The Communist Manifesto is an 1848 political pamphlet by
German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels was originally published in London (in the German language as Manifest der kommunistischen Partei) just as the revolutions of 1848 is recognized as one of the world's most influential political manuscripts, presenting an analytical approach to the class struggle and the problems of capitalism and the capitalist mode of production. It summarises Marx and Engels' theories about the nature of society and politics, that "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles". It features their ideas for how the capitalist society of the time would eventually be replaced by socialism, and then finally communism.
MARXISM is a Theory that society evolves through various
stages where the economy and the relationships of different groups within the economy, defined the type of society that evolved e.g.
Communitarian where there was equality among the
community land tribally owned, work distributed, the hunt and harvest shared etc. there was egalitarianism and therefore few distinctions among members. But over time the more powerful groups subjugated others as in enslavement and a system of social stratification developed.
As the economy developed, it needed workers who had
Freedom to move Make decisions Develop a variety of skills
And so the feudal system developed where nobles and
aristocrats (European), protected laborers on their lands in exchange for their lifelong and generational labor, produce and loyalty. Marx showed that societies changed when contradictions and tensions developed in the economy leading to change in social relations between groups. The Industrial Revolution of the 17th & 18th centuries was the catalyst of this movement away from the feudal system.
This period saw the rise of enterprise from traders,
merchants and industrialists, becoming rich from shipping, banking and manufacturing. This was the rise of the new capitalists who bought the lands of the fading nobles, and land ownership was a status affording entry into Parliament and the Legislature (law making). They established laws promoting business and investment and made way for the rise of the middle class. It was the demise of the nobility and the rise of business, manufacturing and heavy industry e.g. iron & steel. Society was divided into
Workers with labor to sell
Capitalists- owners of the means of production e.g. land, capital, factories, banks & businesses
In England in the 19th c, Marx saw capitalism in action. For
it to work there had to be exploitation of workers as they were not paid according to profit but with lowest possible wages. In this, businesses and industrialists were united in efforts to keep wages down as low wages meant high profits. This gave the capitalists a high standard of living and a lifestyle at polarities with their workers.
Contradictions- capitalists need workers to make the
profits and workers need capitalists to provide jobs & wages. But the relationship is by no means harmonious as the capitalists are bent on extracting maximum labor for lowest wages as the worker struggles for better working conditions and wages. Meanwhile the rich get richer and the poor more so poorer.
This gave rise to trade unions agitating for collective
action for better conditions, wages and holding the power to strike. But strikes cannot be maintained for long by workers as the capitalists could recruit scab labor. Marx theorized that the proletariat (the workers) would seek to overthrow the bourgeoisie capitalists to end the society.
SOCIALISM a classless society only made possible where
all members share in the means of production, and understand class positions e.g.
Capitalists a position of oppression of others and
therefore temporal Workers a position of the oppressed so low wages, unfair treatment should not be accepted as the norm.
Only when people see through the FALSE
CONSCIOUSNESS* into which they were socialized, would they see the need for socialism.
*False consciousness - a term stating that the oppressed
often fail to realize that they pave the way of their own oppression by others by adopting the values of the elites. (elites are members of the highest social class or those who rank above others in terms of wealth, status or prestige.)
Socialism refers to the state when institutions are put in
place for everyone to own the wealth of the land, have equal say in government. Once achieved, the way is paved for communism an ideal toward which the newly enlightened people work. Capitalism then, is a stage necessary in the movement towards communism.
COMMUNISM at its most basic, may be explained as an
ideal toward which socialist states are working, where the people, now enlightened, can see the nature of oppression, alienation and hindrances to their sharing in the wealth and governance of their society. We in the Caribbean experienced this oppression and alienation through the colonial experience and its attendant horrors of encomienda, slavery and indentureship in establishing a society stratified in favor of a particular group. Caribbean intellectuals were therefore drawn to Marxist thought.
INFLUENCE IN THE CARIBBEAN
At the end of the 19th century Caribbean thinkers saw
freedom from racial and class oppression by the colonists wrapped up in Marxist thinking e.g. Pan Africanists such as Cyril Briggs, Claude McKay, George Padmore & C.L.R. James, Black power fighters such as Stokely Carmichael and in Negritude activists such as Fanon and Cesaire.
Some actually went beyond thought and applied the
ideology in the governance of their respective territories e.g. Fidel Castro through revolution, Maurice Bishop in a coup detat, Michael Manley via legislation and Cheddi Jagan in Guyana, in the election of a socialist party in 1953, 1957 and 1961, to be stymied by American or British intervention each time.
Neo Marxism
Marxists thinkers who stressed the role of the
superstructure in shaping social life are referred to as neo-Marxists. The superstructure refers to the Marxist concept of describing the social institutions of family, religion and mass media and politics as being heavily influenced by the economy so that the ideas, and values of the elite dominant groups of the economy - the capitalists, pervade.
