You are on page 1of 32

Mohan A.

Harihar - Complainant
7124 Avalon Drive, Acton, MA 01720 | 617.921.2526 (Mobile) | mo.harihar@gmail.com

COPY PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP


April 17, 2017

Ms. Anastasia Dubrovsky


Administrative Attorney
United States Courts For The First Circuit
1 Courthouse Way Suite 3700
Boston, MA 02210

RE: 2nd Supplement to Petition under Review of Judicial


Misconduct Complaint No. 01-16-90033

Dear Ms. Dubrovsky:


Per our recent phone conversation, it has become necessary to file a
second (2nd) Supplement to the Judicial Misconduct Petition against
US District Court Judge Allison Dale Burroughs. Two (2) evidenced,
incremental acts of felony/criminal misconduct are now alleged
against Judge Burroughs:

1. Treason to the Constitution, pursuant to Article III This

Fifth (5th) allegation of Treason stems (at minimum) from the

conscious decision to issue an order, DISMISSING the

Plaintiffs complaint, WITHOUT JURISDICTION. With this VOID

order associated with Document No. 139, it is interpreted

that Judge Burroughs has purposefully committed a fifth (5th)

act of Treason to the Constitution.

2. Intellectual Property Rights Infringement and Economic

Espionage, Pursuant to 18 U.S. Code 1832 - Based on the

extensive pattern of corrupt conduct, including the


misappropriation of the Plaintiffs trade secret(s), the

Plaintiff brings allegations of Economic Espionage against

Judge Allison D. Burroughs.

See Attachment A, Document No. 141, to review the Plaintiff/

Complainants filed RESPONSE to the VOID order associated with

Document No. 139, and further articulation of these evidenced

allegations.

See Attachment B, Document No. 142, NOTICE of APPEAL - While it

ultimately may be considered unnecessary to file a NOTICE OF APPEAL,

it has yet to be determined if Judicial Misconduct extends beyond

the US District Court. Already, there is concern surrounding the

initial opinion issued by Chief Justice Howard, which has yet to be

corrected. The Plaintiff respectfully states that any failure to

take corrective action in this matter shows cause to bring

additional judicial misconduct claims, and adds (at minimum) to

already existing Conspiracy claims filed against the United States.

Due to the severity of these evidenced criminal allegations, and out

of fear for personal safety, the Complainant has additionally copied

the following Offices/Agencies for their information:

A. The Executive Office of the President Notified via email, US

Mail and social media (See Attachment C);

Page 2
B. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Washington/Boston

offices notified via email and social media;

C. The Office of the US Attorney General Notified via email, US

Mail and social media;

D. The House Judiciary Committee Notified via US Mail and social

media;

E. Massachusetts Governor Charles Baker (R-MA) Notified via

email, US Mail and social media.

F. The Office of the US Inspector General, Michael Horowitz -

Notified via email, US Mail and social media.

PLEASE NOTE: By informing the Offices/Agencies listed above, ALL

THREE branches of the United States government are officially

notified of evidenced allegations including (but not limited to)

TREASON and ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE. These evidenced allegations ADD to

the existing Plaintiff claims against the United States, and the

UNDENIABLE need for assistance with the appointment of counsel, as

requested.1

At this time, the Plaintiff states for the record his intentions,

and with the assistance of Federal Prosecutors, to have criminal

1 Reference Document No.s 124 and 126, and Existing claims against
the United States which have yet to be addressed including (but not
limited to): Violations to Due process, Color of Law Violations,
ABUSE of PROCESS CLAIMS, and FEDERAL TORT claims. The evidenced
Treason and Economic Espionage allegations now show cause to expand
claims to include Conspiracy and RICO claims against the United
States.
Page 3
charges brought against Judge Allison Dale Burroughs. The continued

PATTERN OF CORRUPT CONDUCT and the evidenced ACTS of BAD FAITH

identified throughout the record demonstrates the Judges CLEAR

INTENT to cause irreparable harm and damages to this Plaintiff, and

ultimately to the United States. The clear ABUSE of JUSTICE is so

extensive, MENTAL ILLNESS should not be ruled out. While these

criminal acts are clear and irrefutable, further investigation is

needed to determine if Judge Burroughs has acted alone, or has

COLLUDED with other parties. The Complainant re-states the

considerable concern(s) indicating that misconduct extends BEYOND

the US District Court; citing the documented (and still uncorrected)

OPINION of Chief Justice Howard, of the First Circuit.

