Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Joshuas birth name was Hoshea (Heb. lit. salvation, Num. 13:8), but Moses called him Joshua
(Heb. yehoshua, lit. the Lord saves; Num. 13:16). Jesus is the Greek form of the Hebrew Joshua.
While parts of the book appear to be written after Joshuas death (Josh. 10:12, 13; 24:2933), tradition
identifies Joshua as the primary author of the work. Assuming that Joshua and his fellow spy Caleb
were of similar age when they were part of the original spy mission to Canaan 40 years earlier,
Joshua would have been about 80 years old when the Israelites entered the Promised Land.
AUTHOR
Joshua was divinely prepared to lead the Israelites (see chart, Preparation for Leadership). He
had been a slave, a free man, a man without a country, the general of an ill-equipped nomadic
army, a conqueror against incredible odds, a land agent, a statesman, and a settler. He witnessed
extraordinary miracles: the 10 plagues of Egypt, the parting of the Red Sea and the Jordan River, the
miraculous provision of food for 40 years in the wilderness, water flowing from rocks, city walls
falling down, the sun standing still, and army after army falling away at his approach.
DATE
The Book of Joshua covers approximately 30 years during what is now called the Late Bronze
Age (15001200b.c.). The actual invasion probably occurred about 1405b.c. during the reign of
Amenhotep III in Egypt (see Deut. 1:38; 1Kin. 6:1).
BACKGROUND
Setting
The first five books of the Bible (the Pentateuch) provide background for the Book of Joshua. The
peoples preparation began in Genesis with the promise of the land to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
(Gen. 12:13, 7; 13:15; 15:7, 18; 17:8; 26:3; 28:13). Preparation continued, as for two centuries Abrahams
descendants lived in the land but never fully controlled it.
For the next four centuries the Israelites lived in Egypt. The Book of Exodus records their escape from
slavery and the giving of the Law. Leviticus prepares them for worship. Numbers and Deuteronomy
provide for them a civic structure. Even the language in Joshuas account detailing Israels entry
Although the Law and Israels special covenant relationship with God defined the nations identity,
God also had promised the Israelites a land of their own. The Book of Joshua is the record of their
conquest of that land under Gods leadership. Canaan, the strategic land bridge connecting Africa
with Asia and ultimately with Europe, is a unique land (see chart, Terminology for the Land). It links
the Indian Ocean (via the Red Sea) with the Atlantic Ocean (via the Mediterranean). It claims more
military occupations, battles, and blood baths than any country on the globe; at least 30world
powers have trampled its soil. People living in this land need a special relationship with their
defender.
The Promised Land was a pagan land. Though God had placed a witness to Himself in the land with
the election of Abraham and his descendants as His chosen people, the people of Canaan persisted
in the worship of numerous gods and goddesses. By the time of the conquest, the religious climate
of Canaan had grown so decadent that a variety of detestable practices expressly forbidden to the
Israelites, including cult prostitution and child sacrifice, had evolved (Lev.18:21; Deut. 12:31; 23:17).
Egypt, the political Goliath of the day, showed little concern. Other political powers had waned, and
Canaans own native inhabitants lacked unity. The timing for the Israelite invasion was perfect.
Purpose
The book is a reminder to the Israelites, including future generations, that their land was a gift
from God and that their possession of the land was the fulfillment of His promise. What began as a
promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and continued through Moses now would be fulfilled under
Joshua.
The faithfulness of Joshuas generation would be tested in battle. Greater tests would come,
however, as future generations changed from the nomadic life of herdsmen to a new life as
permanent settlers.
THEMES
Though Joshua is a history book, its primary theme is the faithfulness of God as exhibited repeatedly
through His presence, power, protection, provision, and fulfilled promises. A secondary theme is the
faithfulness of Gods people. The Israelites were about to enter an advanced culture of experienced
farmers whose life was tied elaborately to the worship of pagan gods of nature; those gods would
be a constant temptation to the Israelites. Their willingness to obey God would be tested, and many
times they failed the test. Yet Gods faithfulness never ceased.
1:1 The Israelites had been at the border of the Promised Land the god of that region. God used the same formula (Law, Josh.
40 years earlier (Num. 13:114:45), at which time the people 1:7, 8; Land, v.2; Himself, vv.5, 9).
had doubted that God could accomplish His promises. They 1:6 Repetition was typically used by the Hebrews for empha-
refused to enter Canaan, and their disobedience resulted in sis, with the threefold repetition as the highest degree (vv.6,
Gods judgment (see chart, Tale of Two Committees). None of 7, 9; see also Is. 6:3; John 21:1517). Gods renewed promise to
the adults except Joshua and Caleb were allowed to enter the
guide Joshua not only through the conquest but also through
land (Josh. 5:6; see chart, Caleb: Portrait of a Hero). The death
the distribution of the land followed (Josh. 1321; see map, The
of Moses completed this judgment. God was ready to lead the
Division of the Land).
Israelites into the land as He had promised. Joshuas position
as assistant indicates a unique position of personal service, 1:8 The command to meditate on Gods Law (the Torah) in-
and thus the new leader of Israel began with a direct commu- cluded incorporating its teachings into ones lifestyle as the
nication from the Lord (see chart, Preparation for Leadership). basis of true success in life.
1:2 The crossing of the Jordan was considered the first step 1:1215 The Reubenites, the Gadites, and half the tribe of
of the campaign (Deut. 32:47; Josh. 3:1013). Although normal- Manasseh already had claimed and settled the land east of the
ly not very wide this close to Jericho, at flood stage the river Jordan with the understanding that they would fight alongside
could have been a mile wide. their brothers until the rest of the land was conquered. This
1:3 Treading upon the soil symbolized acceptance of prop- commitment was important for the unity of the nation and
erty ownership (Deut. 11:24; Josh. 14:9); handing your shoe to demonstrated the faith of these tribes that God would provide
another symbolized the transfer of land (Ruth 4:7, note). The for and protect those left behind while the fighting men were
transaction bound the new owners to the law, the land, and away (Num. 34:14, 15).
Joshua was born in slavery and oppression (Ex. 1:13). He was among those who cried out to
EARLY YEARS
God for deliverance (Ex. 2:23).
Joshua observed the plagues (Ex. 7:1412:29). He saw the impotency of Egypts gods
THE EXODUS (Ex.7:1013). He observed Pharaohs humiliation (Ex. 8:810). He witnessed the miraculous
provision of God (Num. 11:3133).
Joshua was the leader of a tribe (Num. 13:2, 8, 16). He stood for God at the risk of his own life
LEADERSHIP
(Num. 14:610). Though in the minority, he wholly followed God (Num. 32:11, 12). He co-led
TRAINING
the people (Num. 27:1823). He led battles (Ex. 17:9, 10).
Moses delegated authority (Ex.18:1726). He encountered God on Mt. Sinai (Ex. 24:12,
OBSERVATION OF 13). He experienced the rebellion of the people (Num. 12:115; 16:150). He responded
MOSES to complaining (Ex. 17:17). He experienced frustration at the disobedience of the people
(Ex.16:2530). He obeyed God (Ex. 40:1619).
Joshua received the book written by Moses (Ex. 17:14). He shared authority with Moses
TEACHING BY MOSES
(Num.27:1823). Moses gave instructions to Joshua (Josh. 1:7).
OBSERVATIONS Joshua learned patience (40 years waiting to get into the land). He learned to seek
OF JOSHUAS God (Num.27:1518). He learned to obey only God (Num. 14:8, 9). He learned to lead
PREPARATION (Num.27:1823).
God told Moses that Joshua was the new leader (Num. 27:1523). God told Joshua that he was
GODS CALL the new leader (Josh 1:19). God showed the people Joshua was the leader (Josh. 3:7). God
personally appeared to Joshua (Josh. 5:1315).
Joshua would possess every place his foot would tread (Josh. 1:3). God would be with
GODS SPECIFIC
Joshua as He was with Moses (Josh. 1:5, 9). No one would be able to usurp Joshuas position
PROMISES
(Josh. 1:5). Joshua would prosper (Josh. 1:7).
Be strong and courageous (Josh. 1:6, 9). Observe all Moses commands (Josh. 1:7, 13).
GODS INSTRUCTIONS
Meditate on the Book day and night (Josh. 1:8). Do not be afraid (Josh. 1:9).
The people accepted him as Moses replacement (Josh. 1:16, 17). They gave him their
PUBLIC AFFIRMATION
allegiance (Josh. 1:18). Leaders (priests) responded to him (Josh. 3:817; 4:1618).
Joshua acted quickly (Josh. 3:1). He sent only two spies, and they reported to him (Josh. 2:1,
23). He relayed Gods promises to the people (Josh. 3:5, 8). He set up memorials (Josh. 4:19).
JOSHUAS
He recognized and worshiped the real Commander (Josh. 5:1315). He made mistakes (Josh.
LEADERSHIP
7:19). He experienced Gods direct involvement (Josh. 10:14). He administered the division
of land (Josh. 1319).
Joshua practiced immediate obedience (Josh. 11:23). He learned from the past (Josh. 10:25).
EVALUATIONS He held to Gods Word (Josh. 8:34, 35). He taught the people the importance of Gods Word
OF JOSHUAS (Josh. 23:6). He read Gods Word to the people (Josh. 8:35). In victory, he praised God
LEADERSHIP (Josh. 8:30). He recognized that God fulfilled every need (Josh. 23:14). He continually gave
God the credit (Josh. 3:5, 10; 4:23, 24; 23:3). He made a lifelong commitment (Josh. 24:15).
gave you on this side of the Jordan toward you. Only the Lord your God be with you,
the sunrise. as He was with Moses. 18Whoever rebels
16So they answered Joshua, saying, All against your command and does not heed
that you command us we will do, and wher- your words, in all that you command him,
ever you send us we will go. 17Just as we shall be put to death. Only be strong and of
heeded Moses in all things, so we will heed good courage.
Identification: The spies were named by Moses. The spies were chosen by Joshua.
Report: The enemy is bigger than we are. God is bigger than any enemy.
Action Taken: The people reacted in fear. The people acted in faith.
Rahab Hides theSpies shut, when it was dark, that the men went
out. Where the men went I do not know;
2 ow Joshua the son of Nun sent out two
N
men from Acacia Grovea to spy secretly,
saying, Go, view the land, especially Jericho.
pursue them quickly, for you may overtake
them. 6(But she had brought them up to
So they went, and came to the house of a the roof and hidden them with the stalks of
harlot named Rahab, and lodged there. 2And flax, which she had laid in order on the roof.)
7Then the men pursued them by the road to
it was told the king of Jericho, saying, Be-
hold, men have come here tonight from the the Jordan, to the fords. And as soon as those
children of Israel to search out the country. who pursued them had gone out, they shut
3So the king of Jericho sent to Rahab, say- the gate.
8Now before they lay down, she came up
ing, Bring out the men who have come to
you, who have entered your house, for they to them on the roof, 9and said to the men:
have come to search out all the country. I know that the Lord has given you the
4Then the woman took the two men and land, that the terror of you has fallen on us,
hid them. So she said, Yes, the men came and that all the inhabitants of the land are
to me, but I did not know where they were fainthearted because of you. 10For we have
from. 5And it happened as the gate was being 2:1aHebrew S hittim
2:1 Ancient Jericho (Heb. lit. moon and thus moon city) 2:9 The spies needed help, and Rahab needed protection.
may be the oldest city in the world and likely was dedicated Apparently of all the inhabitants of Jericho, Rahab alone
to the worship of a moon god. Located about five miles west believed in Israels God. Her words are an indictment of the
of the Jordan River, Jericho was an oasis in the Dead Sea area. Israelites whose unbelief caused them to lose 40 years in the
This fortress city controlled the entrance to the land. The con- wilderness. In effect, she told them the battle had been won
quest of Jericho formed the initial stage of Joshuas military when God delivered them from Egypt (vv.10, 11). Rahab did
strategy of divide and conquer. Rahabs house was probably lie to protect the spies (vv.4, 5), for deception and espionage
built over the gap between the two walls, 12 to 15 feet apart, are part of warfare. Scripture unequivocally forbids lying, and
a common practice in that day (v.15). Rahab is described as nowhere does God condone Rahabs lying (Prov.12:22). How-
a harlot (Heb. zanah). There is no evidence that she was a ever, we must affirm Rahabs great faith and leave any judg-
sacred prostitute in the service of her pagan gods (see Ra- ment of her to God. Extenuating circumstances challenged
hab). Prostitution was practiced commonly in the Canaanite the new faith of this resourceful woman, and God honored
culture. Lodging in the house of a prostitute may have been a her faith by giving her a place in the lineage of the Messiah
way for the spies to avoid detection when entering and leaving (Matt. 1:5).
the city.
Rahab was obviously an intelligent woman. She showed a remarkable knowledge of the recent
history of Israel as well as of what God was doing for the Israelites when they approached her
country. In fact, she seemed more aware of Gods intervention for Israel than Israel was (notice
the similarity of her words in Josh. 2:911 with Josh. 1:2, 11, 13). In addition, she obtained an
agreement for protection from the spies, hid them, and outsmarted her own people when they
came looking for them.
Rahab also showed initiative in arranging for the deliverance of her entire family. She was a
woman of great courage. Siding with the Israelites was treason, punishable by death, not only for
herself but also for all her family. Once she made her decision, there was no turning back.
Finally, Rahab was a woman with spiritual insight. She recognized the disparity between
Israels God and the gods she and her people served. Israels God was supremeHe did not
share the rule in the heavens and the earth the way their gods reportedly did (Josh. 2:11). Rahabs
initial confession of faith is seen in the use of the name Yahweh. Without any support or input
from her world or Israels, she claimed the covenant name God gave to Moses when the Israelites
first left Egypt (Ex. 3:14). Then, again without any encouragement from others, she acted on her
commitment by hiding the spies. This kind of faith was not often seen in Gods people in the Old
Testament, let alone from a Gentile harlot.
Rahab is a role model for making the right decisions and standing firm, even when it means
going against your own peers. No wonder God wanted to honor her faith and courage by placing
such a woman in the line of the Messiah. Boaz, one of the most gentle and godly men in the Old
Testament, was her offspring (see Matt. 1:5 and the Book of Ruth; see chart, The Family Tree of
Jesus). God honored Rahabs faith and courage by placing her in the lineage not only of Israels
great King David (Matt. 1:6) but also of Jesus, the King of kings (Matt. 1:1).
See also Matt. 1:5; Heb. 11:31; James 2:25; notes on Decision Making (1Cor. 8); Heroines (Heb.11)
heard how the Lord dried up the water of thers house, and give me a true token, 13and
the Red Sea for you when you came out of spare my father, my mother, my brothers, my
Egypt, and what you did to the two kings sisters, and all that they have, and deliver
of the Amorites who were on the other side our lives from death.
of the Jordan, Sihon and Og, whom you ut- 14So the men answered her, Our lives
terly destroyed. 11And as soon as we heard for yours, if none of you tell this business of
these things, our hearts melted; neither did ours. And it shall be, when the Lord has giv-
there remain any more courage in anyone en us the land, that we will deal kindly and
because of you, for the Lord your God, He is truly with you.
God in heaven above and on earth beneath. 15T hen she let them down by a rope
12Now therefore, I beg you, swear to me by through the window, for her house was on
the Lord, since I have shown you kindness, the city wall; she dwelt on the wall. 16And she
that you also will show kindness to my fa- said to them, Get to the mountain, lest the
2:11 Our hearts melted indicated physical and emotional dis- 2:1221 Middle Eastern culture centered around the family
tress resulting in the inability to act (Ps. 97:5). Rahabs words and clan. The faith and actions of one member could affect
confirm the fulfillment of Moses song of victory after cross- the whole family (see Josh. 7:24, 25; chart, Temptation: The
ing the Red Sea (Ex. 15:1416). Rahab drew a contrast between Analysis of a Successful Trap). The agreement between Rahab
the one God of Israel and the many gods of the Canaanites. and the spies required faithfulness on both sides (Josh. 2:14).
Unlike the Canaanite gods, Yahweh is not a god of a particular Rahab was to keep secret the activities of the spies, bring all
place and function; rather He is supreme everywhere. He is ac- her family into her house, and display the scarlet cord (vv.14,
tively involved in the lives and events of His people (Josh. 2:9 17, 18). The spies were to see that all Israel spared her house
11). In contrast, the Canaanite gods competed for rule, were and everyone in it.
limited to particular areas and functions, and were involved
with their own lusts, murders, and intrigues.
3 Then Joshua rose early in the morning; take for yourselves twelve men from the
and they set out from Acacia Grovea and tribes
came to the Jordan, he and all the children of
of Israel, one man from every tribe.
13And it shall come to pass, as soon as the
2:24 The report of the spies reflected Rahabs words (vv.9 symbolized the presence of God and rested on top of the ark
11). Unlike the report of the spies who returned to Moses (Ex. 25:1722). Here the priests sprinkled the sacrificial blood
40 years earlier with a report emphasizing the weakness of the for the sins of the people and met God (Lev.16:14). The bring-
Israelites and the strength of the inhabitants of the land, this ing of the ark, which represented Gods presence, before the
report emphasized Gods strength and faithfulness to deliver people meant that they were about to move. As the people
the land into the hands of His people (see Num. 13:2633; see prepared to enter the land, they were to follow the ark of the
chart, Tale of Two Committees). covenant.
3:3 The ark of the covenant (a wooden box overlaid with 3:4 Two thousand cubits was about 3,000 feet or 925 meters
gold, approximately 45 long 27 wide by 27 high) was the (one cubit equals approximately 18 inches; see chart, Money
centerpiece of the tabernacle (see chart, The Plan of the Tab- and Measurements in the Bible). The ark still functioned as a
ernacle). The ark contained the tablets God gave Moses on Mt. guide. The distance required emphasized the sacred nature of
Sinai, a jar of manna, and Aarons rod (Ex. 25:1016; Heb. 9:4, 5; the ark of the covenant and also affirmed the inappropriate-
see chart, The Furniture of the Tabernacle). The mercy seat ness of irreverent familiarity.
3:1417 Only the priests (the spiritual leaders) had to get from the riverbed they had crossed. The Hebrew text itself,
their feet wet. Seeing the priests obey God through their obe- according to some scholars, suggests a second monument in
dience to Joshua was important for the people. the river itself (v.9). In any event, the monument was to serve
4:39 As a reminder of His miraculous provision, the Lord as a witness of Gods faithfulness to His children for future
instructed the people to build a monument with stones taken generations.
5:5 Circumcision had been a covenant requirement since wanderings, crossed the Jordan River, and prepared to take
the time of Abraham (Gen. 17:914). The reason Hebrew males the city of Jericho. The Passover was celebrated in remem-
were not circumcised during the 40 years in the wilderness is brance of their deliverance from slavery in Egypt (see chart,
not known, though the answer may be in the phrase on the The Feasts of Israel). As they ate the produce of the land,
way, indicating that during the years of constant wandering surely they must have marveled that God timed their arrival in
it was not feasible. For whatever reason, clearly God intended Canaan during a season when the land would support them.
this time as another reminder to the Israelites of their special As they ate of the lands abundance, the manna ceased. This
relationship with Him (see Gen. 17, Circumcision). miraculous provision of food, gathered each morning, had
5:6 The land flowing with milk and honey was not a tropical been a daily reminder that God fulfilled His promises.
garden but rather one that was hospitable to flocks and mead- 5:1315 The visitation to Joshua is similar to Moses ex-
ows (the milk of goats and the honey of bees). perience at the burning bush (Ex. 3:28). In the appearances
5:1012 The reminders of Gods faithfulness became ap- to both men, the Lord pronounced the ground holy and
parent to the Israelites after they completed their wilderness instructed them to remove their sandals (Josh. 5:15). Joshua
6
12And Joshua rose early in the morning,
ow Jericho was securely shut up be-
N
cause of the children of Israel; none went and the priests took up the ark of the Lord.