Through control of the mass media, the police and politics,
the capitalists are able to increase and solidify their control of the society. Their religion is the dominant one, their children go to the elite schools, they put up funding for the political powers.
Their power might not come from physical force but
through the perpetuations of myths among the masses of the people. They suggest through dominant ideas and images in the mass media and other media that a particular race/class cannot attain or own a particular standard of living or the accompanying symbols e.g. a pool, a house in a specific district, a car, and these are held back by the lack of funds in an economy structured to ensure that the wealth is accessed by a small elite. Even the banks that working class people go to for loans to become entrepreneurs act as hindrances with their demand for collateral from the landless and their exorbitant interest rates, banks and lending agencies owned by the already rich elite.
Take a thought walk through Trinidad society and
jot thoughts on the following:
What is the dominant religion of Trinidad society?
Hint check the number of holidays for that particular religion on our calendar What are the elite schools of T&T? What is their particular religion? Who are the richest conglomerate businessmen of Port-of Spain? Who are the main investors of the local banks? Did you know that if you even buy a living room set on hire purchase, that the dominant elite are the financiers? Who owns the daily newspapers and tv stations in T&T? Do you see your future as a worker or an entrepreneur?
The ideas and beliefs of the elite become normalized
through the media, and leading figures in society the clergy, the politicians, the educators and the business community. The sad reality is that the grassroots buys into it and accept these ideologies as the norm and that for someone from the working class to aspire to become affluent or at least acquire the symbols of wealth, they are unrealistic and out of place. To overcome this brainwashing, a new set of ideologies have to replace the old.
The impact on the (Br) Caribbean
Jamaica - 1972 Michael Manley
Guyana Cheddi Jagan and Forbes Burnham Grenada - Maurice Bishop
All these leaders tried to establish a fair and just society.
In Jamaica in the 1970s the Black population felt that the
previous politics had favoured the white middle class who exploited them. Manleys background with the trade union movement made the oppression felt by the Blacks more realistic as he represented many oppressed labourers against capitalist oppression. He set about nationalizing ownership of the shares of the electricity and telephone and transport systems of Jamaica. Marxism proposes that labourers/the proletariat should own the means of production. He placed a 75% levy on bauxite owned by the foreign companies operating in Jamaica to increase the money made in Jamaica/reduce the amount repatriated. He tried to install social justice via the Family Court act, Maternity leave and setting a minimum wage. Grenada with Maurice Bishop
His party the New Jewel Movement tried to remove the
Eric Gairys capitalist rule that upheld colonial politics. He pushed socialist programs that saw the nationalization of banks, transportation and the media. There was legislation concerning labour, education and health improvement. He established international relations with other socialist states such as Cuba and Russia with Cuba giving technical support to build their airport and the opportunity for Grenadian nationalists to study via scholarships to Cuba.
His efforts were thwarted in a violent upheaval in 1982
known as the Grenada Revolution where he was assassinated and the US were called in to assist in quelling the civil unrest. The role of Marxism in the intellectual tradition of the Caribbean is important as it gives a philosophical basis of some leading West Indian thinkers especially C.L.R. James who was born at the end of the 19 th century and the start of the 20th, and a young adult when Cipriani was waging nationalism campaigns against the Crown Colony government in the 1920s. He went to England in 1932 and was one of the most formative writers influencing intellectual development in the 20th century. James is credited as the originator of the modern intellectual tradition in the region, influenced by Hegel, Marx, Trotsky and Lenin in political ideas. Marxism has also influenced many political parties in the region.
Co-operative socialism in Guyana
In the post-independence 1966 Linden Forbes Burnham
adopted a socialist economic development program by amending the constitution to a Co-operative Socialism. This opposed all types of exploitation - social, economic and political. He tried to extend socialist democracy of citizens in the decisions and management of the state.
He nationalized the sugar, bauxite and communication
sectors in order to put resources in the hands of the state and the masses, so that the wealth could be re-distributed through social programs in health and education. The Guyanese government opened ties with the Soviets, Cuba and China, all Marxists.
His efforts though were stymied by a lack of funds and the
debt burden grew forcing them to go to the IMF.
Neo-Marxists
Are those who used Marxs ideas to develop their own
theories to change their societies such as Lenin and Trotsky who established the Soviet Union, Chairman Mao of China, Maurice Bishop of Grenada, Cheddi Jagan and Forbes Burnham of Guyana and Michael Manley of Jamaica, as well as Fidel Castro of Cuba. For some of these Caribbean Marxists, US disapproval and the limited global communist support caucus meant struggling economies and a return to capitalist economics with dependency.