The Actions evidenced by Judge Allison Dale Burroughs against this

Plaintiff CANNOT be allowed to continue without legal consequence(s).

Doing so would at minimum - irreparably harm the Plaintiff, wrongfully

impact precedent, and will deprive the Nation from substantial economic

benefit. Furthermore, the Nation and ALL Americans will be witness to

a level of CORRUPTION of historic proportion. Immediate action by the

Judicial Council is clearly warranted, including Congressional

intervention (if necessary) to remove and replace Judge Burroughs for

the evidenced allegations stated within this petition.

The Complainant is grateful for the Judicial Councils time and


consideration of this very serious matter.

Page 4
Respectfully Submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
Complainant/Plaintiff

Page 5
Attachment A

Page 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

MOHAN A. HARIHAR CIVIL ACTION NO: 15-cv-11880

Plaintiff

vs.

US BANK NA, et al.

Defendants

RESPONSE TO DOCUMENT NO. 139, INCLUDING NEW ALLEGATIONS OF TREASON,

ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE AND MISPRISION

The Plaintiff, Mohan A. Harihar, acting pro se, respectfully files

this RESPONSE to the judicial order of DISMISSAL, Document No. 139,

issued WITHOUT JURISDICTION on April 3, 2017 by Judge Allison D.

Burroughs. This order is considered VOID, as is ALL related orders

issued by Judge Burroughs.

The Plaintiff respectfully informs the Court of the following:

1. Treason to the Constitution, pursuant to Article III - is now

evidenced for a fifth (5th) time.

2. Misprision of Treason, pursuant to 18 USC 23822 - is alleged

(5 counts) against the eleven (11) attorneys representing the

218 USC 2382 - Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and
having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them,
Page 7
Defendants, also against Defendant Martha Coakley, Esq. and

Defendant - Jeffrey S. Patterson, Esq.

3. Misprision of Felony, pursuant to 18 USC 43 - is alleged

against ALL Defendants and their respective attorneys.

With regard to MISPRISION, any effort by the Defendants to seek

protection under the fifth (5th) Amendment or Sovereign Immunity

is considered waived, as evidenced FRAUD on the Court

violations (alleged) under FRCP 60(b)(3) against ALL Defendants

is on record.

4. Economic Espionage, pursuant to 18 U.S. Code 1832 are

alleged against Judge Burroughs, ALL Defendants and their

attorneys.

These NEW allegations warrant the amendment of the existing

complaint, and (at minimum) collectively adds to the supported CIVIL

CONSPIRACY, CIVIL RICO and ABUSE of PROCESS CLAIMS made by the

conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known
the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or
to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State,
is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
318 USC 4 - Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a

felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does


not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other
person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years,
or both
Page 8
Plaintiff.4 It also shows the UNDENIABLE need for the Court to

finally assist the Plaintiff with the APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.

Due to the severity of these evidenced allegations, it is necessary

to immediately update the following Offices/Agencies/ Courts:

G. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Washington/Boston

offices notified via email and social media;

H. The Office of the US Attorney General Notified via email, US

Mail and social media;

I. The Executive Office of the President Notified via email, US

Mail and social media;

J. The Judicial Council of the First Circuit (Second Supplement to

Judicial Misconduct Petition filed) Notified via US Mail;

K. The House Judiciary Committee Notified via US Mail and social

media;

L. Massachusetts Governor Charles Baker (R-MA) Notified via

email, US Mail and social media.

