You are on page 1of 10

______________

_________

________________

In the
Supreme Court of the United States

Judy
v.
Obama/Soetoro et.al

EMERGENCY APPLICATION TO INDIVIDUAL JUSTICE NEIL CORSUCH

PETITION OF MANDUMUS

FROM FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 14-00093

PARTIES TO THE ACTION


Plaintiff- Appellant
Cody Robert Judy
3037 So. Ogden Ave. Suite 2
Ogden, Utah 84401
801-497-6655

v.

Defendant-Appellee(s)
Mr. Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro
2446 Belmont Road
Kalorama, Washington DC 20008

Democratic National Committee


430 So. Capital St. SE
Washington DC 20003
PH. 202-863-2000

1
STATEMENT FOR RELIEF SOUGHT AND ISSUES PRESENTED

Appellant seeks an ORDER from the Honorable Neil Gorsuch directing the Federal

District Court to Grant the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE pursuant to the new evidence,

alleged criminal action upon which relief can be granted, brought to the Federal

District Court by Cody Robert Judy (hereafter Judy) in the MOTION FOR RELIEF OF

JUDGMENT & MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION and supplied Affidavits in Support

including:

1- Federal Law Criminal Code violated constitutes the crime of Fraud of

identification ie. Birth certificate of Barack Obama presented by him to the

Public and Media in White House Press Room. (18 U.S. Code 1028) - Fraud

and related activity in connection with identification documents,

authentication features, and information ie.[ Birth Certificate]


2- Law Enforcement Investigation sworn agents asserting the falsification of

identification in Barack Obamas birth certificate as not an Original as two

independent lab crime forensic investigations concurred upon examination. 9

Points of Forgery Video


a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c
3- The absence of Constitutional Qualification per United States Constitution

Article II. Section 1, C-5 unique to the Executive Branch of [natural born

Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents; excludes any form of

[naturalization acts] ie. Adoption by Congress as [Nationals and Citizens by

Birth] 8 U.S. Code 1401 a-h, 14th Amendment, per Congresss powers in

Article 1, 8, clause 4 from qualifying, except those Original Citizens at the

Time of the Adoption of this Constitution- (Article II, Section 1, C-5) upon

which a New Lawful Jurisdiction was born as a Nation under God.

Amendment XIX (Ratified Aug.1920)expanding the [natural born Citizen] pool

to female voters as natural born Citizens expanded and Persons Qualified as

2
female, and thereafter requiring [Citizen Parent[s]] in mutual respect for both

genders in [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].

JURISDICTION

1- 28 U.S. Code 2101 - Supreme Court; time for appeal or certiorari; docketing;
stay

(b) Any other direct appeal to the Supreme Court which is authorized by law,

from a decision of a [district court in any civil action], suit or proceeding, shall be

taken within thirty days from the judgment, order or decree, appealed from, if

interlocutory, and within sixty days if final.

(e) An application to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review a case

before judgment has been rendered in the [court of appeals] may be made at

any [time before judgment].

Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices

4. ....[When the Circuit Justice is unavailable [for any reason], the application

addressed to that Justice will be distributed to the Justice then available who

is [next junior to the Circuit Justice]; the turn of the Chief Justice follows that

of the most junior Justice.]

2- MOTION TO RECUSE JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR AND JUSTICE KAGAN filed in U.S.


Supreme Court Judy v. Obama Case No. 14-9396 also seen at:

a. https://www.scribd.com/document/288645476/Motion-to-Recuse-
Justice-Sotomayor-ie-Judy-v-Obama-14-9396

b. Sotomayor was nominated by Barack Obama and chiefly discriminated

against Judy in denying his Motion for forma Pauperis for a Writ of

Certiorari filed in Case No. 14-9396. A Justice of the U.S. Supreme

Court cannot become such without the nomination of a Constitutionally

3
Qualified President. Obama/Soetoro as defendant in this case places

her Justiceship in Jeopardy and likewise for:


c. Justice Kagan was nominated by Barack Obama and served as Chief

Counsel in Barack Obamas Administration as Solicitor General

defending the Affordable Health Care Act a signature priority of his

administration. The requirement for any Act of Congress is for a

Constitutionally Qualified President signature for it to become law. Her

defense of this as a Solicitor General of the Defendant Obama/Soetoro

compromises her as a Chief Counsel or Esquire for him.


d. Justice Neil Gorsuch is the next available Junior Justice regarding Rule

22 (4).

3- This Petition for a Writ Of Mandamus is also pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1651

BACKGROUND

4- On April 10th, 2017 (Exhibit 1) the Federal District Court issued the following

Denial of the ORER TO SHOW CAUSE dismissing the Federal Criminal Code

asserted in Fraud, and the evidence presented by Judy by a Law Enforcement

Agency Sheriff Department of Maricopa County AZ.


