Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PR
June
O IEW
W
2012
PA
G
E
3
2
I-
1
www.che.com
HOW LONG
WILL IT
MEANWHILE, BACK AT
THE OTHER VESSEL...
TICK TICK TICK...
TA K E ?
PAGE 34
.com
See the full range of fast-payback equipment at flexicon.com: Flexible Screw Conveyors, Pneumatic Conveying Systems, Bulk Bag Unloaders, Bulk Bag Conditioners,
Bulk Bag Fillers, Bag Dump Stations, Drum/Box/Container Dumpers, Weigh Batching and Blending Systems, and Automated Plant-Wide Bulk Handling Systems
2012 Flexicon Corporation. Flexicon Corporation has registrations and pending applications for the trademark FLEXICON throughout the world.
Circle 21 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-21
Proven Process
Solutions for You
CT.39e-1
Circle 51 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-51
WHEN THE HEAT IS ON, PUT THE
THERMINOL PERFORMANCE CREW
Transfer Fluid Performance Crew working for you. From start to finish, the Therminol TLC Total Lifecycle Care team
of seasoned professionals is ready to support you with everything you need to win. For your people, we provide
start-up assistance, operational training and a technical service hotline. For your facility, we offer system design,
quality Therminol products, sample analysis, flush fluid & refill and a fluid trade-in program*. We provide everything
you need to keep your heat transfer system at peak performance throughout its lifecycle. So join the winning team.
In North America call 1-800-426-2463 or in Europe 32.10.48.12.11. Youll see no other heat transfer fluid delivers
more proven comprehensive performance than Therminol.
www.therminol.com
Therminol TLC Total Lifecycle Care is a complete program of products and services from Solutia
designed to keep your heat transfer system in top operating condition through its entire lifecycle.
Solutia Inc. 2011. Therminol , TLC Total Lifecycle Care , Therminol logo, and Solutia and RADIANCE LOGO are trademarks of Solutia Inc.,
registered in the U.S. and in other countries. *Available only in North America.
Circle 48 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-48
JUNE 2012 IN THIS ISSUE VOLUME 119, NO. 6
www.che.com
HOW LONG
WILL IT
COVER STORY MEANWHILE, BACK AT
THE OTHER VESSEL...
TICK TICK TICK...
TA K E ?
34 Cover Story Draining Vessels Deter-
mine how long it will take to drain flat-,
cone- or dish-shaped units
NEWS
AND AT THE THIRD VESSEL? ... ZZZZZZZ...
11 Chementator Convert wastewater and
carbon dioxide into chemicals with this
technology; A non-crop-based sugar feed-
stock for bio-based chemicals and biofuels;
and more
20 Newsbriefs GE and Shenhua open
cleaner-coal-technology JV in China; CSB *ONLY ON CHE.COM
releases new safety video on Dupont hot More on Achema; Explosion
work explosion; Cybersecurity bill to ease Equipment; New Products; Lat-
information sharing passes House; and est news and more
more
22 Newsfront Education Evolution To 66 Engineering Practice A Novel Equa- DEPARTMENTS
prepare students for globalized industries, tion for Isothermal Pipe Flow A newly Letters . . . . . . . . . . . 6
chemical engineering departments are in- derived equation for isothermal gas flow in
Calendar . . . . . . . . 89
corporating new requirements, utilizing IT pipes yields improved mass-flux predictions
Whos Who . . . . . . . 78
and connecting with CPI companies
EQUIPMENT & SERVICES Reader Service . . . . 76
26 Equipment News Roundup Explo- 30 Focus on Software Plant-management Economic
sions: Are You Prepared?* Explosion software for increased integration, and Indicators . . . . . 7980
protection equipment can minimize dam- more; Track equipment health at large op-
age, but process understanding is key to erations; Enhancements for simulation of ADVERTISERS
optimized solutions batch reactors; and more Literature Review . . 69
32D-1 Show Preview Achema 2012 Held Product Showcase. . 73
ENGINEERING once every three years, Achema will take Classified
place June 1822 in Frankfurt, Germany. A Advertising . . . . 7475
33 Facts at Your Fingertips Spray Dry-
small portion of the products that will be ex- Advertiser Index . . . 77
ing Parameters This one-page reference
hibited on the show floor are discussed here
guide outlines the main considerations
involved in spray drying 32I-1 Show Preview II Achema 2012* COMING IN JULY
More of the products and services to be Look for: Feature Re-
42 Feature Report Dynamic Modeling exhibited at Achema are included: Tube-in- ports on Mixing; and
for Steam System Control Dynamic
tube design augments safety in these heat Corrosion; an Engi-
modeling fills in the gaps of steady-state
exchangers; A wear-resistant rotary valve for neering Practice arti-
modeling and provides a more complete,
abrasive bulk solids; and much more cle on Evaluating Green
reliable and efficient analysis
Projects; a You and
48 Engineering Practice Distillation: COMMENTARY Your Job article on
Avoid Problems During Tower 5 Editors Page Achema expected to ex- Working with the CSB
Startup Practical procedures for both ceed previous years results Attendance after an accident; Envi-
effective startup and problem analysis are at the largest exhibition congress for the ronmental Manager
discussed here for a depropanizer that chemical process industries is expected to articles on Guidelines
experienced downcomer seal loss outpace that of the previous (2009) event, for Safe Process Vacuum
which recorded 3,767 exhibitors and over Systems; and Overpres-
60 Engineering Practice CFD Analysis 173,000 visitors sure Protection; News
of Heat Transfer From Flares A way articles on Biogas; and
to obtain conservative estimates for the 72 The Fractionation Column A very con- Catalysts; and more
temperatures at the support structures of fined space This real-life experience reminds
a flare system us of how dangerous confined spaces can be Cover: David Whitcher
us ot
at h #
D
24
,
Make the unpredictable
totally predictable.
Swagelok Pressure Regulators are now an even better choice for all
your pressure regulator needs. Why? Well, alongside our proven experience
and expertise, our range now covers sizes from 1/8 to 4 in. and all your
regulator needs high-flow capability, two-stage, back-pressure and
vaporizing models. With our regulators you get accuracy, sensitivity and
pressure stability. In short total predictability. Exactly what you would expect.
Visit swagelok.com/pressure.
2012 Swagelok Company
Circle 52 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-52
Winner of Eight Jesse H. Neal
Awards for Editorial Excellence
Editors Page
T
EDITORS dwhitcher@che.com
REBEKKAH J. MARSHALL PRODUCTION (CPI) and the globe will gather together for the 30th time at Achema,
Editor in Chief the worlds largest exhibition congress on chemical engineering, envi-
rmarshall@che.com
STEVE OLSON
Director of Production & ronmental protection and biotechnology (June 1822; Frankfurt am Main,
DOROTHY LOZOWSKI Manufacturing
Managing Editor solson@accessintel.com Germany). Organizers at Dechema e.V. (Frankfurt; www.dechema.de) are
dlozowski@che.com
GERALD ONDREY (Frankfurt) JOHN BLAYLOCK-COOKE optimistic that the attendance and exhibitor totals will outpace those of
Senior Editor Ad Production Manager the previous (2009) event, which recorded a total of 3,767 exhibitors and
gondrey@che.com jcooke@accessintel.com
SCOTT JENKINS
over 173,000 visitors.
Associate Editor AUDIENCE Held once every three years, Achema is an event truly like no other.
sjenkins@che.com DEVELOPMENT
Starting several months before the event itself, Achema begins to take
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
SARAH GARWOOD
Audience Marketing Director center stage on the schedule of every Chemical Engineering editor. The
SUZANNE A. SHELLEY sgarwood@accessintel.com first reason reflects the sheer number and impact of innovative technolo-
sshelley@che.com
CHARLES BUTCHER (U.K.)
GEORGE SEVERINE gies that are unveiled there. Examples of these technologies are scattered
Fulfillment Manager
cbutcher@che.com gseverine@accessintel.com throughout this issue, including our Chementator department (starting
PAUL S. GRAD (Australia) JEN FELLING on p. 11), our Focus on Software (pp. 3031) and the second installment of
pgrad@che.com
List Sales, Statlistics (203) 778-8700 our Achema Preview, which begins on p. 32 (and continues on our website
TETSUO SATOH (Japan) j.felling@statlistics.com
tsatoh@che.com at www.che.com/new_products_and_services/). The second reason drawing
JOY LEPREE (New Jersey) EDITORIAL our attention stems from over 900 lectures in the conference lineup that
jlepree@che.com ADVISORY BOARD
provide a fruitful ground for good technical manuscripts that we are al-
GERALD PARKINSON JOHN CARSON
(California) gparkinson@che.com Jenike & Johanson, Inc. ways seeking for the magazine.
INFORMATION SERVICES DAVID DICKEY The pinnacle, however, of a Chemical Engineering editors preoccupation
CHARLES SANDS MixTech, Inc. with Achema is in our production of the Achema Daily, a 64-page newspa-
Senior Developer per that is produced onsite every day of the show. Even with so many pages
MUKESH DOBLE
Web/business Applications Architect
IIT Madras, India
csands@accessintel.com to fill, we are only able to hit the highlights. Consider for a moment that if
MARKETING HENRY KISTER a person spent eight hours from Monday to Friday touring only the exhibit
Fluor Corp.
JAMIE REESBY halls and ignoring conference sessions, meals, walking time and interac-
Marketing Director TREVOR KLETZ
TradeFair Group, Inc. Loughborough University, U.K.
tion with other attendees, he or she would have less than 40 seconds to
jreesby@che.com spend at each exhibitor booth.
GERHARD KREYSA (retired)
JENNIFER BRADY DECHEMA e.V. The typical booth visit, of course, is much longer than that. Visitors
Marketing Coordinator
TradeFair Group, Inc. RAM RAMACHANDRAN come to have meaningful discussions with suppliers, often getting into
jbrady@che.com (Retired) The Linde Group the specification stages. After all, Achema has proven its ability to provide
HEADQUARTERS virtually every type of technology needed to build, operate and maintain
88 Pine Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10005, U.S. a chemical process plant, from suppliers across the globe. And, Thomas
Tel: 212-621-4900 Fax: 212-621-4694
Scheuring, CEO of Dechema, says With a proportion of around 50% of ex-
EUROPEAN EDITORIAL OFFICES
Zeilweg 44, D-60439 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
hibitors from abroad, Achema 2012 will be even more international than
Tel: 49-69-9573-8296 Fax: 49-69-5700-2484 all of its predecessors.
CIRCULATION REQUESTS: Of all the Achema exhibition groups, Scheuring says that two particu-
Tel: 847-564-9290 Fax: 847-564-9453 larly stand out: Instrumentation, Control and Automation Techniques
Fullfillment Manager; P.O. Box 3588,
Northbrook, IL 60065-3588 email: clientservices@che.com and Pharmaceutical, Packaging and Storage Techniques have achieved
ADVERTISING REQUESTS: see p. 76 impressive growth rates. Due to the completion of a new hall at the Frank-
For photocopy or reuse requests: 800-772-3350 or info@copyright.com furt Messe, Achema was able to offer both of these exhibition groups more
For reprints: Wrights Media, 1-877-652-5295, sales@wrightsmedia.com
scope for expansion, which he says was promptly snapped up. He adds
ACCESS INTELLIGENCE, LLC that demand in the two largest exhibition groups, Pumps, Compressors,
DON PAZOUR ROBERT PACIOREK Valves and Fittings and Laboratory and Analytical
Chief Executive Officer Senior Vice President,
ED PINEDO
Chief Information Officer Techniques, also remains gratifyingly stable. In fact,
Executive Vice President SYLVIA SIERRA the record total of 996 exhibitors (and growing) makes
& Chief Financial Officer Senior Vice President,
MACY L. FECTO
Corporate Audience Development Achema the largest pump exhibition in the world.
Exec. Vice President, MICHAEL KRAUS For those of you who cannot make it to Achema this
Human Resources & Administration Vice President,
HEATHER FARLEY
Production and Manufacturing time, we will be offering the Achema Daily in a digital
Divisional President, STEVE BARBER format. Meanwhile, our July and August issues will cer-
Access Intelligence Vice President,
Financial Planning and Internal Audit tainly contain more of the groundbreaking news that we
GERALD STASKO find there.
Vice President/Corporate Controller
Rebekkah Marshall
4 Choke Cherry Road, Second Floor
Rockville, MD 20850 www.accessintel.com CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 5
Letters
Postscripts, corrections
www.outotec.com May 2012 (p. 14), Chementator: In the article, A new cata-
lyst enables room-temperature interconversion of CO2 and
formic acid, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) was
referred to as Brookhaven National Institute. The corrected,
Circle 40 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-40 online version of the article can be found at www.che.com.
6 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Efficient Plant Management
COMOS Software Solutions
www.siemens.com/comos
Circle 47 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-47
Chemical Engineering e 1.2 Messe 86x123 2012
perfect
Calendar
ACHEMA
Frankfurt/Main
For
from 18.06.-22.06.2012
Hall 3.1 / Stand A75 NORTH AMERICA
methods
production
Semicon West. SEMI (San Jose, Calif.). Phone: 408-943-
6945; Web: semiconwest.org
San Francisco, Calif. July 1012
EUROPE
The Scaleup of Chemical Processes. Scientific Visit us!
Update (East Sussex, U.K.). Phone: +44-1435-873062; ACHEMA, Frankfurt am Main
Web: scientificupdate.co.uk 18 22 June 2012
Milan, Italy July 912 Hall 3.0, Booth #F50
SOME THINK
3rd International Conference on Metal-
Organic Frameworks and Open Framework
Compounds (MOF2012). Dechema e.V. (Frankfurt
YOU CAN
am Main, Germany). Phone: +49-69-7564-277; Web:
mof-conf.org
Edinburgh, U.K. September 1619
SPECIALIST
PPMA Show 2012. Reed Exhibitions (Surrey, U.K.).
Phone: +44-20-8910-7189; Web: ppmashow.co.uk
Birmingham, U.K. September 2527
DIFFERENT.
Lisbon, Portugal September 2627
of conidence?
EXPERIENCE MATTERS W
O I
C ORION INSTRUMENTS
CHEMICAL P M W
O G E P R P P
B
M L MLI
T
REVEAL
S
S R MLI
G W
S
REVEAL
O V B B R L ORION
HART HART C F FOUNDATION F F Circle 39 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-39
ISO 9001
Edited by Gerald Ondrey June 2012
Electrochemical reactor
CO2 Capture and Conversion
Convert wastewater and CO2 into e-
DC electricity
e-
Cashco, Inc.
P.O. Box 6, Ellsworth, KS 67439-0006
Ph. (785) 472-4461, Fax: (785) 472-3539
Circle 11 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-11
12 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Focusing on your safety
We offer peace of mind when it comes to your process safety and
productivity. Metso is a single source for all your process control needs,
from automation systems to intelligent flow control solutions that are
proven in the toughest conditions. Our 30,000 professionals based in
over 50 countries deliver sustainability and profitability to customers
worldwide.
www.metso.com/oilandgas
Circle 36 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-36
C HEMENTATO R
1-866-758-6004 WWW.FIKE.COM
Circle 20 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-20
14 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Heat-harvesting
A significant portion of generated energy is wasted as heat.
Strategically
Thermoelectric materials convert waste heat to electric-
ity, and could improve energy efficiency, but most existing Adapting
thermoelectric materials are expensive to manufacture and
difficult to install. Researchers at Purdue University (West
Lafayette, Ind.; www.purdue.edu) have collaborated with a
team at Jilin University (Changchun, China) in developing
a solution-phase deposition method for coating nanoscale
crystals of lead-tellurium (a thermoelectric material) onto
glass fibers. The techniques used in producing the flexible
coated fibers could point the way toward energy harvesting
materials that require less raw material and are amenable to
large-scale manufacture.
Engineering advanced
2012 Chemstations, Inc. All rights reserved. | CMS-322-1 6/12
Circle 12 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-12
C HEMENTATO R
An eye forfromdetail...
(Continued p. 15)
Aramid nanofibers
Teijin Techno Products Ltd., a Teijin group company (Tokyo,
Japan; www.teijin.co.jp) has developed the worlds irst
mass-producible aramid nanoiber. These uniformly sized
nanoibers are based on the companys proprietary Teijin-
conex heat-resistant meta-aramid, and will be marketed in
the form of non-woven sheets. Commercial production is
targeted for 2014.
These heat-resistant, aramid nanoiber sheets are said
to maintain their shape, even at 300C; are highly resistant
to oxidation; and have a high porosity and large surface
properties that make them especially suited for use as
separators in lithium ion batteries. Other potential applica-
Steel belts for
tions are being developed for the new aramid sheets, in-
cluding separators for capacitors and heat-resistant ilters.
challenging environments!
Visible photocatalyst
T he research groups of Masahiro Miyauchi at Tokyo In-
stitute of Technology (www.eim.ceram.titech.ac.jp) and
Kazuhiko Hashimoto at the University of Tokyo (www.
light.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp) have developed a photocatalyst that
ACHEMA For the handling of liquid is highly active for the destruction of volatile organic com-
hall 8, booth F4 media: poiunds (VOCs) using visible radiation. The catalyst, a
Large range of valve types
culmination of a five-year project supported by New En-
ergy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
Numerous body and seal (NEDO), opens the door for applications for photocatalyti-
materials cally destroying harmful VOCs in interiors of buildings and
PVC U ABS PP PVDF NBR cars with visible light.