At this time, the Plaintiff states for the record his intentions,

and with the assistance of Federal Prosecutors, to have criminal

charges brought against Judge Allison Dale Burroughs. The continued

PATTERN OF CORRUPT CONDUCT and the evidenced ACTS of BAD FAITH

identified throughout the record demonstrates the Judges CLEAR

4 Reference Document No. 106, Motion to file Third Amended Complaint,


denied by Judge Burroughs.
Page 9
INTENT to cause irreparable harm and damages to this Plaintiff, and

ultimately to the United States. The clear ABUSE of JUSTICE is so

extensive, MENTAL ILLNESS should not be ruled out. While these

criminal acts are clear and irrefutable, further investigation is

needed to determine if Judge Burroughs has acted alone, or has

COLLUDED with other parties. Already, there is considerable concern

that misconduct extends BEYOND the US District Court, citing the

documented (and still uncorrected) OPINION of Chief Justice Howard,

of the First Circuit.5

The Court is respectfully reminded that that a Judicial Misconduct

Petition, filed against Judge Burroughs is still pending before

Judicial Council of the First Circuit. A second supplement is now

necessarily filed to inform the Judicial Council of these new

evidenced allegations. ANY failure to hold Judge Burroughs

ACCOUNTABLE for her actions BY EITHER THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL AND/OR

FEDERAL PROSECUTORS will suggest to the American Public that she is

ABOVE the LAW, and that the Constitutional rights of this Plaintiff,

an American-born citizen should be IGNORED. It would additionally

CONFIRM that Judicial misconduct EXTENDS BEYOND the District Court

to the First Circuit, warranting further legal action.

5 Reference Attachment A of The Judicial Misconduct Petition


associated w Harihar vs US Bank. The petition can be viewed in its
entirety by clicking on the attached link,
http://scribd.com/document/338338675
Page 10
The Court is respectfully reminded that despite numerous

opportunities - dating back to August 2016, Judge Burroughs HAS YET

TO ADDRESS, DENY or DEFEND these serious allegations brought against

her.

The Plaintiff respectfully calls for the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of

Government/DOJ to immediately initiate the following actions:

1. The OPENING of an official CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION against Judge

Allison Dale Burroughs;

2. The ASSEMBLY of a Grand Jury;

3. The ASSIGNMENT of a Special Prosecutor by the Department of

Justice (DOJ).

Under the PRIOR OBAMA administration, the DOJ, under the (former) US

Attorney General Loretta Lynch is on record as stating they WILL

NOT PROSECUTE evidenced criminal misconduct committed against the

Plaintiff Mohan A. Harihar. It is my HOPE, that under the new

TRUMP administration and US Attorney General Jeff Sessions,

efforts to DRAIN THE SWAMP and take CORRECTIVE ACTION here will

begin.

ADDITIONAL ISSUES PRESENTED

The Plaintiff respectfully brings the following list of ADDITIONAL

ISSUES now before the Court:

Page 11
I. JURISDICTION for the many reasons stated here and throughout

the record, it is necessary for the Court to VALIDATE that Judge

Allison D. Burroughs no longer has jurisdiction to rule in this

litigation.

II. The Denied THIRD Amended Complaint of the Plaintiff EVEN IF

Judge Burroughs had jurisdiction, her decision to DENY a Third

Amended Complaint is viewed as a deliberate effort to damage

the legal efforts of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff references

Document No. 106, filed June 10, 2016, which articulates the

securitization failure of RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED

SECUTITIES (RMBS), and the collective reasons warranting a

third amended complaint.

III. Intellectual Property Rights Infringement and Economic

Espionage, Pursuant to 18 U.S. Code 18326 - Based on the

extensive pattern of corrupt conduct, the Plaintiff brings

allegations of Economic Espionage against Judge Allison D.

Burroughs and also against ALL Defendants.

