Professional Documents
Culture Documents
415-423, 1996
Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0301-679X/96/$15.00 +O.OO
0301-679X( 95)00097-6
Notation
Test procedures
The experiments were carried out at nominal sliding
speeds ranging from 0.2 m/s to 8 m/s. The loads
ranged from 9.8 to 392 N to yield an apparent contact 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
pressure ranging from 0.55 to 22 MPa. The duration Timefmin)
of each test depended upon the rubbing materials, the
speed and the load. Each test was conducted as long
as the thermal condition or the wear rate reached a Fig 2 Variation in temperature of the specimens with
steady state condition, unless the wear rate was too rubbing time for a 6061 aluminium alloy disc sliding
high either causing the pin to be shortened too fast on a die steel pin at 1 mls and 2.2 MPa. T,,: temperature
or to making the rubbed track on the disc wear too at apparent contact area of the pin; Td: mean surface
deep; in such situations, the test was terminated. temperature of disc; T,, T2: measured temperature on
the pin
Temperature calculation
the air. Moreover, the diameter of the pin is less than
According to Archard, the greater part of frictional its length. Therefore, one-dimensional heat conduction
heat is supplied to the moving specimen at high sliding is assumed. From heat conduction in a one-dimensional
speeds. This is not true in the pin-on-disc configuration condition, the energy balance between any two cross-
while the pin is rotating, because the bulk temperature sections of area A separated by a small axial distance
of the disc is much lower than that of the pin, and dx of a cylinder is given as:
most of the frictional heat will be supplied to the
stationary disc. On the other hand, by measurement $ KA ; - h&(T - T,) = 0
of temperatures at the stationary pin and the rotating i i
(1)
disc, both temperatures increase with increasing rub-
bing time (Fig 2), where To is the temperature at the where K is the thermal conductivity of the pin material,
apparent contact surface of the pin computed with the h the convection heat-transfer coefficient, C, is the
method described later. The temperature of the circumference of the pin, and T, is room temperature.
stationary pin is always higher than that of the rotating If the thermal conductivity and convection heat-
disc. Moreover, the mean temperature at the apparent transfer coefficient are assumed to be constant and
contact surface is found to be different from that equal to the average values, respectively, the general
predicted by Ashby et al. 6,7. The discrepancy is caused solution for Eq. (1) is
by the different bulk temperatures of the pin and the T = T, + C, exp(mx) + Cz exp( -mx) (2)
disc, which Ashby et al. did not take into consideration.
where
A modified calculation of the mean surface temperature
at the apparent contact area is proposed as follows.
(3)
If a natural convection condition is assumed for the
stationary pin, the heat conducted away from the If the temperatures at any two positions of the pin,
clamped end of the pin dominates that convected by T, and T,, are measured, the constants C, and C2 can
(4)
if the pin is stationary.
The mean temperature at the apparent contact area,
TO is found to be:
T,, = T, + C1 + C, (5)
The heat flow Q,, transferred to the pin is: I
0 015 I 1.k 1
Q,, = K AmC2 - K AmC, (6)
P (MW
The flash temperature T, at the real contact area A,
can be obtained by the energy balance in the contact Fig 3 Computed results for temperature of rubbing
zone of the pin and is: pairs made from medium carbon steel at a constant
sliding speed of 4 mls against different apparent contact
T, = To + !@E (7) pressure p, MPa. T,: flash temperature based on
KOA, the hardness of the rubbed material at the required
where KO is the thermal conductivity of the material temperature T,; TL: flash temperature based on hardness
in the contact area or of the oxide film; Ii is the at room temperature
average height of surface asperities or the thickness
of the oxide film. If oxide film can hardly be found Temperature of the disc
on the contact surface of the pin, I, is given by the
mean peak-to-valley height, R,(DIN), measured with The bulk temperature of the disc is always neglected
a profiling type proficorder. The real contact area is by many investigators, but this temperature does affect
difficult to determine12, but the usual calculation can the rate and mechanism of wear of the rubbing bodies.
