Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Charles Supp
Adam Padgett
ENGL 102
2/27/2016
Racial Discrimination in the Workplace: Whats Really Going On and How to Fix It
Inquiry: How prominent is race based discrimination in the American workplace and what are its Commented [PA1]: Dont forget your hyphens.
Commented [PA2]: its is already possessive. No need for
consequences? the apostrophe.
Proposed Thesis: Race based discrimination in the American workplace is still highly prominent despite
the overall appearance of improved race relations and it can lead to a wide variety of social and individual
consequences; because of this, change must be made to the general structure of how the American Commented [PA3]: What kind of change?
workplace is based.
Microaggressions among Professional African American Men in the American Workplace. Proc.
Dr. Anah gave a presentation at the Massachusetts Counseling Associations psychology conference in
2016 that examined the experiences and consequences of racial microaggressions among high achieving
African American professional men in the workplace. The conference is held annually to review strategies
for combating various microaggressions and stereotypes and how they can harm the social environment of
the United States. Dr. Anah has a doctorate in psychology so he can be considered an expert in this field.
He conducted a survey type study first hand to determine if any workplace racism had occurred in their Commented [PA4]: You dont really need type study
here.
experiences. This source provides current data and graphs of the data so it would be valuable to use as a
Supp 2
source in my paper. This source is credible but not all that authoritative so I would only be able to use it
Avery, Derek P., Patrick F. McKay, and David C. Wilson. "What Are the Odds? How Demographic
This source examined the effects of demographics and demographic similarity on the prevalence of sex-
and race/ethnicity-based perceived workplace discrimination. The survey conducted for this source was
cinducted over a large group of randomized people so the overall method of research is reliable. The Commented [PA5]: conducted?
results were published in the Journal of Applied Psychology in 2008 so it is relatively current and it is
also peer reviewed. This source is reliable and authoritative so I am able to use it as a primary argument in
my paper. This source also discusses perceived race-based discrimination among people of different races
so it would be good to analyze in my paper how people of different races may feel differently about how Commented [PA6]: I like the analysis you offer at the end
here, but I would like to see you engage with the source.
much race based discrimination is actually going on. What are your thoughts? How does this sources thesis
intersect with your thesis?
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241 (1964). Commented [PA7]: This annotation is pulled straight from
this website:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the nation's premier civil rights legislation. The Act outlawed <https://www.nps.gov/subjects/civilrights/1964-civil-rights-
act.htm>
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, required equal access to public
places and employment, and enforced desegregation of schools and the right to vote. It did not end
discrimination, but it did open the door to further progress. The Civil Rights Act has been the basis for
multiple Supreme Court cases since 1964. Along with using the Civil Rights Act as a source I can also
use various court cases as well. All of these sources are primary and reliable sources so they would be
good to use in my final paper. The Civil Rights Act outlaws workplace discrimination but discrimination
Supp 3
still continues, so I would want to look at potential flaws in the act and how these can be resolved so that
Hirsch, Afua. "Workplace Racism Is on the Rise." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 10 Nov.
Hirsch describes how workplace racism is on the rise in her article for the Guardian. She argues that
although blatant racism has decreased, subtle racism and microaggressions have increased in the
workplace. Subtle racism is on the rise she says because it is harder to identify and it is harder for people
to realize they are doing it, but to those that it affects it is more obvious than ever. Hirsch has had a long
career in writing, broadcasting, and human rights development so she can be considered a reliable author.
The Guardian is a reliable publisher as well. Hirsch wrote this article about discrimination in Britain so
Vega, Tanzina. "Working While Brown: What Discrimination Looks like Now." CNNMoney. Cable News
Tanzina Vega is a digital correspondent for CNNMoney where she covers race and inequality in America.
Prior to working at CNN, Vega was a staff reporter for The New York Times where she created and
covered a beat on race and ethnicity for the national desk, reported on digital media and advertising for Commented [PA8]: Also this is pulled straight from this
website: <http://money.cnn.com/author/tanzina-vega>
the business desk and covered the New York City courts for the metro section. She is a reliable author Further, this annotation doesnt discuss the source at all.
because she is an expert in her field and has been published by multiple reliable databases. Her article for
CNN Money discusses how discrimination has changed with the times and how it has evolved through the
workplace. The article was published in 2015 so it is current which adds to reliability. This source would
Wingfield, Adia Harvey. "Being Black-but Not Too Black-in the Workplace." The Atlantic. Atlantic
Adia Harvey Wingfield is a professor of psychology at the University of Georgia so she can be considered
in expert in her field. Her article for The Atlantic was written in 2015 so it is current. It discusses how
being black in the American workplace brings along special kinds of social and individual stresses that
going beyond actually being discriminated. This means that workers are stressed about how they are
perceived based on past discrimination regardless of whether they are currently discriminated against.
This article would provide a good background and a good secondary argument for my paper. Since it was
Charles,
Theres some interesting stuff here in terms of your projects general direction. Im not getting a
clear sense of what you will be arguing exactly or how these different sources are
supporting a singular argument, and you only have one peer-reviewed source here.
Lastly, you have some instances of plagiarism here. You have to be vigilant about what
you cite and where you get it from. The two biggest instances of unattributed borrowing
in your annotations come from sources not mentioned in your citations, which makes this
plagiarism a bit more egregious. Even if you are simply offering someones bio, you
cant copy and paste it, word-for-word without attribution. Ive highlighted the two
biggest instances, and as a result, I have to dock you point. You need to be super careful
here. If you have questions on plagiarism, feel free to talk to me about it. Also, other
professors might come down a bit harder for this kind of plagiarism, so it is doubly