13Then seven priests bearing seven trumpets
out, and none came in. 2And the Lord said to
Joshua: See! I have given Jericho into your of rams horns before the ark of the Lord
hand, its king, and the mighty men of valor. went on continually and blew with the trum-
3You shall march around the city, all you men pets. And the armed men went before them.
of war; you shall go all around the city once. But the rear guard came after the ark of the
This you shall do six days. 4And seven priests Lord, while the priests continued blowing
shall bear seven trumpets of rams horns be- the trumpets. 14And the second day they
fore the ark. But the seventh day you shall marched around the city once and returned
march around the city seven times, and the to the camp. So they did six days.
15But it came to pass on the seventh day
priests shall blow the trumpets. 5It shall
come to pass, when they make a long blast that they rose early, about the dawning
with the rams horn, and when you hear the of the day, and marched around the city sev-
sound of the trumpet, that all the people en times in the same manner. On that day
shall shout with a great shout; then the wall only they marched around the city seven
of the city will fall down flat. And the people times. 16And the seventh time it happened,
shall go up every man straight before him. when the priests blew the trumpets, that
6Then Joshua the son of Nun called the Joshua said to the people: Shout, for the
priests and said to them, Take up the ark Lord has given you the city! 17Now the city
of the covenant, and let seven priests bear shall be doomed by the Lord to destruction,
seven trumpets of rams horns before the it and all who are in it. Only Rahab the har-
ark of the Lord. 7And he said to the people, lot shall live, she and all who are with her in
Proceed, and march around the city, and let the house, because she hid the messengers
him who is armed advance before the ark of that we sent. 18And you, by all means abstain
the Lord. from the accursed things, lest you become
8So it was, when Joshua had spoken to the accursed when you take of the accursed
would have recognized the scenario immediately and under- dents of Jericho already were paralyzed with fear. In addition,
stood this theophany (a visible appearance of God in bodily for six days they watched this fearsome people, led by the ark,
form) as another affirmation of his appointment as Moses symbolizing Gods presence, march daily around their city with
successor. The presence of this divine Commander had been only trumpet blasts piercing the silence. Imagine how they
promised 40 years earlier (Ex. 23:20; Josh. 1:9). felt on the seventh day when the process was repeated over
6:5 Conquering a walled city usually required breaching the and over!
walls or laying siege until the inhabitants exhausted their food 6:18 Destroying the spoils of war was a recognized meth-
and water supplies (a process often taking months). But God od of devoting these spoils to a deity. To covet and take
displayed His power to the Israelites by leveling the walls that what had been devoted to God was sin and would have far-
had frightened their fathers 40 years earlier (Num. 13:28). reaching consequences. A consistent OT theme is the effect
6:816 The psychological warfare is ingenious. The resi- of an individuals sin on the family, the community, and even
JUSTICE
things, and make the camp of Israel a curse, utterly destroyed all that was in the city,
and trouble it. 19But all the silver and gold, both man and woman, young and old, ox
and vessels of bronze and iron, are conse- and sheep and donkey, with the edge of the
crated to the Lord; they shall come into the sword.
treasury of the Lord. 22But Joshua had said to the two men
20So the people shouted when the priests who had spied out the country, Go into the
blew the trumpets. And it happened when harlots house, and from there bring out the
the people heard the sound of the trumpet, woman and all that she has, as you swore to
and the people shouted with a great shout, her. 23And the young men who had been
that the wall fell down flat. Then the people spies went in and brought out Rahab, her
went up into the city, every man straight be- father, her mother, her brothers, and all
fore him, and they took the city. 21And they that she had. So they brought out all her
an entire nation (see Josh. 7:1026; chart, Temptation: The ered the firstfruits. The firstfruits were to be given to Him
Analysis of a Successful Trap). When a nation comes under in acknowledgment that all comes from Him (Ex. 23:19;
judgment and even innocents are destroyed, its people have 34:19, 26).
themselves to blame and not God (Amos 2:4). The booty was 6:23 Rahab was willing to give up her pagan gods and turn to
not important to God but rather the obedience of His peo- the one true God. She is listed among the heroes of faith (Heb.
ple. He did not demand the spoils from all the cities (Josh. 11:31; see Josh. 2, Rahab).
8:2). But the booty of Jericho, the first victory, was consid-
6:26 To sacrifice a firstborn child at the founding of a city illustrates how the sin of an individual has consequences for
was not uncommon for ancient pagans. Joshuas prediction the family and community. However unfair it may seem, the
came true in the time of Ahab, one of Israels most evil kings wrongdoing of one does indeed affect others adversely (Deut.
(see 1Kin. 16:34, note). 5:9; Josh. 6:1719). Individual responsibility and corporate guilt
7:1 Accursed things. When taking Jericho, the Israelites were often go hand in hand (see chart, Temptation: The Analysis of
commanded to spare Rahab and her family and to abstain from a Successful Trap).
the things accursed (Heb. cherem, lit. devoted). The term 7:47 The path to despair is clear in this experience of
has evolved to describe the enclosed, private apartments for Joshua at Ai. It begins with overwhelming defeat (v.4). De-
women. This curse applied to Jericho was the most severe, feat brought discouragement (v.5), followed by despair (v.6)
meaning that someone and/or something was absolutely and loss of vision (v.7). God offered recovery: Sanctify or set
and irrevocably consecrated to destruction with no possibil- yourself apart (v.13) and do what the Lord directs you to do
ity of redemption (Lev.27:28, 29). The experience of Achan (Josh. 8:1).
7:19 Personal confession. Though God pointed the finger make the Valley of Achor a door of hope (Hos. 2:15).
at Achan, Achan himself needed to confess his sin before the 8:2 The booty of Ai was not the firstfruits as in the case of
people. The expression give glory to the Lord God of Israel Jericho (see Josh. 6:18, note); so Israel was allowed to take
is used here and elsewhere to call for an honest confession the booty specified. Consulting the Lord concerning each
(1Sam. 6:5; Jer. 13:16; John 9:24). battle was important because the Lord seldom used the same
7:24 The Valley of Achor (Heb. lit. trouble) is so named be- method twice. He led the Israelites in psychological warfare at
cause of Achans sin and the consequences it brought on the Jericho but used military strategy at Ai.
Israelites. Later through the prophet Hosea, God promised to
Joshua lodged that night among the people. not go out after Israel. So they left the city
10Then Joshua rose up early in the morning open and pursued Israel.
and mustered the people, and went up, he 18Then the Lord said to Joshua, Stretch
and the elders of Israel, before the people to out the spear that is in your hand toward Ai,
Ai. 11And all the people of war who were with for I will give it into your hand. And Joshua
him went up and drew near; and they came stretched out the spear that was in his hand
before the city and camped on the north side toward the city. 19So those in ambush arose
of Ai. Now a valley lay between them and Ai. quickly out of their place; they ran as soon as
12So he took about five thousand men and he had stretched out his hand, and they en-
set them in ambush between Bethel and Ai, tered the city and took it, and hurried to set
on the west side of the city. 13And when they the city on fire. 20And when the men of Ai
had set the people, all the army that was on looked behind them, they saw, and behold,
the north of the city, and its rear guard on the the smoke of the city ascended to heaven.
west of the city, Joshua went that night into So they had no power to flee this way or that
the midst of the valley. way, and the people who had fled to the wil-
14Now it happened, when the king of Ai derness turned back on the pursuers.
saw it, that the men of the city hurried and 21Now when Joshua and all Israel saw that
rose early and went out against Israel to bat- the ambush had taken the city and that the
tle, he and all his people, at an appointed smoke of the city ascended, they turned back
place before the plain. But he did not know and struck down the men of Ai. 22Then the
that there was an ambush against him be- others came out of the city against them; so
hind the city. 15And Joshua and all Israel they were caught in the midst of Israel, some
made as if they were beaten before them, and on this side and some on that side. And they
fled by the way of the wilderness. 16So all the struck them down, so that they let none of
people who were in Ai were called together them remain or escape. 23But the king of Ai
to pursue them. And they pursued Joshua they took alive, and brought him to Joshua.
and were drawn away from the city. 17There 24And it came to pass when Israel had
was not a man left in Ai or Bethel who did made an end of slaying all the inhabitants of
8:33 The stranger in this verse may refer to non-Israelites leadership of Joshua provided the impetus needed to unite
who had accepted Israels God and therefore had been ac- these traditionally independent cities. From this point, Israel
cepted into the Hebrew community (see also v. 35). Aliens faced a coalition of united forces rather than one city at a time.
or strangers who embraced Yahweh as God and chose to live
among Gods people were assimilated into the nation (1Kin.
9:115 The inhabitants of Gibeon were identified as the Hi-
vites, one of the seven nations God had promised to drive out
8:4143).
of the land before Israel (v.7; Josh. 3:10; see also Deut. 7:1, 2;
8:34 The blessings and curses are outlined in Deuteronomy map, The Division of the Land). The testimony of the Gibeon-
27:128:68. ites provides additional evidence that the people of Canaan
8:35 Two requirements were fulfilled by Joshua: the altar and were not totally ignorant of Gods truth (v.9). They knew Israel
its sacrifices were a visual reaffirmation of Moses covenant was allowed to make treaties with cities that accepted peace
(vv.30, 31; Ex. 24:38), and the reading was a fulfillment of and became Israels servants, except for the seven nations
Moses written memorial (Ex. 17:14; Josh. 1:8). named (Deut. 20:10, 11); so they concealed their identity to
9:1, 2 The reputation of Israels conquering army under the deceive Joshua and save themselves.
9:1920 Even though the treaty was based on deceit, the vious victories and the surrender of the Gibeonites, the Israel-
leaders of Israel were obligated to honor it since they had ites were entrenched in the central highlands close to Jerusa-
sworn by the Lord God of Israel. The commitment of the oath lem. The coalitions strategy was to recapture Gibeon because
was to the Lord, not to the Gibeonites (vv.1820). of its strategic location.
10:1 The five kings of the Amorites. As a result of their pre-
10:611 Gibeons treaty with Israel required Israel to come type long day, or the rotation of the earth may have slowed.
to the aid of the Gibeonites (Josh. 9:15). God gave His people Numerous details about the battle are noted: the extent of
victory. Israels march, their attack and pursuit, the names of battle
10:1214 Joshuas longest day. One of Gods most spec- sites, the names of kings, a description of the hailstorm. The
tacular miracles is cited also in the Book of Jasher, a piece supplying of such details shows that this is not mere legend
of Hebrew poetic literature chronicling Israels victories but an actual military debriefing. We do know these three
that is now lost (see 2 Sam. 1:18). Subsequent verses give things about the miracle of the sun standing still: nothing
strategic and military details of the battle. Exact details on like this ever happened before or after; God was responsible
the inner workings of the miracle are not recorded. Perhaps for whatever transpired; and He acted because Joshua called
the earth tilted so that Israel would experience a northern- upon Him for help.
10:40 Joshua conquered all the land. This summary state- north of the Sea of Chinnereth (later Sea of Galilee), Hazor
ment indicated that by the taking of certain strategically lo- covered at least 200 acres (compared with Jerichos approxi-
cated cities, Israel gained a measure of control over the south- mately seven acres). It had massive walls and was surrounded
ern region. Full political control would take place much later by a fortified ditch. Conquering Hazor was essential to the
under King David. conquest of the northern portion of the country. Recent ar-
11:1 Hazor was much more formidable than any of the previ- chaeological excavations at Hazor have uncovered a wide va-
ous cities (see map, The Division of Land). Located ten miles riety of Canaanite structures.
their kings, Joshua took and struck with the ing to all that the Lord had said to Moses;
edge of the sword. He utterly destroyed them, and Joshua gave it as an inheritance to Israel
as Moses the servant of the Lord had com- according to their divisions by their tribes.
manded. 13But as for the cities that stood on Then the land rested from war.
their mounds,a Israel burned none of them,
except Hazor only, which Joshua burned. TheKings Conquered by Moses
12
14And all the spoil of these cities and the
T
hese are the kings of the land whom
livestock, the children of Israel took as booty the children of Israel defeated, and
for themselves; but they struck every man 11:8aHebrew Misrephoth Maim 11:13aHebrew tel, a heap
with the edge of the sword until they had de- of successive city ruins 11:16aHebrew arabah
11:19, 20 Instruments of judgment. When God promised rebellion, and depravity of the Canaanites continued until the
the land to Abraham, He did not instruct him to drive out or day came when Gods judgment fell on them. God uses many
destroy the inhabitants of the land because at that time the instruments of judgment. In the case of the Canaanites, the
iniquity of the Amorites was not yet complete (Gen. 15:16). instrument was the Israelite army (see Josh. 6, Justice).
God was patient with the inhabitants of Canaan for hundreds
of years, giving them many opportunities to repent. Yet de-
11:22 The Anakim were the giants who frightened the
Israelites 40 years earlier (Num. 13:33).
spite the witness of Gods people to the one true God and such
warnings as the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, the sin, 12:124 The leadership of Moses and Joshua (vv. 124)
13:14 The tribe of Levi was to be scattered among the people Joseph was divided between two tribes named after Josephs
with the assignment of performing the sacrifices and teach- sons Ephraim and Manasseh, bringing the count again to
ing the Law (Deut. 33:810). Therefore, this tribe would not be 12 tribes (see chart, The Breastplate of the High Priests
counted among the 12 in the land division. The inheritance of Clothing).
14 These are the areas which the chil- of God concerning you and me in Kadesh
dren of Israel inherited in the land of Barnea. 7I was forty years old when Moses
Canaan, which Eleazar the priest, Joshua the the servant of the Lord sent me from Kadesh
son of Nun, and the heads of the fathers of Barnea to spy out the land, and I brought
the tribes of the children of Israel distribut- back word to him as it was in my heart. 8Nev-
ed as an inheritance to them. 2Their inheri- ertheless my brethren who went up with
tance was by lot, as the Lord had command- me made the heart of the people melt, but I
ed by the hand of Moses, for the nine tribes wholly followed the Lord my God. 9So Moses
and the half-tribe. 3For Moses had given the swore on that day, saying, Surely the land
inheritance of the two tribes and the half- where your foot has trodden shall be your
tribe on the other side of the Jordan; but inheritance and your childrens forever, be-
to the Levites he had given no inheritance cause you have wholly followed the Lord my
among them. 4For the children of Joseph God. 10And now, behold, the Lord has kept
were two tribes: Manasseh and Ephraim. me alive, as He said, these forty-five years,
And they gave no part to the Levites in the ever since the Lord spoke this word to Mo-
land, except cities to dwell in, with their ses while Israel wandered in the wilderness;
common-lands for their livestock and their and now, here I am this day, eighty-five years
property. 5As the Lord had commanded Mo- old. 11As yet I am as strong this day as on the
ses, so the children of Israel did; and they day that Moses sent me; just as my strength
divided the land. was then, so now is my strength for war, both
14:1 Eleazar is named first because he, as priest, would have and Thummim apparently were sacred lots used to determine
the ephod with the Urim and Thummim (see Ex. 28:15; Deut. Gods direction. The Israelites considered the use of lots as a
33:8, notes). Though the exact procedure is not clear, the Urim way to leave the choice completely in Gods hands.
15 So this was the lot of the tribe of the of Ekron northward. Then the border went
children of Judah according to their around to Shicron, passed along to Mount
families: Baalah, and extended to Jabneel; and the
The border of Edom at the Wilderness border ended at the sea.
12The west border was the coastline of the
of Zin southward was the extreme south-
ern boundary. 2And their southern border Great Sea. This is the boundary of the chil-
began at the shore of the Salt Sea, from the dren of Judah all around according to their
bay that faces southward. 3Then it went out families.
to the southern side of the Ascent of Akrab-
bim, passed along to Zin, ascended on the
Caleb Occupies Hebron and Debir
13Now to Caleb the son of Jephunneh he
south side of Kadesh Barnea, passed along to
Hezron, went up to Adar, and went around to gave a share among the children of Judah,
Karkaa. 4From there it passed toward Azmon according to the commandment of the Lord
and went out to the Brook of Egypt; and the to Joshua, namely, Kirjath Arba, which is He-
border ended at the sea. This shall be your bron (Arba was the father of Anak). 14Caleb
southern border. drove out the three sons of Anak from there:
5The east border was the Salt Sea as far as Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai, the children
the mouth of the Jordan. of Anak. 15Then he went up from there to
And the border on the northern quarter the inhabitants of Debir (formerly the name
began at the bay of the sea at the mouth of of Debir was Kirjath Sepher).
16And Caleb said, He who attacks Kirjath
the Jordan. 6The border went up to Beth
Hoglah and passed north of Beth Arabah; Sepher and takes it, to him I will give Achsah
and the border went up to the stone of Bohan my daughter as wife. 17So Othniel the son
the son of Reuben. 7Then the border went up of Kenaz, the brother of Caleb, took it; and
toward Debir from the Valley of Achor, and he gave him Achsah his daughter as wife.
18Now it was so, when she came to him, that
it turned northward toward Gilgal, which
is before the Ascent of Adummim, which is 15:8aLiterally Giants
15:1 The tribe of Judah was not the largest, nor was Judah the Mediterranean (see map, The Division of Land).
eldest son of Jacob. However, a line of kings, beginning with 15:18, 19 Caleb apparently reared his family well (see chart,
David and ending with Christ, the King of kings, came from Caleb: Portrait of a Hero). His daughter Achsah was not afraid
this tribe (Gen. 49:10). to speak up, and her forthrightness was rewarded (see Ach-
15:4 The Brook of Egypt was a stream that ran into the Med- sah). Othniel, Calebs nephew, became Achsahs husband, and
iterranean and served as the southern boundary between Ju- later was one of the judges of Israel (Judg. 1:1215; 3:911; see
dahs inheritance and Egypt. The sea (or Great Sea, v.12) is the chart, The Period of the Judges).
Achsah, Calebs daughter, appeared on the scene when her father offered a marriage between her
and whomever was able to conquer the town Kirjath Sepher. The primary interest for everyone
at that time was the land. Everything depended on ittheir worship, home, food, financial and
political security, and the ability to raise a family. Since it was the custom of the day for parents to
arrange marriages, the offer Caleb made was not unusual.
Calebs nephew Othniel accepted the challenge, took the Canaanite town, and won both
Achsah and the portion of land promised. Yet Achsah knew their land would only be productive
with a water source. Seeing the solution in the nearby springs, Achsah discussed the situation
with her husband and convinced him that they needed to approach her father for help. Her
approach to her father for a blessing was likely a request for a wedding present and was
consistent with the blessings for weddings and families (Deut. 28:114).
Achsah showed interest and involvement in her inheritance, her marriage, and her future. She
was not greedy, but neither was she hesitant to pursue what was needed just as the industrious
woman pictured in Proverbs 31:27.
See also notes on Decision Making (1Cor. 8); Feminine Leadership (1Sam. 25); Wives (Prov.31)
she persuaded him to ask her father for a Joktheel, 39Lachish, Bozkath, Eglon, 40Cab-
field. So she dismounted from her donkey, bon, Lahmas,a Kithlish, 41Gederoth, Beth
and Caleb said to her, What do you wish? Dagon, Naamah, and Makkedah: sixteen
19She answered, Give me a blessing; since cities with their villages; 42Libnah, Ether,
you have given me land in the South, give Ashan, 43Jiphtah, Ashnah, Nezib, 44Keilah,
me also springs of water. So he gave her the Achzib, and Mareshah: nine cities with their
upper springs and the lower springs. villages; 45Ekron, with its towns and villages;
46from Ekron to the sea, all that lay near Ash-
TheCities ofJudah dod, with their villages; 47Ashdod with its
20This was the inheritance of the tribe of towns and villages, Gaza with its towns and
the children of Judah according to their fam- villagesas far as the Brook of Egypt and the
ilies: Great Sea with its coastline.
