Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hideo Semba
JICA Study Team
Contents
1. Objective
2. Workflow & Organization
3. Present Situation of Barangay Electrification
4. Proposed Plan of Barangay Electrification
5. Selection Method
6. Database
7. Summary
Collaboration Work on Preparing
Rural Electrification (R/E) Plan
DOE : Main
R/E Plan Preparation
NPC-SPUG
NEA
JICA Team
Discuss Concept & Step for R/E Plan
Draw Work Flow for R/E Plan
Prepare Map for Project Monitoring etc
Basic Concept of R/E Promotion (On / Off Grid)
Issues
Huge Investment Low Demand in Rural Area
Long Time
Not Feasible
Advice
Efficient Combination of Grid
Extension and Stand-Alone System
Objective and Situation of
Rural Electrification Plan
?
? Total
Total Electrification
Electrification of
of the
the Philippine
Philippine
?
? Promote
Promote Private
Private Investment
Investment inin
Missionary
Missionary Electrification
Electrification
?
? Commercialize
Commercialize // privatize
privatize existing
existing
SPUG
SPUG areas
areas
?
? Institutional
Institutional Relationship
Relationship
?
? Regulatory
Regulatory Aspects
Aspects
Source : NEA Documents
Share of MEDP & DDP
Un-Energized
Un-Energized Barangay
Barangay
Total
Total :: 5,409
5,409
ECs
ECs :: 5,277
5,277
PIOU/LGU
PIOU/LGU :: 132
132
MEDP DDP
Image of Cover Area of DDP & MEDP
MEDP
Un-electrified Pref. A : Rate
Nominated
Village (off-grid) 60% Village by Grid
Extension
Pref. D : Rate
55%
Pref. B : Rate
70%
Electrified Future
Village Grid Extension
Work
Viable / Unviable areas within CAPEX and OPEX Viable / Unviable areas within
its franchise area New Installation Plan its franchise area
Work
NEA Results
Viable Flow
Flow
NEA Verified?
Verify E.C. data
Viable / Un-viable Un-viable
15 / Mar 2003
to DOE Un-viable
PIOUDP
List(PIOU)
Results Viable
Verified?
DOE : Rural Electrification Plan
DUs Budget
Un-viable Un-viable SPUG NECDDP QTPs Fund
NEA Check List(NEA)
CAPEX
adjoining E.C PIOUDP
Un-viable OPEX Area of Yes
List(PIOU) New installation
plan Area of No
DU
Other EC Yes
QTP
interested?
MEDP 2004-2008
No
SPUGs
PDP July 2003 2004 MEP
Un-viable
NECDDP No DOE
List(NEA)
Prioritization
No
SPUGs ERC
MEDP 2003 Petition 2003 SPUG
Decision?
2003 MEP for U.C. to ERC Yes Missionary Electrification
Yes
15/Mar 2003 Project
New Industry Relationships
JCPC
ERC PSALM DOE
Corp.
NPC NEA
WESM Industry
IndustryParticipants
S
Participants P
U
G
LEGEND:
Oversight Regulation Coordination Ownership/ Policymaking Operation Supervision
Source : DOE Control
Presentation Competitive Regulated
Rural Electrification Family
QTPs
QTPs DOE
DOE
Financing,
Financing,Project
Project Policy
PolicyDirection-Goal
Direction-GoalSetting,
Setting,
Implementation
Implementation&& Program
ProgramManagement,
Management,
Operation
Operation Coordination
Coordination
ERC
ERC
Rate
RateDesign,
Design,
Licensing
Licensingof
ofQTPs
QTPs Rural
Rural
Electrification
Electrification
NEA/ECs,
NEA/ECs, PIOUs
PIOUs
Project
ProjectIdentification,
Identification,
NPC-SPUG
NPC-SPUG Implementation,
Implementation,
Petitioner
Petitionerof
ofShare
Shareof
ofMEDP
MEDPfrom
fromUCUC Monitoring
Monitoring
Project
ProjectImplementation,
Implementation,Operation
Operation
Historical Performance of Rural
Electrification (1999 - 2002)
70%
57%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ARMM
Region 10
Region 11
Region 12
Region 1
Region 2
Region 3
Region 5
Region 6
Region 7
Region 8
Region 9
Region 4-B
CAR
Region 4-A
CARAGA
Proposed Number of Rural Electrification
As of Jun 2003
Rural Electrification Promotion
by Organization
40
0 Un-electrified Barangays (2003 - 2006)
914
600 2,406
78
811
560
NEA NPC-SPUG DOE PIOUS/LGUS PNOC-EDC IPPs Adopt a Barangay Others
Appraisal of Universal Charge
140 44
Barangay Barangay
30
20
10
0
1
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
Time
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
kWh/day/household
10km from Grid Line
Grid Extension VS PV(Aurora)
P1000/kWh
0.60
Grid 170 households
Grid 50 households
0.50 Grid 100 households
Grid 250 households
PV
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
kWh/day/household
5km from Grid Line
Grid Extension VS PV(Aurora)
P1000/kWh
0.30
Grid 170 households
Grid 50 households
0.25 Grid 100 households
Grid 250 households
PV
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
kWh/day/household
0.5km from Grid Line
Grid Extension VS PV(Santiago)
P1000/kWh
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
kWh/day/household
<Result (example)>
Household : 170
Distance from Grid : 25km
Load > 0.3kWh/Day.HH : Grid Extension
Load< 0.3kWh/Day.HH : PV system
0.7