be employed as follows. Figure 4a indicates the wear loss of the discs made of
410 stainless steel sliding on a stationary pin made of
A, = -F (8) die steel. One of the discs was cooled by a water
H jacket, while the other experienced natural heat
transfer, and all other conditions were the same in
where F is the normal load, and H is the smaller of the tests. As the temperature rose to a certain level
the hardness numbers of the two contacting specimens
in the latter condition (Fig 4b), the wear rate of the
at the flash temperature. H can be replaced by the
disc increased suddenly. Although the wear rate in
value of 3~7r,,where af is the flow stress of the specimen
the cooled condition was quite steady, the wear loss
at the flash temperature. Therefore:
was heavier. This was caused by the lower contact
temperature in the water-jacket-cooled condition,
Tc = To + -%Q
F K. I p which inhibited the pin from forming oxides. In the
natural heat-transfer case, as the temperature of the
To determine T,, one should assume a value for T, disc rose the disc was softened, allowing heavier wear
at first, then, obtain H at the assumed T, from the loss.
published data elsewhere13*14, and compute the result
on the right-hand-side of Eq. (9). If the computed Because of sharing the same interface, the flash
temperature of the rubbing bodies should be the same,
result is equal to the assumed T,, then T, is the
while the mean surface temperature at the apparent
required flash temperature. Although the shear strain
rate on the real contact asperities may be very high, contact area of the two contacting bodies may be
it has little effect on the flow stress of the material under different from each other and should be computed
separately. The temperature at any position on the
compression because of the anisotropic behaviour in
plastic deformation. This is because the planes that rubbing track but outside the current apparent contact
suffer frictional shearing are different from the planes area of the disc will be much lower than the mean
that are subjected to maximum shear stress due to temperature inside the current contact zone. The mean
normal compression. However, for more accurate surface temperature at the current apparent contact
calculation, the normal load F can be replaced by the area is:
resultant load obtained from the normal and frictional Qci=Hv-Qp-Q (10)
forces.
where Qd is the heat flow supplied to the disc, Q is
Figure 3 indicates typical results for the flash tempera- the rate of energy for creating new surfaces and for
ture computed with Eq. (9). The flash temperatures accelerating the debris. But Q is difficult to determine
based on the hardness at room temperature are also and is therefore neglected. Neglecting Q causes the
shown for comparison. computed result for the flash and mean surface
PI8 Triboloav International Volume 29 Number 5 1996
Characteristics of wear results by pin-on-disc: H. So
when the speed of the pin is higher than 0.2 m/s, the
heat convected to the atmosphere increases with
increasing speed. Consequently, the temperature of
the pin and the disc is lower in the arrangement with
a rotating pin than for a stationary pin. This affects
the wear behaviour of the pin remarkably as shown
in Fig 5, which indicates the wear appearance of a
rotating pin and a stationary pin subjected to an
apparent contact pressure of 5.5 MPa and at a sliding
speed of 4 m/s. The stationary pin has a mushroom
shape at the rubbing end. This implies that the
temperature of the stationary pin was much higher
than that of the rotating pin subjected to the same
load and speed. The high temperature softened the
stationary pin. By comparing the colours of the pin
surface, the temperature distribution of a rotating pin
at the end of a test can be estimated. The mean
1000 surface temperatures at the apparent contact area of
Slide Distance (m) some tested pins are listed in Table 2 in which the
average temperatures on the rubbing track of the
600 mating discs are also shown.
Wear rate
FL-J
negligible.
Fig 5 Comparison of wear appearance between the rubbed surfaces of pin specimens in different arrangements.
Left: stationary pin; right: rotating pin made of high carbon steel (Hv = 210) rubbed with medium carbon steel
discs (Hv = 160) at 4 mls and 5.5 MPa
Table 2 Mean surface temperature fC) at apparent contact area measured at a sliding distance of
1200 m, sliding speed 2 m/s and contact pressure 5.5 MPa
i i 6 10
Sliding distance(103m)
0
Fig 7 Wear loss, W of a 4140 steel pin (Hv = 970)
rubbing against a 4340 steel disc (H, = 750) at 2 mls 0 50 100 150
and 2.5 M-Pa Slide Distance(m)
1000
T
z
;E
a,
100 I
E 10
3mls
1.75
1.50 1
f ,2mls
0 I /
OC0 2 4 6 0
P (MW
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Fig 11 Variation in wear rate with apparent pressure p Time (min)
for different materials rubbed with AISI 4340 disc. HC,
high carbon steel pin (Hv = 800) at 4 m/s; DS, die 400
steel pin, (Hv = 600) at 2 mls; ST, MC pin laser
cladded with stellite (H., = 650) at 4 m/s
350- 3mls
300-
9
; 250-
5
0.8 2 200-
t
a& 150- 1 mls
k
loo-
0 I 1 1 , I 6 I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
0.2 Time(min)
Fig 13 (a) Variation in friction coefficient with rubbing
0.0 speed of die steel pin sliding on stationary discs made
of 6061 aluminium alloy under a contact pressure of
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 2.2 MPa; (b) variation in bulk temperature of alu-
Slide Distance (m) minium discs with the speed of die steel pin correspond-
ing to Fig 13(a)
Fig 12 Comparison offriction coefficients between rotat-
ing pin and stationary pin corresponding to Fig 8 and
Table 2: (O), stationary HC pin; (*), stationary MC and stationary pins. This is caused by different
pin; (O), rotating HC pin; (El), rotating MC pin heat-transfer conditions occurring in the two
arrangements.