21The cities at the limits of the tribe of 48And in the mountain country: Shamir,
the children of Judah, toward the border of Jattir, Sochoh, 49Dannah, Kirjath Sannah
Edom in the South, were Kabzeel, Eder, Ja (which is Debir), 50Anab, Eshtemoh, Anim,
51Goshen, Holon, and Giloh: eleven cities
gur, 22Kinah, Dimonah, Adadah, 23Kedesh,
Hazor, Ithnan, 24Ziph, Telem, Bealoth, with their villages; 52Arab, Dumah, Eshean,
25Hazor, Hadattah, Kerioth, Hezron (which 53Janum, Beth Tappuah, Aphekah, 54Hum-
is Hazor), 26Amam, Shema, Moladah, 27Ha- tah, Kirjath Arba (which is Hebron), and
zar Gaddah, Heshmon, Beth Pelet, 28Hazar Zior: nine cities with their villages; 55Maon,
Shual, Beersheba, Bizjothjah, 29Baalah, Ijim, Carmel, Ziph, Juttah, 56Jezreel, Jokdeam,
Ezem, 30Eltolad, Chesil, Hormah, 31Ziklag, Zanoah, 57Kain, Gibeah, and Timnah: ten
Madmannah, Sansannah, 32Lebaoth, Shil- cities with their villages; 58Halhul, Beth Zur,
him, Ain, and Rimmon: all the cities are Gedor, 59Maarath, Beth Anoth, and Eltekon:
twenty-nine, with their villages. six cities with their villages; 60Kirjath Baal
33In the lowland: Eshtaol, Zorah, Ash- (which is Kirjath Jearim) and Rabbah: two
nah, 34Zanoah, En Gannim, Tappuah, Enam, cities with their villages.
35Jarmuth, Adullam, Socoh, Azekah, 36Shara- 61In the wilderness: Beth Arabah, Middin,
im, Adithaim, Gederah, and Gederothaim: Secacah, 62Nibshan, the City of Salt, and En
fourteen cities with their villages; 37Zenan, Gedi: six cities with their villages.
Hadashah, Migdal Gad, 38Dilean, Mizpah, 15:40aOr Lahmam
15:63 The final conquest of Jerusalem occurred under King was divided between the tribes of Josephs two sons, Ephraim
David, several hundred years later (see 2Sam. 5:6, 7). The Book and Manasseh. Jacob, Josephs father, had regarded the two
of Joshua combines victories and failures in a natural way. The sons of Joseph as his own (Gen. 48:5), bringing the count of
rewards of obedience and penalties for disobedience are clear the territories to 12, since the Levites did not inherit a specific
(see chart, Models of Obedience and Disobedience). God re- area (see Josh. 13:14, note).
sponds to the cries of His people, but He is not subject to them.
17:3, 4 See Num. 26, Daughters of Zelophehad; 27:14, 57;
16:1 The descendants of Joseph drew one lot, but the land 36:112, notes.
17:1418 The descendants of Joseph approached Joshua 18:1 The camp was moved from Gilgal on the fringe of the
with two problems: They faced the iron chariots of the Ca- inheritance to the center at Shiloh (modern Khirbet Seilun
naanites, and they expressed the need for more land because about 12 miles south of Shechem). Moving the ark of the cov-
of their size. Their allotment was already one of the largest as enant and setting up the tabernacle of meeting indicated the
well as being in one of the most fertile regions, but it did in- certainty of conquest and symbolized unification under Gods
clude a large mountain range. Joshua turned their argument presence as the tribes began settling the land.
around and suggested that they could best drive out the 18:6 The casting of lots would have been done by Eleazar the
Canaanites and clear the mountain ranges precisely because priest in the presence of the ark of the covenant, establishing
their tribe was so large. the results as Gods choice (see Deut. 33:8, note).
18:1128 The inheritance of Benjamin is described at jamin. Jerusalem, which eventually would be captured by King
length. Though Judah was the tribe of the promised line of David and become the capital of the nation, was near the bor-
kings, Saul, the first king of Israel, came from the tribe of Ben- der between the territories of Benjamin and Judah.
19:15 Bethlehem was the site east of Mount Carmel, not the ended with Joshuas. These were the only two men who ex-
Bethlehem in Judah where Jesus was born. perienced the entire saga of leaving Egypt, wandering in the
19:49 The allotments began with Calebs (Josh. 14:13) and wilderness, and participating in the conquest.
20:19 Cities of refuge were established to provide asylum long-lasting feuds) was customary in OT times.
for an individual who accidentally killed another (Ex. 21:12, 13; 21:142 The 48 cities of the Levites were scattered among
Num. 35:634). A distinction was to be made between willful all the territories because a major part of the role of the
murder and accidental killing or manslaughter (Num. 35:634; priests was to teach all the people Gods Law (see Josh. 13:14,
Deut. 19:113). The practice of blood revenge (often leading to note).
I
R
TA L
Kedesh
HE
Abdon
NAPH
A S
Acco Rehob MANASSEH
Mishal Sea of Ga l ilee
(Chin neroth) Golan
ea
Rimmon
UN
Kartan
L
an S
En Gannim
BU
Helkath k R. Ashtaroth
mu
ZE Daberath r
)
Ya
Sea
Jokneam Kishion
AR
CH
ane
Taanach A Jarmuth
ISS
Ramoth
eat
err
Gilead
Jo rd a n R .
M A N A S S E H
(Gr
dit
Me
Shechem R.
Jabbok
Gath Mahanaim
Rimmon
AIM
HR
Joppa
G A D
EP Shiloh
DA
Beth
Horon Jazer
BENJA
N
J U Hebron
Gaza
Dead Sea Kedemoth
Debir Arnon Gor
Juah (Sa l t g e
Sea )
Jair Eshtemoa
Hebron Cities of refuge (underlined)
Beersheba
Levitical cities:
S I Towns received by Kohathite clans
M E O N
Towns received by Gershonite clans
Towns received by Merarite clans
Ze re
dR
iv er 0 10 km.
0 10 miles
22:1034 The move to Shiloh for the two and a half east- side. Thinking the group had already regressed into worship-
ern tribes made immediate access to the tabernacle of meet- ing other gods, they feared Gods judgment would come upon
ing impossible (see Josh. 18:1, note). The Jordan River divided all of them again as it had when they sinned at Peor by falling
them from the rest of Israel (Josh. 22:25). To avoid becoming a into Baal worship (v.17). Their zeal might have meant disaster
separated people, they built an altar before God as a witness if they had not followed Gods plan for dealing with conflict or
to their unity with the tribes on the western side of the river misunderstanding. Their action was postponed until the facts
(v.34). This action was misinterpreted by those on the western were clear (see Deut. 13:1315).
23:2 The farewell addresses of Joshua are recorded (Josh. 23:3 The secret of Joshuas success was his acknowledgment
23; 24). Chapter 23 may have been addressed to the leaders of the Lord as the great Defender of Israel. He pointed out an
(v.2), while chapter 24 was addressed to all the people (Josh. important principle: Faith in the Lord is rooted in historical
23:2). realities. The NT teaches the same principle (John 20:30, 31).
23:6 The command to demonstrate courage in obedience Joshua and the Israelites experienced. Marks of the covenant
has not lost its importance (Josh. 1:6, 7, 9, 18). It would require are clearly recognized: the ark (Josh. 3:817), circumcision
as much courage for the Israelites to stay true to the Lord in (Josh. 5:27), the Passover (Josh. 5:10), the altar, the rereading
peace as it did for them to march for the Lord in war. Joshua of the Law of Moses with the blessings and curses (Josh. 8:30
gave the people, almost verbatim, the same instructions the 35), and a recitation of the Lords faithfulness (Josh. 24:213).
Lord gave him (Josh. 1:7). 24:1 At Shechem, located in the hill country of Ephraim,
23:8 Joshuas personal commitment to the Lord is described Joshua presented covenant renewal. Joshuas first message, in
by the words hold fast (Heb. davaq). The same Hebrew word abbreviated form, was to the two and a half tribes who were
appears in Genesis 2:24 where a man is instructed to leave his returning to their land on the east side of Jordan (Josh. 22:1
father and mother and to be joined to or cling to his wife 5). The second was possibly to a group of the nations leaders
in the most binding, intimate human relationship. It also de- (Josh. 23). At Shechem, where God previously promised the
scribes a uniquely close relationship with the Lord (Deut. 4:4; land of Canaan to Abraham and his descendants (Gen. 12:6,
10:20; 11:22; 13:4). 7), Joshua renewed the covenant for the last time (see Josh.
8:3035).
23:14, 15 Gods faithfulness is the constant theme in Josh- 24:3 Joshua began with Abraham, whose decision to sepa-
ua (Josh. 1:3; 2:24; 3:10; 10:42; 11:8; 21:4345). Israel had seen
rate himself from the safety and community of his clan in Ur
Gods faithfulness in keeping His promises; they needed to be
and to walk away from the religion of his fathers was a mighty
reminded that He is also faithful in His judgment against sin.
act of faith. Throughout Scripture Abraham is presented as the
23:16 The word covenant does not occur often in the Book prime example of faith (Acts 7:28; Rom. 4:14; Gal. 3:6, 7; Heb.
of Joshua, but the idea of covenant is at the heart of all that 11:812, 1719; James 2:23).
24:6, 7 The safe passage through the Red Sea often is used tained their land, and begun settling it. But Joshua understood
by God as a reference pointing to His faithfulness and pow- that the challenge of choicefaithfulness and obedience,
er (Deut. 11:4; Josh. 2:10; 4:23; Neh. 9:911; Ps. 106:811, 22; or unfaithfulness and disobediencewould be continually
136:1315; Is. 51:10; Acts 7:36; Heb. 11:29). faced in the daily routines of life. He called the people to de-
24:15 Gods faithfulness is a constant theme in Joshua (see clare their loyalty and allegiance to God.
Josh. 23:14, 15, note). The question is: Will His people respond 24:19, 20 The Lord stands alone. Other religions cannot be
faithfully in return? Joshua presented only two choices: Serve incorporated with devotion to the Lord. The first command-
the Lord God or serve foreign gods. They could not serve both ment makes this clear (Ex. 20:3). Apostasy seldom starts with
(see Josh. 24:19, 20, note). Such a challenge might seem more an outright denial of the Lord, but rather with small compro-
appropriate at the beginning of the book rather than at the mises of His teachings. God will not tolerate unfaithfulness
end because at this stage the people had won the wars, ob- and idolatry.
that Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of buried him in a hill belonging to Phinehas his
the Lord, died, being one hundred and ten son, which was given to him in the moun-
years old. 30And they buried him within the tains of Ephraim.
24:31 The testimony to the effectiveness of Joshuas leader- 25). Following Josephs instructions symbolized the comple-
ship is that not only he but also those he trained were faithful tion of this stage of Israels national life and testified to Gods
to the Lord (Josh. 11:15; 24:15; see chart, Preparation for Lead- faithfulness in fulfilling His promises to Abraham, Isaac, and
ership). Jacob.
24:32 The bones of Joseph were to be buried in the land 24:33 The death of a servant of God begins and ends this
which God had promised to give to Abraham, Isaac, and Ja- book (Josh. 1:1; 24:2933). However, Gods work continues,
cobthe land in which the Israelites now lived (Gen. 50:24, and His faithfulness to His children never ends.
DATE
According to the text, the story is set during the period of the judges, probably the latter part of that
era (Ruth 1:1; 4:1822), but the date of authorship is generally understood to be during the reign of
David (1010970b.c.). The book must not have been completed before the time of David (Ruth4:22);
yet surely it was not completed after the time of Solomon, or Solomon would have been included.
BACKGROUND
Setting
The setting for Ruth begins and ends in the Judahite village of Bethlehem with a Moab sojourn in
between. Moab was the pagan nation that began with the incestuous relationship between Lot and
his elder daughter (Gen. 19:36, 37). The Moabites, as perpetual enemies of Israel, were the recipients
of consistent pronouncements of judgment from the prophets (see Is. 15:19).
Purpose
With its sad beginning and happy ending, the Book of Ruth portrays the village life of a family
faithfully honoring Yahweh and pictures divine providence even in the midst of adversities and
sorrows. God uses simple people and ordinary events to accomplish His great purposes.
Audience
The Book of Ruth is a primer on family relationships with a message for all. However, women must
have been especially interested in this narrative in which the virtues of womanhood are abundantly
clear. Also, those interested in history must have found the account of Davids genealogy helpful.
The book makes clear Davids faithful ancestry, though he was also of Moabite descent.
THEMES
Some distinct themes appear in the Book of Ruth:
Divine ProvidenceGods undergirding hand is seen and felt throughout the book. God brought
comfort to Naomi in her greatest hurt, following the deaths of her husband and sons, through Ruths
tender and loving care (Ruth 1:16, 17). God provided sustenance in the days of poverty for Ruth and
Naomi, through the generous close relative Boaz, who became the kinsman-redeemer (Ruth 2:7,
8; 4:10). God replaced Naomis root of bitterness with a fountain of joy, through the birth of her
grandson Obed (Ruth 4:15, 16). God used the brokenness of two women who, though seeming to
lose all, found the highest honor in becoming part of the ancestry of the Messiah (Ruth 4:17; see also
Matt. 1:36; Luke 3:3133).
Friendship Between WomenThe remarkable friendship between Ruth and Naomiwomen from
diverse backgrounds (one a Gentile and the other a Hebrew) and different generations (one young
and in the prime of life and the other old and beyond childbearing age)illustrates the unique joys
found in the caring relationships women have with one another as their lives and hearts are knit
together in mutual affection and reciprocal commitment (see Luke 1, Friendship). They are carried
Romantic LoveThis book also describes the growing relationship between a man and a woman, as
the romance of Ruth and Boaz unfolds in a charming way (see Song 2, Romance). Gentile and Hebrew
are ultimately united in marriage to become a link in the chain of redemption.
Redemption and ReconciliationThe Moabitess Ruth experienced spiritual reconciliation as she was
drawn into the family of God. She chose the godly Hebrew family; then God adopted Ruth into His
family. As Ruth remained committed even in the midst of sorrow and poverty, God in His providence
rewarded her with the security of a husbands protective care, the joy of a mothers nurturing task,
and the legacy of her own place in the ancestry of Messiah.
OUTLINE
I. Elimelech and Naomi Left the Land and Lost Divine Protection (1:122)
A. The family experienced tragedy (1:15)
B. Ruth modeled faithfulness (1:622)
II. The Widowed Naomi Returned to the Land and Sought Divine Protection (2:13:18)
A. Ruth met the kinsman-redeemer (2:123)
B. The kinsman-redeemer provided security for Ruth and Naomi (3:118)
III. Boaz and Ruth Obeyed God and Received a Place in the Ancestry of the Messiah (4:122)
A. Boaz exemplified faithfulness (4:117)
B. The family of David received blessing (4:1822)
J or
about the underlying hostility and Rabbah (of
the Ammonites)
d an R .
suspicion the two peoplesJudah
ites and Moabitesfelt for each
other. The original onslaught of the
invading Israelite tribes against towns Jericho
that were once Moabite had never
been forgotten or forgiven, while Jerusalem Heshbon
the Hebrew prophets denounced
Moabs pride and arrogance for try- Mt. Nebo
ing to bewitch, seduce, and oppress Bethlehem
A N
Naomi, Ruth, and Orpah widowed
(Ruth 1:3, 5)
Probable route of Naomi and 0 10 km.
Ruth (Ruth 1:19)
0 10 miles
Naomi and Ruth resettled
(Ruth1:22)
1:1 The text gives no evidence that God directed Elimelech his wife Naomi perhaps more destitute and isolated than if she
(Heb. lit. my God is king) to leave Bethlehem (contrast Abra- had remained among friends and relatives.
hams exodus from his homeland, Gen. 12:1). Fertility of soil 1:5 The plight of a widow in biblical days was especially pre-
and abundance in harvest have never been ultimate security carious. Young widows were allowed lodging in their fathers
against famine. Neither is changing location necessarily Gods home (Gen. 38:11; see also 2Kin. 4; Ps. 68; Jer. 29, Widowhood),
way of dealing with a crisis (see Rom. 8:3739). Elimelechs de- but an older widow whose parents were dead was dependent
parture from Bethlehem (Heb. lit. house of bread) did not upon her children for support. Seemingly, God had snatched
keep him and his two sons from dying in a foreign land, leaving away her familys usefulness and productivity.
Destitute
Famine in Judah Death of Husband Death of Sons Leaving of Orpah
Poverty
(Ruth 1:1) (Ruth 1:3) (Ruth 1:5) (Ruth 1:14)
(Ruth 1:21)
the way to return to the land of Judah. 8And 11But Naomi said, Turn back, my daugh-
Naomi said to her two daughters-in-law, Go, ters; why will you go with me? Are there still
return each to her mothers house. The Lord sons in my womb, that they may be your hus-
deal kindly with you, as you have dealt with bands? 12Turn back, my daughters, gofor
the dead and with me. 9The Lord grant that I am too old to have a husband. If I should
you may find rest, each in the house of her say I have hope, if I should have a husband
husband. tonight and should also bear sons, 13would
So she kissed them, and they lifted up their you wait for them till they were grown?
voices and wept. 10And they said to her, Sure- Would you restrain yourselves from having
ly we will return with you to your people. husbands? No, my daughters; for it grieves
1:8 Gods dealings with His children are described theolog- 1:9 Rest is more than the cessation of work and the absence
ically as kindly (Heb. chesed; see Ex. 20:5, 6, note; 34:57; of anxiety. Certainly this rest implied much more than a mar-
Ruth 3:10). No ingredient is more essential in an intimate riage ceremony, and included security, provision, and blessing
relationship because such an attitude precludes bitterness, (see Josh. 21:44). The same word is translated security in
retaliation, negative criticism, or other destructive behavior. Ruth 3:1.
Chesed is love joined to loyalty and integrated with mutual 1:13 For anyone who accepts full sovereignty of a just and
commitment (see Jer. 31:3); it is action and feeling combined. merciful God, the existence of evil by divine permission (the-
What is received is returned. The mixture of divine will and odicy) is a natural dilemma. Naomi implied an indictment of
human activity joins the warmth of Gods fellowship with the unfaithfulness against God, whose relationship to His people
security of His faithfulness. had always been based squarely upon the presupposition of
COMMITMENT
me very much for your sakes that the hand 17 Where you die, I will die,
of the Lord has gone out against me! And there will I be buried.
14Then they lifted up their voices and The Lord do so to me, and more also,
wept again; and Orpah kissed her mother- If anything but death parts you and me.
in-law, but Ruth clung to her. 18When she saw that she was determined to
15And she said, Look, your sister-in-law
go with her, she stopped speaking to her.
has gone back to her people and to her gods; 19Now the two of them went until they
return after your sister-in-law. came to Bethlehem. And it happened, when
16But Ruth said:
they had come to Bethlehem, that all the city
Entreat me not to leave you, was excited because of them; and the women
Or to turn back from following after you; said, Is this Naomi?
20But she said to them, Do not call me
For wherever you go, I will go;
Naomi; a call me Mara,b for the Almighty has
And wherever you lodge, I will lodge;
Your people shall be my people, dealt very bitterly with me. 21I went out full,
And your God, my God. 1:20aLiterally Pleasant
bLiterally Bitter
His faithfulness. Naomi determined, because of her personal 1:20, 21 The Almighty has dealt bitterly with me. What a
losses, that God had turned away from her, and she decided to natural reaction to blame God for any misfortune (see Heb.12,
reciprocate by turning away from Him. She asked to be called Bitterness). Naomi was conscious of her own wrongdoing and
Mara (Heb. lit. bitter; see v.20). Nevertheless, a glimmer viewed her suffering as Gods punishment for her own sins
of hope existed for Naomi because she, by her reference to the (see Ruth 1:13, 20, 21). On the other hand, God views affliction
Lord (Heb. Yahweh), placed these tragic experiences of losing as a necessary part of His sovereign and loving purpose (Eccl.
her husband, sons, and earthly belongings in the setting of the 7:14; 2Cor. 12:710; see also Is. 42; 1Pet. 4, Suffering). A believ-
covenant promise. This use of the Lords personal covenant er going through the fire can produce a beautiful and pleasant
name reminded Naomi and her daughters-in-law of Gods ul- aroma to the Lord (Num. 29:6; 2Cor. 2:15).
timate faithfulness. In contrast to the verse 1 reference to the devastation of
Orpah : T H E D A U G H T E R - I N - L A W W I T H A W A V E R I N G FA I T H
Orpah is a name with root meanings as diverse as fawn or young doe, double-minded, or
even nape of the necksuggesting the meaning of stubborn or stiff-necked. She wavered
in her commitment to Naomi and chose to return to her life in Moab instead of clinging to
Yahweh (Ruth 1:414; 4:9, 10).
