Megan Dyer

Professor Padgett

English 102

04/11/17

The Importance of Energy Efficiency: Humans Need Reach for Net-Zero to Save the Earth Commented [PA1]: Great academic-y title!

Energy practices have become front and center in the minds of many people around the

world. Anywhere that one looks for appliances, energy ratings will be seen. Even with this

energy information presented there is an opposing side that has reviewers commenting

negatively on the product due to harm on the environment from low energy efficiency. Even Commented [PA2]: Dont forget your hyphenations.

though people are so concerned with energy ratings and reviews, few care enough to take action

to reduce their own energy emissions. Some may not be taking action because they just do not

think there is any better options than the way they are living, but that is not true. People need to

be educated energy and net-zero emissions. Energy emissions can have large negative effects on Commented [PA3]: Theres a missing word in there
somewhere.
the environment, including air pollution. For instance, energy waste can release pollutants into

the air that cause pollution such as smog and it also can release greenhouse gases which

contribute to global warming (Cars, Trucks, and Air Pollution). In 2012, Americans were

surveyed on how much they worry about environmental problems. From the chart below you can

see that the biggest proportion of people, thirty-six percent, agree air pollution is a big problem

and worry a great deal. Thirty five percent worry a fair amount and twenty-two percent worry at Commented [PA4]: hyphens!

least a little. That is, 93% of people are worrying at some level about air pollution, yet it would

be hard to believe 93% of people are doing the most they can to reduce their own energy
Commented [PA5]: Ha! I think this is a good point here.
emissions (Gallup). But it is hard to believe that anyone is doing the most of
anything.
 Air Pollution

22 36

35

% Great deal % Fair amount % Only a little % Not at all

This made me start thinking about my own life and all the many ways that not only I use energy,
but also how others around me us it. Due to these thoughts, I began asking myself; Is it truly
possible to waste zero energy? and after conducting research it has been proven that it is
possible to not waste it. Several people are working towards achieving net-zero building around
the world. Because the engineering and construction industries have been working tirelessly to
Commented [PA6]: So the data from this chart is from
Gallup? Try to make this clear in someway. You could
include a textbox as a caption just below the chart.
Commented [PA7]: Also, its important to point out that
air pollution is a slightly different conversation from global
warming. They are for sure related, but they are a bit
different. The good news is that people tend to be much
more responsive to air pollution as an issue as compared to
global warming because it more immediately and directly
affects them.

make advances through various net-zero geared practices in residential and commercial

buildings, we see improvements in some areas but there are some issues faced in making these

practices a commonplace which tells us that it is up to fellow builders, engineers, and

homeowners to overcome the issues by following some simple guidelines.

In order to make net-zero common practice, people have to understand why it is

important to reduce energy emissions. At UN climate negotiations, scientists discussed climate

change and how quickly people need to reach net-zero energy emissions before the damage to

the environment is irreversible. Experts weighed in at the conference but with varying levels of

urgency, Climate hawks say it should be met as early as 2050. Others see a few more decades of

wiggle room, but they too emphasize the need for rapid action. (Cushman). Many doubters,

particularly proponents of big oil, say this goal is too unreasonable and that it will take more time Commented [PA8]: Of course they do. Gotta make that
$$$!
than just a few decades. Experts at the climate negotiations disagreed greatly. Advisors for Shell

even agree that there needs to be a movement towards cleaner and more energy efficient energy Commented [PA9]: Repetition.

sources. If a big oil company is in support of something that could potentially harm their

business, it shows just how important reaching net-zero really is. (Cushman)

Working examples of net-zero construction have already been created. For example,

nineteen affordable net-zero energy homes were built in Hawaii in 2011. Hawaii is notorious for

very high energy prices so this project was constructed as an experiment to find ways to combat

these prices. The homes are all one or two stories and around fifteen hundred square feet. One of

the most important factors of these homes is that they are built in a hot area with low winds,

making it more difficult than normal to obtain enough renewable energy to not only supply

normal household needs but also cool a house in an above average temperature zone. Each house

has been monitored since their construction to measure their performance. In the first year, the

homes performed within one percent of net-zero. This above zero average occurred because most

homes performed above net-zero and only a few performed below. (Norton) This sort of

feedback is crucial in future planning of homes. The systems used in these homes can be

evaluated on their efficiency and used for future projects. Not all homes will be able to apply to

these practices though. Results will largely depend on the tenants. Larger families that require

larger square footage will use more energy. This does not discount the fact that these are still

ground breaking experiments. These homes will largely impact the construction of residential

homes and could greatly decrease energy usage worldwide. After perfecting the homes with what

is most efficient, the homes will be easily replicable to be built in large, module neighborhoods.

