Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Library of
Measures
Pre-Publication Copy
Joint Commission International
A division of Joint Commission Resources, Inc.
The mission of Joint Commission International (JCI) is to improve the safety and quality of care in the
international community through the provision of education, publications, consultation, and evaluation
services. Joint Commission Resources educational programs and publications support, but are separate
from, the accreditation activities of Joint Commission International. Attendees at Joint Commission
Resources educational programs and purchasers of Joint Commission Resources publications receive no
special consideration or treatment in, or confidential information about, the accreditation process.
2011 Joint Commission International
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without
written permission from the publisher.
Requests for permission to make copies of any part of this work should be mailed to
Permissions Editor
Department of Publications
Joint Commission Resources
One Renaissance Boulevard
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 U.S.A.
permissions@jcrinc.com
For more information about Joint Commission Resources, please visit
http://www.jcrinc.com.
For more information about Joint Commission International, please visit
http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org.
Measures provide healthcare professionals and organizations with valuable information about
their performance. Organizations can use this information to make comparisons with other
organizations or with themselves over time. Comparison helps organizations see where they
may be falling short and when processes may be breaking down; thus helping to facilitate
improved performance.
Accreditation programs around the world are moving toward more objective measurements of
quality and patient safety. Over time, the on-site evaluation process will be adjusted to reflect
priority evaluation issues gleaned from measurement data. Accreditation becomes continuous
when a flow of objective data comes to JCI between on-site evaluations. All of this requires
reduction in the variations between organizations in terms of what they collect and how they
collect it. The JCI International Library of Measures is a first step in a multi-year effort to bring
JCI accreditation to the next level. d>:/
improve the quality and safety of patient care around the world.
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Aspirin received within 24 hours of arrival to the hospital for patients having an acute
I-AMI-1 myocardial infarction (AMI).
I-AMI-2 Aspirin prescribed at discharge for patients who had an acute myocardial infarction.
I-AMI-9 Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who expire during the hospital stay
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Heart failure patients with documentation in the hospital record that left ventricular
systolic (LVS) function was evaluated before arrival, during hospitalization, or is
I-HF-2 planned for after discharge
Stroke (STK)
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
I-STK-8 Stroke patients who were given stroke education during their hospital stay
I-STK-10 Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients who were assessed for rehabilitation services
I-CAC-1 Pediatric asthma patients who received relievers during this hospitalization
I-CAC-2 Pediatric asthma patients who received systemic corticosteroids during hospitalization
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Psychiatric patients who were placed in physical restraints during their inpatient
hospitalization. This measure will determine the total number of hours that patients
were maintained in physical restraints for those admitted to a hospital-based inpatient
I-HBIPS-2 psychiatric setting
Psychiatric patients who were placed in seclusion during their inpatient hospitalization.
This measure will determine the total number of hours that all patients were
maintained in seclusion for those admitted to a hospital-based inpatient psychiatric
I-HBIPS-3 setting.
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Patients with elective vaginal deliveries or elective cesarean sections at >= 37 and < 39
I-PC-01 weeks of gestation completed
I-PC-05 Exclusive breast milk feeding during the newborn's entire hospitalization
Pneumonia (PN)
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Pneumonia patients, aged 65 and older, who were screened for pneumococcal vaccine
I-PN-2 status and were administered the vaccine prior to discharge, if indicated
Adult smoking cessation advice/counseling given to patients who smoke cigarettes and
I-PN-4 who are hospitalized for pneumonia
Pneumonia patients, aged 50 and older, who during the flu season, were screened for
I-PN-7 influenza vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to discharge, if indicated
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Prophylactic antibiotics received one hour prior to surgical incision for hip arthroplasty
I-SCIP-Inf-1d patients
Prophylactic antibiotics received one hour prior to surgical incision for knee
I-SCIP-Inf-1e arthroplasty patients
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Patients who received VTE prophylaxis (or reasons of why this was not done) on the
day of or day after hospital admission or surgery.<BR>Note: This measure applies to
I-VTE-1 medical and surgical cases that are not included in the SCIP measure population
ICU patients who received VTE prophylaxis (or reasons of why this was not done) on
the day of or day after hospital admission or surgery.<BR>Note: This measure applies
to all ICU cases except those included in the SCIP measure population (knee/hip
I-VTE-2 arthroplasty) who had surgery on the day of or the day after ICU admission or transfer
Acute Myocardial
Infarction (AMI)
Measure Set
I-AMI-2 Aspirin prescribed at discharge for patients who had an acute myocardial infarction.
I-AMI-9 Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who expire during the hospital stay
I-AMI 1 Aspirin received within 24 hours of arrival to the hospital for patients
having an acute myocardial infarction.
Overview/Details:
Aspirin received within 24 hours of arrival to the hospital for patients having an acute
myocardial infarction (AMI).
Rationale:
The early use of aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction results in a
significant reduction in adverse events and subsequent mortality.
Outcomes:
Mortality: Decreased mortality
Readmissions within 30 days: Decreased
Reliability: Increased delivery of evidence based care
Improvement noted as: Increase in rate
Patient Settings/Services
Emergency Services/Department
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
I-AMI 1
Measure Details
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: AMI patients who received aspirin within 24 hours before or after hospital
arrival
Data elements:
x Aspirin received within 24 hours before or after hospital arrival
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
x Reason for no aspirin on arrival
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 principal diagnosis code for
AMI as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.1
x Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et
al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable
angina/nonST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of
Patients With Unstable Angina/NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction):
developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,
American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine,
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of
Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1157.
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the
1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial
Infarction). 2004.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et
al. ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and
nonST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
(Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and
NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2046 99.
x Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither
among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2
(Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet.
1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349w-60.
x Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin
and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. The
RISC Group. Lancet. 1990;336(8719):827-830.
x Theroux P, Ouimet H, McCans J et al. Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute
unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(17):1105-1111.
Overview/Details:
Aspirin prescribed at discharge for patients who had an acute myocardial
infarction (AMI).
Rationale:
Aspirin therapy in patients who have suffered an acute myocardial infarction reduces
the risk of adverse events and mortality.
Outcomes:
Mortality: Decreased mortality
Readmissions within 30 days : Decreased
Reliability: Increased delivery of evidence based care
Improvement noted as: Increase in rate
Patient Settings/Services
Medical/Surgical units
I-AMI 2
Measure Details
Reasons and Implications: Studies have demonstrated that aspirin reduces the risk
of adverse events and mortality by 20%. Clinical guidelines strongly recommend long-
term aspirin for the secondary prevention of subsequent cardiovascular events in
eligible patients discharged after AMI.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Aspirin Prescribed at Discharge
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
x Reason for no aspirin at discharge
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 principal diagnosis code for
AMI as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.1
x Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et
al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable
angina/nonST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of
Patients With Unstable Angina/NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction):
developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,
American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine,
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of
Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1157.
x Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomized trials of
antiplatelet therapy - I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by
prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ.
1994;308:81-106.
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the
1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial
Infarction). 2004.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et
al. ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non
ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
(Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and
NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2046 99.
x Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al. AHA/ACC
guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other
atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2130
9. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.026.
Overview/Details:
ACEI or ARB prescribed at discharge for patients with LVSD after having an acute
myocardial infarction (AMI).
NOTE: For the purposes of this measure, LVSD is defined as chart documentation of a
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% or a narrative consistent with
moderate or severe systolic dysfunction.
Rationale:
ACEI inhibitors reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular systolic
dysfunction (LVSD) after AMI. Clinical trials have also established ARB therapy as an
acceptable alternative to ACEI, especially in patients with heart failure and/or LVSD who
are ACEI intolerant.
Outcomes:
Mortality: Decreased mortality
Readmissions within 30 days: Decreased
Reliability: Increased delivery of evidence based care
Improvement noted as: Increase in rate
Reasons and Implications: Clinical guidelines strongly recommend ACEI for patients
hospitalized with AMI who have either clinical heart failure or LVSD. Guideline
FRPPLWWHHVKDYHDOVRVXSSRUWHGWKHLQFOXVLRQRI$5%VLQSHUIRUPDQFHPHDVXUHVIRU
AMI.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: AMI patients who are prescribed an ACEI or ARB at hospital discharge
Data elements:
x ACEI Prescribed at Discharge
x ARB Prescribed at Discharge
Denominator: AMI patients with LVSD and who are >= 18 years
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
x LVSD
x Reason for No ACEI and No ARB at Discharge
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 principal diagnosis code for
AMI as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.1 and chart documentation of LVEF less than
40% or a narrative description of LVS function consistent with moderate or severe
systolic dysfunction
x Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et
al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable
angina/nonST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of
Patients With Unstable Angina/NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction):
developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,
American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine,
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of
Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1157.
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the
1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial
Infarction). 2004.
x Flather MD, Yusuf S, Kober L et al. Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients
with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data
from individual patients. ACE-Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group.
Lancet. 2000;355(9215):1575-1581.
x Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with
chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to
angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet.
2003;362:772-776.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et
al. ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non
ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
(Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and
NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2046 99.
x Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, Basta L, Brown EJ, Jr., Cuddy TE, et al, for
the SAVE Investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients
with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival
and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669-77.
x Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in
myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or
both. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1893-1906.
Overview/Details:
Smoking cessation advice/counseling given to patients (cigarette smokers) who had an
acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
NOTE: For the purposes of this measure, a smoker is defined as someone who has
smoked cigarettes anytime during the year prior to hospital arrival.
Rationale:
Smoking cessation reduces mortality and morbidity in all populations. Patients who
receive even brief smoking-cessation advice from their health care providers are more
likely to quit.
Outcomes:
Mortality: Decreased mortality
Readmissions within 30 days : Decreased
Reliability: Increased delivery of evidence based care
Improvement noted as: Increase in rate
Patient Settings/Services
Medical/Surgical units
Numerator: AMI patients (cigarette smokers) who receive smoking cessation advice or
counseling during the hospital stay
Denominator: AMI patients with a history of smoking cigarettes anytime during the
year prior to hospital arrival who are >= 18 years
Measure Details
Reasons and Implications: Smoking cessation reduces mortality and morbidity in all
populations. Patients who receive even brief smoking-cessation advice from their
health care providers are more likely to quit. Clinical guidelines strongly recommend
smoking cessation counseling for smokers hospitalized with AMI.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: AMI patients (cigarette smokers) who receive smoking cessation advice or
counseling during the hospital stay
Data elements:
x Adult Smoking Counseling
Denominator: AMI patients with a history of smoking cigarettes anytime during the
year prior to hospital arrival who are >= 18 years
Data elements:
x Adult Smoking History
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 principal diagnosis code for
AMI as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.1 and a history of smoking cigarettes anytime
during the year prior to hospital arrival
x Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et
al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable
angina/nonST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of
Patients With Unstable Angina/NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction):
developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,
American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine,
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of
Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1157.
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the
1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial
Infarction). 2004.
x Fiore MC, Jan CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence:
2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et
al. ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non
ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
(Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and
NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2046 99.
x Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al. AHA/ACC
guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other
atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2130
9. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.026.
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who are prescribed a beta-blocker at hospital
discharge
Rationale:
Long-term use of beta blockers for patients who have suffered an acute myocardial
infarction can reduce mortality and morbidity. Studies have demonstrated that the use
of beta-blockers is associated with a 20% reduction in this risk.
Outcomes:
Mortality: Decreased mortality
Readmissions within 30 days : Decreased
Reliability: Increased delivery of evidence based care
Improvement noted as: Increase in rate
Patient Settings/Services
Medical/Surgical units
Reasons and Implications: Studies have demonstrated that the use of beta-blockers
is associated with a 20% reduction in risk and there is evidence of effectiveness in
broad populations of patients. Clinical guidelines strongly recommend long-term beta-
blocker therapy for the secondary prevention of subsequent cardiovascular events in
patients discharged after AMI.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Beta-Blocker Prescribed at Discharge
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
x Reason for no Beta-blocker at discharge
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 principal diagnosis code for
AMI as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.1
x Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et
al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable
angina/nonST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
(Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of
Patients With Unstable Angina/NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction):
developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians,
American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine,
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of
Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1157.
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation
myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the
1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial
Infarction). 2004.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et
al. ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non
ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
(Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and
NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2046 99.
x Krumholz HM, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Chen J, Heiat A, Marciniak TA. National use
and effectiveness of E-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute
myocardial infarction: National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA.
1998;280:623-629.
x Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al. AHA/ACC
guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other
atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2130
9. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.026.
x Yusuf S, Wittes J, Friedman L. Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in
heart disease. I. Treatments following myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988;
260(14):2088:2093.
