Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared By
March 2017
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1
Field Investigation and Condition Rating .................................................................................................... 11
Condition Assessment Summary ................................................................................................................ 13
Repair Methods and Costs .......................................................................................................................... 14
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 22
Background
The City of Brighton last performed a street assessment in the 1990s as a precursor to the Citys
street millage program. An annual program was undertaken that repaired or rebuilt the Citys
infrastructure up until the economic crisis in 2008/2009. Since that time only minor repairs have
been made due to funding constraints. As expected, the street condition has suffered in recent
years due to a lack of attention and recent increases in traffic throughout the City.
According to the current Act 51 tabulation the City has 12 miles of major roads and 18 miles of
local roads that it maintains and operates. Roadways are defined in four categories:
Prepared By
March 2017
Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1
Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1
Field Investigation and Condition Rating .................................................................................................... 11
Condition Assessment Summary ................................................................................................................ 13
Repair Methods and Costs .......................................................................................................................... 14
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 22
Background
The City of Brighton last performed a street assessment in the 1990s as a precursor to the Citys
street millage program. An annual program was undertaken that repaired or rebuilt the Citys
infrastructure up until the economic crisis in 2008/2009. Since that time only minor repairs have
been made due to funding constraints. As expected, the street condition has suffered in recent
years due to a lack of attention and recent increases in traffic throughout the City.
According to the current Act 51 tabulation the City has 12 miles of major roads and 18 miles of
local roads that it maintains and operates. Roadways are defined in four categories:
Presented in the following figures are samples from the field observation that illustrate the
condition of the roadway for each condition ranking. The PAVER database contains this individual
data for all streets in the City.
Presented in the following figures are samples from the field observation that illustrate the
condition of the roadway for each condition ranking. The PAVER database contains this individual
data for all streets in the City.
4 Bumps and Sags (LF) Low Severity Ride Quality Medium Severity Ride Quality High Severity Ride Quality
5 Corrugation (SF) Low Severity Ride Quality Medium Severity Ride Quality High Severity Ride Quality
16 Shoving (SF) Low Severity Ride Quality Medium Severity Ride Quality High Severity Ride Quality
18 Swell (SF) Low Severity Ride Quality Medium Severity Ride Quality High Severity Ride Quality
12 Polished Aggregate (SF) No degrees of severity are defined. However, the degree of polishing should be clearly evident. (Y/N)
9 Lane/Shoulder Drop-off (LF) > 1" 2" >2" 4" > 4"
14 Railroad Crossing (SF) Low Severity Ride Quality Medium Ride Quality High Severity Ride Quality
The street dimensions were also recorded during the field investigation. Length and width along
with type of pavement were noted for inclusion in the PAVER software. Since streets have a
variety of distress types it is difficult to inventory every failure point. The ASTM guidelines
2,000,000.00
1,800,000.00
1,600,000.00
SqFt of Roadway Surface
1,400,000.00
1,200,000.00
1,000,000.00
800,000.00
600,000.00
400,000.00
200,000.00
.00
FAILED Serious VERY POOR POOR FAIR Satisfactory GOOD
03-06-2017
A tabulation of all streets and their individual rankings is provided in the appendix.