Once on wide scale production, they would become more cost affordable and would be able to
be afforded by those who otherwise could not afford utilities. Not only has this been done with Commented [PA10]: The word afford is really getting a
workout in this sentence.
residential buildings, net-zero construction has been successful in commercial buildings.

An office building in Seattle Washington was built in compliance with the Living

Building Challenge. The living building challenge is the toughest set of standards regarding eco-

friendly buildings. The founder of the Living Building Challenge said in regard to the Seattle Commented [PA11]: This is really interesting!

office building, Washington is the least sunny state in the United States, and this building is still

able to obtain 100 percent solar which shows just how incredible the construction of this

building is. It defeats the odds and is able to be top of its class in energy efficiency. It is

important to note that this is a commercial building and with all of its energy efficient

considerations included, only cost the developers one-fifth above average costs of an office

building of its class (Thomas). Like the homes in Hawaii, the building can serve as a model for

construction in the future. Again, it will not always be possible to be completely net-zero like

this building is. This office complex has no parking lot in order to encourage people to ride bikes

and walk, but in rural areas where people travel far distances to work this would not work.

Regardless, it is still a building at the top of its class and therefor a model for how to

significantly reduce energy use and waste.

You are most probably wondering, how are these net-zero building created? There are so

many different aspects that have to be considered. In the office building in Seattle, one of the

proudest spotlights of the buildings design is the staircase. It was built in a spiral with a giant

hanging chandelier over top which sparkles the light that flows in from the full glass walls. The

idea behind the staircase is that it was designed so beautifully people will avoid the elevator and

take the stairs just to be able to experience walking up it, and apparently, it works. Another

aspect of the buildings design is that it is made entirely of glass. No artificially lighting is needed Commented [PA12]: This doesnt need to be an adverb.
inside the building since it is designed so that the sunlight coming in from the glass walls lights

the building all the way to its center. The toilets of the building are not hooked up to the citys

sewer. Instead, the toilets are composting toilets which compost waste to produce agricultural

grade compost. The attention to detail throughout this office space is what makes it known as the

Worlds Greenest Office Building (Thomas). Of course, there were many other factors

considered in its construction, but these were some of the biggest. These do not take into account

the biggest component of energy use though, the HVAC system. Commented [PA13]: Good point, and Ill bet the efficacy
of such a system varies by region.

Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems account for eighty-five to

ninety-five percent of the energy expended in any given building according to the Mark Lentz,

the author of Achieving Net Zero Require Innovative Thinking (Lentz). HVAC systems control

the environment of the room by cooling it, heating it, and controlling the humidity through the

movement and distribution of air inside the room. Just like how there are different models of

cars, there are different models of HVAC systems. Not only are they made for different sizes and

different speeds of changing temperatures, but they are also made to different energy efficiency

standards, some more lenient than others (Servicechamps). With HVAC systems taking up such

a high percentage of energy, they are crucial in replacing in order to ever achieve net-zero. Lentz

believes that with new processes most of that waste can be eliminated or recycled. A study was

done at West High School replacing their HVAC system and energy usage was cut by seventy

percent. HVAC engineers currently model and rate their system by comparing the results to the
worst possible outcome, meaning even poor performance can receive a good score (Lentz). In
Commented [PA14]: Really sounds like some serious
innovation is in need and usually new innovations are super
expensive until they are available to (and demanded by) a
whole way lot of people.

net-zero buildings, this sort of engineering is considered inefficient and engineers are using

better systems. Models need to be tested against the best possible outcome so that energy

efficient practices are constantly better themselves by being challenged against higher and higher
standards. The sort of technology used in creating efficient HVAC systems include

evaporation/condensation/freezing/thawing, air-to-air heat-exchange, and thermal and electric

storage (Lentz). HVAC systems often are used for long periods of time and so it is up to

homeowners to start making the transition to more energy efficient systems.

It is clear that making net-zero structures is possible, there are still many problems

associated with achieving net-zero. Although the technology is out there, the real barriers

imposed on technological progress are those we impose ourselves (Lentz). The number one step

before net-zero energy efficiency is reached, is to overcome the obstacle of people. People are so

accustomed to their lifestyles, and the energy they use, that they do not want to make a change.

Also, most people do not even realize just how serious and damaging wasteful energy use is.