I-AMI 9 Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who expire during hospital
stay
Overview/Details:
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who expired during the hospital stay
Rationale:
Mortality of patients with AMI represents a significant outcome potentially related to the
quality of care. This rate-based indicator identifies an undesirable outcome of care.
High rates over time may warrant investigation into the quality of care provided.
Outcomes:
Mortality: A decrease in the rate
Improvement noted as: Decrease in rate
Patient Settings/Services
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Measure Details
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Discharge status
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 principal diagnosis code for
AMI as defined in Appendix A, Table 1.1
Note: This measure population does not include deaths that occurred in the
emergency department
References
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial
infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999
Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). 2004.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et al.
ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and nonST-
elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
(Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and Non
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2046 99.
x Maggioni AP, et al: Age related increase in mortality among patients with first
myocardial infarctions treated with thrombolysis: the Investigators of the Gruppo
,WDOLDQRSHUOR6WXGLRGHOOD6RSUDYYLYHQ]DQHOO,QIDUWR0LRFDUGLFR*,66,-2). N Engl J
Med. 1993;329:1442-1448.
I-HF 2 Heart failure patients with documentation in the hospital record that left
ventricular systolic (LVS) function was evaluated before arrival, during
hospitalization, or is planned for after discharge
Overview/Details:
Rationale:
Outcomes:
Patient Settings/Services
Medical/Surgical units
Numerator: Heart failure patients with documentation in the hospital record that LVS
function was evaluated before arrival, during hospitalization, or is planned for after
discharge
7LPHOLQHVV
Clinical guidelines advocate evaluation of left ventricular systolic function as the single
most important diagnostic test in the management of all patients with heart failure.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: Heart failure patients with documentation in the hospital record that LVS
function was evaluated before arrival, during hospitalization, or is planned for after
discharge
Data elements:
x LVF Assessment
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
x LVF Assessment
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for heart
failure as defined in Appendix A, Table 2.1
I-HF-2
References
x Bonow RO, Bennett S, Casey DE, Ganiats TG, Hlatky MA, Konstam MA, et al.
ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults With Chronic Heart Failure: a
report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure
Clinical Performance Measures). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:114478. Available at
http://www.acc.org and http://www.americanheart.org.
x Heart Failure Society of America. HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure
Practice Guideline. J Card Fail. 2006 Feb;12(1):e1-2.
x Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, et al,
writing on behalf of the 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and
Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult Writing Committee. 2009
focused update: ACCF/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2009;53:1343 82.
Overview/Details:
Heart failure patients with LVSD who are prescribed and ACEI or ARB at hospital
discharge
NOTE: For the purposes of this measure, LVSD is defined as chart documentation of a
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% or a narrative consistent with
moderate or severe systolic dysfunction.
Rationale:
ACEI inhibitors reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure and left
ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and are effective in a wide range of patients.
Clinical trials have also established ARB therapy as in acceptable alternative to ACEI,
especially in patients who are ACEI intolerant.
Outcomes:
Medical/Surgical units
Numerator: Heart failure patients who are prescribed an ACEI or ARB at hospital
discharge
Denominator: Heart failure patients with LVSD who are >= 18 years
Reasons and Implications: Clinical guidelines strongly recommend ACEI for patients
hospitalized with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Guideline
committees have also supported the inclusLRQRI$5%VLQSHUIRUPDnce measures for
heart failure.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Numerator: Heart failure patients who are prescribed an ACEI or ARB at hospital
discharge
Data elements:
Denominator: Heart failure patients with LVSD who are >= 18 years
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
x LVSD
x Reason for No ACEI and No ARB at Discharge
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for heart
failure as defined in Appendix A, Table 2.1 and chart documentation of LVEF less than
40% or a narrative description of LVS function consistent with moderate or severe
systolic dysfunction
x Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/nonST-
elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the
2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/NonST-Elevation
Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency
Physicians, American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine,
Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic
Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1157.
x Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA
guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report
of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice
Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With
Acute Myocardial Infarction). 2004.
x Flather MD, Yusuf S, Kober L et al. Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart
failure or left-ventricular dysfunction: a systematic overview of data from individual patients.
ACE-Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;355(9215):1575-
1581.
x Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic
heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-
converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet. 2003;362:772-776.
x Krumholz HM, Anderson JL, Bachelder BL, Fesmire FM, Fihn SD, Foody JM, et al.
ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and nonST-elevation
myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop
Performance Measures for ST-Elevation and NonST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction).J
Am Coll Cardiol.2008;52:204699.
x Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, Basta L, Brown EJ, Jr., Cuddy TE, et al, for the SAVE
Investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular
dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement
Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669-77.
x Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial
infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med.
2003;349:1893-1906.
x Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al. AHA/ACC
guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic
vascular disease: 2006 update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2130 9.
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.026.
x Torp-Pedersen C, Kober L. Effect of ACE inhibitor trandolapril on life expectancy of patients
with reduced left-ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. TRACE Study
Group. Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation. Lancet. 1999;354(9172):9-12.
x Yusuf S, Pepine CJ, Garces C et al. Effect of enalapril on myocardial infarction and
unstable angina in patients with low ejection fractions. Lancet. 1992;340(8829):1173-1178.
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
NOTE: For purposes of this measure, a smoker is defined as someone who has
smoked cigarettes anytime during the year prior to hospital arrival.
Rationale:
Smoking cessation reduces mortality and morbidity in all populations. Patients who
receive even brief smoking-cessation advice from their health care providers are more
likely to quit.
Outcomes:
Patient Settings/Services
Medical/Surgical units
Numerator: Heart failure patients (cigarette smokers) who receive smoking cessation
advice or counseling during the hospital stay
Denominator: Heart failure patients with a history of smoking cigarettes anytime during
the year prior to hospital arrival and who are >= 18 years.
(IIHFWLYHQHVV Asthma
Cancer
COPD
Diabetes
Reasons and Implications: Smoking cessation reduces mortality and morbidity in all
populations. Patients who receive even brief smoking-cessation advice from their health
care providers are more likely to quit. Clinical guidelines strongly recommend smoking
cessation counseling for cigarette smokers with cardiovascular disease, including heart
failure.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Numerator: Heart failure patients (cigarette smokers) who receive smoking cessation
advice or counseling during the hospital stay
Data elements:
Denominator: Heart failure patients with a history of smoking cigarettes anytime during the
year prior to hospital arrival and who are >= 18 years
Data elements:
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for HF as defined
in Appendix A, Table 2.1 and a history of smoking cigarettes anytime during the year prior
to hospital arrival
x Bonow RO, Bennett S, Casey DE, Ganiats TG, Hlatky MA, Konstam MA, et al.
ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults With Chronic Heart Failure:
a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure
Clinical Performance Measures). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:114478. Available
at http://www.acc.org and http://www.americanheart.org.
x Fiore MC, Jan CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence:
2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. May 2008.
x Heart Failure Society of America. HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure
Practice Guideline. J Card Fail. 2006 Feb;12(1):e1-2.
x Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, et al,
writing on behalf of the 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and
Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult Writing Committee. 2009
focused update: ACCF/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2009;53:1343 82.
Table 2.1
Heart Failure Codes
Table 2.2
Left Ventricular Assistive Device (LVAD) and Heart Transplant
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
CMCode
Code Code Code
33.6 COMB HEART/LUNG TRANSPLA
Stroke (STK)
Measure Set
Measure
Code Measure Description
Stroke (ST K )
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Patients with ischemic stroke prescribed antithrombotic therapy at
I-STK-2 discharge
Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter receiving anticoagulation
I-STK-3 therapy
Stroke patients who were given stroke education during their
I-STK-8 hospital stay
Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients who were assessed for
I-STK-10 rehabilitation services
Overview/Details:
Patients prescribed antithrombotic therapy at discharge after having an ischemic stroke.
Rationale:
Data at this time suggest that antithrombotic therapy should be prescribed at discharge
following acute ischemic stroke to reduce stroke mortality and morbidity as long as no
contraindications exist.
Patient Settings/Services
Emergency Services/Department
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative
data and medical records.
Data elements:
x Antithrombotic therapy prescribed at discharge
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x Elective Carotid Intervention
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x Reason for not prescribing antithrombotic therapy at discharge
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for
ischemic stroke as defined in Appendix A, Table 8.1
I-STK-2
References
x Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, Grubb RL, Higashida
RT, Jauch EC, Kidwell C, Lyden PD, Morgenstern LB, Qureshi AI, Rosenwasser RH,
Scott PA, Wijdicks E. Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults with Ischemic
Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention
Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care
Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke. 2007;38:1655-1711.
x Adams H, Adams R, Del Zoppo G, Goldstein LB. Guidelines for the Early Management
of Patients With Ischemic Stroke: Guidelines Update A Scientific Statement From the
Stroke Council of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke
Vol. 36, 2005: 916:923.
x Albers GW, Amarenco P, Easton JD, Sacco RL, Teal P. Antithrombotic and
Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke. Chest Vol. 119, 2001: 300-320.
x Brott TG, Clark WM, Grotta JC, et al. Stroke the first hours. Guidelines for acute
treatment. Consensus Statement. National Stroke Association. 2000.
x Chen ZM, Sandercock P, Pan HC, et al. Indications for early aspirin use in acute
ischemic stroke: a combined analysis of 40,000 randomized patients from the Chinese
acute stroke trial and the international stroke trial. On behalf of the CAST and IST
collaborative groups, Stroke 2000;31:1240-1249.
x Coull BM, Williams LS, Goldstein LB, et al. Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents in
Acute Ischemic Stroke. Report of the Joint Stroke Guideline Development Committee of
the American Academy of Neurology and the American Stroke Association (a Division
of the American Heart Association) Stroke. 2002;33:1934 -1942.
x Guideline on the Use of Aspirin as Secondary Prophylaxis for Vascular Disease in
Primary Care, Centre for Health Services Research University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
& Centre for Health Economics of York, 1998.
x Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K, Goldstein LB,
Gorelick P, Halperin J, Harbaugh R, Johnston SC, Katzan I, Kelly-Hayes M, Kenton EJ,
Marks M, Schwamm LH, Tomsick T. Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients
With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Statement for Healthcare
Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
Council on Stroke: Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and
Intervention. Stroke. Vol. 37, 2006:577.
Overview/Details:
Patients with ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation/flutter discharged on anticoagulation
therapy.
Rationale:
A prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are among a limited number of
predictors of high stroke risk within the population of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Patient Settings/Services
Emergency Services/Department
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Anticoagulation therapy prescribed at discharge
Data elements:
x Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter
x Birthdate
x Elective Carotid Intervention
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x Reason for Not Prescribing Anticoagulation Therapy
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for ischemic
stroke as defined in Appendix A, Table 8.1.
References
I-STK 8 Stroke patients who were given stroke education during their hospital
stay
Overview/Details:
Patients with ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke who are given educational
materials on all of the following; activation of emergency medical system, need for
follow-up after discharge, medications prescribed at discharge, risk factors for stroke,
and warning signs and symptoms of stroke.
Rationale:
Clinical practice guidelines include recommendations for patient and family education
during hospitalization as well as information about resources for social support services.
Some clinical trials have shown measurable benefits in patient and caregiver outcomes
with the application of education and support strategies. The type of stroke experienced
and the resulting outcomes will play a large role in determining not only the course of
treatment but also what education will be required.
Patient Settings/Services
Emergency Services/Department
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Education Addresses Activation of Emergency Medical System
x Education Addresses Follow-up after Discharge
x Education Addresses Medications Prescribed at Discharge
x Education Addresses Risk Factors for Stroke
x Education Addresses Warning Signs and Symptoms of Stroke
Data elements:
x Elective Carotid Intervention
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for ischemic
stroke as defined in Appendix A, Table 8.1, or Table 8.2 and who are discharged to
home or home care.
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
Each year hundreds of thousands of people experience a new or recurrent stroke.
Approximately two thirds of these individuals survive and require rehabilitation. Stroke
is a leading course of serious long-term disability in all countries. Many of these
patients are left with moderate functional impairment and some with severe disability.
More than half of patients who have experienced a stroke, or serious injury, have never
received rehabilitation.
Rationale:
Stroke rehabilitation should begin as soon as the diagnosis of stroke is established and
life-threatening problems are under control. Among high priorities for stroke patients
are to mobilize the patient and encourage resumption of self-care activities as soon as
possible. A considerable body of evidence indicates better clinical outcomes when
patients with stroke are treated in a setting that provides coordinated, multidisciplinary
stroke-related evaluation and services.
