Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Designing a suitable channel system will require defining the customer needs, clarifying the channel
objectives, looking at alternative systems which can meet this objectives, cost of the channel and finally
evaluating the various alternatives to hone in on the ideal channel system. The channel System has to be a
combination of the revenue generation or the commercial part and the physical delivery of the goods and
services or the logistics / supply chain part.
The channel design has to pay attention to all links in reaching the product from the manufacturer to
end user.
Segmentation Stage
It is the clusters of customers on the basis of what each segment expects out of the Channel.
Positioning Stage
It defines channel element which is required to service each of the segment.
Focus Stage
The sales manager decides only the segments that need to be addressed.
Developing the Right Channel Alternative
At this stage the sales manager could work out the best possible alternatives.
Channel Alternatives
A company looks at alternatives for its distribution channel after it has decided on the targeted customers and
the customer service deliverables it desires from it channel partners to reach these customers. At the time of
deciding on the alternatives, the company will scan for:
Business intermediaries currently available in the market.
The number and type of intermediaries required.
Any new channel members that need to be specially developed.
Roles of each of the Channel Members.
Current Intermediaries
As business activity has grown over the years, a number of intermediaries or ready channel partners are
already in operation and can be utilized.
Some of this intermediaries are:
o Distributors or Redistribution Stockists they could already be working for some companies but
would welcome business from new firms not directly in competition with their existing company
portfolios.
o Carrying and Forwarding Agents they provide services of breaking bulk, warehousing and
transport.
o Logistics Service Providers they will be willing to undertake all the distribution activities once the
goods or finished products are handed over to them at the factory gate.
o Manufacturers Agents, Stokists, and Guarantors these are the businessmen who provide the
financial support to sell goods in the market place.
o Financing Agencies could be banks or similar institutions who finance the channel partners and
even the customers.
Specifically Contracted such as, they are NOT EXCLUSIVE TO A COMPANY:
o Wholesalers, Semi-wholesalers these are the traders who are based in the market place and buy and
sell a variety of goods either to consumers or retailers.
o Retailers the least denomination traders in the market place. They are not exclusive to any company.
o Service Centres are meant for servicing any equipment or consumer durable.
Number of Intermediaries
Even after the company is clear on the distribution channels it wants to operate, it has to finalise the
numbers of each category of intermediary. The numbers should be adequate for expected coverage of the
targets markets but at the same time should not be too much to dilute the effort and add to the costs.
Hybrid Channels
Company which use multiple channels are those with a hybrid channel structure.
Hybrid means that some parts of the channel are managed by the company itself and some others are
handle by intermediaries.
Evaluation of Major Alternatives
It is necessary to decide on the criteria before evaluating the alternatives.
Cost of Operations
Adaptability
Vertical Integration - strategy where a company expands its business operations into
different steps on the same production path, such as when a manufacturer owns its supplier
and/or distributor.
Types of Integration:
Upstream Integration - The channel member would be for him to make the products,
brand them and sell them.
Own the Channel or Outsource? - If the firm decides to own its marketing channels it will
influence its distribution and also its manufacturing practices.
Some of issues regarding the Vertical Integration:
2. The number of people to be managed would be quite large for a national firm.
3. Vertical Integration provides the control over the distribution function but may not give
the expectes benefits.
1. The company product and the brands are highly technology driven and need highly
trained and skilld manpower to explain and sell (Ex. Medical diagnostic equipment)
2. The competition being faced is low and market shares are high and it cost effective to
use own distribution networks.
4. It is not easy to forecast sales accurately and hence revenue commitments cannot be
made to channel partners.
7. The company is not able to get good and reliable channel partners.
A 3P marketing channel has a certain inherent advantages compared to the company doing
the operations on their own. These advantages are:
1. Core competence
2. Motivation
3. Flexibility in operations
4. His operations are smaller and hence better managed and controlled
5. Local Strengths
6. Independent Operations
7. Threat Replacement
1. Door to door
2. Vending Machines
3. Tele-shopping networks
4. Catalogues
6. Electronic Channels
2. May still take less time than going to a store and buying
6. Consumers not sure if they are getting a good bargain in terms of pricing
Other applications of the use of Internet are:
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) - use of the internet by a company and its suppliers
to exchange information and data.
Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) - the system of suppliers keeping inventory on behalf
of their customers and supplying regular quantities as per an agreed schedule.
