You are on page 1of 8

EDED20491 - Assessment 2

Please consult this document together with the unit profile to ensure you fully understand
the task.
It is desirable that you implement elements of this unit where possible in your placement.
However, it is fully understood that you may be working in a different area of the
curriculum, and you may not have digital resources at hand in your placement classroom. It
is preferable that you select a curriculum focus that lends itself to your best demonstration
of pedagogy, thus you may select one that it not taught during your placement.

Task overview
When you plan a sequence of learning experiences, it is always founded upon the nature of
the content, and your values and beliefs about effective classroom pedagogy and learning.

This task is designed to make explicit to the reader your decision-making process and
thinking as you plan and work towards the engagement of your learners in a short
sequence of lessons in your classroom. The designed learning sequence should meet the
descriptors of learning at the modification and redefinition levels of SAMR, and reflect the
digital pedagogy as have been expanded upon in Assessment 1: Reflective Synopsis. It
should demonstrate high-end digital pedagogy, and complex, problematic, authentic
learning that is expanded upon in the unit materials, Week 6.

The learning sequence will be drawn from an idea/site/resource that you have
discovered online. The assessment task uses digital curation as a collaborative
process through which you will share, and possibly find your selected resource.
As part of the process of finding and selecting resources, you will create and share,
and engage with others through the creation of a digital curated collection of
artefacts in a Scoop.it site. As with Assessment 1, this task is built upon timely and
active participation in the course and its activities.
As a group, you are inter-dependent, and you will demonstrate and evidence this
professional engagement through interchanges in your curated digital collections of
teaching ideas. This interchange will inform a final reflection on your professional
engagement as it is aligned with AITSL Graduate Standards 6.2 and 7.4.

Your decision-making processes will be scaffolded through a series of tasks,


embedded in the Moodle materials. Each of the tasks will result in the creation of an
artefact. Together, these artefacts will justify your decisions as you plan your learning
series, and which act together as a collection of items that are presented in a
portfolio that demonstrates your insight.
Your portfolio will culminate in a learning narrative, which is written from the
perspective of a learner in your classroom. It is the story of the key events
experienced by your learner as they proceed through the learning sequence. It will
evidence the actioning of the plans that you have drawn together.

Your portfolio will be presented as a Weebly website, however it is anticipated that it will
likely include artefacts (linked and embedded) that may be presented in other online sites.

The total length of this task is anticipated to be the equivalent of 3000 words.

Task Details
The portfolio artefacts are created regularly throughout Weeks 6 10. Details and models
will be presented in the Moodle materials each week.
They must include the following, in the form of your choice:
A pedagogy map that integrates your personal pedagogical framework (from Week
2) with the Australian Curriculum: General Capabilities for your discipline area.
An extension of your pedagogy map to include alignment of ICT with each focus area
with reference to their capacity to support learning across the SAMR framework.
A link to a curated collection of digital resources, in which a single resource/artefact
is selected to underpin the design of a learning sequence that maximises the
potential of digital pedagogy. If you are combining more than one element, identify
both/all of them.
A link to your curators insight which is attached to your single resource/artefact (or
your nominated collection) in your curated collection that shares your insight into the
value of the artefact(s) to support transformative learning design, and how it will be
used in your classroom context.
The development of a learning sequence, based on this selected resource/artefact
that reflects the pedagogy identified in your pedagogy map, as well as the use of
digital technologies to transform learning as identified in your ICT alignment. The
pedagogical links should be clearly identifiable.
A brief profile of a representative student in your class, including their learning
needs.
A narrative written from the perspective of the student (written in first person),
showing how your students will live the digital pedagogy that you have identified in
your pedagogy and ICT alignment map.

As in Assessment task 1, these artefacts are regarded as documentation of your learning


from Weeks 6 through 12, and it is not intended that they are only created for assessment
purposes. Thus, it is anticipated that they are generated progressively through the term in
response to the course materials and activities.

Artefact Details

Pedagogy Map (Week 6)


The materials presented in Week 6 will combine with your Week 2 reflections to inform and
enhance your pedagogy.
Any successful classroom activity starts with a joint consideration of the nature of the
teaching discipline, and the pedagogy that best suits learning in that discipline area.
Assessment 2 acknowledges this by initiating your submission with a reflection on your
pedagogy, with particular reference to your selected teaching discipline.

