You are on page 1of 4

Accessed from 128.83.63.

20 by nEwp0rt1 on Tue Jun 05 05:17:06 EDT 2012

5630 123 Glucagon Bioidentity Tests / Biological Tests Second Supplement to USP 35NF 30

Add the following:

123 GLUCAGON BIOIDENTITY TESTS


.

DEFINITION
Glucagon is a polypeptide hormone that increases blood glu-
cose levels via release of liver glycogen stores and is clinically
used to treat hypoglycemia. Human, porcine, and bovine glu-
cagon share an identical 29 amino acid sequence. Commer-
cially available Glucagon was previously purified from bovine
and porcine pancreas glands. Today, human glucagon is
recombinantly produced (rGlucagon) with various microbial
fermentation systems using the human amino acid sequence.
The USPNF Glucagon for Injection monograph defines glu-
cagon identification tests. Glucagon bioidentity must be de-
termined using a validated bioassay method approved by a
competent authority. The bioassay must demonstrate that the
manufacturing process produces Glucagon that has a biologic
activity of NLT 0.80 USP Unit/mg of glucagon. This chapter
describes a validated glucagon bioidentity test that measures
glucose released from freshly prepared rat liver cells (hepato-
cytes) stimulated with Glucagon in vitro.
ASSAY
PRIMARY LIVER CELL ASSAY
[NOTEAll buffers are oxygenated, prepared with either Ster-
ile Water for Injection or Sterile Water for Irrigation, warmed
to 37, and adjusted to a final pH of 7.4 unless otherwise
indicated. At least two independent assays (replicates) must
be performed utilizing two rat livers for each lot of Glu-
cagon. Figure 1 demonstrates the process used to generate Figure 1. Rat hepatocyte assay method flow diagram
one replicate value. A minimum of two replicates are com- (RS = Reference Standard).
bined according to the Calculations section. The concentra-
tion range of the Standard preparations and the Assay prep- Hepatocyte Preparation
arations may be modified to fall within the linear range of Calcium-free perfusion buffer with dextrose: Prepare a
the Assay, and the calculations can be adjusted accord- solution containing 7.92 g/L of sodium chloride, 0.35 g/L
ingly. Alternatively, full curve analysis using validated non- of potassium chloride, 1.80 g/L of dextrose, 0.19 g/L of
linear statistical methods can be used, provided that simi- edetic acid (EDTA), and 2.38 g/L of 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-
larity is demonstrated when analysts compare the responses piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES). Oxygenate before
of the Standard preparations and the Assay preparations.] use.

Official from December 1, 2012


Copyright (c) 2012 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
Accessed from 128.83.63.20 by nEwp0rt1 on Tue Jun 05 05:17:06 EDT 2012

Second Supplement to USP 35NF 30 Biological Tests / 123 Glucagon Bioidentity Tests 5631