Orpah was not a bad woman and, in fact, showed deep affection for the mother of her
deceased husband Chilion. However, although Orpah loved and respected her mother-in-law
Naomi, she did not have the depth of loyalty and spirit of selflessness for a permanent lifestyle
commitment to Naomi and the God of Israel.
Naomis persuasive words painted a vivid picture of the uncertainties to come, and Orpah
seemingly turned her thoughts to her own devices for happiness. With her return to Moab, she
vanished from the pages of biblical history.
See also chart on In-Law or In-Love (Ruth 4)
and the Lord has brought me home again the field after the reapers. And she happened
empty. Why do you call me Naomi, since the to come to the part of the field belonging to
Lord has testified against me, and the Al- Boaz, who was of the family of Elimelech.
mighty has afflicted me? 4Now behold, Boaz came from Bethle-
22So Naomi returned, and Ruth the Mo-
hem, and said to the reapers, The Lord be
abitess her daughter-in-law with her, who with you!
returned from the country of Moab. Now And they answered him, The Lord bless
they came to Bethlehem at the beginning of you!
barley harvest. 5Then Boaz said to his servant who was in
charge of the reapers, Whose young woman
Ruth Meets Boaz is this?
2
6So the servant who was in charge of the
here was a relative of Naomis husband,
T
a man of great wealth, of the family of reapers answered and said, It is the young
Elimelech. His name was Boaz. 2So Ruth the Moabite woman who came back with Nao-
Moabitess said to Naomi, Please let me go to mi from the country of Moab. 7And she said,
the field, and glean heads of grain after him Please let me glean and gather after the
in whose sight I may find favor. reapers among the sheaves. So she came
And she said to her, Go, my daughter. and has continued from morning until now,
3Then she left, and went and gleaned in though she rested a little in the house.
famine, Naomi testified, I went out full, realizing that her 2:3 The bringing together of Ruth and Boaz cannot be at-
husband and sons were worth far more than land and wealth tributed to chance, especially when God begins with provision
(a restoration of her own sense of values). She had been gen- of food in famine (Ruth 1:6) and ends with the gift of a child
uinely blessed in Bethlehem, even in the midst of famine and to an empty womb (Ruth 4:13). Chance (happened) simply
poverty. Naomi chose to assign the blame for her tragedies means that no human intent was involved; the fact that Ruth
to the Lord. Contrasting her own weakness, she referred to chose the field of her close relative in which to glean was un-
His power by calling Him Shaddai (Heb.), here translated Al- planned and unforeseen on her part.
mighty and understood by some to mean all-sufficiency. 2:7 The ancient custom of gleaning as codified in the Law
God must be trusted for better or worse (see Prov.24:10). gave the widow, or even a resident alien, the right to gather
2:1 Boaz was rich and influential (v. 1), a landowner (v. 3), grain anywhere she pleased (Lev.19:9; 23:22; Deut. 24:19). In
a kind and considerate employer (v. 4), a gentleman who OT Law, a landowner was instructed not to reap complete-
showed respect and courtesy to Ruth and others (vv.8, 9), a ly the corners of his fields, leaving the gleanings for the
sensitive leader who complimented Ruth with genuine praise strangers and the poor. Gods welfare plan has always made
(v.12), a generous benefactor (v.14; Ruth 3:15), a spiritual lead- provision for the poor (Lev.19:9, 10; 23:22; see Luke 9, the
er (Ruth 2:12), a man who chose to be a channel for happiness Homeless; 14, Poverty), but the needy, as they were able, also
(vv.15, 16), and a man of high moral character (Ruth 3:713; see willingly worked for what they received (2Thess. 3:10). This
also Gen. 2, Masculinity and Godly Manhood). generous provision in the Law is understood to be an act of
Naomi : A W I S E M O T H E R -I N -L A W
During the period of the judges, approximately 1200 b.c., a famine in the region of Bethlehem
caused Elimelech to take his wife Naomi and their two sons to the green fields of Moab east of
the Dead Sea. Shortly after arriving, however, Elimelech died, and Naomi was left as an alien to
work in a nation that practiced polygamy and idol worship.
In time, her two sons chose wives, Ruth and Orpah, before whom Naomi continued to live
a pious life of dedication to Yahweh. As a widow and a single parent, she demonstrated inner
strength; when both of her sons died, she faced her destitution with resoluteness, determined
to return to her home in Israel. She believed that God had dealt harshly with her. Her life had
been disappointing, but her faith was intact. Consequently, she insisted that her daughters-in-
law return to their mothers homes. Both of them resisted, but eventually Orpah, the widow of
Chilion, returned. Ruth, however, vowed to accompany Naomi back to Jerusalem, renouncing her
own family and religion. Naomi learned that even in the midst of greatest suffering and adversity,
God is good and full of mercy.
Having returned to her homeland, Naomi wisely introduced Ruth to her new environment
and coached her on proper behavior, masterminding Ruths contacts with Boaz, a relative of
Elimelech. Naomi models the way God works through a woman who moves forward, even in the
midst of tragedy and trial, actively seizing every opportunity God provides rather than waiting
passively for events to happen. In the providential care of God, eventually Boaz agreed to act
as the goel (Heb.) or kinsman-redeemer provided in Jewish law, buying the estate of Naomi and
taking Ruth as his wife. The blessing of God on their home produced a son, Obed, who became
an ancestor of King David and of Jesus Christ.
Naomi had not always responded appropriately in her time of affliction. Though she
acknowledged Gods working in her life, she misjudged God, for example, when she said that
she left Bethlehem full. Actually it had been the emptiness of famine that had driven her family
away from their homeland. She continued her analogy by accusing God of bringing her back
empty, and indeed she had lost her husband and sons, but in their place God had given her Ruth,
a devoted daughter-in-law (Ruth 4:15). By focusing on the negative, Naomi became so bitter
(Ruth1:20) that she could not see the good and positive plans God was working.
And yet, throughout the Book of Ruth, we see Naomi grow into a woman of deep faith and
wisdom. The result of her wisdom shines throughout Scripture.
See also chart on In-Law or In-Love (Ruth 4); notes on Widowhood (Ps. 68; Jer. 29)
8Then Boaz said to Ruth, You will listen, should take notice of me, since I am a for-
my daughter, will you not? Do not go to glean eigner?
in another field, nor go from here, but stay 11And Boaz answered and said to her, It
close by my young women. 9Let your eyes has been fully reported to me, all that you
be on the field which they reap, and go af- have done for your mother-in-law since the
ter them. Have I not commanded the young death of your husband, and how you have
men not to touch you? And when you are left your father and your mother and the
thirsty, go to the vessels and drink from what land of your birth, and have come to a people
the young men have drawn. whom you did not know before. 12The Lord
10So she fell on her face, bowed down repay your work, and a full reward be given
to the ground, and said to him, Why you by the Lord God of Israel, under whose
have I found favor in your eyes, that you wings you have come for refuge.
grace freely given and not a mandate for personal rights forc- who can share from abundance are to express spiritual con-
ibly demanded. Those who receive are to accept whatever cern, exemplifying the character of God that prompts such
care God provides, including food and shelter, with humble generosity to others (Ruth 2:11, 12; see Matt. 10:8; Luke 6:38).
spirit and grateful heart (Ruth 2:1719; see Eph. 5:20). Those
Ruth : A FA I T H F U L M O A B I T E S S
Ruth, a Moabitess, grew up on the high plateau south of the Arnon River, probably in a
polygamous nation as a worshiper of the false god Chemosh.
A Hebrew family came from Bethlehem to Moab, and they were different. The mother, Naomi,
was treated with respect by her husband Elimelech.
Ruth, who was asked to be the bride of Naomis son Mahlon, was thus introduced into a
close, mentoring relationship with this wise, stable woman whom she came to love and admire.
Ruth and her sister-in-law Orpah bonded closely with Naomi. The three women clung together
as they watched their husbands die.
Naomi had heard that the famine in Bethlehem was past, and she wanted to return home. She
strongly urged her daughters-in-law to return to their respective homes to live in the womens
quarters so that once again they would be eligible for marriage. Both young women wanted to
stay with her, but after an emotional farewell, Orpah relented and returned to her home.
Ruth, however, steadfastly clung to Naomi. Her name is a contraction of the Hebrew reuth,
from the root for sight, meaning something worth seeing, or possibly friendship. Ruth
understood that moving to Bethlehem meant total renunciation of her heritage and a lifetime
of living as a foreigner. Her vow to Naomi stands as one of the most beautiful statements of
commitment in history (Ruth 1:16, 17).
The arrival of the two women in Bethlehem marked the beginning of a new life for Ruth. She
worked in the barley fields of Naomis relative, Boaz, gleaning the edges left for the poor people.
The stalks of grain were collected and threshed with a heavy wooden hand tool; then with a large
fork the grain was lifted into the air to allow the wind to blow away the chaff. Many of the poor
women flirted with the reapers and tried to steal grain, but Ruth soon gained a reputation for
such honesty and integrity that the owner commended her.
Following the wise counsel of her mother-in-law, humble Ruth won the respect and
eventually the love of Naomis kinsman Boaz, who bought the estate of Naomi and took Ruth as
his wife. In so doing he became a kinsman-redeemer (see Lev.25:25).
Ruth lives in history as a model of womanhood, willing in joy and confidence to break with
her past on the basis of Gods revelation taught to her by a loving mother-in-law. God uses the
faithfulness of ordinary women to accomplish His extraordinary plans: He provided bread for two
widows through Ruths gleaning; He provided security for the young widow Ruth through her
marriage to Boaz; He provided posterity for Naomi through Obed, the son born to Ruth and Boaz;
God provided a great king for Israel and even the Messiah through this Gentile woman.
See also Lev.25:25; Is. 59:20; Matt. 1:5; note on Vows (Num. 30); chart on In-Law or In-Love (Ruth4)
13Thenshe said, Let me find favor in her; leave it that she may glean, and do not
your sight, my lord; for you have comforted rebuke her.
me, and have spoken kindly to your maid 17So she gleaned in the field until eve-
servant, though I am not like one of your ning, and beat out what she had gleaned,
maidservants. and it was about an ephah of barley. 18Then
14Now Boaz said to her at mealtime, she took it up and went into the city, and
Come here, and eat of the bread, and dip her mother- i n-
l aw saw what she had
your piece of bread in the vinegar. So she sat gleaned. So she brought out and gave to her
beside the reapers, and he passed parched what she had kept back after she had been
grain to her; and she ate and was satisfied, satisfied.
and kept some back. 15And when she rose 19And her mother- in-law said to her,
up to glean, Boaz commanded his young Where have you gleaned today? And where
men, saying, Let her glean even among the did you work? Blessed be the one who took
sheaves, and do not reproach her. 16Also let notice of you.
grain from the bundles fall purposely for So she told her mother-in-law with whom
The Results
Ruth and Orpah: Of Sinin Women
A Contrast
RUTH ORPAH
An intelligent love of choice An emotional love of feeling
Genuine spiritual base for her conduct and decisions Selfish basis for decision making
she had worked, and said, The mans name with, is he not our relative? In fact, he is win-
with whom I worked today is Boaz. nowing barley tonight at the threshing floor.
20Then Naomi said to her daughter-in- 3Therefore wash yourself and anoint your-
law, Blessed be he of the Lord, who has not self, put on your best garment and go down
forsaken His kindness to the living and the to the threshing floor; but do not make your-
dead! And Naomi said to her, This man is self known to the man until he has finished
a relation of ours, one of our close relatives. eating and drinking. 4Then it shall be, when
21Ruth the Moabitess said, He also said
he lies down, that you shall notice the place
to me, You shall stay close by my young men where he lies; and you shall go in, uncover
until they have finished all my harvest. his feet, and lie down; and he will tell you
22And Naomi said to Ruth her daughter-
what you should do.
in-law, It is good, my daughter, that you go 5And she said to her, All that you say to
out with his young women, and that people me I will do.
do not meet you in any other field. 23So 6So she went down to the threshing floor
she stayed close by the young women of and did according to all that her mother-in-
Boaz, to glean until the end of barley harvest law instructed her. 7And after Boaz had eat-
and wheat harvest; and she dwelt with her en and drunk, and his heart was cheerful,
mother-in-law. he went to lie down at the end of the heap
of grain; and she came softly, uncovered his
Ruths Redemption Assured feet, and lay down.
3
8Now it happened at midnight that the
hen Naomi her mother-in-law said to
T
her, My daughter, shall I not seek se- man was startled, and turned himself; and
curity for you, that it may be well with you? there, a woman was lying at his feet. 9And he
2Now Boaz, whose young women you were said, Who are you?
2:20 Two important Hebrew concepts were motivated by Because Boaz (Heb. lit. in him is strength) was a relative
commitment to family and a determination to cooperate in of Elimelech, he was eligible to be the goel or kinsman-
continuing the family line: the function of the goel (Heb. lit. redeemer with the right and responsibility to redeem the
kinsman-redeemer or close relative; see Ruth 3:118) and forfeited inheritance of the family so that the property of
the practice of levirate marriage (see also Deut. 25:510). Only the dead man remained within the family. This responsibility
in the Book of Ruth are these two concepts linked. The close usually included care for the widow (see Deut. 25:510). Boaz
relative or kinsman-redeemer functioned in behalf of an- functioned as Ruths kinsman-redeemer and in so doing pre-
other person and his property within the family circle in times figured Christ as the ultimate goel. Three requirements of the
of crisis. These are his functions: goel have been fulfilled in Christ: He must be related by blood
1) He redeems property by purchasing what has been (Phil. 2:58); He must be able to pay the price (1Pet. 1:18, 19);
lost and returning it to the one who was forced to sell and He must be willing to redeem (Matt. 20:28).
(Lev.25:2528). 3:39 Naomis daring plan. Love culminating in a desire
2) He redeems persons, that is, a relative who was forced to for the highest good in the person loved, even to the point
sell himself into slavery (Lev.25:4755). of self-sacrifice, is illustrated in Naomi. Sensing that Boaz
3) He redeems blood; that is, he avenges the death of a rel- and Ruth were already genuinely attracted to one another
ative who has been murdered (Num. 35:1621, 31). and understanding well the law of the kinsman-redeemer,
Naomi devised a strategy based upon knowledge of levirate is a metaphor suggesting her need for protection just as young
marriage (see Deut. 25:510). By this practice a widow became birds would run under the wings of their mothers to escape
the wife of her husbands brother or another close relative in birds of prey. Yahwehs wing is Boazs wing! A Jewish hus-
order to produce a child who would inherit her first husbands band covers his bride with the end of his prayer shawl (Heb.
estate and preserve his name. Some scholars debate whether tallith) as a symbolic gesture that she is under his protection
levirate marriage is fully applicable in the story of Ruth. In any (see Ezek. 16:8). Ruths humble request to Boaz is for his pro-
case, the producing of a male child to continue the name of tection as a close relative. Any argument for sexual consum-
the deceased was at stake in Ruth. Ruths loyalty to the tradi- mation goes beyond what the text states and runs counter
tion of her husbands people and her desire to care for Naomi to the characterization of Ruth and Boaz as a virtuous couple
by marrying someone within the family was a tribute to her who would not have yielded to the temptation to consummate
commitment to the family of her deceased husband. Without their relationship before the proper time. The risk to spoil
any effort to trap Boaz or put him in a compromising situa- Gods plan is certainly there. The Hebrew text uses words that
tion, Ruth made a straightforward, yet delicate and beautiful, are commonly used for sexual relationships (lie down and
appeal to inspire Boaz to do the duty of a close relative. The uncover, vv.4, 7), implying that Ruth and Boaz had oppor-
kinsman duty was one performed, not for personal gain but tunity but rightly refused to disobey Gods Law. Compare and
as an act of pure love. The goel was motivated to marry not by contrast Ruth, who did the honorable thing, with Tamar, who
the force of law but by the influence of custom prompted by played the harlot (see Gen. 38, Tamar). Ruth trusted God; Ta-
the intent expressed in Deuteronomy 25. mar took matters into her own hands.
Ruths request, Take your maidservant under your wing, 4:7 The nearest kinsman could refuse to act as goel (see Ruth
G R A N D PA R E N T H O O D
A LIVE-IN GRANDMA
Naomi no doubt lived with Ruth and Boaz and had a close daily relationship with her grandson, Obed.
Here are some Bible-based principles Naomi may very well have exemplified in her experiences as a live-
in grandma.
Use your accumulated wealth of knowledge, time-tested insights, and experience to provide wise
counsel when needed (Prov.1:5). You may bridge the gap between parent and child (perhaps gently
reminding a parent of her own behavior when a teenager), while being careful never to undermine parental
authority. Be there, but do not meddle.
Do not complain (about aches and pains). Instead, praise God for your long life. You will be happier, and
so will people around you (1Thess.5:18). You will also be modeling for your grandchild the concept that
growing old can be an enjoyable experience.
Stay active and maintain interests outside the family (Col.2:6, 7). Your needs and appointments are
important, too. You can enjoy and minister to children and grandchildren without giving up usefulness in
other areas of life.
Exemplify for your grandchildren that
Forgiveness is the highest form of giving (Eph.4:32);
Right and wrong are defined by Gods Word (Prov.14:12);
Great joy can be experienced in living each day, rather than dwelling on the past or future
(Neh.8:10; Ps.118:24).
See also Matt.18:3, note; notes on Aging (Is.46); Children (2Sam.21; Ps.128; Prov.22; Luke15); Family
(Gen.32; 1Sam.3; Ps.78; 127); Grandparenthood (Ps.71; 129); Influence (Esth.4); portrait of Naomi
(Ruth1)
his sandal and gave it to the other, and this and the elders, said, We are witnesses. The
was a confirmation in Israel. Lord make the woman who is coming to
8Therefore the close relative said to Boaz, your house like Rachel and Leah, the two
Buy it for yourself. So he took off his san- who built the house of Israel; and may you
dal. 9And Boaz said to the elders and all the prosper in Ephrathah and be famous in Beth-
people, You are witnesses this day that I lehem. 12May your house be like the house of
have bought all that was Elimelechs, and all Perez, whom Tamar bore to Judah, because
that was Chilions and Mahlons, from the of the offspring which the Lord will give you
hand of Naomi. 10Moreover, Ruth the Moab- from this young woman.
itess, the widow of Mahlon, I have acquired
as my wife, to perpetuate the name of the Descendants ofBoaz and Ruth
13SoBoaz took Ruth and she became his
dead through his inheritance, that the name
of the dead may not be cut off from among wife; and when he went in to her, the Lord
his brethren and from his position at the gave her conception, and she bore a son.
14Then the women said to Naomi, Blessed
gate.a You are witnesses this day.
11And all the people who were at the gate,
4:10aProbably his civic office
2:20, note), thereby losing the right to the inheritance and per- other would symbolize the transfer of property or possession.
haps even experiencing the indignity of the contemptuous spit- 4:11 This wedding prayer suggests a blessing which might
ting in the face. In this case, the next kinsman could then come have customarily been recited on the occasion of betrothals in
forward. Since treading upon the soil signified taking posses- Bethlehem. Ruth was like Rachel in being blessed with children
sion of fixed property, taking off the sandal and giving it to an- after a long period of barrenness.
