be awarded. In case liquidated
damages have been agreed upon, although no proof of loss is necessary in
order that such liquidated damages may be recovered, nevertheless, before
the court may consider the question of granting exemplary in addition to the
liquidated damages, the plaintiff must show that he would be entitled to
moral, temperate or compensatory damages were it not for the stipulation
for liquidated damages.