The general capabilities of the Australian Curriculum in your discipline area will inform your
pedagogy, and the specific capabilities that your students should develop in your
classroom. It is used in this course to align and frame your pedagogy. The course materials
will explore pedagogy in greater depth through an exploration of authentic, problem-based
learning. Your pedagogy map can be presented in any form, but consider the way that the
modality of communication will support the organisation and flow of ideas. It should
contain:

a list of key ideas and elements from the general capabilities,

an outline of the pedagogies that may be relevant in learning design to support these
capabilities
the identification of low-end and high-end pedagogies with regard to the general
capabilities for their respective purposes in your classroom

ICT Alignment (Week 7)


Your pedagogy map will include your links between the Australian Curriculum: General
Capabilities and your personal beliefs about pedagogy. ICT provides the opportunity to
transform your pedagogy. Your pedagogy map will be modified (it can be copied and
adapted) to include an overview (illustrative) outline of how ICT could be used in each
pedagogical context. You are welcome to present this as a separate
document/page/resource.

Digital Curation Collection and professional interaction with your colleagues and
the teaching community (Weeks 8 and 9)
Set up a Scoop.it account. Locate resources and ideas and add them to your curated
collection. Browse the collections of others in our group, and re-scoop relevant ideas from
them. Add to at least three of your resources a brief curators insight that lends
understanding of how it could be used to transform learning in your classroom. This will
demonstrate your understanding of SAMR.
Your final activity in Week 7 will be to select one artefact, resource or idea from your
collection (it can be the ideas of others that are re-scooped) upon which to base a short
learning sequence that meets the definitional requirements of Modification and
Redefinition. An example will be provided in the Moodle materials.
You will add to that artefact an expanded curators insight in which you will communicate
your thinking and plans about how this artefact will support your thinking or activity, or
your students thinking and activity in your learning design.

Your Weebly portfolio will contain a link to your curated collection, as well as a specific link
to your selected artefact and its curators insight.

Development of learning sequence (Week 10)


You will draw on your selected artefact, and your curators insight to present an overview of
a learning sequence that integrates your thinking, and which illustrates clearly:
a) The purpose of your selected artefact to inform the design and implementation of
your sequence;
b) Your pedagogy and ICT use by yourself and students as identified in your pedagogy
and ICT map what ICT will be used, and what will be created with it. What is the
learning purpose of the use of ICT?
In this task, you will create an overview of your planned sequence, including links to your
curriculum outcomes. It need not be a unit plan, simply a sequence of teacher and learner
events and actions over the duration of the sequence. It should clearly evidence the
different roles of the teachers and learners in a problem-based, authentic learning
sequence at the transformative end of the SAMR scale.
Whilst content is of critical importance in your teaching, the emphasis of this plan is the
pedagogy and activity that underpin learning of this content. Please do not present merely
a sequence of content acquisition for this task.
You should also include a table that outlines which ICT will be used, where in the unit it will
be used, its purpose for learning, who will use it (student or teacher).
Learning Narrative (Week 11)
You will write a brief profile of a nominated learner and his/her characteristics as a Gen Z
learner. You may elect to identify a student with special needs and demonstrate your
capacity to differentiate learning for an identified need.
You will write a narrative (in first person) from the perspective of your nominated learner as
he/she participates in your learning sequence. Their experience of the digital pedagogies
and strategies that you have outlined in your plans should be clearly evident in their
narrative.
Treat this as if it is a short chapter in a novel you will not include all situational details or
interactions, however you should present sufficient to support a full understanding by the
reader of the experience of your nominated student.
These elements will be included in your Weebly portfolio. When grading this task, the
markers are looking for clear alignment between the values and beliefs of transformed
pedagogy, valid use of digital pedagogy, the needs of your learners, the pedagogical
principles that underpin complex learning, and the experience of your student.

Reflection on Online Professional Learning networks (Week 11 and Week 12)


You will write and present a reflection using the theory and rationale behind online
professional learning networks, your own learning experience of online networking and
support (through artefacts and/or links) of your online participation and contribution to
evidence AITSL Graduate Standards 6.2 and 7.4. This reflection will be presented in your
Weebly portfolio. The markers are looking for evidence that the professional practice you
claim as a graduate teacher is clearly indicated in your patterns of professional
engagement and participation. Are the beliefs that you present in this reflection aligned
with those demonstrated in your engagement with course activities?

