Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Malcolm Campbell
UWRT 1104
4/1/17
Ever since the 1950s the United States have been spending billions on space exploration
missions. In 1958, NASA was established with The National Aeronautics and Space Act by
President Dwight D. Eisenhower. It was created to directly oppose the Soviet Union in space
exploration, shortly after they launched Sputnik. NASA took over the National Advisory
Committee for Aeronautics and was made to be responsible for the civilian space program as
well as aeronautics and aerospace research. It was made distinctively civilian to encourage
peaceful space science rather than for military applications. The founding of NASA kick started
the space race, and would be a major motivator for science funding and space exploration.
NASA is responsible for many achievements in spaceflight and aeronautics. The first main
objective for NASA was to launch a man into orbit. In 1959, NASA took over Project Mercury
and launched Allen Shepard, the first American, into space in 1961, and launched John Glen into
orbit the following year. Since then NASA has continued to break barriers and accomplish
amazing things like, putting 12 men on the moon, help create the International Space Station,
send probes to all the planets and many of their moons and much more (NASA History).
NASA has four major science divisions, earth sciences, planetary sciences, astronomy,
and heliophysics. Earth sciences is a part of NASA that focuses on learning more about our
earth. This part of NASA builds and deploys satellites and other airborne experiments to study
wide verity topics, like ecology, biology, climatology, astrobiology and more (NASA Earth
Science; NASA). A couple of examples of missions is ICESat-II which measures ice levels
around the globe to study the melting of the icecaps, and PACE which will allow the monitoring
of water resources, fisheries management, air quality forecasting, and disaster monitoring
(NASA ICESat-II) (NASA PACE). These missions and dozens of more are planned and
sciences. Recently many conservative congressmen and newly elected president Trump has
expressed desire to defund NASAs earth sciences. They wish to do this because many of them
disagree with scientists on human effects of climate change, and believe NASA is seeking a
political agenda with earth sciences. They also continue this argument by claiming that NASA
Bob Walker, a senior Trump campaign adviser, said there was no need for Nasa to do
see Nasa in an exploration role, in deep space research, Walker told the Guardian.
Earth-centric science is better placed at other agencies where it is their prime mission.
(qtd. in Milman)
The root of this problem is the disagreement over climate change and humans effect on it. More
than 97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists agree climate warming trends over the
past century are extremely likely due to human activities (NASA). Even though almost all
experts agree, and most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide also agree, a large
portion of lawmakers still deny it. 34 percent of congress or 182 members of congress, have
openly denied human effects on the climate. There are two major factors that cause this
disconnect between scientists and lawmakers, lobbyists and echo-chambers. Between the 182
members of congress that deny climate change they have received over $73 million from
lobbyists in oil, coal, and gas companies (Herzog). The other factor is a little less obvious; echo-
chamber might be your Facebook friends. Most people try to engage in conversation with other
people who have very similar values and beliefs. This causes people to repeat information that
one already believes, furthering their belief. These echo chambers cause ones willingness to
consider others opinions to decrease. Ultimately these echo-chambers get to the point where
facts get skewed or denied all together. Echo-chambers amongst some law makers and their
constituents might be the cause of some of the disconnect between them and scientists (Jasny,
Waggle and Fisher). Even if you dont believe in climate change, there are many more benefits
to earth sciences.
One of the major arguments against NASA earth sciences is that NASA should be for
exploration and doesnt need earth sciences. The problem with this argument is that you need
earth sciences to explore. The very first satellite the United States sent into orbit, Explorer 1,
preformed earth science experiments, and proved the existence of the Van Allen radiation belts
around the earth. Knowledge of these radiation belts is critical to modern spacecraft design for
exploration missions. That is just one example of how earth science is applicable to other
sciences.
One of the major goals of NASA and the space industry is the colonization of Mars. To
understand and figure out how to live in an uninhabitable environment we must first understand
the only known habitable place in the universe, earth. The goal of earth science is to understand
earth, and without this understanding of how earth works it would be impossible to try and
understand how other planets and celestial bodies work. Another point is that these studies
should be left for other agencies where earth science is their main focus. The problem with this
is only NASA has the capability and infrastructure to build, launch, and maintain spacecraft.
NASA also shares earth science data with other science agencies like the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Since it was founded in 1958 NASA has spent over a trillion dollars. NASA budget for
fiscal year 2016 is $19.3 billion, which is low compared to the 1966 budget of $43.5 billion
dollars (adjusted for inflation). At its height in 1966 NASAs budget made up 4.41% of the
United States total spending. Since then the budget has decreased with every administration,
except with George H. W. Bush (Data Blog). There are several reasons to why funding has been
cut so much and why some today wish to cut out earth sciences. NASA was founded during the
Cold War shortly after the US army missile division launched Explorer 1. NASAs budget
increased significantly its first few years, due to the start of the space race, and the perceived
national security threat of Soviet space flight. The budget started to decrease after the success of
the Apollo program and with the failure of the Soviets manned lunar program. After the
dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, NASAs budget was only 1% of the USs total spending.