Collagenase buffer: Prepare a solution containing 3.62 g/L tonic 0.4% trypan blue solution. Load aliquots of the cell
of sodium chloride, 23.83 g/L of HEPES, 0.35 g/L of potas- suspension into both chambers of a hemocytometer, and
sium chloride, 0.52 g/L of calcium chloride, and 1.8 g/L of count all 8 quadrants. To meet system suitability of the cell
dextrose. Adjust to a pH of 7.6. Immediately before perfu- preparation method, a viable cell concentration of 3 106
sion, dissolve a quantity of collagenase in this solution to cells/mL (acceptable range of 2.5 106 to 3.4 106
obtain a concentration of 0.02%0.05%. The exact con- cells/mL) must be obtained to proceed with the bioassay. If
centration of collagenase is determined empirically for each the viable cell concentration exceeds the upper limit, addi-
new lot of enzyme and is the amount that can consistently tional Incubation buffer may be added to the cells to adjust
dissociate the tissue within 10 min of buffer entry and pro- the concentration to 3 106 cells/mL. In this case, the cells
duce a viable cell concentration of NLT 3 106 cells/mL. are counted again in a hemocytometer, as described above
Wash buffer: Prepare a solution containing 7.92 g/L of so- to verify the concentration. [NOTEViable cells are those
dium chloride, 0.35 g/L of potassium chloride, 0.19 g/L of cells that exclude the trypan blue.]
EDTA, 2.38 g/L of HEPES, 0.11 g/L of calcium chloride, and Glucose Determination
0.06 g/L of magnesium sulfate. Negative control solution: Prepare a solution containing
Incubation buffer: Prepare a solution containing 6.19 g/L 0.5% BSA using Sterile Water for Injection or Sterile Water for
of sodium chloride, 0.35 g/L of potassium chloride, 0.22 Irrigation.
g/L of calcium chloride, 0.12 g/L of magnesium sulfate, Incubation flasks: Use specially prepared 25-mL conical
0.16 g/L of monobasic potassium phosphate, 11.915 g/L of flasks, the bottoms of which have been heated and pushed
HEPES, and 10 g/L of bovine serum albumin (1% BSA). Ad- inward to form a conically raised center, or similar flasks
just to a pH of 7.5. that allow sufficient mixing when swirling. Place the Incu-
Test animals: Male Sprague-Dawley rats are maintained on bation flasks in an orbital shaker water bath at 35.
a standard rat chow diet, given water ad libitum, and al- Standard preparations: On the day of the assay, dissolve
lowed to adjust to their new housing before testing. On two vials of USP rGlucagon RS, accurately measured, in
the morning of the test, select a healthy rat weighing ap- 0.01 N hydrochloric acid or other suitable diluent (volume
proximately 300 g, and administer 100 Units of Heparin based on the potency of the Reference Standard lot) to
Sodium subcutaneously. obtain two solutions each containing 1 USP rGlucagon
Procedure: [NOTEConduct this procedure in the morning Unit/mL. All dilutions thereafter are made using Negative
to ensure that the rat has optimal glycogen in its liver and control solution. Accurately dilute measured volumes of each
so that the procedure can be completed in one day.] Anes- solution with Negative control solution to obtain an interme-
thetize the rat with an appropriate anesthetic. Open the diate concentration of 400 U/mL, and then dilute the in-
abdominal cavity, and isolate the portal vein. Insert an termediate to produce five concentrations: 200, 100, 50,
angiocatheter and tie into the portal vein at the general 25, and 12.5 U/mL (Standard preparations). Pipet 0.1 mL
location of the lienal branch and then connect to a perfu- of each Standard preparation into separate Incubation flasks.
sion pump. Start the perfusion (25 mL/min) in situ with the Pipet 0.1 mL of Negative control solution into each of two
previously warmed, oxygenated, Calcium-free perfusion flasks (Negative control solutions 1 and 2).
buffer with dextrose. As the liver enlarges, cut the inferior Assay preparations: Using accurately weighed quantities of
vena cava to allow pressure equilibrium. [NOTEAbout 300 Glucagon samples, proceed as directed for Standard prepa-
mL of the perfusate is needed to clear the liver of red rations or, if testing Glucagon for Injection, reconstitute 10
blood cells at a flow rate of 2560 mL/min.] Then circulate vials by slowly adding the contents of the accompanying
Collagenase buffer at an appropriate flow rate so that the prefilled syringes containing an appropriate glucagon dilu-
liver leaks perfusate out of the lobes in approximately 10 ent. Gently mix each vial until the glucagon is dissolved.
min (typically 2560 mL/min). When the liver significantly Using the same syringes, withdraw the contents of 5 vials
increases in size, changes color and consistency, and starts and place the solutions in a 25-mL volumetric flask. Repeat
to leak perfusate out of the lobes, change the system to for the second 5 vials, transferring the contents to a second
the oxygenated prewarmed Wash buffer. About 100 mL of 25-mL volumetric flask. Dilute each flask with 0.01 N hy-
Wash buffer is needed to wash the liver of collagenase at a drochloric acid to volume. Dilute an accurate amount of
flow rate of 25 mL/min. Surgically remove the liver from each solution with 0.5% BSA to yield a concentration of
the animal, and place in a prewarmed Petri dish containing 400 U/mL, and dilute the intermediate to produce five
a small amount of oxygenated Wash buffer (37). Gently Assay preparation concentrations: 200, 100, 50, 25, and
comb the liver with a stainless steel, fine-toothed comb to 12.5 U/mL. Then proceed as directed for the Standard
free the hepatocytes. Filter and wash the hepatocytes with preparations.
Wash buffer, through prewetted cheesecloth (3 layers thick, Reference stock solution: Dry USP Dextrose RS, and then
or through a 150-m mesh polyethylene net) into a transfer 1.0 g, accurately weighed, to a 100-mL volumetric
beaker. Transfer the cells to two centrifuge tubes, and spin flask. Dissolve in and dilute with saturated benzoic acid so-
for about 1 min at 600 rpm. Discard the supernatant frac- lution to volume.
tions, and resuspend the two pellets in Incubation buffer. Reference solutions: Transfer suitable quantities of Refer-
Combine the two pellets in a suitable container, and add ence stock solution to 4 flasks, and dilute with saturated
sufficient Incubation buffer to make 150 mL. benzoic acid solution to obtain Reference solutions having
System suitability of cell preparation: The cell yield may concentrations of 100, 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/L.
vary because of the collagenase activity and the viability of Potassium ferrocyanide solution: Dissolve 1.25 g of trihy-
the hepatocytes. To check cell viability and to determine drate potassium ferrocyanide in 125 mL of Sterile Water for
viable cell concentration, dilute a 100-L aliquot of the cell Injection, or use an appropriate commercial source.
suspension with 400 L of Wash buffer and 500 L of iso-