Outcomes:
Mortality: Decreased mortality
Readmissions within 30 days: Decreased
Reliability: Increased delivery of evidence based care
Improvement noted as: Increase in rate
Patient Settings/Services
Emergency Services/Department
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Denominator: Ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke patients who are >= 18 years.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
Assessed for Rehabilitation Services
Denominator: Ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke patients who are > = 18 years
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x Elective Carotid Intervention
x ICD principal diagnosis code
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for ischemic
stroke or hemorrhagic stroke as defined in Appendix A, Table 8.1 or Table 8.2.
Table 8.1
Ischemic Stroke (STK)
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
CM
Code Code Code
Code
Table 8.2
Hemorrhagic Stroke (STK)
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CM
Code
430 SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE
431 INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE
&KLOGUHQV$VWKPD
Care (CAC)
Measure Set
Measure
Code Measure Description
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Pediatric asthma patients who received relievers during this
I-CAC-1 hospitalization
I-CAC-1 5HOLHYHUVIRU&KLOGUHQV,QSDWLHQW$VWKPD
Overview/Details:
Rationale:
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children and a major cause of morbidity
and increased health care expenditures. For children, asthma is one of the most
frequent reasons for admission to hospitals. Under-treatment and/or inappropriate
treatment of asthma are recognized as major contributors to asthma morbidity and
mortality. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in children,
recommend the use of relievers to gain control of acute asthma exacerbation and
reduce severity as quickly as possible, with step down medication to the least
medication necessary to maintain control.
Pediatric units
Medical/Surgical units (serving pediatric patients)
Free-standing Pediatric hospitals
Measure Name: 5HOLHYHUVIRU&KLOGUHQV,QSDWLHnt Asthma
Numerator: Pediatric asthma inpatients who received relievers during this
hospitalization.
Denominator: Pediatric asthma inpatients (age 2 years through 17 years) who were
discharged with a principal diagnosis of asthma
&RQWLQXLW\
QPS.3 antibiotic and other
(IIHFWLYHQHVV medication use
3UHYHQWLRQ(DUO\'HWHFWLRQ
7LPHOLQHVV
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Relievers Administered
Denominator: Pediatric asthma inpatients (age 2 years through 17 years) who were
discharged with a principal diagnosis of asthma
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis code
x Reason for Not Administering Relievers
I-CAC-1
References
x Adams RJ, Fuhlbrigge A, Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, Livingston JM, Weiss KB, and
Weiss ST (2001). Use of Inhaled Anti-inflammatory Medication in Children with
Asthma in Managed Care Settings. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent
Medicine, 155, 501-507.
x Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics: A Compendium
of Evidence-Based Research for Pediatric Practice. American Academy of
Pediatrics, 1999.
x Crain EF, Weiss KB and Fagan MJ (1995). Pediatric Asthma Care in U.S. Emergency
Departments. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 149, 893-901.
x Gross KM, Ponte CD (1998). New Strategies in the Medical Management of Asthma.
American Family Physician. 58:1
x McCormick MC, Kass B, Elixhauser A, Thompson J and Simpson L (2000). Annual
Report on Access to and Utilization of Health Care for Children and Youth in the
United States 1999. Pediatrics, 105:1, 219-230.
x Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Even-Shoshan O, Shabbout M, Zhang X, Bradlow ET,
and Marsh RR (2003). Length of Stay, Conditional Length of Stay, and Prolonged
Stay in Pediatric Asthma. Health Services Research, 38: 3, 867-886.
x Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (EPR-3) (2007).
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
x Asthma Management Model System, http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
x National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
Measure Overview
Rationale:
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children and a major cause of morbidity
and increased health care expenditures nationally. For children, asthma is one of the
most frequent reasons for admission to hospitals. Under-treatment and/or inappropriate
treatment of asthma are recognized as major contributors to asthma morbidity and
mortality. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in children,
recommend the use of systemic corticosteroids to gain control of acute asthma
exacerbation and reduce severity as quickly as possible, with step down medication to
the least medication necessary to maintain control.
Denominator: Pediatric asthma inpatients (age 2 years through 17 years) who were
discharged with a principal diagnosis of asthma
&RQWLQXLW\
QPS.3 antibiotic and
(IIHFWLYHQHVV other medication use
3UHYHQWLRQ(DUO\'HWHFWLRQ
7LPHOLQHVV
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: Pediatric asthma inpatients who received systemic corticosteroids during
hospitalization.
Inclusions to the population: Patients who were administered systemic corticosteroids
during this hospitalization.
Exclusions to the population: None
Data elements:
x Systemic Corticosteroids Administered
Denominator: Pediatric asthma inpatients (age 2 years through 17 years) who were
discharged with a principal diagnosis of asthma
Data elements:
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis code
x Reason for Not Administering Systemic Corticosteroids
I-CAC-2
References
x Adams RJ, Fuhlbrigge A, Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, Livingston JM, Weiss KB, and
Weiss ST (2001). Use of Inhaled Anti-inflammatory Medication in Children with
Asthma in Managed Care Settings. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent
Medicine, 155, 501-507.
x Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics: A Compendium
of Evidence-Based Research for Pediatric Practice. American Academy of
Pediatrics, 1999.
x Crain EF, Weiss KB and Fagan MJ (1995). Pediatric Asthma Care in U.S. Emergency
Departments. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 149, 893-901.
x Gross KM, Ponte CD (1998). New Strategies in the Medical Management of Asthma.
American Family Physician. 58:1
x McCormick MC, Kass B, Elixhauser A, Thompson J and Simpson L (2000). Annual
Report on Access to and Utilization of Health Care for Children and Youth in the
United States 1999. Pediatrics, 105:1, 219-230.
x Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Even-Shoshan O, Shabbout M, Zhang X, Bradlow ET,
and Marsh RR (2003). Length of Stay, Conditional Length of Stay, and Prolonged
Stay in Pediatric Asthma. Health Services Research, 38: 3, 867-886.
x Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma (EPR-3) (2007).
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
x Asthma Management Model System, http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
x National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
Table 6.1
Asthma Codes
Hospital Based
Inpatient Psychiatric
Services (HBIPS)
Measure Sets
Measure
Code Measure Description
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
Patients who are placed in physical restraint while admitted to a hospital-based inpatient
psychiatric setting.
Rationale:
The use of seclusion and restraint is limited to situations that may present imminent
danger to either the patient and/or staff. The use of restraint is rigorously monitored and
analyzed to prevent future restraint use and to prevent harm.
Patient Settings/Services
Psychiatric units
Numerator: The total number of hours that all psychiatric inpatients were maintained in
physical restraints.
$SSURSULDWHQHVV *RDO
3UHYHQWLRQ(DUO\'HWHFWLRQ
6DIHW\
Reasons and Implications: The use of restraint is limited to situations that may present
imminent danger to either the patient and/or staff. The use of restraint is rigorously
monitored and analyzed to prevent future restraint use and to prevent harm. Providers also
seek to prevent violence or aggression from occurring in their treatment environments by
focusing their attention on prevention activities that have a growing evidence base.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data and
medical records.
Numerator: The total number of hours that all psychiatric inpatients were maintained in
physical restraints.
Inclusions to the population: Patients for whom at least one physical restraint event is
reported during the month.
Data elements:
x Event Date
x Event Type
x Minutes of Physical Restraint
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Psychiatric Care Setting
x Psychiatric Inpatient days
I-HBIPS-2
References
Measure Overview
NOTE: This measure will determine the total number of hours that all patients were
maintained in seclusion for those admitted to a hospital-based inpatient psychiatric
setting.
Overview/Details:
Rationale:
The use of seclusion and restraint is limited to situations that may present imminent
danger to either the patient and/or staff. The use of seclusion is rigorously monitored
and analyzed to prevent future restraint/seclusion use and to prevent harm.
Patient Settings/Services
Psychiatric units
Numerator: The total number of hours that all psychiatric inpatients were held in
seclusion.
3UHYHQWLRQ(DUO\'HWHFWLRQ
6DIHW\
Reasons and Implications: The use of seclusion and restraint is limited to situations
that may present imminent danger to either the patient and/or staff. The use of either
restraint or seclusion is rigorously monitored and analyzed to prevent future restraint
use and to prevent harm. Providers also seek to prevent violence or aggression from
occurring in their treatment environments by focusing their attention on prevention
activities that have a growing evidence base.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Numerator: The total number of hours that all psychiatric inpatients were held in
seclusion.
Inclusions to the population: Patients for whom at least one seclusion event is
reported during the month.
Data elements:
x Event Date
x Event Type
x Minutes of Seclusion
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Psychiatric Care Setting
x Psychiatric Inpatient days
Table 10.01
Mental Disorders
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
CMCode
Code Code Code
295.10 HEBEPHRENIA-UNSPEC
295.11 HEBEPHRENIA-SUBCHRONIC
295.12 HEBEPHRENIA-CHRONIC
295.13 HEBEPHREN-SUBCHR/EXACERB
295.14 HEBEPHRENIA-CHR/EXACERB
295.15 HEBEPHRENIA-REMISSION
295.20 CATATONIA-UNSPEC
295.21 CATATONIA-SUBCHRONIC
295.22 CATATONIA-CHRONIC
295.23 CATATONIA-SUBCHR/EXACERB
295.24 CATATONIA-CHR/EXACERB
295.25 CATATONIA-REMISSION
297.2 PARAPHRENIA
300.5 NEURASTHENIA
300.7 HYPOCHONDRIASIS
302.1 ZOOPHILIA
302.2 PEDOPHILIA
302.4 EXHIBITIONISM
302.81 FETISHISM
302.82 VOYEURISM
307.0 STUTTERING
307.52 PICA
307.6 ENURESIS
307.7 ENCOPRESIS
312.32 KLEPTOMANIA
312.33 PYROMANIA
315.01 ALEXIA
Nursing Sensitive
Care (NSC)
Measure Set
Measure
Code Measure Description
Overview/Details:
Note: Please see Attachment E for details on how to collect this measure.
Rationale: The incidence of hospitalized patients developing pressure ulcers has been
reported to range from 2.7 percent to 29.5 percent in various clinical studies. Certain
circumstances (e.g., immobility, incontinence, impaired nutritional status ,critical illness,
etc.) further increase the risk for selected patients. The development of hospital
acquired pressure ulcers (HAPU) places the patient at risk for other adverse events and
may lead to increased lengths of stay. HAPUs also increase resource consumption and
costs. In most vulnerable patients, reducing risk factors and implementing
preventive/treatment measures will reduce the incidence of new pressure ulcer
development and prevent the worsening of existing ulcers. Recommendations from the
clinical guidelines include the individuals at risk and early intervention with a goal of
maintaining and improving tissue tolerance in order to prevent injury. In most vulnerable
patients, reducing risk factors and implementing preventive/treatment measures will
reduce the incidence of new pressure ulcer development and prevent the worsening of
existing ulcers. Nurses and nursing-care interventions play an important role in
pressure ulcer prevention and management. The use of this prevalence measure allows
organizations to monitor this important patient outcome at points in time and examine
institutional processes.
Medical/surgical units
Intensive Care units/Critical care units
Measure Name: Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (Hospital-Acquired)
Denominator: All patients surveyed for the study who are > = 18 years.
(IIHFWLYHQHVV &.'
QPS.3 infection,
3UHYHQWLRQ(DUO\ Detection prevention and 'LDEHWHV7\SH,,,
+,9$,'6
&DQFHU
&23'
Data Collection:
Data elements:
Denominator: All patients surveyed for the study who are > = 18 years.
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Sex
x Type of unit
x AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (2006). Numbers of patients
with pressure sores increasing. ttp://hcup.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.asp
x Allman, R. (1997). Pressure ulcer prelavence, incidence and risk factors and
impact. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 13(3), 421-436.
x Allman, R. (2001). Pressure ulcers: Using what we know to improve quality of
care. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 49, 996-997.
x Allman, R., Goode, P., Burst, N., Bartolucci, A., & Thomas, D. (1999) Pressure
ulcer, hospital complications, and disease severity: Impact on hospital costs and
length of stay. Advances in Wound Care, 12(1), 22-30.
x Anderson, C. & Rappl, L. (2004). Lateral rotation mattresses for wound healing.
Ostomy/Wound Management, 50(4), 50-62.
x Baumgarten M, Margolis DJ, Localio AR, Kagan SH, Lowe RA, Kinosian B,
Holmes JH, Abbuhl SB, Kavesh W, Ruffin A. Pressure ulcers among elderly
patients early in the hospital stay. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006
Jul;61(7):749-54.
x Black J, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, Dorner B, Edsberg L, Langemo D,
Posthauer ME, Ratliff C, Taler G; National Pressure Ulcer Advisory
Panel.National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer
staging/categorizing system. Dermatol Nurs. 2007 Aug;19(4):343-9; quiz 350.
x Braden BJ, Maklebust J. Preventing pressure ulcers with the Braden scale: An
update on this easy-to-XVHWRROWKDWDVVHVVHVDSDWLHQWVULVN$P-1XUV
2005;105:70-72.
x Dale, M.C., Burns, A., Panter, L., & Morris, J. (2001). Factors affecting survival of
elderly nursing home residents. Internal Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 16, 70-
76.
x European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory
Panel. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide.
Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009.
x Fogerty MD, Abumrad NN, Nanney L, Arbogast PG, Poulose B, Barbul A. Risk
factors for pressure ulcers in acute care hospitals. Wound Repair Regen. 2008
Jan- Feb;16(1):11-8.
x Hart S, Bergquist S, Gajewski B, Dunton N. Reliability testing of the National
Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator. J Nurs Care
Qual. 2006 Jul-Sep;21(3):256-65.
x Hopkins, A., Dealey, C., Bale, S., Defloor, T., & Worboys, F. (2006). Patient
stories of living with a pressure ulcer. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 56(4), 345-
353.
Overview/Details:
All documented falls with or without injury, experienced by patients in a calendar month.
Rationale: Patient falls occurring during hospitalization can result in serious and even
potentially life threatening consequences for many patients. Efforts to reduce this
adverse event have included the development of tools to assess and identify patients at
risk of falling and the implementation of fall prevention protocols. More recently,
research has suggested that staffing on patient care units, specifically the number of
professional nurses, may impact the incidence of this patient outcome. Nurses are
responsible for identifying patients who are at risk for falls and for developing a plan of
care to minimize that risk. High performance measure rates may suggest the need to
examine clinical and organizational processes related to the identification of, and care
for, patients at risk of falling, and possibly staffing effectiveness on the unit.
Medical/surgical units
Intensive Care units/Critical care units
Measure Name: Patient Falls
(IIHFWLYHQHVV &.'
+,9$,'6
&DQFHU
&23'
Reasons and Implications: Patient falls occurring during hospitalization can result in
serious and even potentially life threatening consequences for many patients. Efforts to
reduce this adverse event have included the development of tools to assess and identify
patients at risk of falling and the implementation of fall prevention protocols. More
recently, research has suggested that staffing on patient care units, specifically the
number of professional nurses, may impact the incidence of this patient outcome.
Nurses are responsible for identifying patients who are at risk for falls and for developing
a plan of care to minimize that risk. High performance measure rates may suggest the
need to examine clinical and organizational processes related to the identification of, and
care for, patients at risk of falling, and possibly staffing effectiveness on the unit.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Numerator: Total number of patient falls (with or without injury to the (patient) during the
calendar month.
Data elements:
x Month
x Number of Injury Falls
x Type of Unit
x Year
Denominator Statement: Patient days by Type of Unit during the calendar month.
Included Populations:
x Inpatients, short stay patients, observation patients and same day surgery
patients who receive care on eligible in-patient units for all or part of a day.
x Adult critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, medical-surgical
combined, and mixed acuity units.
x Any age patient on an eligible reporting unit is included in the patient day count.
Excluded Populations: Other unit types (e.g., pediatric, obstetrical, rehab, etc)
Data Elements:
x Month
x Patient Days
x Type of Unit
x Year
I-NSC 5 All documented falls by a patient with an injury level of minor (2) or
greater.
Overview/Details:
Numerator: Number of patient falls with an injury level of minor or greater during the
calendar month.
(IIHFWLYHQHVV &.'
+,9$,'6
&DQFHU
&23'
Reasons and Implications: Patient falls occurring during hospitalization can result in
serious and even potentially life threatening consequences for many patients. Nurses are
responsible for identifying patients who are at risk for falls and for developing a plan of care
to minimize that risk. Short staffing, nurse inexperience and inadequate nurse knowledge
could place patients at risk for injury. High performance measure rates may suggest the
need to examine clinical and organizational processes related to the identification of, and
care for, patients at risk of falling, and possibly staffing effectiveness on the unit.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Numerator: Number of patient falls with an injury level of minor or greater during the
calendar month
x Visitors
x Students
x Staff members
Data elements:
Denominator Statement: Patient days by Type of Unit during the calendar month.
Included Populations:
x Inpatients, short stay patients, observation patients and same day surgery patients
who receive care on eligible in-patient units for all or part of a day.
x Adult critical care, step-down, medical, surgical, medical-surgical
combined, and mixed acuity units.
Excluded Populations: Other unit types (e.g., pediatric, obstetrical, rehab, and the like)
Data Elements:
x Month
x Patient Days
x Type of Unit
x Year
Data Accuracy:
x ,QMXU\OHYHO-when the initial fall report is written by the nursing staff, the extent of
the injury may not yet be known. A method to follow-XSRQWKHSDWLHQWVFRQGLWLRQDW
least 24 hours later should be established.
x A fall injury level of level of death may be selected only if the fall caused the death of
the patient, not if dying caused the fall.
x Eligible reporting unit(s) will calculate and report fall data by calendar month. In
addition, each unit that reports fall data must also collect patient day data for the
same month in order to calculate fall with injury rates.
x Fall rate is calculated by multiplying the numerator by 1,000 and then dividing by the
denominator.
The time and staff required to do a prevalence study depends on the size of the hospital
DQGWKHXQLWVDVZHOODVWKHVWXG\WHDPVH[SHULHQFHLQ conducting the observation,
extracting required data elements from the clinical record and documenting the
information. Experienced sites have indicated that the prevalence study process
requires some learning at first and benefits from a core group of staff that is very skilled
in the study area. This greatly improves the validity and reliability of the data. Other
suggestions include the pairing of less experienced staff with experts, in teams, to
provide a rich teaching/learning experience and as a valuable competency development
strategy. It is also important that the study team(s) has (have) at least one
planning/training session prior to the day on which the study is conducted.
1) Assign a coordinator
4) Observation
b. Restraint Use Prevalence: Each patient on the assigned unit is observed (i.e.,
observations are not to be referred by staff for those patients thought to be
restrained).
7) Data Submission
a. Pressure Ulcer Prevalence: After the chart review and patient observation
have been completed, data collection tools should be checked for accuracy, and
completeness. Completed study data should be submitted using a defined
procedure for internal analysis or following procedures as defined for external
data submission.
8) Important Notes
g. A patient with a very long length of stay, who was surveyed previously, should
be counted and surveyed again as long as they remain a patient in your facility.
Measure
Code Measure Description
Overview/Details:
Patients who had an elective vaginal delivery or elective cesarean section performed
at greater than or equal to 37 weeks and less than 39 weeks gestation completed.
Rationale:
Clinical guidelines have had in place a standard requiring 39 completed weeks
gestation prior to ELECTIVE delivery, either vaginal or operative. Studies have
determined that elective delivery or elective cesarean section prior to the gestational
age of 39 weeks may result in significant short term neonatal morbidity (neonatal
intensive care unit admission rates of 13-21%).
Patient Settings/Services
Obstetric/Maternal units
Medical/Surgical units
Denominator: Patients delivering newborns with >= 37 and < 39 weeks of gestation
completed
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Inclusions to the population: ICD principal code for one or more of the following:
x Medical induction of labor (Appendix A Table 11.05)
x Cesarean section as defined in Appendix A, Table 11.06 while not in active labor,
or experiencing spontaneous rupture of membranes
Data elements:
x Active Labor
x ICD Principal/Other Procedure code
x Spontaneous Rupture of Membranes
Denominator: Patients delivering newborns with >= 37 and < 39 weeks of gestation
completed
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Gestational age
x ICD principal/other diagnosis code
I-PC-01
References
Overview/Details:
Patients, during their first pregnancy who presented with a single fetus in a normal
(vertex position) who were delivered by cesarean section at 37 or more weeks of
gestation completed.
Rationale:
Studies have demonstrated that over 60% of the variation among hospitals can be
attributed to first birth labor induction rates and first birth early labor admission rates.
Clinical studies have shown if labor was forced when the cervix was not ready, the
outcomes were poorer. Studies have also shown the use of that labor and delivery
guidelines can make a difference in labor outcomes.
Patient Settings/Services
Labor and Delivery units
Medical/Surgical units
Clinical studies found that over 60% of the variation among hospitals can be
attributed to first birth labor induction rates and first birth early labor admission
rates. The results have shown if labor was forced when the cervix was not ready,
the outcomes were poorer. Many authors have shown that physician factors,
rather than patient characteristics or obstetric diagnoses are the major driver for
the difference in rates within a hospital.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code or ICD Other Procedure
Codes for cesarean section as defined in Appendix A, Table 11.06
Data elements:
x ICD principal/other procedure Code
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Gestational age
x ICD other diagnosis code
x ICD other procedure code
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD procedure code
x Parity
Inclusions to the population: Nulliparous patients with ICD Principal Diagnosis Code
or ICD Other Diagnosis Codes for outcome of delivery as defined in Appendix A, Table
11.08 and with a delivery of a newborn with 37 weeks or more of gestation completed
x Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2002). AHRQ Quality Indicators
Guide to Inpatient Quality Indicators: Quality of Care in HospitalsVolume,
Mortality, and Utilization. Revision 4 (December 22, 2004). AHRQ Pub. No. 02-
RO204.
x Alfirevic, Z., Edwards, G., & Platt, M.J. (2004). The impact of delivery suite
JXLGHOLQHVRQLQWUDSDUWXPFDUHLQVWDQGDUGSULPLJUDYLGD(XU-2EVWHW*\QHFRO
Reprod Biol.115:28-31.
x American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2000). Task Force on
Cesarean Delivery Rates. Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery. (Developed under
the direction of the Task Force on Cesarean Delivery Rates, Roger K. Freeman,
MD, Chair, Arnold W. Cohen, MD, Richard Depp III, MD, Fredric D. Frigoletto Jr,
MD, Gary D.V. Hankins, MD, Ellice Lieberman, MD, DrPH, M. Kathryn Menard,
MD, David A. Nagey, MD, Carol W. Saffold, MD, Lisa Sams, RNC, MSN and
ACOG Staff: Stanley Zinberg, MD, MS, Debra A. Hawks, MPH, and Elizabeth
Steele).
x Bailit, J.L., Garrett, J.M., Miller, W.C., McMahon, M.J., & Cefalo, R.C. (2002).
Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187(3):721-7.
x Bailit, J. & Garrett, J. (2003). Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies. Am
J Obstet Gynecol.102:45-51. * Bailit, J.L., Love, T.E., & Dawson, N.V. (2006).
Quality of obstetric care and risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates. Am J
Obstet Gynecol.194:402.
x Bailit, J.L. (2007). Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care. Ob Gyn Sur.
62:207-213.
x Berkowitz, G.S., Fiarman, G.S., Mojica, M.A., et al. (1989). Effect of physician
characteristics on the cesarean birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 161:146-9.
x California Office of Statewide Hospital Planning and Development. (2006).
Utilization Rates for Selected Medical Procedures in California Hospitals,
Retrieved from the Internet on February 11, 2010 at:
http://www.oshpd.ca.gov/HID/Products/PatDischargeData/ResearchReports/Hos
pIPQualInd/Vol-Util_IndicatorsRpt/2007Util.pdf
x Cleary, R., Beard, R.W., Chapple, J., Coles, J., Griffin, M., & Joffe, M. (1996).
The standard primipara as a basis for inter-unit comparisons of maternity care. Br
J Obstet Gynecol. 103:223-9.
x Coonrod, D.V., Drachman, D., Hobson, P., & Manriquez, M. (2008). Nulliparous
term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level
predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 694-696.
Overview/Details:
([FOXVLYHEUHDVWPLONIHHGLQJGXULQJWKHQHZERUQVHQWLUHKRVSLWDOL]DWLRQ
Rationale:
Exclusive breast milk feeding for the first 6 months of neonatal life has long been the
expressed goal of World Health Organization (WHO) and other authorities of women
and child health care. A recent study substantiates the benefits of exclusively feeding a
newborn infant breast milk.