Submission
You will submit a single Word document with a link to your Weebly website. Please ensure
that any username and password details are communicated in the Word document. Any
artefacts that cannot be accessed will not be considered when assessing your work.
Please note: The conditions in the Course Profile stipulate that Assessment 2 must be
passed, together with an overall passing grade, in order to pass this subject. The purpose of
this course is to engage you in theory and practice with regard to digital pedagogy.
Ultimately, it will be expressed in your plans for your own classroom.

Learning Design Criteria: EDSE12024 Digital Pedagogies in Secondary Schools -


Assessment task 2 Portfolio: e-learning design

Student: Grade: .

Learni
High
ng Distinction Credit Pass (25-
Distinction Fail (<25)
Outco (37.5-42) (32.5-37) 32)
(42.5-50)
me

Propos The The The The The learning


e pedagogy pedagogy pedagogy pedagogy design does not
learnin map and map and map and map and evidence the
g learning learning learning learning principles of
Learni
High
ng Distinction Credit Pass (25-
Distinction Fail (<25)
Outco (37.5-42) (32.5-37) 32)
(42.5-50)
me

strateg design design design design learner-


ies evidences evidences evidences evidences a centeredness
that genuinely learner- substantial selection of that are
are learner- centred elements of elements of promoted as a
inclusi centred and approaches learner- learner- focus of the
ve and creative to digital centred centred course.
learner approaches learning, approaches approaches
- to digital with relevant to digital to digital
centre learning that justification learning, with learning,
d. interprets, using relevant with relevant
(Evide implements pedagogical justification justification
nce of and is principles using using
theoret justified by presented in pedagogical pedagogical
ical the the course, principles principles
insight pedagogical and student- presented in presented in
into principles provided the course, the course.
pedag presented in sources. The and student- At times the
ogy) the course, planning provided differentiatio
and student- process is sources. The n between
provided approached planning traditional
sources. The as process, and
planning problematic through the contemporar
process is and rationale and y approaches
approached attempts at design, to digital
as discriminatin evidence learning is
problematic g between engagement not clearly
and clear contemporar with the core articulated;
discriminatio y and values and however
n is traditional beliefs about there is
demonstrate approaches digital evidence of
d in to digital learning that an attempt
identifying learning are promoted to respond to
contemporar design are in the course. the values
y beliefs evident in involved.
about digital the rationale
learning that and design.
are
integrated
into the
rationale and
design.
Partici AITSL AITSL AITSL AITSL The student
pate in Standards 6.2 Standards Standards 6.2 Standards makes minimal
and and 7.4 are 6.2 and 7.4 and 7.4 are 6.2 and 7.4 use of ideas
contrib clearly are linked to linked to the are linked to presented by
ute to articulated the theory of theory of the the theory of others, or fails
the and linked to the PLN. PLN. the PLN and to acknowledge
develo the theory of Reflection on Reflection on to the them; OR the
pment the PLN. learning learning students ideas are not
of a Reflection on process and process and experience appropriate to
profess learning outcomes outcomes as the learning and
ional process and identify key identify key contributor teaching
online outcomes professional professional and context;
learnin identify key outcomes outcomes participant. AND/OR the
Learni
High
ng Distinction Credit Pass (25-
Distinction Fail (<25)
Outco (37.5-42) (32.5-37) 32)
(42.5-50)
me