The process of recruitment could include placing advertisement in the press or getting the salespeople to visit
the markets and speak to the promising candidates. At times, existing channel partners also give good
references of prospective candidates in other towns. Poaching from competition is not considered an ethical
practice.
Given below are two examples from the consumer products industry on the partners which are examined
before appointing channel members a C&FA and a distributor.
The primary requirement of a C&FA should be that he is a transporter with good warehousing facilities. The
C&FA is normally selected to operate in territories or a state in which he is located.
The responsibilities of C&FA include: receipts of goods, storage and care, order receipt from salespeople,
order processing, dispatch with correct documentation, record keeping, sales and stock reporters, collection
of sales process from distributors and managing secondary transport for dispatches.
Example: A Distributor
A distributor also known as a redistribution stockist, just does that. He buys the company products from the
company C&FA and re-distributes (sells) it to all the wholesalers, retailers and institutions from where the
final consumer or end but it or where it may get consumed (in an institution). The distributor invests in the
product and ensures that it reaches closest to the point where in the end user buys the product and hence has
got a major responsibility within the distribution network. He is, therefore, selected based n a larger number
of parameters as can be seen here:
For companies like FMCG and pharmaceuticals only some of the channel partners like C&FAs and
distribution can be recruited. The other channel members like wholesalers, retailers, and chemists already
exist in the market and automatically become part of the network. There is no effort required in selecting
these channels members. The effort is only in persuading them to stock and sell the company products.
If the same search for a dealer is being made by an automobile maker, he would look for these additional
qualifications in the prospective dealer:
If a company were looking at building a distribution network to penetrate rural markets with agricultural
inputs like fertilizers, seeds and insecticides they would prefer to look at wholesalers in feeder markets where
most farmers would be coming for their purchases. The major requirement of such distributors would be to
finance the farmers for the inputs and wait patiently till the harvest to realize their payments.
For each category of product or service one can think of, the characteristic required of all the channel
members can be clearly listed down.
The three most important factors influencing channel selection are: (a) nature of the product or service and
the relevant markets, (b) the company characteristics and (c) the kind of channel partners who are likely to be
available.
The product customer combination influences channel selection to a large extent. For example, selling
shampoo in urban markets compared to selling fertilizers to farmers. Some of these are the follows:
The Control Process, the manager is responsible to monitor his subordinates for him to become an effective
manager. Most of the definitions of control include the steps or elements of the control process.
In exercising the control function, a manager measures the performance of an individual, plans, or programs
against their predetermined standards and take corrective actions if there any deviations. Thus, controls
involves: Determine performance standards, this is the basic foundation were in Establishing standards, you
as a manager focus on what you hope to achieve, youll focus on profits or share of the market. And after you
establish standards you as a manager will monitor the performance of an employees.
In comparison of actual performance, this phase of control process involves checking to determine whether
the actual performance meets the predetermined or planned performance. Next is taking corrective action
when and where deviations from the standards occur, when your actual performance doesnt meet your plan,
you must do specific action to correct it. And we have already examined two types of controls which
specifically apply to corrective action of the control process.
Some innovative people and organizations have already built-in corrective actions in their control process, if
the deviations are due to controllable factors. Some even go the extent of identifying the uncontrollable
factors and developing alternative actions for deviations. And last steps, Follow-through we cant correct
them by just recommending corrective action but we can help them by demonstrating what they need to do.
5 Characteristics of Services
*THEY ARE INTANGIBLE - cannot be easily distinguished like visible features, styles or performance
characteristic.
*THEY ARE INSEPARABLE FROM THEIR SERVICE PROVIDERS -not possible to delegate the delivery
to a third party. The services are tied to the provider of the service.
*THEY CANNOT BE STANDARDIZED -they have to be custom-made & delivered. Services are people
intensive and can vary with the people providing them. They can also vary with the same person over time
*CUSTOMERS ARE INVOLVED IN SERVICE TO A GREAT DEGREE -they are required to defines the
extent of the services provided to them
*THEY ARE PERISHABLE -they are cannot be stored for delivery at a future date.
Location of the service provider is also important for accessibility and convenience use of technological
innovations.