Official from December 1, 2012


Copyright (c) 2012 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
Accessed from 128.83.63.20 by nEwp0rt1 on Tue Jun 05 05:17:06 EDT 2012

5632 123 Glucagon Bioidentity Tests / Biological Tests Second Supplement to USP 35NF 30

System suitability: Analyze the Potassium ferrocyanide solu- the range of concentrations being determined. Determine
tion, the Reference solutions, and an additional five repli- the increase in glucose concentration for each Standard
cates of either the 500- or 1000-mg/L Reference solution in preparation and Assay preparation compared to the aver-
an appropriate glucose analyzer. Prepare a standard curve age value of the Negative control solution.
using the Reference solutions as directed for the Standard Calculations
preparations. The square root of the residual error mean Calculate the relative potency of the Glucagon samples in
square from the regression divided by the average of the USP Units/mL using statistical methods for parallel-line as-
response multiplied by 100% (line %RSD) must be NMT says, comparing the Reference Standard curve (from the
2.0%. In addition, the response of the Potassium ferrocya- Standard preparations) to the Glucagon sample curve (from
nide solution must be NMT 30 mg/L, and the relative stan- the Assay preparations). No doseresponse reversals may
dard deviation must be NMT 2.0% for the replicate analy- occur within a run for the 25-, 50-, or 100-U/mL Standard
ses of the middle Reference solution. preparations and Assay preparations. [NOTEEither the low-
Procedure: Dispense 5 mL of Hepatocyte Preparation into or high-dose level, but not both, may be excluded from
the Incubation flasks in sequence from high glucagon con- the calculation in order to meet linearity requirements.] Be-
centration to low glucagon concentration, alternating the cause a minimum of two valid assays (rats) are required,
Standard preparations with the Assay preparations. Swirl the the estimated potencies are combined using the proce-
flasks in an orbiting water bath at 125 rpm at 35 for ap- dures in Design and Analysis of Biological Assays 111, Com-
proximately 30 min. Following incubation, remove 1.0-mL bination of Independent Assays, and the width, L, of a 95%
aliquots from each Incubation flask, transfer to labeled confidence interval for the estimated logarithm of the rela-
microcentrifuge tubes, and centrifuge at 13,000 rpm for tive potency is calculated. If L is NMT 0.1938, the results
15 s. Place each supernatant fraction in a labeled sampling are valid. If L is >0.1938, additional assays may be per-
tube for a glucose analyzer, and determine the glucose formed and combined until a valid L term results, and the
concentration (mg/L) of each Standard preparation and As- relative potency is then calculated from all valid indepen-
say preparation. Measure the background reading of the dent runs. It meets the requirement of bioidentity if the
Negative control solutions 1 and 2, and calculate the aver- relative potency is NLT 0.80 USP rGlucagon Unit/mg.
age of the two responses.
To conform to the linear range of the instrument being ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
used, analysts may find it necessary to adjust by dilution USP REFERENCE STANDARDS 11
each of the Standard preparations and Assay preparations. USP Dextrose RS
Use a glucose analyzer that has demonstrated appropriate USP rGlucagon RS2S (USP35)
specificity, accuracy, precision, and linear response over

Official from December 1, 2012


Copyright (c) 2012 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.
Accessed from 128.83.63.20 by nEwp0rt1 on Tue Jun 05 05:17:06 EDT 2012

Second Supplement to USP 35NF 30 Chemical Tests / 232 Elemental ImpuritiesLimits 5633

is exceeded using a total arsenic procedure, it may be possi-


Chemical Tests and ble to show via a procedure that quantifies the different
forms that the inorganic form meets the specification.
Assays The mercury limits are based upon the inorganic (2+) oxi-
dation state. The methyl mercury form (most toxic) is rarely
an issue for pharmaceuticals. Thus, the limit was established
assuming the most common (mercuric) inorganic form. Lim-
its for articles that have the potential to contain methyl mer-
cury (e.g., materials derived from fish) are to be provided in
the monograph.

