Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alexander Sanchez
Professor Moore
English 1301
21 March 2017
It is evident that there is a common belief among people today to help those in need.
There is a myriad of organizations that any citizen in the United States can donate to, and there
are even companies that vow to donate a pair of shoes or clothing to a poor kid in another
country when a customer buys that same item. On top of that, the U.S. government devotes a
percentage of its federal budget to provide relief and aid to developing countries or countries
facing a crisis, whether it be caused by war, economic recession, or a natural disaster. With so
many organizations, both governmental and non-governmental (NGO), and ordinary people
contributing to the effort of bringing nations out of crisis or poverty, it would make sense that
they make their way to development or stability eventually. What NGOs, government agencies,
and good hearted citizens fail to see, or even discuss, are the negative effects that their
intervention has on its recipients. Effects such as local people making a living off selling basic
necessities such as food or clothing are put out of business, oppressive leaders remain in power,
and newer generations become dependent on donations. Since donors are so oblivious to these
effects, organizations continue to provide help to countries even when it is no longer beneficial
to the recipients. NGOs are able to stay in countries even longer than other federally budgeted or
less funded church organizations because all of their funding comes from donations. The
continuous and unorganized donations and aid by donor entities create dependency on foreign
Sanchez 2
aid, help oppressive leaders remain in power, and encourage non-governmental organizations to
dependency on foreign aid. By providing countries with money or cheap or free food and
clothing, the people become more dependent on it. After a few years of this pattern, people will
completely abandon local products putting local businesses and farmers out of work, which also
reduces the cash flow within that country. Should the aid ever stop coming in, there will be great
demand for the products that were being given to them, such as food and clothes, but since the
outside products put the local products out of business, there will be no one to supply them. For
instance, after the Haiti earthquake in 2010, the whole world came together to provide relief. As
of 2015, 80% of Haitis dependency on grain stocks comes from cheap U.S. imports (Stanford).
Local farmers quit producing rice and the agricultural sector of Haiti became stagnant. The
negative effects of monetary aid are arguably even more detrimental to the development of
countries. One reporter best describes it Unlike loans, which need to be paid back, aid does not
have any requirement for being repaid and thus is far less likely to be utilized efficiently
(Tirmizi). The troubled nations governments receive money and do not spend it wisely and as a
result, the country will continue to need money, donors will continue to supply it, and soon the
recipients will not be able to sustain themselves without these donations. Because of repeated
donations, recipient countries become dependent on aid and make no progress in development.
Foreign aid is also responsible for keeping some tyrant, oppressive, or inept leaders in
power by giving them money. Since aid coming from federal budgets is given directly to
recipient governments for distribution, there is no way of ensuring proper use of aid. James
Peron describes in The Sorry Record of Foreign Aid in Africa how one of Ethiopias past
Sanchez 3
communist military leaders received relief funds which he withheld from areas where his
opponents lived in order to starve them (Peron). Leaders can use relief money to maintain
political power, and not a single penny will be spent on the welfare of citizens. Money is also
used to feed and build the militaries that these dictators used to establish and maintain power.
Another way leaders use money to stay in power is by simply keeping the money for themselves.
Since there is no way for impoverished citizens to revolt or compete against rich leaders,
leadership is passed down to sons who will do the same thing with their sons. These sons will
continue the cycle of letting their people live in horrible conditions while they live luxuriously
off another governments money. In the end, the citizens who were supposed to be helped by the
relief money are instead left in poverty while their leaders use the money to maintain political
entangled in a countrys domestic affairs that they begin to hinder development or relief. In the
wake of the Haiti disaster, NGOs flooded the country and until today have not left. Haiti today
has the most NGOs per capita in the world. This is a major issue when unelected NGOs provide
80% of the countrys services (Edmonds). Because they are unelected and are funded by people
out of the country, there is no way for the people of Haiti to vote for changes in services or even
changes in leadership. These organizations are in charge of rebuilding Haiti, yet are not held
accountable by any citizens, but instead by whoever is funding them. The claims that the strategy
of giving money and free stuff to countries to get them out of poverty is ineffective is supported
by empirical evidence, such as the situation in Haiti. There were about 10,000 NGOs in Haiti
before the 2010 earthquake, and with the amount still lingering around today, the state of Haiti
has not changed (Edmonds). Instead the Haitian government is powerless, the shanty towns (also
Sanchez 4
built and designed by NGOs) that housed thousands of people and were built on the fault line
still lay in ruin, businesses still cannot compete with free or subsidized products being dumped
into the country, and the NGOs in charge of fixing all these things show no signs of changing
policy or strategy. Former Haiti President Michel Martelly voiced the frustrations of all Haitians
when he questioned where all the money given to Haiti went and asked for a better system that
yields results (Lockhart). Evidently, NGOs damage the development of countries when they
Although wanting to help comes with good intentions, generosity without organization or
careful planning can become detrimental to the cause. This is the case when it comes to the
plethora of aid that is provided to countries in poverty or crisis. Instead of boosting a country into
development and stability, foreign aid often creates a nation plagued with issues that are dealt
with by people who are not affected by the countrys conditions. As a result, people get stuck in a
cycle of need and momentary relief because of the uncoordinated and myopic efforts to help
them. These countries will remain in instability and turmoil, and their people in distress, unless
Works Cited
Lockhart, Clare. "Fixing US Foreign Assistance." World Affairs, vol. 176, no. 5, Jan/Feb2014, p.
Peron, James. "The Sorry Record of Foreign Aid in Africa | James Peron." FEE. Foundation for
Stanford, Victoria. "Aid Dependency: The Damage of Donation." This Week in Global Health.
Lockhart, Clare. "Fixing US Foreign Assistance." World Affairs, vol. 176, no. 5, Jan/Feb2014, p.