Patient Settings/Services
Numerator: Newborns that were fed breast milk only since birth
Exclusive breast milk feeding for the first 6 months of neonatal life has long been the
expressed goal of World Health Organization (WHO) and other authorities of women and
child health care. A recent study substantiates the benefits of exclusively feeding
QHZERUQLQIDQWVEUHDVWPLON
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: Newborns that were fed breast milk only since birth
Data elements:
x Exclusive Breast Milk Feeding
Table 11.05
Medical Induction of Labor Codes
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
73.01 INDUCT LABOR-RUPT MEMB
73.1 SURG INDUCT LABOR NEC
73.4 MEDICAL INDUCTION LABOR
Table 11.06
Cesarean Section
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
74.0 CLASSICAL C-SECTION
74.1 LOW CERVICAL SECTION
74.2 EXTRAPERITONEAL C-SECTION
74.4 CESAREAN SECTION NEC
74.99 CESAREAN SECTION NOS
Table 11.07
Conditions Justifying Elective Delivery
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
641.01 PLACENTA PREVIA-DELIVER
641.11 PLACENTA PREV HEM-DELIV
641.21 PREM SEPAR PLACEN-DELIV
641.31 COAG DEF HEMORR-DELIVER
641.81 ANTEPARTUM HEM NEC-DELIV
Pneumonia (PN)
Measure Set
Measure
Code Measure Description
Pneumonia (PN)
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Pneumonia patients, aged 65 and older, who were screened for
pneumococcal vaccine status and were administered the vaccine prior
I-PN-2 to discharge, if indicated
Pneumonia patients, aged 50 and older, who during the flu season,
were screened for influenza vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to
I-PN-7 discharge, if indicated
I-PN 2 Pneumonia patients, aged 65 and older, who were screened for
pneumococcal vaccine status and were administered the vaccine prior to
discharge, if indicated
Overview/Details:
Patients (aged 65 and older) who were diagnosed with pneumonia, and who received
pneumococcal vaccine prior to discharge from the hospital.
Rationale:
Pneumococcal vaccination is indicated for persons 65 years of age and older because it
is up to 75% effective in preventing pneumococcal bacteremia and meningitis. It is also
an important vaccine due to increasing antibiotic resistance among pneumocci.
Patient Settings/Services
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Numerator: Patients with pneumonia, age 65 and older, who were screened for
pneumococcal vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to discharge, if indicated.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative
data and medical records.
Numerator: Patients with pneumonia, age 65 and older, who were screened for
pneumococcal vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to discharge, if indicated.
Data elements:
x Pneumococcal Vaccination Status
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Chest X-ray
x ICD principal or other diagnosis code
I-PN-2
References
Overview/Details:
Smoking cessation advice/counseling given to patients who had pneumonia.
NOTE: For the purposes of this measure, a smoker is defined as someone who has
smoked cigarettes anytime during the year prior to hospital arrival.
Rationale:
Smoking cessation reduces mortality and morbidity in all populations. Patients who
receive even brief smoking-cessation advice from their health care providers are more
likely to quit than those who receive no counseling whatsoever.
Denominator: Pneumonia patients 18 years of age and older with a history of smoking
cigarettes anytime during the year prior to hospital arrival
Reasons and Implications: Smoking cessation may reduce mortality and morbidity in
all populations. Patients who receive even brief smoking-cessation advice from their
health care providers are more likely to quit. Clinical guidelines strongly recommend
smoking cessation counseling for smokers. Hospitalization can be an ideal opportunity
IRUDSDWLHQWWRVWRSVPRNLQJDQGVPRNLQJFHVVDWLRQPD\SURPRWHWKHSDWLHQWV
medical recovery.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Adult Smoking Counseling
Data elements:
x Adult Smoking History
x Birthdate
x ICD Principal Diagnosis Code or Other
x Chest X-ray
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code for
pneumonia as defined in Appendix A, Table 3.1 and a history of smoking cigarettes
anytime during the year prior to hospital arrival
I-PN-4
References
x Fiore MC, Jan CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and
Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health
Service. May 2008.
x HXGPRQ.6+HPEHUJHU..&RUHOOL5/HWDO7KHSKDUPDFLVWVUROHLQ
smoking cessation counseling: perceptions of users of nonprescription
nicotine replacement therapy. J Am Pharm Assoc 2003; 43(5):573-
582.
x Kikano GE, et al: The value of brief, targeted smoking-cessation
advice. Family Practice Management. pp. 50-2000.
x Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueta A, Bartlett JG, Infectious
Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious
Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus
guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in
adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 March 1;44 Suppl 2:S27-72.
x Sheahan SL. How to help older adults quit smoking. Nurse Pract 2002;
27:27-33.
x The Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guideline Panel and Staff:
The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Smoking Cessation
Clinical Practice Guideline. JAMA, 275:1270-1280, 1996.
I-PN 07 Pneumonia patients, aged 50 and older, who during the flu season, were
screened for influenza vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to discharge, if
indicated
Overview/Details:
Patients (aged 50 and older) who were diagnosed with pneumonia (during the flu
season), and who received influenza vaccine prior to discharge from the hospital.
Rationale:
Pneumococcal vaccination is indicated for persons 50 years of age and older because it
is highly effective in preventing influenza-related pneumonia.
Patient Settings/Services
Intensive Care Units
Medical/Surgical units
Numerator: Patients with pneumonia, age 50 and older, who during the flu season,
were screened for influenza vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to discharge, if
indicated.
Denominator: Pneumonia patients 50 years and older (during the flu season)
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Numerator: Patients with pneumonia, age 50 and older, who during the flu season,
were screened for influenza vaccine status and were vaccinated prior to discharge, if
indicated.
Data elements:
x Influenza Vaccination Status
Denominator: Pneumonia patients 50 years of age and older (during the flu season)
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x Chest X-ray
x ICD principal or other diagnosis code
Inclusions to the population: Patients with ICD principal diagnosis code of pneumonia
as defined in Appendix A, Table 3.1 or an other diagnosis code of pneumonia
(Appendix A, Table 3.1)
Table 3.1
Pneumonia (PN)
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
481 PNEUMOCOCCAL PNEUMONIA
482.0 K. PNEUMONIAE PNEUMONIA
482.1 PSEUDOMONAL PNEUMONIA
482.2 H.INFLUENZAE PNEUMONIA
482.30 STREPTOCOCCAL PNEUMN NOS
482.31 PNEUMONIA STRPTOCOCCUS A
482.32 PNEUMONIA STRPTOCOCCUS B
482.39 PNEUMONIA OTH STREP
482.40 STAPHYLOCOCCAL PNEU NOS
482.41 METH SUS PNEUM D/T STAPH
482.42 METH RES PNEU D/T STAPH
482.49 STAPH PNEUMONIA NEC
482.82 PNEUMONIA E COLI
482.83 PNEUMO OTH GRM-NEG BACT
482.84 LEGIONNAIRES' DISEASE
482.89 PNEUMONIA OTH SPCF BACT
482.9 BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA NOS
483.0 PNEU MYCPLSM PNEUMONIAE
483.1 PNEUMONIA D/T CHLAMYDIA
483.8 PNEUMON OTH SPEC ORGNSM
485 BRONCHOPNEUMONIA ORG NOS
486 PNEUMONIA, ORGANISM NOS
Surgical Care
Improvement Project
(SCIP)
Measure Set
Measure
Code Measure Description
Originally developed through a collaborative effort between The Joint Commission and the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (hip arthroplasty) with prophylactic antibiotics initiated within one hour
prior to surgical incision.
Note: Patients who received vancomycin or a fluroquinolone for prophylactic antibiotics should
have the antibiotics initiated within two hours prior to a surgical incision. Due to the longer
infusion time required for vancomycin or a fluroquinolone, it is acceptable to start these
antibiotics within two hours prior to incision time.
Rationale:
A goal of prophylaxis with antibiotics is to establish bactericidal tissue and serum levels
at the time of skin incision. Clinical studies have demonstrated that a common reason
for failure of prophylaxis was delay of antibiotic administration until after the operation.
In a comprehensive study, it was found that the lowest incidence of post-operative
infection was associated with antibiotic administration during the one hour prior to
surgery. The risk of infection increased progressively with greater time intervals
between administration and skin incision. Therefore, opportunities to improve care have
been demonstrated and timely administration has been recommended.
Patient Settings/Services:
Medical/surgical units
Measure Name: Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour prior to surgical
incision for hip arthroplasty.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data and
medical records.
Data elements:
x Anesthesia start date
x Antibiotic administration date
x Antibiotic administration time
x Surgical incision time
Denominator: All selected surgical patients (hip arthroplasty) with no evidence of prior
infection and who are >= 18 years.
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Anesthesia start date
x Antibiotic name
x Antibiotic received
x Antibiotic administration route
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure Code
x Infection prior to anesthesia
x Other surgeries
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code of selected surgeries (as
defined in Appendix A, Table 5.04).
I-SCIP-Inf-1d
References
x Bratzler DW, Houck PM, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers
Group. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the
National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID. 2004:38(15 June):1706-
1715.
x Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247-280.
x Silver A, Eichorn A, Kral J, et al. Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in
selected inpatient surgical procedures. Am J Surg. 1996;171:548-552.
x Larsen RA, Evans RS, Burke JP, et al. Improved perioperative antibiotic use and
reduced surgical wound infections through use of computer decision analysis.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:316-320.
x Finkelstein R, Reinhertz G, Embom A. Surveillance of the use of antibiotic
prophylaxis in surgery. Isr J Med Sci. 1996;32:1093-1097.
x Matuschka PR, Cheadle WG, Burke JD, et al. A new standard of care:
administration of preoperative antibiotics in the operating room. Am Surg.
1997;63:500-503.
x Gorecki P, Schein M, Rucinski JC, et al. Antibiotic administration in patients
undergoing common surgical procedures in a community teaching hospital: the
chaos continues. World J Surg. 1999;23:429-432.
x Bernard HR, Cole WR. The prophylaxis of surgical infections: the effect of
prophylactic antimicrobial drugs on the incidence of infection following potentially
contaminated operations. Surgery. 1964;56:151-157.
x Polk HC, Lopez-Mayor JF. Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of
determinant factors and prevention. Surgery. 1969;66:97-103.
x Stone HH, Hooper CA, Kolb LD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary,
and colonic surgery. Ann Surg. 1976;184:443-452.
x American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on
Practice Bulletins ACOG Practice Bulletin No 104 Antibiotic prophylaxis for
gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol May 2009; 113(5) : 1180-1189.
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (knee arthroplasty) with prophylactic antibiotics initiated within one
hour prior to surgical incision.
Note: Patients who received vancomycin or a fluroquinolone for prophylactic antibiotics should
have the antibiotics initiated within two hours prior to a surgical incision. Due to the longer
infusion time required for vancomycin or a fluroquinolone, it is acceptable to start these
antibiotics within two hours prior to incision time.
Rationale:
A goal of prophylaxis with antibiotics is to establish bactericidal tissue and serum levels
at the time of skin incision.
Patient Settings/Services:
Medical/surgical units
Measure Name: Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour prior to surgical
incision.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data and
medical records.
Data elements:
x Anesthesia start date
x Antibiotic administration date
x Antibiotic administration time
x Surgical incision time
Denominator: All selected surgical patients (knee arthoplasty) with no evidence of prior
infection and who are >= 18 years.
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Anesthesia start date
x Antibiotic name
x Antibiotic received
x Antibiotic administration route
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Infection prior to anesthesia
x Other surgeries
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code of selected surgeries (as
defined in Appendix A, Table 5.05).
x Bratzler DW, Houck PM, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers
Group. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the
National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID. 2004:38(15 June):1706-
1715.
x Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247-280.
x Silver A, Eichorn A, Kral J, et al. Timeliness and use of antibiotic prophylaxis in
selected inpatient surgical procedures. Am J Surg. 1996;171:548-552.
x Larsen RA, Evans RS, Burke JP, et al. Improved perioperative antibiotic use and
reduced surgical wound infections through use of computer decision analysis.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1989;10:316-320.
x Finkelstein R, Reinhertz G, Embom A. Surveillance of the use of antibiotic
prophylaxis in surgery. Isr J Med Sci. 1996;32:1093-1097.
x Matuschka PR, Cheadle WG, Burke JD, et al. A new standard of care:
administration of preoperative antibiotics in the operating room. Am Surg.
1997;63:500-503.
x Gorecki P, Schein M, Rucinski JC, et al. Antibiotic administration in patients
undergoing common surgical procedures in a community teaching hospital: the
chaos continues. World J Surg. 1999;23:429-432.
x Bernard HR, Cole WR. The prophylaxis of surgical infections: the effect of
prophylactic antimicrobial drugs on the incidence of infection following potentially
contaminated operations. Surgery. 1964;56:151-157.
x Polk HC, Lopez-Mayor JF. Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of
determinant factors and prevention. Surgery. 1969;66:97-103.
x Stone HH, Hooper CA, Kolb LD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary,
and colonic surgery. Ann Surg. 1976;184:443-452.
x American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on
Practice Bulletins ACOG Practice Bulletin No 104 Antibiotic prophylaxis for
gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol May 2009; 113(5) : 1180-1189.
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (hip arthroplasty) who received prophylactic antibiotics consistent with
current guidelines.
Rationale: A goal of prophylaxis with antibiotics is to use an agent that is safe, cost-
effective, and has a spectrum of action that covers most of the probable intraoperative
contaminants for the operation. First or second-generation cephalosporins satisfy these
criteria for most operations, although anaerobic coverage is needed for colon surgery.