Grid 170 households
0.6 Grid 50 households
Grid 100 households
0.5 Grid 250 households
PV
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1 5 10 15 20 25
km
<Result (example)>
Assumption of Consumption : 0.1kWh/Day.HH
Household : 250
Distance > 15km : PV system
Distance< 15km : Grid
Extension
Household : 170
Distance > 10km : PV system
Distance< 10km : Grid
Extension
Household : 100
Distance > 5km : PV system
Distance< 5km : Grid Extension
Distance< 3km
Grid Extension is cost feasible
Factors for Consideration
1st Stage
Municipality Level & Each Regions &
Each ECs Level Data ECs Completed
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75%
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable
Municipality Border
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
REGION 1
Example Map
MAP OF ELECTRIFICATION RATIO
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75%
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable
Municipality Border
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
1. Adams
2. Bacarra
3. Bangui
4. Burgos
5. Carasi 8
6. Dumalneg
4 3
7. Laoag City
6
8. Pagudpud
9. Pasuguin
1
10. Piddig
11. Sarrat
12. Vintar
9
13. Badoc
14. Batac
15. Currimao 2
16. Dingras
12
17. Espiritu 7 5
10
18. Marcos 22 11
19. Nueva Era
20. Paoay
16 23
21. Pinili
20
22. San Nicolas
14 18
23. Solsona 15
17
21
13 19
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75% 8
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable 2
Municipality Border 6
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
4
1. Bantay 10
2. Cabugao
5
3. Caoayan 7
1
4. Magsingal 9
11
5. San IIdefonso 3
6. San Juan
26
7. San Vicente
20
8. Sinait
21
9. Sta. Catalina
10. Sto. Domingo 31
11. Vigan
25 14
12. Alilem
13. Banayoyo
27 19
14. Burgos 13 24
15. Candon 15
18
16. Cervantes
17. Del Pilar 17
18. Galimuyod 30 23
19. Lidlidda
22
29 28
20. Nagbukel 16
21. Narvacan
22. Quirino 33
23. Salcedo
24. San Emilio 34
12
25. San Esteban
26. Santa
27. Santiago
28. Sigay
29. Sta. Cruz
30. Sta. Lucia
31. Sta. Maria 32
32. Sugpon
33. Suyo
34. Tagudin
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75%
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable
Municipality Border
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
3
1. Bacnotan 4 7
2. Balaoan 2
3. Bangar
4. Luna
5. San Gabriel
6. Santol 6
1
7. Sudipen
8. Agoo
5
9. Aringay B3
10. Bagulin
11. Burgos B1
12. Caba 10
13. Nagulian
14. Pugo
15. Rosario
16. Sto. Tomas
B2 13 11
17. Tubao
B1. San Fernando City
B2. Bauang
B3. San Juan 12
17
8
14
16
15
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75%
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable
Municipality Border
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
1. Agno
2. Alaminos
3. Anda
4. Bani
5. Bolinao
6. Burgos
7. Dasol
5
8. Infanta
9. Mabini
4
2
6 9
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75%
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable
Municipality Border
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
1. 1. Sual
2. Aguilar
3. Basista
4. Binmaley
5. Bugallon
6. Labrador
7. Lingayen B3
8. Mangatarem
9. Urbiztondo
10. Bayambang 1 13 B4
11. Malasiqui
B2
12. San Carlos City
6 4
13. Mangaldan
7 B1
14. Alcala
B5
15. Bautista
5 12
B1. Calasiao
B2. Dangupan City 11
B3. San Fabian 2 3
B4. San Jacinto 14
B5. Sta. Barbara 9 10
15
8
Legend
90% and above
89% to 75%
74% to 50%
Under 49%
Data unavailable
Municipality Border
Electric Utilities Jurisdiction
1. Mapandan
2. Binalonan
3. Laoac
4. Pozorrubio
5. Sto. Tomas
6. Urdaneta City
7. Villasis
8. Asingan
9. Balungao
10. Natividad 4 13
12
11. Rosales
12. San Manuel 2 10
B1
13. San Nicolas 16
14. San Quintin
3 8
1
15. Sta. Maria
16. Tayug 14
6 15
17. Umingan
B1. Manaoag 17
7
5 9
11
Municipality
Level
Example
We can manage
Barangay level
Advantages of Mapping
Obtain Funding
Regulatory Framework
Summary
1. Work Flow
Work flow was drawn by cooperation of R/E families. This work flow
will utilize for future planning.
2. Rural Electrification Program
DOE and Team discuss 5 years rural electrification planning concept.
Examples of electrification selection procedure is indicated. The
output of other activity and this study is taking into account, DOE
start to prepare MEDP.
3. Present Situation of Rural Electrification
Information were collected and analyzed. Based on those
information, electrification ratio map were made for DOEs database.
4. Selection Method of Electrification
Rough calculation results were indicated. However, for specified
Barangay, more practical assumption (Location, HH, Access,
Distance, Consumption etc ) is required.