FPM EPDM PTFE The researchers converted photochemically inactive, ox-
Various actuator and connection ygen-defective TiO2 made by the thermal-oxidation of a
www gemu-group com versions mixture of Ti2O3 and TiO2 in air into an efficient visible-
light-sensitive photocatalyst by grafting the TiO2 surface
Circle 25 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-25
18 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
(Continued from p. 15)
C HEMENTATO R
Green polymer
In cooperation with project partners from BASF, the Technical
University of Munich and the University of Hamburg, scientists
from Siemens global research unit Corporate Technology
have developed a competitive alternative to the standard ABS
(acrylonitrite-butadiene-styrene) polymer, which is frequently
used in consumer products. The new composite material is
a mixture containing polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), which is
made from renewable materials such as palm oil and starch.
Because PHB is brittle, polypropylene carbonate (PPC) from
BASF is added to make it softer. PPC is 43 wt.% CO2, which
is obtained from power plant emissions using a separation
process. More than 70% of the new mixture is made of green
polymers. Bosch-Siemens-Hausgerte (BSH) has used the
new material for vacuum cleaner covers under series produc-
tion process conditions.
EDUCATION
EVOLUTION engineering research was funded by
To prepare students for globalized industry, notes Dan Crowl, the Her-
bert Dow Professor for Chemical
industries, chemical engineering academic Process Safety at Michigan Technical
departments are incorporating new requirements, University (MTU; Houghton, Mich.;
www.mtu.edu). Whereas today that is
utilizing IT and connecting with CPI companies not the case. The modern relationship
between the academic and industrial
chemical engineering communities is
A
host of conditions, including glo- that generally, computer software and more diverse, dynamic and complex
balization of industry, expand- information management tools are than in the past, but there is a general
ing access to information and a keeping pace. For example, the use of sense that the academic and industrial
shifting workforce profile pres- computer-assisted design in engineer- chemical engineering worlds are not as
ent challenges for university chemi- ing is rising, he says. integrated as they should be.
cal engineering departments as they In education, access to information The disconnect between academia
prepare aspiring engineers for work. has never been greater, says Uni- and industry in chemical engineer-
To address the challenges, the educa- versity of Michigan (UM) chemical ing has never been greater, says
tional system for chemical engineering engineering collegiate lecturer Susan Sanat Kumar, chair of the chemical
is trying to strike the optimal balance Montgomery. This has both positives engineering department at Columbia
between new and traditional teach- and negatives for students. The wealth University (New York; www.columbia.
ing approaches, as well as between of online information allows unprece- edu). Its increasingly polarized.
core chemical engineering topics and dented access to the wide range of the Crowl suggests that an overall trend
modern engineering applications. latest technical information and ideas, within academia over the past several
Meanwhile, the academic chemical but also sources of temptation for stu- decades has been a generally reduced
engineering community and the world dents to take shortcuts. level of direct industry experience
of industrial chemicals are struggling, While most of the core topics taught on the part of the faculty members.
with mixed success, to forge connec- in chemical engineering courses have Theres been a drift away from the in-
tions and relationships. remained the same over several de- dustrial experience in U.S. education,
cades, the methods for teaching those he says.
Macro-level trends topics have changed somewhat, pri- There is a rising awareness, however,
A number of wider trends are having a marily through the wider use of in- that university departments must be
significant impact in shaping the edu- formation technology (IT). The use of connected more to industry, and must
cation enterprise in chemical engineer- information technology for teaching continuously foster those relationships,
ing. Information and the technology chemical engineering has been uni- say Mauricio Futran and Henrik Ped-
used to locate and organize it is at versal, but I still dont think universi- ersen, the current and past depart-
the heart of several high-level trends ties are taking full advantage of the IT ment chairs, respectively, of the chemi-
that have both positive and negative tools available, opines Richard Felder, cal engineering department at Rutgers
consequences for the education of engi- emeritus professor of chemical engi- University (Piscataway, N.J.; www.
neers. There has been a veritable ex- neering at North Carolina State Uni- rutgers.edu). Rutgers is somewhat
plosion of technical information avail- versity (NCSU; Raleigh; www.ncsu. unique in the number and breadth of
able, says Sasha Gurke, senior vice edu/effective_teaching) and longtime the industry partnerships that the de-
president and co-founder of Knovel, an champion of improved teaching. partment has made, Pedersen added.
online library of curated technical con- These include a catalysis consortium,
tent. And the growth of information is Bridging the gap a center for solid-organic particulate
still accelerating, while the Internet is In decades past, university chemi- matter, individual research collabora-
maturing, he adds. One result of that cal engineering programs have been tions and others. The partnerships are
is an ever-greater need for efficient closely tied to industrial chemical- driven by the expertise of the faculty,
and effective informatics tools for min- processing operations in their regions. which tends to be in areas of interest to
ing that information. Gurke suggests A large portion of academic chemical industry companies, Futran says.
22 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
In an example of how connections that the industry-academic gap is nel transferring practical engineer-
are made, many departments have real, despite the efforts on the part of ing knowledge on a person-to-person
established industry advisory boards individual universities, individual re- basis. Now, streamlined staffing and
that meet periodically to provide searchers and companies to establish the retirements of Baby-Boom-aged
input to university departments about links between the two sectors. Rela- engineers leave fewer opportunities
industrial needs, and other topics, tionships between universities and for in-depth mentoring. Citing an
MTUs Crowl points out. engineering-related companies cer- IEEE study that suggests over three-
Academics have to go out and seek tainly exist, but they are established quarters of the knowledge obtained by
connections to industry, because there and cultivated somewhat on an ad hoc engineers is acquired after graduation,
are not many good forums for the two basis. There is no national policy or Gurke says the reality is that young en-
communities to come together, Colum- leadership in this matter, he says. gineers have to obtain that knowledge
bias Kumar says. He recounts a recent Universities can and should do in other ways. And the relationships
effort to set up an industry-academic more to integrate practical industry between CPI players and engineering
discussion group at the New York Acad- knowledge into their courses, such schools will play a large role in how ef-
emy of Sciences in which academic as by setting up business incubators, fectively this is accomplished.
participation was far higher than in- participating in industrial R&D and University chemical engineering
dustry, by a 90/10% split, Kumar says. expanding internship programs with programs are exploring a wide range
So far, it seems like the themes we local companies, Gurke comments. of ways to foster improved connections
have picked bioprocessing, energy, The disconnect between academia with industry. An overriding educa-
big data have not resonated that and industry amplifies existing work- tional goal in the chemical engineering
strongly with industry, he says. force-related challenges. Gurke ex- program at MTU is to give students as
Knovels Gurke agrees that broader plains, The problem is that, in the much fundamental depth as possible,
leadership and coordination for aca- past, mentoring of young engineers while still relating the education to
demic-industry initiatives in chemical by older, experienced ones was more industrial practice, says MTUs Crowl.
engineering is lacking. He also agrees prominent, with experienced person- For example, in many cases, universi-
Visit us at ACHEMA
in Frankfurt, Germany
18 22 June 2012
Hall 4.0, Booth C26
Safer
Extended temperature and
pressure ratings
Simplified grounding
W how students learn, universities have an array of tools with which to engage their
young engineers. Students want an active learning environment, says MTUs Crowl.
Former N.C. State professor Felder cites the increasing use of inductive learning techniques,
universities have moved to- such as inquiry-based and problem-based learning, in which students are first presented with a
ward smaller unit operations challenge and learn the course material in the context of addressing that challenge, as an ex-
laboratory equipment that is ample of the disciplines movement toward more experiential hands-on instructional strategies.
Also, making expectations clear to students about what problems they are expected to solve
not as reflective of industrial
is important. Going forward, there will be an increasing use of learning objectives, where
environments, says Crowl. On instructors articulate what skills should be mastered at different points in the class.
the other hand, MTU students For the past 21 years, Felder has led a popular, three-day workshop for chemical engineer-
work on a pilot-scale, three- ing instructors known as the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI).
story distillation tower with The successful workshops have exposed more than 1,000 chemical engineering instructors
an Emerson control system. from over 200 institutions to the latest information from the cognitive science field about how
Its an example of how were students learn. NETI is also designed to provide instructors with new tools to foster that learn-
trying to make the academic ing, Felder says.
experience connect to the in- The chemical engineering department at Manhattan College has utilized a large number
dustrial world, Crowl noted. of teaching tools and techniques, but has found that its students responded better to a more
traditional lecture-based approach.
Other faculty members, such
One thing I think departments need to be careful of is changing things just for the sake
as UMs Montgomery and Ann of change, says Annmarie Flynn, chemical engineering department chair at Manhattan
Marie Flynn, chemical engi- College. Its important to establish a balance between the traditional teaching style and
neering department chair at the more experiential, inductive approaches, which are challenging to run effectively in
Manhattan College (Riverdale, practice, Flynn remarks. Formal lecture, with repetition of concepts, remains important,
New York; www.manhattan. Columbias Kumar adds.
edu Flynn say that it is impor- The chemical engineering department at Rutgers strives to teach fundamental topics in a
tant to have faculty with in- classroom setting, while still using Web-based tools that are available.
dustrial experience, especially
to teach the product- and pro-
cess-design courses. that a survey of chemical engineering Ancillary skills
alumni at UM identified a number of Despite the difficulty in fitting mate-
Curriculum changes topics where recent graduates were rial into the traditional chemical engi-
A major ongoing challenge faced by somewhat lacking in their preparation neering curriculum, departments are
university chemical engineering fac- for the workplace. These included sta- still making an effort to provide their
ulty is how to maintain the core chem- tistics, six-sigma manufacturing and students with not only technical engi-
ical-engineering curriculum, while also process equipment troubleshooting. neering knowledge, but also skills that
including key ancillary skills and intro- Weve been hearing a lot from indus- are not specific to engineering, and yet
ducing students to new technologies. trial engineers that critical thinking important for modern workplace suc-
Theres a deep-seeded conservatism skills are important, especially when cess. These include writing, presenta-
in the world of chemical engineering, applied to troubleshooting processes tion, language and others.
which means that there is a consid- and equipment problems, says UMs Communications-related skills have
erable resistance to change, Kumar Montgomery. In response to the input emerged as a focus in many engineer-
says. Its actually quite remarkable from alumni in industry positions, UM ing departments. At the University of
that so little has changed in the chem- developed in conjunction with the Michigan, members of the technical
ical engineering curriculum. alumni board a required one-credit communications faculty are also in-
In most ways, the curriculum has class covering chemical engineering volved in the laboratory and design
remained very much the same; what process economics. courses in the chemical engineering
may be different are the examples Others pointed to additional areas department, notes Montgomery.
used to illustrate the topics, Kumar that should be addressed more in Students at Manhattan College are
says. Its these examples that will chemical engineering education. For required to take a communications
bring in some of the newest technolo- example, sustainability and risk anal- class, in which they discuss topics
gies and latest applications and be ysis are becoming more important in such as technical presentations, email
reflective of modern technologies. framing engineering problems. Risk writing, technical communications
Futran and Pedersen, of Rutgers Uni- management and risk analysis are and others, Flynn explains.
versity agree, saying the core chemical important for engineering design, and At Columbia, Kumar notes that
engineering topics remain the same should become more prominent in en- communications skills are integrated
after decades of teaching. The problem gineering education, says Gurke. across the board in the undergradu-
is that there is very little, if any, room Reflecting the importance of comput- ate curriculum, so chemical engineer-
in the curriculum for new topics, Crowl ing and informatics, Columbia chemi- ing students are required to deliver
says. Its very difficult to fit everything cal engineering students are required multiple oral presentations and sub-
in, adds Manhattans Flynn. to complete a class in programming mit several written reports. Rutgers
Despite the difficulty, chemical engi- methods. In addition, they must com- takes a similar approach.
neering departments are feeling pres- plete a two-semester chemical engi- Aside from communication skills,
sure to add more material to their cur- neering design series, where product other non-engineering-specific topics
ricula. For example, Montgomery says design is the second-semester subject. have also emerged as ones that will
24 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
help engineering students in their ca- chemical hazards education. The ad- chemical engineering departments in
reers. For example, all Columbia engi- ditions are a result of new accredi- the U.S. Universities are addressing
neering students are also required to tation requirements introduced in this need in a number of ways.
take a core program of general edu- 2012 by the Accreditation Board for Most university departments are in-
cation requirements. Engineering and Technology (ABET; corporating process safety and chemi-
At Michigan, we try to give students Baltimore, Md.; www.abet.org) to in- cal hazard information in the context
more opportunities to take general clude teaching on chemical process of other classes. At Rutgers, we have
electives and pursue minors in their safety and process hazards as part of embedded that material into multiple
degree program. Theres also a uni- all university chemical engineering courses, Pedersen says.
versity-wide initiative in international curricula. At Manhattan, Flynn says the de-
education, Montgomery points out. One of the factors that led to the partment has incorporated in its labo-
Knovels Gurke also recommends a new ABET chemical hazards ac- ratories a number of safety features
more comprehensive approach to teach- creditation requirements was the instituted at an industrial cosmetics
ing informatics in university engineer- U.S. Chemical Safety Boards (CSB; engineering facility at Loreal Corp.,
ing courses even suggesting man- Washington, D.C.; www.csb.gov) inves- with which they have a relationship.
datory informatics classes. Everyone tigation of a 2007 explosion at the T2 It helps to establish a culture of
has visits by a university librarian to Laboratories facility in Jacksonville, safety among the students, she says.
explain resources, but more emphasis Fla. The CSB investigation concluded They are also looking at an accident
should be placed on how to learn and that one of the causes of the accident and emergency management class.
how to do it efficiently, Gurke says. was that engineers did not have suffi- At MTU, Crowl says the depart-
cient instruction on reactive chemical ment has established a student-run
Process hazards requirement hazards. One of the CSBs recommen- safety program in laboratories there
Another area in which additions to dations was to change the accredita- that helps students take responsibil-
the chemical engineering curriculum tion requirements to add education on ity for safety.
have been made is process safety and process hazards to the curriculum of Scott Jenkins
HEXOLOYSILICONCARBIDE
The Name No other company in the world has more expertise with silicon carbide than
That Makes Saint-Gobain Ceramics. Our Hexoloy sintered alpha silicon carbide is the
material of choice for high performance applications in a variety of chemical
A World processing industries throughout the worldwide market. Hexoloy compo-
Of Difference nents are custom made and offer excellent performance at temperatures
up to 1650C (3000F), universal corrosion resistance, excellent wear
resistance, high strength, and high thermal conductivity. Wherever
youre located in the global market, specify Hexoloy silicon carbide, the
name that delivers performance you can count on.
Circle 44 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-44
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 25
Fike
EXPLOSIONS:
ARE YOU PREPARED?
Explosion protection
equipment can
minimize damage,
but process
understanding is
key to optimized
solutions
Fike
A
n explosion is defined as a Designed for use with square or rect-
rapid increase in volume and angular explosion vents, FlamQuench
SQ technology consists of various lay-
release of energy in an extreme ers of high temperature stainless steel
manner, and is usually ac- that absorb heat produced during
companied by high temperature gen- combustion. This allows conventional
eration and gas release. Flammable venting to be done indoors with no
gases, vapors, dusts and ambient release of flame
oxygen all present in chemical pro- An ECARO-25 (photo, top right) clean
cessing facilities can react to cause agent fire-suppression system is suit-
an explosion that essentially creates able for protecting electronics and
a shock wave. high-value assets, thus reducing the
threat of needless downtime and busi-
As a result of modern production ness interruption Pepperl+Fuchs
technologies and increased produc-
tion capacity, an explosion is a threat (Princeton, N.J.; www.chilworth.com).
chemical processors confront daily, When it comes to explosion protec- For industrial signal transmission many
users insist on single loop integrity.
says Gerd Mayer, president of Rembe tion, what youre saying is that you Others need compact mounting. With a
(Charlotte, N.C.; www.rembe.com). are anticipating that an explosion will module width of only 12.5 mm and single
While there are Occupational Safety occur, but you have designed your pro- channel functionality, the new KC-Mod-
and Health Admin. (OSHA; Washing- cesses and equipment in such a way ules of the K-System combine these two
requirements, making them suitable for
ton, D.C.; www.osha.gov) standards that when an explosion does occur, use in hazardous areas
and industry guidelines namely people wont be harmed and the facil-
OSHAs Combustible Dust National ity wont be damaged.
