Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decision-making framework
This document is called the A Framework for Risk Related Decision Support, and was
introduced by UKOOA in 1999.
We start with the right side where we see the context to the decision - what we know and
what are the drivers.
We start in section A where we have the risks we have experience in handling and we
finish in section C, where we have no experience with and there are many uncertainties.
Once you know where you sit, you draw a horizontal line across and each of these areas
within the centre gives an indication as to the percentage that should be driving your
decision. For example if you draw a line across, you establish that your decision is in the
middle of the 'A' band and so, 50% of your risk assessment process should be making sure
you understand codes and standards, 25-30% of your risk assessment process should
ensure that you're looking at good practices and that you're complying with them and
25% is engineering judgment.
The left side illustrates the methods /means of which we can verify/check the decisions
that we make.
Course summary developed by Michelle McIntyre on behalf of Oil and Gas Fundamentals Oil and Gas Fundamentals 2012
THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF AN ONLINE TRAINING COURSE FOUND AT WWW.OILANDGASFUNDAMENTALS.COM.
IT IS FOR THE REVIEW OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS ONLY AND IS NOT FOR DISSEMINATION COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS APPLY
The Fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management
Online Training Series Course Summary
Frequency estimation
Frequency estimations can be gathered from the following:
Publicly and commercially available Historical data e.g. Leak rates, hole sizes,
ignition probabilities, etc
Fault Tree Analysis, and Event Tree Analysis both which are more complex and
goes into more detail about how to manage a particular even and they're widely
used in the nuclear and oil and gas industry
Course summary developed by Michelle McIntyre on behalf of Oil and Gas Fundamentals Oil and Gas Fundamentals 2012
THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF AN ONLINE TRAINING COURSE FOUND AT WWW.OILANDGASFUNDAMENTALS.COM.
IT IS FOR THE REVIEW OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS ONLY AND IS NOT FOR DISSEMINATION COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS APPLY
The Fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management
Online Training Series Course Summary
Purpose:
FTA: To identify causes of hazardous events (top down), or of hardware systems
and human error.
ETA: To analyze various outcomes (e.g. fire, un-ignited spill, explosion) of a
hazardous event, including consideration of escalation paths. ETA is essential part
of Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA); FTA generally only applied in oil and gas
industry for analysis of complex safeguarding systems.
Typical inputs:
System / facility equipment drawings / PFDs.
Equipment failure data and event data.
Typical outputs:
FTA: Frequency of hazardous event (the top event). Logic diagram illustrating
combinations of events which can lead to top event.
ETA: Frequency of event outcomes, given occurrence of an initiating event.
Diagram illustrating escalation of initiating event (time sequence), through various
success / failure states of safeguards, to discrete event outcomes.
Typical software: FT+, Risk Spectrum, Fault Tree & Event Tree
Course summary developed by Michelle McIntyre on behalf of Oil and Gas Fundamentals Oil and Gas Fundamentals 2012
THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF AN ONLINE TRAINING COURSE FOUND AT WWW.OILANDGASFUNDAMENTALS.COM.
IT IS FOR THE REVIEW OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS ONLY AND IS NOT FOR DISSEMINATION COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS APPLY
The Fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management
Online Training Series Course Summary
Acceptance criteria
Risk levels may be quantitative and/or qualitative
Course summary developed by Michelle McIntyre on behalf of Oil and Gas Fundamentals Oil and Gas Fundamentals 2012
THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF AN ONLINE TRAINING COURSE FOUND AT WWW.OILANDGASFUNDAMENTALS.COM.
IT IS FOR THE REVIEW OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS ONLY AND IS NOT FOR DISSEMINATION COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS APPLY
The Fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management
Online Training Series Course Summary
Tolerable risk?
All reasonably foreseeable risks over which exercise control or mitigation
If we can say whether or not that we can live with a certain level of risk is dictated by either
semi-quantitative risk matrix or numerical target as illustrated by those tools.
In other words, the risk is tolerable if its ALARP.
ALARP assessment
In this process, we should have some sort of process that helps in improving on the controls
that already exist:
Identify potential risk reduction measures
Improvements on existing controls
Additional controls - could we put an extra barrier in place between the release
of the hazard and unwanted event?
When we have identified these additional controls, then we compare the benefit
and sacrifice
Depth of assessment should be proportional
Qualitative
Semi-quantitative
Cost Benefit Analysis
Rigour will depend on e.g.
Nature of hazard
Extent of risk
Societal concerns etc.
When we're evaluating the benefit and the sacrifice, the more uncertainty we've
got and the bigger the level of risk - the wider the effect is on society.
The more systematic the approach, the more rigorous and transparent it is to
stakeholders so the better we can document this, the better we can assure
ourselves that we're doing the best job we practicably can and also better we can
assure the stakeholders that we are doing the best job as reasonably practicable.
Qualitative
Can we think of any risk reduction measures?
Is it cost effective Y/N?
It is a very simple and straightforward method. But the downside of it is that it may be
difficult to audit whether or not a wide range of things were considered in making these
decisions.
However it can be increased by moving into a semi-quantitative approach.
Course summary developed by Michelle McIntyre on behalf of Oil and Gas Fundamentals Oil and Gas Fundamentals 2012
THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF AN ONLINE TRAINING COURSE FOUND AT WWW.OILANDGASFUNDAMENTALS.COM.
IT IS FOR THE REVIEW OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS ONLY AND IS NOT FOR DISSEMINATION COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS APPLY
The Fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management
Online Training Series Course Summary
Semi-quantitative - matrices
This method allows for more consistent and transparent decision making.
Documentation
Documentation is important for this entire process.
Responsibility of the duty holder to show that they've documented all risks. Better quality of documentation
- better demonstration to the shareholders that its a more appropriate control of the risks
Allows for communication, audit, discussion etc.
Depth proportional to the issue
Consider:
What are the issues?
What is the level of risk?
Options considered
Benefit vs Sacrifice
Rationale for rejection
Actions (timescales, responsibilities etc.) for implementation
Adequate documentation an assists you to make better informed decisions.
Course summary developed by Michelle McIntyre on behalf of Oil and Gas Fundamentals Oil and Gas Fundamentals 2012
THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF AN ONLINE TRAINING COURSE FOUND AT WWW.OILANDGASFUNDAMENTALS.COM.
IT IS FOR THE REVIEW OF COURSE PARTICIPANTS ONLY AND IS NOT FOR DISSEMINATION COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS APPLY