Measure Name: Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical patients (hip arthroplasty)
Denominator: All selected surgical patients (hip arthroplasty) with no evidence of prior
infection who are >= 18 years.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Data elements:
x Antibiotic Administration Route
x Antibiotic Allergy
x Antibiotic Name
x Vancomycin
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Antibiotic administration date
x Antibiotic administration time
x Antibiotic received
x Antibiotic admission route
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Infection prior to anesthesia
x Surgical Incision time
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code of selected surgeries (as
defined in Appendix A, Table 5.04.)
x Bratzler DW, Houck PM, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers
Group. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the
National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID. 2004:38(15 June):1706-
1715.
x Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247-280.
x American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic guidelines
on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1839-
1888.
x No author listed. The Medical letter. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for Surgery. Med
Lett Drugs Ther. 2009; 82: 47-52.
x Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, et al. Quality standard for antimicrobial
prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:422-427.
x Gilbert DN, Moellering RC Jr., Elipoulos GM, Chamber HF, Saag MS, eds. The
Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2009. 39st ed. Sperryville, VA:
Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc; 2009.
x Itani KMF, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA. Ertapenem
versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2006
Dec 21; 355 (25): 2640-2651.
Page CP, Bohnen JM, Fletcher JR, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical
wounds. Arch Surg. 1993;128:79-88.
x American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on
Practice Bulletins ACOG Practice Bulletin No 104 Antibiotic prophylaxis for
gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol May 2009; 113(5) : 1180-1189.
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (knee arthroplasty) who received prophylactic antibiotics consistent
with current guidelines.
Rationale: A goal of prophylaxis with antibiotics is to use an agent that is safe, cost-
effective, and has a spectrum of action that covers most of the probable intraoperative
contaminants for the operation. First or second-generation cephalosporins satisfy these
criteria for most operations, although anaerobic coverage is needed for colon surgery.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative
data and medical records.
Data elements:
x Antibiotic administration route
x Antibiotic allergy
x Antibiotic name
x Vancomycin
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Antibiotic administration date
x Antibiotic administration time
x Antibiotic Received
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Infection prior to anesthesia
x Surgical Incision time
x Bratzler DW, Houck PM, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers
Group. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the
National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID. 2004:38(15 June):1706-
1715.
x Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247-280.
x American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic guidelines
on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:1839-
1888.
x No author listed. The Medical letter. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for Surgery. Med
Lett Drugs Ther. 2009; 82: 47-52.
x Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, et al. Quality standard for antimicrobial
prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:422-427.
x Gilbert DN, Moellering RC Jr., Elipoulos GM, Chamber HF, Saag MS, eds. The
Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2009. 39st ed. Sperryville, VA:
Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc; 2009.
x Itani KMF, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA. Ertapenem
versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2006
Dec 21; 355 (25): 2640-2651.
Page CP, Bohnen JM, Fletcher JR, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgical
wounds. Arch Surg. 1993;128:79-88.
x American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on
Practice Bulletins ACOG Practice Bulletin No 104 Antibiotic prophylaxis for
gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol May 2009; 113(5) : 1180-1189.
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (hip arthroplasty) whose prophylactic antibiotics were discontinued
within 24 hours after anesthesia end time.
Measure Name: Prophylactic antibiotic discontinued within 24 hours after surgery end
time (hip arthroplasty).
Denominator: All selected surgical patients (hip arthroplasty) with no evidence of prior
infection who are >= 18 years
Reasons and Implications: A goal of prophylaxis with antibiotics is to provide benefit to the
patient with as little risk as possible. It is important to maintain therapeutic serum and tissue
levels throughout the operation. Intraoperative re-dosing may be needed for long
operations. However, administration of antibiotics for more than a few hours after the
incision is closed offers no additional benefit to the surgical patient. Prolonged
administration does increase the risk of Clostridium difficile infection and the development of
antimicrobial resistant pathogens.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Data elements:
x Anesthesia end date
x Anesthesia end time
x Antibiotic administration date
x Antibiotic administration time
Denominator: All selected surgical patients (hip arthroscopy) with no evidence of prior
infection and who are >= 18 years.
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Anesthesia start date
x Antibiotic administration route
x Antibiotic name
x Antibiotic received
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Infection prior to anesthesia
x Other surgeries
x Reason to extend antibiotics
x Surgical incision time
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code of selected surgeries (as
defined in Appendix A, Table 5.04.)
References
x Bratzler DW, Houck PM, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers
Group. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the
National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID. 2004:38(15 June):1706-
1715.
x Crabtree TD, Pelletier SJ, Gleason TG, et al. Clinical characteristics and
antibiotic utilization in surgical patients with Clostridium difficile-associated
diarrhea. Am Surg. 1999;65:507-511.
x Edwards FH, Engelman RM, Houck P, Shahian DM, Bridges CR. The Society of
Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac
surgery, Part I: Duration, 2006. Ann Thoracic Surg 2006; 81: 397-404.
x Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247-280.
x McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, et al. Single- versus multiple-dose
antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systemic review. Aust N Z J Surg.
1988;68:388-396.
x Scher KS. Studies on the duration of antibiotic administration for surgical
prophylaxis. Am Surg. 1997;63:59-62.
I-SCIP-Inf-3e
Prophylactic Antibiotics Discontinued within
24 Hours After Surgery End Time
(Knee Arthroplasty)
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (knee arthroplasty) whose prophylactic antibiotics were discontinued
within 24 hours after anesthesia end time.
Patient Settings/Services:
Medical/surgical units
Measure Name: Prophylactic antibiotic discontinued within 24 hours after surgery end
time (knee arthroplasty)
Reasons and Implications: A goal of prophylaxis with antibiotics is to provide benefit to the
patient with as little risk as possible. It is important to maintain therapeutic serum and tissue
levels throughout the operation. Intraoperative re-dosing may be needed for long operations.
However, administration of antibiotics for more than a few hours after the incision is closed
offers no additional benefit to the surgical patient. Prolonged administration does increase the
risk of Clostridium difficile infection and the development of antimicrobial resistant pathogens.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Data elements:
x Anesthesia End Date
x Anesthesia End Time
x Antibiotic Administration Date
x Antibiotic Administration Time
Denominator: All selected surgical patients (knee arthroplasty) with no evidence of prior
infection and who are >= 18 years.
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Anesthesia start date
x Antibiotic administration route
x Antibiotic name
x Antibiotic received
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Infection prior to anesthesia
x Other surgeries
x Reason to extend antibiotics
x Surgical incision time
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code of selected surgeries (as defined
in Appendix A, Table 5.05)
I-SCIP- Inf-3e
References
x Bratzler DW, Houck PM, for the Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers
Group. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the
National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. CID. 2004:38(15 June):1706-
1715.
x Crabtree TD, Pelletier SJ, Gleason TG, et al. Clinical characteristics and
antibiotic utilization in surgical patients with Clostridium difficile-associated
diarrhea. Am Surg. 1999;65:507-511.
x Edwards FH, Engelman RM, Houck P, Shahian DM, Bridges CR. The Society of
Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac
surgery, Part I: Duration, 2006. Ann Thoracic Surg 2006; 81: 397-404.
x Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guidelines for prevention of surgical
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:247-280.
x McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, et al. Single- versus multiple-dose
antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systemic review. Aust N Z J Surg.
1988;68:388-396.
x Scher KS. Studies on the duration of antibiotic administration for surgical
prophylaxis. Am Surg. 1997;63:59-62.
I-SCIP-VTE-1
Surgical Patients (hip/knee arthroplasty) with Recommended
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Ordered
Measure Overview
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (hip/knee arthroplasty who received venous thromboembolism (VTE)
prophylaxis ordered anytime from hospital arrival to 24 hours after Anesthesia End
Time.
Rationale: Despite the evidence that VTE is one of the most common postoperative
complications and prophylaxis is the most effective strategy to reduce morbidity and
mortality, it is often underused. The frequency of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), that
includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is related to the type and
duration of surgery, patient risk factors, duration and extent of postoperative
immobilization, and use or nonuse of prophylaxis.
Patient Settings/Services:
Medical/surgical units
Denominator: All selected (hip/knee arthoroplasty) patients who are >= 18 years.
Reasons and Implications: Despite the evidence that VTE is one of the most common
postoperative complications and prophylaxis is the most effective strategy to reduce morbidity
and mortality, it is often underused. The frequency of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), that
includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is related to the type and duration of
surgery, patient risk factors, duration and extent of postoperative immobilization, and use or
nonuse of prophylaxis. According to clinical trials, surgery was associated with over a twenty-
fold increase in the odds of being diagnosed with VTE. Studies have shown that appropriately
used thromboprophylaxis has a positive risk/benefit ratio and is cost effective. Prophylaxis
recommendations for this measure are based on clinical practice guidelines.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Denominator: All selected (hip/knee arthoroplasty) patients who are >= 18 years.
Data elements:
x Anesthesia type
x VTE Prophylaxis
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Anesthesia end date
x Anesthesia end time
x Anesthesia start date
x Anesthesia start time
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Preadmission Warfarin
x Reason for Not Administering VTE Prophylaxis
Inclusions to the population: ICD Principal Procedure Code of selected surgeries (as
defined in Appendix A, Table 5.04, 5.05.)
I-SCIP-VTE-1
References
Overview/Details:
Surgical patients (hip/knee arthroplasty) who received appropriate venous
thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis within 24 hours prior to anesthesia start time to 24
hours after anesthesia end time.
Rationale: Despite the evidence that VTE is one of the most common postoperative
complications and prophylaxis is the most effective strategy to reduce morbidity and
mortality, it is often underused. The frequency of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), that
includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is related to the type and
duration of surgery, patient risk factors, duration and extent of postoperative
immobilization, and use or nonuse of prophylaxis. According to a clinical study, surgery
was associated with over a twenty-fold increase in the odds of being diagnosed with
VTE. Studies have shown that appropriately used thromboprophylaxis has a positive
risk/benefit ratio and is cost effective.
Patient Settings/Services:
Medical/surgical units
Denominator: All selected (hip/knee arthroplasty) patients who are > = 18 years.
Data Collection:
Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include administrative data
and medical records.
Denominator: All selected (hip/knee arthroplasty) patients who are >= 18 years.
Data elements:
x Anesthesia type
x VTE Prophylaxis
x VTE Timely
Data elements:
x Admission date
x Anesthesia start date
x Anesthesia start time
x Anesthesia end date
x Anesthesia end time
x Birthdate
x ICD principal diagnosis code
x ICD principal procedure code
x Preadmission warfarin
x Reason for not administering VTE prophylaxis
Su
VTE Prophylaxis Options for Surgery
Surgery Type Recommended Prophylaxis Options
Elective Total Hip
5B Any of the following started within 24 hours of surgery:
Replacement x Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
x Factor Xa Inhibitor (Fondaparinux)
x Warfarin
x Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor (Rivaroxaban)
Elective Total Knee
6B Any of the following:
Replacement x Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
x Factor Xa Inhibitor (Fondaparinux)
x Warfarin
x Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC)
x Venous foot pump (VFP)
x Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor (Rivaroxaban)
Elective Total Hip Any of the following:
Replacement with a x Intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC)
reason for not x Venous foot pump (VFP)
administering
pharmacological
prophylaxis
Appendix A
ICD Codes
Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP)
Please Note : Due to the various ICD Code versions used by different countries,
ICD-8, ICD-9, and ICD-10 spaces have been left intentionally blank. Please fill in
the specific code utilized by your country to correspond to the ICD-9-CM code
description for the following diagnoses.