LIMIT TESTS ROUTES OF EXPOSURE


The toxicity of an elemental impurity is related to its ex-
tent of exposure (bioavailability). The extent of exposure has
been determined for each of the elemental impurities of in-
terest for three routes of administration: oral, parenteral,
and inhalational. These limits are based on chronic expo-
sure. The other two routes of administration, mucosal and
topical, are considered to be the same as oral for the pur-
Add the following: pose of this standard, and the PDEs described in Table 1
would apply to these products. [NOTEThe routes of ad-
ministration of drug products are defined in general chapter
232 ELEMENTAL IMPURITIES Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms 1151.]
LIMITS DRUG PRODUCTS
The limits described in the second through fourth col-
umns of Table 1 are the base daily dose PDEs of the elemen-
INTRODUCTION tal impurities of interest for a drug product taken by the
patient according to indicated routes of administration.
This general chapter specifies limits for the amounts of Parenterals with an intended maximum dose of greater than
elemental impurities in drug products. Elemental impurities 10 mL and not more than 100 mL must use the Summation
include catalysts and environmental contaminants that may Option described below.
be present in drug substances, excipients, or drug products.
These impurities may occur naturally, be added intention- Large Volume Parenterals
ally, or be introduced inadvertently (e.g., by interactions
with processing equipment). When elemental impurities are When the daily dose of an injection is greater than 100
known to be present, have been added, or have the poten- mL (large volume parenteral (LVP)), the amount of elemen-
tial for introduction, assurance of compliance to the speci- tal impurities present in the drug product must be con-
fied levels is required. A risk-based control strategy may be trolled through the individual components used to produce
appropriate when analysts determine how to assure compli- the product. The amounts of elemental impurities present
ance with this standard. Due to the ubiquitous nature of As, in each component used in an LVP are less than the values
Cd, Pb, and Hg, they (at the minimum) must be considered included in the fifth column of Table 1.
in the risk-based control strategy. Regardless of the ap-
proach used, compliance with the limits specified is required
for all drug products. Table 1. Elemental Impurities for Drug Products
The limits presented in this chapter do not apply to excip- Paren- Inhala-
ients and drug substances, except where specified in this Oral teral tional LVP
chapter or in the individual monographs. However, elemen- Daily Daily Daily Compo-
tal impurity levels present in drug substances and excipients Dose Dose Dose nent
must be known and reported. PDEa PDE PDE Limit
The limits indicated in this chapter are not required for Element (g/day) (g/day) (g/day) (g/g)
articles intended only for veterinary use and conventional Cadmium 25 2.5 1.5 0.25
vaccines. Dietary supplements and their ingredients are ad- Lead 5 5 5 0.5
dressed in Elemental Contaminants in Dietary Supplements
2232.1 Inorganic
arsenicb 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.15
Inorganic
SPECIATION mercuryb 15 1.5 1.5 0.15
Iridium 100 10 1.5 1.0
The determination of the oxidation state, organic com- Osmium 100 10 1.5 1.0
plex, or combination is termed speciation. Each of the ele- Palladium 100 10 1.5 1.0
mental impurities has the potential to be present in differing
oxidation or complexation states. However, arsenic and Platinum 100 10 1.5 1.0
mercury are of particular concern because of the differing Rhodium 100 10 1.5 1.0
toxicities of their inorganic and complexed organic forms. Ruthenium 100 10 1.5 1.0
The arsenic limits are based on the inorganic (most toxic) Chromium * * 25 *
form. Arsenic can be measured using a total-arsenic proce- Molybdenum 100 10 250 1.0
dure under the assumption that all arsenic contained in the
material under test is in the inorganic form. Where the limit
aPDE = Permissible daily exposure based on a 50-kg person.
b See Speciation section.
1This dietary supplement chapter is still under revision and will appear online * Not a safety concern.
in PF 38(3) [MayJune 2012].

Official from December 1, 2012


Copyright (c) 2012 The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. All rights reserved.

You might also like