Once we run out of energy sources such as petroleum, it is gone for a long time. There is no

current way to make more which is why it is so important not to waste energy. It is also

damaging. For instance, when humans burn coal or emit gas exhaust from their car the earths Commented [PA15]: Dont neglect your commas.

atmosphere gets polluted and there is no way to clean it up (Umbra). Switching to a net-zero

lifestyle would decrease these wasteful and damaging ways humans currently live. A lifestyle

change is not the only reason people do not

Is Envirornmental Protection
want to switch to net-zero. In 2014, a
Worth the Cost?
survey was done asking Americans if they 80
Percent Agree/Disagree

70
60
support environmental protection despite 50
40
30
20
any costs. The results, pictured to the right, 10
0

were compiled based on political affiliation Commented [PA16]: Where does the data come from?
Also, these results are unsurprising but this is a great
chart! I think it makes an important point about the political
but overall, only fifty-sex percent agree
quagmire were in. most people see this as a worthwhile
Classification
and pressing issue, but, roughly 50% of the political parties
that stricter environmental laws are worth that run our country dont have this at the top of their
Agree Disagree agenda. It is quite frustrating.
the cost. Thirty nine percent disagreed, stating that stricter environmental laws cost jobs and hurt

the economy (Drake). For every mining or oil rig job lost though, another will be created for a

solar panel installer or a wind turbine builder. People need a change in mindset through

education and through training individuals for jobs that produce renewable energy sources that

can achieve net-zero lifestyles.

Another problem in reaching net-zero comes from the construction industry, especially in

the case of high-rise, multi-unit residential buildings (MURBs). The current building practices

and codes create many constraints on those trying to build greener structures. Many of the codes

currently in place, and even the ones that were made with the intention of greater energy

efficiency, are impractical and leave room for loose interpretations. Builders of MURBs are

being allowed to take short cuts which undermine the energy efficiency standards. This problem

can be overcome. Through modules and cost-benefit analysis, options to decrease energy waste

have been discovered (Cianfrone). These options need to be made into strict codes with more

thorough enforcement through inspections.

There is also the problem of how all the renewable energy practices that the world is

currently striving to implement will hold up in future climates. We all know the damage we our
doing to our atmosphere can cause warming climates, but it can also cause more extreme weather
and more frequent storms. A study was done on how current wind and solar energy systems will
do in ten different possible future climate zones. The zones were created based on Global
Commented [PA17]: This raises questions about your
audience. Not everyone holds this (incredibility obvious
fact) to be true. So be mindful of the stratedgy youre
employing here, and also, you want to show that you are
well-informed on this issue. Suggesting that we all know
might imply that you are unaware of the complicated
political problems surround this issue (that wasnt political
twenty years ago). Also, your chart above explicitly says that
we all dont think this is a worthwhile issue.

Climate Models predictions. In half of the climate zones, the renewable energy sources lost their

capability to achieve net-zero. Like the other current problems that are faced while trying to

reach net-zero, this has a solution as well. Photovoltaic systems can be used to overcome this

obstacle. Photovoltaic systems account for hourly building energy loads and therefore are better
predictors for future climates. When tested against future climate zones, these systems show

stability. This is ground breaking technology that will allow for renewable energy sources to be

used consistently throughout the future, without the worry of having to constantly replace and

upgrade the sources. Beside this technology which now allows for long tern wind and solar

energy use, there are also other sources of energy, such as nuclear energy, which would be able

to withstand despite climate variations (Shen and Noam).

Clearly, net-zero construction is possible. It has been proved in both residential and

commercial building. It requires attention to detail in the structure, appliances, and design.

Various components are needed to make energy-efficiency possible, and keeping an eye on big

energy spenders such as HVAC systems. Although there are problems that are still being faced,

these problems do have solutions. Humans are the biggest problem faced by net-zero. It takes a

change of mindset in people. Humans all around the world need to start planning for the future

and take action to combat the energy crisis. Big media outlets need to become a source of

advocacy to educate the public on not only the damage current energy usage is causing, but also

the solutions to correct it. Secondly, lawmakers all of the world need to come together to better

the construction energy. Unless, construction stops taking short cuts and starts using better Commented [PA18]: This sentence isnt clear to me.
Commented [PA19]: What do you mean by short-cuts?
practices, net-zero will never be reached. There needs to be tougher building codes and more Ive been construing your argument to mean constructing
energy efficient homes. What do you mean by short-cuts?
thorough regulation to ensure that they are followed. It may cost a bigger price up front, but Do you mean in the actual act of constructing (bulldozers,
and whatnot) or do you mean simply building cheaper
homes that use more energy? Vs building expensive homes
energy efficient building will pay off in the end by allowing tenants to not have to rely on utility that use less energy?
Commented [PA20]: That would ultimately be way
companies. Besides, construction companies are usually large and have substantial backing so expensive, right? But like way way expensive, such that
people might not be able to afford those loans and a part of
the money is there to pay up front. Buyers will still be able to afford it because they will still get the housing market would take quite the hit, right?
Commented [PA21]: Who is paying this money?
loans like normal and without utility bills they will be able to pay more each month to cover the Commented [PA22]: Well, it would be a matter of
qualifying for those loans. Its easier to qualify for small
bigger loan. Lastly, engineers need to be working to create modules and products that do not just loans than bigger ones.
satisfy the current needs, but the future needs as well. The technology is there, so now the

initiative of homeowners, engineers, constructors, and law makers is responsible for making sure

the advances that have been made become widescale and influential on the public.