The misappropriation of trade secrets can impose severe

economic and other harm not only to the owner of the trade

6 Also referencing 18 U.S.C. 1836(b) is replaced to provide for


private civil actions, including (subject to appropriate safeguards)
ex parte orders "providing for the seizure of property necessary to
prevent the propagation or dissemination of the trade secret that is
the subject of the action." Remedies available to the court include
the granting of injunctions, awarding of damages (including treble
damages in cases of willful and malicious misappropriation) and the
awarding of costs in cases where the claim was made in bad faith.
Page 12
secret but on many others. The adverse consequences may affect

company employees whose livelihood is based on the continued

success of the company, a community dependent on the company

contributions to the local economy, or even the health of a

particular industry or the national economy.

In appropriate cases involving aggravated conduct, criminal

prosecution is necessary to deter and punish the

misappropriation of a trade secret.

18 U.S. Code 1832, involves the misappropriation of a trade

secret with the intent to convert the trade secret to the

economic benefit of anyone other than the owner and to injure

the owner of the trade secret. According to the U.S. Attorneys

Manual, some of the factors assessed in initiating an economic

espionage or trade secret case include (a) the scope of the

criminal activity, including evidence of involvement by a

foreign government, foreign agent, or foreign instrumentality;

(b) the degree of economic injury to the trade secret owner;

(c) the type of trade secret misappropriated; (d) the

effectiveness of available civil remedies; and (e) the

potential deterrent value of the prosecution.

The Economic Espionage Act applies to a broad range of

misappropriation conduct. As a general summary,

misappropriation is alleged to exist here (at minimum) under

two (2) categories/subsections:

Page 13
1. Copy/Share - Without authorization copies, duplicates,

sketches, draws, photographs, downloads, uploads, alters,

destroys, photocopies, replicates, transmits, delivers,

sends, mails, communicates, or conveys.

For example, if there is NO ACCOUNTABILITY for the evidenced

allegations of civil/criminal misconduct related to illegal

foreclosure, the Intellectual property belonging to the

Plaintiff, known as - the HARIHAR FCS Model CANNOT be

implemented, and is critically damaged/destroyed;

2. Conspiracy Evidenced allegations show that All fourteen

(14) defendants (15 parties in total, including the United

States) were aware that clear title did not exist with the

Plaintiffs property and that these parties collectively

participated in a scheme to defraud the Plaintiff of his

HOMESTEAD. The Court is well aware that this is not an

isolated incident. The Plaintiff is able to conservatively

provide 4.2 million other examples of this scheme, as

described by the DOJ, the MA Attorney Generals Office and

Federal Bank Regulators.

Such conduct deprives the Plaintiff first - as a homeowner,

secondly the Plaintiff as the Intellectual Property owner,

and third - our Nation of the corresponding economic and social

benefits.

Page 14
The implementation of the Plaintiffs Intellectual Property is

critical to restoring US economic growth, fostering a more

dynamic US economy, and delivering a more broadly shared

prosperity, particularly to those who have been damaged by the

US Foreclosure Crisis, and who live at the bottom of the

economic pyramid.

The details within this docket reveal a clear INTENT by Judge

Burroughs, as well as the Defendants, to misappropriate and/or

irreparably damage the intellectual property rights belonging

to the Plaintiff. The Court is well aware of the Economic

Model, referred to as the Harihar FCS Model. The FCS Model was

created by the Plaintiff to bring substantial Economic growth

and repair (estimated at $5T or greater) to the United States

from damages caused by the US Foreclosure Crisis. The Court is

aware that the FCS Model has merit, having been reviewed by the

Executive Office of the President (EOP, including former VP Joe

Biden), The House Financial Services Committee (Former Deputy

Chief Counsel, Gail Laster), the AG Offices of Massachusetts

and New Hampshire, Senior Economic Advisor (Bruno Freitas) to

US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and others. The record will

show clear efforts by Judge Burroughs and the Defendants to

steer clear from ANY Intellectual Property Rights discussion,

Page 15
and instead attempt to DISCREDIT the Plaintiff to ensure that

this matter never arrives before a jury trial.