The
ThePlan of Herods
Family Tree ofTemple
Ruth
Abraham Lot
(Gen.11:2631; (Gen. 11:27)
Matt.1:2)
Judah
(Gen. 29:3035; Moab
Matt. 1:2) (Gen. 1:93337)
Perez
(Ruth 4:18;
Matt. 1:3)
Boaz Ruth
(Ruth 4:21; (Ruth 4:13;
Matt. 1:5) Matt. 1:5)
Obed
(Ruth 4:17;
Matt. 1:5)
Jesse
(Matt. 1:5)
Women
David
(Ruth 4:17; Marital Relationships
Matt. 1:6) Descendant
be the Lord, who has not left you this day who is better to you than seven sons, has
without a close relative; and may his name borne him. 16Then Naomi took the child
be famous in Israel! 15And may he be to you and laid him on her bosom, and became a
a restorer of life and a nourisher of your old nurse to him. 17Also the neighbor women
age; for your daughter-in-law, who loves you, gave him a name, saying, There is a son born
4:15 To be described as better than seven sons, in a culture termined to respond to Naomi in a loving and godly way. Her
in which sons were so highly esteemed, is a supreme compli- decision to care for the aged, impoverished, and embittered
ment. This commendation of Ruth as an extraordinary woman Naomi is rewarded both by the security of a wealthy and de-
also bears testimony to the loving ministries she performed voted husband and by the joy and blessing of motherhood in
in Naomis behalf above what would have been expected of bearing a son, who, in turn, gave her a place in the ancestry of
any daughter or son. The relationship between mother and the Messiah. The commitment between these two is a pattern
daughter-in-law is described by many as the most trouble- for mutual benefit and a doorway for the blessings of heaven
some in the human family. Yet the lives of Ruth and Naomi to be showered upon them both (Ruth 1:7, 8, 16, 17).
portray an example of the joy found when divine principles 4:17 The book ends with an outline of the lineage of the
are followed even in that most difficult relationship. The re- Messiah as a reminder of redemption. The focus falls upon the
sult is loving commitment, mutual comfort, and consistent vital link in which the Hebrew (Boaz) and the Gentile (Ruth)
edification (see chart, In-Law or In-Love). Decisions to follow unite to share in the ancestry of David, through whom would
Gods way are always honored and blessed by God. Ruth de- come Jesus Christ.
In-Law or In-Love
The family unit in the Bible includes many domestic relationships: both those related by blood and those related by
marriage. In the Hebrew society, a husband and wife were more closely associated with the grooms parents than
the brides. The bride left her family and people to become a member of her husbands family with all the rights and
responsibilities of a daughter (Ruth 1:17). These relationships ranged from extremely hostile (Gen. 26:34, 35) to lovingly
helpful (Ruth 4:15). Ideally, in-law relationships were mutually beneficial to all within the family circle, extending the
supportive base of the family for helping and encouraging one another and exemplifying spiritual values to successive
generations (Ps. 78:46).
MOTHER-IN-LAW DAUGHTER-IN-LAW
Commits (Ruth 1:7, 8) Commits (Ruth 1:16, 17)
Expresses gratitude (Ruth 1:8, 9) Expresses loyalty (Ruth 1:10)
Acts unselfishly (Ruth 1:1113) Responds unselfishly (Ruth 2:1418)
Becomes bitter (Ruth 1:20, 21) Exercises creativity (Ruth 2:13)
Shows interest (Ruth 2:19) Communicates response (Ruth 2:19, 21, 23)
Offers counsel (Ruth 3:24, 18) Accepts counsel (Ruth 3:5, 6)
See also Ex. 18:7, 24; 1 Sam. 18:22, 23, 26; notes on Family (Gen. 32; 1 Sam. 3; Ps. 78; 127); Fruit of the Spirit (Ps. 86; Rom. 5; 15;
1 Cor. 10; 13; Gal. 5; Eph. 4; Col. 3; 2 Thess. 1; Rev. 2); Motherhood (Ezek. 16); Parenthood (Prov. 10); Portraits of Naomi (Ruth 1);
Ruth (Ruth 2).
to Naomi. And they called his name Obed. begot Nahshon, and Nahshon begot Sal-
He is the father of Jesse, the father of David. mon;a 21Salmon begot Boaz, and Boaz begot
18Now this is the genealogy of Perez: Obed; 22Obed begot Jesse, and Jesse begot
Perez begot Hezron; 19Hezron begot Ram, David.
and Ram begot Amminadab; 20Amminadab 4:20aHebrew Salmah
DATE
First Samuel records the history of Israel from the end of the age of the judges to the death of Saul,
the first king of Israels monarchy. This period covers approximately 110 years (about 11201010b.c.).
Since the last words of David are recorded, the Samuel books could not have been completed
before Davids death in about 970b.c. (2Sam. 23:1). The majority of scholars place the date of the
composition of the books of Samuel somewhere between the death of David and the Assyrian
captivity (722b.c.).
BACKGROUND
Setting
The Book of 1Samuel begins with Israel at one of the lowest points in her history. During the
conquest of Canaan, the tribes of Israel had not fully carried out Gods command to drive out
the Canaanites (Josh. 17:12, 13). Moral and spiritual failures resulted. Thus God brought discipline
through foreign nations. A tragic cycle began in which Israel would briefly return to God under the
leadership of a divinely appointed judge/deliverer, only to lapse again into disobedience. At the
beginning of 1Samuel, Israels priest Eli was weak and his family corrupt. Disrespect for God and His
ways permeated the culture. At this point in time Israel constituted a group of twelve tribes loosely
held together by worship, gathered around a central sanctuary, the tabernacle, where Yahweh was
to dwell among them. They had no central leader and frequently fell prey to other nations because
of their failure to trust and obey their God. But tremendous changespolitically, socially, and
religiouslywere about to take place. At the end of 1Samuel this same nation was ready to anoint
its second king, David, whose appointment would usher in the period recognized as the zenith of the
kingdom of Israel in the Old Testament world.
Audience
First and 2Samuel were originally one book in the Hebrew Bible, recording Israels history from
the end of the period of the judges through the rise of the monarchy. The historical narrative was
compiled for the people of Israel at the end of Davids reign, or at least no later than the Assyrian
captivity of 722b.c., which would probably have been mentioned in the text if the date were after
that major event.
Literary Characteristics
First Samuel contains historical prose narratives, with the exception of Hannahs prayer in the form
of a poetic hymn, and a few proverbial statements.
THEMES
Within the historical narrative of 1Samuel, key themes are found. The rise of the monarchy in Israel
is described. Clearly this period of history affirms that leaders must be led by God, not by their
desires, culture, religious tradition, or situation. Reverence for God is demonstrated by obedience to
His commands (see chart, Models of Obedience and Disobedience). God must be the object of faith;
patience and trust are necessary to allow Him to work in His time and way. The sovereignty of God
is specifically seen in Hannahs life and in the choosing of Samuel (1Sam. 1:1, 20), Saul (1Sam. 10:20
24), and David (1Sam.16:613).
OUTLINE
I. TransitionFrom Judges to Monarchy (1:17:17)
A. Samuels birth and childhood (1:12:11)
1. Samuels family members (1:13)
2. Hannahs barrenness and prayer for a child (1:418)
3. Gods gift of a child and Hannahs obedience in dedicating the child (1:1928)
4. Hannahs praise (2:110)
5. Samuels apprenticeship (2:11)
B. The corrupt priesthood (2:1236)
1. The sins of the priesthood (2:1217)
2. The blessing of children (2:1821)
3. The judgment upon the priesthood (2:2236)
C. Samuels call (3:14:1)
1. Gods call to Samuel (3:114)
2. Samuels obedience to Gods call (3:1518)
3. Samuel as a prophet (3:194:1)
1:1 Birthplace and lineage of Samuel. Ramathaim Zophim clear from the text that the sovereign God was responsible for
(also Ramah, v.19) was a city located in the hill country of Hannahs barrenness (1Sam. 1:5, 6; see also Gen. 16:2; 20:18;
Ephraim, five and a half miles north of Jerusalem. This was the 30:2). In addition to her sorrow, Hannah repeatedly experi-
home of Elkanah and Hannah and the birthplace of their son, enced the cruelty of Elkanahs other wife, Peninnah (1Sam.
Samuel (see Hannah). Both Elkanah (Heb. lit. God created) 1:2, 6, 7). This prolific child bearer (all her sons and daugh-
and his son Samuel were Levites by lineage (1Chr. 6:3338). ters, v.4) made Hannah miserable, provoking her to the point
Therefore, the young boy Samuel was qualified to serve in of grief and pain (v.6). Yet in the midst of Hannahs suffering,
the tabernacle and later as a priest for the nation (1Sam. 7:9; she became a woman of prayer and praise (v.10; 1Sam. 2:110).
9:13; 10:8; 11:15; 16:5). Following the instructions of the Law, When the situation was unbearable, Hannah turned in prayer
Elkanah took his two wives to the tabernacle at Shiloh to wor- to God, not to someone or something else. In spite of her bit-
ship and sacrifice to the Lord (1Sam. 1:3; Ex. 34:23; Deut. 16:16) terness of soul, Hannah in fervent prayer focused on the Per-
despite religious corruption at Shiloh (1Sam. 2:1217). son of God as Lord of the hosts of heaven and earth (v.11). Her
1:2 Polygamy was culturally acceptable in Samuels day. High perspective is significant since Israel was at one of the lowest
priority was placed on having numerous descendants to car- points in her history, with a small and weak army, surrounded
ry on the family name and inheritance as well as to work the by powerful enemies. Hannah also was content to trust God to
fields. However, whenever God discusses, arranges, or illus- avenge Peninnahs cruelty (see Deut. 32:35; and Davids words
trates marriage in Scripture, it is always in a context of mo- in 2Sam. 3:39).
nogamy (see Gen. 2:24, note; 1Tim. 3, Polygamy). God gave 1:11 Devout Israelite parents were expected to commit their
Adam one wife (Gen. 2:18); Gods concept of oneness in mar- firstborn son to the Lord, a requirement of the Mosaic Law (Ex.
riage implies one spouse (Gen. 2:2224); God designed mar- 22:29). Hannah went further in her prayer (see Phil. 1, Prayers
riage as a complementary relationship of two people (Gen. for Your Children). Though she did not use the word Nazirite,
2:18, 21, 22); the king of Israel was specifically commanded Hannah clearly was dedicating the entire life of her anticipat-
not to take many wives (Deut. 17:1517; see also 1Kin. 11, Sol- ed son for service to the Lord. Though the Nazirite vow was
omons Pagan Wives). seldom taken for a lifetime, no other incidents of the taking
1:6 Barrenness was a disgrace in OT times. However, it is of this vow in behalf of someone else are found (Num. 6:27).
Hannah : D E V OT E D M OT H E R
Out of the materialism and ruthlessness of Israel during the period of the judges, Hannah
emerged as a woman of faith. From her home in the hills north of Jerusalem, she had traveled to
Shiloh, the national place of worship. Her sadness of heart and persistence in prayer contrasted
sharply with the prevalent corruption in worship led by Elis sons (1Sam. 2:1217).
Hannahs personal life was one of despair in her childlessness as she recoiled from Peninnahs
pestering reproach. Her prayer exhibits selflessness as she pled for a son whom she might
present to God for service to Him (1Sam. 1:11). Clearly, Hannah was loved and valued for herself
by her husband, Elkanah, but even the intensity of a devoted husbands love could not overcome
her inner disquiet nor overcome her yearning for a child (v.8). Hannahs despair was so evident in
Hannahs prayers that the aged Eli accused her of drunkenness. But beyond her prayers and tears,
Hannah made a pact with God. She pledged to give back to God the precious life He might give
to her. God honored her bold and decisive act.
Hannahs faith was rewarded, and her son was named Samuel (Heb. shemuel, Heard by
God) because she asked for him from the Lord (1Sam. 1:20). According to custom, she
probably nursed him several years, giving time for her to convey to Samuel her own spirit of deep
reverence and piety and also to knit her heart with his through maternal bonding. Nonetheless,
she kept her word to the Lord. With a beautiful prayer of faith that prefigured Marys Magnificat
(1Sam. 2:110; Luke 1:4655), Hannah placed her son in the care of Eli the priest. This was an
act of saintly sacrifice. Her commitment was to God; her gift was pre-arranged with Him. With
prophetic insight she planted the next generation just as promised.
Samuel grew up to become the last judge, an outstanding and gifted prophet, and the one
who would anoint the first two kings of Israel. Samuel was the pivotal spiritual leader who turned
the nation toward Yahweh. His mother Hannah played her part in this spiritual awakening as she
trusted God, leaving for all posterity an example of determined devotion in her motherhood.
See also notes on Motherhood (1Sam. 1); Naming of Children (Is. 45); Vows (Num. 30)
18And she said, Let your maidservant 21Now the man Elkanah and all his house
find favor in your sight. So the woman went went up to offer to the Lord the yearly sacri-
her way and ate, and her face was no longer fice and his vow. 22But Hannah did not go up,
sad. for she said to her husband, Not until the
child is weaned; then I will take him, that
Samuel Is Born and Dedicated he may appear before the Lord and remain
19Then they rose early in the morning and there forever.
23So Elkanah her husband said to her, Do
worshiped before the Lord, and returned
what seems best to you; wait until you have
and came to their house at Ramah. And El-
weaned him. Only let the Lord establish Hisa
kanah knew Hannah his wife, and the Lord
word. Then the woman stayed and nursed
remembered her. 20So it came to pass in the her son until she had weaned him.
process of time that Hannah conceived and 24Now when she had weaned him, she
bore a son, and called his name Samuel,a
1:20aLiterally Heard by God 1:23aFollowing Masoretic
saying, Because I have asked for him from Text, Targum, and Vulgate; Dead Sea Scrolls, Septuagint, and
the Lord. Syriac read your.
1:24 The normal time for weaning a child among the Israelite rael, God focused on one family and in particular one woman
mothers of this period was about three years of age (see Judg. in that family, Hannah, who modeled reverence for God and
13, Pregnancy and Breastfeeding). obedience to Him (vv.7, 11, 2428; 1Sam. 2:19; see also Han-
1:24 Hannah was faithful to her vow as she brought Samuel nah; Prov.31, The Virtuous Wife of Proverbs). Such an attitude
to the house of the Lord. At the birth of the monarchy in Is- is a key theme as 1Samuel records the rise of the monarchy
M OT H E R H O O D
in Israel. Though leadership that reverenced and obeyed God 2:1 Hannahs praise, like the psalms, is in the poetic hymnic
was practically nonexistent at this time in Israels history, both form of Hebrew poetry. Hers is the fruit of an intimate relation-
reverence and obedience to God were modeled by Hannah for ship with God developed in the midst of trial and the declara-
her son Samuel, who in turn modeled them for a nation (see tion of who God is and what He does (vv.110; see Deut. 10:21).
chart, Models of Obedience and Disobedience). The example Hannah, led by the Spirit of God, spoke prophetically of the fu-
of Samuels life also was observed by Israels first two kings, ture king the Lord would give His people (1Sam. 2:10). Signifi-
Saul and David (1Sam. 10:1; 16:13). The influence of one life can cantly, Hannahs words were similar to the praise of Mary, the
never be underestimated. mother of Jesus, in the Magnificat (Luke 1:4655) and of Zach-
1:28 Samuel (Heb. lit. God heard) was presented to Eli the arias, the father of John the Baptist (Luke 1:6879). Hannah not
priest at the tabernacle (v.24), but in actuality he had already only focused her praise on the Person of God but also on what
been dedicated to the Lord and belonged to Him (v.28; see He had done for her. Horn was used as a symbol of strength in
also Is. 45, Naming of Children). First, Samuels father wor- the OT (see Ps. 89:17, 24). Hannah rejoiced that my horn is lifted
shiped the Lord (1Sam. 1:28); then his mother worshiped in a high because the Lord had strengthened her to have a child.
song of praise that focuses on the One who heard her prayer 2:2 Declaring the unique holiness of God, Hannah used
(1Sam. 2:110). Samuel personified the response of God to the rock imagery to highlight Gods divine strength, refuge,
prayerful intercession of His people. and stability (see Deut. 32:4). She joyously testified to Gods
He will give strength to His king, even as a child, wearing a linen ephod.
And exalt the horn of His anointed. 2:12aLiterally sons of Belial
powerful intervention in her personal life, using the strongest ness of Gods creation under His sovereign control. Along
of terms to express her deliverance and salvation. In light of with upholding His creation, God protects and sustains the
Gods character, Hannah warned all, including Peninnah, how righteous (1Sam. 2:8, 9; see Job 38:4; Ps. 75:3, 10).
foolish it is to be arrogant. God knows our pride and will eval- 2:10 Even before the establishment of the monarchy, Han-
uate it by His standards. The Lord also will thunder against nah spoke prophetically of Israels coming king whose king-
all who oppose Him (1Sam. 2:10). dom would culminate in the Messiah (see also Gen. 49:10;
2:48 Gods sovereignty is emphasized through a series of Deut. 17:1420).
vivid life reversals (for example, the strong are broken, while 2:14 God had provided for specified portions of the sacrifi-
the weak are strengthened, vv.48). This section of contrasts cial offering to go to the priests after the fat had been burned
climaxes in declaring Gods power over life and death (v.6). on the altar (Lev.7:3036), but Elis sons, Hophni and Phine-
Hannah illustrates that a sovereign God can, and in her situa- has, took unlawful portions even before the Lord received
tion did, reverse human circumstances (1Sam. 1:20; 2:5; see what was His (1Sam. 2:16, 17), treating the Lords offering with
also Eccl. 7, Providence). contempt (v.17). Worst of all, they caused the Lords people
2:8 The pillars of the earth pictures the stability and firm- to sin (v.24).
19Moreover his mother used to make him a Prophecy Against Elis Household
little robe, and bring it to him year by year 22Now
Eli was very old; and he heard
when she came up with her husband to offer everything his sons did to all Israel,a and
the yearly sacrifice. 20And Eli would bless El- how they lay with the women who assem-
kanah and his wife, and say, The Lord give bled at the door of the tabernacle of meeting.
you descendants from this woman for the 23So he said to them, Why do you do such
loan that was given to the Lord. Then they things? For I hear of your evil dealings from
would go to their own home. all the people. 24No, my sons! For it is not a
21And the Lord visited Hannah, so that
good report that I hear. You make the Lords
she conceived and bore three sons and two people transgress. 25If one man sins against
daughters. Meanwhile the child Samuel grew 2:22aFollowing Masoretic Text, Targum, and Vulgate; Dead
before the Lord. Sea Scrolls and Septuagint omit the rest of this verse.
2:19 Samuel ministered unto the Lord as he grew up under religious realm. Sacred prostitution was practiced by the
the oversight of Eli, participating in the duties performed by Canaanites and may have influenced Elis immoral sons, who
priests in connection with the worship of God. He wore the slept with women at the door of the tabernacle (see Ex. 38:8),
white linen ephod, the priests short sleeveless tunic with a thus desecrating the sanctuary. Such behavior was specifically
belt (v.18). Each year when Hannah came to worship at Shiloh, forbidden to the people of God (Deut. 23:17). The sin of Hophni
she brought a handmade robe, probably resembling the robe and Phinehas was against the Lord (1Sam. 2:1217, 22, 25). Elis
of the ephod described but without the symbolic ornaments mild rebuke had no effect on his wicked sons, who had neither
of the official garment (see Ex. 28:3134; see 1Sam. 1, Mother- reverence for God nor respect for their father (see 1Sam. 3,
hood). Hannahs annual gift to her son may have been a visual Family). A person who disobeys authority does not grow prop-
reminder to Samuel that he had been set apart to lifelong ser- erly (1Sam. 2:113:18). The ultimate authority for Elis sons
vice to the Lord. was self, not God (see Prov.22, Children). The ultimate penalty
2:22 Though the Israelites conquered the Promised Land, for showing contempt for the priesthood (Deut. 17:12, 13), as
they did not fulfill the Lords command to drive out the Ca- well as for constant, blatant rebellion against ones parents,
naanites, whose influence permeated Israel, especially in the was death (Deut. 21:1821).
from My altar shall consume your eyes and nor was the word of the Lord yet revealed
grieve your heart. And all the descendants to him.)
of your house shall die in the flower of their 3:3aHebrew heykal, palace or temple
2:27 As high priest, Eli was to illustrate reverence for God. 3:4 Samuels heart of obedience is demonstrated by his
But Eli did not model this reverence to his sons when he response to what he perceived as calls from Eli as well as by
honored them more than God (v. 29) and with them, was a his following Elis instructions explicitly (vv.410, 16, 18).
part in choosing the best of all the offerings of Gods people However difficult it may have been for Samuel to tell Eli the
(vv.1316). Eli knew the evil actions of his sons and did not Lords word of judgment on his house, the boy was obedi-
discipline them (1Sam. 3:13). For Gods leaders in particular, ent (see Philem., Obedience). He hid nothing from Eli (v.18).
continuing disrespect for God and His ways brings discipline Such a heart attitude soon would enable Samuel to know
and judgment (1Sam. 2:17, 2734; 3:1114). Scripture records the Lord (vv.7, 11). The young boy had seen the obedience
the fulfillment of Gods prophecy against the house of Eli of his parents and the result of blessing in their lives (1Sam.