Emphasis Program and NFPAs 654, And, he continues, in order to do of ignition of the flammable gas, vapor
68 and 69 chemical processors are this, operators need to have a clear or dust cloud atmosphere is impera-
still often confused when it comes to understanding of their operations and tive, he says.
selecting and installing explosion pro- processes, as well as the chemicals In addition, the objectives of the fa-
tection systems. being used and the associated risks cility owners must be evaluated, says
Protection is very different than they create. Knowledge of the maxi- Bruce McLelland, national accounts
prevention, explains Vahid Ebadat, mum pressure and the severity of the sales manager for explosion protec-
CEO of Chilworth North America explosion that could occur as a result tion with Fike Corp. (Blue Springs,
26 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
ACHEMA 2012
18.-22. June, Hall 4.0
Booth A68
Mo.; www.fike.com), such as how much injected into the dust or vapor cloud to
Fatty Acid
damage is tolerable and what kind of quench and stop an explosion. While Industry
changes the facility owner is willing to this is a viable solution, it can be an ex-
make for protection. Is it acceptable pensive option because detectors and
if, at the end of an event, a vent has sensors, control systems and battery
worked properly and protected against backup equipment are required and
the worst case scenario, but the pro- must be regularly maintained.
cessing equipment is destroyed by fire Explosion relief venting. Compared
after the explosion? he asks. Its good to the first two options, venting is usu-
that there wasnt flying debris or inju- ally the simplest solution. It consists
ries or loss of facility, but there is still of a panel or door that will rupture
a loss of equipment and there will be or open and release the explosion
a significant loss in process downtime. products (pressure and flame). The
Processors need to look at all types of problem here, however, is that vents
available explosion protection equip- cant normally open inside a building
ment and determine what is accept- and must be routed to a safe location
able loss to them. outside the building, which requires
Mayer agrees. He suggests consid- proximity to an outside wall. And, it is
ering three basic requirements when not an option when the chemical being
selecting a solution: profitability (the released could cause an environmen-
protection solution has to be economi- tal hazard.
cal to implement, operate and main- There have been some advances in
tain), reliability (the protected facility explosion protection solutions, includ-
has to remain permanently and opti- ing suppression systems that offer
mally available for production) and optical detection to improve the speed
safety (people and machines must be of response and stability of detection,
ensured of an explosion-protected en- and indoor venting systems, referred
vironment through constructive and to as particulate retention and flame-
s
Liquid
effective directives). arresting devices, that, under some
circumstances, make venting possible
to m
Equipment types when equipment has no easy access
In addition to the use of appropriately to an outside wall. And, these can all
rated electrical equipment and intrin- be used in conjunction with intrinsi-
sically safe instruments and devices in cally safe instrumentation, the use
hazardous areas, there are three main of which helps reduce but not al-
types of explosion protection solutions, ways eliminate the need for explo- for example:
each with its own set of pros and cons. sion protection equipment in some
Solutions include the following: installations, says Robert Schosker, Tall oil distillation
Containment. Process equipment product manager of intrinsic safety
Lecithin drying
can be designed to withstand the with Pepperl+Fuchs Inc. (Twinsburg,
maximum explosion pressure. How- Ohio; www.pepperl-fuchs.us). Monoglyceride
ever, containment can be an expensive However, experts agree that what Glycerin recovery
option because of the special engi- might seem like the best solution may
neering and strength required. Often, not actually provide the best protec-
once the equipment is built, access to tion for a given facility. It is highly
the vessel for routine maintenance is recommended that chemical proces-
cumbersome. And, it is necessary to sors seek a risk assessment that can
maintain the pressure integrity of classify the hazardous areas, deter-
the vessel for life. Corrosion or other mine the risks and, based upon that
wear and tear can weaken the equip- information, select the explosion pro-
ment over time. In practice, this op- tection solution or solutions that will system solutions
tion is usually considered for small protect employees, equipment and for evaporation and biopharma
vessels or where highly toxic chemi- processes in accordance with the fa-
Processing Partners:
cals must not be released. cility owners objectives.
Explosion suppression. Like a fast- Ultimately, the best solution is www.gigkarasek.at
acting fire extinguisher, suppression the one that provides life safety and www.incontech.com
systems kick in when an explosion enables the facility to maintain their
starts to develop. When explosion con- business with the least interruption
ditions are detected, a suppressant is possible, says McLelland. Circle 26 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-26
EXPLOSION-
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Yokogawa
Install these lights in
hazardous environments
The portable tower and re-
movable lamp assembly de-
sign of the EPL-QP-1X150-100
explosion-proof halogen light tower
(photo) provides 1,500 ft2 of work
area coverage with 1,520 lumens of
light output. It is designed to pro-
vide operators in hazardous
locations with a pow-
erful portable light- Newson Gale
Safe
Solutions For Handling
Dangerous
Chemicals.
ACHEMA
June 18th - 22nd, 2012
Volkmann
. Frankfurt, Germany
l ows
tery backup, a monitoring module in- F
dicating system status/drive external tion
va
relays, a unitized sensor to detect ex-
In no
plosion onset and suppression cannons
e re
that deliver a safe sodium bicarbonate Wh
suppression agent into the protected
equipment. The cannons compact size
and low mass simplify installation
and allow the unit to be installed at
any angle. There is no need for heavy
extension piping and nozzles for sup-
pressant dispersion. BS&B Safety
Systems, Tulsa, Okla
www.bsbsystems.com
FOCUS ON
Software
Plant-management software for
increased integration, and more
This company has expanded its Comos
software solution for plant engineer-
ing and operation to include consider-
ably enhanced functionality. Comos 10
now provides an enterprise platform
for plant engineers and operators that
can handle even the largest volumes
of data. New functions allow project Siemens Industry Sector
teams to collaborate with each other
across different systems and locations,
enabling parallel processing of differ-
ent work packages. Comos 10 also al-
lows further integration of Comos in
the Simatic PCS 7 process-control sys-
tem (photo). A new interface ensures
a consistent, bidirectional exchange
of information between both systems,
which allows previously serial engi-
neering processes to be organized in
parallel. Initial pilot projects have
produced time savings of up to 11
weeks (or 12.5%), and up to 315 fewer
person-weeks. Cosmos 10 is being
released in several stages, the first
version became available last month.
Achema Hall 11.0, Stand C3 Sie-
ProSim
mens Industry Sector, Industry Auto-
mation Div., Nuremberg, Germany Track equipment health Enhancements for simulation
www.siemens.com at large operations of batch reactors
In February, this company intro- Released earlier this year, this new
Major updates of gSolids for duced Proficy SmartSignal Shield version of BatchReactor (photo)
process design and operation 4.0 software for the oil-and-gas and combines detailed equipment mod-
Last month saw the release of gSolids, power industries. The Shield soft- eling, reaction engineering and ad-
a second-generation, integrated drag- ware helps operators detect equip- vanced numerical methods to create
and-drop graphical flowsheet environ- ment problems early and avoid a state-of-the-art simulation envi-
ment for model-based engineering and surprise equipment failure, thereby ronment for chemists and chemical
optimization of solids processes. New in increasing productivity while mini- engineers. By providing a complete
gSolids is the ability to handle multiple mizing costs. This software solution understanding of the production
solid phases, each with its own parti- provides early warning of impend- recipe, the new simulation software
cle-size distribution. There are also en- ing equipment problems, diagnostic enables users from the pharmaceuti-
hancements to a large number of the guidance and prioritized actionable cal and fine-chemicals industries to
softwares capabilities, such as the use intelligence. The Shield softwares test alternative synthesis routes and
of dynamic modeling to handle batch, diagnostic algorithms combine ob- new production strategies through
continuous and hybrid processes; ad- servations on multiple individual effective use of simulation in paral-
vanced parameter estimation and op- sensors to pinpoint failure effects. lel with laboratory and pilot-plant
timization capabilities; and integration Beyond vibration and thermal anal- experiments. The software features
with the companys gCrystal modeling ysis, the solution uniquely models an efficient thermodynamic package
software and gas-liquid process models. all data on all critical rotating and and relies on proven and efficient
Hall 9.2, Stand C9 Process Systems non-rotating equipment. GE Intel- numerical methods. Hall 9.1, Stand
Enterprise Ltd., London, U.K. ligent Platforms, Chicago, Ill. E66a ProSim, Toulouse, France
www.psenterprise.com www.ge-ip.com/smartsignal www.prosim.net
30 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 Note: For more information, circle the 3-digit number
on p. 76, or use the website designation.
Save man-hours with this lation to a wider range of new users, heat exchanger thermal and mechani-
electrical-design software says the company. Users can now ex- cal design products, says the company.
This completely new Electrical soft- perience a fully integrated simulation Process engineers can also jump-start
ware application is said to be a fea- environment to easily access other as- projects and optimize operations by
ture-rich design solution for electrical penONE Engineering products. This efficiently finding and accessing mod-
engineers and designers in the plant enables easy and intuitive access to els and data throughout the Aspen
environment. Pre-released customer the comprehensive physical-proper- Search tool. Aspen Technology, Inc.,
testing has demonstrated man-hour ties database, the capital-cost estimat- Burlington, Mass.
savings of up to 30% when compared ing product and the most-complete www.aspentech.com
to traditional design applications,
says the company. It is quick and easy
to deploy, and has a very open inter-
face, allowing it to be used with design
applications from other vendors or as
part of this companys Integrated En-
gineering & Design approach. Electri-
cal can be used on both new projects,
as well as on brownfield activities
where the integration legacy data is
critical. Hall 9.2, Stand C29 Aveva,
free zone
Solutions Ltd., Cambridge, U.K
www.aveva.com
Circle 33 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-33
Focus
A tool to test for used by this foundation to verify and ancillary files needed to facilitate
HART compliance validate compliance of host products HART DDL/EDDL host testing. Hall
In April, the new enhanced HART submitted for HART registration. 11.V, Stand B29 HART Communi-
DDL/EDDL (electronic device de- The new Suite v.2.0 includes: im- cation Foundation, Austin, Tex.
scription language) Host Test Suite proved Encoded Test DDs updated to www.hartcomm.org
v2.0 was released. The test suite is align with the current Test Specifi-
used by suppliers and developers of cations; test report spreadsheets for Save energy at data centers
host products to test compliance of documenting test results; new and and more with this suite
their HART implementation and is improved Xmtr-MV v2.5; and other In December, this company intro-
duced its Decathlon suite including
software, hardware and services for
data centers to provide a single view
of IT, facilities and energy manage-
Show Preview
Thermo Fisher
Scientific
Phoenix Contact
PROTECT PUMPS
DRY RUNNING CAVITATION BEARING FAILURE OVERLOAD
PUMPING
POWER
AMPS
Circle 34 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-34
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 32D-3
Mller
Show Preview
Durco Mark 3 ANSI pump. Both ANSI connections for inside and outside
and ISO pump versions feature the IPS washing enables a reduction of
Beacon condition monitoring device water consumption. The units are
a data acquisition, logging and visual constructed of stainless steel with
alert device that is designed to moni- EPDM seals. Hall 3.1, Stand A75
tor vibration in addition to tempera- Mller GmbH, Rheinfelden,
ture. Constructed of stainless steel and Germany
mounted on top of the bearing housing, www.mueller-gmbh.com
the IPS Beacon delivers early warning
notification to users, allowing them This established machine
to take proactive measures to extend now bags even faster
bearing life and mechanical seal of the The Haver Adams will be the cen-
pump. Hall 8.0, Stand A64 Flowserve terpiece of this firms exhibition.
Corp., Irving, Tex. Since its launch six years ago, this
www.flowserve.com packaging system, which uses the
Form-Fill-Seal principle, has been
This washing machine cleans improved to meet users demands
drums in a few minutes for speed and product variety. Today, extended storage times in wind and
The Drum Washing Machine DCM products with poor flow properties weather, a guaranteed cleanliness
(photo) cleans the inside and outside of and powder-type products with granu- along the entire supply chain and an
30200-L drums, with a washing cycle lar components and micro-granulates improved price-to-benefit ratio, says
of 510 min. Cleaning nozzles within can be packed into compact, sealed, the manufacturer. Hall 3.0, Stand F38
the system can be connected directly weather-tight bags at the rate of 2,000 Haver & Boecker, Oelde, Germany
to a facilitys water loop (2 bars pres- bags per hour. The advantages of this www.haverboecker.com
sue, 35 L/min flowrate), and separate kind of durable packaging include Gerald Ondrey
Circle 2 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-02
32D-4 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Spray Drying
Parameters
Department Editor: Scott Jenkins
GEA Niro
mong the most widely used technolo- (usually compressed air) through
the most common method used in spray around the atomizer. This cre-
dryers, a rotating disc or wheel breaks the ates a co-current flow of gas
liquid stream into droplets. A liquid mist is and droplets and particles. The chambers airflow patterns and temperature distribu-
formed horizontally from the atomizer wheel. height must allow particles sufficient retention tions within the drying chamber. For most
Centrifugal atomizers rotate in the range of time to dry. Larger particle sizes require applications, the gas disperser has adjust-
5,000 to 25,000 rpm. The size of the drop- larger-diameter drying chambers. able guide vanes that allow for fine-tuning.
lets produced is roughly inversely propor- The residence time should be selected Industrial radial fans are used to move the
tional to the peripheral speed of the wheel, based on the experience of the products gas through the system. Sizing of system
or disc, which typically have diameters in the known drying characteristics and on the components can be based on gas flow.
range of 5 to 50 cm. The use of variable- desired particle size. This allows direct
speed drives can make the control of the calculations of the drying chamber volume. Evaporation rate
droplet size straightforward. The smallest Another configuration involves installing Inside a spray dryer, the evaporation rate
rotary atomizers handle 110 kg/h of liquid the pressure nozzle at the bottom of the is directly proportional to the temperature
feed in the laboratory, while the largest com- chamber, so that the spray shoots upward difference from input to outlet multiplied by
mercial units, driven by 1,000-kW motors, from the bottom. This configuration is used the mass flow. Values for the outlet temper-
can handle more than 200 metric ton/h. in cases where the product is a coarse pow- ature are usually determined experimen-
Nozzle. Atomization with a pressure der and the production rate is lower. tally, since they depend on the materials
nozzle involves pressurizing a liquid using equilibrium isotherm, and true equilibrium
a pump, and forcing it through the orifice or Collecting dried solids is never actually reached. The inlet tem-
a nozzle. Typical orifice sizes are 0.53.0 Coarse powders are most easily collected perature is also determined experimentally,
mm, which limits the capacity of the nozzle directly from the bottom of the drying cham- and should be as high as possible without
to 7501,000 kg/h of liquid feed, depend- ber. For fine powders, cyclones or bag filters risking product degradation.
ing on pressure, viscosity and solids content become the primary collecting points. The
of the feed. Larger pressure drops across particles must be separated from the drying Safety
the orifice produce smaller droplets, so to media, which is cooler (due to evaporation) In spray-drying operations, safety proce-
reduce particle size for a given feedrate, a and more humid than before drying. dures related to dust explosions must be
smaller orifice and higher pump pressure considered carefully, including determina-
must be provided to maintain the same Gas flow tion of dust explosion pressure rise (Kst), the
mass flow. Although simple, the pres- Heating the drying gas that flows through maximum dust explosion pressure (Pmax),
sure nozzle is often difficult to maintain, the spray dryer may be accomplished by minimum ignition energy (MIE), minimum
especially in multiple-nozzle systems. Most direct combustion of natural gas, by indirect ignition temperature (MIT), and minimum
of the difficulty results from plugging, as heating with shell-and-tube heat exchang- auto-ignition temperature (MAIT).
well as wear of the nozzle insert, which can ers, or by electric heaters (used in small
Editors note: The material in this Facts at Your Fin-
change the characteristics of the nozzle. spray dryers). Most gas dispersers are gertips was adapted from the article cited here: .
Two-fluid pneumatic. In this type of atomiza- configured with the help of computational Moller, J.T. and Fredsted, S., A primer on spray dry-
tion, the feed interacts with a second fluid fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to define ing. Chem. Eng., November 2009, pp. 3440.
Feature
Cover Story
Report
Draining Vessels D
Pt
hL
Edward H. Steve
Chemical Engineer Z X
FIGURE 1. In a vertical
T
hroughout the chemical process
industries (CPI), the need to cylindrical, lat-bottom
Z2
tank, liquid is lowing Tank side wall
drain a tank or process vessel into the outlet nozzle
arises. In batch-type plants, it is (point 1) located at x distance above 2
a regular occurrence and is one factor the bottom of the tank and through a Pt
that affects the total cycle time per pipeline to some terminus (point 2)
batch and ultimately the entire pro-
Tank bottom
duction capacity of the plant itself. size of the pipeline is the same size as
Some operations rely on draining a the outlet nozzle and does not change
freely flowing Newtonian liquid from between points 1 and 2. The pressures
a process vessel to another vessel or to above the liquid in the tank and at the
elsewhere without the assistance of a terminus are both Pt. FIGURE 2. If the inside sur- Drain nozzle
pump. This article develops the equa- Before draining begins, the liquid face of the outlet nozzle is
tions that a process engineer can use fills the tank to some initial height (hi) aligned with the inside surface of the
tank bottom as shown here, distance x is
to easily estimate the time required above the outlet nozzle. If the inside 0 and hi incorporates the entire contents
for draining a vertical, cylindrical pro- surface of the outlet nozzle is aligned of the tank
cess vessel with a flat bottom, a cone with the inside surface of the tank bot-
bottom or an ASME F&D (dish) bot- tom as shown in Figure 2, distance x static pressure represented by Z +
tom. Unlike other articles on the sub- is zero and hi incorporates the entire h. Note that hL also decreases dur-
ject [1], this one includes the effect of contents of the tank. As draining pro- ing draining because differentiating
the connected drain line. gresses, h decreases. Equation (3) gives the following:
Using the equations and the ex- The Bernoulli Equation applies to
dhL = dh (4)
amples in this article, the reader can the flow in the pipeline between points
construct an Excel spreadsheet for 1 and 2: A basic material balance applies to de-
repeating the calculations to estimate veloping the equation needed to pre-
the approximate drain times for a se- dict the drain time for the tank:
ries of cylindrical, cone-bottom and In Out = Accumulation
dish-bottom tanks. (1) Because no liquid is being added to
Tanks with other head styles and This article assumes isothermal flow, the tank, In = 0.
horizontal and non-cylindrically so the liquid density remains un- Out is the rate of liquid discharge
shaped tanks are not considered here. changed; because the pipeline size does from the outlet pipeline and is given
Meanwhile, this article does not deal not change, the velocities at points 1 by [3]:
with special fluids such as slurries or and 2 are the same. Thus, Equation (1)
Q = 19.65 d2 (hL/K)0.5 (5)
non-Newtonian liquids. can be rearranged as follows:
Because hL decreases during draining,
hL = Z + [(144 / ) (P1 P2)] (2)
FLAT BOTTOM Q decreases as well. Therefore, the
Equation and its basis The Z term is the change in eleva- Reynolds Number (NRe) in the pipe-
Figure 1 shows the height of liquid tion of the discharge pipeline and is a line also changes during draining.