3. Agent and Brokers - do not take possession of the merchandise and yet provide services for a fee
Some of these issues are not serious and can be routine, and get tackled routinely. There may only be a
time delay. It would be necessary to rank the issues in terms of their importance to the relationship and
the achievement of the joint goals. The ranking can be form very important to trivial.
All issues are not like to arise at the same time or even with same frequency. Apart from listing the issues
and prioritizing then in order of importance, is it also necessary to check how frequently these issues have
surfaced in the review period and what the views of both parties on the issues are. If coverage by a
distributor is in important issue and it has been brought to the notice of the distributor b the sales people
four times in the last 6months, It is a major and urgent issue.
The next step would be assess the perception of each party on the issue and how strongly each feels about
what is being expected from him about the issue. Here we are trying to assess the seriousness of the
conflict to decide the kind of solution which is likely to work. In the example given above, if the
distributor feels that this coverage of the market is adequate but the company feels otherwise, there is a
mismatch that needs to be addressed.
The last step in an inventory of all the issues ranked in importance, frequency occurence and the views of
the parties concerned on what really seems to be the problem.
This final list is to enable developing a way out of the situation giving more importance to the serious issues which
may become manifest conflicts if not resolved now.
Tracing the source of the conflict
Some of the causes of conflict could be broadly identified as:
The objectives set by the channel members for themselves may not match the overall requirements of the
channel system- clash of goals .
Channel members may read the business/ Market situation differently.
The channel members understanding of their domain areas where they feel they have the independence of
operations.
The some of the methods used to find out if conflicts exist include:
Checking with channel members at regular intervals about what they think of each others performance.
What in their opinion are some of the irritants of the system? How successfully have this been tackled in
the past?
Salespeople continuously assess the performance of the channel members and can sense latent conflicts.
They also keep making efforts to resolve these early.
Clash of goals Clash of goals or goal divergence seems to be the most common. For example, the
distributor may feel that he has done a good job if he has covered all the potential outlets in his territory and
sold fast moving products to them. This goal is at variance with the channel principal (The company) who
feels that he has to cover all outlets (not just potential ones) and sell all products at each outlet (not just fast
moving goods) the objective of the distributor here may be to maximize his profitability whereas the
objective of the principal is 100 percent coverage and distribution.
DIFFERENT PERCEPTION Apart from the clash on goals there is also the situation of the perception of
aspects of doing business starting with the targets. The perception could vary between the channel members
about their role in the channel system, product features, the customers and competition. This could be
because of the relative difference in attention they pa to the aspects of the business. The distributor would
look at the customer more closely and may not have a clear idea of the way the products have been
developed. His perception is from the selling to the customers angle and the manufacture, while wanting the
attention to customers, would also focus on the products he has so carefully developed. The manufacturer is
very clear on what he expects the product to do. A good process of constant communication between the
channel partners can help handle the situation better.
UNCLEAR DOMAIN The third area of discord mentioned earlier was the definition of the domain as
perceived by each channel principal and his channel members. Some members may feel that some others are
not pulling their weight in the achievement of the channel objectives. In industrial products, after-sales
service support becomes one such bone of contention. Some of the company dealers believe that servicing of
the equipment is the responsibility of the company and the dealer only has to sell the product to the customer
and train him how to use it. The company may think that the dealer is also required to service the products
post-sale and the dealer has to develop the infrastructure and the expertise for this. It is also the fact that in
order to overcome the possible domain conflict on such an important issue, the company sets up a parallel
chain of authorized service centres. Even if the dealer agrees to take the responsibility for the servicing
domain, there could still be the discord on how much spares the dealer has to carry or whether he should
carry them it all.
MARKET DOMAIN CONFLICTS The conflict regarding who should cover that markets is the most
frequent among channel members and keeps getting resolved and surfacing regularly. The conflict could be
between
SIMILAR CHANNEL MEMBER This conflict arise between channel members with similar roles and
responsibilities. This is also known as horizontal channel conflict. For example, let us look up at a company
which is operating a set of five distributors in a city each of whom has been given some terrorizes to cover
the usual money in the territory visits a distributor in another territory and buys the good. The problem gets
compounded if his non-designated distributor give some kind of discount on the sales.
CHANNEL PRINCIPAL AND HIS CHANNEL MEMBER Again, this is a common occurrence. The
company salespeople, who meet a major key prospect in the territory of the distributor, would promise some
additional benefits to gets business from the prospect and convert him into a key account. This benefit would
normally not be available for the distributor has to supply the products on these credit terms. This problem
can also arise with multiple channels in the same market-like distributors for retail selling and company
salespeople for institutional business.