(1Sam. 4:11, 18; 22:1720; 1Kin. 2:26, 27), illustrating the truth 1:28; 2:1921). Samuel, the apprentice priest, was about
in Psalm 119:89. The predicted enemy in My dwelling place to become the spokesman of GodSamuel, the prophet
(1Sam. 2:32, the tabernacle) implies the Philistines capture of (1Sam. 3:1921), at a time when a word from God was rare
the ark (1Sam. 4:11) and the subsequent destruction of Shiloh (v.1). Becoming a prophet was based solely upon a divine call
(see 1Sam. 4:22). and the empowerment of Gods Spirit. Samuels faithfulness
3:3 Samuels encounter with the Lord most likely took place to speak Gods word indicated that he was fit to be Gods
at night as evidenced by the fact that lamps on the seven- voice in Israel (v.18). When Samuel spoke, people listened
branched lampstand in the tabernacle, filled with olive oil and (v.20; 1Sam. 4:1). God caused Samuels words to come true
lit at twilight, burned until morning (v.3; Ex. 25:3140; 30:8). (vv.19, 21).
T H E D Y S F U N C T I O N A L FA M I LY
8And the Lord called Samuel again the And Samuel was afraid to tell Eli the vision.
third time. So he arose and went to Eli, and 16Then Eli called Samuel and said, Samuel,
said, Here I am, for you did call me. my son!
Then Eli perceived that the Lord had He answered, Here I am.
called the boy. 9Therefore Eli said to Samuel, 17And he said, What is the word that the
Go, lie down; and it shall be, if He calls you, Lord spoke to you? Please do not hide it
that you must say, Speak, Lord, for Your ser- from me. God do so to you, and more also, if
vant hears. So Samuel went and lay down you hide anything from me of all the things
in his place. that He said to you. 18Then Samuel told
10Now the Lord came and stood and
him everything, and hid nothing from him.
called as at other times, Samuel! Samuel! And he said, It is the Lord. Let Him do what
And Samuel answered, Speak, for Your seems good to Him.
servant hears. 19So Samuel grew, and the Lord was with
11Then the Lord said to Samuel: Behold,
him and let none of his words fall to the
I will do something in Israel at which both ground. 20And all Israel from Dan to Beer-
ears of everyone who hears it will tingle. 12In sheba knew that Samuel had been estab-
that day I will perform against Eli all that I lished as a prophet of the Lord. 21Then the
have spoken concerning his house, from Lord appeared again in Shiloh. For the Lord
beginning to end. 13For I have told him that revealed Himself to Samuel in Shiloh by the
I will judge his house forever for the iniqui- word of the Lord.
ty which he knows, because his sons made
themselves vile, and he did not restrain them.
14And therefore I have sworn to the house of
4 And the word of Samuel came to all Is-
rael.a
3:15aFollowing Masoretic Text, Targum, and Vulgate;
Eli that the iniquity of Elis house shall not Septuagint adds and he arose in the morning.
be atoned for by sacrifice or offering forever. 4:1aFollowing Masoretic Text and Targum; Septuagint
15So Samuel lay down until morning,a and and Vulgate add And it came to pass in those days that the
Philistines gathered themselves together to fight; Septuagint
opened the doors of the house of the Lord. adds further against Israel.
4:3 Israel experienced a terrible defeat at Aphek (v.2). In- God had come (1Sam. 4:68). Israel also expectantly believed
stead of engaging in sober reflection as to why God had al- her God would perform (v.5). But Israels sovereign God could
lowed the Philistine victory (v.3), the Israelites brought the not be manipulated (1Sam. 47). Israels Almighty God was
ark of the covenant into the camp (v.5). Their quick solution present, however, faithfully performing His prophetic word
is a tragic example of misplaced confidence. Israel confused a (1Sam. 4:10, 11, 1622; see 1Sam. 2:3136), but the outcome
sacred, but material, object with God Himself, demonstrating was not what the people expected. Israel learned the battles
their lack of understanding of Gods omnipotence and omni tragic outcome when the messenger arrived with clothes torn
presence. They superstitiously believed that divine power and dust on his head, the sign of extreme anguish. God is not
resided in the ark itself (see Josh. 6). In this, Israel may have mocked, nor can He be manipulated by man. Twenty years lat-
been influenced by her pagan neighbors, who believed their er at this same site, the Israelites, led by Samuel, would learn
gods inhabited their idols of wood and stone. To the Philis- that victory is preceded by repentance and a return to God and
tines, the arrival of the ark on the battle site meant Israels His ways.
4:21 Phinehass wife went into premature labor when she she named her newborn child Ichabod (Heb. lit. no glory)
heard her father-in-law (the high priest), as well as her hus- because the ark of the covenant had departed. In the OT the
band and his brother (the high priests successors), were all departure of the Lords glory is always a sign of Gods judg-
dead (v.19). She viewed it as an even greater tragedy that the ment (see Ezek. 1; 911). Gods glory had left Israel because of
ark of the covenant had been captured by pagans (evidenced the sins of the people, in particular the sins of Israels leader-
by her repetition of this fact, vv.21, 22). Even in the agony of ship. There is archaeological evidence that Shiloh was burned
dying in childbirth, she recognized these events as the judg- during this time period. This destruction likely was caused by
ment of God. She interpreted the situation accurately when the Philistine invasion (compare Jer. 7:1214; 26:69).
6:13 The Philistines set up an impossible test (vv.69) but to obedience). The irreverence for a holy God, demonstrated by
no avail. Against animal instinct, the cows had not returned to some of the men of Beth Shemesh when they casually looked
their newborn calves but had gone in the opposite direction, into the ark, is illustrative of this permissive disrespect (v.19).
drawing the cart carrying the ark back to Israel (v.12). With- Whether foolish curiosity resulting from ignorance of Gods
out realizing it the Philistines had set up a test that provided Word, lack of enforcement of Gods ways, or just lustful plea-
an opportunity for the living God to demonstrate His power sure, these men played with the things of God. Their action
and glory before those who did not know Him (vv.1216). The was incompatible with the holiness of the ark of God. The Law
Philistines had learned they could neither mock nor defy God, strictly prohibited any Israelite from having contact with the
but Israel still needed to understand this principle. The Israel- ark of God (Num. 4:5, 15, 20). Now, as the ark returned to Israel,
ites of Beth Shemesh were jubilant when they saw the ark of the necessity of reverence for God had to be reemphasized.
the covenant (v.13). They praised God and consecrated them- 6:19 The number of men put to death is problematic. Some
selves unto the Lord (vv.14, 15). Some, however, were grossly scholars eliminate the 50,000 because a few manuscripts do
disrespectful because they still had the same perspective as not include this phrase. Though these scholars maintain that
when the ark had left (v.19). God had allowed the ark to be the reference to 50,000 is scarce in extant texts, this number
taken because of the lack of faithfulness and the disobedi- is found in all major ancient versions. Josephus interestingly
ence of Israels leadership. The leadership had not modeled recorded the number as seventy. What we do know clearly is
obedience, nor had they taught the people reverence for Gods that there was a great smiting by the Lord at Beth Shemesh
ways (1Sam. 2:17, 26; see chart, Models for Obedience and Dis- (v.19).
TRADITIONS
of Kirjath Jearim, saying, The Philistines eign gods and the Ashtorethsa from among
have brought back the ark of the Lord; come you, and prepare your hearts for the Lord,
down and take it up with you. and serve Him only; and He will deliver you
7:4 Reverence and obedience. Finally Israel began to under- turn to the Lord preceded their deliverance from enemy dom-
stand reverential awe for the Lord (vv.36; 1Sam. 6:20), which ination (vv.1014; see 1Sam. 4:3, note).
in turn produced a heart of repentance (1Sam. 7:6). Such a re-
7:9 When the Israelites were afraid of the Philistines, Samuel ence and Disobedience). When Samuel was old, he appointed
modeled a response of prayer (v.9; see also chart, Solomons his sons as judges over Israel, but they chose not to follow in
Prayer). The people knew Samuel prayed (vv. 8, 9). As his his godly ways (1Sam. 8:5). Having a king was not inherently
mother before him (1Sam. 1:1012; 2:110), Samuel was deep- wrong, since God had already promised a king (Gen. 49:10)
ly committed to prayer (1Sam. 7:8, 9; 8:6; 12:19, 23; 15:11; Ps. and had given guidelines through Moses for a kings behavior
99:6). Scripture repeatedly records that Samuel prayed when (Deut. 17:1420). Even Samuels godly mother prophesied that
he was troubled (1Sam. 8:6; 15:11), as did his mother (1Sam. the Lord will give strength to his king (1Sam. 2:10). But the
1:15; see also chart, Praying for Your Children). God heard Sam- peoples motive was wrong in asking for a king (1Sam. 8:20).
uels prayers (1Sam. 7:9; see Ps. 99:6), and the people knew it They desired to be like other nations, having a king to fight
(1Sam. 7:8; 12:19). The event recorded in 1Sam. 7:10 is illustra- their battles for them, even after Samuel warned the people
tive of Gods response to Samuels prayer. Before the Israelites how a king would treat them (vv.1118, taxation, forced la-
even began to fight, the Lord thundered against the Philis- bor, military service). The paradox was that Israels true King
tines, and they were routed before the Israelites (see 1Sam. desired to do just what their hearts desired (v.7; see 1Sam.
2:10; 2Sam. 22:14, 15). To wait on God is not a waste of time. 10:19). The people would soon learn their mistake when their
Samuel took time to intercede for the people (1Sam. 8:6, 21, difficulties increased.
22). He did not stop praying for the people (1Sam. 12:23), even 8:6 Samuels prayer relationship with God is demonstrated.
after they rejected him (1Sam. 8:5). Samuel was concerned with Israels demand for a king, and he
8:5 God was Israels king, guiding, protecting, and caring spoke to the Lord. When the Lord responded to Samuel (vv.7
for her (v.7; Ex. 19:5, 6), but Gods people went their own way, 9), Samuel knew what to say to the people (vv.1018). The
disobeying Him. God disciplined His children through the op- peoples refusal to listen and their insistent demand for a king
pression of other nations (Deut. 29:1430:1). However, they saddened Samuel (vv.19, 20); as a result, he talked to the Lord
thought they were being overtaken by other armies because again (v.21). The Lords response enabled Samuel to guide the
they did not have a visible human king. Samuel, as prophet and people (v.22). Samuel constantly modeled that prayer is the
priest, had repeatedly pointed the people to God, their king key for effective ministry (1Sam. 7:5; see 1Thess. 5:17; James
(1Sam. 7:3); and at the same time, Samuel modeled a life of 5:16; see also chart, Solomons Prayer).
reverence and obedience to God (see chart, Models of Obedi-
9:3 The establishment of Israels monarchy in chapters 9 and demonstrated through the manner in which God confirmed to
10 illustrated the sovereignty of God as Israels true King. Saul, Saul that he was to be Israels first king (1Sam. 10:27). God
Israels future king, was brought into contact with Samuel, the revealed to Israel that Saul was their new chosen king (1Sam.
kingmaker (1Sam. 9:1418), through the human circumstance 10:2022, 24).
of the lost donkeys (vv. 36). The sovereignty of God was
10:1 The anointing ceremony was a public expression of di- plishing the God-appointed job (Ex. 28:41; 40:1315; 1Sam.
vine consecration to office. It recognized Gods choice of an 9:16). NT believers are also anointed and empowered by the
individual and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit for accom- Spirit who indwells each one (2Cor. 1:21; 1John 2:20, 21).
10:24 Israel had been ruled as a theocracy. Now the es- God raised up prophets to work alongside the king, making
tablishment of an earthly monarchy was bringing Israel to a known Gods purposes. Israel as a nation would be blessed
strategic point in her history. The only way Israels monarchy when the heart of the king followed this pattern. Tragically,
could work was for her king to submit to divine leadership however, Israels kings seldom had such a heart attitude. All
and dominion as he ruled over Israel. The kings authority too often they opposed Gods will, lacking personal disci-
was to be carried out in the name of the Lord. Israels ruler pline and causing the nation ultimately to go into captivity
was to be Gods instrument for accomplishing Gods will. under Gods judgment.
David:
David: How
How Good
Good People
People Get
Get Into
into Trouble
PUNISHMENT
PERSON AND PROBLEMS AND PARABLE AND PSALM AND
AND
CHARACTER FAILURES CONVICTION PRAYER
CONSEQUENCES
1. Gods choice 1. Disobedience 1. Nathans divinely 1. Disgracing of wives 1. Plea for mercy
(1 Sam. 13:14; (2 Sam. 11:14) inspired story (2 Sam. 12:11, 12; 20:3) (Ps. 51:16)
16:7; Acts 13:22) (2 Sam. 12:14)
Deception of others
(2 Sam. 11:26, 27)
7. King
(2 Sam. 5:3, 4)
8. Godly man
(2 Sam. 5:10)
the behavior of royalty, and wrote it in aMake a covenant with us, and we will serve
book and laid it up before the Lord. And you.
Samuel sent all the people away, every man 2And Nahash the Ammonite answered
to his house. 26And Saul also went home them, On this condition I will make a cov
to Gibeah; and valiant men went with him, enant with you, that I may put out all your
whose hearts God had touched. 27But some right eyes, and bring reproach on all Israel.
rebels said, How can this man save us? So 3Then the elders of Jabesh said to him,
they despised him, and brought him no pres-
Hold off for seven days, that we may send
ents. But he held his peace. messengers to all the territory of Israel. And
then, if there is no one to save us, we will
Saul Saves Jabesh Gilead come out to you.
11
4So the messengers came to Gibeah of
Then Nahash the Ammonite came up
and encamped against Jabesh Gilead; Saul and told the news in the hearing of the
and all the men of Jabesh said to Nahash, people. And all the people lifted up their
11:13 At the beginning of Sauls reign, his attitude was one of although Samuel continued in his role as priest and prophet
humility (1Sam. 10:16, 2123) and graciousness (1Sam. 10:26, (1Sam. 12:23; 13:812; 15:30, 31; 16:13). The monarchy had been
27). He was valiant (1Sam. 11:7, 11), giving honor due to the preceded by the development of the prophetic office (1Sam.
Lord (v.13). The Spirit of the Lord had come upon Saul to 3:194:1). Israels first king, Saul, had been anointed and pre-
enable him to rule Gods people Israel (1Sam. 10:6; see Judg. sented to the people by Samuel (1Sam. 10:1, 24), the official
3:10; 6:34; 1Sam. 16:13; see Ezek. 11:5). head of the prophetic line (1Sam. 9:610, 19; Acts 3:24; Heb.
12:1 Samuelthe priest, prophet, and judge of Israel 11:32). The offices of king and prophet were to work together.
combined his farewell warning (vv.14, 15) and challenge to The king was to administer the Lords covenant; the prophet
Israel (vv.20, 21, 24, 25) with a covenant renewal ceremony. was to give spiritual counsel as well as divine instruction, ex-
Here Samuel again modeled commitment to Gods will. At hortation, and rebuke. This working relationship made it nec-
Gods command, Samuel listened to the people asking for essary for the king to respect and be sensitive to the prophets.
a king (1Sam. 8:7, 9, 22). Though personally reluctant, Sam- The prophets responsibility in this regard was to be above
uel officially transferred the leadership from himself to Saul reproach. Samuels godly behavior and determination never
(1Sam. 8:6; 12:2, 13). At this point the period of the monar- to use his prophetic office for selfish gain is set in contrast to
chy formally began. Saul was now the official leader of Israel, his previous warnings of oppressive kingship (1Sam. 8:1117).
12:14 Samuels exhortation to Israel emphasized reverence impending consequences if they did not heed the exhortation
for God (fear the Lord v.14; see Prov.1:7; Ps. 111:10). The fear (1Sam. 12:15). Samuel concluded with the encouraging prom-
of the Lord is evidenced by departing from evil (1Sam. 12:14; ise that God will not forsake His people (v.22); and he, Sam-
see Job 28:28) and obeying Gods commands (1Sam. 12:14; see uel, would not cease to pray for them (v.23).
Eccl. 12:13). A strong warning was given to the people about
13:13 As king of Israel, Saul was to submit to divine lead- plan (vv. 11, 12). He disobeyed Gods word and thus sinned
ership (see 1Sam. 10:24, note). Gods specific command had (v.9). Saul also failed to give godly leadership to his dwindling
been given to Saul through Samuel the prophet (1Sam. 10:8). army and to put his trust in the Lord (contrast Jonathan, 1Sam.
During the pressure of military crisis, Saul did not follow Gods 14:623; see 1Sam. 15:2223; 17:8, note).
instructions (1Sam. 13:5, 6). He chose his own way as the best
14:18 Knowing Gods will. The Septuagints use here of the canceled the inquiry when it appeared more expedient to go
word ephod instead of the term ark may be the better quickly to the battle (vv.19, 20). Neglecting the needs of his
reading. The ark had already been deposited at Kirjath Jearim men, Saul foolishly placed them under oath not to eat until the
(1Sam. 7:1). The ark remained there (1Sam. 7:2) until David battle was over (v.24). His foolish oath encouraged the people
moved it to Jerusalem (2 Sam. 6:117). Bringing it to Sauls to sin. Their hunger and battle fatigue caused them to break
camp seems unlikely since the ark was not an object casually the Lords command (v.32; see Lev.3:17; 17:1014). Properly,
carried about (see Num. 4:15, 20). Since Saul is speaking to a Saul stopped the people and dealt with their offense (1Sam.
priest, it would seem more logical that he would be seeking to 14:34, 35). When Saul did inquire of the Lord and He was silent,
know Gods will rather than to have the ark present. Saul initiated an investigation, assuming Gods silence was the
In the OT era, the priest wore a special garment, the result of the violation of the fasting vow (vv.24, 37). Piously,
ephod, upon which were fastened the Urim and Thummim Saul declared the death penalty for the offender, making his
(see Ex. 28:15, note). This ephod was also used to consult second rash vow (vv.39, 44). Saul was shown to be a fool when
God (Ex. 28:814; 1 Sam. 2:28; 14:3; 23:912). The Urim and the people overruled him to save their innocent hero (v.45).
Thummim of the ephod served as a means of knowing Gods Distracted by his hasty vow, Saul lost his best opportunity to
will (Ex. 28:30; Lev.8:8). Scripture is not clear as to what these rid Israel of the Philistines (v.46). God gave a specific ban
objects looked like or how they were used. One theory is that instruction to Saul (see 1Sam. 15:3, note). But Saul disobeyed
the priests used the stones in a type of lot-casting manner, the Lords command (unwilling to destroy, a verb linked else-
answering yes or no questions (1Sam. 14:41). where with the sin of rebellion, Deut. 1:26), finding something
good in what the Lord had condemned (1Sam. 14:9). Saul gave
14:19 The heart of Saul, characterized by religious per- in to the people (lit. obeyed them) when he should have been
formance without genuine commitment to God, is revealed obeying God (vv.19, 22). Being a people pleaser, Saul seemed
(1 Sam. 1315). Saul offered the burnt offering to the Lord more afraid of the people than God (the paradox of such be-
before the Philistine battle, disobeying Gods specific com- havior is seen in Prov.29:25; Is. 51:12, 13). Arrogantly, Saul set
mands given through Samuel (1Sam. 13:9, 13). When Jonathans up a monument for himself (v.12). When confronted by Samu-
courageous attack on the Philistines created tumult in their el, Saul rationalized his sinful actions, passing blame onto the
camp, Saul called for the ark of God (LXX reads ephod) to people (vv.1821). The opinions of people were more impor
inquire of the Lord as to what to do (1Sam. 14:18). But Saul tant to Saul than genuine repentance (vv.25, 30).