The Conspiracy argument can certainly be made where there MAY

be parties who DO NOT wish to see this multi trillion-dollar

economic plan implemented. There may also be INTENT to deprive

the Plaintiff of his Intellectual Property Rights, or both.

This evidenced allegation(s) further underscores the necessity

of assistance with appointed counsel and the alignment with

Federal Prosecutors. The continued effort by Judge Burroughs to

DENY this assistance, reaffirms the intent to keep this

Plaintiff at a critical disadvantage. The Plaintiff now seeks

to work with the US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the

DOJ, as the investigation(s) moves forward, ultimately bringing

charges of Economic Espionage against ALL responsible parties.

The Plaintiff maintains his position to gain alignment with the

TRUMP administration, so that the United States can ultimately

benefit from the Harihar FCS Model.

IV. Re-capping the List of evidenced Judicial Misconduct


allegations against Judge Burroughs now before the Judicial
Council of the First Circuit;

a. Economic Espionage, Pursuant to 18 U.S. Code 1832

b. ARTICLE III. SECTION 3, TREASON to the Constitution (5

counts) stems (at minimum) from the conscious decision to

issue an order WITHOUT jurisdiction. With the VOID order

associated with Document No. 139, it is interpreted that

Page 16
Judge Burroughs has purposefully committed a fifth (5th) act

of Treason to the Constitution.

The requirement of two (2) witnesses is met as the Defendants

and their respective attorneys have ALL witnessed the five

(5) counts of Treason alleged against Judge Burroughs. As

reported, each allegation stems from each judicial order

issued by Judge Burroughs when there was no longer

jurisdiction to do so, and is considered VOID. The VOID order

is part of the Docket, and is communicated to ALL litigants

at the approximate time of issue. Therefore, there can be no

dispute, that the Plaintiff, the Defendants, and their

respective counsel have ALL witnessed these criminal acts.

In Haupt v. United States, 330 U.S. 631 (1947), the Supreme

Court found that two witnesses are not required to prove

intent, nor are two witnesses required to prove that an overt

act is treasonable. The two witnesses, according to the

decision, are required to prove only that the overt act

occurred (eyewitnesses and federal agents investigating the

crime, for example).

c. Refusal to Assist with the Appointment of Counsel, 28 U.S.C.

1915 This Act made in Bad Faith by Judge Burroughs is

exemplified throughout the Docket, Reference Document No.

138. Judge Burroughs has denied multiple requests to schedule

a hearing to clarify this, and other decisions under oath,

Page 17
and in the presence of a court reporter. The expectation that

ANY pro se litigant should have the ability to successfully

litigate the extensive and complex legal issues alleged in

this Docket - and without the assistance of experienced

counsel is simply ludicrous.

d. Judicial Fraud on the Court exemplified by the conscious

decision of Judge Burroughs to IGNORE a Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure, including (but not limited to) FRCP 60 (b)(3)

Reference Document No. 121, Motion for Recusal. By violating

and ignoring the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of

Evidence, Judge Burroughs has committed - an obstruction(s)

of justice, Act(s) made in Bad Faith, and has shown cause for

RECUSAL;

e. Refusal to Recuse (2 Counts) reference Document No.s 121

thru 126.

f. ACTS made in BAD FAITH Judge Burroughs fails to make a

single reference to, or take responsibility for, ANY act by

the United States made in BAD FAITH.

g. Violations to DUE PROCESS - The decision(s) made by Judge

Burroughs not to disqualify herself, now brings a violation

of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United

States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) ("The

right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not

on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause."). Reference

Document No.s 121 thru 124;

Page 18
h. Ignoring evidenced Claims filed against the United States

as indicated in Document No.s 123-124. Also, reference

Document No. 126. To ensure compliance with Federal Rules,

the Plaintiff has served Notice to all three (3) branches of

the Federal Government via email communication, notifying

them of the intention to amend/include the United States as a

Defendant in the referenced civil complaint. Included with

the Notice is the completed Federal Tort Form 95, as required

for any Federal Tort Claims against the United States.

