Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marvin Grossman
University of South Florida
Children who are left alone to draw what they like develop a
store of knowledge which enables them to reach their final stage
of self-taught art. From that point they may develop into gifted
artists, unspoiled. Most children, however, lose interest in drawing
after the first few years of school because they are not given this
chance to develop freely.
421
She added that when a child reaches school age he has developed a style
of perceptual learning.
In Toward a Theory of Instruction, Bruner (1960, p. 29) wrote:
" . . . unless certain basic skills are mastered, later, more elaborated ones
become increasingly out of reach." An art educator, Salome (1966, p. 28)
expressed a similar concern: "a wealth of training and experience contri
bute to an artist's ability to perceive subtle visual relationships and
transmit them into aesthetic forms." He suggested that without special
instruction, young children fail to develop fully their visual perceptual
skills and that such deficiencies influence the way children respond to
and organize stimuli.
Research by such psychologists as Gibson and Gibson (1955), Harris
(1963), and Wiktin, et al. (1962) supports the theory that learning is an
important variable in the development of perceptual functioning. More
pertinent to art education are studies by Nelson and Flannery (1967),
Lewis and Livson (1967), and Salome (1964). These studies indicate that
some types of learning experiences are more effective than others in de
veloping children's abilities to handle visual information in their draw
ings. Nelson and Flannery exposed groups of six- and seven-year-olds to
six different types of drawing instruction. The effectiveness of the dif
ferent types of instruction was assessed by having the children draw a
lozenge in eight successive trials.
The children were assigned to six equal-sized groups on the basis of
group intelligence scores and a sample reproduction of the lozenge. Each
group received a different treatment: in group one, border characteristics
were emphasized; the children were asked to follow the border of a line
drawing of the lozenge with their finger. In group two the children cut
the lozenge out of a stimulus sheet; attention to shape was emphasized.
In group three, the children were helped to make rudimentary analysis of
the lozenge in terms of proportional characteristics. In group four, each
422
child was asked to criticize his product after each drawing trial using
the example as a referent. Group five was simply asked to draw the lozenge
as it appeared on the model sheet: this was a control for practice. The
children in group six made copies of their first drawings, the only one
made while looking at the model. While most of the instruction groups im-
proved, the greatest and most reliable improvement occurred in group two.
The instructions to group two emphasized the shape of the lozenge, by
having the children cut out the lozenge from a stimulus. Although the
authors did not mention it, this strategy would emphasize the border of the
lozenge. When the children cut out the shape, they would have to attend
to the edges. Generally, the children reacted differently to the various types
of instruction; this difference suggests that the most effective instructional
procedure might include a variety of analytic procedures.
A study of the development of the child's ability to represent spatial
concepts was conducted by Lewis and Livson (1967). They found that
children from grades one through six discovered progressively adequate
means of depicting three-dimensional objects. When the youngest children
were asked to draw a three-dimensional geometric figure such as a cube,
they commonly drew a square. Children a bit older produced a great vari-
ety of drawings that showed several sides of the figure in one plane. The
next oldest group drew several sides of the figure in space but incorrectly
related. Finally, the oldest children began to represent accurately the
spatial relationships in one- or two-point perspective. The authors reported
that the children's abilities to make judgments of the adequacy of a parti-
cular graphic equivalent seems to partially account for their developing
ability to depict spatial concepts. They indicated that tasks might be
designed to speed up a child's development by presenting him with drawing
problems that require him to search for and judge the adequacy of two-di-
mensional equivalents of three-dimensional forms. Lewis and Livson
concluded that the development of means of depicting three-dimensional
objects within the limits of a two-dimensional medium can be viewed as an
individual's response to a particular task, and that instruction and environ-
mental influences can account for change.
Salome (1965) investigated the effects of perceptual training on
fourth- and fifth-grade children's drawings. In an experimental and control-
group design, the experimentals were given training that directed their
attention to visual cues located in the contours of models of a lamp, truck,
and armadillo; the control groups received conventional instruction in
drawing the same stimulus objects presented in the experimental classes.