Table 4 - Reconstruction
BranchID Name SectionID Length Units Area Units Rank PCI PCI Category
4100 Challis 01 453.0 Ft 32,594.00 SqFt B 39.00 Very Poor
2048 Church st 01 344.0 Ft 12,057.00 SqFt B 36.00 Very Poor
2049 Rickett rd 01 641.0 Ft 25,627.00 SqFt B 34.00 Very Poor
3065 W Main st 08 189.0 Ft 3,028.00 SqFt B 33.00 Very Poor
2049 Rickett rd 06 709.0 Ft 10,638.00 SqFt B 32.00 Very Poor
2049 Rickett rd 04 140.0 Ft 5,326.00 SqFt B 29.00 Very Poor
Table 5 - Maintenance
BranchID Name SectionID Length Units Area Units Rank PCI PCI Category
3065 W Main st 12 710.00 Ft 30,515.00 SqFt B 85.00 Satisfactory
3065 W Main st 01 363.00 Ft 8,714.00 SqFt B 85.00 Satisfactory
2049 Rickett rd 03 179.00 Ft 4,825.00 SqFt B 81.00 Satisfactory
3065 W Main st 06 327.00 Ft 10,464.00 SqFt B 78.00 Satisfactory
3065 W Main st 14 890.00 Ft 50,742.00 SqFt B 73.00 Satisfactory
3065 W Main st 04 371.00 Ft 16,308.00 SqFt B 72.00 Satisfactory
2053 Grand River 03 391.00 Ft 26,965.00 SqFt B 70.00 Fair
3065 W Main st 07 192.00 Ft 3,076.00 SqFt B 68.00 Fair
3065 W Main st 02 1,737.00 Ft 57,312.00 SqFt B 68.00 Fair
2049 Rickett rd 02 394.00 Ft 13,795.00 SqFt B 67.00 Fair
2049 Rickett rd 05 710.00 Ft 7,808.00 SqFt B 65.00 Fair
2053 Grand River 01 1,412.00 Ft 42,369.00 SqFt B 64.00 Fair
Annual maintenance such as crack sealing and bituminous patching provides the greatest return
in terms of condition for the dollars spent. Pavements retain their condition fairly well as long as
moisture penetration is prevented and small repairs addressed in a timely manner. As pavements
move from good to poor condition the timeframe accelerates towards failure.
The total cost to raise all roads to a PCI of 85 or better would be just less than $14,300,000.
Undertaking all the improvements in one project is unfeasible. However, the City can utilize the
PAVER software to plan for a desired condition, and with that, determine what magnitude of
funding would be required to achieve your goals.
As the City uses the PAVER tool for developing its capital improvement plan, the assumptions
and thresholds can be changed as deemed necessary. It may be desirable to have a different
threshold for reconstruction based on the type of street. For instance, the arterial streets may
have a PCI threshold of 60 before reconstruction given the criticality of the roadway and user
backlash if it falls into a poor or failing condition. This would change the annual budgeting and
the resultant increase in PCI based on the repair and maintenance actions selected.
It is also important to determine a goal for the overall PCI that the City wants to achieve. The
software provides inputs for an overall goal after five years and calculates the annual budget
required to reach this goal. Again, several trials and scenarios will need to be developed to
determine the goal that can be achieved given funding availability.
For this study it was assumed that any road rating below 40 would be reconstructed and others
would have maintenance activities performed. From this, two trial scenarios were run with the
PAVER software to illustrate the capabilities and order of magnitude for the road repair budget.
The first scenario shows the annual funding required to maintain the current PCI level. This is an
important benchmark in that as roadways age the condition decreases more sharply with time
from a fair to failure condition than from new to fair. The curve below shows this time versus
condition relationship and the anticipated costs in maintenance versus reconstruction.
The trial scenario to maintain the current PCI rating over the next five years resulted in an annual
budget of $1,500,000 distributed between those roads needing maintenance and some
reconstruction.
Table 7 - Annual Costs to Maintain PCI of 52
Major Under Major Above Layer
Stop Gap Preventive Global
Date Critical Critical Construct Total
Funded Funded Funded
Funded Funded Funded
For comparison purposes it was then assumed that the City would want to increase the overall
PCI rating and determine the annual budget allocation. Since the overall weighted average PCI
is 52, it was assumed that the condition goal after 5 years would be a modest increase to a PCI
of 60. Using the PAVER software budgeting application the City would need to budget $2,300,000
per year towards road reconstruction and maintenance to achieve the increase in overall PCI.