The
ThePlan of Herods
Family Tree ofTemple
Saul
Abiel
(1 Sam. 14:51)
Ner
(1 Sam. 14:51)
Abner Kish
(1 Sam. 14:50) (1 Chr. 8:33)
Armoni Mephibosheth
(2 Sam. 21:8) (2 Sam. 21:8)
draw your hand. 20Then Saul and all the taken vengeance on my enemies. So none
people who were with him assembled, and of the people tasted food. 25Now all the peo-
they went to the battle; and indeed every ple of the land came to a forest; and there
mans sword was against his neighbor, and was honey on the ground. 26And when the
there was very great confusion. 21Moreover people had come into the woods, there was
the Hebrews who were with the Philistines the honey, dripping; but no one put his hand
before that time, who went up with them to his mouth, for the people feared the oath.
into the camp from the surrounding country, 27But Jonathan had not heard his father
they also joined the Israelites who were with charge the people with the oath; therefore
Saul and Jonathan. 22Likewise all the men of he stretched out the end of the rod that was
Israel who had hidden in the mountains of in his hand and dipped it in a honeycomb,
Ephraim, when they heard that the Philis- and put his hand to his mouth; and his coun-
tines fled, they also followed hard after them tenance brightened. 28Then one of the peo-
in the battle. 23So the Lord saved Israel that ple said, Your father strictly charged the
day, and the battle shifted to Beth Aven. people with an oath, saying, Cursed is the
man who eats food this day. And the peo-
Sauls Rash Oath ple were faint.
24And the men of Israel were distressed 29But Jonathan said, My father has trou-
that day, for Saul had placed the people un- bled the land. Look now, how my counte-
der oath, saying, Cursed is the man who nance has brightened because I tasted a
eats any food until evening, before I have little of this honey. 30How much better if the
WITCHCRAFT
Witchcraft is closely associated with goddess worship. Witches claim the goddess as a model for the
stages of a womans life. They maintain that the feminine life-force of the universe, the goddess, appears
in three forms: the maiden, the mother, and the crone. This triple aspect of the goddess is supposedly
intertwined with the cycle of the moon. The waxing moon is the maiden, the full moon is the mother, and
the waning moon is the crone. Witches draw meaning from the fact that the moons twenty-eight day
cycle is mirrored by the twenty-eight day menstrual cycle.
Witches characteristically belong to a covena small group of no more than thirteen members who
meet to cast spells, conduct rituals, or raise a cone of healing energy at the full moon or solstice when the
lunar or solar energies are considered to be at their high points.
White magic is somewhat related to but contrasted with black magic and blatant Satanism. Black
magic attempts to produce evil results through such methods as curses, spells, and alliance with evil
spirits. White magic tries to undo curses and spells and to use occult means (gods, demons, spirits, or
forces) for what the coven perceives to be the good of themselves or others. Rituals are used in both
black and white magic to bend psychic force to the will of those in a coven.
Witchcraft, sorcery, and magic are always condemned in Scripture (see Lev.19:26; 20:27; Deut.18:1014;
Judg.8:21, 26; 2Kin.9:22; Is.3:1823; Ezek.13:1723; Mic.5:12).
See also Gal.5:20; notes on Goddess Religion (Ex.20); The Occult (Deut.18); portrait of the Medium
of En Dor (1Sam.28)
3Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly Saul attacked the Amalekites, from Havilah
destroy all that they have, and do not spare all the way to Shur, which is east of Egypt.
them. But kill both man and woman, infant 8He also took Agag king of the Amalekites
and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and alive, and utterly destroyed all the people
donkey. with the edge of the sword. 9But Saul and
4So Saul gathered the people together
the people spared Agag and the best of the
and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred sheep, the oxen, the fatlings, the lambs, and
thousand foot soldiers and ten thousand all that was good, and were unwilling to ut-
men of Judah. 5And Saul came to a city of terly destroy them. But everything despised
Amalek, and lay in wait in the valley. and worthless, that they utterly destroyed.
6Then Saul said to the Kenites, Go, de-
part, get down from among the Amalekites,
lest I destroy you with them. For you showed Saul Rejected as King
10Now the word of the Lord came to
kindness to all the children of Israel when
they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites Samuel, saying, 11I greatly regret that I have
departed from among the Amalekites. 7And set up Saul as king, for he has turned back
15:3 The Amalekites, descendants of Esau (Gen. 36:12), tent with Scripture it must be remembered that God, while
were put under divine judgment by God after they attacked graciously longsuffering, is also just and judges sin (1Sam.
Israel at Rephidim during the time of the Exodus (Ex. 17:8 15:2, 18). Furthermore, the total circumstances surrounding
16). Saul was commanded to carry out this judgment, put- this judgment are unknown. For example, consider the ex-
ting the Amalekites under the ban (Heb. cherem). Such action tent of evil among the Amalekites. They were responsible for
meant that the city, people, animals, and possessions were the contamination of surrounding peoples, especially Israel,
devoted to the Lord for destruction (see Deut. 7:26; 12:2, 3; and they threatened painful losses of, if not extermination
20:1618). The destruction of all people and goods removed for, the nation of Israel. Since religious aspects were a part
any financial motivation for the war, making it solely a holy of almost all wars in the ancient Near East, the battlefield
war divinely planned and executed. Some are troubled that was often viewed as a place of divine retribution (see also
a loving God could give such a command. But to be consis- Rom. 9:1524).
16:2 Sauls actions had been erratic (1Sam. 14:2426), and raels next king (1Sam. 13:14). Above all else this description
Samuels concern over the danger involved in anointing meant reverencing and obeying God (see 1Sam. 2:30; 15:22).
Sauls successor is realistic. The Lord promised to lead Samuel The uniqueness of Gods perspective was stressed in Samu-
through the difficult situation (1Sam. 16:3, 12, 17). The Lord els process of reflection as he met the sons of Jesse. Initially,
gave Samuel another legitimate reason for going to Bethle- Samuel assumed the new king would look like his predecessor
hem so that the prophet would not attract attention when he (1Sam. 16:6). On the contrary, Gods concern was the heart. He
anointed David (vv.2, 3). Sacrifices were offered at different saw into the heart of the brothers (v.7; see 1Kin. 8:39; 1Chr.
places after the ark had been removed from the tabernacle. 28:9; Luke 16:15). Jesses son David was chosen because he was
Despite Samuels sadness over Sauls disobedience and rejec- a man after Gods own heart. Though chosen, David did not
tion by God and his fear of what Saul would do to him, Samuel receive the Spirit of the Lord in power until he was officially
still obeyed Gods command (vv.24; see Philem. Obedience). anointed (1Sam. 16:13).
16:11 David is introduced as a shepherd tending his fathers 16:14 Gods judgment upon Saul for his sin and lack of re-
flock. In the ancient world, shepherd was often used as a pentance was twofold. Gods Spirit departed (v.14), leaving
metaphor for a ruler. In the OT and NT, Gods people are by Saul to rule in his own strength. Saul had already chosen his
analogy described as a flock, while Gods representatives are own way when he rebelled against Gods word (vv.1315). In-
called shepherds (2Sam. 5:2; 7:7, 8; Ps. 23:1; 78:71, 72; Ezek. stead of Gods Spirit, a troubling (lit. a distressing, injuri-
34:131; John 10:118). David reflected on the model of God ous, or evil) spirit from the Lord came to Saul, causing him
Himself as a Shepherd (Ps. 23). The shepherd/flock image is to be severely miserable and depressed, even to the point of
a recurring theme associated with David, as it is with the Lord madness (vv.14, 23; see Ps. 18, Distress). That God used evil
Himself (see 1Sam. 17:15, 20, 28, 34, 40; 2Sam. 5:2; 7:8; Ezek. spirits to serve Him is seen in the OT (1Chr. 21:1). This spirit
34:23). may have been sent to humble Saul so he would turn and seek
16:12 God sought out a man after his own heart for Is- the Lords help.
DEPRESSION
mighty man of valor, a man of war, prudentgathered at Sochoh, which belongs to Judah;
in speech, and a handsome person; and the they encamped between Sochoh and Aze-
Lord is with him. kah, in Ephes Dammim. 2And Saul and the
19Therefore Saul sent messengers to Jes-
men of Israel were gathered together, and
se, and said, Send me your son David, whothey encamped in the Valley of Elah, and
is with the sheep. 20And Jesse took a don-
drew up in battle array against the Philis-
tines. 3The Philistines stood on a mountain
key loaded with bread, a skin of wine, and a
young goat, and sent them by his son Davidon one side, and Israel stood on a mountain
to Saul. 21So David came to Saul and stoodon the other side, with a valley between
before him. And he loved him greatly, and he
them.
became his armorbearer. 22Then Saul sent 4And a champion went out from the
to Jesse, saying, Please let David stand be-
camp of the Philistines, named Goliath,
fore me, for he has found favor in my sight.
from Gath, whose height was six cubits
23And so it was, whenever the spirit from
and a span. 5He had a bronze helmet on
God was upon Saul, that David would take his head, and he was armed with a coat of
a harp and play it with his hand. Then Saul
mail, and the weight of the coat was five
would become refreshed and well, and the thousand shekels of bronze. 6And he had
distressing spirit would depart from him. bronze armor on his legs and a bronze jave-
lin between his shoulders. 7Now the staff of
David and Goliath his spear was like a weavers beam, and his
17 Now the Philistines gathered their iron spearhead weighed six hundred shek-
armies together to battle, and were els; and a shield-bearer went before him.
17:8 One form of warfare between nations during this peri- tunity to achieve victory by relying upon himself instead of
od was to select a warrior from one nation who would duel God (compare 1Sam. 13; 14, especially 13:13, note). David, the
with the champion of the other nation. The losers nation shepherd, accepted the blasphemous challenge of the more
was to submit to that of the winner. Often, the champion was than nine-foot-tall giant, Goliath (1Sam. 17:32). The success
the king of the nation since he was the chief of the army and of David was not his own. Like Jonathan before him (1Sam.
normally a strong warrior. In the battle between the Israel- 14:6), David put his faith in God (1Sam. 17:4547; see 1Sam.
ites and Philistines, Saul himself might have been expected 14:6, 45). God was the source of Davids accomplishment
to confront Goliath. But once again Saul forfeited an oppor- (1Sam. 17:50).
17:45 The Lord of Hosts (see 1Sam. 1:11; 4:4; 15:2). This ma- 17:46 David maintained a perspective focused on the Person
jestic title for God is used in the book which records the be- of God rather than upon the nine-foot-tall giant before him.
ginnings of Israels monarchy. This is a fitting name for Israels Though Goliath was carrying an impressive sword, spear, and
true King, whose sovereignty could never be overshadowed javelin, David was armed in the name of the Lord of Hosts
by an earthly ruler (Josh. 5:14, 15; 2Sam. 5:10; 7:26; 1Chr. 17:24; (v. 45). In OT times, the name of a person represented the
Ps. 24:810; Is. 5:7; 6:3, 5; 24:23; Mal. 1:14). Since hosts can totality of his being. To David, the Almighty God dwarfed the
mean celestial bodies or the armies of heaven or earth, this giant (vv.26, 36). By claiming the Lord of Hosts as his strength,
term describes all the powers under Gods command through- David declared that Goliath was confronting God Himself
out creation, as well as identifying His military role as chief of (v.47).
the armies of Israel.
as his own soul. 2Saul took him that day, and the distressing spirit from God came upon
would not let him go home to his fathers Saul, and he prophesied inside the house. So
house anymore. 3Then Jonathan and David David played music with his hand, as at other
made a covenant, because he loved him as times; but there was a spear in Sauls hand.
11And Saul cast the spear, for he said, I will
his own soul. 4And Jonathan took off the
robe that was on him and gave it to David, pin David to the wall! But David escaped his
with his armor, even to his sword and his presence twice.
bow and his belt. 12Now Saul was afraid of David, because
5So David went out wherever Saul sent the Lord was with him, but had departed
him, and behaved wisely. And Saul set him from Saul. 13Therefore Saul removed him
17:55 Sauls ignorance of Davids father was not unreason- were evidenced in their purest form through the lives of Jona-
able, though it appears to conflict with 1Samuel 16:1423. Saul than and David (see Luke 1, Friendship). The sober sincerity of
was first introduced to David as a shepherd harpist whose mu- this relationship was demonstrated by its being stated, then
sic soothed Sauls troubled soul (1Sam. 16:1623). At that time, reaffirmed four times (1Sam. 18:3; 20:16, 42; 23:18). Though
Sauls only interest in David may have been in one who met his the covenant was mutually binding, the circumstances put a
need. Now in a different context Saul was very curious about heavier burden on Jonathan (see Jonathans sober vow, 1Sam.
David, the warrior (three times Saul states his desire to know 20:13). As a covenant pledge, Jonathan gave his robe (a sym-
the identity of this young man, 1Sam. 17:55, 56, 58; see Sauls bol of the kingdom, see 1Sam. 15:27, 28), along with his weap-
policy in 1Sam. 14:52). Saul was interested in Davids family ons, to David. This relatively common practice in antiquity
and perhaps his social standing. Also Saul may have forgotten indicated transfer of position. Jonathan was likely signifying
Davids fathers name in the period between 1Samuel 16 and acknowledgment and acceptance of Gods choice of David as
17. Perhaps Saul was eager to learn more of Davids background king by transferring, with complete disregard of self, his place
after his victory over Goliath. The conversation between Saul as heir to the throne to David.
and David was longer than a mere answer to Sauls question 18:5 This significant summary statement obviously post-
would require (1Sam. 18:1). dates the arrival home of the army from the battlefield where
18:1 The close bond of friendship between David and Jona- David killed Goliath (vv.69). Davids increasing popularity
than is described in the phrase, the soul of Jonathan was knit and military success is recorded as Sauls schizophrenic be-
to the soul of David (v.1, Heb. nephesh, lit. soul bound with havior is revealed. Sauls attitude toward David had changed
soul). The word for love here (Heb. ahab) is a term used in from one of love (1Sam. 16:21) to one of hate (1Sam. 18:11).
political, commercial, and friendship covenants (see 1Kin. 5:1 Chapter 18 presents Saul as jealous and afraid of David, even
for ahab in a treaty/covenant). It bound together the two par- desiring to destroy him at times (vv.8, 9, 11, 12, 15). But this
ties in loyalty and reciprocal responsibilitya relationship in verse indicates there were times when Saul appreciated David
which both parties could depend upon each other. The word enough to reward his service. Davids continued triumphs as
is fitting in this context where Jonathan made a covenant a warrior are summarized using the root that combines the
of friendship with David (1 Sam. 18:3). The characteristics virtues of success and wisdom (Heb. skl; see vv.14, 15, 30) as
of commitment, loyalty (1Sam. 19:1, 4, 5, 7), affection, self- characteristic aspects of Davids victories.
sacrifice, and responsibility understood in such covenants 18:10 See 1Samuel 16:14, note.
Michal (lit. Who is like God?), the younger daughter of Saul, was in love with David. Saul sought
to use this as a snare to lure David to his death (1Sam. 18:21). David accepted her love to better his
position before Saul (1Sam. 18:26).
Saul feared David, but when he sent soldiers to Davids house to kill him, Michal lied and
schemed in order to save him. However, by helping David to escape, she lost him. Later, Michal
was given away by her father to another man as wife.
During the years of their separation, there is no record of Davids concern for Michal or of any
attempt on his part to contact her. Fourteen years later and seven years after the death of Saul,
David was still not king over all of Israel. As a condition of a treaty with Abner, David demanded
the return of Michal in order to stabilize his position over the kingdom. Once again, Michal was
used for political advantage. Her brother, Ishbosheth, took Michal from her sobbing husband,
Paltiel, and gave her back to David.
In Michals final encounter with David, she accused him of acting unlike a king when the ark
was returned to Jerusalem (2Sam. 6:20). Her scorn for her husband, who also happened to be
Gods chosen king, resulted in the loss of her ability to bear children, the ultimate curse for any
Hebrew woman (2Sam. 6:23).
See also 1Sam. 14:49; 19:818; 25:43, 44; 2Sam. 3:1216; 6:1223; notes on Bitterness (Heb. 12);
Marriage (2Sam. 6); Wives (Prov.31)
from his presence, and made him his cap- David, that she was given to Adriel the Me-
tain over a thousand; and he went out and holathite as a wife.
came in before the people. 14And David be- 20Now Michal, Sauls daughter, loved Da-
haved wisely in all his ways, and the Lord vid. And they told Saul, and the thing pleased
was with him. 15Therefore, when Saul saw him. 21So Saul said, I will give her to him,
that he behaved very wisely, he was afraid that she may be a snare to him, and that the
of him. 16But all Israel and Judah loved Da- hand of the Philistines may be against him.
vid, because he went out and came in before Therefore Saul said to David a second time,
them. You shall be my son-in-law today.
22And Saul commanded his servants,
David Marries Michal Communicate with David secretly, and say,
17Then Saul said to David, Here is my Look, the king has delight in you, and all his
older daughter Merab; I will give her to you servants love you. Now therefore, become
as a wife. Only be valiant for me, and fight the kings son-in-law.
23So Sauls servants spoke those words in
the Lords battles. For Saul thought, Let my
hand not be against him, but let the hand of the hearing of David. And David said, Does
the Philistines be against him. it seem to you a light thing to be a kings
18So David said to Saul, Who am I, and son-in-law, seeing I am a poor and light-
what is my life or my fathers family in Israel, ly esteemed man? 24And the servants of
that I should be son-in-law to the king? Saul told him, saying, In this manner David
19But it happened at the time when Merab, spoke.
Sauls daughter, should have been given to 25Then Saul said, Thus you shall say to
18:25 A snare turns to an advantage. Saul offered his malicious pride (vv.17, 19, 21, 25) and Davids humility (vv.18,
daughter at a bride price intended to cost David his life 23; see also Prov.29:23). A tragic aspect of Davids success
(vv.21, 25; see Michal). Yet God protected David (v.27; see is that it sealed Sauls hatred and fear of David (a fear with
also 2Chr. 16:9), turning Sauls evil plot (1Sam. 18:25) into an deep psychological roots stemming from Sauls awareness
advantage through which Davids prestige grew (vv.27, 28, that the Lord had departed from him and was with David,
30). The event also illustrates the contrast between Sauls 1Sam. 18:12, 29).
in the field where you are, and I will speak see David, saying, Bring him up to me in the
with my father about you. Then what I ob- bed, that I may kill him. 16And when the
serve, I will tell you. messengers had come in, there was the im-
4Thus Jonathan spoke well of David to age in the bed, with a cover of goats hair for
Saul his father, and said to him, Let not the his head. 17Then Saul said to Michal, Why
king sin against his servant, against David, have you deceived me like this, and sent my
because he has not sinned against you, and enemy away, so that he has escaped?
because his works have been very good to- And Michal answered Saul, He said to
ward you. 5For he took his life in his hands me, Let me go! Why should I kill you?
and killed the Philistine, and the Lord 18So David fled and escaped, and went
brought about a great deliverance for all Is- to Samuel at Ramah, and told him all that
19:1824 Sauls prophesying. The passage demonstrates gests that a group of prophets under the leadership of Samuel
Gods power over the hearts of individuals to guide them at may have resided in Naioth (a common building or a town,
will. Thus, not only were Sauls messengers (vv.20, 21), and though Samuel had his own house at Ramah, 1 Sam. 7:17).
finally Saul himself (vv.22, 23), unable to capture David, but This is the initial hint of an association or School of Prophets,
their evil purpose was reversed to bring praise to God. The which possibly continued into the days of Elijah and Elisha as
events demonstrated to Saul that David was Gods choice to the sons of the prophets (see 1Kin. 20:35, 41; 2Kin. 2:315;
be king. Davids future was indicated not just by Samuels word 4:1, 38; 5:22; 6:17; 9:1; Amos 7:14). This group apparently ex-
or by Davids popularity with the people but by the expressed isted to disciple men called of God (some for the prophetic of-
will and purpose of God. Before the call of Samuel as prophet, fice). The times of Samuel and those of the prophets Elijah and
Gods word was rare in Israel (1Sam. 3:1). The passage also sug- Elisha were both characterized by rampant sin and idolatry.
20
10Then David said to Jonathan, Who will
hen David fled from Naioth in Ra-
T
mah, and went and said to Jonathan, tell me, or what if your father answers you
What have I done? What is my iniquity, and roughly?
