Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
a part of 18th century life that all scholars agree was signific-
ant to the upper classes. They begin with the observation that
the original Paca property is two equal adjacent squares, each
198 x 198 feet. The dimensions are a function of an early
18th century survey. Working within this given set of bounds,
they argue that the garden was laid out using a set of 3-4-5
right rectangles and accompanying 3-4-5 right triangles, and
that the edges and sides of these account for and predict the
location of major garden features. The main block of the
house is a 3-4-5 rectangle, which means two 3-4-5 right tri-
angles, and it sits on a larger 3-4-5 rectangle. The smaller
rectangle contains a quarter of the house and a quarter of the
large rectangle which the house sits on and can be multiplied
out evenly over the entire garden. So the original four quar-
ters the house sits on, when flipped out, stretch out to twenty-
four rectangles, covering the entire garden, thus creating a
plan with an equal, even grid over it. The lines in this grid ac-
count for the edges of three terraces, the location of the
central axis in the garden, the location of the major garden
structures, and the major trees in the garden. Further, the
garden area itself is two adjacent 3-4-5 rectangles, each of
which clearly bounds the two distinct areas of the garden. All
this plane geometry is prescribed by 18th century English
Mark P. Leone 10 Historical Archaeology
22.1 (1988): 29-35
the garden is a triangle, with one ramp the short leg of a 3-4-
5 right triangle and one terrace an extension of the front of
the house. He quickly saw that the terraces did not narrow as
they descended, they narrowed as they ascended, meaning
that the view to the house was exaggerated and made the
house appear much greater than it is. Further, the ascending
terraces, marked by long rows of box, all focus the attention
of the visitor arriving by water on the house, which sits as the
focus of the long rows of falls and box. Thus, suddenly using
the grid of rules for plane and solid geometry, the house had
an articulation with the garden and the organization of the
garden made sense. Now we knew something we did not
know before, and our conclusions began to have a redund-
ancy which gave them weight.
The organizational behavior that goes along with these gar-
dens is incompletely known now. Our research is unfinished.
But even so, we know that owners walked their peers
through the gardens, and the visitors admired the plantings
and commented on their own enhanced emotional states:
awe, satisfaction, and calm. We also know that Charles Car-
roll wrote about work to be done in his Annapolis garden
while he was at the Continental Congress. Thus he was
spending money, time, and thought on a garden while he was
Mark P. Leone 21 Historical Archaeology
22.1 (1988): 29-35
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ALTHUSSER. Louis
1981 Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Len-
in and Philosophy, pp. 127-86. Monthly Review
Press, New York.
Mark P. Leone 24 Historical Archaeology
22.1 (1988): 29-35
BINFORD, LEWIS R.
1981 Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths. Academic
Press, New York.
1983 Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, New
York.
1987 Researching Ambiguity: Frames of Reference and
Site Structure. In Method and Theory for Activity
Area Research, edited by Susan Kent, pp. 449-512.
Columbia University Press, New York.
ISSAC, RHYS
1982 The Transformation of Virginia 1740-1790. Univer-
sity of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
LEONE, MARK P.
1984 Interpreting Ideology in Historical Archaeology: Us-
ing the Rules of Perspective in the William Paca
Garden in Annapolis, Maryland. In Ideology, Power,
Mark P. Leone 25 Historical Archaeology
22.1 (1988): 29-35
MARK P. LEONE
DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
COLLEGE PARK, MARYLAND 20742