Table 8 - Annual Cost to Increase PCI from 52 to 60
Major Under Major Above Layer
Stop Gap Preventive Global
Date Critical Critical Construct Total
Funded Funded Funded
Funded Funded Funded
03-06-2017 $160,320.19 $418,375.47 $0.00 $1,434,968.28 $289,859.89 $0.00 $2,303,523.84
03-06-2018 $174,323.88 $339,086.90 $0.00 $1,790,673.60 $0.00 $0.00 $2,304,084.38
03-06-2019 $234,897.20 $416,990.42 $0.00 $1,650,582.60 $0.00 $0.00 $2,302,470.22
03-06-2020 $310,637.01 $502,512.46 $0.00 $1,489,723.62 $0.00 $0.00 $2,302,873.08
03-06-2021 $413,712.04 $387,474.78 $86,809.64 $1,414,072.74 $0.00 $0.00 $2,302,069.20
03-06-2022 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Conclusion
The City has an overall poor rating for its roadways. There are areas with failing pavements that
through planning can be addressed in a fiscally responsible manner. Utilizing the PAVER tool
will help prioritize the improvements and determine how to maximize the Citys investment in road
infrastructure. As improvements are planned and implemented throughout the City this data
should be entered into the database and progress reports developed. The next step will be to
incorporate the PAVER data into the Lucity platform which will allow real time tracking of the PCI
and identify future improvement project priorities.
01
Ch allis
interior dr
02
Brighton
02
03
Karl Grie mal
Lib r
02
a
ry d
01
De e
s
r
01
id e
02
04 02
03 Charles H. Ornd orf 01
De es id e
01
05
01
Cros s 03
Spring Mountain
5 St 4 02
01
04
d
tr
2nd st
01
l in
F
02
01
01
Advance
01
02
Gra
Will
n dR
ia
ms e
iv e
01
r
2nd st
n
dr
01
01 Wh intey
01
Ne
06
01 02
as t
Hil ve
Nelson st
lcr
01
Wa lnu t
a
st
01 02 r
ave
es
Be t
Fifth
t
st a ve
Church st
s
01
02
01
School
Fo urth
01
Hillcre
03
01
First
01
01
01 01 St.
01
01
Ce
Pa ul st
01
01
nt
6th
01
1
e r
01
Third
01 01
05
02
02
st. 01
01
Leith st
01
02
01
02
01
Fifth
05
Ma in 02
01
01
03
01
Ma in st
01
14 04
03
er
04
14
01
07 06
Ma in c
4th
01
12 09
13
en
01
SE
01
Sp
04
Hy ne st
as t
01
01
01
S. 4th st
02
01
03 03
r
Ma dis on er nce
St
tch 01
01
02
Sp e
01
u
S. 7th st
D
st
01
01
02
1s t st
01
01
03
01
01
Wa shington 01 r
nce
S. 3rd st
Sp e
01
01
01
01 02
01 Fra nk lin st 01
02
02
Livin gsto n
st 01 02 01
St
n
h to
Ho pe
Brig e rd
01
la k
Ric
01
Brigh ton st
02
ke
02
Gran
tt rd
d Riv e
01
03
r
01
Ro
03
Ric
de be
si r tso
ke
ke
02
nD Gran
La r d
tt rd
S. 3rd st
ke Riv e
01
02
r Be c r 01
an
Wa y
01
01
Ap pi
Kissane
01 02
02
01
02
03
Fa irw a y
Odohe rty
01
Tra ils
01 Glenwyth
01
02
03
02 01
Rita
An n
01
03
04
01
02
02
Glenw yth
Brighton
01
De vo
lake rd
06
Ap pia n
Wa y
n
sh ire
01
04
01 01
05
01
Oa kR ll M
B lv d
au
06 i dg e no
02
K r ic
04 Oa kR idg e u e
05 s
Si
01
Ri
c
04
02
ke
02 Summit st 01
trt
05
01
02
07
01
Linco ln
01
01 02
01
Fa irw a
01
Se wa rd
02
Alpin e dr 01
OakRidge
01
Tra ils
03
01
e
Pe pp e rg rov
Dr
02
Wh isp erin g Oaks
01
02 01
Lo
02
01
ng
Lea
02
01
e
f
Rid g 01 02
ern
Woo dla k e
02
rth
No
01
Woodlak e
01
circle
02 01 01
01
03
03
Walnut
01
Ba y
Black
02
wo od
Peppergrove
Hightree 01
02
01
wa lnu t
Bla ck
Heath er 02
02
01 Tree ln
01
10.1 - 25.0 40.1 - 55.0 70.1 - 85.0 City Boundary 0 0.25 ROAD ASSET CONDITIONS - PAVER PCI RATING
Miles