(h) above the outlet nozzle of a verti- fixed value. The K in Equation (5) is the total re-
cal cylindrical flat-bottom tank dur- Because P1 = Pt + (h/144) and P2 = sistance to flow and is the sum of four
ing draining. The liquid is flowing into Pt, Equation (2) becomes: individual resistances:
the outlet nozzle (point 1) located at x
hL = Z + h (3) K = KEntrance + KValves&Fittings
distance above the bottom of the tank
+ KPipe + KExit (6)
and through a pipeline to some termi- Equation (3) indicates that the friction
nus (point 2). Equations in this article caused by flow in the pipeline between The values for two of the resistances
are based on the assumption that the points 1 and 2 consumes the entire in Equation (6) are found in the litera-
34 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
0.06
AVERAGE PIPELINE FRICTION FACTOR
0.05
0.03
0.02
much less than 500,000 NRe.
0.01
Inspection of the data shows that the value of f drops by approxi-
mately 0.002 between 100,000 and 300,000 NRe; it drops only 0
0.0005 between 300,000 and 500,000 NRe. Because the value 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000
of f at fully turbulent flow (fT) is given as 0.018 [9], and the value NRe
is 0.0181 at 500,000 NRe, no significant reduction in f occurs at 0.06
values greater than 500,000 NRe. 0.05
The lower plot in Figure 3 shows f as a function of NRe up to 500,000
NRe. The superimposed Excel Trendline indicates that the equation of 0.04
the curve for that plot is y = 0.1804x0.1822. The fit of the Trendline is 0.03 y = 0.1804x
not perfect, but is sufficient for calculating an average f.
The average friction factor (fAVE) can be calculated by determining 0.02
the area under the plot and dividing by the included range of NRe. 0.01
For the lower plot in Figure 3, the basic mathematics are:
0
0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000
(B1-1) NRe
FIGURE 3. These plots show calculated values of friction
Integrated and expanded with values for NRe gives: factor (f) for 3-in. schedule-40 pipe with roughness 0.00015
plotted as a function of NRe. The top graph shows no sig-
niicant reduction in f at >500,000 but a sharp decrease at
values <<500,000. The bottom graph narrows in on NRe up to
500,000 and provides a suitable, itted trendline equation for
calculating an average f
(B1-2)
Plots like Figure 3 were constructed for schedule-40 pipe in sizes of the fAVE value as well as the range of NRe used and the plot
1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 in. After judging what should be the value equation for each pipe size; the friction factor at complete turbu-
for NRe2 for each pipe size, fAVE was calculated. Table 1 presents lence from the literature [9] is also indicated for reference.
ture [4] and are accepted as indepen- TABLE 1. AVERAGE FRICTION FACTOR FOR SCHEDULE 40 PIPE
dent of NRe: (ROUGHNESS = 0.00015)
KExit = 1 Pipe size, in. NRe1 NRe2 f vs. NRe plot equation fAVE fT
For a sharp edged opening: 1 2,000 500,000 y = 0.1323x0.1411 0.0241 0.023
KEntrance = 0.5 1.5 2,000 300,000 y = 0.1722x0.1764 0.023 0.021
Values for other entrance conditions 2 2,000 300,000 y = 0.1903x0.1858 0.0222 0.019
3 2,000 500,000 y = 0.1804x0.1822 0.0201 0.018
can be found in Ref. 4.
4 2,000 500,000 y = 0.1933x0.1908 0.0194 0.017
However, values for the other two 6 2,000 740,000 y = 0.1904x0.1908 0.0178 0.015
resistances (KPipe and KValves&Fittings) 8 2,000 1,200,000 y = 0.1815x0.1869 0.0163 0.014
must be found through some analysis.
In general, the resistance to flow changes during draining, average val- Equation (8):
through straight pipe is given by [5]: ues can also be used when determin-
ing KValves&Fittings. The box, Average
KPipe = f (Lpipe/Dpipe) (7)
resistance to flow in valves and fittings (9)
For a given length of pipe with a given (p. 37), discusses an approach to calcu- Substituting Equation (4) into Equa-
inside diameter, the (Lpipe/Dpipe) ratio lating these averages, and Table 2 lists tion (9) gives the following:
is constant no matter what the flow the results for various sizes of several
might be. The friction factor (f), how- types of valves and fittings that could
ever, is a function of NRe so KPipe is be part of a drain line. (10)
not constant as the flow decreases Obviously, K can then be calculated Putting the pieces of the basic mate-
during drainage. A way to avoid itera- for the variable flow in the drain line rial balance together yields the math-
tive calculations is to use an average by summing the values of the four ematical version with flow units of
friction factor (fAVE) in Equation (7) to individual resistances according to gal/min:
calculate KPipe. The box, Average pipe- Equation (6).
line friction factor (above) discusses Returning to the basic material bal-
that approach to calculating fAVE and ance, Accumulation is the rate of vol- (11)
Table 1 lists the results for various ume reduction in the tank. The volume Equation (11) can be re-arranged into
sizes of schedule 40 pipe. (gallons) in the tank above the outlet a form that can easily be integrated:
The literature reports [6, 7] that a nozzle at any time is given by:
three-constant (3-K) method should be
VCY = 7.48(D2h)/4 (8)
used to calculate the resistances to flow
(12)
through valves and fittings because The volume decreases with time ac-
they vary with NRe. Because the flow cording to the first derivative of Using the following model:
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 35
Cover Story
0.3000
1 in.
1.5 in.
2 in.
3 in.
4 in.
6 in.
8 in.
Kf
or fitting. The table in Ref. 7 should be the source of the values be-
cause the constants have been updated from those given in Ref. 6. 0.1000
Note that (K1/NRe) is variable; the Ki [1 + (Kd/Dn0.3)] term is con-
stant for any given pipe size. As the influence of the variable part 0.0000
becomes small (approaches zero), Kf becomes equal to the constant. 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000
An average value for Kf can be calculated by adding an average NRe
value of the variable part of the equation to the constant part.
0.08
The first plot in Figure 4 shows calculated values of Kf for vari-
ous sizes of a flow-through-tee, plotted as a function of NRe on 1 in. Power (1 in.)
0.06
arithmetic coordinates. The lowest value for NRe is 2,000 while
K1/NRe
the largest value is the estimated beginning of fully turbulent flow
from a Moody chart [5]. Note the sharp decrease in Kf for all 0.04
sizes at low NRe due to the variable part of the equation becom- y = 150x 1
ing less significant. 0.02
Inspection of the (K1/NRe) data for the flow-through-tee shows that
the value decreases by 0.0015 between 50,000 and 100,000 NRe; 0
it drops 0.001 between 100,000 and 300,000 NRe and 0.0003 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000
between 300,000 and 740,000 NRe. Based on those differential NRe
data, no significant reduction occurs above 300,000 NRe. FIGURE 4. Resistance to low in a low-through tee (Kf, irst
The lower plot in Figure 4 shows K1/NRe for the flow-through- graph) decreases sharply for all sizes at low NRe because
tee as a function of NRe up to 300,000 NRe; K1 is 150. The the variable part of the equation (Kf/NRe, second graph) be-
superimposed Excel trendline confirms that the equation of the comes less signiicant
curve is y = 150x1.
The average value of K1/NRe can be calculated by determining is related to the type of fitting or valve, not to the size.
the area under the plot and dividing by the included range of The average value of Kf for any size flow-through tee is then
NRe. For the lower plot in Figure 4, the basic mathematics are: (K1/NRe)ave plus the constant related to that size.
After judging what should be the value for NRe2 for each fitting
and valve, (K1/NRe)ave was calculated for a flow-through tee,
90- and 45-deg. elbows, and a gate and a ball valve. After cal-
(B2-2) culating the constant part of Equation (B2-1), the average value
Integrating and expanding with values for NRe gives: for Kf was easy to determine.
Table 2 presents the applicable constants, the range of NRe
(K1/NRe)ave = [150 (ln 300,000 ln 2,000) ] = 0.0025 (B2-3) used and the average Kf value for each pipe size of the various
(300,0002,000) fittings and valves listed; the constant Kf value from the literature
Note that this average value applies to all pipe sizes because K1 [10] is also indicated for reference.
CONE BOTTOM der and a cone are different, so are FIGURE 5. Here,
the volume of
Figures 5 and 6 depict a vertical pro- the individual drain times. The total a partially illed
cess vessel comprised of an upper right drain time for the tank, therefore, is cone is illustrated
circular cylinder and a lower circular the sum of the times required to drain
right cone. This article assumes that both portions. Each time must be cal-
there is a liquid level in the upper por- culated separately.
tion, as shown, before draining begins. Cylindrical portion. For draining
D
While liquid is still in the upper the cylindrical portion, Equation (14) Rc Pt
part during draining, the liquid fills applies because the geometry is iden-
R
the cylinder to some height (h) and the tical to a flat bottom tank. But, the h hC
Z1
entire cone to height hC; the height of initial and final values for hL1 and hL2
liquid above the outlet nozzle located must be defined carefully: 1
hL
at the bottom of the cone is (h +hC).
hL1 = hi + hC + Z (14C) Z
Liquid drains from the outlet nozzle
(point 1) to some terminus (point 2) as hL2 = hC + Z (14D)
Z2
discussed above. The reader can reason
that hL = Z + h + hC and that Equa- Because the value for hi is related only 2
tion (4) is still valid for the cylinder. to the volume of the liquid in the cylin- Pt
During draining, the height of liquid drical portion, the volume in the cone
in the cylinder decreases, and the liquid must be subtracted from the total vol- lowing discussion can be adapted to a
surface descends into the cone; then both ume in the tank before calculating hi cone tank by itself, if appropriate.
the cross-sectional area and the height with Equation (15). The volume of liquid (gallons) con-
of the liquid in the cone decrease. Cone portion. Figure 5 depicts the tained in the circular right cone shown
Because the geometries of a cylin- cone bottom only. Note that the fol- in Figure 5 is given by the following:
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 37
NOMENCLATURE
a radius of a spherical hL loss of static pressure P2 pressure at outlet of VCY liquid volume in a cylin-
sector, ft due to fluid friction, ft drain pipeline, psi drical tank, gal
d inside diameter of outlet hL1 initial loss of static pres- Pt pressure above liquid x height of outlet nozzle
nozzle and drain sure due to fluid flow, ft in tank and at outlet of above flat bottom, ft
pipeline, in. hL2 final loss of static pres- drain pipeline, psi Z1 elevation of outlet noz-
D inside diameter of sure due to fluid flow, ft Q rate of liquid discharge, zle, ft
tank, ft K total resistance coeffi- gal/min Z2 elevation of outlet of
Dn nominal pipe size, in. cient* RC radius of a right circular drain pipeline, ft
Do outside diameter of Kd resistance coefficient in cone, ft Z change in elevation of
tank, ft 3-K method related to RD radius of spherical por- drain pipeline, ft
DPipe inside diameter of outlet diameter of valve or fit- tion of an ASME F&D cone angle, deg.
pipeline, ft ting, in.0.3 head, ft total time to drain a tank
f friction factor* Kf resistance coefficient for RS radius of sphere used to with a cone or a dish
fAVE average friction factor* valve or fitting* describe spherical sector, bottom, min
fT friction factor at fully de- Ki resistance coefficient in ft c time to drain a cone bot-
veloped turbulent flow* 3-K method related to v1 fluid velocity at inlet of tom, min
g acceleration due to grav- type of valve or fitting* outlet nozzle, ft/s B time to drain an ASME
ity, ft/s2 K1 resistance coefficient in v2 fluid velocity at outlet of F&D (dish) bottom, min
h height of liquid, ft 3-K method related to drain pipeline, ft/s f time to drain a flat bot-
hB depth of an ASME F&D NRe* vS depth of a spherical sec- tom tank or a cylinder,
head, ft LPipe length of drain pipeline, tor, ft min
hC height of liquid in a right ft VB liquid volume in a 1 density of liquid at inlet
circular cone, ft NRe Reynolds number* dished head, gal of outlet nozzle, lb/ft3
hi initial height of liquid in P1 pressure at inlet of outlet VC liquid volume in a cone, 2 density of liquid at outlet
cylindrical portion of a nozzle, psi gal of drain pipeline, lb/ft3
tank, ft * Dimensionless
VC = 7.48[(R2h)/3] (16) material balance for the cone gives the FIGURE 6.
Note that determining the radius of mathematical version with flow units Tanks with a
cone bottom
the liquid in the cone is a matter of of gal/min: are comprised
trigonometry: of an upper
R = h/(tan ) (17) right circular
The value of angle is a function of the cylinder and a
lower circular
construction of the cone so it remains right cone
constant; Equation (17), therefore, cor- (22) D
relates the height and radius of liquid Equation (22) can be rearranged into
in the cone during draining. a form that can easily be integrated: Pt
Liquid drains from the outlet nozzle
(point 1) to some terminus (point 2)
as discussed above. Again, the reader
can reason that hL = Z + h and that h
given by the first derivative of Equa- expression for the drain time from a
2
tion (18) with respect to time: cone bottom: Pt
FIGURE 7. An CL
ASME F&D (dish) s
bottom tank is co-
prised of an upper
D right circular cyl-
inder and a lower
Pt dish bottom
hB RD 2
Tangent line
h Rs Rs
DC
Cylindrical portion
(not included in
FIGURE 8. The surface and volume
ASME dish head is of head) FIGURE 9. Here, the geometry of a
Z1
composed of a central spherical sector is illustrated
1 spherical section bor-
hL dered by knuckle por-
hB
Z tions that provide the bordered by knuckle portions that
transition between the provide the transition between the
spherical shape and spherical shape and the cylindrical
Z2
the cylindrical shape shape of the vessel; the radius of the
of the vessel
2 spherical portion (RD) is approxi-
Pt mately equal to the inside diameter
Step B. The initial volume in the cylin- (dish) bottom. While liquid is still in of the tank (D) and the depth of the
drical portion is 1,000 336 or 664 gal. the upper part during draining, the dish to the tangent line (hB) is ap-
Step C. Using Equation (15): liquid fills the cylinder to some height proximately 0.169 D. Per the calcu-
hi = 2.307 ft (h) and the entire dish to height hB; lation in the box, Assuming dish is
Step D. The same K applies (as in the the height of liquid above the outlet spherical (p. 40), modeling the entire
previous, flat-bottom tank example nozzle is (h +hB). head shape with a spherical sector
calculation) Liquid drains from the outlet nozzle introduces only a small error into
K1/2 = 2.3692. (point 1) to some terminus (point 2) the draining theory.
Step E. For the cylinder: as discussed above. Once again, the Using the basic Equation (B3-1) (see
1. hL1 = hi + hC + Z reader can reason that hL = Z + h + Assuming dish is spherical, p. 40) with
= 2.307 + 3.5 + 3 = 8.807 ft hB and that Equation (4) is still valid vS = h and RS = D, the volume of liquid
hL11/2 = 2.5436 for the cylinder. (gal) contained in the partially filled
2. hL2 = hC + Z During draining, the height of liquid dish shown in Figure 10 is given by:
= 3.5 + 3 = 6.5 ft in the cylinder decreases, and the liquid VB = 7.48[(Dh2) (h3/3)] (25)
hL21/2 = 2.5495 surface descends into the dish; then both As with the other shapes, the rate of
3. Using Equation (14), f = 6.8 min the cross-sectional area and the height volume reduction in the dish during
Step F. For the cone: of the liquid in the dish decrease. the draining process is given by the
1. tan = hC/RC = 3.5/(7/2) = 1 Because the geometries of a cylin- first derivative of Equation (25) with
[(tan )2] = 1 der and the dish are different, so are respect to time:
2. hL1 = hC + Z = 3.5 + 3 = 6.5 ft the individual drain times. The total
hL1 2.5 = 107.717 drain time for the tank, therefore, is
hL11.5 = 16.572 the sum of the times required to drain (26)
hL10.5 = 2.5495 both portions. Each time must be cal- Liquid drains from the outlet nozzle
3. hL2 = Z = 3 ft culated separately. (point 1) to some terminus (point 2) as
hL22.5 = 15.588 Cylindrical portion. For draining discussed above. The reader can reason
hL21.5 = 5.196 the cylindrical portion, Equation (14) that hL = Z + h and that Equation (4)
hL20.5 = 1.732 applies because the geometry is iden- is still valid for the dish. Because hL =
4. Using Equation (24), c = 4.03 min tical to a flat bottom tank. But, the Z + h, the following are true:
Step G. Total drain time for the entire initial and final values for hL1 and hL2
tank is: must again be defined carefully: h = hL Z (27)
= f + c = 6.8 + 4.0 = 10.8 min hL1 = hi + hB + Z (14E) h2 = hL2 2hLZ + Z2 (28)
Calculating the drain time for a pro- hL2 = hB + Z (14F)
cess vessel with an ASME F&D (dish) Because the value for hi is related only Substituting Equation (4), Equation
bottom head requires a similar pro- to the volume of the liquid in the cylin- (27) and Equation (28) into Equation
cedure, but the time for draining drical portion, the volume in the dish (26) then gives:
the bottom head requires a different must be subtracted from the total vol-
mathematical expression. ume in the tank before calculating hi
with Equation (15).