Despite multiple documented requests by the Plaintiff, the

United States has yet to inform the Plaintiff of their legal

intentions moving forward.

i. Judicial Prejudice/Bias as evidenced and reported

throughout the record;

j. Failure to maintain a Balance of Hardships - and CAUSING

INCREASED HARDSHIP to the Plaintiff, as evidenced and

reported throughout the record;

k. Unnecessary Judicial Delay this civil action, filed nearly

two (2) years ago (May 2015), has certainly evidenced

unnecessary delay by Judge Burroughs. These delays negatively

impact both the Plaintiff as well as Defendants. Examples

include (but are not limited to): the judges failure to

assist with the appointment of council, ten (10) months

Page 19
WITHOUT a move to DISCOVERY, and efforts to issue orders

without jurisdiction;

l. Color of Law violations as evidenced and reported

throughout the record;

m. Denial of Hearings Evidenced in the record, Judge Burroughs

has refused/denied to schedule hearings that were - either

mandated by law, or requested by the Plaintiff for

clarification purposes, and in the presence of a court

reporter.

n. Failing to accept as true all well-pleaded facts -

Analyzing those facts in the light most hospitable to the

plaintiffs theory, and drawing all reasonable inferences

from those facts in favor of the plaintiff. While Judge

Burroughs CLAIMS to have done so, a REVIEW and VALIDATION of

the record will confirm otherwise. This is clear and

irrefutable throughout the Docket, and shows cause to

question WHY A MOVE TO DISCOVERY WAS NEVER INITIATED.

o. Refusing to ADDRESS Plaintiff FEARS for SAFETY and Well-Being

The Plaintiffs fully supported complaint addresses what

many consider (worldwide) to be the largest case of FRAUD in

US History. The complaint calls out - not only the misconduct

within the countrys largest lending institutions, but also

corruption within government. It reveals the MA State

Attorney Generals and DOJs documented refusal (under the

Obama administration), to prosecute evidenced criminal

Page 20
misconduct against an American-born citizen. On top of that,

the Plaintiff is the sole owner to intellectual property

valued at approximately $5T, and his civil complaint impacts

a potential precedent to at least 4.2M parties.

Efforts to address these issues in a Federal Court has

revealed evidenced judicial misconduct of substantial

proportion. The Plaintiff has clear reason to fear for his

personal safety and well-being, and has brought these

concerns to the attention of the Court on several occasions.

The presiding judge has completely IGNORED the Plaintiffs

concerns, as if they were never mentioned.

V. Call for VALIDATION of demonstrated Judicial techniques

The Plaintiff calls for the necessary assistance of

counsel, and of federal prosecutors to validate whether Judge

Burroughs demonstrated Judicial techniques within this docket

that corroborate misconduct allegations. These techniques

include (but are not limited to):

1. Failure to consider the possibility of erred judgments of the


State Court(s);

2. Ignoring the Law - One of the primary techniques used by

corrupt judges is to simply ignore the law. One party cites

the law and overwhelming case law. The favoured party doesn't

have the law on their side. The judge simply ignores the law

and rules against the party that was legally right;

3. Citing Invalid Law - claiming a case applies when it doesn't;

Page 21
4. Ignoring the Facts - Judges are always under oath, and a

judge is supposed to never say or write anything that isn't

true. So, when a judge knowingly lies in orders for the

purpose of ruling against a party for the judge's criminal

reasons, it is a criminal violation of perjury. Each such

instance is a separate count;

5. Ignoring Issues - rather than make up an explanation, a judge

just ignores those tough issues.;

6. Saying Nothing in Orders - corruptly calling a complaint

"frivolous" and denying motions with no valid explanation

whatsoever;

7. Block Filing of Motions and Evidence - The pro se party is

denied the information needed to defeat the other party, and

there is no record of this evidence and these arguments on

appeal;