Megan,

I really like what youve composed here. I think youve made a good case about how net-

zero is certainly possible and that there is a need and desire for it. It seems to me that you are

predominantly making a policy change. The difficulty here is that such a policy is quite difficult

to implement and there are a lot of complex moving parts. My suggestion might be to make a

quality claim instead, since you are really pointing out the exigency of this problem and peoples

desire to see these changes be implemented. Your biggest problems (for a policy claim) are

mostly that oil lobbies have a lot of pull and that the government needs to intervene via

regulations and credits to allow such a new economy to grow, but that, as are most things in

politics, super complicated. So while I like what you have going here, the kind of claim youre

making seems just a bit too out of reach with what youve built here. Id say to think about the

quality/value of this, maybe you are attempting to persuade lawmakers to get off their butts and

push for change, and the onus for the specific of that change should be on them, if that makes

sense.
 Citations

"Cars, Trucks, and Air Pollution." Union of Concerned Scientists. N.p., 5 Dec. 2014. Web. 11

Apr. 2017. <http://www.ucsusa.org/clean-vehicles/vehicles-air-pollution-and-human-

health/cars-trucks-air-pollution#.WO19vIgrJPY>.

Cianfrone, Christian, et al. "Holistic Approach to Achieving Low-Energy, High-Rise Residential

Buildings." Journal of Building Physics, vol. 39, no. 6, May 2016, pp. 522-541.

EBSCOhost, doi:10.1177/1744259115623262.

Drake, Bruce. "How Americans view the top energy and environmental issues." Pew Research

Center. N.p., 15 Jan. 2015. Web. 11 Apr. 2017. <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-

tank/2015/01/15/environment-energy-2/>.

Gallup, Inc. "Worry About U.S. Water, Air Pollution at Historical Lows." Gallup.com. N.p., 13

Apr. 2012. Web. 11 Apr. 2017. <http://www.gallup.com/poll/153875/worry-water-air-

pollution-historical-lows.aspx>.

John H. Cushman Jr., InsideClimate News, Phil McKenna, Sabrina Shankman, Nicholas

Kusnetz, Zahra Hirji, and John H. Cushman Jr. "Is 'Net-Zero' Carbon Goal to Rescue the

Climate Plausible?" Inside Climate News. N.p., 20 Feb. 2015. Web. 28 Feb. 2017.

LENTZ, MARK S. "Achieving Net Zero Requires Innovative Thinking." Heating/Piping/Air

Conditioning Engineering, vol. 83, no. 9, Sept. 2011, pp. 10-13. EBSCOhost,

login.pallas2.tcl.sc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db

=a9h&AN=66893138&site=ehost-live.
Norton, Paul, et al. "Evaluation of Model Results and Measured Performance of Net-Zero

Energy Homes in Hawaii." ASHRAE Transactions, vol. 119, no. 2, May 2013, pp. 1-8.

EBSCOhost,login.pallas2.tcl.sc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dir

ect=true&db=a9h&AN=96045853&site=ehost-live.

Servicechamps. "What Is An HVAC System? | Service Champions." What Is An HVAC System

Comments. Service Champions, 9 Nov. 2015. Web. 11 Apr. 2017.

<https://www.servicechampions.net/what-is-an-hvac-system/>.

Shen, Pengyuan and Noam Lior. "Vulnerability to Climate Change Impacts of Present

Renewable Energy Systems Designed for Achieving Net-Zero Energy

Buildings." Energy, vol. 114, Nov. 2016, pp. 1288-1305. EBSCOhost,

doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.078.

Thomas, Samantha. ""World's Greenest Office Building" Makes Net-Zero Look Easy." YES!

Magazine. N.p., 19 Jan. 2015. Web. 28 Feb. 2017.

<http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/world-s-greenest-office-building-makes-net-zero-

look-easy>.

Umbra, Ask. "Umbra on why we shouldnt waste energy." Grist. N.p., 08 Sept. 2005. Web. 11

Apr. 2017. <http://grist.org/article/school2/>.