ASME F&D (DISH) BOTTOM Dish portion. As Figure 8 (see As-
Figure 7 depicts a vertical process ves- suming dish is spherical, p. 40) (29)
sel comprised of an upper right circu- shows, an ASME F&D head is com- Putting together the pieces of the basic
lar cylinder and a lower ASME F&D posed of a central spherical section material balance for the dish gives the
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 39
ASSUMING DISH IS SPHERICAL
s Figure 8 [11] shows, the shape of an ASME F&D (dish) head is spherical up to the
Cover Story
A extremities where knuckle portions make the transition from sphere to the cylindrical
shape of the vessel shell. The radius of the spherical portion is the outside diameter
of the tank [12]. To simplify the mathematics of draining with an error of less than 5%,
the ASME F&D head can be considered a spherical segment as explained below.
FIGURE 10. The volume of the spherical segment with one base shown in Figure 9 is given by
Here, the volume
Equation (B3-1) [13]:
in a partially
illed dish is il- VB = (/3) vS2 (3RS vS) (B3-1)
lustrated
For an ASME F&D head, vS is approximately 0.169D [12]; RS can be approximated by
D the inside diameter of the tank because the thickness of the head is small by comparison.
Substituting these values into Equation (B3-1) and solving for VB gives:
VB = 0.08467D3, ft3 (B3-2)
Z1
1 hL
VB = 0.6333D3, gal (B3-3)
h
Z
hB Because the actual volume (in gallons) in a dish head is approximately 0.606D3 [12],
Z2
the error due to assuming that the head is a spherical sector is as follows:
%ERROR = [(0.6333/0.606) 1]100 = 4.51% (B3-4)
2
Pt
O
ne of the most energy-intensive 8. In the case of commonly occurring upsets, do they have a stages
utilities for many facilities in pattern or connected event?
the chemical process industries
(CPI) is the steam system. Tra-
ditionally, steam-use optimization has endpoints providing a more complete tive exercise may still prove valuable
centered on efficient heat transfer and analysis. With potentially billions of for the complex. It is still necessary to
eliminating waste [1]. Further optimi- dollars in capital investment depend- draw on the knowledge of experienced
zation can involve a broader look at ing on a reliable supply of steam, operators who have run similar sys-
how steam supply and consumption employing dynamic modeling during tems in the past. Supplementing their
interact dynamically throughout a the design development of integrated knowledge and experience with the
large complex. This type of optimiza- systems is worth the extra effort. This appropriate process engineering and
tion often results in increased inter- article breaks down the task of setting modeling techniques will allow for suf-
connectivity and interdependency. up a control strategy into four basic ficiently accurate system emulation.
Many CPI facilities have a central steps (Figure 1).
steam-production area containing boil- Model
ers and boiler feedwater treatment, as Investigate In the typical workflow of modern
well as additional steam generators In order to properly control any sys- process design, a steady-state model
scattered throughout the facility (for tem, a thorough understanding of the is usually developed to facilitate
example in the petroleum refining interactions within the system (the the creation of utility balances and
sector there are ethylene and catalytic system behavior) is essential. Under- to study various operating cases.
cracking units). If a facility is built standing system behavior begins with A wide array of modeling software
in several stages, as is often the case, gathering as much information as pos- has been developed [2] and is in use
steam generating systems may be sible about a given process or facility. within the CPI. When choosing the
separated by considerable distances. Ask some fundamental questions, such platform for the steady-state model,
Over these distances, the stability of as those outlined in the box above. keep in mind the potential for run-
the integrated steam system could be For an existing operational facility, ning the model dynamically.
jeopardized by inappropriate control there is no better resource to answer Steady-state modeling is essential,
strategies. How should one go about these questions than the senior opera- but a plant will never truly achieve
setting up a control strategy and veri- tions staff. They have direct knowl- steady state. To achieve a reliable and
fying that it is stable and appropriate edge of how the system behaves in stable steam supply throughout the
for a particular complex? realtime during real upsets under real complex, the fully integrated steam
Steady-state modeling and steam conditions. Defining these upsets will system must be analyzed in a dy-
balances only show the endpoints of become an essential input to dynamic namic state to understand the prob-
system behavior. Dynamic model- model development. able interactions between the system
ing fills in the space between these For new facilities, this investiga- components. Operating facilities are
42 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Source
3 Source
3 pipe User A User A
Source Source 1 pipe FC
1 piping piping out Source
Common 3 out User A User A Sink
Source header 1 Total production pipe out FV A
1 Source
2 piping Combined Common
Mix-
Pri source header Mix-101 To users A
Source Source 2 100 out 1
2 piping out Common
header
pipe 2
FIGURE 2. This example is used to demonstrate a steady- TEE-100 User B User B
pipe FC
state model flowsheet (Pri used in the figures stands for
primary) Common To
header User B User B Sink
users pipe out FV B
out 2 B
Master PC Source 3 FC
SP 300.0 psig SP 50000 lb/h
PV 298.7 psig PV 50000 lb/h
OP 24.94 % OP 50.00 %
OP 24.94 % Rate limiter 3
OP 24.94 % User A pipe out User A FC
Rate limiter 1
Source Temperature 474.8 F SP 1.000e+005 lb/h
PV value 24.94 $
3 FC Pressure 297.6 psig PV 9.973e+004 lb/h
OP value 4.985e+004 lb/h Master Mass flow 5.977e-004 lb/h OP 50.03 %
Rate limiter 1 PC Source
3 Source Total production
3 pipe Temperature 475.0 F User A User A
Source Source 1 Pressure 298.6 psig pipe FC
1 piping piping out Source Mass flow 1.497e-005 lb/h
Common 3 out User A User A Sink
Source header 1 Total production pipe out FV A
1 Source Source 2
2 piping piping out Combined Common User B FC
Mix- header Mix-101
100 Pri source To users A SP 5.000e+004 lb/h
Source out 1
2 PV 4.988e+004 lb/h
Common OP 24.84 %
header
Rate limiter 2 Combined Phi source pipe 2
Temperature 475.0 F TEE-100 User B User B
Pressure 298.7 psig pipe FC
Rate limiter 2
Mass flow 9.970e+004 lb/h Common
PV value 24.94 $ To User B User B Sink
OP value 4.985e+004 lb/h header users
out 2 pipe out FV B
B
User B pipe out
Temperature 475.0 F
FIGURE 3. A flowsheet that is ready for dynamic mode is illustrated here Pressure 298.5 psig
Mass flow 4.991e+004 lb/h
generally not able to risk a major steam header, while a third source sits gained from the operators, the design
shutdown in order to test system re- close to the process user areas. engineer must account for the time
sponses to the upsets of interest. The This same simulation flowsheet can factors involved in transitioning from
next best option is to model the sys- be adapted for dynamic evaluation by normal to alternate operation. For this
tem dynamically. The dynamic model adding some basic controls as shown example, users in Area B are reducing
becomes a testing platform on which in Figure 3. demand to reach the alternate operat-
control concepts can be proven and Using this source-sink model of a ing mode. Through consultation with
adjusted if necessary [3]. steam distribution header, some of the operators, it becomes clear that
Dynamic process simulations fill the aspects of the system behavior this demand reduction normally takes
the gap between different steady- can be explored. The system may have place over a 2-min period. Figure 4 is
state operating cases, showing a two design cases that result in differ- a graph of what this may look like in a
more complete picture of system be- ent steam balances. The steady-state dynamic simulation.
havior. Using the knowledge gained model gives a snapshot of what is Starting from a steady state cor-
during the investigative process, a happening when everything is stable. responding to normal operation, the
model can be constructed that will be Table 1 shows what these data may demand reduction begins at 120 sec-
useful for testing the system under look like. onds. The User B demand is ramped
changing conditions. Switching to a dynamic analysis steadily downward for the prescribed
Example. Suppose the system to be gives a more complete picture of the two minutes. The source-steam flow
modeled consisted of three sources and system behavior in the time between controllers initiate a correspond-
two users of steam. The steady-state the two operating cases. At this point, ing reduction in steam production
model flowsheet may look like Figure the previous consultation with op- to maintain the system balance.
2. In this example system, two sources erators who understand the system This production decrease is typically
of steam exist on one end of a main comes into play. Using the knowledge achieved through some type of master
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 43
TABLE 1. STEADY-STATE RESULTS FOR TWO OPERATING SCENARIOS
Feature Report
Name Normal operation Alternate operation
80,000
decreases at different capacities.
In this example, the Source 1 and 60,000 Source 2
2 characteristics are such that their Mass flow, lb/h
40,000
response is limited to a rate of 10%
of total capacity per minute. Figure 20,000
User B pipe out
5 shows a plot of the pressure at the 0 Mass flow, lb/h
main sensing point for Sources 1
and 2. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Again starting from steady state Time, s
and introducing the disturbance at
120 seconds, the header pressure ini- FIGURE 4. The dynamic behavior of steam sources during transition, as discussed
in the example, is shown here
tially rises due to the slow response
time of Sources 1 and 2. The sluggish
340
nature of these steam sources also con-
tributes to the overcompensation and 320
severe drop in header pressure. The
Pressure, psig
300
sources are eventually able to compen-
sate for the change in steam demand, 280
Combined Pri
but a large oscillation has been expe- 260 source
rienced in the interim. These types of pressure, psig
240
oscillations can cause process upsets
throughout a large facility. Note that 220
this example is for illustrative pur- 200
poses only and some of this lag can be 0 100 200 300 400 500 600
attenuated with careful tuning. Time, s
A validation step is essential to ver-
ify the models ability to emulate the FIGURE 5. This plot shows the dynamic response of main header pressure as
system behavior. Typically, a model given in the example
review is performed involving key
personnel from engineering and oper- Once validated, the model will pro- magnitude can be made during the op-
ations departments. The information vide valuable insight into system be- eration of a facility. The magnitude of
gained during the investigative step havior and interactions. It is the high the change need only be greater than
regarding common upset events is degree of interconnectivity in facilities the noise band of the target dependent
particularly useful at this stage. Ide- that results in greater efficiencies, but variable. Proper planning and prepa-
ally, the model is put through a series can lead to unexpected interactions. A ration is essential for this type of test-
of known scenarios, and the result- well-constructed dynamic model can ing, since there is a risk of upsetting
ing predicted response is compared lead to the discovery of these interac- an operating unit. All test parameters
to the known response. Any required tions and will allow a facility time to must be documented and agreed upon
fine tuning can be implemented, and develop a plan for controlling the inte- prior to testing.
the model can be used for subsequent grated system.
analysis with a reasonable degree If the model is emulating an exist- Plan
of confidence. The model can also be ing system, step testing can be used to Using the developed and validated
used to predict system behavior under develop actual system behavior data. system model, a master control strat-
new conditions. Incremental changes of a tolerable egy can be developed. Using engineer-
44 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
MASTER CONTROL STRATEGY KEY CONSIDERATIONS
In assembling a preliminary control strategy for steam systems, the following key con-
siderations should be included:
s ude
Tube Bundleof any existing bundle to incl.
Duplication materials and performance
dimensions,
gers
Heat Exchan or replacement exchangers
Design new
ication.
for your appl
Coils t or new.
Replacemen
1-800-339-7991
Available in stainless steel.
www.MultiThermCoils.com
Heat Transfer Fluids Industrial Coils HVAC Equipment
Circle 38 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-38
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 45
Feature Report
Authors
Ali Bourji is a senior techni- David Ballow is a principal Martha Choroszy is a chief
cal director at WorleyParsons process engineer at Worley- process engineer at Worley-
(6330 West Loop South, Bel- Parsons (6330 West Loop Parsons (6330 West Loop
laire, TX 77401; Email: ali. South, Bellaire, TX 77401; South, Bellaire, TX 77401;
bourji@worleyparsons.com; Phone: 713-407-5000) and is Phone: 713-407-5000). She
Phone: 713-407-5000). Bourji a professional engineer. He received a B.S.Ch.E. from
received his B.S.Ch.E. and received a B.S.Ch.E. from the Massachusetts Institute
M.S.Ch.E. from the Univer- Louisiana Tech University of Technology and an M.B.A.
sity of Houston and his Ph.D. and is a member of AIChE. from Tulane University. She
from Lamar University. He is a licensed professional en-
is a professional engineer gineer in Texas and a mem-
and a member of AIChE and ber of AIChE and NFPA. She
AFPM (formerly NPRA). Bourji is the author is the author of numerous publications, a re-
of numerous publications and serves on the cipient of Tulanes Allen Vorholt Award and has
Chemical Engineering Ph.D. Advisory Council served as a Blue Ribbon Panel Member to define
at Lamar University. the national agenda for the U.S. Core Combus-
Spencer_ACHEMA_Specials_Ad_7x4.875_051512:Layout 1 5/16/12 8:12 AM Page 1
tion Research Program.
In the process industry, Spencer applies more than 120 years of industry
air and gas handling equip- technology leadership to engineer, design and
ment must perform awlessly manufacture solutions for extreme air and gas
under very tough requirements: handling challenges. Our custom blowers and gas
Corrosive, toxic and other gases boosters are unique and engineered for their target
such as suldes, nitrogen, halogens, application. We fabricate from special metals and
acids, cyanides, hydrogen and ammonia utilize corrosion-resistant coatings, restrictive shaft
Temperatures to 1100 F (593 C) sealing and leak-tight designs.
Casing design pressures to 1000 psig (6895 kPa) Only Spencer offers the process industry more choices,
Inlet pressures to 500 psig (3447 kPa) more options and more experience in providing air
Differential pressures to 20 psig (138 kPa) and gas handling equipment for hot, high-pressure
Volumes to 30000 icfm (50977 m 3/hr) or corrosive gases.
Leak-tight performance
The Spencer Turbine Company 600 Day Hill Road, Windsor, CT 06095 USA 800-232-4321 860-688-8361 Fax 860-688-0098 www.spencerturbine.com
Visit us at ACHEMA 2012 - Stand D81 in Hall 9.0 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, June 18-22.
Circle 50 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-50
46 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
MAGNETROL Do your high-pressure vessel environments get you steamed? Rely on
the Eclipse Model 705 for liquid level detection that delivers precise
When things get hot, depend on SIL 3 Certified Eclipse Model 705
and Magnetrol, the level control experts. www.magnetrol.com
1-800-624-8765 info@magnetrol.com
1-800-624-8765 info@magnetrol.com
Circle 35 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-35
Feature Report
Engineering Practice
Reboiler
seal loss
Condensate
stripper
bottoms
Andr Bernard To debutanizer From C3
NOVA Chemicals (Canada) Ltd. Deethanizer rerun tower
bottoms
A
variety of performance problems
FIGURE 1. Shown here is a schematic process low diagram of the depropanizer
can arise in distillation towers and its ancillaries
during startup. Many are caused
by equipment, hardware or pro- water, are also known to cause prob- are effective and the least invasive to
cess conditions. Hardware issues may lems during distillation, or in some process operations. Specifically, the use
be related to instrumentation, tower cases may result in pressure surges. of diagrams that define the tray-stabil-
internals or ancillaries. Instrumenta- Meanwhile, oxygen-freeing prac- ity limits and expected operating lines,
tion malfunctions are also common tices, and methodologies to intro- and support effective startup planning,
during startup and are predominantly duce the feed stream can lead to cold can help to demystify the analysis of
related to liquid level indicators, on- temperatures that are below the mini- poor tower performance.
line analysis of key components and in mum allowable temperature of the This article illustrates the use of
some cases, flowmeters. If not properly piping or tower material. Unstable these practical tools through a trouble-
compensated, flowmeters can mislead thermosyphon or reboiler stalling, shooting exercise with a depropanizer
the operator on streams operating caused by low loads or prema- tower at NOVA Chemicals Corunna
outside the normal design envelope. ture start of the reboiler, can also site. The Corunna site is an olefins
Vessel-isolation blinds, valve align- cause tower instability. Similarly, plant with a front-end crude unit
ments or unexpected obstructions in tray or packing hydraulic loads and a back-end aromatics unit. The
valves can also restrict or misdirect that are outside the equipment ca- plant has the flexibility to crack naph-
flows. Any of these issues could lead to pability can significantly impact tha and heavy atmospheric gas oil
hazardous conditions and ultimately fractionation efficiency by allowing (HAGO), produced by the crude unit.
process incidents. either flooding or operation It also has the capability of cracking
Anomalies in tower internals, such below turndown. natural gas liquids (NGLs).