g professional and and The creative ideas are


comm outcomes consideratio consideration ideas of presented as
unity. and ns and are s. others are they were
(Evide consideration linked to the The creative identified accessed with
nce of s and are theory. ideas of and little evidence
collabo linked to the The creative others are acknowledge of their
rative theory. ideas of identified and d through transformation
engag The creative others are acknowledge interaction in to better suit
ement ideas of identified d through blogs, a the learning
in others are and interaction in curated context.
profess identified and acknowledge blogs, a Scoop.it The student
ional acknowledge d through curated collection, does not
comm d through interaction in Scoop.it and are provide
unity) interaction in blogs, a collection, evidenced in evidence of
blogs, and a curated and are the unit participation in
curated Scoop.it evidenced in learning either blogs, or
Scoop.it collection, the unit design. Scoop.it
collection, and are learning There is networks.
and are evidenced in design. The sufficient
evidenced in the unit modality and evidence to
the unit learning communicati support
learning design. The on of claims to
design. The modality and evidenced engagement
modality and communicati ideas are in the
communicati on of designed to professional
on of evidenced engage in a learning of
evidenced ideas are professional the online
ideas are designed to learning of community.
designed to engage in a the online
contribute professional community.
new learning of
knowledge to the online
the community.
professional
learning of
the online
community
and thus
engage with
its
philosophy.
Develo The learning The learning The learning The learning The learning
p and experiences experiences experiences experiences experiences are
evalua are designed are designed are designed draw upon highly teacher-
te to maximise to use the to use the the potential centred and
strateg the potential potential of potential of of ICT to teacher-directed
ies to of ICT to ICT to ICT to differentiate which fails to
differe differentiate differentiate differentiate learning at accommodate
ntiate learning learning learning times the different
learnin through through through through learning needs
g in consideration consideratio consideration some of students.
ICT- of the type of n of the type of the type of consideration
rich task, the of task, the task, the of the type of
learnin scaffolding scaffolding scaffolding task, or the
Learni
High
ng Distinction Credit Pass (25-
Distinction Fail (<25)
Outco (37.5-42) (32.5-37) 32)
(42.5-50)
me

g and and and scaffolding


enviro pedagogy pedagogy pedagogy and
nment used, and the used, and used, and/or pedagogy
s to degree of the degree the degree of used, and/or
meet open- of open- open- the degree of
individ endedness of endedness endedness of open-
ual the learning of the the learning endedness of
learnin outcomes; learning outcomes; the learning
g together with outcomes; and modality outcomes;
needs. the modality and modality of and/or
(Evide of learner- of demonstratio modality of
nce of demonstratio demonstrati n of these demonstratio
pedag n of these on of these outcomes; n of these
ogicall outcomes. outcomes; together with outcomes;
y together the modality together with
sound with the of learner- the modality
and modality of demonstratio of learner-
approp learner- n of these demonstratio
riate demonstrati outcomes. n of these
use of on of these outcomes.
ICT in outcomes.
planni
ng a
learnin
g
sequen
ce)
Design The learning The learning The learning The learning The learning
and design design design meets design meets design does not
create responds to responds to the interests many of the respond to the
learnin and and and interests and interests,
g plans acknowledge acknowledge characteristic characteristi characteristics
in s implicitly s implicitly s of the cs of the and needs of
which and explicitly the interests learners and learners and learners. The
learner the interests and is responsive is linked to experience of
engag and characteristi to their their needs. the learner
ement characteristic cs of the needs. The The demonstrates
is s of the learners and experience of experience activity at the
transfo learners and is responsive the learner is of the substitution or
rmed is highly to their significantly learner is augmentation
by the responsive to needs. The enhanced enhanced level at least,
use of their needs. experience because of because of and does not
ICT. The of the the pedagogy the reflect any
(align experience of learner is and the use pedagogy significant
ment the learner is transformed of digital and the use change the task
with clearly because of technologies. of digital design, learning
mappi transformed the technologies. process or
ng and because of pedagogy outcomes.
theory the pedagogy and the use
as and the use of digital
demon of digital technologies
strated technologies. .
in
studen
Learni
High
ng Distinction Credit Pass (25-
Distinction Fail (<25)
Outco (37.5-42) (32.5-37) 32)
(42.5-50)
me

t
experi
ence
narrati
ve)

Model The student The student The student The student The student
and models, models, models, models, fails to model
suppor through through through through appropriate
t safe, consideration consideratio consideration consideration legal, safe or
legal of legal, safe n of legal, of legal, safe of legal, safe ethical practice.
and and ethical safe and and ethical and ethical
ethical practice, ethical practice, practice,
practic appropriate practice, appropriate appropriate
e practice in appropriate practice in practice in
his/her web practice in his/her web his/her web
spaces and his/her web spaces and spaces and
use of spaces and use of use of
resources. use of resources. resources.
Each learning resources. Each learning Each
experience is Each experience is learning
accompanied learning accompanied experience is
by insight experience by some accompanied
and is consideration by some
consideration accompanie of this consideration
of this d by a practice by of this
practice by contextual learners practice by
learners consideratio through an learners.
through an n of this analysis of
analysis of practice by the potential
the potential learners for problems.
for problems, through an
and analysis of
associated the potential
protocols for for
their problems.
avoidance.

You might also like