The other serious area of discord happens when a company introduces a new distributor in a territory
which already has a few distributors. The existing distributors feel capable of covering all markets and
institutions, but the company feels that they need an additional distributor to take care of the additional
potential. The concern gets worse if the new distributor territory is carved out with new areas and some cuts
in the areas of existing distributors.
The third area of conflict arises if the company has a different set of distributors for different sets of
products and all of them call on the same wholesalers and retailers to sell their products. Each distributor
would like to maximize the sales for this products. The retailer has limited funds from which he has ti buy all
the company products. If the distributor visiting him first takes away a major chunk of the funds, the sales of
other products of the same company also brought b another distributor of the same company, may suffer.
Conversely, if the retailer has a problem with a distributor of one set of products, he may not co-operate with
other distributors of the company also (for no fault of theirs). The company uses these multiple channels to
increase the coverage and market share.
CHANNEL MEMBERS AT DIFFERENT LEVELS Here, the channel members are working for the same
products in the same territory. In their eagerness to get business, some of them may act in a manner that hurts
the other channel member. The common example is that of wholesalers who buy large quantities on discounts
and then sell the same products undercutting the company prices. The distributor who has sold the large
quantity to a wholesaler in his territory finds that in the next week, the wholesaler is re-selling the goods to
the retailers in the same territory at a price at which the distributor cannot sell. Unscrupulous salespeople at
times encourage such a practice to achieve their targets in one period. This is also known as vertical channel
conflict.
The most common problem between distributors and C&FA relates to the products the C&FA
dispatches to the distributor. At times, the C&FA does not have a particular product indented by a distributor,
and in order to ensure a full truck load dispatch, after checking with the salespeople, the C&FA loads the
additional quantities if a product the distributor did not even order. The C&FA immediately deposits the
distributors cheque into the company account. This becomes a major issue.
CHANNEL MEMBERS OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM - This problem can also arise with channel members at
different levels as explained above. At times, the distributor has a major wholesaler in his territory who may
not be buying from him (it could be that the wholesaler was also a prospective distributor, but did not get
selected and has decided not to buy from the official distributor.) Such a wholesaler may buy from another
major territory nearby and se at discounted prices in the territory of the designated distributor. If the
wholesaler buys from a cash-and-carry outlet like Metro, he can still create problems on retail distribution. In
pharmaceutical distribution your heart about discounted goods from major hospital chemist shops getting
into the market at lower prices than permitted.
The grey market used to be a major source of imported electronic goods in India till some years back.
These outlets used to eat into the genuine sales of good electronic brands produced in the country. With
liberalization, this problem has almost vanished.
It is a known fact that as long as a set of diverse business people operate in a channel system, there is bound
to be some conflict. Like it was mentioned earlier, it is acceptable to have such conflicts. It is also a known
fact early stages of latent and perceived conflicts and do not escalate into manifest conflicts. It is also a
known fact that when a conflict has escalated into a dispute, which has got resolved amicably, there is always
an element of distrust which is built into the system. It is never known when his shimmering discontent and
mis-trust of fellow channel members may ignite into another problem. It is, therefore, ideal to identify the
conflicts at be earlier two stages and resolve them.
One of the ways channel members use to control each other is to use the power of coercion. Coercion is
nothing but a channel principal for example, telling his channel partner--- you better do what I say or
otherwise. The first reaction from the target is always one of retaliation. Retaliation gets auctioned
depending on the independence of the target.
Anyway, like it was mentioned earlier, coercion as a power tool has to be used only in exceptions as it
is not best for developing channel relationships. Channel systems work well with good relationships between
the members in the long run. The power of coercion can be used effectively only when the channel partner
using this power on another is himself doing and excellent job of what is expected of him and is a role
model.
CONFLICTS RESOLUTION
The business has to go on successfully. If conflicts happen, they have to be accepted and resolved so that the
channel continues to deliver superior customer service. There are several was companies have developed,
with experience, to resolve channel conflicts.