The drawings were analyzed on a fifteen-point rating scale composed of
three variables: (1) The degree to which the drawings represented the
stimulus objects based on the amount of information included in the draw-
423
ings; (2) closure-clarity judgments were based upon the extent to which
the form and its component parts, relevant to the object, were enclosed
by lines; and (3) proportion-judgments were based on the correspondents of
the proportions of the stimulus object to the drawing.
The results of the training in Salome's study of fourth graders were
inconclusive. Examining the individual drawings of each object, only the
experimental group ratings of the truck drawings showed a significant
improvement. When the drawing scores of all the objects were combined, a
significant difference between control and experimental groups appeared in
favor of the perceptual training group, suggesting a cumulative treatment
effect. The fifth-grade results were more conclusive: significant differ-
ences in favor of the experimental treatment were reported for individual
and combined drawings. Salome concluded that perceptual training relevant
to the utilization of visual cues located along contour lines does increase
the amount of visual information fifth-grade children include in their
drawings of visual objects. These studies and investigations by Dubin
(1946), Douglas and Schwartz (1967), and others seem to strongly indicate
that young children's artistic and perceptual abilities can be influenced
by instruction.
424
and tried to elicit verbal observations from the children about the ceramic
pieces. At the conclusion of the study the children were able to comprehend
and interpret these art ideas in their own clay products. They were also
able to describe and discuss ceramic works in an art context.
There seems to be little disagreement that more elaborate verbal and
visual concepts help children develop more complex art expressions. McFee
(1961, p. 201) pointed out that when children are motivated to look for
relationships and patterns, variations in form, line, color, and texture, their
perceptual skills should develop.
Wachowiak and Ramsay (1965, pp. 25-27) in their text, Emphasis: Art,
suggested a method of helping children develop mere elaborate perceptions.
They posited that the teacher should build art experiences around things
that can be touched, studied, explored, understood, and expressed. They
added that the child should be encouraged to draw directly from nature and,
as a consequence, this sensitive observation can be the basis for a creative
interpretation of the world around him.
Research by Torrance recognized the importance of manipulation of
objects in creative and inventive activities. He reported (1963, pp. 110-117):
Harris (1963) cited two studies that affirm the influence of kines-
thetic exploration on cognition. Mott (1945) with children, and Geek
(1947) with college students showed that by adding kinesthetic experience
to visual and auditory impressions the quality of the subject's drawings
were improved. Mott had the children exercise parts of their bodies as
a group "game" before drawing the human figure. As the children went
through the motor activities, they verbalized their movements, e.g., "this
is my head, I nod it," etc. Drawings made after these activities showed
that the exercised part was not only more likely to be included but that
it was drawn with more care for details. Geek's study emphasized specific
tactual and kinesthetic experiences by having the students manually
explore a modeled human head before sketching it.
The studies reviewed in this paper suggest that an art-teaching strategy
for young children should develop children's cognitive and sensory ex-
ploration abilities. It seems that an effective way of developing young
425
References
Bland, J. C. Art of the young child. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1960.
Bloom, B. Stability and change in human characteristics. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, 1964.
Bruner, J. S. The process of instruction. New York: Vintage Books, 1960.
*These studies were part of the activities of the Research and Development Center in
Educational Stimulation, University of Georgia, pursuant to a contract with the United
States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education, under pro-
visions of the Cooperative Research Program, Center No. 5-0250, Contract No. OE
6-10-061.
426
AUTHOR
MARVIN J. GROSSMAN Address: University of South Florida Title: Assistant Pro
fessor Age: 32 Degrees: B.A. and M.Ed., University of Miami; Ed.D., University
of Georgia Specialization: Experimental research on skills, attitudes and psychologi
cal or physiological orientations related to art education.
427