11And Jonathan said to David, Come, let
what is my sin before your father, that he
seeks my life? us go out into the field. So both of them
2So Jonathan said to him, By no means! went out into the field. 12Then Jonathan said
You shall not die! Indeed, my father will do to David: The Lord God of Israel is witness!
nothing either great or small without first When I have sounded out my father some-
telling me. And why should my father hide time tomorrow, or the third day, and indeed
this thing from me? It is not so! there is good toward David, and I do not send
3Then David took an oath again, and said, to you and tell you, 13may the Lord do so and
Your father certainly knows that I have much more to Jonathan. But if it pleases my
found favor in your eyes, and he has said, 19:24aCompare 1Samuel 10:12
20:5 A joyous celebration took place at the appearance of David (1Sam. 16:18; 17:37; 18:12, 14, 28), Jonathan prayed, the
the new moon (Num. 10:10). Burnt offerings were offered in Lord be with you as He has been with my father. This indi-
the midst of the feast as a monthly reminder that the Lord cates Jonathans recognition that David, not Jonathan, would
was their God (Num. 28:14). When Samuel was a boy, the be the next king, making Jonathans love for and protection
normal place of the feast was Shiloh, the place of the taber- of David even more remarkable. Reminding David twice of
nacle (1Sam. 1:3). But in Davids day, since Shiloh had been their everlasting covenant of friendship (1Sam. 20:17, 23; see
destroyed, the sacrifices were offered in the hometowns of 1Sam. 18:3), Jonathan asked that it be extended to include
the celebrants. that David would never cut off his kindness to Jonathans line
20:13 The close relationship between Jonathan and David (1Sam. 20:15; 24:21; 2Sam. 9:3). Since mutual responsibilities
was underscored when the stark reality that Saul was seeking were involved in such covenants, Jonathan asked David to
to take Davids life became evident to David (vv.117; 1Sam. vow agreement. For both men the Lord was between you and
19:10, 11) but not to Jonathan (1Sam. 20:2). Even so Jonathan me forever as witness and judge should one of them break
promised to be loyal. His dependence upon the sovereignty this covenant (see v.23; Gen. 31:4850). David kept his vow
of God in terms of the immediate danger facing David was of kindness in his treatment of Jonathans son, Mephibosheth
evident (v.22). Agreeing with others that the Lord was with (2Sam. 9:37; 21:7).
21:1 Nob, a city of priests (1Sam. 22:19), may have been the who extended the massacre to all Nob as a city under the ban
location of the tabernacle, though not the ark of the covenant (see 1Sam. 15:3, note). This was a further fulfillment of the
(see 1Sam. 7:2), and the site of legal worship after the destruc- prophecy against Elis house (1Sam. 2:3133; 4:11, 18; 1Kin.
tion of Shiloh (see 1Sam. 4:22). When David fled from Saul and 2:26, 27). When David learned of the disaster through Abiathar,
came to Nob, Ahimelech the priest was fearful and made anx- he confessed that he was ultimately responsible for it. This
ious inquiry of David because he recognized Davids authority. is a tragic example of how sin affects others. David assured
Why David resorted to deception at this point is not clear. He Abiathar safety because David was sure of divine protection
may have responded in panic either to get Ahimelech to supply (1Sam. 22:23).
his needs and/or to protect the priest from later accusations 21:4 The holy bread or consecrated bread was set apart for
concerning knowledge of Davids flight. The brief mention of use in the tabernacle and was only to be eaten by the priests
Doeg anticipated his future merciless role (1Sam. 22:18, 19). In (Ex. 25:30; Lev.24:59). Ahimelech apparently realized that
the twisted mind of the rejected king the presence of David at moral obligation to preserve Davids life superseded the cer-
Nob and the help Ahimelech gave David seemed a conspiracy emonial regulation concerning the bread, a conclusion Jesus
(1Sam. 22:8, 13, 16, 17). With total contempt for the priest- honored in the NT (Matt. 12:3, 4; Mark 2:25, 26). The issue here
hood, Saul called for death of the priests (1Sam. 22:1618). His does not involve Gods moral law, which is immutable. After
Israelite servants refused such a heinous order, but there was Davids men were ceremonially clean (see Lev.15:16), Ahime-
no hesitancy on the part of the Edomite Doeg (1Sam. 20:18), lech offered David the consecrated bread.
22:2 The early band of men drawn to David were united by all Moabite king to care for his father and mother are of special
types of adverse circumstances. God later brought an army of interest in light of the fact that his great-grandmother Ruth
valiant warriors to David (see 1Chr. 12:8). was from Moab, meaning that David probably had family ties
22:3 Davids journey to Moab and his request of the there.
23:9 The use of the ephod helped David realize his danger- the promises of God, reminding David of the Lords concern
ous situation. The yes or no questions assume the use of that Saul would not find him, and of the fact that he, David,
the Urim and Thummim (see Ex. 28:15; Deut. 33:8, notes). This would be king over Israel (see 2Pet. 1, The Promises of God).
shows that God knows all the alternatives and is able to reveal Jonathans selfless perspective is an OT example of Philippians
them. 2:24, and his friendship for David embodies the concept of
23:15 Jonathan encouraged David. Jonathan came to David Proverbs 18:24. After making a covenant together, they parted,
in the wilderness of Ziph in a forest at a time when David was perhaps never to see each other again since no other meetings
in great need of encouragement that Gods will concerning are recorded. They modeled a friendship to be emulated by all
him would be fulfilled (v.17). Jonathan strengthened David by generations (see Luke 1, Friendship).
24:1 En Gedi was a lovely oasis with a freshwater spring David felt he had no right to lay a hand against the Lords
above the bleak shores of the Dead Sea. The area around the anointed, a phrase used repeatedly (1Sam. 24:6, 10; 26:9, 11,
spring stands in stark contrast to the surrounding desert. The 16, 23). Davids heart troubled him after he cut off a corner
limestone rock in the region is permeated with caves, provid- of Sauls robe (1Sam. 24:5), for David considered this act as
ing good places to hide. harm done to the king himself, and therefore sin on Davids
24:6 Davids reverence for God and His sovereignty over part. Restraining his men, David solemnly vowed he would
the affairs of mankind and history influenced his actions never do harm to his master, for in no way should he harm
even in the midst of severe persecution (see 1Sam. 24; 26). one whom God had placed in authority (v.7). In no way did
To Davids men, Sauls presence inside the same cave in which this attitude toward Saul condone the wretched sinfulness
they were hiding was a door of opportunity from the Lord to of Sauls life. Rather, out of respect for God, David refused
get rid of their enemy (1Sam. 24:4); but to David, Saul was to take matters into his own hands (vv.12, 15; 1Sam. 26:9);
the Lords anointed, both by divine appointment and human instead he trusted God to bring about justice (Deut. 32:35;
proclamation (v.6; see also 1Sam. 9:16; 10:1, 24; 11:15). Thus Rom. 12:1721).
25:13 Davids impassioned desire to take immediate ven- she acted with speed to prepare generous supplies for David
geance upon Nabal for his insult and cruelty to David and his and his men with the hope of intercepting them en route. En-
men, if carried out, would have caused David to sin against countering the angry army of 400 men, Abigail courageously
the Lord and His people. God preserved David from shedding demonstrated wisdom, respect, and submissiveness as she
innocent blood (a major theme in 1Sam. 2426 but perhaps admonished David not to avenge himself and blot his career
most obvious in 1 Sam. 25) through the swift and wise in- with blood guilt (vv.26, 28, 30, 31). She reminded David that
tervention of Nabals wife Abigail, a woman described as he was the Lords anointed, fighting the Lords battles, and
beautiful (lit. lovely in form, the same phrase describ- thus under Gods protection (vv.28, 29). Davids teachable
ing Rachel in Gen. 29:17 and Esther in Esth. 2:7) and good in spirit, illustrated both by his listening to Abigails words as
understanding (2Chr. 30:22; Ps. 111:10; Prov.13:15). Sensing well as his heeding her advice, is admirable here. David hon-
the impending disaster that would come after Nabal repaid ored Abigail by stating that she had been sent by the Lord to
Davids good with evil (1Sam. 25:10, 11), a young man in Na- keep him from sin (vv.3234). As a responsible wife, Abigail
bals household came to Abigail explaining the praiseworthy returned to her husband and at an appropriate time told him
behavior of David and his men (vv.15, 16) and imploring her to all she had done, willing to accept any possible consequences.
right the wrong of her husband (vv.14, 17). As a godly wife, Ab- God demonstrated to David that He is faithful to avenge
igail was first responsible to God, then to her husband. Thus wrong in striking Nabal dead (v.38).
Abigail was the intelligent and beautiful wife (1Sam. 25:3) of Nabal, a wealthy, foolish scoundrel
who was harsh and overbearing (1Sam. 25:3, 17). Although many women are in unhappy
marriages by their own choices, Abigail probably entered this union with such a difficult man
through no choice of her own, since most marriages in her day were arranged by parents. This
woman of faith acted humbly and wisely in giving David and his men food to save the lives of her
household.
After Nabal rudely insulted the future king of Israel and his men, David reacted swiftly, intent
on hotheaded vengeance. Forewarned by a servant, Abigail moved with perception and precision
to try to avert the extermination of the entire household. She intercepted David with humility
and warm hospitality. Her voice was a call to reason, and her manner was altogether disarming.
She used all her creativity to minimize the damage done by her foolish husband. In going against
Nabals wishes, she acted to save his life.
How did she dissuade David and his men? She could have been a resentful wife, looking for
ways to blame her husband, but her speech was artfully persuasive and honest. She showed
deference for her husband by claiming that it was her own oversight that Davids men saw Nabal
instead of her, perhaps suggesting that she was not available for hospitality (1Sam. 25:25). Her
words were not a betrayal but rather a tactful confession that defused Davids anger. She made
no effort to deceive her husband but chose wisely the time to give him a full account of what
she had done (1Sam. 25:36, 37). Her conversation with David showed respect for his position
and knowledge of his character and actions, resulting in the future kings pronouncement of a
threefold blessing: praise to God, gratitude for her advice, and thanksgiving for Abigail herself
(1Sam. 25:32, 33).
When David heard that Nabal had died, he was greatly relieved that he had allowed God to
take the vengeance. He also wasted no time in asking Abigail to continue to bless his life as his
own wife. She was the one to whom David said, I... respected your person (1Sam. 25:35). She
had earned from him respect, and she illustrates for wives today vital principles of restraint and
proper priorities, as well as the determination to make the best out of a difficult situation.
See also 2Sam. 3:3; notes on Change Points in Life (Eccl. 3); Decision Making (1Cor. 8)
to his men, Every man gird on his sword. two hundred loaves of bread, two skins of
So every man girded on his sword, and Da- wine, five sheep already dressed, five seahs
vid also girded on his sword. And about four of roasted grain, one hundred clusters of
hundred men went with David, and two hun- raisins, and two hundred cakes of figs, and
dred stayed with the supplies. loaded them on donkeys. 19And she said to
14Now one of the young men told Abi- her servants, Go on before me; see, I am
gail, Nabals wife, saying, Look, David sent coming after you. But she did not tell her
messengers from the wilderness to greet husband Nabal.
20So it was, as she rode on the donkey,
our master; and he reviled them. 15But the
men were very good to us, and we were not that she went down under cover of the hill;
hurt, nor did we miss anything as long as and there were David and his men, coming
we accompanied them, when we were in down toward her, and she met them. 21Now
the fields. 16They were a wall to us both by David had said, Surely in vain I have pro-
night and day, all the time we were with them tected all that this fellow has in the wilder-
keeping the sheep. 17Now therefore, know ness, so that nothing was missed of all that
and consider what you will do, for harm is belongs to him. And he has repaid me evil for
determined against our master and against good. 22May God do so, and more also, to the
all his household. For he is such a scoundrela enemies of David, if I leave one male of all
that one cannot speak to him. who belong to him by morning light.
18T hen Abigail made haste and took 25:17aLiterally son of Belial
LEADERSHIP
AN AWESOME RESPONSIBILITY
Jewish culture accepted women in positions of leadership. Though highly valued and given a new
dignity by Christ, the roles of women were different from those of the men Christ selected for leadership
positions. No woman was called, commissioned, or named as one of the twelve apostles. Yet women gave
to Christ, served Him, fellowshiped with Him, learned from Him, prayed for Him, and testified of Him as
the Savior. They provided leadership through their service.
Leadership is an awesome responsibility, demanding spiritual preparation grounded in consistent
personal devotional time (Matt.6:33). Leaders must also seek godly counsel (Prov.15:22). They must
work willingly and energetically (Eccl.9:10). Essential ingredients in leadership include creativity,
encouragement of others (Prov.15:23; 25:11), inspiration (Prov.16:24; 17:22), expressions of gratitude
(Ps.13:6; 69:30; Eph.5:20), and a servants heart (Prov.3:27; Matt.23:11).
Abigails unique leadership of her household staff included a servants heart and boldness, which was
tempered with restraint and discretion (1Sam.25:2333). Abigail exerted great influence over David when
she persuaded him not to kill Nabal. In fact, David later recognized that Abigail changed the direction
of his life. People must consistently be more important than tasks. Self-sacrifice, gentleness, service
without expected reward, patience, kindness, nurturing of relationships, mercyall these qualities are a
part of the Lords leadership. We see exemplified in the Lord Himself those qualities which are necessary
in all godly leaders.
See also Ex.15:20, 21; charts on Deborah: A Leader of Israel; Esther: A Leader of the Jews; Spiritual Gifts of
Women in the Bible (1Cor.12); notes on Boldness (Prov.28); Encouragement (Eph.4); Spiritual Gifts (Rom.12);
Womens Ministries series (John4; Acts2; 1Cor.11; Eph.2; 1Tim.3; Titus2); portraits of Athaliah (2Kin.11);
Deborah (Judg.4); Miriam (Ex.15)
23Now when Abigail saw David, she dis- let your enemies and those who seek harm
mounted quickly from the donkey, fell on for my lord be as Nabal. 27And now this pres-
her face before David, and bowed down to ent which your maidservant has brought to
the ground. 24So she fell at his feet and said: my lord, let it be given to the young men who
On me, my lord, on me let this iniquity be! follow my lord. 28Please forgive the trespass
And please let your maidservant speak in of your maidservant. For the Lord will cer-
your ears, and hear the words of your maid- tainly make for my lord an enduring house,
servant. 25Please, let not my lord regard this because my lord fights the battles of the
scoundrel Nabal. For as his name is, so is he: Lord, and evil is not found in you through-
Nabala is his name, and folly is with him! But out your days. 29Yet a man has risen to pur-
I, your maidservant, did not see the young sue you and seek your life, but the life of
men of my lord whom you sent. 26Now there- my lord shall be bound in the bundle of the
fore, my lord, as the Lord lives and as your living with the Lord your God; and the lives
soul lives, since the Lord has held you back of your enemies He shall sling out, as from
from coming to bloodshed and from aveng- the pocket of a sling. 30And it shall come to
ing yourself with your own hand, now then, 25:25aLiterally Fool
25:27 In the wilderness of Paran, where David fled after saying used by Abigail to picture the Lords care for David. This
Samuel died, roving bands of robbers were very common. Even phrase is often found on Jewish tombstones referring to life
to the present day, groups of men protect the life and property beyond the grave. The image comes from the custom of bun-
of wilderness dwellers in return for gifts. Even during Davids dling valuable possessions to keep them from being broken or
most difficult times, he took upon himself the care and protec- damaged. The picture is one of a precious jewel, carefully tied
tion of his countrymen (vv.7, 8, 15, 16). up in a bundle in order to keep it secure and safe. Abigail is
25:29 Bound in the bundle of the living is a graphic Hebrew saying that David is in Gods bundle and is securely protected.
27:6 Ziklag, originally assigned to the tribe of Simeon (Josh. Achish, the king of Gath, knowing the hostility between Saul
19:15) but later incorporated into the Negev province of Ju- and David, brought David under his protection as a vassal
dah (Josh. 15:2031), was located about 15 miles southeast (v. 5). Achish gave the unoccupied Philistine city of Ziklag
of Gath. During the reign of Saul, Ziklag was under Philistine to David as a gift for Davids presumed loyalty (v.6). The city
control. When David despaired after running from Saul for a became the base from which David and his men successful-
long time, he concluded that Saul would kill him. So David ly attacked various groups who threatened Judahs southern
left Israel and went to the land of the Philistines (1Sam. 27:1). borders (vv.8, 9, 11).
Sauls desperate attempt to learn the future on the eve of battle introduces the medium of
En Dor in Scripture. The medium, a mere prop on historys stage, set the scene for Sauls
final disobedience to God, which ended in judgment (1Chr. 10:13, 14). There was a tragic
submissiveness in her repeated compliance to Sauls evil request.
The medium lived in eleventh-century-b.c. En Dor, a Canaanite city three miles southwest
of Mt. Tabor and within the territory of Manassehs tribe. She practiced divination, a common
occupation among ancient Near Eastern women. During Sauls time, the term medium meant
one who consulted the dead on behalf of the living. Witchcraft had flourished in the nations
Israel had been commanded to expel during the conquest of the Promised Land. Manasseh,
however, had not driven the Canaanites from En Dor (Josh. 17:12, 13).
Though the medium likely was pagan, she knew her craft was forbidden. All forms of
witchcraft had been condemned by God (Ex. 22:18; Lev.19:31; 20:6, 27; Deut. 18:1012, 14); Saul
himself had exercised civil authority and driven mediums from the land (1Sam. 28:3). Yet this
medium was still in Israel, and her presence was known (1Sam. 28:7).
The woman was cautious and suspicious of a trap when asked to bring up Samuel
(1Sam.28:9). But she quickly complied with Sauls request after being assured of personal safety.
Gods Word was not her authority. Her fearful shock at the sight of Samuel implies that she had
never experienced the appearance of such a figure. With sudden clairvoyance, she recognized
Saul and boldly challenged the king with his own deception (v.12). Again Saul assured her safety,
and she responded to his request.
When Saul fell to the ground in despair, the woman showed natural sympathy as she prepared
food to try to revive his strength (v.22). As she coaxed Saul to respond, she twice referred to
herself with the submissive phrase your maidservant (vv.21, 22). Then she put forth her best
hospitality in preparing a royal meal. The medium of En Dor stands, however, as an example of
one who, while doing good in practicing human kindness, did evil in disobeying God and sinned
in so doing. She will be remembered as one who chose to be an accomplice to King Saul in his
personal disobedience to God.
See also 1Chr. 10:13, 14; notes on The Occult (Deut. 18); Witchcraft (1Sam. 15)
strength in him, for he had eaten no food all unleavened bread from it. 25So she brought
day or all night. it before Saul and his servants, and they ate.
21And the woman came to Saul and saw Then they rose and went away that night.
that he was severely troubled, and said to
him, Look, your maidservant has obeyed ThePhilistines Reject David
your voice, and I have put my life in my
hands and heeded the words which you
spoke to me. 22Now therefore, please, heed
29 hen the Philistines gathered togeth-
T
er all their armies at Aphek, and the
Israelites encamped by a fountain which is
also the voice of your maidservant, and let in Jezreel. 2And the lords of the Philistines
me set a piece of bread before you; and eat, passed in review by hundreds and by thou-
that you may have strength when you go on sands, but David and his men passed in
your way. review at the rear with Achish. 3Then the
23But he refused and said, I will not eat.
princes of the Philistines said, What are
So his servants, together with the wom- these Hebrews doing here?
an, urged him; and he heeded their voice. And Achish said to the princes of the Phi-
Then he arose from the ground and sat on listines, Is this not David, the servant of Saul
the bed. 24Now the woman had a fatted calf king of Israel, who has been with me these
in the house, and she hastened to kill it. And days, or these years? And to this day I have
she took flour and kneaded it, and baked found no fault in him since he defected to me.
30:6 With the devastating scene of nothing but their burned of trials God is trustworthy (1Sam. 23:27, 28; 25:39). David had
city before them and with the loss of their families, the grief of developed within himself a pattern for strength because he
Davids men was so overwhelming that they wanted to stone had come to know God (see Ps. 34; 54; 56; 59). Knowledge of
David. David had faced countless trials before. There was a God makes no difference in a life unless it is lived out. Now in
purpose for Davids trials in that they made real what David be- this ultimate crisis, David strengthened himself in the Lord
lieved (see Ps. 11, Testing). David had learned that in the midst his God.