The budget continued to decrease after the end of the cold war (Data Blog). In 2016 NASA had
a budget of $19.3 billion, which made up 0.5% of the USs total spending, and about $1.9 billion
NASAs earth science has many benefits. Most believe that earth sciences pertains only
to climate change. While climate change is a large part of it, it also encompasses weather
prediction, agriculture, and more. NASA helps preform studies on climate change and the earth
in general that others could not do without them. With the use of satellites and high altitude
aircraft NASA is able to study the direct causes of climate change on a global scale. Because of
NASA earth sciences weather prediction has become more accurate and the ability to predict
natural disasters has also increased. Through the use of NASA satellites scientist can predict and
track natural disaster like hurricanes, earthquakes, and forest fires. Agriculture also benefits a lot
from NASA earth sciences. NASA uses satellites to track ground water, this is used to measure
ground water depletion. Ground water depletion can have catastrophic effects on agriculture
around the world. NASA earth sciences research is also critical to the world economy, over a
third of the US economy, $3 trillion a year, is influenced by climate, weather, and natural
hazards, giving economic value to the earth sciences. (NASA Earth Science).
A large benefit of NASA earth sciences and investment in any science is spinoffs. NASA
spinoffs are technology and products that use data, technology and research from NASA
missions and projects. As part of the Freedom of Information Act NASA has created the
Technology Transfer program or T2. This program allows people and businesses to request for
NASA patents, and software (NASA Spinoff). In 2016 alone NASA approved 2632 software
usage agreements and 97 patent license agreements (NASA Spinoff 2016). Spinoffs have led to
commercial products like memory foam, baby food, improved tires, water purification systems
and more. It is estimated that NASAs T2 program could generate up to $1 billion a year.
Spinoffs is not the only way NASA helps the economy, because it is a government agency
NASA uses contractors for all of their projects. All earth science missions are built and launched
by private companies like Orbital ATK, Fibertek Inc., ULA, and more. These companies employ
There is also great educational value to NASA earth sciences. NASA spends around $90
million a year to provide opportunities for educators, learners and institutions, mainly in the
STEM fields. The goals of NASAs education program are to strengthening NASA and the
Nation's future workforce, attracting and retaining students in science, technology, engineering
and mathematics, or STEM, disciplines, and engaging Americans in NASA's mission. They
accomplish this with their 50 plus educational programs. These programs range from K-8 Space
camps to undergraduate/graduate level internships NASA earth sciences help this educational
effort by creating tools for educators and funding research grants for colleges and universities
(NASA Education).
NASA earth science is critical the space program, the economy, education, and more.
Defunding earth sciences could spell disaster and it should not only continue to be funded, but its
budget should increase. Investments in any science, no matter the discipline has large, long
lasting, benefits, and outweighs any downsides. Political opposition to NASA earth science is
unfounded, and results from ignorance and opportunity for political gain.
Works Cited
Data Blog. Nasa budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958. 2015.
2017. <https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/feb/01/nasa-
budgets-us-spending-space-travel#data>.
Herzog, Katie. Surprise! A third of Congress members are climate change
deniers. Grist, 8 March 2016. News Article.
Jasny, Lorien, Joseph Waggle and Dana R. Fisher. "An empirical examination
of echo chambers in USclimate policy networks." Nature Climate
Change Vol 5 (2015): 782-786.
Jr., Frank Morring. "Can Commercial Smallsats Help NASA's Earth Science
Program?" Aviation Week & Space Technology (2016): 1.
Milman, Oliver. Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on
politicized science. New York: The Guardian, 23 11 2016. News Article.
NASA. A Breif History of NASA. n.d. 25 March 2017.
<https://history.nasa.gov/factsheet.htm>.
. Earth Science. n.d. 2017.
<https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/index.html>.
. Education. n.d. 2017.
<https://www.nasa.gov/offices/education/about/index.html>.
. ICESat-II. n.d. 2017. <https://icesat-2.gsfc.nasa.gov/>.
. NASA. n.d. 2017. <NASA.gov>.
. "NASA FY 2016 BUDGET REQUEST ." 2016. NASA.gov. 2017.
<https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/Agency_Fact_Sheet_FY_2
016.pdf>.
. "NASA FY 2017 BUDGET REQUEST." 2017. NASA.gov. 2017.
<https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fy_2017_nasa_age
ncy_fact_sheet.pdf>.
. NASA Spinof. n.d. 2017. <https://spinoff.nasa.gov/>.
. PACE. n.d. 2017. <https://pace.gsfc.nasa.gov/>.
. "Spinoff 2016." 2016. NASA.gov. 2017.
<https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2016/pdf/Spinoff2016.pdf>.