Conflicts solution can be standardized in environments where the principal is operating with channel
members on contract to ensure fairness and equity. In instances where the conflict arises between channel
partners who are not bound by contracts or agreements of any kind, the conflict resolution is guided b best
past practice. Some of the channel conflicts resolution methods are described below:
Examples included joint membership of trade associations, distributor councils, personnel exchange
between channel partners and if none of this work, going to a third party mediator or arbitrator. Let us see if
some of these methods work in the Indian context:
Joint membership of trade associations could exist in engineering kind of industries where a principal
and his channel partners may both be members of a chamber of commerce, but this may not be the
right medium to help them resolve their conflicts.
Distributor councils sound more like distributor unions in the Indian context and companies may
never encourage this. We have seen the example of distributor associations in Kerala boycotting the
sales of many FMCG company products to bargain for better margins obviously this kind of
association is used as a medium of coercive power.
Personnel exchange between channel partners can and does happen in the IT hardware, engineering,
automobile industries where company personnel work with the distributors to develop selling skills
and servicing capabilities. The distributors personnel may also get trained on the shop floor of the
principals.
Mediation can also be done through trade associations.
The final stage of arbitration has legal connotation and is the last resort.
All of the above solutions can work in situations where there are contracted channel partners and not with
agents or even retailers, the problem has to be solved on a case to case basis by a dialogue between the
parties to the discord.
SOME OF THE OTHER METHODS USED FOR RESOLUTION OF CHANNEL CONFLICTS ARE:
Sharing of information between channel partners can avoid conflicts. The risk is that normally
confidential information may have to be shared.
Exchanging personnel between channel partners.
Working together for sharing of responsibilitythe two channel members establish a separate
channel between them to route information, support and any other request to be made on each other.
It is like a permanent third party mediator on the premises.
Use of third parties for mediation or arbitrationonly when the situation has gone out of control of
the channel members involved.
Clear rules of conduct to help build good relationships. The norms for behaviour get established over
a period of time. Following these rules by both parties helps prevent conflicts.
Use of incentives and rewards the most popular of all the conflict resolution methods is to offer
financial or economic incentives. To make it a more negotiated settlement, the payments can be
agreed to be paid on a certain performance agreed as part of the conflict resolution.
Joint goal setting by the channel principal and its channel members for joint problem solving. This
happens all the time under the supervision if the salespeople managing the channel.
Direct interaction between channel members for joint problem solving. This happens all the time
under the supervision of the salespeople managing the channel.
Avoidance
Aggression
Accommodation
Compromise
Collaboration
Least of efforts and results Maximum efforts and best results
As long as companies do business with channel partners who are anyway outsiders, and not part of the company,
channel conflicts keep happening. It may not be possible to ever create a situation of no conflict at all. It should,
however, be possible to resolve conflicts so that relationships between channel partners develop for their mutual
benefit. Some of the ways of managing conflict are:
At the times of adversity of difficulty which the firm and its channel partners are facing (like a dominant
competitor who is suddenly very active), they tend to unite together with a common purpose and goal of defeating
the adversary and retaining market shares. This collective goals setting could be a good way of managing conflict
even in normal circumstances. The target of goals can be planned and agreed mutually with a clear reasoning why
they need to be achieved.
Participation in the planning process is sometimes extended formally to the channel partners. They then feel that
they have been a partner in the decision and are more likely to abide by it. For example, When a new product/
brand or pack is launched, the distributors are invited for a launch meeting to tell them more about the lunch and its
objective. During this meeting their views are sought and together with them, spot targets are set for each of them to
achieve in the first few months of the launch.
A number of companies make their management trainees to work in the business of the channel partner as part
of training process. This creates a confidence in the channel members and also gives an opportunity for the
company to understand how the channel partner operates. For example, a management trainee in an automobile
company may work in the dealer showroom and service centre as part of his training.
If the conflict does not get resolved easily, the company will then have to resort to: (a) Diplomacy or relationships,
(b) mediation by a third party, and (c) arbitration. The last resort to resolve a dispute (conflict has now escalated
into a dispute) is of course a legal recourse.
Law always safeguards the interests of the weaker partner in any dispute. The company dealers and distributors
have protection under the law. While the company and its channel partners may want go the legal way only as a last
resort, it is necessary to know some of the legal issues and what they suggest by way of conflict resolution:
Use of exclusive dealers by companies is not permitted. The company cannot bind the distributor from
doing any business of his choice.