as obstructions, mechanical damage Although some of these problems ul-
or poor installation can also cause timately require the process to be shut Depropanizer description
towers to perform poorly. Meanwhile, down so that the tower can be inspected The depropanizer is a 147-ft tower
issues related to process conditions internally, that should be the last re- with a diameter of 7.5 ft and a total of
could arise in all operations conducted sort. Good startup planning and pro- 62 trays. The first 33 trays (from the
from the point of shutdown to getting cedures can go a long way toward pre- top) are conventional two-pass sieve
the tower ready for startup, during venting operating problems in the first trays. Trays 34 to 62 are high-capacity
the startup itself, and ultimately dur- place. If problems do arise, appropriate trays. Heat is supplied to the bottom
ing steady-state operation. The pres- knowledge of the system is essential for reboiler by low-pressure steam. Pro-
ence of unexpected impurities, such as identifying the corrective actions that pylene refrigeration (3C) provides
48 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Liquid reinjection CGC = Charge gas compressor NOMENCLATURE
Condensate stripper PFO = Pyrolysis fuel oil
RPG = Raw pyrolysis gasoline AE = Pipe-equivalent slot area, ft2
AD = Pipe-equivalent of downcomer
H2 CH 4
Acid C2 area, ft2
gas Fractionator
Ah = Hole area, ft2
Charge Chill aD = Downcomer area, ft2
Quench gas
Charge area
train C = Constant given by Equation (9)
dryer
gas Cv = Discharge coefficient, unitless
CGC Deq = Equivalent diameter, ft
PFO RPG Liquid Acetylene F1 = Factor, equivalent to unity
dryer
Water and
converters (F1 = 1) for most tower larger
condensed
Demethanizer than 4 ft in diameter [6]
hydrocarbons F2 = Factor given by Equation (11)
(1st three stages) g = Gravitational acceleration,
32.2 ft/s2
Condensed
Condensate Deethanizer K1 = Constant (0 for sieve deck)
hydrocarbons
(4th and 5th stages) Stripper K2 = Dry pressure drop coefficient,
in./(ft/s)2
KC = Number of velocity head lost
C3 + to C3+ to
depropanizer depropanizer
LD = Downcomer liquid rate, lb/h
lD = Downcomer length, ft
Nslot = Number of downcomer slots
FIGURE 2. This low diagram shows the liquid re-injection mode and condensate P1 = Lower tray pressure,
stripper operating mode in. of liquid
P2 = Upper tray pressure,
Rectifying section Stripping section in. of liquid
(2-pass sieve trays) (high-capacity trays) PD = Downcomer pressure drop, in.
of liquid
1 55
PT = Tray deck pressure drop, in. of
2
56 liquid
3 V = Total vapor rate, lb/h
4 57 VD = Downcomer vapor rate, lb/h
5 (VD)cr = Downcomer critical vapor rate,
58
6 lb/h
7 59 VT = Tray vapor rate, lb/h
8 = Pipe friction factor, unitless
9
60 n = Fraction of VD flowing to the
61
downcomer n
10
V = Vapor density, lb/ft3
11
62 L = Liquid density, lb/ft3
12
13
the depropanizer overhead product.
14
Feed to Tray 39 is cooled against cool-
15
15A ing water. Without cooling, the feed
Relative density would enter the tower with a signifi-
Relative density cant vapor fraction, which would shift
Startup condition
Normal rates the tray loads from the stripping to
the rectifying section.
FIGURE 3. This gamma scan of the depropanizer compares normal operating load
From a startup standpoint, the liq-
to the startup conditions
uid re-injection configuration (Figure
cooling to the overhead condenser. pressors 4th and 5th stage are dried 2), offers two advantages. First, given
As shown in Figure 1, the tower has in liquid dryers and can either be pro- the low feedrate during startup, this
two main feed points at Tray 34 and cessed by the condensate stripper or arrangement provides more load on
Tray 39. The feed is distributed by mixed with dry charge gas, upstream the deethanizer and depropanizer,
trough distributors at those locations. of the chill train (liquid re-injection which helps in meeting turndown. Sec-
A third minor feed point, which accom- path [1]). Re-injection of this liquid ond, the movement of material from
modates a small recycle stream from stream to the charge gas enhances the front to the back end of the plant is
the C3 rerun tower is located on Tray condensation in the first propylene sequential. As such, the depropanizer
22. The tower normally receives feed chiller. Process loads are then reduced does not see any feed until the deetha-
from the deethanizer bottoms at Tray in the chill train but increased in the nizer has been inventoried. The plant
34 and the condensate stripper bottoms deethanizer and depropanizer. is therefore normally started with the
at Tray 39. External C4s can be pro- In the liquid re-injection configu- liquid re-injection configuration.
cessed from time to time and are mixed ration, the depropanizer is entirely
with the condensate-stripper feed. The fed from the deethanizer bottom. Be- Depropanizer startup problems
olefins unit has the ability to run with cause of nozzle size and distributor Sequence of events. Feed from the
or without the condensate stripper. limitations the feed is split between deethanizer to the depropanizer
As shown in Figure 2, condensed hy- Tray 34 and Tray 39. Tray 34 feed is started ramping up roughly 15 h
drocarbons from the charge-gas com- cooled through cross exchange with after the charge gas compressor was
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 49
TABLE 1. PRE- AND POST-SHUTDOWN OPERATING CONDITIONS
Pre-shutdown Post-shutdown
FIGURE 4. This diagram shows the high-capacity trays oper- FIGURE 5. Typical downcomer arrangements for conventional
ating limits, with the pre-shutdown and startup operating points and high capacity trays are shown here. The downcomer posi-
tive seal is shown on (A) and (B), while the downcomer dy-
namic seal is shown on (C)
er DD 45 elbow 0.2
om
nc DD Straight lD/DD
w
Do length
Vapor DD Exit 1
flow path
Engineering Practice
element for bringing the ethylene FIGURE 7. This igure Tray operating window
shows the post-event minimum vapor rate
product within specification. analysis of a tray-stability
diagram Tray deck
Corrective actions seal point
The troubleshooting exercise de-
Liquid rate, lb/h
scribed above revealed that the high-
capacity trays downcomers were not
sealed. It was also believed that, since 1 2 3 4 5 6
a fair chunk of vapor was flowing
through the downcomers, not enough Gamma
was left to seal the tray deck. As a scan
vapor rate 57
47
58
Operating line Better
overlap 48
at time of scan 59
between
Minimum vapor rate normal 49
60
and
startup 50
61
Tray deck
seal point 51
62
Liquid rate, lb/h
!
52 Gap
C3s trending up between
53 normal
Downcomer and
backup 54 startup
Downcomer critical
Vapor rate, lb/h
Startup condition
Normal rates
Minimum vapor rate FIGURE 10. This gamma scan shows a suspected entrainment of liq-
uids on startup from the bottom trays to trays 45, 47, 48 and 49
Tray deck
seal point ADn. n can then be deter- the critical downcomer vapor velocity
Liquid rate, lb/h mined using Equation (6): limit. Figure 7 also includes the mini-
mum stable liquid and vapor rate ob-
FIGURE 9. This igure shows the oper- (6)
tained from the tray vendor.
ating data (of the critical vapor-rate and
tray seal-point) on the stability diagram The ratio of Equation (3) and Equa- Key process variables applied on
for the different periods described on tion (5) provides the relationship be- the depropanizer are plotted against
Figure 8. Uncorrected data (red dashed tween VT and VD. time (Figure 8). The tower pressure is
curves), and data corrected for 20% re- not plotted, as it remained relatively
duction in the perforation area (red solid
curves) are shown
constant throughout this period. For
(7) simplicity of presentation, the time
Assuming even distribution within scale starts at 0 hour just before the
one downcomer, the total downcomer C3 analyzer started reading.
vapor flow, VD, was divided by the (8) The plot is subdivided in time in-
total number of slots and multiplied terval periods, where Periods 1, 2, 3,
by factor 1, as described by Equation Where: 4 and 6 show the C3 composition in
(5A). Factor 1 represents the fraction the bottom of the depropanizer trend-
of VD flowing to a single downcomer. ing down. Period 5 represents the
AE represents the pipe-equivalent slot conditions sustained during the
area, based on the slot-equivalent di- (9) gamma scan.
ameter. The pressure drop from vapor Using plant data, the bottom tray
exiting the downcomer can be calcu- Using the value of VT, the tray-deck load was calculated from the tower
lated from Equation (5B). The total seal limit was determined from the bottom product and low-pressure (LP)
downcomer pressure drop can be ob- correlation in Ref. [4, 5]. The down- steam flowmeters. The actual bottom-
tained by the summation of Equations comer critical vapor rate was deter- tray vapor rate was estimated by
(5A) and (5B). mined by Equation (10). multiplying the ratio of the simulated
bottom-tray vapor to LP steam rate by
(5) the actual measured rate of LP steam
(10) to the reboiler. The liquid load of the
bottom tray was estimated by adding
F1 = 1 and F2 is given by: the above calculated vapor rate to the
actual tower bottoms flowrate.
(5a) The data were segregated by peri-
ods, as shown in Figure 8, and plotted
(11)
on two stability diagrams. The first
Where LD is assumed equal to L. diagram in Figure 9 shows the data
(5b) The stability diagram, as shown in selected for the time when the depro-
Figure 7, is built by plotting the total panizer bottom C3 composition was
Writing the above equations for each vapor and liquid rate corresponding to trending down and also includes the
downcomer will provide correspon- the seal deck limits established from gamma scan time interval. The bot-
dence between the fraction of VD (ex- Prince and Chans correlation. The tom diagram plots the data for which
pressed by n, where n = downcomer total vapor and liquid rate correspond- the depropanizers bottom C3 composi-
number) and the pipe-equivalent area ing to Equation (10) and (11) provides tion was trending up.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 53
Engineering Practice
Subsequent startup
An unplanned outage occurred within
a few weeks from the above startup. Visit us at ACHEMA
Again, during this period, no work or Booth C20 Hall 6
18 - 22 June
vessel entry was done on the depro-
panizer. The same startup procedure
and feed slates were followed again on
the plant restart. However, additional
steps were added on the procedure to
ensure feed cooling and reflux maxi-
mization on the depropanizer.
Proper feed locations and transi- Innovations for a better world.
tion between operating modes was
re-emphasized. The tower was started
on liquid-reinjection mode and tran-
Circle 8 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-08
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 55
Downcomer Transition zone
backup Operating line
Engineering Practice Downcomer critical
Circle 13 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-13
56 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Tower inspection
More than two years after this inci-
dent, the depropanizer was opened
and inspected during a scheduled
plant turnaround. The inspection re-
vealed no mechanical anomalies. The
FIGURE 13. Shown here is photographic proof of the reduced effective hole diam-
sieve trays in the rectifying section
eter on the depropanizers high-capacity trays located in the stripping section
were found to be clean.
condensate-stripper operating mode. until the condensate stripper bot- However, in the stripping section,
Plant data suggest that the downcom- tom stream is fully operational. This a thin layer of polymer was found on
ers were sealed prior to the transition. will temporarily affect the tower ef- the surface of the tray. The polymer
An inappropriate feed-lineup sequence ficiency, but will ensure a smooth was hard and strongly bonded to the
is believed to have caused significant transition and prevent unsealing metal surface (Figure 13), coating the
liquid entrainment at the feed point, the downcomers. circumference of the holes and reduc-
which caused the downcomers of the The deethanizer is also equipped ing each holes effective area.
trays below that feed point to empty with high-capacity trays. Process work The post-event analyses described
out. At that time, the operating point done around startup conditions high- earlier suggested a 20% reduction of
was above the critical vapor rate, and lighted conditions required to satisfy the perforation area. This represents
tray stability could only be re-estab- the minimum liquid limit on the ven- a reduction in diameter of around 1/16
lished by reducing the tray load. The dor-specified tray operating window. in. for 1/2-in. holes, or equivalent to a
deethanizer bottom stream, which The tower load ramped up smoothly layer of approximately 1/32 in. cover-
feeds the depropanizer at the same lo- from below the minimum liquid limit ing the circumference of each hole. The
cation as the condensate stripper bot- to a point within the tray window. As polymer was scraped off a small area
tom stream, should not be switched to such, the downcomers critical vapor of the tray deck to highlight the poly-
the other deethanizer bottom stream rate limit has never been a concern. mer layer covering the circumference
of the holes, which is illustrated on the in fractionation. drop and poor fractionation, is a strong
left side of Figure 13. The un-scraped However, a reduction or loss of frac- indicator of unsealed downcomers.
area in the same picture would sug- tionation itself, even though symptom- The use of a tray-stability diagram
gest little fouling at first sight. How- atic, is not sufficient to conclude that a could replace the need for a gamma
ever, the polymer coating over the tray loss of downcomer seal has occurred. scan. However, as demonstrated with
also covered the circumference of all Flooding will also cause a significant the depropanizer example, certain
the holes with a layer thickness more reduction in fractionation. These two conditions like fouling could mislead
or less similar to the one displayed on operational anomalies can be distin- the investigators, where a gamma
the scraped area. The fouling was more guished by differences in tower pres- scan would provide the missing link
severe on some trays, as shown on the sure drop. In general, a loss of down- for proper diagnosis.
right-end side of Figure 13. On aver- comer seal will be associated with low In summary, the loss of a downcomer
age most of the trays had a reduction tower pressure drop, while high pres- seal is very likely if:
in hole area of approximately 20%. sure drop is indicative of flooding. Poor or no fractionation is observed
The combination of poor fraction- The tower has low pressure drop
Downcomer seal-loss symptoms ation and low pressure drop suggests Operating points are outside the
When downcomers become unsealed, unsealed downcomers but could also tray-stability diagram, and
a significant portion of the vapor flows be the result of mechanical anoma- The gamma scan is showing little to
through the downcomer and bypasses lies, such as tray manways left open no froth and doesnt show signs of
the active area of the tray. Depending or damaged tray panels. Gamma scan any mechanical anomalies
on the extent, there might not be suf- of the tower will help in ruling out me-
ficient vapor flowing across the tray chanical anomalies and will provide Re-establish a downcomer seal
deck to prevent weeping or dumping additional information with regard to It is one thing to recognize unsealed
of liquids. As such, little contact oc- flooding. For instance, a scan showing downcomers, but quite another to im-
curs between vapor and liquid, which very little froth and no mechanical plement a suitable remedy. Any situ-
is evidenced by a significant reduction anomalies, along with low pressure ation where one tower is incapable of
Circle 17 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-17
Circle 1 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-01
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 59
Feature Report
Engineering Practice
Outlet
A
gas flare is an elevated vertical Flare boom-1
conveyance found accompany- Bridge-1
ing oil wells, gas wells, drilling Bridge-2
Flare tip 3
rigs, petroleum refineries, chem- Flare boom-2 Flare tip 2
ical plants, natural gas plants and so
on. Although modern flare systems FIGURE 1. This diagram
are specifically designed to reduce shows the computational
the thermal radiation, pollution and domain used for the CFD
acoustic impact of a flare, a consider- analysis presented in the
text. A close up of the three
able amount of radiation is neverthe- flares is also shown
less emitted by an operational flare as
a result of burning large quantities of
combustible gases. The emitted radia-
tion increases the temperature of the combustible gases. Therefore, correct ages are available for predicting the
flare support structure and nearby estimation of the predicted tempera- radiation intensity around a flare, only
structures. Therefore, it is essential to ture is very difficult unless a detailed CFD takes account of the geometrical
correctly estimate heat transfer from mathematical modeling of the entire aspects, process variables, ambient air
the flares to the structures when de- system is carried out. direction and temperature, combus-
signing structures, selecting their ma- Computational fluid dynamics tion reactions and all modes of heat
terials of construction (MoC), selecting (CFD) is the best tool to model such a transfer in a 3D domain to accurately
protective paints and so on. system, incorporating all of the com- predict temperature of structures as-
Flare vendors sometimes provide plexities to predict how flares will sociated with flare systems, and thus
temperature data on structures vis-- perform under realistic operating con- eliminates the uncertainties associ-
vis distances from the flare tip based ditions with respect to different wind ated with designing those structures.
on predictions from their proprietary speed and direction. This is generally In the current study, a comprehen-
software, experimental data or cor- not possible with less-sophisticated sive CFD analysis combining the ef-
relations. In most of the cases, these software packages. fects of fluid flow, combustion and
predictions are based on two-dimen- This article presents a CFD analy- heat transfer including radiation
sional (2D) planes, and detailed tem- sis for predicting the temperatures has been carried out for an off-
perature data on three-dimensional of neighboring structures of flares. shore oil-and-gas process complex
(3D) geometries of the structures are Designing structures associated with having multiple flares, handling dif-
not available. flares is traditionally done based on ferent gas compositions and mass
In reality, the temperature of a flare industry practices. However, this may flowrates. The adopted methodology
support structure and the surround- lead to over- or under-designing of the is generic in nature and applicable to
ing structures depends on several structures depending on the antici- any flare system that may be present
factors, such as the ambient air veloc- pated temperature of the structures in any plant in the chemical process
ity and direction, the geometry of the when flares are under full load opera- industries (CPI).