8. Tampering with Evidence as evidenced in the Middlesex

Superior Court, and ignored;

9. Denying Constitutional Rights as evidenced;

10. Automatically Ruling against PRO SE LITIGANTS as

evidenced;

11. Violating the Judicial Oath of Office and the Code of

Judicial Conduct as evidenced;

12. Allowing Perjury - When the judge knows the testimony is

perjured, the judge is suborning perjury when he or she does

nothing about it and accepts the perjury as if it was fact;

Page 22
13. Premature Dismissal PRIOR to DISCOVERY as evidenced;

14. Denying a Hearing - Hearings are dangerous for dishonest

judges as courtroom observers, media, and the transcript of

the hearing will force the judges to be a little more honest.

15. Denying a Jury Trial - Judges corrupt the judicial process

by depriving parties of a jury trial. Juries can't be

controlled by the judges to ensure that their favoured party

wins, so judges end cases before the people who should win

can reach a jury.

CONCLUSION

The Actions evidenced by Judge Allison Dale Burroughs against this

Plaintiff CANNOT be allowed to continue without legal

consequence(s). Doing so would at minimum - irreparably harm the

Plaintiff, wrongfully impact precedent, and will deprive the Nation

from substantial economic benefit. Furthermore, the Nation and ALL

Americans will be witness to a level of CORRUPTION of historic

proportion.

The Plaintiff respectfully calls for the following legal next steps:

1. Alignment with the Department of Justice, including the assignment

of a special prosecutor and the assembly of a Grand Jury; 2.

Immediate action by the Judicial Council, including Congressional

intervention (if necessary) to remove and replace Judge Burroughs

for reasons as stated within; 3. The Courts assistance with the

Page 23
appointment of Counsel; 4. Addressing the Safety concerns of the

Plaintiff; 5. With the filing of this Response (and additionally by

separate Motion) the Plaintiff files a NOTICE OF APPEAL, in the event

that the evidenced judicial misconduct against Judge Burroughs is

allowed to continue without accountability).

I. Certification and Closing

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, by signing below, I certify

to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief that this

Notice: (1) is not being presented for an improper purpose, such as

to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost

of litigation; (2) is supported by existing law or by a non-frivolous

argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law; (3)

the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically

so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a

reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

(4) the Motion otherwise complies with the requirements of Rule 11.

If the Court has ANY questions, or requires ANY additional

information or clarification, the Plaintiff is happy to provide upon

request.

Page 24
Respectfully Submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Mohan A. Harihar, Plaintiff, hereby certify that I have this day,


April 13, 2017, served the foregoing document upon all parties, by
electronically filing to all ECF registered parties (Includes ALL
Defendants).

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

Page 25
Attachment B

Page 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

MOHAN A. HARIHAR CIVIL ACTION NO: 15-cv-11880

Plaintiff

vs.

US BANK NA, et al.

Defendants

Notice of Appeal

Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiff, Mohan A. Harihar, acting

Pro Se in the above-named case hereby appeals to the United States

Court of Appeals for the First Federal Circuit from the US District

Court (Boston, MA), from the issued Order Dismissing ALL Claims

against the Defendants with prejudice, entered in this action on

April 3, 2017.

The Plaintiff respectfully states for the record that the referenced

Order of Dismissal is believed to be VOID, since the presiding Judge

Allison Dale Burroughs is considered to NO LONGER HAVE

JURISDICTION, and is therefore disqualified by law to issue such an

order. A JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT PETITION is STILL PENDING before the

Judicial Council of the First Circuit. The referenced Order of

Dismissal signifies a fifth (5th) act of TREASON to the Constitution

under Article III, and a Second Supplement to the Judicial

Page 27
Misconduct Petition is now necessarily filed with the Judicial

Council. Alignment with Federal prosecutors is now sought, as is the

initiation of a full criminal investigation, the assembly of a grand

jury, and assistance with the appointment of counsel. The evidenced

allegations which include TREASON and ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE have made

it necessary to additionally inform the President, members of

Congress, the Department of Justice (DOJ), FBI, and the US Inspector

General.