Similarly, the company cannot formally designate the territory to be covered by a contracted channel
member. This protects both the company (who can appoint more dealers in the same area) and the channel
member who can sell beyond his designated territory.
Full-line forcing is not legally permitted. The company cannot force the dealer or a retailer that if he wants a
popular product, he has to also buy a slow moving product.
Termination of contract distributors for poor performance is not easy even when it is mention in the
contract/agreement. The cause has to be clearly established. None-performance cannot be easily prove if the
dealer challenge the target and the target setting process itself.
CHANNEL CONTROL
A word about control of the channels is to be discussed here. Some of the methods used to control
channel members are:
In an administered VMS:
The channel members plan the distribution talks together through the use of
partnerships and alliances.
The manufacturer or Channel principal has a major influence on the rest of the
channel members.
The channel relationships are also formalized in contracts if necessary.
Maximum control on the channel system is possible through a corporate VMS as the company
operates organizations in the distribution system. The implications for the channel here are:
High level of control possible on the entire channel.
Entry into desired markets is easier as the channel belongs to the firm.
Control over how the product is sold at different levels.
Protection of company and product reputations.
The disadvantage of a corporate VMS are in requiring large number of employees to manage the system and
the higher levels of inventories require.
Some of the aspects of channel management covered here, have already been highlighted in chapter 12 under
distributor management. Some of these policies have been discussed here in the context of the entire
marketing channels not just contracted channel partners. The major aspects of channel policies related to:
which market to serve, the customer coverage within this markets, pricing, product line to be handled,
selection of the right channel, termination of the channel membership and ownership of the channel.
Markets to be served
Sales policy of any company whether selling FMCG, industrial products or services dictates that all markets
with potential for doing business need to be served. Resource limitations prevent the same level or servicing
for all markets. The sales manager priorities his markets and devotes maximum channel power in the most
potential markets.
For industrial products, the customers are normally located in cluster and it is easier to decide the market
coverage for the dealers. In the case of consumer products and pharmaceutical products the markets are
spread widely including a vast rural market. For this kind of products the frequency of market coverage is
decided based on the importance or potential of the market and the prevalent competition. In either case,
what competition does, decides the kind of markets coverage most of the times. The market coverage plan is
reflected in the bit plan of the channel partner.
Companies make sure that there is no overlap of markets between their contracted channel members like
distributors, stockist, dealers or agents (As otherwise, this could be the primary reason for channel conflict).
Independent wholesalers and retailers normally service the market in which they are located. Except for
institutions in the market they service, their entire sales happens from their own outlets- their customers
come them for purchases.
Customer coverage
This is the second part of the beat plan. After deciding the list of markets to be serviced, it is necessary to
decide the customers (wholesalers, retailers and institution-those who buy the products for their own
consumption and not for resale) who need calling upon and the frequency of callage. Even here, based on
experience, the customers can be classified as A, B and C categories with service levels accordingly.
Basic rules on customer coverage include:
Every customer has to be visited at least once a month.
Every call on a customer has to be made productive.
A customer cannot be visited by two distributors for the same products.
The owner of the distributor firm has to also visit the key customers personally apart
from the visit by his salesmen.
For independent wholesalers and retailers there is no limitation on their customers.
Every person who walks into their outlet is a customer.
PRICING
This is probably the most critical issue when dealing with channel partner whether they are on contract or
independent. Like all business men, they want prices which are favourable to give them the highest margin,
there is, however, a limit to the margins which can be provided as every such margin effects the end price
for the product to be paid by the consumer. Most of the times, what competition does decides the prices that
can operate in the market.
PRODUCT LINES
The channel members in the market, who are independent wholesalers and retailers decided on their own as
to which product lines they want to promote. However, for contracted channel members like distributors and
C&FAs, there is an unwritten rule that they will not work with competitive products once they have signed
with a company for its products.
If the company has different categories of products like HUL- beverage and food products, soups, detergents
and personal products and ice creams, they would prefer to have different channel partners for each set of
products. At times, it is not feasible to handle some of these products together- for example, A detergent
product and branded wheat flour. Some products like ice creams need special cold storage and leading
facilities and hence need a different channel.
Complimentary product lines through the same channel.
All similar customers serviced through the same type of channel. In
pharmaceutical for example different channels may be used to cover
doctors, hospital and chemists.