Table 5.04
Hip Arthroplasty
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
81.51 TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT
81.52 PARTIAL HIP REPLACEMENT
Table 5.05
Knee Arthroplasty
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
81.54 TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT
Table 5.09
Infection Codes
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
Code Shortened Description
001.0 CHOLERA D/T VIB CHOLERAE
001.1 CHOLERA D/T VIB EL TOR
001.9 CHOLERA NOS
002.0 TYPHOID FEVER
002.1 PARATYPHOID FEVER A
002.2 PARATYPHOID FEVER B
002.3 PARATYPHOID FEVER C
002.9 PARATYPHOID FEVER NOS
003.0 SALMONELLA ENTERITIS
003.1 SALMONELLA SEPTICEMIA
003.20 LOCAL SALMONELLA INF NOS
003.21 SALMONELLA MENINGITIS
003.22 SALMONELLA PNEUMONIA
2011 Joint Commission International
206
ICD-8 ICD-9 ICD-10 ICD-9- Shortened Description
Code Code Code CMCode
003.23 SALMONELLA ARTHRITIS
003.24 SALMONELLA OSTEOMYELITIS
003.29 LOCAL SALMONELLA INF NEC
003.8 SALMONELLA INFECTION NEC
003.9 SALMONELLA INFECTION NOS
004.0 SHIGELLA DYSENTERIAE
004.1 SHIGELLA FLEXNERI
004.2 SHIGELLA BOYDII
004.3 SHIGELLA SONNEI
004.8 SHIGELLA INFECTION NEC
004.9 SHIGELLOSIS NOS
006.0 AC AMEBIASIS W/O ABSCESS
006.1 CHR AMEBIASIS W/O ABSCES
006.2 AMEBIC NONDYSENT COLITIS
006.3 AMEBIC LIVER ABSCESS
006.4 AMEBIC LUNG ABSCESS
006.5 AMEBIC BRAIN ABSCESS
006.6 AMEBIC SKIN ULCERATION
006.8 AMEBIC INFECTION NEC
006.9 AMEBIASIS NOS
007.1 GIARDIASIS
008.00 INTEST INFEC E COLI NOS
008.01 INT INF E COLI ENTRPATH
008.02 INT INF E COLI ENTRTOXGN
008.03 INT INF E COLI ENTRNVSV
008.04 INT INF E COLI ENTRHMRG
008.09 INT INF E COLI SPCF NEC
008.1 ARIZONA ENTERITIS
008.2 AEROBACTER ENTERITIS
008.3 PROTEUS ENTERITIS
008.41 STAPHYLOCOCC ENTERITIS
008.42 PSEUDOMONAS ENTERITIS
008.43 INT INFEC CAMPYLOBACTER
008.44 INT INF YRSNIA ENTRCLTCA
008.45 INT INF CLSTRDIUM DFCILE
008.46 INTES INFEC OTH ANEROBES
008.47 INT INF OTH GRM NEG BCTR
008.49 BACTERIAL ENTERITIS NEC
008.5 BACTERIAL ENTERITIS NOS
Venous
Thromboembolism
(VTE) Measure Set
Measure
Code Measure Description
ICU patients who received VTE prophylaxis (or reasons of why this was
not done) on the day of or day after hospital admission or
surgery.<BR>Note: This measure applies to all ICU cases except those
included in the SCIP measure population (knee/hip arthroplasty) who
I-VTE-2 had surgery on the day of or the day after ICU admission or transfer
I-VTE 1 Patients who received VTE prophylaxis (or reasons of why this was not
done) on the day of or day after hospital admission or surgery.
Note: This measure applies to medical and surgical cases that are not included
in the SCIP measure population.
Overview/Details:
VTE prophylaxis given on the day of or the day after hospital admission or surgery or a
reason documented of why VTE prophylaxis was not given.
See Appendix A.
Rationale:
Hospitalized patients at high-risk for VTE may develop an asymptomatic deep vein
thrombosis (DVT), and die from pulmonary embolism (PE) even before the diagnosis is
suspected. Therefore, the best approach is for every patient to be evaluated for primary
prophylaxis since preventing DVT is essential to reducing morbidity and mortality.
There is clinical evidence that appropriately used thromboprophylaxis has a desirable
risk/benefit ratio and is cost effective. Thromboprophylaxis provides an opportunity to
improve patient outcomes and reduce hospital costs.
&RQWLQXLW\ 6WURNH
QPS.3 surgical
(IIHFWLYHQHVV procedures &.D
3UHYHQWLRQ(DUO\ 'LDEHWHV
7UDXPDWLF%UDLQ,QMXU\
+,9$,'6
&DQFHU
7UDQVSODQWDWLRQ
&23'
Reasons and Implications: Hospitalized patients at high-risk for VTE may develop an
asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and die from pulmonary embolism (PE)
even before the diagnosis is suspected. There is clinical evidence that appropriately
used thromboprophylaxis has a desirable risk/benefit ratio and is cost effective.
Thromboprophylaxis provides an opportunity to improve patient outcomes and reduce
hospital costs.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Data elements:
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x ICD diagnosis code
x ICU admission date
x ICU admission/transfer
I-VTE-1
References
x Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell
CW. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. The Eighth ACCP Conference on
antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest. 2008; 133:381S-453S.
x Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism:
the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S.
x Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper JM, et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous
thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. New England Journal of
Medicine. 2005, 352(10), 969-1036.
x Caprini JA, Arcelus JI. State of the art venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
SCOPE on Phlebology & Lymphology 1:2005, 228-240.
x Michota FA. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients. Curr
Opin Cardiol. 2004 Nov;19(6):570-4.
I-VTE 2 ICU patients who received VTE prophylaxis (or reasons of why this was
not done) on the day of or day after hospital admission or surgery.
Note: This measure applies to all ICU cases except those included in the SCIP measure
population (knee/hip arthroplasty) who had surgery on the day of or the day after ICU admission
or transfer.
Overview/Details:
ICU VTE prophylaxis given on the day of or the day after ICU hospital admission or
surgery or a reason documented of why VTE prophylaxis was not given.
See Appendix A.
Rationale:
The vast majority of patients admitted to a critical care unit (CCU) have a major risk
factor for VTE, and many may have multiple risk factors including advanced age,
serious medical illness or recent surgical procedures or trauma. The use of
thromboprophylaxis has been clinically demonstrated to be efficacious in preventing
deep venous thrombosis in these patients.
Denominator: Patients directly admitted or transferred to ICU who are >= 18 years
&RQWLQXLW\ 6WURNH
QPS.3 surgical
(IIHFWLYHQHVV procedures &.'
7UDXPDWLF%DLQ,QMXU\
+,9$,'6
&DQFHU
7UDQVSODQWDWLRQ
&23'
Reasons and Implications: The vast majority of patients admitted to a critical care
unit (CCU) have a major risk factor for VTE, and many may have multiple risk factors
including advanced age, serious medical illness or recent surgical procedures or
trauma. The use of thromboprophylaxis has been clinically demonstrated to be
efficacious in preventing deep venous thrombosis in these patients.
Data Collection: Retrospective data sources for the required data elements include
administrative data and medical records.
Data elements:
Data elements:
x Admission Date
x Birthdate
x ICD diagnosis code
x ICU discharge date
x ICU admission date
x ICU admission or Transfer
x Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell
CW. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. The Eighth ACCP Conference on
antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest. 2008; 133:381S-453S.
x Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism:
the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3 Suppl):338S-400S.
x Attia J, Ray JG, Cook DJ, Douketis J, Ginsberg JS, Geerts WH. Deep vein
thrombosis and its prevention in critically ill adults. Arch Intern Med. 2001 May
28;161(10):1268-79.
x Geerts WH, Selby R. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in the ICU. Chest.
2003 Dec;124(6 Suppl):357S-363S.
Note: This table is not meant to be an inclusive list of all available mechanical
prophylaxis; rather it represents current information available at the time of
publication.
Table 2.3 VTE Parenteral Therapy Table
VTE Prophylaxis Inclusion/Synonyms
Glossary
A
Accreditation
Determination by Joint Commission International (JCI) accrediting body that an eligible
health care organization complies with applicable JCI standards (JCI)
Accreditation process
A continuous process whereby health care organizations are required to demonstrate to
JCI that they are providing safe, high-quality care, as determined by compliance with
JCI standards and International Patient Safety Goals recommendations. The key
component of this process is an on-site evaluation of an organization by JCI surveyors.
(JCI)
Accuracy of data
The extent to which data are free of identifiable errors.
Allowable value
A list of acceptable responses for a data element.
Ambulatory care
2011 Joint Commission International
244
Types of health care services provided to individuals on an outpatient basis.
Ambulatory care services are provided in many settings ranging from freestanding
surgical facilities to cardiac catheterization centers. (JCI)
Antithrombotic Therapy
Pharmacologic agents (oral or parenteral) preventing or interfering with the formation of
a thrombus or blood coagulation.
Appropriateness
7KHGHJUHHWRZKLFKWKHFDUHSURYLGHGLVUHOHYDQWWRWKHSDWLHQWVFOLQLFDOQHHGVJLYHQ
the current state of knowledge
Assisted Fall
A fall in which any staff member (whether nursing service employee or not) was with the
patient and DWWHPSWHGWRPLQLPL]HWKHLPSDFWRIWKHIDOOE\HDVLQJWKHSDWLHQWVGHVFHQW
WRWKHIORRURULQVRPHPDQQHUDWWHPSWLQJWREUHDNWKHSDWLHQWVIDOO$VVLVWLQJWKH
patient back into bed or chair after a fall is not an assisted fall. A fall that is reported to
have been assisted by a family member or visitor also does not count as an assisted
fall.
Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiac arrhythmia characterized by disorganized electrical activity in the atria
accompanied by an irregular ventricular response that is usually rapid. The atria quiver
instead of pumping in an organized fashion, resulting in compromised ventricular filling
and reduced stroke volume. Stasis of left atrial flow increases the risk of stroke.
Atrial Flutter
Type of atrial tachycardia characterized by contraction rates between 230/min and
380/min.
Availability
The degree to which the appropriate care is available to meet the patientVQHHGV
Best practice
Clinical, scientific, or professional technique, method, or process that is recognized by a
majority of professionals in a particular field as more effective at delivering a particular
outcome than any other practice. These practicHVDOVRVRPHWLPHVUHIHUUHGWRDVJRRG
SUDFWLFHRUEHWWHUSUDFWLFHDUHW\SLFDOO\HYLGHQFHEDVHGDQGFRQVHQVXVGULYHQ-&,
Cardiac Module
A set of evidence-based process measures designed to prevent cardiac complications
in surgical patients.
Certification review
An evaluation of a clinical care program to assess its level of compliance with
applicable Joint Commission International standards and to make determination about
its certification status. The evaluation includes assessing documentation, reviewing
performance measurement reports, gathering verbal information, making on-site
observations, and educating and consulting with the program about standards
compliance and performance improvement. (CCPC)
Cesarean Section
Surgical delivery of a fetus through incision in the abdominal wall and the uterine wall,
Does not include removal of the fetus from the abdominal cavity in case of rupture of the
uterus or abdominal pregnancy.
&KLOGUHQV$VWKPD&DUH&$&
Asthma is defined as a lung disorder marked by breathing difficulty, wheezing, or
coughing. For purposes of this measure set, the population is defined as children equal
or greater than 2 through 17 years of age.
Clinical Measures
Measures designed to evaluate the processes or outcomes of care associated with the
delivery of clinical services; may focus on the appropriateness of clinical decision
making and implementation of these decisions; must be condition specific, procedure
specific, or address function of patient care (e.g., medication use, infection control,
patient assessment, etc.)
Contraindication
A factor or condition that may render the administration of a drug or agent or the
performance of a procedure or other practice inadvisable, improper, and/or undesirable.
Continuity
The degree to which the care for the patient is coordinated among practitioners, among
organizations and over time.
Controllers
Controllers are long term control medication for asthma. Controllers reduce airway
inflammation and prevent asthma exacerbations. Inhaled corticosteroids are the
Corticosteroids Any of the hormones produced by the adrenal cortex or their synthetic
equivalents, used to achieve quick relief of asthma exacerbations or long term control of
the swelling, inflammation and mucus production that occurs when the airway are
irritated. Corticosteroids are available in inhaled, topical, oral, and intravenous forms.
Data Collection
The act or process of capturing raw or primary data from a single or number of sources.
$OVRFDOOHGGDWDJDWKHULQJ
Data Element
$GLVFUHWHSLHFHRIGDWDVXFKDVSDWLHQWVGDWHRIELUWKRUSULQFLSDOGLDJQRVLV
Data Quality
The accuracy and completeness of measure data on performance in the context of the
analytical purposes for which they will be used.
Data Source
The data source for specific data elements refers to the primary source document(s)
used for data collection (for example, billing or administrative data, encounter form,
medical records).
Defined measure
A structured measure with defined populations that measures specific events or values;
such as may have numerators and denominators, take the form of a continuous
variable, or result from review questions. (CCPC)
Denominator
The lower portion of a fraction used to calculate a rate, proportion, or ratio. Also the
population for a rate-based measure.
Denominator Specifications
An explanation of the denominator description that consists of included population,
excluded populations, data elements, and corresponding data sources.
Denominator Statement
A statement that depicts the population evaluated by the performance measure.
Denominator Verification
The extent to which the population of interest is identified through data collection.
Discriminatory Capability
The extent to which an indicator demonstrates variation in performance across health
care organizations.