While it ultimately may be considered unnecessary to file this

NOTICE OF APPEAL, it has yet to be determined if Judicial Misconduct

extends beyond the US District Court. Already, there is concern

surrounding the initial opinion issued by Chief Justice Howard,

which has yet to be corrected. The Plaintiff respectfully states

that any failure to take corrective action in this matter shows

cause to bring additional judicial misconduct claims, and adds to

already existing claims filed against the United States.

Respectfully Submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

Page 28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Mohan A. Harihar, Plaintiff, hereby certify that I have this day,


April 14, 2017, served the foregoing document upon all parties, by
electronically filing to all ECF registered parties (Includes ALL
Defendants).

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

Page 29
Attachment C

Page 30
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM
Subject: Economic Espionage, Treason alleged against Judge Allison Dale Burroughs
To: president@whitehouse.gov
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, Civil.Feedback@usdoj.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, boston@ic.fbi.gov

Dear Mr. President,

As an American citizen, and documented as part of the record, I am respectfully reporting to your direct attention
- evidenced allegations of: TREASON under Article III of the US Constitution, and ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE,
pursuant to 18 U.S. Code 1832, against US District Court Judge - Allison Dale Burroughs. As you are
already aware, a Judicial Misconduct Petition filed against Judge Burroughs is currently under review by the
Judicial Council (First Circuit). With these latest allegations, a second supplement is now filed with the Judicial
Council. A copy of the second supplement is attached for your review. Please be advised, since claims of
misconduct have been made against the United States, the actual second supplement filed with the Judicial
Council will additionally include a copy of this (delivered) email communication (appearing as attachment C).
Additional parties copied (via email, US Mail, and/or Social Media) include: US Inspector General - Michael
Horowitz, US Attorney General - Jeff Sessions, the House Judiciary Committee, and the FBI. For safety
and security reasons, a copy is also made available to the Public.
The evidenced allegations of Treason and Economic Espionage against Judge Burroughs shows cause to
expand already existing claims against the United States that include (but are not limited to): Violations to Due
process, Color of Law Violations, Abuse of Process, and Federal Tort claims. These allegations show the
UNDENIABLE need for assistance with the appointment of counsel, as requested by the Plaintiff (and
repeatedly DENIED).

When I began this legal journey, I knew it would likely be a long road, and quite possibly a dangerous one. The
evidenced corruption exposed in this litigation confirms what many Americans already believe to be true.
Successfully validating these claims in a court of law is necessary to ensure a continued FAITH in our justice
system. Any failure to do so exposes (in part) a corrupt judicial system of historic proportion. For obvious
reasons, I fear for my safety and well-being. Documenting this legal journey and making it available to the public
is done to raise awareness, and for safety/security purposes.

Mr. President - at this time I respectfully request your assistance with the following:

1. As the head of the Executive Branch of Government, APPROVING the requested assignment of a
Special Prosecutor to the referenced litigation. Sadly, prior requests delivered to the attention of former
AG Loretta Lynch and President Obama were seemingly IGNORED;
2. Providing an ANSWER, whether or not the United States has interest in reaching a MUTUAL
AGREEMENT with the Plaintiff in the referenced litigation.
3. Gaining ALIGNMENT with the United States as it pertains to the POTENTIAL implementation of the
referenced Intellectual Property. Successful implementation of such an economic framework would
provide incremental avenues to pay for at minimum (and in their entirety), high-priority agenda topics
(i.e., both infrastructure, and also the border wall). I remain hopeful that justice here will ultimately
prevail, and that this communication(s) leads to having further discussion of the FCS Model.

Mr. President - Thank you for your time and consideration of this very serious matter. I look forward to your
response.

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Page 31
Most respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)

Page 32

You might also like