flare tip and the composition of the tion. Although several software pack- Four cases were studied for four
60 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
a. Case I b. Case II
FIGURE 2. The
influence of the
wind direction
and velocity can
be seen in the
temperature path
lines for the four
c. Case III d. Case IV cases discussed
in the text
different ambient conditions involv- the combustible components of the dif- ploys two partial differential equa-
ing two wind directions and two wind ferent gases were converted to equiva- tions to estimate the velocity length
speeds to find out the maximum tem- lent methane and a single-step meth- scales of turbulence:
perature of the structures under full- ane-combustion reaction (CH4 + 2O2 =
load operation of flares. Steady-state CO2 + 2H2O) was modeled using eddy
t
( k ) +
xj
u j k( )
heat-transfer analyses were carried dissipation model. Radiation was mod-
out using a general-purpose, commer- eled using the P1 model. The ideal gas ( l + t ) k (3)
cial CFD code. To take care of the ef- law is used to determine density as a = P +
x j k x j
fects of convective and radiative heat function of temperature. Heat trans-
transfer from flares to the structures, fer from the structural members to
combustion and radiation were also
modeled. All of the combustible com-
the ambient is modeled by providing
a wall heat-transfer coefficient and t
( ) +
xj
(
u j )
ponents of the different gases were ambient temperature. Four different
converted to equivalent methane, and cases were studied involving two wind P 2 ( l + t )
= C 1 C 2 +
a single-step methane-oxidation reac- directions and two wind speeds. k k x j k x j
tion was modeled to limit the number
of species present in the domain. The Mathematical model (4)
maximum temperature of the flames Gas phase equations. The steady- In the above two equations, P repre-
was predicted to be around 1,900C. state continuity and momentum equa- sents the production term given by
Also, it will be shown that even at tion of the gas phase are given as Equation (5).
full load operation and for the most Equations (1) and (2). The source term,
adverse ambient conditions, tempera- Sp, results from combustion. The com- u u j 2 U m ij u j 2
P = t i + k ij
ture for the support structures and ponent of velocity in coordinate direc- x j xi 3 xm x j 3
the connecting bridges would be well tion x is given in Equation (2), which
within the maximum allowable limit includes pressure, gravitational force (5)
of structural steel. (buoyancy effects), and the general- The energy equation used to solve for
ized source term. Equations for the y enthalpy is given by Equation (6). The
Analysis approach and z components are similar. source term, Sh, in the energy equa-
In the current study, CFD analyses tion includes combustion and radia-
are carried out for an offshore oil-
xi
( u i ) = S p tion heat-transfer rates:
and-gas process complex having three (1)
h
flares. These flares are disposed to at-
xi
( i h ) = h
xi xi
+ Sh
mosphere through tripods. The 3D do- p ij (6)
main are comprised of the two flare tri-
xj
( )
ui u j = +
xi c j
+ gi + Fi + S p
pods and the interconnecting bridges. Owing to a higher temperature of the
Steady-state heat-transfer analyses (2) flame, radiation is the predominant
were carried out using a general- mode of heat transfer from the flame
purpose, commercial CFD code con- Model for turbulence. The model to the structures. In the current model-
sidering a rectangular computational employed in the present simulation ing, radiation has been modeled using
domain. Although the three flares are is the standard k- model proposed a commercial code. In the commercial
supposed to burn different gases, all by Launder and Spalding. This em- radiation model, radiation flux (qr) is
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 61
Engineering Practice
defined by Equation (7), as follows: product species, YR is the mass frac- Boundary conditions
tion of a particular reactant, A is an The following boundary conditions
qr = aG 4 an 2 T 4
(7) empirical constant equal to 4.0 and B were used for performing the CFD
is an empirical constant equal to 0.5. analyses:
Where G is the incident radiation, a In Equations (8) and (9), the chemi- 1. The mass-flow inlet boundary con-
is the absorption coefficient, n is the cal reaction rate is governed by the dition was used at the air inlet cor-
refractive index of the medium and large-eddy mixing time scale, k/. responding to air velocity of 15 knots
is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Combustion proceeds whenever tur- (7.6 m/s).
The expression for radiation flux can bulence is present (k/ > 0), and an 2. The ambient air temperature was
be directly substituted into the energy ignition source is not required to ini- taken as 300K.
equation to account for heat sources tiate combustion. 3. The pressure outlet boundary condi-
(or sinks) due to radiation. tion was specified as zero gauge pres-
Fuel combustion has been modeled Modeling and meshing sure at the outlet boundaries.
using the eddy dissipation model. Geometry modeling and meshing 4. The side walls and lower wall of
Combustion of methane is rapid and are carried out using a commercial computational domain are modeled as
the combustion is said to be mixing- CAD (computer aided design) tool. free slip walls.
controlled, hence chemical kinetic The model consists of a rectangular 5. The mass flow inlet boundary con-
rates can be safely neglected. The domain (420 m 300 m 145 m) as ditions used at the tips of the three
commercial code provides a turbu- shown in Figure 1. Bridges and flare flares are as follows:
lence-chemistry interaction model support structures have been mod- Flare tip 1: 7 kg/s
(eddy dissipation model), based on the eled at their respective locations Flare tip 2: 17 kg/s
work of Magnussen and Hjertager [1]. considering only the main load-bear- Flare tip 3: 146 kg/s
The net rate of production of species ing members. This domain has been 6. The wall heat-transfer coefficient
due to reaction r, Ri,r, is given by the aligned with the wind direction. At was calculated by Morgan co-relation,
smaller (that is, the limiting value) of the lower side, the domain boundary which was used to model the convec-
the two expressions below, Equations has been considered at a distance of tive heat transfer.
(8) and (9). 7 m from the bottom of the bridges. 7. The structural elements were mod-
YR Close-up views of the flares along eled as thin surfaces with a thickness
Ri ,r = i,r M w,i A min R with the inclined support structures of zero.
k R ,r M w, R
(8) are shown as insets to Figure 1. The
geometry has been meshed using Case studies
pY p a combination of structured (hexa- A total of four different cases have
Ri ,r = i,r M w ,i AB
k N j ,r M w, j hedral) and unstructured (tetrahe- been studied for four different ambi-
j
(9) dral) elements with total number of ent conditions. The objective is to as-
Where Yp is the mass fraction of any volume elements as 2.7 million. certain the maximum possible tem-
62 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
FIGURE 4.
The tempera-
tures of the
supporting
structure is
shown here for
Case I. Temper-
atures at dis-
creet points for
Cases IIV are
summarized in
Table 1
Temperature, C
Validation of results FIGURE 5. This
150
Owing to limited or non-existing graph plots the tem-
perature variation
availability of actual field data, it is along the boom 100
very difficult to validate results for length predicted by
this analysis. However, it has been at- a flare-modeling
tempted to compare the CFD analysis software for a past 50
project
results with data from some past proj-
ects for comparable mass flowrates of 0
the combustible gas as given below: 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
CFD predicted maximum tempera- Structure elevation, m
Comprehensive Expertise
ITS EASY TO
Experience the variety of our high grade steel CONTROL NOISE with SoundPLANs
solutions at the ACHEMA 2012. noise evaluation and mapping software
Spun Castings
HAVE NOISE PROBLEMS? Whether its where workers
Static Castings ur
out o need hearing protection or overall city noise management,
Investment Castings more ab
to learn lopments:
Join us l d e ve SoundPLAN helps you solve your noise issues.
Services: teria
new ma Mo
Machining and Welding, oy G 45
Centrall G 21-02 As the global leader in noise modeling software, we deliver:
Research and Development, a ll o y
Centr Fast data processing
Metallurgical Consulting,
Project Management and many more Superb documentation & graphics
High Grade Special Steels Highly accurate results
Duplex and Super-Duplex
Ni-based Alloys
SoundPLANs software
Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
Edelstahlwerk Kaiserau is available in many languages with expert
Kaiserau 2, 51789 Lindlar, Germany ACHEMA local support in 48 countries.
Phone: +49 2266 92-0 18 22 June 2012
Fax: +49 2266 92-370 Frankfurt am Main/ Call or download our FREE demo
Germany
www.schmidt-clemens.com Hall / Booth 11.0 / C43 +1 360 432 9840 www.soundplan.com
Circle 46 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-46 Circle 49 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-49
64 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
Tushar P. Bhad is an assistant
manager, Hydrocarbon IC, R&D,
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (Mum-
bai 400072, India at Larsen &
comes time consuming References Tourbo Ltd. Mumbai, India;
Email: tushar_bhad@lntenc.
There is a limited availability of ex- 1. Improving the Safety Standard of an Offshore com). He has over three years
Platform, Fluent News Letter, Spring 2001. of experience in the area of CFD
perimental and field data for flares, modeling of thermal and fluid
2. Stephen Ferguson, Computer Flow Simulation
which makes validation of results Provides New Insight into Hurricane-resis- systems having various appli-
tant Platform Design, Exploration & Produc- cations involving modeling of
rather difficult tion: The Oil & Gas Review 2006. multi-phase flow, turbulence,
combustion and heat transfer. At present his areas
3. ANSYS Fluent user manual. of interest include fluid flow, heat transfer, and mod-
Broader applications eling of multi-phase flow, combustion and radiation
The methodology adopted to carry out modeling using CFD. He has published papers in the
Authors CFD conferences and jointly filed for an Indian Pat-
the current study is generic in nature ent in the year 2010. Bhad is a post graduate thermal
Arvind Kaushik is senior engineer from WCE Sangli, India.
and the same steps can be followed to deputy general manager
(R&D) at Larsen & Toubro Sumanta Sarkar is deputy general manager
perform CFD analysis of any flare sys- (R&D) at Larsen & Toubros Hydrocarbon IC
Ltd. (Email: arvind_kaushik@
tem and associated structures for any lntenc.com). He has over 23 (Email: sumanta_sarkar@lntenc.com). He is a post
years of experience in the graduate (M. Tech.) chemical
chemical process plant, refinery, oil- design of thermal equipment, engineer from ITT, Kharagpur,
and-gas production facility and so on. process optimization, en- and has 17 years of experience
ergy conservation in process in the areas of CFD analysis,
The same modeling technique is ap- plants, dynamic simulation design & rating of thermal
plicable to predict temperature around of process and power plants, equipment and systems, opera-
commissioning and trouble- tion, technical services, project
any hot gas stack, for example fluegases shooting in India and overseas. He leads a team execution, feasibility studies
of mechanical and chemical engineers in the and technology evaluation.
from incinerators, furnace stack, DG set His current areas of interest
Thermal Engineering Group of R&D for inno-
stack and so on. However, this would vations in design of waste heat recovery equip- are troubleshooting and design
ment. His areas of interest include solar thermal analysis of fluid & thermal
not require modeling of the complex energy, low temperature thermal desalination, systems through CFD modeling, involving multu-
combustion reactions since the fluegas thermal energy storage systems, dynamic simu- phase flow, turbulence, reaction and heat transfer
lation of power plants, energy optimization of with combustion and radiation. He is a recipient of
composition and the temperature data industrial processes and commissioning and the Outstanding Young Chemical Engineer Award
are often made available by the vendor trouble-shooting of process equipment. Kaushik (IIChE) in 2007 and has published several papers
is a post graduate (M.Tech) chemical engineer in various CFD forums in India and abroad. He
or designer of the combustion system. from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT; Kan- has jointly filed for an Indian Patent for Horizontal
pur, India), since 1990. Heat Recovery Unit in the year 2010.
Edited by Gerald Ondrey
HTRI Xchanger Suite is an integrated,
easy-to-use suite of tools that delivers
accurate design calculations for
shell-and-tubeheatexchangers
jacketedpipeheatexchangers
hairpinheatexchangers
plate-and-frameheatexchangers
spiralplateheatexchangers
firedheaters
aircoolers
economizers
tubelayouts
vibrationanalysis
www.htri.net
*Service Pack 3 includes functionality to load and convert files from Honeywells UniSimDesignShell-TubeExchangerModelerfiles(.STEI),aswellaslegacyHTFSandAspenShell&TubeExchanger
(.TAIand.EDR)files.HoneywellandUniSimaretrademarksofHoneywellInternational,Inc.HTFSandAspenShell&TubeExchanger are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc. HTRI, the
HTRIlogo,theH2logo,WerechangingthefutureofheattransferandXchangerSuitearetrademarksofHeatTransferResearch,Inc.Thesemarksmayberegisteredinsomecountries.
Circle 28 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-28
Feature Report
Engineering Practice
C
ompressible flow in pipes is common in the chemical
process industries (CPI) and is typically associated resistances of fittings)
with density changes in gases that are subjected to
pressure variations. Gas flow conditions can be de-
scribed using an adiabatic or isothermal flow equation.
G
For conservative piping design, the isothermal model is fa- Pa Pb D
Ta =Tb
vored, but it overpredicts mass flux through pipes. Ta Tb
The conventional isothermal model is relatively simple
and more applicable to long, uninsulated pipelines. Flow
conditions in long pipes and the flow of fluids with a low N , 4fL/D + K
specific heat ratio (~1.0) are approximately isothermal. The
temperature of the fluid is essentially constant and equal FIGURE 1. Parameters for typical isothermal flow of ideal
to the originating station temperature. gases in pipes include friction and fitting losses
The homogeneous equilibrium model improved (HEMI)
for pipe flows, developed by Kim and Dunsheath to better ac- Isothermal pipe flows
count for the change in density along the entire pipe length The novel isothermal pipe flow equation described in this
has been presented for all fluids [1]. Kim and Dunsheath article better represents the nature of isothermal pipe flow.
noted that the term dP within the flow equation would re- Typical isothermal flow of ideal gases in a pipe with fric-
sult in somewhat higher mass flux than would be expected. tion is shown in Figure 1. An ideal gas is one that obeys the
This finding can be applied to the isothermal flow equation equation of state for ideal gases. The compressibility fac-
of ideal gases by manipulating the Bernoulli equation. tor (Z) of ideal gases is 1. The overall loss coefficient (N)
This article describes a novel isothermal pipe flow equa- includes pipe friction losses, in terms of 4fL/D, as well as
tion that better represents the properties of gas flow in all fitting losses of K. The loss coefficient of a frictional ele-
a pipe and yields more accurate predictions of mass flux. ment can be included either as the equivalent length or the
The article also compares the calculation results of the two number of velocity heads. The temperature for isothermal
isothermal equations (novel versus conventional) using an flow is constant across the entire pipe length, and flow at
example piping system. The newly derived, isothermal flow constant temperature is very convenient to model. Eleva-
equation presented here is called the novel isothermal tion changes in pipelines can be neglected if gas densities
pipe flow equation for ideal gases (to differentiate it from are relatively small. In the problems presented here, there
the conventional isothermal pipe flow equation). are no elevation changes for horizontal pipes (Figure 1).
One of the reasons for the preferential use of the isother-
mal flow equation, as compared to the adiabatic equation, Conventional equation
is that the mass flux predictions are conservative. How- The designer of pipe flow systems favors an isothermal pipe
ever, inappropriate calculations of average density using flow equation because it is simple and conservative. There
the conventional isothermal equation leads to non-conser- are numerous isothermal equations, but all are analogous
vative results, in terms of piping design. These results can to Equation (1) [211]. The mass flux (G) is determined from
lead to piping systems that lack the capacity to handle the the calculated value of G2. The choking conditions set a
mass flow. The novel isothermal equation yields more con- limit on the maximum pipe mass flux for a given set of pipe
servative results and correctly sized piping systems. flow conditions. This means that lowering the pipe outlet
66 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012
3,000 3 3,000 3
Mass flux, kg/m2-s 2,500 G 2.5 2,500 G 2.5
Mach number
Mach number
2,000 Mach No. 2 2,000 Mach No. 2
1,500 1.5 1,500 1.5
1,000 1 1,000 1
500 0.5 500
0.5
0 0 0 0
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
Pb/Pa Pb/Pa
FIGURE 2. Mass flux predictions with the conventional iso- FIGURE 3. With the same piping system and inlet conditions
thermal flow equation tend to be higher because the equation as in Figure 2, the novel isothermal equation yields a smaller
does not correctly account for gas density changes mass flux
pressure does not increase the mass flux. The choked mass 1,200 9
0 2
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
(2)
Pb/Pa
FIGURE 5. Split-
and kinetic losses. ting the pipe from
On the other hand, the novel isothermal flow equation is one segment (top
obtained using the average density for friction losses and diagram) into two N=5
the average density for kinetic losses using Equations (5) segments (two-step
and (6), respectively. Applying the arithmetic average den- pipe flow; bottom
diagram) can help G1 G2
sity for the friction losses is appropriate because the inte- Pb
determine which Pa P1
gration is based on N (pipe length), not on pressure. How- equation version is Ta = T1 T1 = Tb Tb
Ta T1
ever, the arithmetic average density for the kinetic losses better for a particu-
is not appropriate here because the integration is based lar case
N =5 N =0
nificantly decrease, which in turn increases the pressure using Equation (1) or (4) for N = 0. The calculated mass
drop. Using Equation (1) or Equation (4), the mass flux flux G2 should be greater than G1 if the flow equation
(G1) for the one-step pipe flow path from Pa (1,013,500 is correct, because there is a net driving force the dif-
Pa) to Pb (101,350 Pa) sketched in Figure 5 (top diagram) ference of the friction losses (P1 P2,) that causes
can be calculated. One can also calculate irreversible fric- greater mass flux than G1.
tional losses (P1) for the one-step flow path using Equa- Table 1 exhibits the calculation results for the two
tion (7). pipe-flow equations. For the conventional isothermal flow
equation, G2 is not greater than G1. This means that the
one-step pipe flow path from 1,013,500 to 101,350 Pa
(7) results in same mass flux, even though the irreversible
frictional losses are greater. The conventional isothermal
Another location for the equivalent mass flux shown in equation overpredicts mass flux. Note that the direction of
Figure 4 is located using Equation (1) or Equation (4) by the arithmetic average density is to overpredict mass flux.
changing Pb until the calculated mass flux equals G1. For In addition, two different irreversible frictional losses at
another flow-path case sketched in Figure 5 (bottom dia- the equivalent mass flux are contradictory. On the other
gram), the pipeline is split into two pipe segments. The hand, a novel isothermal flow equation gives a value of G2
first pipe segment from Pa to P1 is a frictional section. The that is greater than G1. This means that the novel isother-
second pipe segment from P1 to Pb is a non-frictional sec- mal pipe flow equation obeys the fundamental principles
tion. Irreversible frictional losses (P2) for the two-step of flow in pipes. Therefore, it is evident that the novel iso-
flow path can be calculated using Equation (7). The mass thermal equation represented by Equation (4) yields bet-
flux G2 for the non-frictional pipe section is calculated ter results than the conventional isothermal equation.