5- Because this Case has been to the U.S. Supreme Court in 14-9396 and was

denied solely based upon the denial of the Motion for Forma Pauperis

(Exhibit 2 Partial Federal Court Docket)


when all evidence provided to this Court of bank statements and net worth

proved Judy was wholly incapacitated financially to making copies and paying

court cost, the Principle Issue of Election Fraud in 2008 and 2012 by an

Unqualified Candidate is at large to this Court. The Writ of Certiorari

presented then is as well preserved for this Court today as it was when filed,

accept for the new evidence presented to the Federal District Court in the

Motion for Relief of Judgement and Motion for Reconsideration also referred in

4
part in the Writ of Certiorari filed as an ongoing Criminal Investigation by the

Sheriff Department of Maricopa County AZ


6- Thusly, the United States Supreme Court has direct jurisdiction in a direct

appeal for a Writ of Mandamus in ORDERING the lower Court to comply with

the alleged Criminal Code asserted, the Lawful Investigation by legal

authorities, and the Congressional Mandate so ordered by the

Clayton/Sherman Acts giving a Petitioner the prosecutorial powers of

reporting crime supplemented by the Civil Rights violations asserted by Judy

as a Presidential Candidate, or be seen as a Court of Criminal Complicity,

Corrupt in criminal misprision of felony, (18 U.S. Code 4 - Misprision of

felony )and thwarting Justice and Trial by Facts.


7- This Case is Nationally Recognized and is currently being reported on by

Media Sources which also presents a quandary for Criminal Cover-up by the

Court if not corrected immediately.


a. http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/03/29/obama-eligibility-lawsuit-

takes-new-turn/
b. http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/03/31/obama-eligibility-lawsuit-

takes-new-turn-conclusion/
c. https://www.bustle.com/articles/130896-has-a-candidate-sued-the-dnc-

before-bernie-sanders-isnt-the-first-technically
d. Obama Eligibility/Forgery Lawsuit: Judge Says Defendants Not Required

to Respond to Criminal Allegations

http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/04/11/obama-eligibilityforgery-

lawsuit-judge-says-defendants-not-required-respond-criminal-

allegations/
ARGUMENT
8- Precedent Case Law Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) assured there

was no doubt that those born in the Country to its Citizens were the [natural

born Citizens] and recalled doubts for those others at the time of birth born

5
under foreign jurisdiction or with foreign parent(s) subject to naturalization

acts of Congress. Judy v. McCain 2:2008cv01162


9- Judy has brought to the Court evidence that is indeed new and was not

available but asserted to in an ongoing Criminal Investigation. To warrant a

motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, the defendant

must show: "(1) the evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to

learn of the evidence was not caused by lack of diligence; (3) the new

evidence is not merely impeaching or cumulative; (4) the new evidence is

material to the principal issues involved; and (5) the new evidence would

probably produce an acquittal [ or presumed conviction] if a new trial were

granted." Hill, _ F.3d at _ (quoting United States v. Orr, 692 F.3d 1079, 1099

(10th Cir. 2012)) United States v. MacDonald, 779 F.2d 962, 964 (4th Cir.

1985) [or presumed conviction] added in relation to this Case. (To obtain a

new trial on the basis of after discovered evidence, that evidence must be

admissible in a new trial)


10-Judy maintains that by two witnesses and affidavits recorded by the Federal

Court the original Summons and Complaint were served stamped by the

Clerk of the Court, and it was the Court Clerk who became the scape-goat of

procuring a Cover-Up, and refusing to grant a Court Clerk Certification of

Default. However, given the Court every opportunity, Judy then asked the

Court for Service of Process to legally recognize to its satisfaction service of

process. This was then denied based on the Courts interpretation of

frivolousness. The Criminal Investigation has proved just the opposite,

warranting a Relief for Judy of the Judgement by the Federal Court, and

warranting a signed Order to Show Cause upon the Defendants to defend the

allegations.

6
11-The Federal Judge in this Case has acted as the Defendants attorney

prejudicing the Judgeship Seat with his own brand of criminal investigation,

and lawful authority to investigate, defend as Council the Defendants,

speculate as an expert witness, and be Judge, and Jury in his own Court of

Corruption denying Justice to even be heard.


12-This Petition for a Writ of Mandamus in no way compromises the Defendants

ability to defend themselves, or compromises the rule of law and the integrity

of the Court; that no one is seen as above the law in a respect including

Government Officials, and that Justice is available to all whether rich or poor.

May the Courts Justice agree and order the Federal Judge to comply, and sign

the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and all other remedies it may seem appropriate.
13-Submitted this 11 day of April, 2017.
a. Petitioner Pro se /s/ Cody Robert Judy ______________________________

EXHIBIT 1 ORDER

7
EXHIBIT 2 FEDERAL DOCKET 14-00013 SINCE SCOTUS 14-9396

8
9
MAILING CERTIFICATE OF MAILING AFFADAVIT
In compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 in accordance to Federal

Guidelines, I certify that I caused to be mailed the forgoing EMERGENCY

APPLICATION TO INDIVIDUAL JUSTICE NEIL CORSUCH PETITION OF

MANDUMUS FROM FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 14-00093 to the

following via first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid:


Mr. Barack Obama- 2446 Belmont Road, Kalorama, Washington DC 20008
And
Democratic National Committee 430 South Capital St. SE, Washington DC

20003 ph- 202-863-8000

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


DISTRICT OF UTAH
351 South West Temple, Rm. 1.100
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

Signed this 11th Day of April, 2017


Mailer: _______________________________/s/ Cody Robert Judy

10