Domains of Performance
$WWULEXWHVRIRUJDQL]DWLRQSHUIRUPDQFHWKDWDUHUHODWHGWRRUJDQL]DWLRQVGRLQJWKHUight
WKLQJVVXFKDVDSSURSULDWHQHVVDYDLODELOLW\DQGHIILFDF\DQGGRLQJWKLQJVZHOOVXFK
as, continuity, effectiveness, efficiency, respect and caring, safety, and timeliness).
Performance domains are definable, measurable and improvable.
'RQRW XVHOLVW
A written catalog of abbreviations, acronyms, and symbols that are not to be used
throughout an organizationwhether handwritten or entered as free text into a
computerdue to their potentially confusing nature. (JCI)
Effective
Evidence-based practice that produces better outcomes than its alternative
Effectiveness
The degree to which care is provided in the correct manner, given the current state of
knowledge, to achieve the desired or projected outcome(s) for the patient.
Efficient
The appropriate use of resources at the least expense to the patient, provider, and care
setting.
Efficiency
The degree to which the care of the patient has been shown to accomplish the desired
or projected outcomes.
Equitable
Care delivered fairly with consideration to need and no other discriminatory factors
Evidence-based practice
Patient care and treatment grounded in science or published clinical studies over a
longitudinal and progressively rigorous empirical evidence. (CCPC)
Face validity
The preliminary expert-based judgment on the usefulness and relevance of a
performance measure for the purpose for which it is intended.
Fall
An unplanned descent to the floor (or extension of the floor, e.g., trash can or other
equipment) with or without injury to the patient.
Focus of indicator
The activity or area that the measure addresses. For example, the focus of an indicator
PLJKWEHPRQLWRULQJSDWLHQWUHVSRQVHRUXULQDU\FDWKHWHUXVDJH
ICD Codes
A two-part classification system in current use for coding patient medical information
used in abstracting systems and for classifying patients. The first part is a
comprehensive list of diseases with corresponding codes compatible with the World
+HDOWK2UJDQL]DWLRQVOLVWRIGLVHDVHFRGHV7KHVHFRQGSDUW contains procedure codes
independent of the disease codes.
Infection module
A set of evidence-based process indicators designed to prevent postoperative infection
in the surgery patient.
International Essentials
7KHILYHDUHDVRIULVNRQZKLFKWRIRFXVLQLWLDOTXDOLW\DQGVDIHW\LPSURYHPHQWHIIRUWV
These five areas were developed from an extensive international literature search on
health care quality and safety. Criteria for each Risk Area provides clear and achievable
risk-reduction strategies. Levels of effort are identified for each criterion to provide a
means for evaluating progress in reducing risk and improving quality.
Measure set
A unique grouping of carefully selected measures, that when reviewed together, provide
DFRPSUHKHQVLYHXQGHUVWDQGLQJRUDVVHVVPHQWRIDXQLWVGHSDUWPHQWVRU
RUJDQL]DWLRQVSHUIRUPDQFH&&3&
Nosocomial Infection
An infection acquired by a patient in a health care organization, especially a hospital.
This infection is not present or incubating before admission to a hospital.
Numerator
The upper portion of a fraction used to calculate a rate, proportion or ratio.
Numerator specifications
An explanation of the numerator description that consists of included populations,
excluded populations, data elements, and corresponding data sources.
Numerator Statement
A statement that depicts the portion of the denominator population that satisfies the
conditions of the performance measure to be an indicator event.
Observed rate
7KHREVHUYHGUDWHLVWKHLQGLFDWRUUDWHWKDWLVEDVHGRQWKHKRVSLWDOVDJJUHJDWHGDWDIRU
a reporting period. This is calculated as the number of indicator numerator cases for
the reporting period divided by the number of denominator cases. Observed rates are
used to measure hospital performances.
Outcome
The result of the performance of a function or a process(es). The effect(s) that an
intervention has on a specific health problem. It reflects the purpose of the intervention.
For example, the outcome(s) or a rural health program on safe drinking water could be
fewer diarrhea episodes in children under five or a decreased child mortality rate by
diarrhea. (JCI)
Outpatient
Generally, persons who do not need the level of care associated with the more
structured environment of an inpatient or a residential program. In many countries,
RXWSDWLHQWFDUHLVDOVRNQRZQDVDPEXODWRU\FDUH,QVRPHFRXQWULHVRXWSDWLHQWVDUH
Parenteral
Not through the alimentary canal but rather by injection through some other route, such
as subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraorbital, intracapsular, intraspinal, intravenous, etc.
Patient Centered
&DUHWKURXJKRXWDSDWLHQWVH[SHULHQFHVKRXOGEHFRRUGLQDWHGDQGJURXQGHGLQ
respectful interactions with care providers that is consistent ZLWKWKHSDWLHQWVYDOXHV
expectations and care decisions.
Patient Days
Conceptually, a patient day is 24 hours, beginning the hour of admission
as measured by daily or period censuses. Facilities should use all data available to
them to represent a complete count of the total number of patients per unit, including
"days" of care provided to short stay patients.
Performance measure
A quantitative tool (for example, rate, ratio, index, percentage) that provides an
LQGLFDWLRQRIDQRUJDQL]DWLRQVSHUIRUPDQFHLQUHODWLRQWRDVSHFLILHGSURFHVVRU
outcome.
Performance measurement
The use of quantitative tools (for example rates, ratios, indices, percentages) to provide
DQLQGLFDWLRQRIDQRUJDQL]DWLRQVSHUIRUPDQFHLQUHODWLRQWRDVSHFLILHGSURFHVVRU
outcome. (CCPC)
Pneumonia (PN)
Pneumonia is defined as an acute infection of the pulmonary parenchyma that is
associated with at least some of the symptoms of acute infection, accompanied by
presence of acute infiltrate on chest radiograph or auscultatory findings consistent with
pneumonia (such as altered breath sounds and/or localized rales.
Pressure Ulcer
A pressure ulcer is localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a
bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear. A
number of contributing or confounding factors are also associated with pressure ulcers;
the significance of these factors is yet to be elucidated.
Prevention/Early Detection
The degree to which appropriate services are provided for promotion preservation, and
restoration of health and for the early detection of disease.
Prophylactic Antibiotic
An antibiotic used to prevent, rather than treat or cure, disease. For the purposed of
SCIP-Inf-1 through 3, antibiotics given to prevent postoperative infection will be
collected. Because the overuse of antibiotics can lead to resistance, antibiotics taken to
prevent infarction should be used only for a short time.
Process measure
A measure used to assess a goal directed, interrelated series of actions, events,
mechanisms or steps. For example, a performance measure describing what is done
to, for or by patients, as in performance of a procedure.
Quality of Care
The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the
likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional
knowledge. Dimensions of performance include the following: patient perspective
issues, safety of the care environment; and accessibility, appropriateness, continuity,
effectiveness, efficacy, efficiency, and timeliness of care.
Quality Improvement
An approach to the continuous study and improvement of the processes of providing
health care services to meet the needs of individuals and others. Synonyms include
continuous quality improvement, continuous improvement, organizationwide
performance improvement, and total quality management. (CCPC)
Rate-based (measure)
An aggregate data measure in which the value of each measurement is expressed as a
proportion or as a ratio. In a proportion, the numerator is expressed as a subset of the
denominator (for example, AMI patients who received aspirin within 24 hours before or
after hospital arrival over all AMI patients). In a ratio, the numerator and denominator
measure different phenomena (for example, the number of patients with central lines
who develop infections divided by the number of central line days).
Reliability
The ability of the indicator to accurately and consistently identify the events it was
designed to identify across multiple health settings.
Relevance
The applicability and/or pertinence of the indicator to its users and customers.
Repeat Fall
More than one fall by the same patient in the same month may be
classified as a repeat fall.
Safe
Delivery of care in a manner that minimizes any risk of harm to the patient.
Safety
The degree to which the risk of an intervention and the risk in the care environment are
reduced for the patient and others, including the health care provider.
Sampling Method
Describes the process used to select a sample. Sampling approaches for national
hospital inpatient quality measures are simple random sampling and systematic
Sample Size
The number of individuals or particular patients included in a study. Usually chosen so
that the study has a particular statistical power of detecting an effect of a particular size.
Seclusion
Seclusion is the involuntary confinement of a patient alone in a room or an area where
the patient is physically prevented from leaving.
Standard
A statement that defines the performance expectations, structures, or processes that
must be in place for an organization to provide safe and high-quality care, treatment,
and service. (JCI)
Standardized measure
A performance measure that has precisely defined specifications, standardized data
collection protocols, meets established evaluation criteria, and can be uniformly adopted
for use. (CCPC)
Stratification
A form of risk adjustment which involves classifying data into strata based on one or
more characteristics, variables, or other categories.
Stratified Measure
A performance measure that is classified into a number of strata to assist in analysis
and interpretation. The overall or un-stratified measure evaluates all of the strata
together. The stratified measure or each stratum consists of a subset of the overall
measure. For example, surgical patients who received a prophylactic antibiotic within
one hour prior to surgical incision is reported as all surgical patients with the appropriate
ICDPrincipal Procedure Code, who received the prophylactic antibiotic within one hour
prior to surgical incision; however, the stratified measure(s) for SCIP-Inf-1 is reported by
the specific ICD Principal Procedure, such as hip arthroplasty (SCIP-Inf-1d).
Stroke (STK)
See definitions for Acute Ischemic Stroke and Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke.
Structure measure
A measure of whether organizational resources and arrangements are in place to
deliver health care (for example, the number of facilities providing a service). (CCPC)
Structure measure
A measure of whether organizational resources and arrangements are in place to
deliver health care (for example, the number of facilities providing a service). (CCPC)
Systemic Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids are hormones produced by the adrenal cortex or their synthetic
equivalents and are administered orally or intravenous. Corticosteroids are used to
achieve quick relief of acute or moderate to severe asthma exacerbations. Oral
corticosteroids are also used for long term control of the swelling, inflammation and
mucus production in the airways. Refer to Appendix C, Table 2.15 for a listing of PN
systemic corticosteroid medications or Table 6.3 for a listing of CAC systemic
corticosteroid medications.
Timely
Care delivery that is prompt and provided without delay to mitigate the risk of harm to a
patient.
Timeliness
The degree to which the care is provided to the patient at the most beneficial or
necessary time.
Type of indicator
$QH[SODQDWLRQRIWKHSHUIRUPDQFHLQGLFDWRUVIRUPDWDVWRLWVVWUXFWXUHSURFHVVRU
outcome.
Vaccine
A vaccine is a suspension of an attenuated (weakened) or killed microorganism, such
as bacteria or virus, administered for the prevention, amelioration, or treatment of
infectious diseases.
Validation
The process by which the integrity and correctness of data are established. Validation
process can occur immediately after a data item is collected or after a complete set of
data are collected.
Validity
Ability to identify opportunities for improvement in the quality of care; demonstration that
the indicator use results in improvements in outcomes and/or quality of care.
Variation
The differences in results obtained in measuring the same event more than once. The
sources of variations can be grouped into two major classes: common causes and
special causes. Too much variation often leads to waste and loss, such as the
occurrence of undesirable patient health outcomes and increased cost of health
services. (JCI)
x Babbie, ER, The Practice of Social Research, 2nd edition, Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1979.
x Disease-Specific Care Certification Manual, 2nd Edition. Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, IL. 2005.
x Everitt, BS, The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Cambridge University Press,
1998.
x Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards for Hospitals, 4th Edition,
Joint Commission International, Aokbrook Terrace, Il 2010.
x Iezonni, LI, Foley, SM, Heeran, T, Daley, J, Duncan, CC, Fisher, ES, Hughes, J,
$0HWKRGIRU6FUHHQLQJWKH4XDOLW\RI+RVSLWDO&DUHUsing Administrative Data:
3UHOLPLQDU\9DOLGDWLRQ5HVXOWVQuality Review Bulletin, November, 1992, 361-
370.
x Lexikon Second Edition, Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 1998.
x McHorney, CA, Kosinski, M, and :DUH-U-(&RPSDULVRQVRIWKH&RVWDQG
Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus
7HOHSKRQH,QWHUYLHZ5HVXOWV)URPD1DWLRQDO6XUYH\Medical Care, 32, (1994),
551-567.
x 0RVE\V'LFWLRQDU\RI0HGLFLQH1XUVLQJ +HDOWK3URfessions, 7th Edition. Mosby
Elsevier, St. Louis, MO. 2006.
x Nichols, T and Earl, L, Basic ICD-9-CM Coding Handbook, Chicago, IL:
American Health Information Management Association, 1992.
x ORYX Technical Implementation Guide, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook
Terrace, Illinois, current.
x 2009 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals; The Joint Commission,
Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, 2008.
x 7DEHUV&\FORSHGLF0HGLFDO'LFWLRQDU\)$'DYLV&RPSDQ\3KLODGHOSKLD3$
1997.