(2) A more accurate prediction of flash temperature
plastic zone size. The increases in plastic zone size
and mean surface temperature at the apparent
and real contact area hinder the rubbing motion.
contact area can be achieved with the calculation
Consequently, the friction coefficient increases with
proposed in the paper in accordance with the
increasing sliding speed. measurement of temperature on the stationary
pin.
Conclusions (3) The increase in bulk temperatures of the rubbing
bodies decreases the flow stresses of the rubbing
Some important conclusions can be drawn in accord- materials to a certain extent, which results in an
ance with the wear tests conducted with a pin-on-disc increase in the plastic zone size in the sub-
configuration. surfaces of the rubbing bodies. Consequently,
(1) The wear mechanism, friction coefficient and the friction coefficient as well as wear rate
bulk temperature of the rubbing bodies are increases with increasing sliding speed when the
different between the arrangements with rotating normal load is over certain levels.
422 Tribology International Volume 29 Number 5 1996
Characteristics of wear results by pin-on-disc: H. So
(4) In order to avoid ambiguity in the presented 5. Archard, J.F. The temperature of rubbing surfaces. Wear 19581
59, 2, 438-455
results from the pin-on-disc configuration, it is
sensible to point out the arrangement for the pin 6. Ashby M.F., Abulawi J. and Kong H.S. Temperature maps for
and the disc, and whether a steady state condition frictional heating in dry sliding. STLE Tribol. Trans. 1991, 34,
577-587
is reached, and if not, how long the sliding
distance is. Moreover, the use of a dimensionless 7. Lim, S.C. and Ashby M.F. Wear-mechanism maps. Acta MetaN.
1987, 35, l-24
wear rate is preferable.
8. Ettles, C.M.McC. The thermal control of friction at high sliding
speeds. ASME Trans. J. Tribol. 1986, 108, 98-104
Acknowledgements 9. Marscher W.D. A critical evaluation of the flash-temperature
The author wishes to thank H. M. Chen, Y. A. Chen, concept. ASLE Trans. 1982, 25, 157-174
W. S. Jean, C. T. Chen, and C. H. Chen for their 10. Lingard S. Estimation of flash temperature in dry sliding. Proc.
assistance in the experiments. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 1984, 198C, 8. 91-97
11. Quinn T.F.J. Review of oxidational wear, Part I: The origins
of oxidational wear. Tribol. lnt. 1983, 16, 257-271
References
12. So H. and Liu D.C. An elastic-plastic model for the contact of
1. Blok H. Surface temperature under extreme pressure lubricating anisotropic rough surfaces. Wear 1991, 146, 201-218
conditions. Proc. Second World Petr. Cong. 1937, 3, 471-484
2. Block H. Measurement of temperature flashes on gear teeth 13. Baragar D.L. The high temperature and high strain rate
under extreme pressure conditions. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. behaviours of a plain carbon and an HSLA steel. J. Mech.
1937, 2, 14-20 Work. Technol. 1987, 14, 295-307
3. Jaeger, J.C. Moving sources of heat and the temperatures at 14. Lange, K. Handbook of Metal Forming, McGraw-Hill, 1985,
sliding contacts. Proc. Roy. Sot. N.S.W. 1942, 26, 203-224 4.1-4.18
4. Barber, J.R. Distribution of heat between sliding surfaces. J. 15. So H. The mechanism of oxidational wear. Wear 1995. 184,
Mech. Eng. Sci. 1967. 9, 351-354 161-167