JUNE 2012
CHE.COM
Literature Review
Featuring Brochures and Catalogs of Products and Services for the CPI
Visit CE Lit Online
at che.com
(A-6)
(A-2)
Since and , Equation (A-2) can be Since and
written as:
(A-3)
,
Integrating Equation (A-3) between stations a and b Equation (A-6) can be written as:
gives:
(A-4)
(A-5)
References 8. Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and 10. Kern, R., How to Size Piping and Compo-
Pipe, Crane Technical Paper No. 410, 1988. nents as Gas Expands at Flow Conditions,
1. Kim, J.S. and Dunsheath, H.J., A Homoge- Chem. Eng., October, 1975, pp. 125132.
neous Equilibrium Model Improved for Pipe 9. Pressure-relieving and Depressuring Sys-
Flows, Proceedings of World Congress on tems, ANSI/API Standard 521, pp. 104110, 11. Walters, T., Gas-Flow Calculations: Dont
Engineering and Computer Science 2010 Vol. January 2007. Choke, Chem. Eng., January 2000, cover
II WCECS 2010, October 2022, San Fran- story.
cisco, pp. 733738, 2010.
2. Shapiro, A.H., The Dynamics and Thermody- Author
namics of Compressible Fluid Flow, Vol. 1,
The Ronald Press Company, New York, 1953. Jung Seob Kim is a senior Navneet R. Singh is a Se-
process engineer at SK E&C nior Process Engineer at
3. McCabe, W.L. and Smith, J.C., Unit Opera- USA Inc. (1401 Enclave Bayer CropScience LP (8400
tions of Chemical Engineering, McGraw- Parkway Suite 100, Houston, Hawthorne Road, Kansas
Hill, New York, 1976. TX 77077; Phone: 281-258- City, MO 64120; Phone : 816-
2619; Email: jkim3@sk.com) 242-2738; Email: navneet.
4. Crowl, D.A. and Louvar, J.F., Chemical Pro- where he is responsible for singh@bayer.com) where he
cess Safety: Fundamentals with Applica- designing petrochemical and is responsible for process de-
tions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., refinery plants. He has more sign, process modeling and
1990. than 25 years of experience emergency relief system de-
5. Saad, M.A., Compressible Fluid Flow, Pren- in different roles within the sign. He holds M.S. and Ph.D.
tice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1985. petrochemical process indus- degrees from Purdue Univer-
try including with Bayer Technology Services, sity and a B.S.Ch.E. degree from the Institute
6. Holland, F.A. and Bragg, R., Fluid Flow for Samsung BP Chemicals and Samsung Engineer- of Chemical Technology, Mumbai. He is a Senior
Chemical Engineers, Elsevier Inc., Amster- ing. He holds a B.S.Ch.E. from the University of member of AIChE and an engineer intern in the
dam, 1995. Seoul, is a member of AIChE, and is a registered State of West Virginia.
7. Green, D. and Perry, R.H., Perrys Chemical professional engineer in the State of Texas.
Engineers Handbook, McGraw-Hill, 2008.
SuperPro SchedulePro
Use SuperPro Designer to model, evaluate, and Migrate to SchedulePro to model, schedule,
optimize batch and continuous processes and debottleneck multi-product facilities
Easy production tracking, conflict Tracking demand for resources Managing inventories for input,
resolution and rescheduling (e.g., labor, materials, utilities, etc.) intermediate, and output materials
SuperPro Designer is a comprehensive process simulator that facilitates modeling, cost analysis, debottlenecking, cycle
time reduction, and environmental impact assessment of integrated biochemical, bio-fuel, fine chemical, pharmaceutical
(bulk & fine), food, consumer product, mineral processing, water purification, wastewater treatment, and related processes.
Its development was initiated at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). SuperPro is already in use at more than
500 companies and 900 universities around the globe (including 18 of the top 20 pharmaceutical companies and 9 of the top
10 biopharmaceutical companies).
SchedulePro is a versatile production planning, scheduling, and resource management tool. It generates feasible
production schedules for multi-product facilities that do not violate constraints related to the limited availability of equipment,
labor, utilities, and inventories of materials. It can be used in conjunction with SuperPro (by importing its recipes) or
independently (by creating recipes directly in SchedulePro). Any industry that manufactures multiple products by sharing
production lines and resources can benefit from the use of SchedulePro. Engineering companies use it as a modeling tool to
size shared utilities, determine equipment requirements, reduce cycle times, and debottleneck facilities.
RemoveTrampAd-ChemEng_Layout
Circle 242 on p. 761or1/30/12 5:
go to adlinks.che.com/ 40268-242
Remove CONTROL
Tramp Metals SYSTEMS
ProGrade Magnets Recipe-controlled systems
for all process applications!
Low Cost High Power
Continuous & batch processes
Plates from Hazardous & non-hazardous locations
$ 248 Fast design and start-up
Designed, built, installed and supported
by the process experts at Ross!
Grates from
$85 1-866-797-2660
Toll Free
Circle 244 on p. 76 or go to www.rosssyscon.com
adlinks.che.com/40268-244
9100
Metal Separator Circle 245 on p. 76 or go to
WABASH SELLS & RENTS adlinks.che.com/40268-245
Boilers Detects & Rejects:
20,000 - 400,000 #/Hr. - Aluminum - Steel
Diesel & Turbine Generators - Brass/Copper - Stainless
50 - 25,000 KW
Gears & Turbines
25 - 4000 HP
GET CONNECTED TODAY
We stock large inventories of:
Air Pre-Heaters Economizers Deaerators
Pumps Motors Fuel Oil Heating and Pump Sets
Valves Tubes Controls Compressors
Pulverizers Rental Boilers & Generators
www.che.com
24/7 Fast Emergency Service
800-704-2002
Liquid Coole
www.wabashpower.com call
wabash visit www.eriez.com
Fax: 512-213-4855
Email:
(952) 933-2559 info@xchanger.com
Circle 241 on p. 76 or go to
dhammes@accessintel.com Circle 247 on p. 76 or go to
adlinks.che.com/40268-241 adlinks.che.com/40268-247
JustFAXit! or go to www.che.com/adlinks
Fill out the form and circle or write in the number(s) go on the web and ill out the
below, cut it out, and fax it to 800-571-7730. online reader service card.
name Title
Company
address
City State/Province Zip/Postal Code
Country\ Telephone Fax
email | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FREE PRODUCT INFO 14 engineering, Design & Construc- 29 10 to 49 employees 47 Pollution Control equipment
(please answer all the questions) tion Firms 30 50 to 99 employees & Systems
15 engineering/environmental Ser- 31 100 to 249 employees 48 Pumps
YOUR INDUSTRY
vices 32 250 to 499 employees 49 Safety equipment & Services
01 Food & Beverages
16 equipment manufacturer 33 500 to 999 employees 50 Size reduction & agglomeration
02 wood, Pulp & Paper
17 energy incl. Co-generation 34 1,000 or more employees equipment
03 inorganic Chemicals
18 other YOU RECOMMEND, 51 Solids handling equipment
04 Plastics, Synthetic resins
JOB FUNCTION SPECIFY, PURCHASE 52 Tanks, Vessels, reactors
05 Drugs & Cosmetics (please circle all that apply)
20 Corporate management 53 Valves
06 Soaps & Detergents 40 Drying equipment
21 Plant operations incl. mainte- 54 engineering Computers/Soft-
07 Paints & allied Products 41 Filtration/Separation equipment
nance ware/Peripherals
08 organic Chemicals 42 heat Transfer/energy Conserva-
22 engineering 55 water Treatment Chemicals
09 agricultural Chemicals tion equipment
23 research & Development & equipment
10 Petroleum reining, 43 instrumentation & Control Sys-
24 Safety & environmental 56 hazardous waste management
Coal Products tems
26 other Systems
11 rubber & misc. Plastics 44 mixing, Blending equipment 57 Chemicals & raw materials
12 Stone, Clay, glass, Ceramics EMPLOYEE SIZE 45 motors, motor Controls 58 materials of Construction
13 metallurgical & metal Products 28 less than 10 employees 46 Piping, Tubing, Fittings 59 Compressors
1 16 31 46 61 76 91 106 121 136 151 166 181 196 211 226 241 256 271 286 301 316 331 346 361 376 391 406 421 436 451 466 481 496 511 526 541 556 571 586
2 17 32 47 62 77 92 107 122 137 152 167 182 197 212 227 242 257 272 287 302 317 332 347 362 377 392 407 422 437 452 467 482 497 512 527 542 557 572 587
3 18 33 48 63 78 93 108 123 138 153 168 183 198 213 228 243 258 273 288 303 318 333 348 363 378 393 408 423 438 453 468 483 498 513 528 543 558 573 588
4 19 34 49 64 79 94 109 124 139 154 169 184 199 214 229 244 259 274 289 304 319 334 349 364 379 394 409 424 439 454 469 484 499 514 529 544 559 574 589
5 20 35 50 65 80 95 110 125 140 155 170 185 200 215 230 245 260 275 290 305 320 335 350 365 380 395 410 425 440 455 470 485 500 515 530 545 560 575 590
6 21 36 51 66 81 96 111 126 141 156 171 186 201 216 231 246 261 276 291 306 321 336 351 366 381 396 411 426 441 456 471 486 501 516 531 546 561 576 591
7 22 37 52 67 82 97 112 127 142 157 172 187 202 217 232 247 262 277 292 307 322 337 352 367 382 397 412 427 442 457 472 487 502 517 532 547 562 577 592
8 23 38 53 68 83 98 113 128 143 158 173 188 203 218 233 248 263 278 293 308 323 338 353 368 383 398 413 428 443 458 473 488 503 518 533 548 563 578 593
9 24 39 54 69 84 99 114 129 144 159 174 189 204 219 234 249 264 279 294 309 324 339 354 369 384 399 414 429 444 459 474 489 504 519 534 549 564 579 594
10 25 40 55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205 220 235 250 265 280 295 310 325 340 355 370 385 400 415 430 445 460 475 490 505 520 535 550 565 580 595
11 26 41 56 71 86 101 116 131 146 161 176 191 206 221 236 251 266 281 296 311 326 341 356 371 386 401 416 431 446 461 476 491 506 521 536 551 566 581 596
12 27 42 57 72 87 102 117 132 147 162 177 192 207 222 237 252 267 282 297 312 327 342 357 372 387 402 417 432 447 462 477 492 507 522 537 552 567 582 597
13 28 43 58 73 88 103 118 133 148 163 178 193 208 223 238 253 268 283 298 313 328 343 358 373 388 403 418 433 448 463 478 493 508 523 538 553 568 583 598
14 29 44 59 74 89 104 119 134 149 164 179 194 209 224 239 254 269 284 299 314 329 344 359 374 389 404 419 434 449 464 479 494 509 524 539 554 569 584 599
15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 210 225 240 255 270 285 300 315 330 345 360 375 390 405 420 435 450 465 480 495 510 525 540 555 570 585 600
Advertiser Page number Advertiser Page number Advertiser Page number Advertiser Page number
Phone number Reader Service # Phone number Reader Service # Phone number Reader Service # Phone number Reader Service #
* International Edition See bottom of next page for advertising sales representatives' contact information
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 77
People
WHOS WHO
Archer Daniels Midland Co. keting and business development Steven Little becomes chair of the
(Decatur, Ill.) names Kyle James activities in the NAFTA region. department of chemical and petro-
general manager of glycols. leum engineering at the
Jim Rowland joins Watlow (St. University of Pittsburghs
Christian Lindenhayn joins Orion Louis, Mo.), a maker of thermal sys- (Pittsburgh, Pa.) Swanson School
Engineered Carbons (Kingwood, tems, as vice president of operations. of Engineering.
Tex.) as senior vice president of Meanwhile, Victoria Holt, president
the rubber business line. and CEO of Spartech (Clayton, Mo.), Dow Polyurethanes (Midland,
joins Watlows board of directors. Mich.) names Mark Bassett global
Jerry MacCleary becomes president vice president.
for the NAFTA region of Bayer Toray Plastics (America), Inc.
MaterialScience LLC (Pittsburgh, (North Kingstown, R.I.) names Ralph Exton is named chief market-
Pa.), succeeding Greg Babe, who is Lauritz Goodrich national sales ing officer of GE Power & Water
retiring. MacCleary will retain his manager for the companys Torayfan (Trevose, Pa.).
leadership of the polyurethanes mar- Polypropylene Film Div. Suzanne Shelley
S U
om s
Focus
on Ga
New s De
Engine tection
ering
Closed Mater
Liquid ials
Dispen
Findin sing
g the
To Fit Right
the Ap Gloves
Facts plicatio
at You n
r Fin
Vacuum gertips:
Pump
Flowm s
eter
News
Augu
st
2008
www. Sterili
8
che.c zation
More and more, business in the Chemical Process Industries (CPI) is not
Rever
se
PAG Osmo
E 34 sis
Heat
Transf
er
Fluids
Hydro
car
local, its global. To keep up with this rapidly evolving marketplace, you
Proper bon
ties
Focus
Filtrat
on
need a magazine that covers it all, not just one country or region, not just
ion
FOR MORE ECONOMIC INDICATORS, SEE NEXT PAGE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING WWW.CHE.COM JUNE 2012 79
Economic Indicators 2010 2011 2012
CPI output index (2007 = 100) Apr. '12 = 89.0 Mar. '12 = 89.0 Feb. '12 = 89.8 Apr. '11 = 87.3
CPI value of output, $ billions Mar. '12 = 2,182.9 Feb. '12 = 2,180.4 Jan. '12 = 2,144.8 Mar. '11 = 2,072.8
CPI operating rate, % Apr. '12 = 76.9 Mar. '12 = 76.9 Feb. '12 = 77.6 Apr. '11 = 75.3
Producer prices, industrial chemicals (1982 = 100) Apr. '12 = 329.6 Mar. '12 = 329.5 Feb. '12 = 318.1 Apr. '11 = 332.0
Industrial Production in Manufacturing (2007=100) Apr. '12 = 94.6 Mar. '12 = 94.1 Feb. '12 = 94.5 Apr. '11 = 89.5
Hourly earnings index, chemical & allied products (1992 = 100) Apr. '12 = 159.2 Mar. '12 = 157.2 Feb. '12 = 157.3 Apr. '11 = 155.1
Productivity index, chemicals & allied products (1992 = 100) Apr. '12 = 105.1 Mar. '12 = 105.4 Feb. '12 = 106.8 Apr. '11 = 107.3
CPI OUTPUT INDEX (2007 = 100) CPI OUTPUT VALUE ($ BILLIONS) CPI OPERATING RATE (%)
120 2500 85
110 2200 80
100 1900 75
90 1600 70
80 1300 65
70 1000 60
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
Current Business Indicators provided by IHS Global Insight, Inc., Lexington, Mass.
CURRENT TRENDS
apital equipment prices, as reflected in the CE Plant Cost gions. Production slipped in the Mid-Atlantic and West Coast
C Index (CEPCI; top), were relatively flat from February to
March (the most recent data).
and was flat in the Northeast.
Using a three month moving average, comparable to the
Meanwhile, all of the Current Business Indicators from IHS U.S. CPRI, production gains were seen in nearly all chemical
Global Insight (middle), were relatively flat from March to segments, except fertilizers, ACC says. Some of the largest
April. According to the American Chemistry Council (ACC; gains were in man-made fibers, adhesives, industrial gases,
Washington, D.C.; www.americanchemistry.com), the U.S. inorganic chemicals, and pesticides. Compared to March
Chemical Production Regional Index (U.S. CPRI) rose by 0.1% 2011, total chemical production in all regions was up 1.3%
in March, following a revised 1.0% gain in February, the and remained ahead year-over-year in all regions.
fourth consecutive gain. Regionally, chemical production rose Visit www.che.com/pci for more information and other tips
in the Gulf Coast, Midwest, Ohio Valley and Southeast re- on capital cost trends and methodology.
ChE.com
As a joint effort with Vogel Business
Media, we will once again be the official
show daily producers of the ACHEMA
DAILY, highlighting the current news,
trends, special programs, and events
during the show.
Maximize the efficiency of plant water use by improving condensate return and energy recovery, improve steam work
efficiency and excessive condensate production, optimize boiler and cooling tower blowdowns, and eliminate steam
vents all while developing a strategic water shortage contingency plan with a Total Facility Water Study.
Engineering TM
Circle 19 on p. 76 or go to adlinks.che.com/40268-19